A guide to web tools to prioritize candidate genes

Finding the most promising genes among large lists of candidate genes has been defined as the gene prioritization problem. It is a recurrent problem in genetics in which genetic conditions are reported to be associated with chromosomal regions. In the last decade, several different computational approaches have been developed to tackle this challenging task. In this study, we review 19 computational solutions for human gene prioritization that are freely accessible as web tools and illustrate their differences. We summarize the various biological problems to which they have been successfully applied. Ultimately, we describe several research directions that could increase the quality and applicability of the tools. In addition we developed a website (http://www.esat.kuleuven.be/gpp) containing detailed information about these and other tools, which is regularly updated. This review and the associated website constitute together a guide to help users select a gene prioritization strategy that suits best their needs.     

A methodology based on molecular interactions and pathways to find candidate genes associated to diseases: its application to schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease

Experimental techniques for the identification of genes associated with diseases are expensive and have certain limitations. In this scenario, computational methods are useful tools to identify lists of promising genes for further experimental verification. This paper describes a flexible methodology for the in silico prediction of genes associated with diseases combining the use of available tools for gene enrichment analysis, gene network generation and gene prioritization. A set of reference genes, with a known association to a disease, is used as bait to extract candidate genes from molecular interaction networks and enriched pathways. In a second step, prioritization methods are applied to evaluate the similarities between previously selected candidates and the set of reference genes. The top genes obtained by these programs are grouped into a single list sorted by the number of methods that have selected each gene. As a proof of concept, top genes reported a few years ago in SzGene and AlzGene databases were used as references to predict genes associated to schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease, respectively. In both cases, we were able to predict a statistically significant amount of genes belonging to the updated lists.     

Prioritization of candidate genes for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder by computational analysis of multiple data sources

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common, highly heritable psychiatric disorder characterized by hyperactivity, inattention and increased impulsivity. In recent years, a large number of genetic studies for ADHD have been published and related genetic data has been accumulated dramatically. To provide researchers a comprehensive ADHD genetic resource, we previously developed the first genetic database for ADHD (ADHDgene). The abundant genetic data provides novel candidates for further study. Meanwhile, it also brings new challenge for selecting promising candidate genes for replication and verification research. In this study, we surveyed the computational tools for candidate gene prioritization and selected five tools, which integrate multiple data sources for gene prioritization, to prioritize ADHD candidate genes in ADHDgene. The prioritization analysis resulted in 16 prioritized candidate genes, which are mainly involved in several major neurotransmitter systems or in nervous system development pathways. Among these genes, nervous system development related genes, especially SNAP25, STX1A and the gene-gene interactions related with each of them deserve further investigations. Our results may provide new insight for further verification study and facilitate the exploration of pathogenesis mechanism of ADHD.     

Computational approaches to disease-gene prediction: rationale, classification and successes

The identification of genes involved in human hereditary diseases often requires the time-consuming and expensive examination of a great number of possible candidate genes, since genome-wide techniques such as linkage analysis and association studies frequently select many hundreds of 'positional' candidates. Even considering the positive impact of next-generation sequencing technologies, the prioritization of candidate genes may be an important step for disease-gene identification. In this paper we develop a basic classification scheme for computational approaches to disease-gene prediction and apply it to exhaustively review bioinformatics tools that have been developed for this purpose, focusing on conceptual aspects rather than technical detail and performance. Finally, we discuss some past successes obtained by computational approaches to illustrate their beneficial contribution to medical research.     

An integrated approach to inferring gene-disease associations in humans

One of the most important tasks of modern bioinformatics is the development of computational tools that can be used to understand and treat human disease. To date, a variety of methods have been explored and algorithms for candidate gene prioritization are gaining in their usefulness. Here, we propose an algorithm for detecting gene-disease associations based on the human protein-protein interaction network, known gene-disease associations, protein sequence, and protein functional information at the molecular level. Our method, PhenoPred, is supervised: first, we mapped each gene/protein onto the spaces of disease and functional terms based on distance to all annotated proteins in the protein interaction network. We also encoded sequence, function, physicochemical, and predicted structural properties, such as secondary structure and flexibility. We then trained support vector machines to detect gene-disease associations for a number of terms in Disease Ontology and provided evidence that, despite the noise/incompleteness of experimental data and unfinished ontology of diseases, identification of candidate genes can be successful even when a large number of candidate disease terms are predicted on simultaneously. Availability: www.phenopred.org.     

Global risk transformative prioritization for prostate cancer candidate genes in molecular networks

Understanding the pathogenesis of complex diseases is aided by precise identification of the genes responsible. Many computational methods have been developed to prioritize candidate disease genes, but coverage of functional annotations may be a limiting factor for most of these methods. Here, we introduce a global candidate gene prioritization approach that considers information about network properties in the human protein interaction network and risk transformative contents from known disease genes. Global risk transformative scores were then used to prioritize candidate genes. This method was introduced to prioritize candidate genes for prostate cancer. The effectiveness of our global risk transformative algorithm for prioritizing candidate genes was evaluated according to validation studies. Compared with ToppGene and random walk-based methods, our method outperformed the two other candidate gene prioritization methods. The generality of our method was assessed by testing it on prostate cancer and other types of cancer. The performance was evaluated using standard leave-one-out cross-validation.     

Outcome of array CGH analysis for 255 subjects with intellectual disability and search for candidate genes using bioinformatics

Array CGH enables the detection of pathogenic copy number variants (CNVs) in 5–15% of individuals with intellectual disability (ID), making it a promising tool for uncovering ID candidate genes. However, most CNVs encompass multiple genes, making it difficult to identify key disease gene(s) underlying ID etiology. Using array CGH we identified 47 previously unreported unique CNVs in 45/255 probands. We prioritized ID candidate genes using five bioinformatic gene prioritization web tools. Gene priority lists were created by comparing integral genes from each CNV from our ID cohort with sets of training genes specific either to ID or randomly selected. Our findings suggest that different training sets alter gene prioritization only moderately; however, only the ID gene training set resulted in significant enrichment of genes with nervous system function (19%) in prioritized versus non-prioritized genes from the same de novo CNVs (7%, p < 0.05). This enrichment further increased to 31% when the five web tools were used in concert and included genes within mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathways. Gene prioritization web tools enrich for genes with relevant function in ID and more readily facilitate the selection of ID candidate genes for functional studies, particularly for large CNVs.     

Computational disease gene identification: a concert of methods prioritizes type 2 diabetes and obesity candidate genes

Genome-wide experimental methods to identify disease genes, such as linkage analysis and association studies, generate increasingly large candidate gene sets for which comprehensive empirical analysis is impractical. Computational methods employ data from a variety of sources to identify the most likely candidate disease genes from these gene sets. Here, we review seven independent computational disease gene prioritization methods, and then apply them in concert to the analysis of 9556 positional candidate genes for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the related trait obesity. We generate and analyse a list of nine primary candidate genes for T2D genes and five for obesity. Two genes, LPL and BCKDHA, are common to these two sets. We also present a set of secondary candidates for T2D (94 genes) and for obesity (116 genes) with 58 genes in common to both diseases.     

A Novel Prioritization Method in Identifying Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism-Related Genes

Identifying the genes involved in venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence is important not only for understanding the pathogenesis but also for discovering the therapeutic targets. We proposed a novel prioritization method called Function-Interaction-Pearson (FIP) by creating gene-disease similarity scores to prioritize candidate genes underling VTE. The scores were calculated by integrating and optimizing three types of resources including gene expression, gene ontology and protein-protein interaction. As a result, 124 out of top 200 prioritized candidate genes had been confirmed in literature, among which there were 34 antithrombotic drug targets. Compared with two well-known gene prioritization tools Endeavour and ToppNet, FIP was shown to have better performance. The approach provides a valuable alternative for drug targets discovery and disease therapy.     

Disease Gene Characterization through Large-Scale Co-Expression Analysis

Background

In the post genome era, a major goal of biology is the identification of specific roles for individual genes. We report a new genomic tool for gene characterization, the UCLA Gene Expression Tool (UGET).

Results

Celsius, the largest co-normalized microarray dataset of Affymetrix based gene expression, was used to calculate the correlation between all possible gene pairs on all platforms, and generate stored indexes in a web searchable format. The size of Celsius makes UGET a powerful gene characterization tool. Using a small seed list of known cartilage-selective genes, UGET extended the list of known genes by identifying 32 new highly cartilage-selective genes. Of these, 7 of 10 tested were validated by qPCR including the novel cartilage-specific genes SDK2 and FLJ41170. In addition, we retrospectively tested UGET and other gene expression based prioritization tools to identify disease-causing genes within known linkage intervals. We first demonstrated this utility with UGET using genetically heterogeneous disorders such as Joubert syndrome, microcephaly, neuropsychiatric disorders and type 2 limb girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD2) and then compared UGET to other gene expression based prioritization programs which use small but discrete and well annotated datasets. Finally, we observed a significantly higher gene correlation shared between genes in disease networks associated with similar complex or Mendelian disorders.

Discussion

UGET is an invaluable resource for a geneticist that permits the rapid inclusion of expression criteria from one to hundreds of genes in genomic intervals linked to disease. By using thousands of arrays UGET annotates and prioritizes genes better than other tools especially with rare tissue disorders or complex multi-tissue biological processes. This information can be critical in prioritization of candidate genes for sequence analysis.     

Harnessing Gene Expression Networks to Prioritize Candidate Epileptic Encephalopathy Genes

We apply a novel gene expression network analysis to a cohort of 182 recently reported candidate Epileptic Encephalopathy genes to identify those most likely to be true Epileptic Encephalopathy genes. These candidate genes were identified as having single variants of likely pathogenic significance discovered in a large-scale massively parallel sequencing study. Candidate Epileptic Encephalopathy genes were prioritized according to their co-expression with 29 known Epileptic Encephalopathy genes. We utilized developing brain and adult brain gene expression data from the Allen Human Brain Atlas (AHBA) and compared this to data from Celsius: a large, heterogeneous gene expression data warehouse. We show replicable prioritization results using these three independent gene expression resources, two of which are brain-specific, with small sample size, and the third derived from a heterogeneous collection of tissues with large sample size. Of the nineteen genes that we predicted with the highest likelihood to be true Epileptic Encephalopathy genes, two (GNAO1 and GRIN2B) have recently been independently reported and confirmed. We compare our results to those produced by an established in silico prioritization approach called Endeavour, and finally present gene expression networks for the known and candidate Epileptic Encephalopathy genes. This highlights sub-networks of gene expression, particularly in the network derived from the adult AHBA gene expression dataset. These networks give clues to the likely biological interactions between Epileptic Encephalopathy genes, potentially highlighting underlying mechanisms and avenues for therapeutic targets.     

GroupRank: Rank Candidate Genes in PPI Network by Differentially Expressed Gene Groups

Many cell activities are organized as a network, and genes are clustered into co-expressed groups if they have the same or closely related biological function or they are co-regulated. In this study, based on an assumption that a strong candidate disease gene is more likely close to gene groups in which all members coordinately differentially express than individual genes with differential expression, we developed a novel disease gene prioritization method GroupRank by integrating gene co-expression and differential expression information generated from microarray data as well as PPI network. A candidate gene is ranked high using GroupRank if it is differentially expressed in disease and control or is close to differentially co-expressed groups in PPI network. We tested our method on data sets of lung, kidney, leukemia and breast cancer. The results revealed GroupRank could efficiently prioritize disease genes with significantly improved AUC value in comparison to the previous method with no consideration of co-exprssed gene groups in PPI network. Moreover, the functional analyses of the major contributing gene group in gene prioritization of kidney cancer verified that our algorithm GroupRank not only ranks disease genes efficiently but also could help us identify and understand possible mechanisms in important physiological and pathological processes of disease.     

Chapter 15: Disease Gene Prioritization

Disease-causing aberrations in the normal function of a gene define that gene as a disease gene. Proving a causal link between a gene and a disease experimentally is expensive and time-consuming. Comprehensive prioritization of candidate genes prior to experimental testing drastically reduces the associated costs. Computational gene prioritization is based on various pieces of correlative evidence that associate each gene with the given disease and suggest possible causal links. A fair amount of this evidence comes from high-throughput experimentation. Thus, well-developed methods are necessary to reliably deal with the quantity of information at hand. Existing gene prioritization techniques already significantly improve the outcomes of targeted experimental studies. Faster and more reliable techniques that account for novel data types are necessary for the development of new diagnostics, treatments, and cure for many diseases.

This article is part of the “Translational Bioinformatics" collection for PLOS Computational Biology.

What to Learn in This Chapter

• Identification of specific disease genes is complicated by gene pleiotropy, polygenic nature of many diseases, varied influence of environmental factors, and overlying genome variation.
• Gene prioritization is the process of assigning likelihood of gene involvement in generating a disease phenotype. This approach narrows down, and arranges in the order of likelihood in disease involvement, the set of genes to be tested experimentally.
• The gene “priority" in disease is assigned by considering a set of relevant features such as gene expression and function, pathway involvement, and mutation effects.
• In general, disease genes tend to 1) interact with other disease genes, 2) harbor functionally deleterious mutations, 3) code for proteins localizing to the affected biological compartment (pathway, cellular space, or tissue), 4) have distinct sequence properties such as longer length and a higher number of exons, 5) have more orthologues and fewer paralogues.
• Data sources (directly experimental, extracted from knowledge-bases, or text-mining based) and mathematical/computational models used for gene prioritization vary widely.

     

Prioritization of differentially expressed genes through integrating public expression data

Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis is a major approach for interpreting phenotype differences and produces a large number of candidate genes. Given that it is burdensome to validate too many genes through benchwork, an urgent need exists for DEG prioritization. Here, a novel method is proposed for prioritizing bona fide DEGs by constructing the normal range of gene expression through integrating public expression data. Prioritization was performed by ranking the differences in cumulative probability for genes in case and control groups. DEGs from a study on pig muscle tissue were used to evaluate the prioritization accuracy. The results showed that the method reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 96.42% and can effectively shorten the list of candidate genes from a differential expression experiment to find novel causal genes. Our method can be easily extended to other tissues or species to promote functional research in broad applications.     

Network-based integration method for potential breast cancer gene identification

Breast cancer is the most common female death-causing cancer worldwide. A network-based integration method was proposed to identify potential breast cancer genes. First, genes were prioritized using a gene prioritization algorithm by the strategy of disease risks transferred between genes in a network with weighted vertexes and edges. Our prioritization algorithm was effectives and robust for top-ranked seed gene number and higher area under the curve values compared to ToppGene and ToppNet. Then, 20 potential breast cancer genes were identified as common genes of the top 50 candidate genes for their robustness in multiple prioritizations. These genes could accurately classify tumor and normal samples of all and paired sample sets and three independent datasets. Of potential breast cancer genes, 18 were verified by literature and 2 were novel genes that need further study. This study would contribute to the understanding of the genetic architecture for the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.     

Enhancing the Prioritization of Disease-Causing Genes through Tissue Specific Protein Interaction Networks

The prioritization of candidate disease-causing genes is a fundamental challenge in the post-genomic era. Current state of the art methods exploit a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network for this task. They are based on the observation that genes causing phenotypically-similar diseases tend to lie close to one another in a PPI network. However, to date, these methods have used a static picture of human PPIs, while diseases impact specific tissues in which the PPI networks may be dramatically different. Here, for the first time, we perform a large-scale assessment of the contribution of tissue-specific information to gene prioritization. By integrating tissue-specific gene expression data with PPI information, we construct tissue-specific PPI networks for 60 tissues and investigate their prioritization power. We find that tissue-specific PPI networks considerably improve the prioritization results compared to those obtained using a generic PPI network. Furthermore, they allow predicting novel disease-tissue associations, pointing to sub-clinical tissue effects that may escape early detection.     

基于随机游走的风险致病基因预测研究进展

风险致病基因预测有助于揭示癌症等复杂疾病发生、发展机理,提高现有复杂疾病检测、预防及治疗水平,为药物设计提供靶标.全基因组关联分析(GWAS)和连锁分析等传统方法通常会产生数百种候选致病基因,采用生物实验方法进一步验证这些候选致病基因往往成本高、费时费力,而通过计算方法预测风险致病基因,并对其进行排序,可有效减少候选致病基因数量,帮助生物学家优化实验验证方案.鉴于目前随机游走算法在风险致病基因预测方面的卓越表现,本文从单元分子网络、多重分子网络和异构分子网络出发,对基于随机游走预测风险致病基因研究进展进行较全面的综述分析,讨论其所存在的计算问题,展望未来可能的研究方向.     

Prioritization and evaluation of depression candidate genes by combining multidimensional data resources

Background

Large scale and individual genetic studies have suggested numerous susceptible genes for depression in the past decade without conclusive results. There is a strong need to review and integrate multi-dimensional data for follow up validation. The present study aimed to apply prioritization procedures to build-up an evidence-based candidate genes dataset for depression.

Methods

Depression candidate genes were collected in human and animal studies across various data resources. Each gene was scored according to its magnitude of evidence related to depression and was multiplied by a source-specific weight to form a combined score measure. All genes were evaluated through a prioritization system to obtain an optimal weight matrix to rank their relative importance with depression using the combined scores. The resulting candidate gene list for depression (DEPgenes) was further evaluated by a genome-wide association (GWA) dataset and microarray gene expression in human tissues.

Results

A total of 5,055 candidate genes (4,850 genes from human and 387 genes from animal studies with 182 being overlapped) were included from seven data sources. Through the prioritization procedures, we identified 169 DEPgenes, which exhibited high chance to be associated with depression in GWA dataset (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p = 0.00005). Additionally, the DEPgenes had a higher percentage to express in human brain or nerve related tissues than non-DEPgenes, supporting the neurotransmitter and neuroplasticity theories in depression.

Conclusions

With comprehensive data collection and curation and an application of integrative approach, we successfully generated DEPgenes through an effective gene prioritization system. The prioritized DEPgenes are promising for future biological experiments or replication efforts to discoverthe underlying molecular mechanisms for depression.