过氧化物酶体增长因子活化受体（PPARs）与microRNAs

在细胞中,过氧化物酶体增长因子活化受体（PPARs）和microRNAs相互制约和调控从而影响相关细胞、组织和器官的功能,在脂肪细胞分化与代谢、炎症、癌症和心血管疾病等生理和病理过程中发挥重要作用.本文首先简要总结了PPARs发挥作用的分子机制;并分别以PPARs家族每一个成员（PPARα、PPARβ和PPARγ）为对象,分析了PPARs调控下的microRNAs表达及功能,探讨了microRNAs调控下的PPARs表达活性变化,并归纳了PPARs与microRNAs之间的调控关系;最后对PPARs相关microRNAs的应用前景进行了简单探讨.研究PPARs与microRNAs间的网络调控关系,可以为PPARs与microRNAs在理论和实践中的深入研究和应用提供参考.     

Assembly of GABA(A) receptors (Review)

GABA(A) receptors are the major inhibitory transmitter receptors in the central nervous system. They are chloride ion channels that can be opened by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and are the targets of action of a variety of pharmacologically and clinically important drugs. GABA(A) receptors are composed of five subunits that can belong to different subunit classes. The existence of 19 different subunits gives rise to the formation of a large variety of distinct GABA(A) receptor subtypes in the brain. The majority of GABA(A) receptors seems to be composed of two alpha, two beta and one gamma subunit and the occurrence of a defined subunit stoichiometry and arrangement in alphabetagamma receptors strongly indicates that assembly of GABA(A) receptors proceeds via defined pathways. Based on the differential ability of subunits to interact with each other, a variety of studies have been performed to identify amino acid sequences or residues important for assembly. Such residues might be involved in direct protein-protein interactions, or in stabilizing direct contact sites in other regions of the subunit. Several homo-oligomeric or hetero-oligomeric assembly intermediates could be the starting point of GABA(A) receptor assembly but so far no unequivocal assembly mechanism has been identified. Possible mechanisms of assembly of GABA(A) receptors are discussed in the light of recent publications.     

Trafficking of 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) receptors (Review)

The 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) receptors are members of the Cys-loop family of neurotransmitter-gated ion channels that also include receptors for glycine and acetylcholine. The 5-HT(3) and acetylcholine receptors (cationic ion channels) and the GABA(A) and glycine receptors (anionic ion channels) generally depolarize or hyperpolarize, respectively, the neuronal membrane. Within the amino-terminal extracellular region, all members of this family exhibit a similar architecture of ligand binding domains and a number of key residues are completely conserved. The molecular characterization of their ligand binding and gating characteristics has benefited from the existence of a large repertoire of individual subunits that contribute to the pentameric ion channel. Although differences do exist, advances in our knowledge of one member offers valuable insight into the family as a whole. Each member of the Cys-loop receptors (and all other multimeric ion channels) must face the same challenges: How to assemble individual subunits into an ion channel and which subunits to use? How are assembled receptors distinguished from those that are unassembled or misassembled, then exported from the endoplasmic reticulum and delivered to the cell surface? How are they targeted to, and anchored at synaptic and extrasynaptic sites? How and when are they to be removed from these sites to provide long-term regulation of neuronal activity? In this review, we summarize our current knowledge for the 5-HT(3) and GABA(A) receptors that have provided complementary information and helped us build an overall picture of how receptor biogenesis and trafficking occurs.     

Characterization of insect neuronal octopamine receptors (OA3 receptors)

Octopamine receptors in the nervous tissue of insects were investigated using a ligand-receptor assay with [³H]NC-5Z or [³H]octopamine as the radioligands. Both ligands recognized a homogenous class of binding sites with the properties of an octopamine receptor. This receptor has been characterized pharmacologically. Both high-affinity agonists (e.g. NC 7, K₁=0.3 nM) and antagonists (e.g. maroxepine, K₁=1.02 nM) were investigated. The neuronal octopamine receptor belongs to a receptor class that can easily be distinguished from peripheral octopamine receptors. Initial investigations of the localization of octopamine receptors within the insect nervous tissue show the greatest receptor density in the optic lobes.     

Steroid receptors in cns: Estradiol(ER) and Progesterone(PR) receptors in human spinal cord tumors

To investigate the role of steroid hormones in the occurrence and growth of human spinal cord tumors and to study the biochemical basis of the sex related difference in the incidence of the various spinal oncotypes, ER and PR have been measured in 24 human spinal cord tumors (12 neurinomas, 6 meningiomas, 5 ependymomas and 1 astrocytoma) by means of sodium thiocyanate exchange assay at low temperature and with dextran-coated charcoal method and R5020 for PR. Cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors have been evaluated. Neurinomas are the oncotypes which contained both ER (usually in the nuclear fraction) and PR: estradiol binding has been found only in one meningioma; ependymomas contained cytoplasmic ER and the astrocytoma had nuclear ER and cytoplasmic PR. The dissociation constant is in favour of a high affinity binding (Kind = 0.15 × 10⁻⁹ M) for ER_c; K_d = 3.85 × 10⁻⁹ M for ERn; K_d = 8.07 × 10⁻⁹ M for PRc). The overall incidence of steroid receptors in the spinal oncotypes studied is higher in male than in female patients (63.64 vs 46.15% for ER and 100 vs 71.43% for PR). Further studies on a greater number of patients will help to define the correlation between different spinal oncotypes and steroid receptors as well as the possibility of an endocrine therapy as adjuvant treatment for selected patients.     

IP(3) receptors, stress and apoptosis

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) receptors are intracellular calcium channels that are able to release calcium from intracellular stores upon activation by IP3 and modulation by calcium. IP3 receptors are involved in variety of processes during physiological, but also in the pathophysiological states. Unraveling their regulation and function, especially under the pathological situations can result in a development of new therapeutic strategies based on the IP3 receptor′s activation and/or blocking. To the stimuli that can modulate IP3 receptors belong several stress factors (e.g. immobilization stress, oxidative stress and hypoxia) and also apoptosis. Depending on the length and strength of the stress stimulus, expression of IP3 receptors can be increased, or decreased. Therefore, in this minireview modulation of IP3 receptors by some stressors is discussed. Since it was already shown that strong hypoxia might lead to the apoptosis induction, special focus will be given to the hypoxic stress and induction of apoptosis.     

Endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in postnatal intestine

We aimed to characterize endothelin (ET) receptors in the swine intestinal vasculature and to determine ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) effects on these receptors. Saturation and competitive binding assays were performed on mesenteric artery protein membranes from 1- and 40-day-old animals, both control and those subjected to 1 h of partial ischemia followed by 6 h of reperfusion in vivo. Scatchard analysis of saturation binding with (125)I-labeled ET-1 in membranes from endothelium-denuded (E(-)) vessels revealed that the maximum number of binding sites was greater in younger animals. Competitive (125)I-ET-1 binding was significant for a one-site model with ET-1, ET-3, and sarafotoxin S6c (S6c) in membranes from endothelium-intact (E(+)) and E(-) vessels in both age groups. The maximum number of ET-1 binding sites was significantly greater in younger animals. In the presence of the ET(A) receptor antagonist BQ-123, competitive (125)I-ET-1 binding was significant for a one-site model with ET-1 and S6c in membranes from E(+) vessels in both age groups. The maximum number of ET-1 binding sites was significantly greater in younger animals. After I/R, the maximum number of ET-1 binding sites was unchanged. In the presence of BQ-123, specific binding by ET-1 and S6c was eliminated in both age groups after I/R. These results suggest that both ET receptor populations are expressed to a greater degree in younger animals and I/R significantly affects the ET(B) receptor.     

Assembly of GABAA receptors (Review)

GABA_A receptors are the major inhibitory transmitter receptors in the central nervous system. They are chloride ion channels that can be opened by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and are the targets of action of a variety of pharmacologically and clinically important drugs. GABA_A receptors are composed of five subunits that can belong to different subunit classes. The existence of 19 different subunits gives rise to the formation of a large variety of distinct GABA_A receptor subtypes in the brain. The majority of GABA_A receptors seems to be composed of two α, two β and one γ subunit and the occurrence of a defined subunit stoichiometry and arrangement in αβγ receptors strongly indicates that assembly of GABA_A receptors proceeds via defined pathways. Based on the differential ability of subunits to interact with each other, a variety of studies have been performed to identify amino acid sequences or residues important for assembly. Such residues might be involved in direct protein-protein interactions, or in stabilizing direct contact sites in other regions of the subunit. Several homo-oligomeric or hetero-oligomeric assembly intermediates could be the starting point of GABA_A receptor assembly but so far no unequivocal assembly mechanism has been identified. Possible mechanisms of assembly of GABA_A receptors are discussed in the light of recent publications.     

Cl(-) concentration changes and desensitization of GABA(A) and glycine receptors

Desensitization of ligand-gated ion channels plays a critical role for the information transfer between neurons. The current view on γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)(A) and glycine receptors includes significant rapid components of desensitization as well as cross-desensitization between the two receptor types. Here, we analyze the mechanism of apparent cross-desensitization between native GABA(A) and glycine receptors in rat central neurons and quantify to what extent the current decay in the presence of ligand is a result of desensitization versus changes in intracellular Cl(-) concentration ([Cl(-)](i)). We show that apparent cross-desensitization of currents evoked by GABA and by glycine is caused by changes in [Cl(-)](i). We also show that changes in [Cl(-)](i) are critical for the decay of current in the presence of either GABA or glycine, whereas changes in conductance often play a minor role only. Thus, the currents decayed significantly quicker than the conductances, which decayed with time constants of several seconds and in some cells did not decay below the value at peak current during 20-s agonist application. By taking the cytosolic volume into account and numerically computing the membrane currents and expected changes in [Cl(-)](i), we provide a theoretical framework for the observed effects. Modeling diffusional exchange of Cl(-) between cytosol and patch pipettes, we also show that considerable changes in [Cl(-)](i) may be expected and cause rapidly decaying current components in conventional whole cell or outside-out patch recordings. The findings imply that a reevaluation of the desensitization properties of GABA(A) and glycine receptors is needed.     

Down regulation of enkephalin (delta) receptors. Demonstration in membrane-bound and solubilized receptors

The pentapeptide leucine enkephalin induced down-regulation of enkephalin receptors in neuroblastoma-glioma NG108-15 hybrid cells in a reversible fashion, whereas the stable enkephalin analogue D-Ala2-Met-enkephalinamide (AMEA), and the potent opiate alkaloid, etorphine, had a prolonged effect. The opiate alkaloid, morphine, which has low affinity to delta-type enkephalin receptors of these cells did not induce down-regulation, whereas AMEA decreased the binding of both opiate agonists and antagonists but had no effect on the binding of the alpha 2-adrenergic ligand, [3H]yohimbine. From several experiments that were designed to remove the tightly bound AMEA, and from experiments with solubilized receptor we ruled out the possibility that the decreased binding capacity of enkephalin-treated cells reflects only receptor masking. The study suggests that down-regulation of enkephalin receptors that may also occur in vivo can account for some of the abnormal physiological responses of subjects treated chromically with opiates. However, since opiates from the morphine type can induce opiate tolerance in vivo, but not down-regulation of enkephalin receptors in the cultured cells, we suggest that down-regulation of delta-type opiate receptors may not be prerequisite for the development of the physiological tolerance/dependence on these alkaloids.     

Inactive-state preassembly of G(q)-coupled receptors and G(q) heterotrimers

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transmit signals by forming active-state complexes with heterotrimeric G proteins. It has been suggested that some GPCRs also assemble with G proteins before ligand-induced activation and that inactive-state preassembly facilitates rapid and specific G protein activation. However, no mechanism of preassembly has been described, and no functional consequences of preassembly have been demonstrated. Here we show that M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (M3R) form inactive-state complexes with G(q) heterotrimers in intact cells. The M3R C terminus is sufficient, and a six-amino-acid polybasic sequence distal to helix 8 ((565)KKKRRK(570)) is necessary for preassembly with G(q). Replacing this sequence with six alanine residues prevents preassembly, slows the rate of G(q) activation and decreases steady-state agonist sensitivity. That other G(q)-coupled receptors possess similar polybasic regions and also preassemble with G(q) suggests that these GPCRs may use a common preassembly mechanism to facilitate activation of G(q) heterotrimers.     

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) receptors in rat brain

1. Specific binding sites for neuropeptide Y (NPY) and peptide YY (PYY) were investigated in rat brain areas using quantitative receptor autoradiography with 125I-Bolton-Hunter NPY (125I-BH-NPY) and 125I-PYY, radioligands for PP-fold family peptides receptors. 2. There were no differences between localization of 125I-BH-NPY and 125I-PYY binding sites in the rat brain. High densities of the binding sites were present in the anterior olfactory nucleus, lateral septal nucleus, stratum radiatum of the hippocampus, posteromedial cortical amygdaloid nucleus, and area postrema. 3. In cold ligand-saturation experiments done in the presence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled NPY and PYY, 125I-BH-NPY and 125I-PYY binding to the stratum radiatum of the hippocampus, layer I of the somatosensory frontoparietal cortex, molecular layer of the cerebellum, and area postrema was single and of a high affinity. There was a significant difference between the affinities of 125I-BH-NPY (Kd = 0.96 nM) and 125I-PYY binding (Kd = 0.05 nM) to the molecular layer of the cerebellum. The binding of the two radioligands to the other areas examined had the same affinities. 4. When comparing the potency of unlabeled rat pancreatic polypeptide (rPP), a family peptide of NPY and PYY, to inhibit the binding to the areas examined, rPP displaced 125I-BH-NPY and 125I-PYY binding to the area postrema more potently than it did the binding to the stratum radiatum of the hippocampus, layer I of the somatosensory frontoparietal cortex, and molecular layer of the cerebellum. 5. Thus, the quantitative receptor autoradiographic method with 125I-BH-NPY and 125I-PYY revealed differences in binding characteristics of specific NPY and PYY binding sites in different areas of the rat brain. The results provide further evidence for the existence of multiple NPY-PYY receptors in the central nervous system.     

Assembly and forward trafficking of NMDA receptors (Review)

N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are a subclass of the excitatory, ionotropic L-glutamate neurotransmitter receptors. They are important for normal brain function being both primary candidates for the molecular basis of learning and memory and in the establishment of synaptic connections during the development of the central nervous system. NMDA receptors are also implicated in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Their dysfunction which is primarily due to either hypo- or hyper-activity is pivotal to these pathological conditions. There is thus a fine balance between NMDA receptor-mediated mechanisms in normal brain and those in diseased states where receptor homeostasis is perturbed. Receptor activity is due in part to the number of surface expressed receptors. Understanding the assembly and trafficking of this complex, heteromeric, neurotransmitter receptor family may therefore, be pivotal to understanding diseases in which their altered activity is evident. This article will review the current understanding of the mechanisms of NMDA receptor assembly, how this assembly is regulated and how assembled receptors are trafficked to their appropriate sites in post-synaptic membranes where they are integral components of a macromolecular signalling complex.     

Platelet adhesion receptors and (patho)physiological thrombus formation

In thrombus formation associated with hemostasis or thrombotic disease, blood platelets first undergo a rapid transition from a circulating state to an adherent state, followed by activation and aggregation. Under flow conditions in the bloodstream, this process potentially involves platelet-platelet, platelet-endothelium, platelet-subendothelial matrix, and platelet-leukocyte interactions. Specific adhesion receptors on platelets mediate these interactions, by engaging counter-receptors on other cells, or noncellular ligands in the plasma or matrix. The glycoprotein (GP) Ib-IX-V complex on platelets initiates adhesion at high shear stress by binding the adhesive ligand, von Willebrand Factor (vWF). GP Ib-IX-V may also mediate platelet-endothelium or platelet-leukocyte adhesion, by recognition of P-selectin or Mac-1, respectively. Other membrane glycoproteins, such as the collagen receptor GP VI, may trigger platelet activation at low shear rates. Engagement of GP Ib-IX-V or GP VI leads ultimately to platelet aggregation mediated by the integrin, alphaIIbbeta3 (GP IIb-IIIa). This review will focus on recent advances in understanding structure-activity relationships of GP Ib-IX-V, its role in initiating thrombus formation, and its emerging relationships with other vascular cell adhesion receptors.     

Neuronal receptors for phospholipases A(2 )and beta-neurotoxicity

Some phospholipases A(2) interrupt neuromuscular communication by blocking the release of neurotransmitter into the synaptic cleft. Despite numerous studies, the molecular mechanism of their action is still largely obscure. In this review the best-characterized receptors for beta-neurotoxins are presented. We propose a model which could be useful in investigating the apparent inconsistency between the observed heterogeneity in the neuronal binding of beta-neurotoxins and the very similar pathomorphological and electrophysiological effects which they produce in the intoxicated tissue. We assume that beta-neurotoxins enter the nerve ending to exert their toxic effect. The model involves different pathways for phospholipase A(2) neurotoxins to reach the site of action inside the neuron, their respective extra- and intracellular neuronal receptors being key features of the pathway. Once in the nerve cell, beta-neurotoxins impair the function of the synaptic vesicles by phospholipid hydrolysis of the inner leaflet of the vesicle bilayer. The proportion of the products of the phospholipid hydrolysis, lysophospholipids and phospholipids in the membrane, has been demonstrated to be very important for the shaping of the membrane, affecting its fusogenic properties. Due to the same final step in the action of beta-neurotoxins, phospholipid hydrolysis, the consequences of their poisoning are practically identical.     

GABA(B) receptors function as heterodimers

Our current understanding is that functional GABA(B) receptors exist as heterodimers of two related seven-transmembrane proteins, GABA(B)-R1 and GABA(B)-R2. GABA(B)-R1 requires GABA(B)-R2 to be expressed at the cell surface as a mature glycoprotein. Cloning of the GABA(B) receptor has failed to provide molecular evidence to support the existence of true receptor subtypes. The discovery of the heterodimeric nature of the GABA(B) receptor has already changed the way we think about GPCR function and it is likely that future studies will change our understanding about how receptor subtypes can be formed.