Architecture and assembly of the Gram‐positive cell wall

The bacterial cell wall is a mesh polymer of peptidoglycan – linear glycan strands cross‐linked by flexible peptides – that determines cell shape and provides physical protection. While the glycan strands in thin ‘Gram‐negative’ peptidoglycan are known to run circumferentially around the cell, the architecture of the thicker ‘Gram‐positive’ form remains unclear. Using electron cryotomography, here we show that Bacillus subtilis peptidoglycan is a uniformly dense layer with a textured surface. We further show it rips circumferentially, curls and thickens at free edges, and extends longitudinally when denatured. Molecular dynamics simulations show that only atomic models based on the circumferential topology recapitulate the observed curling and thickening, in support of an ‘inside‐to‐outside’ assembly process. We conclude that instead of being perpendicular to the cell surface or wrapped in coiled cables (two alternative models), the glycan strands in Gram‐positive cell walls run circumferentially around the cell just as they do in Gram‐negative cells. Together with providing insights into the architecture of the ultimate determinant of cell shape, this study is important because Gram‐positive peptidoglycan is an antibiotic target crucial to the viability of several important rod‐shaped pathogens including Bacillus anthracis, Listeria monocytogenes, and Clostridium difficile.     

Short FtsZ filaments can drive asymmetric cell envelope constriction at the onset of bacterial cytokinesis

FtsZ, the bacterial homologue of eukaryotic tubulin, plays a central role in cell division in nearly all bacteria and many archaea. It forms filaments under the cytoplasmic membrane at the division site where, together with other proteins it recruits, it drives peptidoglycan synthesis and constricts the cell. Despite extensive study, the arrangement of FtsZ filaments and their role in division continue to be debated. Here, we apply electron cryotomography to image the native structure of intact dividing cells and show that constriction in a variety of Gram‐negative bacterial cells, including Proteus mirabilis and Caulobacter crescentus, initiates asymmetrically, accompanied by asymmetric peptidoglycan incorporation and short FtsZ‐like filament formation. These results show that a complete ring of FtsZ is not required for constriction and lead us to propose a model for FtsZ‐driven division in which short dynamic FtsZ filaments can drive initial peptidoglycan synthesis and envelope constriction at the onset of cytokinesis, later increasing in length and number to encircle the division plane and complete constriction.     

Differential localization of LTA synthesis proteins and their interaction with the cell division machinery in Staphylococcus aureus

Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) is an important cell wall component of Gram‐positive bacteria. In Staphylococcus aureus it consists of a polyglycerolphosphate‐chain that is retained within the membrane via a glycolipid. Using an immunofluorescence approach, we show here that the LTA polymer is not surface exposed in S. aureus, as it can only be detected after digestion of the peptidoglycan layer. S. aureus mutants lacking LTA are enlarged and show aberrant positioning of septa, suggesting a link between LTA synthesis and the cell division process. Using a bacterial two‐hybrid approach, we show that the three key LTA synthesis proteins, YpfP and LtaA, involved in glycolipid production, and LtaS, required for LTA backbone synthesis, interact with one another. All three proteins also interacted with numerous cell division and peptidoglycan synthesis proteins, suggesting the formation of a multi‐enzyme complex and providing further evidence for the co‐ordination of these processes. When assessed by fluorescence microscopy, YpfP and LtaA fluorescent protein fusions localized to the membrane while the LtaS enzyme accumulated at the cell division site. These data support a model whereby LTA backbone synthesis proceeds in S. aureus at the division site in co‐ordination with cell division, while glycolipid synthesis takes place throughout the membrane.     

A protein critical for cell constriction in the Gram‐negative bacterium Caulobacter crescentus localizes at the division site through its peptidoglycan‐binding LysM domains

During division of Gram‐negative bacteria, invagination of the cytoplasmic membrane and inward growth of the peptidoglycan (PG) are followed by the cleavage of connective septal PG to allow cell separation. This PG splitting process requires temporal and spatial regulation of cell wall hydrolases. In Escherichia coli, LytM factors play an important role in PG splitting. Here we identify and characterize a member of this family (DipM) in Caulobacter crescentus. Unlike its E. coli counterparts, DipM is essential for viability under fast‐growth conditions. Under slow‐growth conditions, the ΔdipM mutant displays severe defects in cell division and FtsZ constriction. Consistent with its function in division, DipM colocalizes with the FtsZ ring during the cell cycle. Mutagenesis suggests that the LytM domain of DipM is essential for protein function, despite being non‐canonical. DipM also carries two tandems of the PG‐binding LysM domain that are sufficient for FtsZ ring localization. Localization and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching microscopy experiments suggest that DipM localization is mediated, at least in part, by the ability of the LysM tandems to distinguish septal, multilayered PG from non‐septal, monolayered PG.     

Staphylococcus aureus DivIB is a peptidoglycan‐binding protein that is required for a morphological checkpoint in cell division

Bacterial cell division is a fundamental process that requires the coordinated actions of a number of proteins which form a complex macromolecular machine known as the divisome. The membrane‐spanning proteins DivIB and its orthologue FtsQ are crucial divisome components in Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria respectively. However, the role of almost all of the integral division proteins, including DivIB, still remains largely unknown. Here we show that the extracellular domain of DivIB is able to bind peptidoglycan and have mapped the binding to its β subdomain. Conditional mutational studies show that divIB is essential for Staphylococcus aureus growth, while phenotypic analyses following depletion of DivIB results in a block in the completion, but not initiation, of septum formation. Localisation studies suggest that DivIB only transiently localises to the division site and may mark previous sites of septation. We propose that DivIB is required for a molecular checkpoint during division to ensure the correct assembly of the divisome at midcell and to prevent hydrolytic growth of the cell in the absence of a completed septum.     

A new factor stimulating peptidoglycan hydrolysis to separate daughter cells in Caulobacter crescentus

Cell division in Gram‐negative bacteria involves the co‐ordinated invagination of the three cell envelope layers to form two new daughter cell poles. This complex process starts with the polymerization of the tubulin‐like protein FtsZ into a Z‐ring at mid‐cell, which drives cytokinesis and recruits numerous other proteins to the division site. These proteins are involved in Z‐ring constriction, inner‐ and outer‐membrane invagination, peptidoglycan remodelling and daughter cell separation. Three papers in this issue of Molecular Microbiology, from the teams of Lucy Shapiro, Martin Thanbichler and Christine Jacobs‐Wagner, describe a novel protein, called DipM for Division Involved Protein with LysM domains, that is required for cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. DipM localizes to the mid‐cell during cell division, where it is necessary for the hydrolysis of the septal peptidoglycan to remodel the cell wall. Loss of DipM results in severe defects in cell envelope constriction, which is deleterious under fast‐growth conditions. State‐of‐the‐art microscopy experiments reveal that the peptidoglycan is thicker and that the cell wall is incorrectly organized in DipM‐depleted cells compared with wild‐type cells, demonstrating that DipM is essential for reorganizing the cell wall at the division site, for envelope invagination and cell separation in Caulobacter.     

Agrobacterium tumefaciens divisome proteins regulate the transition from polar growth to cell division

The mechanisms that restrict peptidoglycan biosynthesis to the pole during elongation and re‐direct peptidoglycan biosynthesis to mid‐cell during cell division in polar‐growing Alphaproteobacteria are largely unknown. Here, we explore the role of early division proteins of Agrobacterium tumefaciens including three FtsZ homologs, FtsA and FtsW in the transition from polar growth to mid‐cell growth and ultimately cell division. Although two of the three FtsZ homologs localize to mid‐cell, exhibit GTPase activity and form co‐polymers, only one, FtsZ_AT, is required for cell division. We find that FtsZ_AT is required not only for constriction and cell separation, but also for initiation of peptidoglycan synthesis at mid‐cell and cessation of polar peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Depletion of FtsZ_AT in A. tumefaciens causes a striking phenotype: cells are extensively branched and accumulate growth active poles through tip splitting events. When cell division is blocked at a later stage by depletion of FtsA or FtsW, polar growth is terminated and ectopic growth poles emerge from mid‐cell. Overall, this work suggests that A. tumefaciens FtsZ makes distinct contributions to the regulation of polar growth and cell division.     

Stimulation of PgdA‐dependent peptidoglycan N‐deacetylation by GpsB‐PBP A1 in Listeria monocytogenes

Listeria monocytogenes and other pathogenic bacteria modify their peptidoglycan to protect it against enzymatic attack through the host innate immune system, such as the cell wall hydrolase lysozyme. During our studies on GpsB, a late cell division protein that controls activity of the bi‐functional penicillin binding protein PBP A1, we discovered that GpsB influences lysozyme resistance of L. monocytogenes as mutant strains lacking gpsB showed an increased lysozyme resistance. Deletion of pbpA1 corrected this effect, demonstrating that PBP A1 is also involved in this. Susceptibility to lysozyme mainly depends on two peptidoglycan modifying enzymes: The peptidoglycan N‐deacetylase PgdA and the peptidoglycan O‐acetyltransferase OatA. Genetic and biochemical experiments consistently demonstrated that the increased lysozyme resistance of the ΔgpsB mutant was PgdA‐dependent and OatA‐independent. Protein‐protein interaction studies supported the idea that GpsB, PBP A1 and PgdA form a complex in L. monocytogenes and identified the regions in PBP A1 and PgdA required for complex formation. These results establish a physiological connection between GpsB, PBP A1 and the peptidoglycan modifying enzyme PgdA. To our knowledge, this is the first reported link between a GpsB‐like cell division protein and factors important for escape from the host immune system.     

De‐O‐acetylation of peptidoglycan regulates glycan chain extension and affects in vivo survival of Neisseria meningitidis

Peptidoglycan O‐acetylation is a modification found in many bacteria. In Gram‐positive pathogens, it contributes to virulence by conferring resistance to host lysozyme. However, in Gram‐negative pathogens, its contribution to physiology and virulence is unknown. We examined the contribution of patA, patB and ape1 to peptidoglycan O‐acetylation in the major human pathogen Neisseria meningitidis (Nm). Using genetic expression of all possible combinations of the three genes in Escherichia coli and Nm, we confirmed that PatA and PatB were required for PG O‐acetylation, while ApeI removed the O‐acetyl group. ApeI was active on all O‐acetylated muropeptides produced by PatA and PatB during heterologous expression in E. coli and was also active on several PG structures in vitro. Interestingly, in Nm, ApeI was found to preferentially de‐O‐acetylate muropeptides with tripeptide stems (GM3), suggesting that its activity is highly regulated. Accordingly, de‐O‐acetylation of GM3 regulated glycan chain elongation and cell size. Additionally, the virulence of Nm lacking ApeI was drastically reduced suggesting that regulation of glycan chain length by O‐acetylation contributes to bacterial fitness in the host. Altogether, our results suggest that ApeI represents an attractive target for new drug development.     

Distinct localization of the complement C5b‐9 complex on Gram‐positive bacteria

The plasma proteins of the complement system fulfil important immune defence functions, including opsonization of bacteria for phagocytosis, generation of chemo‐attractants and direct bacterial killing via the Membrane Attack Complex (MAC or C5b‐9). The MAC is comprised of C5b, C6, C7, C8, and multiple copies of C9 that generate lytic pores in cellular membranes. Gram‐positive bacteria are protected from MAC‐dependent lysis by their thick peptidoglycan layer. Paradoxically, several Gram‐positive pathogens secrete small proteins that inhibit C5b‐9 formation. In this study, we found that complement activation on Gram‐positive bacteria in serum results in specific surface deposition of C5b‐9 complexes. Immunoblotting revealed that C9 occurs in both monomeric and polymeric (SDS‐stable) forms, indicating the presence of ring‐structured C5b‐9. Surprisingly, confocal microscopy demonstrated that C5b‐9 deposition occurs at specialized regions on the bacterial cell. On Streptococcus pyogenes, C5b‐9 deposits near the division septum whereas on Bacillus subtilis the complex is located at the poles. This is in contrast to C3b deposition, which occurs randomly on the bacterial surface. Altogether, these results show a previously unrecognized interaction between the C5b‐9 complex and Gram‐positive bacteria, whichmight ultimately lead to a new model of MAC assembly and functioning.     

Visualizing the production and arrangement of peptidoglycan in Gram‐positive cells

Decades of study have revealed the fine chemical structure of the bacterial peptidoglycan cell wall, but the arrangement of the peptidoglycan strands within the wall has been challenging to define. The application of electron cryotomography (ECT) and new methods for fluorescent labelling of peptidoglycan are allowing new insights into wall structure and synthesis. Two articles in this issue examine peptidoglycan structures in the model Gram‐positive species Bacillus subtilis. Beeby et al. combined visualization of peptidoglycan using ECT with molecular modelling of three proposed arrangements of peptidoglycan strands to identify the model most consistent with their data. They argue convincingly for a Gram‐positive wall containing multiple layers of peptidoglycan strands arranged circumferentially around the long axis of the rod‐shaped cell, an arrangement similar to the single layer of peptidoglycan in similarly shaped Gram‐negative cells. Tocheva et al. examined sporulating cells using ECT and fluorescence microscopy to demonstrate the continuous production of a thin layer of peptidoglycan around the developing spore as it is engulfed by the membrane of the adjacent mother cell. The presence of this peptidoglycan in the intermembrane space allows the refinement of a model for engulfment, which has been known to include peptidoglycan synthetic and lytic functions.     

Bacterial outer membrane constriction

The outer membrane of Gram‐negative bacteria is a crucial permeability barrier allowing the cells to survive a myriad of toxic compounds, including many antibiotics. This innate form of antibiotic resistance is compounded by the evolution of more active mechanisms of resistance such as efflux pumps, reducing the already limited number of clinically relevant treatments for Gram‐negative pathogens. During cell division Gram‐negative bacteria must coordinate constriction of the outer membrane in conjunction with other crucial layers of the cell envelope, the peptidoglycan cell wall and the inner membrane. Coordination is crucial in maintaining structural integrity of the envelope, and represents a highly vulnerable time for the cell as any failure can be fatal, if not least disadvantageous. However, the molecular mechanisms of cell division and how the biogenesis of the three layers is synchronised during constriction remain largely unknown. Perturbations of the outer membrane have been shown to increase the effectiveness of antibiotics in vitro, and so with improved understanding of this process we may be able to exploit this vulnerability and improve the effectiveness of antibiotic treatments. In this review the current knowledge of how Gram‐negative bacteria facilitate constriction of their outer membranes during cell division will be discussed.     

Roles for both FtsA and the FtsBLQ subcomplex in FtsN‐stimulated cell constriction in Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli FtsN is a bitopic membrane protein that is essential for triggering active cell constriction. A small periplasmic subdomain (^EFtsN) is required and sufficient for function, but its mechanism of action is unclear. We isolated extragenic ^EFtsN*‐suppressing mutations that restore division in cells producing otherwise non‐functional variants of FtsN. These mapped to the IC domain of FtsA in the cytoplasm and to small subdomains of the FtsB and FtsL proteins in the periplasm. All FtsB and FtsL variants allowed survival without ^EFtsN, but many then imposed a new requirement for interaction between the cytoplasmic domain of FtsN (^NFtsN) and FtsA. Alternatively, variants of FtsA, FtsB or FtsL acted synergistically to allow cell division in the complete absence of FtsN. Strikingly, moreover, substitution of a single residue in FtsB (E56) proved sufficient to rescue ΔftsN cells as well. In FtsN⁺ cells, ^EFtsN*‐suppressing mutations promoted cell fission at an abnormally small cell size, and caused cell shape and integrity defects under certain conditions. This and additional evidence support a model in which FtsN acts on either side of the membrane to induce a conformational switch in both FtsA and the FtsBLQ subcomplex to de‐repress septal peptidoglycan synthesis and membrane invagination.     

LytM factor Alr3353 affects filament morphology and cell–cell communication in the multicellular cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. PCC 7120

Heterocyst‐forming cyanobacteria are organized as multicellular filaments of tightly interacting, functionally specialized cells. N₂‐fixing heterocysts differentiate from vegetative cells under nitrogen limitation in a semi‐regular pattern along the filament. Diazotrophic growth requires metabolite exchange between neighboring cells within the filament. This exchange occurs via cell–cell junction complexes that span the gap between the plasma membranes and thereby cross the septal peptidoglycan through an array of uniform nanopores formed by AmiC‐type cell wall hydrolases. We investigated how the lytic hydrolase AmiC1 (Alr0092) from Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, whose activity needs to be tightly controlled to avoid cell lysis, is regulated by the LytM factor Alr3353. Inactivation of alr3353 resulted in significantly fewer nanopores and as a consequence, a lower rate of fluorescent tracer exchange between cells. The mutant was not able to grow with N₂ as sole nitrogen source, although heterocysts were formed. Alr3353 localized mainly to fully developed intercellular septa of vegetative cells. The purified protein bound to peptidoglycan and enhanced the hydrolytic activity of AmiC1 in vitro. Our data show that the LytM factor Alr3353 regulates nanopore formation and cell–cell communication by directly interacting with AmiC1.     

Bacterial membrane vesicles deliver peptidoglycan to NOD1 in epithelial cells

Gram‐negative bacterial peptidoglycan is specifically recognized by the host intracellular sensor NOD1, resulting in the generation of innate immune responses. Although epithelial cells are normally refractory to external stimulation with peptidoglycan, these cells have been shown to respond in a NOD1‐dependent manner to Gram‐negative pathogens that can either invade or secrete factors into host cells. In the present work, we report that Gram‐negative bacteria can deliver peptidoglycan to cytosolic NOD1 in host cells via a novel mechanism involving outer membrane vesicles (OMVs). We purified OMVs from the Gram‐negative mucosal pathogens: Helicobacter pylori, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Neisseria gonorrhoea and demonstrated that these peptidoglycan containing OMVs upregulated NF‐κB and NOD1‐dependent responses in vitro. These OMVs entered epithelial cells through lipid rafts thereby inducing NOD1‐dependent responses in vitro. Moreover, OMVs delivered intragastrically to mice‐induced innate and adaptive immune responses via a NOD1‐dependent but TLR‐independent mechanism. Collectively, our findings identify OMVs as a generalized mechanism whereby Gram‐negative bacteria deliver peptidoglycan to cytosolic NOD1. We propose that OMVs released by bacteria in vivo may promote inflammation and pathology in infected hosts.     

DipM,a new factor required for peptidoglycan remodelling during cell division in Caulobacter crescentus

In bacteria, cytokinesis is dependent on lytic enzymes that facilitate remodelling of the cell wall during constriction. In this work, we identify a thus far uncharacterized periplasmic protein, DipM, that is required for cell division and polarity in Caulobacter crescentus. DipM is composed of four peptidoglycan binding (LysM) domains and a C‐terminal lysostaphin‐like (LytM) peptidase domain. It binds to isolated murein sacculi in vitro, and is recruited to the site of constriction through interaction with the cell division protein FtsN. Mutational analyses showed that the LysM domains are necessary and sufficient for localization of DipM, while its peptidase domain is essential for function. Consistent with a role in cell wall hydrolysis, DipM was found to interact with purified murein sacculi in vitro and to induce cell lysis upon overproduction. Its inactivation causes severe defects in outer membrane invagination, resulting in a significant delay between cytoplasmic compartmentalization and final separation of the daughter cells. Overall, these findings indicate that DipM is a periplasmic component of the C. crescentus divisome that facilitates remodelling of the peptidoglycan layer and, thus, coordinated constriction of the cell envelope during the division process.     

Colocalization and interaction between elongasome and divisome during a preparative cell division phase in Escherichia coli

The rod‐shaped bacterium Escherichia coli grows by insertion of peptidoglycan into the lateral wall during cell elongation and synthesis of new poles during cell division. The monofunctional transpeptidases PBP2 and PBP3 are part of specialized protein complexes called elongasome and divisome, respectively, which catalyse peptidoglycan extension and maturation. Endogenous immunolabelled PBP2 localized in the cylindrical part of the cell as well as transiently at midcell. Using the novel image analysis tool Coli‐Inspector to analyse protein localization as function of the bacterial cell age, we compared PBP2 localization with that of other E. coli cell elongation and division proteins including PBP3. Interestingly, the midcell localization of the two transpeptidases overlaps in time during the early period of divisome maturation. Försters Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) experiments revealed an interaction between PBP2 and PBP3 when both are present at midcell. A decrease in the midcell diameter is visible after 40% of the division cycle indicating that the onset of new cell pole synthesis starts much earlier than previously identified by visual inspection. The data support a new model of the division cycle in which the elongasome and divisome interact to prepare for cell division.     

Structure of bacteriophage SPN1S endolysin reveals an unusual two‐module fold for the peptidoglycan lytic and binding activity

Bacteriophage SPN1S infects the pathogenic Gram‐negative bacterium Salmonella typhimurium and expresses endolysin for the release of phage progeny by degrading peptidoglycan of the host cell walls. Bacteriophage SPN1S endolysin exhibits high glycosidase activity against peptidoglycans, resulting in antimicrobial activity against a broad range of outer membrane‐permeabilized Gram‐negative bacteria. Here, we report a crystal structure of SPN1S endolysin, indicating that unlike most endolysins from Gram‐negative bacteria background, the α‐helical protein consists of two modular domains, a large and a small domain, with a concave groove between them. Comparison with other structurally homologous glycoside hydrolases indicated a possible peptidoglycan binding site in the groove, and the presence of a catalytic dyad in the vicinity of the groove, one residue in a large domain and the other in a junction between the two domains. The catalytic dyad was further validated by antimicrobial activity assay against outer membrane‐permeabilized Escherichia coli. The three‐helix bundle in the small domain containing a novel class of sequence motif exhibited binding affinity against outer membrane‐permeabilized E. coli and was therefore proposed as the peptidoglycan‐binding domain. These structural and functional features suggest that endolysin from a Gram‐negative bacterial background has peptidoglycan‐binding activity and performs glycoside hydrolase activity through the catalytic dyad.     

The crystal structure of the cell division amidase AmiC reveals the fold of the AMIN domain,a new peptidoglycan binding domain

Binary fission is the ultimate step of the prokaryotic cell cycle. In Gram‐negative bacteria like Escherichia coli, this step implies the invagination of three biological layers (cytoplasmic membrane, peptidoglycan and outer membrane), biosynthesis of the new poles and eventually, daughter cells separation. The latter requires the coordinated action of the N‐acetylmuramyl‐L‐alanine amidases AmiA/B/C and their LytM activators EnvC and NlpD to cleave the septal peptidoglycan. We present here the 2.5 Å crystal structure of AmiC which includes the first report of an AMIN domain structure, a β‐sandwich of two symmetrical four‐stranded β‐sheets exposing highly conserved motifs on the two outer faces. We show that this N‐terminal domain, involved in the localization of AmiC at the division site, is a new peptidoglycan‐binding domain. The C‐terminal catalytic domain shows an auto‐inhibitory alpha helix obstructing the active site. AmiC lacking this helix exhibits by itself an activity comparable to that of the wild type AmiC activated by NlpD. We also demonstrate the interaction between AmiC and NlpD by microscale thermophoresis and confirm the importance of the active site blocking alpha helix in the regulation of the amidase activity.     

A role for FtsA in SPOR‐independent localization of the essential Escherichia coli cell division protein FtsN

FtsN is a bitopic membrane protein and the last essential component to localize to the Escherichia coli cell division machinery, or divisome. The periplasmic SPOR domain of FtsN was previously shown to localize to the divisome in a self‐enhancing manner, relying on the essential activity of FtsN and the peptidoglycan synthesis and degradation activities of FtsI and amidases respectively. Because FtsN has a known role in recruiting amidases and is predicted to stimulate the activity of FtsI, it follows that FtsN initially localizes to division sites in a SPOR‐independent manner. Here, we show that the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains of FtsN (FtsN_Cyto‐TM) facilitated localization of FtsN independently of its SPOR domain but dependent on the early cell division protein FtsA. In addition, SPOR‐independent localization preceded SPOR‐dependent localization, providing a mechanism for the initial localization of FtsN. In support of the role of FtsN_Cyto‐TM in FtsN function, a variant of FtsN lacking the cytoplasmic domain localized to the divisome but failed to complement an ftsN deletion unless it was overproduced. Simultaneous removal of the cytoplasmic and SPOR domains abolished localization and complementation. These data support a model in which FtsA–FtsN interaction recruits FtsN to the divisome, where it can then stimulate the peptidoglycan remodelling activities required for SPOR‐dependent localization.