Anatomy of the bacitracin resistance network in Bacillus subtilis

Protection against antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) often involves the parallel production of multiple, well‐characterized resistance determinants. So far, little is known about how these resistance modules interact and how they jointly protect the cell. Here, we studied the interdependence between different layers of the envelope stress response of Bacillus subtilis when challenged with the lipid II cycle‐inhibiting AMP bacitracin. The underlying regulatory network orchestrates the production of the ABC transporter BceAB, the UPP phosphatase BcrC and the phage‐shock proteins LiaIH. Our systems‐level analysis reveals a clear hierarchy, allowing us to discriminate between primary (BceAB) and secondary (BcrC and LiaIH) layers of bacitracin resistance. Deleting the primary layer provokes an enhanced induction of the secondary layer to partially compensate for this loss. This study reveals a direct role of LiaIH in bacitracin resistance, provides novel insights into the feedback regulation of the Lia system, and demonstrates a pivotal role of BcrC in maintaining cell wall homeostasis. The compensatory regulation within the bacitracin network can also explain how gene expression noise propagates between resistance layers. We suggest that this active redundancy in the bacitracin resistance network of B. subtilis is a general principle to be found in many bacterial antibiotic resistance networks.     

Autoinduction of a genetic locus encoding putative acyltransferase in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Corynebacterium glutamicum</Emphasis>

A genetic locus, encoding putative acyltransferase, was induced by autoinducers in Corynebacterium glutamicum. The autoinducers were maximally produced by the bacterium after 24 h culture. Those molecules are resistant to proteinase K treatment (300 μg ml⁻¹) for 30 min at 37°C or at 121°C for 15 min, and remained stable after extensive storage at 4°C. Autoinducers in the cell-free culture fluids from Corynebacterium ammoniagenes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa also induced the expression of acyltransferase in C. glutamicum, suggesting possible cross-recognition of the autoinducers by C. glutamicum. C. glutamicum thus possesses an autoinduction system which secretes autoinducers during growth, triggering the expression of downstream genes, exemplified by the putative acyltransferase gene.     

Unravelling the pleiotropic role of the MceG ATPase in Mycobacterium smegmatis

The Mce systems are complex ABC transporters that are encoded by different numbers of homologous operons in Actinobacteria. While the four Mce systems of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are all energized by a single ATPase, MceG, each system appears to import different fatty acids or sterols. To explore if this behaviour can be extended to saprophytic mycobacteria, whose more complex genomes encode more Mce systems, we have identified and characterized the MceG orthologue of Mycobacterium smegmatis. This bacterium relies on MceG to energize its six Mce systems that contribute to a variety of cellular functions including sterol uptake and cell envelope maintenance. In the absence of MceG, M. smegmatis was not able to utilize cholesterol or phytosterols as carbon sources implying that this ATPase is necessary to energize the Mce4‐sterol transport system. Other phenotypic alterations observed in the ΔMceG mutant, such as cell envelope modifications, suggest a pleiotropic functionality of the Mce systems that are particularly important for stress responses. Several ΔMceG phenotypes were recapitulated in a strain lacking only the unique C‐terminal region of MceG, suggesting an important functional or regulatory function for this domain.     

Solution structure of GSP13 from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bacillus subtilis</Emphasis> exhibits an S1 domain related to cold shock proteins

GSP13 encoded by gene yugI is a σ^B-dependent general stress protein in Bacillus subtilis, which can be induced by heat shock, salt stress, ethanol stress, glucose starvation, oxidative stress and cold shock. Here we report the solution structure of GSP13 and it is the first structure of S1 domain containing protein in Bacillus subtilis. The structure of GSP13 mainly consists of a typical S1 domain along with a C-terminal 50-residue flexible tail, different from the other known S1 domain containing proteins. Comparison with other S1 domain structures reveals that GSP13 has a conserved RNA binding surface, and it may function similarly to cold shock proteins in response to cold stress.     

The role of the CroR response regulator in resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to D‐cycloserine is defined using an inducible receiver domain

Enterococcus faecalis is an opportunistic multidrug‐resistant human pathogen causing severe nosocomial infections. Previous investigations revealed that the CroRS two‐component regulatory pathway likely displays a pleiotropic role in E. faecalis, involved in virulence, macrophage survival, oxidative stress response as well as antibiotic resistance. Therefore, CroRS represents an attractive potential new target for antibiotherapy. In this report, we further explored CroRS cellular functions by characterizing the CroR regulon: the ‘domain swapping’ method was applied and a CroR chimera protein was generated by fusing the receiver domain from NisR to the output domain from CroR. After demonstrating that the chimera CroR complements a croR gene deletion in E. faecalis (stress response, virulence), we conducted a global gene expression analysis using RNA‐Seq and identified 50 potential CroR targets involved in multiple cellular functions such as cell envelope homeostasis, substrate transport, cell metabolism, gene expression regulation, stress response, virulence and antibiotic resistance. For validation, CroR direct binding to several candidate targets was demonstrated by EMSA. Further, this work identified alr, the gene encoding the alanine racemase enzyme involved in E. faecalis resistance to D‐cycloserine, a promising antimicrobial drug to treat enterococcal infections, as a member of the CroR regulon.     

Contributions of the σW, σM and σX regulons to the lantibiotic resistome of Bacillus subtilis

In Bacillus subtilis, the extracytoplasmic function (ECF) σ factors σ^M, σ^W and σ^X all contribute to resistance against lantibiotics. Nisin, a model lantibiotic, has a dual mode of action: it inhibits cell wall synthesis by binding lipid II, and this complex also forms pores in the cytoplasmic membrane. These activities can be separated in a nisin hinge‐region variant (N20P M21P) that binds lipid II, but no longer permeabilizes membranes. The major contribution of σ^M to nisin resistance is expression of ltaSa, encoding a stress‐activated lipoteichoic acid synthase, and σ^X functions primarily by activation of the dlt operon controlling d ‐alanylation of teichoic acids. Together, σ^M and σ^X regulate cell envelope structure to decrease access of nisin to its lipid II target. In contrast, σ^W is principally involved in protection against membrane permeabilization as it provides little protection against the nisin hinge region variant. σ^W contributes to nisin resistance by regulation of a signal peptide peptidase (SppA), phage shock proteins (PspA and YvlC, a PspC homologue) and tellurite resistance related proteins (YceGHI). These defensive mechanisms are also effective against other lantibiotics such as mersacidin, gallidermin and subtilin and comprise an important subset of the intrinsic antibiotic resistome of B. subtilis.     

Overexpression and one‐step renaturation‐purification of the tagged creatinine deiminase of Corynebacterium glutamicum in Escherichia coli cells

The codA gene of Corynebacterium glutamicum PCM 1945 coding for a creatinine deiminase (CDI) (EC 3.5.4.21) has been amplified and cloned. The recombinant strain of Escherichia coli that overproduces the (His)₆‐tagged inactive CDI of C. glutamicum as inclusion bodies has been constructed. After solubilization of inclusion bodies in the presence of 0.3% N‐lauroylsarcosine, the enzyme was renaturated and purified by a single‐step procedure using metal‐affinity chromatography. The yield of the (His)₆‐tagged CDI is ~30 mg from 1 L culture. The purified enzyme is sufficiently stable under the conditions designed and possesses an activity of 10–20 U/mg. The main characteristics of the tagged enzyme remained similar to that of the natural enzyme.     

Phage Shock Protein C (PspC) of Yersinia enterocolitica Is a Polytopic Membrane Protein with Implications for Regulation of the Psp Stress Response

Phage shock proteins B (PspB) and C (PspC) are integral cytoplasmic membrane proteins involved in inducing the Yersinia enterocolitica Psp stress response. A fundamental aspect of these proteins that has not been studied in depth is their membrane topologies. Various in silico analyses universally predict that PspB is a bitopic membrane protein with the C terminus inside. However, similar analyses yield conflicting predictions for PspC: a bitopic membrane protein with the C terminus inside, a bitopic membrane protein with the C terminus outside, or a polytopic protein with both termini inside. Previous studies of Escherichia coli PspB-LacZ and PspC-PhoA fusion proteins supported bitopic topologies, with the PspB C terminus inside and the PspC C terminus outside. Here we have used a series of independent approaches to determine the membrane topologies of PspB and PspC in Y. enterocolitica. Our data support the predicted arrangement of PspB, with its C terminus in the cytoplasm. In contrast, data from multiple independent approaches revealed that both termini of PspC are located in the cytoplasm. Additional experiments suggested that the C terminus of PspC might be the recognition site for the FtsH protease and an interaction interface with PspA, both of which would be compatible with its newly proposed cytoplasmic location. This unexpected arrangement of PspC allows a new model for events underlying activation of the Psp response, which is an excellent fit with observations from various previous studies.     

Hfq reduces envelope stress by controlling expression of envelope‐localized proteins and protein complexes in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli

Gram‐negative bacteria possess several envelope stress responses that detect and respond to damage to this critical cellular compartment. The σ^E envelope stress response senses the misfolding of outer membrane proteins (OMPs), while the Cpx two‐component system is believed to detect the misfolding of periplasmic and inner membrane proteins. Recent studies in several Gram‐negative organisms found that deletion of hfq, encoding a small RNA chaperone protein, activates the σ^E envelope stress response. In this study, we assessed the effects of deleting hfq upon activity of the σ^E and Cpx responses in non‐pathogenic and enteropathogenic (EPEC) strains of Escherichia coli. We found that the σ^E response was activated in Δhfq mutants of all E. coli strains tested, resulting from the misregulation of OMPs. The Cpx response was activated by loss of hfq in EPEC, but not in E. coli K‐12. Cpx pathway activation resulted in part from overexpression of the bundle‐forming pilus (BFP) in EPEC Δhfq. We found that Hfq repressed expression of the BFP via PerA, a master regulator of virulence in EPEC. This study shows that Hfq has a more extensive role in regulating the expression of envelope proteins and horizontally acquired virulence genes in E. coli than previously recognized.     

The Choline-binding Protein PspC of Streptococcus pneumoniae Interacts with the C-terminal Heparin-binding Domain of Vitronectin

Adherence of Streptococcus pneumoniae is directly mediated by interactions of adhesins with eukaryotic cellular receptors or indirectly by exploiting matrix and serum proteins as molecular bridges. Pneumococci engage vitronectin, the human adhesive glycoprotein and complement inhibitor, to facilitate attachment to epithelial cells of the mucosal cavity, thereby modulating host cell signaling. In this study, we identified PspC as a vitronectin-binding protein interacting with the C-terminal heparin-binding domain of vitronectin. PspC is a multifunctional surface-exposed choline-binding protein displaying various adhesive properties. Vitronectin binding required the R domains in the mature PspC protein, which are also essential for the interaction with the ectodomain of the polymeric immunoglobulin receptor and secretory IgA. Consequently, secretory IgA competitively inhibited binding of vitronectin to purified PspC and to PspC-expressing pneumococci. In contrast, Factor H, which binds to the N-terminal part of mature PspC molecules, did not interfere with the PspC-vitronectin interaction. Using a series of vitronectin peptides, the C-terminal heparin-binding domain was shown to be essential for the interaction of soluble vitronectin with PspC. Binding experiments with immobilized vitronectin suggested a region N-terminal to the identified heparin-binding domain as an additional binding region for PspC, suggesting that soluble, immobilized, as well as cellularly bound vitronectin possesses different conformations. Finally, vitronectin bound to PspC was functionally active and inhibited the deposition of the terminal complement complex. In conclusion, this study identifies and characterizes (on the molecular level) the interaction between the pneumococcal adhesin PspC and the human glycoprotein vitronectin.     

Direct interaction between hnRNP‐M and CDC5L/PLRG1 proteins affects alternative splice site choice

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein‐M (hnRNP‐M) is an abundant nuclear protein that binds to pre‐mRNA and is a component of the spliceosome complex. A direct interaction was detected in vivo between hnRNP‐M and the human spliceosome proteins cell division cycle 5‐like (CDC5L) and pleiotropic regulator 1 (PLRG1) that was inhibited during the heat‐shock stress response. A central region in hnRNP‐M is required for interaction with CDC5L/PLRG1. hnRNP‐M affects both 5′ and 3′ alternative splice site choices, and an hnRNP‐M mutant lacking the CDC5L/PLRG1 interaction domain is unable to modulate alternative splicing of an adeno‐E1A mini‐gene substrate.