Small regulatory RNAs control the multi-cellular adhesive lifestyle of Escherichia coli

Small regulatory RNA molecules have recently been recognized as important regulatory elements of developmental processes in both eukaryotes and bacteria. We here describe a striking example in Escherichia coli that can switch between a single‐cell motile lifestyle and a multi‐cellular, sessile and adhesive state that enables biofilm formation on surfaces. For this, the bacterium needs to reprogramme its gene expression, and in many E. coli and Salmonella strains the lifestyle shift relies on control cascades that inhibit flagellar expression and activate the synthesis of curli, extracellular adhesive fibres important for co‐aggregation of cells and adhesion to biotic and abiotic surfaces. By combining bioinformatics, genetic and biochemical analysis we identified three small RNAs that act by an antisense mechanism to downregulate translation of CsgD, the master regulator of curli synthesis. Our demonstration that basal expression of each of the three RNA species is sufficient to downregulate CsgD synthesis and prevent curli formation indicates that all play a prominent role in the curli regulatory network. Our findings provide the first clue as to how the Rcs signalling pathway negatively regulates curli synthesis and increase the number of small regulatory RNAs that act directly on the csgD mRNA to five.     

Regulatory RNAs and the HptB/RetS signalling pathways fine‐tune Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis

Bacterial pathogenesis often depends on regulatory networks, two‐component systems and small RNAs (sRNAs). In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the RetS sensor pathway downregulates expression of two sRNAs, rsmY and rsmZ. Consequently, biofilm and the Type Six Secretion System (T6SS) are repressed, whereas the Type III Secretion System (T3SS) is activated. We show that the HptB signalling pathway controls biofilm and T3SS, and fine‐tunes P. aeruginosa pathogenesis. We demonstrate that RetS and HptB intersect at the GacA response regulator, which directly controls sRNAs production. Importantly, RetS controls both sRNAs, whereas HptB exclusively regulates rsmY expression. We reveal that HptB signalling is a complex regulatory cascade. This cascade involves a response regulator, with an output domain belonging to the phosphatase 2C family, and likely an anti‐anti‐σ factor. This reveals that the initial input in the Gac system comes from several signalling pathways, and the final output is adjusted by a differential control on rsmY and rsmZ. This is exemplified by the RetS‐dependent but HptB‐independent control on T6SS. We also demonstrate a redundant action of the two sRNAs on T3SS gene expression, while the impact on pel gene expression is additive. These features underpin a novel mechanism in the fine‐tuned regulation of gene expression.     

Transposon Mutagenesis Identifies Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Biofilm Factors

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC), which accounts for 85% of urinary tract infections (UTI), assembles biofilms in diverse environments, including the host. Besides forming biofilms on biotic surfaces and catheters, UPEC has evolved an intracellular pathogenic cascade that culminates in the formation of biofilm-like intracellular bacterial communities (IBCs) within bladder epithelial cells. Rapid bacterial replication during IBC formation augments a build-up in bacterial numbers and persistence within the host. Relatively little is known about factors mediating UPEC biofilm formation and how these overlap with IBC formation. To address this gap, we screened a UPEC transposon mutant library in three in vitro biofilm conditions: Luria broth (LB)-polyvinyl chloride (PVC), YESCA (yeast extract-Casamino Acids)-PVC, and YESCA-pellicle that are dependent on type 1 pili (LB) and curli (YESCA), respectively. Flagella are important in all three conditions. Mutants were identified that had biofilm defects in all three conditions but had no significant effects on the expression of type 1 pili, curli, or flagella. Thus, this approach uncovered a comprehensive inventory of novel effectors and regulators that are involved in UPEC biofilm formation under multiple conditions. A subset of these mutants was found to be dramatically attenuated and unable to form IBCs in a murine model of UTI. Collectively, this study expands our insights into UPEC multicellular behavior that may provide insights into IBC formation and virulence.     

Crystal structure of master biofilm regulator CsgD regulatory domain reveals an atypical receiver domain

The master regulator CsgD switches planktonic growth to biofilm formation by activating synthesis of curli fimbriae and cellulose in Enterobacteriaceae. CsgD was classified to be the LuxR response regulatory family, while its cognate sensor histidine kinase has not been identified yet. CsgD consists of a C‐terminal DNA binding domain and an N‐terminal regulatory domain that provokes the upstream signal transduction to further modulate its function. We provide the crystal structure of Salmonella Typhimurium CsgD regulatory domain, which reveals an atypical β5α5 response regulatory receiver domain folding with the α2 helix representing as a disorder loop compared to the LuxR/FixJ canonical response regulator, and the structure indicated a noteworthy α5 helix similar to the non‐canonical master regulator VpsT receiver domain α6. CsgD regulatory domain assembles with two dimerization interfaces mainly through α1 and α5, which has shown similarity to the c‐di‐GMP independent and stabilized dimerization interface of VpsT from Vibrio cholerae respectively. The potential phosphorylation site D59 is directly involved in the interaction of interfaces I and mutagenesis studies indicated that both dimerization interfaces could be crucial for CsgD activity. The structure reveals important molecular details for the dimerization assembly of CsgD and will shed new insight into its regulation mechanism.     

Small RNA interactome of pathogenic E. coli revealed through crosslinking of RNase E

RNA sequencing studies have identified hundreds of non‐coding RNAs in bacteria, including regulatory small RNA (sRNA). However, our understanding of sRNA function has lagged behind their identification due to a lack of tools for the high‐throughput analysis of RNA–RNA interactions in bacteria. Here we demonstrate that in vivo sRNA–mRNA duplexes can be recovered using UV‐crosslinking, ligation and sequencing of hybrids (CLASH). Many sRNAs recruit the endoribonuclease, RNase E, to facilitate processing of mRNAs. We were able to recover base‐paired sRNA–mRNA duplexes in association with RNase E, allowing proximity‐dependent ligation and sequencing of cognate sRNA–mRNA pairs as chimeric reads. We verified that this approach captures bona fide sRNA–mRNA interactions. Clustering analyses identified novel sRNA seed regions and sets of potentially co‐regulated target mRNAs. We identified multiple mRNA targets for the pathotype‐specific sRNA Esr41, which was shown to regulate colicin sensitivity and iron transport in E. coli. Numerous sRNA interactions were also identified with non‐coding RNAs, including sRNAs and tRNAs, demonstrating the high complexity of the sRNA interactome.     

Small RNAs as regulators of primary and secondary metabolism in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pseudomonas</Emphasis> species

Small RNAs (sRNAs) exert important functions in pseudomonads. Classical sRNAs comprise the 4.5S, 6S, 10Sa and 10Sb RNAs, which are known in enteric bacteria as part of the signal recognition particle, a regulatory component of RNA polymerase, transfer–messenger RNA (tmRNA) and the RNA component of RNase P, respectively. Their homologues in pseudomonads are presumed to have analogous functions. Other sRNAs of pseudomonads generally have little or no sequence similarity with sRNAs of enteric bacteria. Numerous sRNAs repress or activate the translation of target mRNAs by a base-pairing mechanism. Examples of this group in Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the iron-repressible PrrF1 and PrrF2 sRNAs, which repress the translation of genes encoding iron-containing proteins, and PhrS, an anaerobically inducible sRNA, which activates the expression of PqsR, a regulator of the Pseudomonas quinolone signal. Other sRNAs sequester RNA-binding proteins that act as translational repressors. Examples of this group in P. aeruginosa include RsmY and RsmZ, which are central regulatory elements in the GacS/GacA signal transduction pathway, and CrcZ, which is a key regulator in the CbrA/CbrB signal transduction pathway. These pathways largely control the extracellular activities (including virulence traits) and the selection of the energetically most favourable carbon sources, respectively, in pseudomonads.     

High‐throughput sequencing of Hop stunt viroid‐derived small RNAs from cucumber leaves and phloem

Small RNA (sRNA)‐guided processes, referred to as RNA silencing, regulate endogenous and exogenous gene expression. In plants and some animals, these processes are noncell autonomous and can operate beyond the site of initiation. Viroids, the smallest self‐replicating plant pathogens known, are inducers, targets and evaders of this regulatory mechanism and, consequently, the presence of viroid‐derived sRNAs (vd‐sRNAs) is usually associated with viroid infection. However, the pathways involved in the biogenesis of vd‐sRNAs are largely unknown. Here, we analyse, by high‐throughput pyrosequencing, the profiling of the Hop stunt viroid (HSVd) vd‐sRNAs recovered from the leaves and phloem of infected cucumber (Cucumis sativus) plants. HSVd vd‐sRNAs are mostly 21 and 22 nucleotides in length and derived equally from plus and minus HSVd RNA strands. The widespread distribution of vd‐sRNAs across the genome reveals that the totality of the HSVd RNA genome contributes to the formation of vd‐sRNAs. Our sequence data suggest that viroid‐derived double‐stranded RNA functions as one of the main precursors of vd‐sRNAs. Remarkably, phloem vd‐sRNAs accumulated preferentially as 22‐nucleotide species with a consensus sequence over‐represented. This bias in size and sequence in the HSVd vd‐sRNA population recovered from phloem exudate suggests the existence of a selective trafficking of vd‐sRNAs to the phloem tissue of infected cucumber plants.     

Abrogation of ospAB constitutively activates the Rrp2‐RpoN‐RpoS pathway (sigmaN‐sigmaS cascade) in Borrelia burgdorferi

Molecular mechanisms underlying the reciprocal regulation of the two major surface lipoproteins and virulence factors of Borrelia burgdorferi, OspA and OspC, are not fully understood. Herein, we report that inactivation of the ospAB operon resulted in overproduction of OspC and many other lipoproteins via the constitutive activation of the Rrp2‐RpoN‐RpoS pathway. Complementing the ospAB mutant with a wild‐type copy of ospA, but not an ospA variant that lacks the lipoprotein signal sequence, restored normal regulation of the Rrp2‐RpoN‐RpoS pathway; these results indicate that the phenotype was not caused by spurious mutations. Interestingly, while most of the ospAB mutant clones displayed a constitutive ospC expression phenotype, some ospAB mutant clones showed little or no ospC expression. Further analyses revealed that this OspC‐negative phenotype was independent of abrogation of ospAB. While activation of the Rrp2‐RpoN‐RpoS pathway was recently shown to downregulate ospA, our findings suggest that reduction of OspA can also activate this pathway. We postulate that the activation of the Rrp2‐RpoN‐RpoS pathway and downregulation of OspA form a positive feedback loop that allows spirochaetes to produce and maintain a constant high level of OspC and other lipoproteins during tick feeding, a strategy that is critical for spirochaetal transmission and mammalian infection.