RFLP、RAPD、AFLP在水稻农垦58S和1514中多态性比较

本文用ＲＦＬＰ、ＲＡＰＤ和ＡＦＬＰ三种分子标记技术对农垦５８ＳＸ１５１４组合及其Ｆ２极性集团进行了分析,比较了它们多成性和阳性的比率,结果显示,三种分子标记的多态性和与目的基因连锁的阳性比率分别为１９．９３％,５．２３％;１１．１７％,０．７６％和８６．４７％,７．５２％。ＡＦＬＰ的多态性比率和阳性比率均为最高。分析探讨了三种分子标记技术的优缺点及其在区间高分辩率作图和筛选与目的基因连锁标记中的运     

光敏核不育水稻等位突变系的APLP分析

通过对NK58s和NK58F这一对光敏核不育水稻等位突变系的AFLP分析,比较了AFLP,RAPD及RFLP检测DINA多态性的相对效率。结果表明,这三种分子标记的DNA多态性检出效率依次为AFLP>RAPD>RFLP;找出了水稻AFLP分析的最适反应条件;通过AFLP和集群混合分析(Bulked segregating analysis,BSA),筛选出了一批与水稻光敏核不育(PGMS)基因连锁的多态性AFLP产物,已完成了对4个多态性AFLP产物的克隆,Southem杂交证明其中2个为单拷贝顺序,另外2个为低拷贝顺序。对上述三种分子标记各自的优缺点及它们在DNA多态性检测中的适用之处进行了分析探讨。     

SCoT分子标记在割手密遗传图谱构建中的应用

本研究以割手密GXS85-30×GXS87-16的杂交后代为材料,应用目标起始密码子多态性(SCoT)分子标记对杂交后代进行杂种鉴定,获得由157个单株组成的F1杂种群,同时对比SCoT、AFLP和SSR分子标记在割手密基因组多态性分析和获得分离标记的效果,证实SCoT在扩增DNA多态性上优于SSR分子标记,在获取分离标记上优于AFLP分子标记,验证了SCoT分子标记技术在割手密遗传分析中的应用效果,为割手密遗传分析和遗传图谱构建提供了一种新型高效的目的基因分子标记技术。     

光敏核不育水稻等位突变系的AFLP分析

通过对NK58S和NK58F这一对光敏核不育水稻等位突变系的AFLP分析,比较了AFLP,RAPD及RFLP检测DNA多态性的相对效率。结果表明,这三种分子标记的DNA多态性检出效率依次为AFLP>RAPD>RFLP;找出了水稻AFLP分析的最适反应条件;通过AFLP和集群混合分析(Bulked segregating analysis,BSA),筛选出了一批与水稻光敏核不育(PGMS)基因连锁的多态性AFLP产物,已完成了对4个多态性AFLP产物的克隆,Southern杂交证明其中2个为单拷贝顺序,另外2个为低拷贝顺序。对上述三种分子标记各自的优缺点及它们在DNA多态性检测中的适用之处进行了分析探讨。     

棉花2个多标记基因系及其杂交后代AFLP分析

应用AFLP分子标记技术,对陆地棉两个多标记基因系T582和T586及其杂交后代F1等进行了DNA多态性分析。结果表明:在58对EcoRI/MseI引物组合中,筛选出41对引物组合具有多态性,多态性的引物组合占筛选总组合的70.69%。AFLP分子标记具有高度的多态性,非常适于基因组差异较小的(棉花)材料之间的多态性筛选。采用聚丙烯酰胺银染法显带技术,AFLP进行PCR扩增能看到30~80条DNA亮带,且检测灵敏度高,可区别只相差十几个bp甚至几个bp大小的DNA片段。但AFLP标记以显性标记占绝对优势,共显性标记比率极少,故而难以区分种质的杂合和纯合,这是它的惟一不足之处。     

AFLP标记在研究家蚕遗传多态性方面的应用

AFLP是一种多态检出效率很高的分子标记技术,在构建遗传图谱,遗传多态性研究,重建分子系统演化树,品种鉴定,基因克隆等众多研究领域有着其它分子标记技术不可比拟的优势。本文在前人用AFLP技术对植物多态性研究的基础上,将AFLP用于家蚕的遗传多态性研究,结果发现在家蚕中同样具有丰富的AFLP标记的多态性。由此暗示AFLP技术亦适合研究家蚕等昆虫类动物的遗传多态性,构建遗传图谱,或用于其分子生态学,分子进化和分类等方面的研究。此外本文还探讨了适合于家蚕等昆虫的AFLP分析的实验条件。     

DNA分子标记在实验动物遗传分析中的应用

DNA分子标记技术很多,基本都是建立在RFLP、PCR和重复顺序的基础上的。本文重点介绍了限制性片段长度多态性（RFLP）标记、随机扩增多态性DNA（RAPD）标记、微卫星DNA（STR）标记、DNA指纹（DFP）标记、扩增片段长度多态性（AFLP）标记等几种重要的DNA分子标记技术的定义、结构、分布、组成、保守性、优点及丰富的多态性等。并重点介绍了微卫星DNA（STR）标记在分子遗传监测、遗传多样性分析和遗传血缘关系及个体识别等领域的应用。     

AFLP和RAPD标记技术在栉孔扇贝遗传多样性研究中的应用比较

AFLP和RAPD标记技术是近年来发展最快的基于PCR基础上的两种DNA标记技术,本文比较了两种标记技术在我国栉孔扇贝群体遗传多样性研究中的应用。共筛选20个RAPD引物和7个AFLP引物组合,检测到AFLP标记的有效等位基因数和平均多态信息量稍低于RAPD标记,但AFLP标记在每单位分析中扩增到的野生和养殖群体的多态性条带数(23．8,24．8)分别高于RAPD标记(5．6,5．6),AFLP多态性检测效率显著高于RAPD标记。AFLP和RAPD两种标记技术所揭示的野生种群与养殖群体间的近交系数、遗传距离两项指标均表明,我国栉孔扇贝养殖群体和野生种群之间尚未出现明显的遗传分化。研究结果表明：RAPD和AFLP这两种标记技术均可用于栉孔扇贝遗传多样性的分析,其分析结果是一致的。     

AFLP分子标记技术在中药研究中的应用进展

AFLP(扩增片段长度多态性)分子标记技术是一种结合了RFLP和PCR技术的新型分子标记技术,在药物研究领域的应用日趋广泛。简述了AFLP分子标记技术的基本原理、技术特点与优势,重点阐明其在中药研究中的应用进展,并对其前景进行了讨论与展望。     

基于RAPD、ISSR和AFLP对西瓜枯萎病菌遗传多样性的评价

利用RAPD、ISSR和AFLP分子标记技术对50个西瓜枯萎病菌株进行了分析。结果表明,21个RAPD引物、21个ISSR引物和21对AFLP引物分别对供试菌株扩增出113、134和389条带,三种分子标记的遗传相似系数比较一致,均可揭示西瓜枯萎病菌的遗传变异特点。三种分子标记产生的聚类分析结果存在一定差异,其中RAPD类群与生理小种和地理来源之间均不存在明显关系;而AFLP和ISSR类群与生理小种之间存在一定相关性,与菌株的地理来源关系不明显.     

Primary Study of Rice AFLP Analysis-Optimization of Reaction Conditions and Analysis of Thermo sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Allelic Mutant Lines

AFLP analysis was performed between a pair of thermo-sensitive genic male sterile (TGMS) rice allelic mutant lines (5460S and 5460F). The reaction conditions for rice AFLP assay were optimized. The relative efficiencies for polymorphism detection of RFLP, RAPD and AFLP were compared. The results indicated that the efficiency for polymorphism detection in rice was in the order of AFLP > RAPD > RFLP, and also indicated that AFLP was a powerful DNA molecular marker technique for polymorphism detection, especially in the case of extremely low polymorphism, such as isogenic lines and allehc mutant hnes. Some of the AFLP products between the TGMS rice allehc mutant lines were cloned. Three of them were used as mixed probes to screen BAC library of rice line 5460S. 12 positive clones were screened out. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of these three molecular marker systems were discussed.     

水稻的AFLP研究初报——反应条件的优化及对温敏核不育等位突变系的分析

通过对５４６０Ｓ和５４６０Ｆ这一对水稻等位突变系的ＡＦＬＰ分析,比较了ＡＦＬＰ与ＲＡＰＤ及ＲＦＬＰ检测ＤＮＡ多态性的相对效率。结果表明,这３种分子标记的ＤＮＡ多态性检出效率依次为ＡＦＬＰ＞ＲＡＰＤ＞ＲＦＬＰ;找出了水稻ＡＦＬＰ分析的最适反应条件;在这对等位突变系之间找到了一些多态性ＡＦＬＰ产物,已完成了对４个多态性ＡＦＬＰ产物的克隆,其中３个为单拷贝顺序;用这３个单拷贝克隆的混合物为探针,对作者自己构建的５４６０Ｓ水稻的ＢＡＣ库进行了筛选,获得了１２个阳性克隆,为今后ＢＡＣ库的筛选打下了基础。此外,对上述３种分子标记各自的优缺点及它们在ＤＮＡ多态性检测中的适用之处进行了分析探讨。     

The comparison of RFLP,RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis

The utility of RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism), RAPD (random-amplified polymorphic DNA), AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) and SSR (simple sequence repeat, microsatellite) markers in soybean germplasm analysis was determined by evaluating information content (expected heterozygosity), number of loci simultaneously analyzed per experiment (multiplex ratio) and effectiveness in assessing relationships between accessions. SSR markers have the highest expected heterozygosity (0.60), while AFLP markers have the highest effective multiplex ratio (19). A single parameter, defined as the marker index, which is the product of expected heterozygosity and multiplex ratio, may be used to evaluate overall utility of a marker system. A comparison of genetic similarity matrices revealed that, if the comparison involved both cultivated (Glycine max) and wild soybean (Glycine soja) accessions, estimates based on RFLPs, AFLPs and SSRs are highly correlated, indicating congruence between these assays. However, correlations of RAPD marker data with those obtained using other marker systems were lower. This is because RAPDs produce higher estimates of interspecific similarities. If the comparisons involvedG. max only, then overall correlations between marker systems are significantly lower. WithinG. max, RAPD and AFLP similarity estimates are more closely correlated than those involving other marker systems.Abbreviations RFLP restriction fragment length plymorphism - RAPD random-amplified polymorphic DNA - AFLP amplified fragment length polymorphism - SSR simple sequence repeat - PCR polymerase chain reaction - TBE Tris-borate-EDTA buffer - MI marker index - SENA sum of effective numbers of alleles     

Comparison of PCR-based marker systems for the analysis of genetic relationships in cultivated potato

The application of AFLPs, RAPDs and SSRs to examine genetic relationships in the primary northwestern European cultivated potato gene pool was investigated. Sixteen potato cultivars were genotyped using five AFLP primer combinations, 14 RAPD primers, and 17 database-derived SSR primer pairs. All three approaches successfully discriminated between the 16 cultivars using a minimum of one assay. Similarity matrices produced for each marker type on the basis of Nei and Li coefficients showed low correlations when compared with different statistical tests. Dendrograms were produced from these data for each marker system. The usefulness of each system was examined in terms of number of loci revealed (effective multiplex ratio, or EMR) and the amount of polymorphism detected (diversity index, or DI). AFLPs had the highest EMR, and SSRs the highest DI. A single parameter, marker index (MI), which is the product of DI and EMR, was used to evaluate the overall utility of each marker system. The use of these PCR-based marker systems in potato improvement and statutory applications is discussed.Abbreviations: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; AFLP, amplified fragment length polymorphism; RAPD, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; EMR, effective multiplex ratio; DI, diversity index; MI, marker index; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism.     

Efficiency of RFLP, RAPD, and AFLP markers for the construction of an intraspecific map of the tomato genome.

We have constructed a tomato genetic linkage map based on an intraspecific cross between two inbred lines of Lycopersicon esculentum and L. esculentum var. cerasiforme. The segregating population was composed of 153 recombinant inbred lines. This map is comprised of one morphological, 132 RFLP (restriction fragment length polymorphism, including 16 known-function genes), 33 RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA), and 211 AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) loci. We compared the 3 types of markers for their polymorphism, segregation, and distribution over the genome. RFLP, RAPD, and AFLP methods revealed 8.7%, 15.8%, and 14.5% informative bands, respectively. This corresponded to polymorphism in 30% of RFLP probes, 32% of RAPD primers, and 100% of AFLP primer combinations. Less deviation from the 1:1 expected ratio was obtained with RFLP than with AFLP loci (8% and 18%, respectively). RAPD and AFLP markers were not randomly distributed over the genome. Most of them (60% and 80%, respectively) were grouped in clusters located around putative centromeric regions. This intraspecific map spans 965 cM with an average distance of 8.3 cM between markers (of the framework map). It was compared to other published interspecific maps of tomato. Despite the intraspecific origin of this map, it did not show any increase in length when compared to the high-density interspecific map of tomato.     

Avirulence gene and insertion element-based RFLP as well as RAPD markers reveal high levels of genomic polymorphism in the rice pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae

Genetic polymorphism within the genomes of bacterial pathogens determines their evolutionary potential during long-term interaction with their hosts. To investigate the level of genetic variation in Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo), the causative agent of rice bacterial blight disease, three DNA marker systems, including (i) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the avrBs3/PthA family genes (avrXa27), (ii) RFLP of insertion (IS) elements and (iii) random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers, were used to detect polymorphism among 32 Xoo strains that differed in their virulence patterns. All these strains contained multiple avrXa27 homologs that were variable in copy number and genomic location. RFLP of six IS elements revealed that these mobile sequences were abundant in Xoo genomes, with 150 of the total of 165 discernable markers being variable. Thirty-eight decamer primers of RAPD amplified a total of 691 bands, with 100% of them being variable. In addition, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of data from RFLP analysis of IS elements and from RAPD analysis showed that most of the genetic variation residues were within Xoo populations, rather than between populations. Although all three DNA marker systems supported that substantial variation was maintained in Xoo genomes, Mantel tests did not identify significant correlation between the similarity coefficients calculated from them. The results of the present study indicated that Xoo genomes contain a high level of genetic polymorphism, which greatly facilitates the evolution of this important pathogen during interaction with its host rice plant.     

中国食用向日葵种质资源遗传变异的RAPD及AFLP分析

本研究采用RAPD和AFLP方法对23个中国不同地区的食用向日葵（Helianthus annuus L.)骨干品种进行了遗传变异分析,同时对两种标记系统进行了比较。26个RAPD引物产生了总计192条DNA条带,大小分布 于0.26kb-1.98kb之间,其中165条（86．12％）具有多态性,每条引物产生DNA条带的平均数为7．38。8对AFLP引物组合共产生了576条带,分布于100bp-500bp之间,其中的341条具有多态性,多态百分率为76．00％,每对引物组合产生DNA条带的平均数为72。RAPD方法检测的每位点有效等位基因数（1．76）大于AFLP（1．65）,AFLP标记位点的平均多态性信息量（PIC）（0．38）低于RAPD标记位点PIC（0．41）,但AFLP标记具有很高的多态性检测效率（Ai=38．52）。用RAPD标记分析23个食用向日葵材料的亲缘关系,Nei氏相似性系数分布在47．84％－82．06％,平均相似性系数为0．6495,而采用AFLP的Nei氏相似性系数分布在54．15％－83．52％,平均相似性系数为0．6884。RAPD数据的标准差为0．13,而AFLP数据的标准差为0．08。因此,采用RAPD和AFLP方法分析食用向日葵遗传变异,RAPD标记具有较低相似性系数和较高方差而AFLP则相反。源于两种不同标记的遗传相似矩阵的相关系数为0．51,说明采用RAPD和AFLP系统分析食用向日葵遗传变异得到的结果有一定的相关性,无论采用RAPD还是AFLP标记进行聚类分析,都将23个不同基因型的食用向日葵材料分成了三个类群。