A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing endoscopic and open carpal tunnel decompression

Controversy exists regarding the benefit of endoscopic carpal tunnel release versus open carpal tunnel release in terms of grip/pinch strength, scar tenderness, pain, return to work, reversible/irreversible nerve damage, and adverse effects. Although a number of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews have been published on the subject, to date, no large definitive randomized controlled trial or meta-analysis has been performed comparing endoscopic to open carpal tunnel release. This meta-analysis was undertaken to address the effectiveness of endoscopic carpal tunnel release relative to open carpal tunnel release. Key outcome measures from 13 randomized controlled trials were extracted and statistically combined. Heterogeneity was observed in three of the outcomes (i.e., grip strength, pain, and return to work), but the causes of heterogeneity could not be explained because of insufficient detail in the reported studies. Using the Jadad et al. scale, nine of 13 studies were of low methodologic quality. The effect sizes were compared between the studies that were rated as high quality and the studies that were rated as low quality on the Jadad et al. scale. Similarly, the studies that were rated as high quality on the Gerritsen et al. scale were compared with those that were rated as low quality. No clinically significant difference in effect sizes was apparent between studies of high and low methodologic quality. This meta-analysis supports the conclusion that endoscopic carpal tunnel release is favored over the open carpal tunnel release in terms of a reduction in scar tenderness and increase in grip and pinch strength at a 12-week follow-up. With regard to symptom relief and return to work, the data are inconclusive. Irreversible nerve damage is uncommon in either technique; however, there is an increased susceptibility to reversible nerve injury that is three times as likely to occur with endoscopic carpal tunnel release than with open carpal tunnel release.     

A comparison of flexor tenosynovectomy, open carpal tunnel release, and open carpal tunnel release with flexor tenosynovectomy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

The purpose of this study was to identify the advantages and disadvantages of performing a flexor tenosynovectomy without dividing the transverse carpal ligament, an open carpal tunnel release, and an open carpal tunnel release with flexor tenosynovectomy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. From 1990 to 1998, a retrospective study was done in which a flexor tenosynovectomy was performed in 133 patients without division of the transverse carpal ligament and compared with 68 patients who had an open carpal tunnel release and 75 patients who had an open carpal tunnel release and flexor tenosynovectomy. Patients were followed up for an average period of 30 weeks with history and physical findings and nerve conduction velocities and for an average period of 2.6 years with telephone interviews. There was a 2.3 percent incidence of pillar pain in the flexor tenosynovectomy group, which may explain the earlier return to their regular jobs at an average time of 9.9 weeks, compared with 10.7 weeks for the carpal tunnel release group and 12.0 weeks for the carpal tunnel release/flexor tenosynovectomy group. The latter two groups had an incidence of pillar pain of 12.1 percent and 25.3 percent, respectively. Postoperative grip strength was statistically significantly improved in the flexor tenosynovectomy group compared with the other two groups, where adjustments were made for sex and preoperative grip strengths with standard error of adjusted means. In the flexor tenosynovectomy group, 20.6 percent of patients had a previous open or endoscopic carpal tunnel release with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, compared with 5.2 percent in the open carpal tunnel release group and 21.6 percent in the open carpal tunnel release with flexor tenosynovectomy group. Excisional biopsies of flexor tenosynovium in the flexor tenosynovectomy, open carpal tunnel release, and open carpal tunnel release with flexor tenosynovectomy groups revealed an incidence of fibrosis in 89.2 percent, 88.9 percent, and 87.7 percent of specimens, respectively. Edema was a frequent finding, but an active inflammatory response was seldom seen. The findings in this study indicate that because of a significant decrease in pillar pain, a flexor tenosynovectomy in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome would likely benefit workers who use the palm of the hand in heavy manual or highly repetitive work by allowing them to return to regular duty sooner.     

Clinical experience with the CO2 laser during carpal tunnel decompression

Scar tissue formation along the cut edges of the transverse carpal ligament has been found to be among the primary causes for persistent median nerve compression following carpal tunnel release with the steel scalpel. Since laser surgery has been shown to be effective in reducing incisional inflammatory reactions, hypertrophic scarring, and postoperative pain and edema, in achieving better hemostasis, the application of the carbon dioxide laser may be a more efficient surgical tool than the steel scalpel for carpal tunnel release. In 46 cases of carpal tunnel syndrome, the carbon dioxide laser was utilized to vaporize the transverse carpal ligament and seal its edges. The patients were then reevaluated at 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. No intraoperative complications were encountered. Patients reported minimal postoperative pain, rapid return of sensibility, decreased paresthesia, and increased motor function. After 2 years, there have been no recurrent symptoms of median nerve compression in these patients.     

The incidence of recurrence after endoscopic carpal tunnel release

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release has been used to decompress the median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome for over the past decade, with an advantage (over the traditional "open" release) being decreased pain in the postoperative period. The goals of this study were to attempt to define the recurrence rate after endoscopic carpal tunnel release and to determine if it differs from that of open technique. The charts of 191 consecutive carpal tunnel syndrome patients treated operatively at the University of Missouri were reviewed. For this study, recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome was defined as documented cases in which the symptoms had resolved following surgical release but subsequently recurred, requiring surgical rerelease of the carpal tunnel. All endoscopic releases were performed using the Chow two-portal technique. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. A total of 103 patient hands had open carpal tunnel releases; 88 were endoscopically released. Total follow-up time (from the initial release) averaged 29 months for the open group and 22 months for the endoscopic group. There were no recurrences in the open group and six recurrences in the endoscopic group (7 percent, p = 0.008). All six recurrences were in worker's compensation patients. The median time between endoscopic release and rerelease was 8.5 months. There seems to be a statistically higher incidence of recurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome after endoscopic release compared with the traditional "open" release in our cases. Although the pathogenesis of this increased rate of recurrence is not clear, this should be considered when planning surgical release of the volar carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome.     

Aneurysm of the median artery causing recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome and anatomic review

A patient is presented who had recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms in his left hand 1 year after having undergone release of the transverse carpal ligament. On exploration, this was found to be due to an aneurysm of a median artery and possibly scarring due to this compression around the branches of the bifurcated median nerve. This represents the first case in the literature to comment on (1) the absence of bilaterality of the anatomic finding and (2) carpal tunnel syndrome relative to median artery aneurysm. With this in mind, a plea is made for careful exploration of the carpal tunnel, maintaining an incision as far to the ulnar side of the median nerve as technically possible with thorough visualization of the contents of the tunnel and any anatomic variance involved. The incidence of the combination of aberrant median artery with high bifurcation of the median nerve is unknown, as is the incidence of aneurysm of the median artery.     

Myoepithelioma within the carpal tunnel: a case report and review of the literature

Myoepitheliomas of the extremity are rare and usually benign, while a minority display malignant features. This case demonstrates the diagnosis and management of myoepithelioma within the carpal tunnel. Clinical and radiological tumour features were evaluated. Hematoxylin and eosin stained tumour sections were examined, and immunohistochemistry was performed. Histology revealed a nodular mass of epithelioid cells in clusters within a myxoid/chondroid stroma. No mitoses were noted. Cytokeratins, neuron-specific enolase, synaptophysin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and S100 were positive on immunohistochemistry. A literature review revealed very few prior reports of myoepithelioma in the wrist, and limited data concerning any relationship between recurrence and quality of surgical margins. In this case, wide local excision would have significantly compromised dominant hand function, and therefore a marginal excision was deemed appropriate in the context of bland histological features. Surgical margins noted in future case reports will aid clinical decision making.     

The effectiveness of evidence summaries on health policymakers and health system managers use of evidence from systematic reviews: a systematic review

Background

Systematic reviews are important for decision makers. They offer many potential benefits but are often written in technical language, are too long, and do not contain contextual details which make them hard to use for decision-making. There are many organizations that develop and disseminate derivative products, such as evidence summaries, from systematic reviews for different populations or subsets of decision makers. This systematic review aimed to (1) assess the effectiveness of evidence summaries on policymakers’ use of the evidence and (2) identify the most effective summary components for increasing policymakers’ use of the evidence. We present an overview of the available evidence on systematic review derivative products.

Methods

We included studies of policymakers at all levels as well as health system managers. We included studies examining any type of “evidence summary,” “policy brief,” or other products derived from systematic reviews that presented evidence in a summarized form. The primary outcomes were the (1) use of systematic review summaries in decision-making (e.g., self-reported use of the evidence in policymaking and decision-making) and (2) policymakers’ understanding, knowledge, and/or beliefs (e.g., changes in knowledge scores about the topic included in the summary). We also assessed perceived relevance, credibility, usefulness, understandability, and desirability (e.g., format) of the summaries.

Results

Our database search combined with our gray literature search yielded 10,113 references after removal of duplicates. From these, 54 were reviewed in full text, and we included six studies (reported in seven papers) as well as protocols from two ongoing studies. Two studies assessed the use of evidence summaries in decision-making and found little to no difference in effect. There was also little to no difference in effect for knowledge, understanding or beliefs (four studies), and perceived usefulness or usability (three studies). Summary of findings tables and graded entry summaries were perceived as slightly easier to understand compared to complete systematic reviews. Two studies assessed formatting changes and found that for summary of findings tables, certain elements, such as reporting study event rates and absolute differences, were preferred as well as avoiding the use of footnotes.

Conclusions

Evidence summaries are likely easier to understand than complete systematic reviews. However, their ability to increase the use of systematic review evidence in policymaking is unclear.

Trial registration

The protocol was published in the journal Systematic Reviews (2015;4:122)

     

Genetic linkage analysis of the carpal tunnel syndrome

Two generations of a family with autosomal dominant carpal tunnel syndrome were studied for genetic linkage to 20 informative polymorphic blood markers. No linkage was demonstrated between the syndrome and the markers tested; exclusion of close linkage (lod score less than -2.0) was found for MNSs, ACP, GALT, GPT, GLO, Hp, Gc, and Pi.