Rapid attractant-induced changes in methylation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Bacillus subtilis

In Bacillus subtilis, addition of chemotactic attractant causes an immediate change in distribution of methyl groups on methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs), whereas in Escherichia coli, it causes changes that occur throughout the adaptation period. Thus, methylation changes in B. subtilis are probably related to excitation, not adaptation. If labeled cells are exposed to excess nonradioactive methionine, then attractant causes immediate 50% delabeling of the MCPs, suggesting that a flux of methyl groups through the MCPs occurs. Methanol is given off at a high rate during the adaptation period and probably reflects demethylation of some substance to bring about adaptation. The fact that many radioactive methyl groups are lost immediately from the MCPs but only slowly arise as methanol is consistent with the hypothesis that they are transferred from the MCPs to a carrier from which methanol arises. Demethylation of this carrier may cause adaptation.     

Demethylation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli induced by the repellents glycerol and ethylene glycol.

The addition of glycerol or ethylene glycol caused not only severe tumbling but also a drastic decrease in the methylation level of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) in Escherichia coli. Experiments with various mutants having defects in their MCPs showed that the demethylation occurred in all three kinds of MCPs, MCPI, II, and III. The addition of an attractant to the glycerol- or ethylene glycol-treated cells resulted in a distinct increase in the methylation level of the relevant MCP, indicating that glycerol and ethylene glycol do not directly damage the methylation-demethylation system in the cell. The time courses of adaptation and MCP demethylation upon addition of these repellents were consistent with each other. Furthermore, both the response time and the extent of MCP demethylation were increased in parallel with increasing concentrations of glycerol or ethylene glycol. These results indicate that the adaptation to these repellents is performed by the demethylation of MCPs. Thus, glycerol and ethylene glycol are novel repellents, which utilize not just one but all three kinds of MCPs for both information processing and adaptation.     

Effect of methionine on chemotaxis by Bacillus subtilis.

Bacillus subtilis, like Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, carries out chemotaxis by modulating the relative frequency of smooth swimming and tumbling. Like these enteric bacteria, methionine auxotrophs starved for methionine show an abnormally long-period of smooth swimming after addition of attractant. This "hypersensitive" state requires an hour of starvation for its genesis, which can be hastened by including alanine, a strong attractant, in starvation medium. Susceptibility to repellent, which causes transient tumbling when added, if anything, increases slightly by starvation for methionine. The results are interpreted by postulating the existence of a methionine-derived structure that hastens recovery of attractant-stimulated bacteria back to normal.     

Novel methyl transfer during chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis

If Bacillus subtilis is incubated in radioactive methionine in the absence of protein synthesis, the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) become radioactively methylated. If the bacteria are further incubated in excess nonradioactive methionine ("cold-chased") and then given the attractant aspartate, the MCPs lose about half of their radioactivity due to turnover, in which lower specific activity methyl groups from S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) replace higher specific activity ones. Due to the cold-chase, the specific activity of the AdoMet pool is reduced at least 2-fold. If, later, the attractant is removed, higher specific activity methyl groups return to the MCPs. Thus, there must exist an unidentified methyl carrier that can "reversibly" receive methyl groups from the MCPs. In a similar experiment, labeled cells were transferred to a flow cell and exposed to addition and removal of attractant and of repellent. All four kinds of stimuli were found to cause methanol production. Bacteria with maximally labeled MCPs were exposed to many cycles of addition and removal of attractant; the maximum amount of radioactive methanol was evolved on the third, not the first, cycle. This result suggests that there is a precursor-product relationship between methyl groups on the MCPs and on the unidentified carrier, which might be the direct source of methanol. However, since no methanol was produced when a methyltransferase mutant, whose MCPs were unmethylated, was exposed to addition and removal of attractant or repellent, the methanol must ultimately derive from methylated MCPs.     

Aberrant regulation of methylesterase activity in cheD chemotaxis mutants of Escherichia coli

The adaptation process in several cheD chemotaxis mutants, which carry defects in tsr, the serine transducer gene, was examined. cheD mutants are smooth swimming and generally nonchemotactic; the defect is dominant to the wild-type tsr gene (J. S. Parkinson, J. Bacteriol. 142:953-961, 1980). All classes of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins synthesized in unstimulated cheD strains are overmethylated relative to the wild type. We found that the steady-state rate of demethylation in cheD mutants was low; this may explain their overmethylated phenotype. In addition, all cheD mutants showed diminished responsiveness of methylesterase activity to attractant and repellent stimuli transduced by either the Tsr or Tar protein, and they did not adapt. These results suggest that the dominant nature of the cheD mutations is manifested as a general defect in the regulation of demethylation. Some of these altered properties of methylesterase activity in cheD mutants were exhibited in wild-type cells that were treated with saturating concentrations of serine. The mutant Tsr protein thus seems to be locked into a signaling mode that suppresses tumbling and inhibits methylesterase activity in a global fashion. We found that the Tar and mutant Tsr proteins synthesized in cheD strains were methylated and deamidated at the correct sites and that the mutations were not located in the methylated peptides. Thus, the signaling properties of the transducers may be controlled at sites distinct from the methyl-accepting sites.     

The lifetime of photosensory signals in Halobacterium halobium and its dependence on protein methylation

Halobacteria spontaneously reverse their swimming direction about every 10 s. This behavioral pattern is transiently disturbed upon stimulation through sensory photosystems of different spectral sensitivity. As a result of stimulation, a single swimming interval is either prolonged (attractant response) or shortened (repellent response). Thereafter the cell returns to its autonomous reversal rhythm, i.e., it quickly adapts. Method are presented to determine the lifetime of repellent as well as of attractant cellular signals at the site of signal integration, using particular stimulation programs. Independent of the photosystem through which the signals were generated, the total lifetime of a repellent signal was 1.3 s. The decay of the signal was rapid during the first 100 ms and slow thereafter. The lifetime of an attractant signal was about 4 s and likewise did not depend on the photosystems. The degree of methylation of membrane proteins was increased by attractant stimuli and decreased by repellent stimuli. Inhibition of protein methylation by homocysteine was accompanied by a slowdown of the decay of both the repellent and attractant signal. A mutant strain with an increased demethylation also gave increased signal lifetimes. A lowered Ca2+ concentration, which activates methylation in vivo, led to shortened signal lifetimes. Methylation is proposed to be the mechanism which limits the signal lifetime and thereby allows the cells to adapt.     

Methanol production during chemotaxis to amino acids in Bacillus subtilis

The 20 common amino acids act as attractants during chemotaxis by the Gram-positive organism Bacillus subtilis . In this study, we report that all amino acids induce B. subtilis to produce methanol both upon addition and removal of the chemoeffector. Asparagine-induced methanol production is specific to the McpB receptor and aspartate-induced methanol production correlates with receptor occupancy. These findings suggest that addition and removal of all amino acids cause demethylation of specific receptors which results in methanol production. We also demonstrate that certain attractants cause greater production of methanol after multiple stimulations. CheC and CheD, while affecting the levels of receptor methylation, are not absolutely required for either methylation or demethylation. In contrast, CheY is necessary for methanol formation upon removal of attractant but not upon addition of attractant. We conclude that methanol formation due to negative stimuli indicates the existence of a unique adaptational mechanism in B. subtilis involving the response regulator, CheY.     

Sequence and characterization of Bacillus subtilis CheW.

A Bacillus subtilis open reading frame (ORF) encoding a predicted polypeptide of 156 amino acids was subcloned and sequenced. The polypeptide was found to be homologous to CheW of Escherichia coli, sharing 28.6% amino acid identity. The ORF was verified by using a bacteriophage T7 expression system in E. coli. The gene was inactivated by insertion of a nonpolor chloramphenicol acetyltransferase cassette in its N-terminal region. In the absence of chemoeffectors, the mutant displayed a smooth swimming bias, with some tumbling. The CheW- mutant was defective on swarm plates but was complemented by a plasmid that expressed wild type CheW. Addition of attractant or repellent to the CheW- mutant resulted in transient smooth swimming or tumbling, respectively. However, capillary assays revealed that chemotaxis was substantially impaired in the mutant strain.     

A biochemical mechanism for bacterial chemotaxis

Peritrichous bacteria alternately swim and tumble (thrash about with little forward progress). By selective modulation of tumbling frequency, these bacteria carry out chemotaxis, which is migration to higher concentrations of attractant or lower concentrations of repellent. A model for chemotaxis is presented in which tumbling frequency is regulated by concentration of Ca²⁺ ion at the switch that controls tumbling and swimming. Attractants cause decreased levels of free cytoplasmic Ca²⁺ ion due to binding of Ca²⁺ ion by specific proteins. This Ca²⁺ ion is released when these proteins become methylated. An alternative model. involving a cytoplasmic metabolite “compound X”, is discussed.     

Receptor conformational changes enhance methylesterase activity during chemotaxis by Bacillus subtilis

Addition and removal of the attractant asparagine causes methanol formation as a consequence of methylation and demethylation of conserved glutamate residues in the Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis receptor McpB C-terminal domain. We found that methanol was released on both addition and removal of asparagine even when the response regulator domain of CheB was removed (to produce CheB(141-357)). Thus, in undergoing the transition from unbound receptor to ligand-bound adapted receptor, the receptor must pass through a state of heightened susceptibility to demethylation by CheB that is independent of phosphorylation. The same result occurred when the aspartate phosphorylation site of CheB, Asp54, had been mutated to an asparagine residue, provided the enzyme was sufficiently induced. However, no methanol release was observed for an active site point mutant, cheB(S173C), in response to addition or removal of asparagine even when induced. Finally, methanol release was observed only for attractant addition in a mutant background lacking the coupling proteins, CheW and CheV, provided CheB(141-357) was present. Thus, on attractant addition, methanol must arise from a transient conformation of the receptor C-terminal domain that is an intrinsic property of the receptor; on attractant removal, however, methanol must arise from a different transient conformation, one dependent on the presence of coupling proteins.     

Large increases in attractant concentration disrupt the polar localization of bacterial chemoreceptors

In bacterial chemotaxis, the chemoreceptors [methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs)] transduce chemotactic signals through the two-component histidine kinase CheA. At low but not high attractant concentrations, chemotactic signals must be amplified. The MCPs are organized into a polar lattice, and this organization has been proposed to be critical for signal amplification. Although evidence in support of this model has emerged, an understanding of how signals are amplified and modulated is lacking. We probed the role of MCP localization under conditions wherein signal amplification must be inhibited. We tested whether a large increase in attractant concentration (a change that should alter receptor occupancy from c. 0% to > 95%) would elicit changes in the chemoreceptor localization. We treated Escherichia coli or Bacillus subtilis with a high level of attractant, exposed cells to the cross-linking agent paraformaldehyde and visualized chemoreceptor location with an anti-MCP antibody. A marked increase in the percentage of cells displaying a diffuse staining pattern was obtained. In contrast, no increase in diffuse MCP staining is observed when cells are treated with a repellent or a low concentration of attractant. For B. subtilis mutants that do not undergo chemotaxis, the addition of a high concentration of attractant has no effect on MCP localization. Our data suggest that interactions between chemoreceptors are decreased when signal amplification is unnecessary.     

Recognition sites for chemotactic repellents of Bacillus subtilis.

Repellents of Bacillus subtilis include many membrane-active compounds, such as uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation, local anesthetics, chlorpromazine (a central nervous system depressant), and tetraphenylboron (a lipophilic anion). Normally, bacteria swim smoothly, and occasionally tumble, but addition of repellent causes all bacteria to tumble, then later resume original frequency of swimming and tumbling (adaptation). Bacteria adapted to repellent can then be tested to determine the minimum concentration (threshold) of the same or different repellents that causes tumbling. The results indicate that repellents act at (saturable) recognition sites, which differ for chemically different species. An implication is that uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation affect cell properties by interaction at specific locations.     

N-terminal half of CheB is involved in methylesterase response to negative chemotactic stimuli in Escherichia coli.

The chemotactic receptor-transducer proteins of Escherichia coli are responsible for directing the swimming behavior of cells by signaling for either straight swimming or tumbling in response to chemostimuli. The signaling states of these proteins are affected not only by the concentrations of various stimuli but also by the extent to which they have been methylated at specific glutamyl residues. The activities of a chemotaxis-specific methyltransferase (CheR) and a chemotaxis-specific methylesterase (CheB) are regulated in response to chemotactic stimuli to enable sensory adaptation to unchanging levels of stimuli by appropriately shifting the signaling states of the transducer proteins. For CheB this regulation involves a feedback loop that requires some of the components making up the chemotactic signal transduction machinery of the cell. This feedback loop causes the methylesterase activity of CheB to decrease transiently in response to attractant stimuli and to increase transiently in response to negative stimuli (repellent addition or attractant removal). In this report we demonstrate that the methylesterase response to negative stimuli involves the N-terminal half of the CheB protein, whereas the response to positive stimuli does not require this segment of the protein. Both aspects of the methylesterase response to positive stimuli does not require this segment of the protein. Both aspects of the methylesterase response require CheA. In addition, we demonstrate that mutant forms of CheB lacking methylesterase activity can adversely affect the swimming behavior and chemotactic ability of cells and can markedly diminish modulation of the wild-type methylesterase activity in response to negative stimuli. The significance of these results is discussed in relation to the recent demonstration of phosphoryl transfer from CheA to CheB (J. F. Hess, K. Oosawa, N. Kaplan, and M. I. Simon, Cell 53:79-87, 1988) and the discovery of sequence homology between the N-terminal half of CheB and CheY (A. Stock, D. E. Koshland, Jr., and J. Stock, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:7989-7993, 1985).     

Different roles of CheY1 and CheY2 in the chemotaxis of Rhizobium meliloti

Cells of Rhizobium meliloti swim by the unidirectional, clockwise rotation of their right-handed helical flagella and respond to tactic stimuli by modulating the flagellar rotary speed. We have shown that wild-type cells respond to the addition of proline, a strong chemoattractant, by a sustained increase in free-swimming speed (chemokinesis). We have examined the role of two response regulators, CheY1 and CheY2, and of CheA autokinase in the chemotaxis and chemokinesis of R. meliloti by comparing wild-type and mutant strains that carry deletions in the corresponding genes. Swarm tests, capillary assays, and computerized motion analysis revealed that (i) CheY2 alone mediates 60 to 70% of wild-type taxis, whereas CheY1 alone mediates no taxis, but is needed for the full tactic response; (ii) CheY2 is the main response regulator directing chemokinesis and smooth swimming in response to attractant, whereas CheY1 contributes little to chemokinesis, but interferes with smooth swimming; (iii) in a CheY2-overproducing strain, flagellar rotary speed increases upon addition and decreases upon removal of attractant; (iv) both CheY2 and CheY1 require phosphorylation by CheA for activity. We conclude that addition of attractant causes inhibition of CheA kinase and removal causes activation, and that consequent production of CheY1-P and CheY2-P acts to slow the flagellar motor. The action of the chief regulator, CheY2-P, on flagellar rotation is modulated by CheY1, probably by competition for phosphate from CheA.     

Excitatory signaling in bacterial probed by caged chemoeffectors.

Chemotactic excitation responses to caged ligand photorelease of rapidly swimming bacteria that reverse (Vibrio alginolyticus) or tumble (Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium) have been measured by computer. Mutants were used to assess the effects of abnormal motility behavior upon signal processing times and test feasibility of kinetic analyses of the signaling pathway in intact bacteria. N-1-(2-Nitrophenyl)ethoxycarbonyl-L-serine and 2-hydroxyphenyl 1-(2-nitrophenyl) ethyl phosphate were synthesized. These compounds are a 'caged' serine and a 'caged' proton and on flash photolysis release serine and protons and attractant and repellent ligands, respectively, for Tsr, the serine receptor. The product quantum yield for serine was 0.65 (+/- 0.05) and the rate of serine release was proportional to [H+] near-neutrality with a rate constant of 17 s-1 at pH 7.0 and 21 degrees C. The product quantum yield for protons was calculated to be 0.095 on 308-nm irradiation but 0.29 (+/- 0.02) on 300-350-nm irradiation, with proton release occurring at > 10(5) s-1. The pH jumps produced were estimated using pH indicators, the pH-dependent decay of the chromophoric aci-nitro intermediate and bioassays. Receptor deletion mutants did not respond to photorelease of the caged ligands. Population responses occurred without measurable latency. Response times increased with decreased stimulus strength. Physiological or genetic perturbation of motor rotation bias leading to increased tumbling reduced response sensitivity but did not affect response times. Exceptions were found. A CheR-CheB mutant strain had normal motility, but reduced response. A CheZ mutant had tumbly motility, reduced sensitivity, and increased response time to attractant, but a normal repellent response. These observations are consistent with current ideas that motor interactions with a single parameter, namely phosphorylated CheY protein, dictate motor response to both attractant and repellent stimuli. Inverse motility motor mutants with extreme rotation bias exhibited the greatest reduction in response sensitivity but, nevertheless, had normal attractant response times. This implies that control of CheY phosphate concentration rather than motor reactions limits responses to attractants.     

Methyl group turnover on methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins during chemotaxis by Bacillus subtilis

The addition of attractant to Bacillus subtilis briefly exposed to radioactive methionine causes an increase of labeling of the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. The addition of attractant to cells radiolabeled for longer times shows no change in the extent of methylation. Therefore, the increase in labeling for the briefly labeled cells is due to an increased turnover of methyl groups caused by attractant. All amino acids gave enhanced turnover. This turnover lasted for a prolonged time, probably spanning the period of smooth swimming caused by the attractant addition. Repellent did not affect the turnover when added alone or simultaneously with attractant. Thus, for amino acid attractants, the turnover is probably the excitatory signal, which is seen to extend long into or throughout the adaptation period, not just at the start of it.     

Repellents for Escherichia coli operate neither by changing membrane fluidity nor by being sensed by periplasmic receptors during chemotaxis

A long-standing question in bacterial chemotaxis is whether repellents are sensed by receptors or whether they change a general membrane property such as the membrane fluidity and this change, in turn, is sensed by the chemotaxis system. This study addressed this question. The effects of common repellents on the membrane fluidity of Escherichia coli were measured by the fluorescence polarization of the probe 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene in liposomes made of lipids extracted from the bacteria and in membrane vesicles. Glycerol, indole, and L-leucine had no significant effect on the membrane fluidity. NiSO4 decreased the membrane fluidity but only at concentrations much higher than those which elicit a repellent response in intact bacteria. This indicated that these repellents are not sensed by modulating the membrane fluidity. Aliphatic alcohols, on the other hand, fluidized the membrane, but the concentrations that elicited a repellent response were not equally effective in fluidizing the membrane. The response of intact bacteria to alcohols was monitored in various chemotaxis mutants and found to be missing in mutants lacking all the four methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) or the cytoplasmic che gene products. The presence of any single MCP was sufficient for the expression of a repellent response. It is concluded (i) that the repellent response to aliphatic alcohols can be mediated by any MCP and (ii) that although an increase in membrane fluidity may take part in a repellent response, it is not the only mechanism by which aliphatic alcohols, or at least some of them, are effective as repellents. To determine whether any of the E. coli repellents are sensed by periplasmic receptors, the effects of repellents from various classes on periplasm-void cells were examined. The responses to all the repellents tested (sodium benzoate, indole, L-leucine, and NiSO4) were retained in these cells. In a control experiment, the response of the attractant maltose, whose receptor is periplasmic, was lost. This indicates that these repellents are not sensed by periplasmic receptors. In view of this finding and the involvement of the MCPs in repellent sensing, it is proposed that the MCPs themselves are low-affinity receptors for the repellents.     

BasT, a membrane-bound transducer protein for amino acid detection in Halobacterium salinarum

Halophilic archaea, such as eubacteria, use methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) to sense their environment. We show here that BasT is a halobacterial transducer protein (Htp) responsible for chemotaxis towards five attractant amino acids. The C-terminus of the protein exhibits the highly conserved regions that are diagnostic for MCPs: the signalling domain for communication with the histidine kinase and the methylation sites that interact with the methylation/demethylation enzymes for adaptation. Hydropathy analysis predicts an enterobacterial-type transducer protein topology for BasT, with an extracellular putative ligand-binding domain flanked by two transmembrane helices and a cytoplasmic domain. BasT-inactivated mutant cells are missing a membrane protein radiolabelled with L-[methyl-3H]-methionine in wild-type cells, confirming that BasT is methylatable and membrane bound. Behavioural analysis of the basT mutant cells by capillary and chemical-in-plug assays demonstrates complete loss of chemotactic responses towards five (leucine, isoleucine, valine, methionine and cysteine) of the six attractant amino acids for Halobacterium salinarum, whereas they still respond to arginine. The volatile methyl group production assays also corroborate these findings and confirm that BasT signalling induces methyl group turnover. Our data identify BasT as the chemotaxis transducer protein for the branched chain amino acids leucine, isoleucine and valine as well as for methionine and cysteine. Thus, BasT and the arginine sensor Car cover the entire spectrum of chemotactic responses towards attractant amino acids in H. salinarum.     

CheC and CheD interact to regulate methylation of Bacillus subtilis methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins

In this study, we have demonstrated that two unique proteins in Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis, CheC and CheD, interact. We have shown this interaction both by using the yeast two-hybrid system and by precipitation of in vitro translated products using glutathione-S-transferase fusions and glutathione agarose beads. We have also shown that CheC inhibits B. subtilis CheR-mediated methylation of B. subtilis methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) but not of Escherichia coli MCPs. It was previously reported that cheC mutants tend to swim smoothly and do not adapt to addition of attractant; cheD mutants have very poorly methylated MCPs and are very tumbiy, similar to cheA mutants. We hypothesize that CheC exerts its effect on MCP methylation in B. subtilis by controlling the binding of CheD to the MCPs. In absence of CheD, the MCPs are poor substrates for CheR and appear to tie up, rather than activate, CheA. The regulation of CheD by CheC may be part of a unique adaptation system for chemotaxis in B. subtilis, whereby high levels of CheY-P brought about by attractant addition would allow CheC to interact with CheD and consequently leave the MCPs, reducing CheA activity and hence the levels of CheY-P.     

Chemosensory and thermosensory excitation in adaptation-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli

Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein-methyltransferase-deficient mutants, cheR mutants, of Escherichia coli showed a tumble response to repellents only at low temperatures, and the resultant tumbling lasted unless the condition was changed. The swimming pattern of the repellent-treated cells was different at different temperatures, indicating that the absolute temperature is a determinant of the tumbling frequency of those cells. The tumbling of those cells was also suppressed by the addition of attractants. Under a suitable repellent concentration, the tumbling frequency of the cells was found to be simply determined by the ligand occupancy of chemoreceptors for many attractants. In a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein-methylesterase-deficient mutant, a cheB deletion mutant, the tumbling frequency was also determined by receptor occupancy of some attractants. These results indicate that in the adaptation-deficient mutants, sensory signals are produced in proportion to the amount of ligand-bound or of thermally altered receptors and transmitted to the flagellar motors without any modification. Thus, it is concluded that the adaptation system, namely, the methylation-demethylation system of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, is not concerned with the step of chemosensory or thermosensory excitation. A simple model is proposed to explain how the swimming pattern of the adaptation-deficient mutants is determined.