The origin of the eukaryotic cell. IV. The general hypothesis of the autogenous origin of eukaryotes

The general hypothesis of autogenous (non-symbiotic) origin of the eukaryotic cell summarises some hypotheses explaining possible ways of the origin of main components and organelles of such a cell (the primary unicellular protist). Six hypothesises are suggested. Arising of the eukaryotic surface membrane of protist (cell) as a result of modification of its lipidoacidic composition, when most of synblocks and ensembles of eukaryotic enzymes sink into the cytoplasm (due to membrane vesiculation). Establishment of eukaryotic cytoplasm on the basis of successive formation of two locomotory-supporting apparates: the primary one (microtrabecular system), and the second one (cytoskeleton). Arising of the nucleus from a polyheteronomous nucleoid of proeukaryotes. A combinatorical hypothesis of mitosis formation. Polyheteronucleoid hypothesis of the origin of the mitochondria and chloroplasts. Arising of the flagellum from the contractile tentacle-like organelle, whose axoneme is made of single microtubules. A close interrelation and interaction in the process of evolution is noted between surface membranes, the cytoplasm and the nucleus. In accord a principles of block-construction and heterochrony (see: Seravin, 1986r), the author explains the preservation of prokaryotic signs of organization in some components (and organelles) of eukaryotic cell (and protists).     

Endosymbiosis and the design of eukaryotic electron transport

The bioenergetic organelles of eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts, are derived from endosymbiotic bacteria. Their electron transport chains (ETCs) resemble those of free-living bacteria, but were tailored for energy transformation within the host cell. Parallel evolutionary processes in mitochondria and chloroplasts include reductive as well as expansive events: On one hand, bacterial complexes were lost in eukaryotes with a concomitant loss of metabolic flexibility. On the other hand, new subunits have been added to the remaining bacterial complexes, new complexes have been introduced, and elaborate folding patterns of the thylakoid and mitochondrial inner membranes have emerged. Some bacterial pathways were reinvented independently by eukaryotes, such as parallel routes for quinol oxidation or the use of various anaerobic electron acceptors. Multicellular organization and ontogenetic cycles in eukaryotes gave rise to further modifications of the bioenergetic organelles. Besides mitochondria and chloroplasts, eukaryotes have ETCs in other membranes, such as the plasma membrane (PM) redox system, or the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system. These systems have fewer complexes and simpler branching patterns than those in energy-transforming organelles, and they are often adapted to non-bioenergetic functions such as detoxification or cellular defense.     

The origin of the eukaryotic cell. II. A critical analysis of the symbiotic (exogenous) concept

The exogenous (symbiotic) conception of the eukaryotic cell origin is unable to explain satisfactory the structure of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Either of these organelles possess its genome that can be compared with the viral one rather than with the bacterial one, judging by the dimensions and quantity of coding genes. The mitochondria resemble a little prokaryotes in the number of their proteins, chemical composition of their inner membrane and peculiarities of the protein-synthesizing apparatus. The primitive structure of mt DNA, the lesser quantity and greater unspecifity of the mitochondrial tRNA prove, additionally, the non-bacterial origin of this organelles. The deflexion of the genetic code from the universal one in the mitochondrial nucleoids also testify in favour of this point of view. The results of micropaleontological and paleobiochemical investigations evidence towards initial ability of the primary eukaryotes (primary protists) to photosynthesis. In this case, they did not need to acquire plastids from outside by symbiotic way. The autogenous origin of the flagellum of the primary protists was reported earlier (Seravin, 1985). The accumulated data permit us to consider that the cell organelles formed endogenously in the process of evolution of the cell.     

From extracellular to intracellular: the establishment of mitochondria and chloroplasts.

Paracoccus and Rhodopseudomonas are unusual among bacteria in having a majority of the biochemical features of mitochondria; blue-green algae have many of the features of chloroplasts. The theory of serial endosymbiosis proposes that a primitive eukaryote successively took up bacteria and blue-green algae to yield mitochondria and chloroplasts respectively. Possible characteristics of transitional forms are indicated both by the primitive amoeba, Pelomyxa, which lacks mitochondria but contains a permanent population of endosymbiotic bacteria, and by several anomalous eukaryotic algae, e.g. Cyanophora, which contain cyanelles instead of chloroplasts. Blue-green algae appear to be obvious precursors of red algal chloroplasts but the ancestry of other chloroplasts is less certain, though the epizoic symbiont, Prochloron, may resemble the ancestral green algal chloroplast. We speculate that the chloroplasts of the remaining algae may have been a eukaryotic origin. The evolution or organelles from endosymbiotic precursors would involve their integration with the host cell biochemically, structurally and numerically.     

Hydrogenosomes, mitochondria and early eukaryotic evolution

Available data suggest that unusual organelles called hydrogenosomes, that make ATP and hydrogen, and which are found in diverse anaerobic eukaryotes, were once mitochondria. The evolutionary origins of the enzymes used to make hydrogen, pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFO) and hydrogenase, are unresolved, but it seems likely that both were present at an early stage of eukaryotic evolution. Once thought to be restricted to a few unusual anaerobes, these proteins are found in diverse eukaryotic cells, including our own, where they are targeted to different cell compartments. Organelles related to mitochondria and hydrogenosomes have now been found in species of anaerobic and parasitic protozoa that were previously thought to have separated from other eukaryotes before the mitochondrial endosymbiosis. Thus it is possible that all eukaryotes may eventually be shown to contain an organelle of mitochondrial ancestry, bearing testimony to the important role that the mitochondrial endosymbiosis has played in eukaryotic evolution. It remains to be seen if members of this family of organelles share a common function essential to the eukaryotic cell, that provides the underlying selection pressure for organelle retention under different living conditions.     

Evolution of the chaperonin families (HSP60, HSP 10 and TCP-1) of proteins and the origin of eukaryotic cells

The members of the 10 kDa and 60 kDa heat-shock chaperonin proteins (Hsp10 and Hsp60 or Cpn10 and Cpn60), which form an operon in bacteria, are present in all eubacteria and eukaryotic ceil organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts. In archaebacteria and eukaryotic cell cytosol, no close homologues of Hsp10 or Hsp60 have been identified. However, these species (or ceil compartments) contain the Tcp-1 family of proteins (distant homologues of Hsp60). Phylogenetic analysis based on global alignments of Hsp60 and Hsp10 sequences presented here provide some evidence regarding the evolution of mitochondria from a member of the α-subdivision of Gram-negative bacteria and chloroplasts from cyanobacterial species, respectively. This inference is strengthened by the presence of sequence signatures that are uniquely shared between Hsp60 homologues from α-purple bacteria and mitochondria on one hand, and the chloroplasts and cyanobacterial hsp60s on the other. Within the α-purple subdivision, species such as Rickettsia and Ehrlichia, which live intracellularly within eukaryotic cells, are indicated to be the closest relatives of mitochondrial Homologues, In the Hsp60 evolutionary tree, rooted using the Tcp-1 homologue, the order of branching of the major groups was as follows: Gram-positive bacteria — cyanobacteria and chloroplasts — chlamydiae and spirochaetes —β and γ-Gram-negative purple bacteria —α-purple bacteria — mitochondria. A similar branching order was observed independently in the Hsp10 tree. Multiple Hsp60 homologues, when present in a group of species, were found to be clustered together in the trees, indicating that they evolved by independent gene-duplication events. This review also considers in detail the evolutionary relationship between Hsp50 and Tcp-1 families of proteins based on two different models (viz. archaebacterial and chimeric) for the origin of eukaryotic cell nucleus. Some predictions of the chimeric model are also discussed.     

Evolution of organellar proton-ATPases.

Proton ATPases function in biological energy conversion in every known living cell. Their ubiquity and antiquity make them a prime source for evolutionary studies. There are two related families of H(+)-ATPases; while the family of F-ATPases function in eubacteria chloroplasts and mitochondria, the family of V-ATPases are present in archaebacteria and the vacuolar system of eukaryotic cells. Sequence analysis of several subunits of V- and F-ATPases revealed several of the important steps in their evolution. Moreover, these studies shed light on the evolution of the various organelles of eukaryotes and suggested some events in the evolution of the three kingdoms of eubacteria, archaebacteria and eukaryotes.     

Symbionticism revisited: a discussion of the evolutionary impact of intracellular symbioses.

Wallin (1927) first published the notion that the fusion of bacteria with host cells was the principal source of genetic novelty for speciation. He suggested that mitochondria are transitional elements in this process. While the significance that he attributed to symbiosis now seem excessive, he was one of the first authors to be aware of the evolutionary potential of symbiotic events and his view of mitochondria may not seem strange to many cell biologist today. The most significant evolutionary development which has been attributed to intracellular symbiosis is the origin of eukaryotic cellular organization. The current status of the 'serial endosymbiosis hypothesis' is briefly review. The case for the symbiotic origin of the chloroplast, based principally on 16 S RNA oligonucleotide cataloguing, is very strong. Mitochondrial origins are more obscure but also appear to be symbiotic due to recent 18 S cataloguing from wheat embryos. The probablility of the multiple origin of some eukaryotic organelles is also examined, the processes in question being the acquisition of distinct stocks of chloroplasts from disparate photosynthetic prokaryotes and the secondary donation of organelles from degenerate eukaryotic endosymbionts to their hosts, with specific reference to the dinoflagellates Peridinium balticum, Kryptoperidinium foliaceum and the ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. It is concluded that the evolutionary potential of intracellular symbiosis ('cytobiosis': a term introduced in this paper) is great, with the best established influence being on the origin of eukaryotic chloroplasts. Together with the potential effects of viral vectors, symbiosis serves as a supplementary speciation mechanism capable of producing directed evolutionary changes. It is likely that these processes will explain some of the apparent anomalies in evolutionary rates and direction which are not readily explicable by the conventional synthetic theory of evolution.     

Small GTPases and the evolution of the eukaryotic cell

The origin of eukaryotes is one of the major challenges of evolutionary cell biology. Other than the endosymbiotic origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts, the steps leading to eukaryotic endomembranes and endoskeleton are poorly understood. Ras-family small GTPases are key regulators of cytoskeleton dynamics, vesicular trafficking and nuclear function. They are specific for eukaryotes and their expansion probably traces the evolution of core eukaryote features. The phylogeny of small GTPases suggests that the first endomembranes to evolve during eukaryote evolution had secretory, and not phagocytic, function. Based on the reconstruction of putative roles for ancestral small GTPases, a hypothetical scenario on the origins of the first endomembranes, the nucleus, and phagocytosis is presented.     

The origin of the eukaryotic cell. I. Historical sources and current state of the concept of symbiotic and autogenic origins of the cell

The exogenous (symbiotic) conception of the eukaryotic origin is now widely spread. It is based on the recognition of the principle of combination (addition or enclosing) of diverse prokaryotic organisms; so the complicated unicellular eukaryotic organism (eukaryotic cell) was resulted. the principle of combination takes its historical scientific sources from the ideas of Buffon. With reference to the cell this principle was claimed for the first time. In our time the exogenous conception is characterized as a "symbiotic boom", because it is widely used in attempts to explain the origin of all the main organelles of the cell (right up to the micro-bodies). The autogenetic (endogenous) conception is based on the principle of straight phyliation, on the recognition of a successive evolutionary transformation of prokaryotic forms into eukaryotic ones. In this way all the cell organelles may have an endogenous origin. This principle springing from Lamarck has got a contemporary meaning in the doctrine of Darwin. In the next papers the author will present his own analysis and generation of the present day relevant facts to find out which of these two conceptions based on quite different scientific methodological principles may be correct.     

3-D ultrastructure of O. tauri: electron cryotomography of an entire eukaryotic cell

The hallmark of eukaryotic cells is their segregation of key biological functions into discrete, membrane-bound organelles. Creating accurate models of their ultrastructural complexity has been difficult in part because of the limited resolution of light microscopy and the artifact-prone nature of conventional electron microscopy. Here we explored the potential of the emerging technology electron cryotomography to produce three-dimensional images of an entire eukaryotic cell in a near-native state. Ostreococcus tauri was chosen as the specimen because as a unicellular picoplankton with just one copy of each organelle, it is the smallest known eukaryote and was therefore likely to yield the highest resolution images. Whole cells were imaged at various stages of the cell cycle, yielding 3-D reconstructions of complete chloroplasts, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticula, Golgi bodies, peroxisomes, microtubules, and putative ribosome distributions in-situ. Surprisingly, the nucleus was seen to open long before mitosis, and while one microtubule (or two in some predivisional cells) was consistently present, no mitotic spindle was ever observed, prompting speculation that a single microtubule might be sufficient to segregate multiple chromosomes.     

Nuclear movement in filamentous fungi

One of the most striking features of eukaryotic cells is the organization of specific functions into organelles such as nuclei, mitochondria, chloroplasts, the endoplasmic reticulum, vacuoles, peroxisomes or the Golgi apparatus. These membrane-surrounded compartments are not synthesized de novo but are bequeathed to daughter cells during cell division. The successful transmittance of organelles to daughter cells requires the growth, division and separation of these compartments and involves a complex machinery consisting of cytoskeletal components, mechanochemical motor proteins and regulatory factors. Organelles such as nuclei, which are present in most cells in a single copy, must be precisely positioned prior to cytokinesis. In many eukaryotic cells the cleavage plane for cell division is defined by the location of the nucleus prior to mitosis. Nuclear positioning is thus absolutely crucial in the unequal cell divisions that occur during development and embryogenesis. Yeast and filamentous fungi are excellent organisms for the molecular analysis of nuclear migration because of their amenability to a broad variety of powerful analytical methods unavailable in higher eukaryotes. Filamentous fungi are especially attractive models because the longitudinally elongated cells grow by apical tip extension and the organelles are often required to migrate long distances. This review describes nuclear migration in filamentous fungi, the approaches used for and the results of its molecular analysis and the projection of the results to other organisms.     

Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetases as an example for comparative and evolutionary aspects of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are indispensable components of protein synthesis in all three lines of evolutionary descent, eubacteria, archaebacteria and eukaryotes. Furthermore they are also present in the translational apparatus of the semi-autonomous organelles, mitochondria and chloroplasts, of the eukaryotic cell. Therefore aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are appropriate objects for comparative molecular biology in order to obtain a comprehensive picture of the evolution of the translational process. The analysis of the phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase in a large variety of organisms and organelles in this respect is the most advanced. In addition to comparison of quaternary structure, analysis includes functional aspects of accuracy mechanisms (proofreading) and comparison of structural features by means of substrate analogs. Evolutionary relationships are furthermore elucidated using the immunological approach and heterologous aminoacylation.     

Coordination of gene expression between organellar and nuclear genomes

Following the acquisition of chloroplasts and mitochondria by eukaryotic cells during endosymbiotic evolution, most of the genes in these organelles were either lost or transferred to the nucleus. Encoding organelle-destined proteins in the nucleus allows for host control of the organelle. In return, organelles send signals to the nucleus to coordinate nuclear and organellar activities. In photosynthetic eukaryotes, additional interactions exist between mitochondria and chloroplasts. Here we review recent advances in elucidating the intracellular signalling pathways that coordinate gene expression between organelles and the nucleus, with a focus on photosynthetic plants.     

The origin of eukaryotes: the difference between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.

Eukaryotes have long been thought to have arisen by evolving a nucleus, endomembrane, and cytoskeleton. In contrast, it was recently proposed that the first complex cells, which were actually proto-eukaryotes, arose simultaneously with the acquisition of mitochondria. This so-called symbiotic association hypothesis states that eukaryotes emerged when some ancient anaerobic archaebacteria (hosts) engulfed respiring alpha-proteobacteria (symbionts), which evolved into the first energy-producing organelles. Therefore, the intracellular compartmentalization of the energy-converting metabolism that was bound originally to the plasma membrane appears to be the key innovation towards eukaryotic genome and cellular organization. The novel energy metabolism made it possible for the nucleotide synthetic apparatus of cells to be no longer limited by subsaturation with substrates and catalytic components. As a consequence, a considerable increase has occurred in the size and complexity of eukaryotic genomes, providing the genetic basis for most of the further evolutionary changes in cellular complexity. On the other hand, the active uptake of exogenous DNA, which is general in bacteria, was no longer essential in the genome organization of eukaryotes. The mitochondrion-driven scenario for the first eukaryotes explains the chimera-like composition of eukaryotic genomes as well as the metabolic and cellular organization of eukaryotes.     

Calcium signaling in plant cell organelles delimited by a double membrane

Increases in the concentration of free calcium in the cytosol are one of the general events that relay an external stimulus to the internal cellular machinery and allow eukaryotic organisms, including plants, to mount a specific biological response. Different lines of evidence have shown that other intracellular organelles contribute to the regulation of free calcium homeostasis in the cytosol. The vacuoles, the endoplasmic reticulum and the cell wall constitute storage compartments for mobilizable calcium. In contrast, the role of organelles surrounded by a double membrane (e.g. mitochondria, chloroplasts and nuclei) is more complex. Here, we review experimental data showing that these organelles harbor calcium-dependent biological processes. Mitochondria, chloroplasts as well as nuclei are equipped to generate calcium signal on their own. Changes in free calcium in a given organelle may also favor the relocalization of proteins and regulatory components and therefore have a profound influence on the integrated functioning of the cell. Studying, in time and space, the dynamics of different components of calcium signaling pathway will certainly give clues to understand the extraordinary flexibility of plants to respond to stimuli and mount adaptive responses. The availability of technical and biological resources should allow breaking new grounds by unveiling the contribution of signaling networks in integrative plant biology.     

Adaptations by macroalgae to low carbon availability. II. Ultrastructural specializations, related to the function of a photosynthetic buffer system in the Fucaceae

Abstract Among the brown algae, species of the Fucaceae (Pelvetia, Fucus and Ascophyllum) were found to have a ‘photosynthetic buffering’ system, allowing the algae to carry out oxygen production without a concomitant uptake of inorganic carbon. This system was not found in other brown algae examined (e.g. Halidrys, Laminaria and Desmarestia) nor in 16 examined species of red and green algae. Pelvetia, Fucus and Ascophyllum belong to the littoral algae which are periodically emersed. In the Fucaceae, the meristodermal cells were found to have a special organization of organelles. Towards the outer cell wall there was a prominent layer of mitochondria while the chloroplasts were concentrated towards the inner and side walls. Between the mitochondria and the chloroplasts there was a large number of physodes. This arrangement of organelles was not found in the other brown algae examined nor in red or green algae. The significance of this organization of the mitochondria is discussed in connection with the function of the ‘photosynthetic buffering’ system.     

On a possible relationship between bacterial endospore formation and the origin of eukaryotic cells

The acquisition of intracellular organelles, including mitochondria and plastids and a membrane-bounded nucleus, have been postulated to be key events in the development of the eukaryotic from the prokaryotic ancestral cell. The two major hypotheses to account for such acquisitions are: (1) primitive cells originally obtained organelles by engulfing free-living prokaryotes which then entered into symbiotic association (“endosymbiosis”) with them; (2) organelles arose through the engulfment by the primitive cell of part of its own cytoplasm. To some extent, the former hypothesis has received most support, because endosymbiosis is known to occur in extant organisms, whilst the latter hypothesis has received less support, because cytoplasmic engulfment by prokaryotes is not now thought to occur. However, during the process of endospore formation by extant bacteria, the protoplast within the single cell is observed to divide in a unique manner such that the cell in effect engulfs a portion of its own cytoplasm. The process is strikingly similar to the engulfment suggested by the second hypothesis to have initiated the evolution of eukaryotes. The engulfed cytoplasm is bounded by a double membrane within the “mother cell” and contains enzymes, ribosomes and a complete genome. In many respects this parallels the supposed primitive eukaryotic state and, it is argued, confers potential advantages on the cell, particularly through the control that the “mother cell” can exert on the enclosed compartment. It is hypothesized that bacterial endospore formation is therefore one product of evolution from an early engulfment event that led also to the development of complex eukaryotic cells.     

Direct Targeting of Proteins from the Cytosol to Organelles: The ER versus Endosymbiotic Organelles

In eukaryotic cells consisting of many different types of organelles, targeting of organellar proteins is one of the most fundamental cellular processes. Proteins belonging to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), chloroplasts and mitochondria are targeted individually from the cytosol to their cognate organelles. As the targeting to these organelles occurs in the cytosol during or after translation, the most crucial aspect is how specific targeting to these three organelles can be achieved without interfering with other targeting pathways. For these organelles, multiple mechanisms are used for targeting proteins, but the exact mechanism used depends on the type of protein and organelle, the location of targeting signals in the protein and the location of the protein in the organelle. In this review, we discuss the various mechanisms involved in protein targeting to the ER, chloroplasts and mitochondria, and how the targeting specificity is determined for these organelles in plant cells .     

The number of symbiotic origins of organelles.

Mitochondria and chloroplasts both originated from bacterial endosymbionts. The available evidence strongly supports a single origin for mitochondria and only somewhat less strongly a single, slightly later, origin for chloroplasts. The arguments and evidence that have sometimes been presented in favor of the alternative theories of the multiple or polyphyletic origins of these two organelles are evaluated and the kinds of data that are needed to test more rigorously the monophyletic theory are discussed. Although chloroplasts probably originated only once, eukaryotic algae are polyphyletic because chloroplasts have been secondarily transferred to new lineages by the permanent incorporation of a photosynthetic eukaryotic algal cell into a phagotrophic protozoan host. How often this has happened is much less clear. It is particularly unclear whether or not the chloroplasts of typical dinoflagellates and euglenoids originated in this way from a eukaryotic symbiont: their direct divergence from the ancestral chloroplast cannot be ruled out and indeed has several arguments in its favor. The evidence for and against the view that the chloroplast of the kingdom Chromista was acquired in a single endosymbiotic event is discussed. The possibility that even the chloroplast of Chlorarachnion might have been acquired during the same symbiosis that created the cryptomonad cell, if the symbiont was a primitive alga that had chlorophyll a, b and c as well as phycobilins, is also considered. An alga with such a combination of pigments might have been ancestral to all eukaryote algae.