Selection and testing of reference genes for accurate RT-qPCR in adult needles and seedlings of maritime pine

Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) techniques have revolutionized gene expression analyses. To obtain accurate results, raw RT-qPCR results need to be normalized by using endogenous reference genes whose expression is assumed invariable in all studied samples. However, there are no universal reference genes, and candidate genes need to be evaluated for each experimental condition. In this work, we tested a set of possible reference genes for use in different organs and tissues of Pinus pinaster (needles from adult trees and different organs and developmental stages of seedlings). The putative reference genes were selected using microarray analyses and from those commonly used in previous works. To achieve reproducible and reliable results, Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines were followed. To highlight the importance of these rules, 10 alternative primer pairs to be evaluated in pine samples were designed by following or not following the MIQE guidelines. Twenty-four candidate reference genes were tested in pine needles and 14 were also tested in pine seedlings. In both cases, valid reference genes were found, but differences in the stability and expression levels were also observed. Furthermore, a few of the best genes had unknown functions. The five most stable genes in the pine seedlings as well as four new candidate reference genes were evaluated in isolated tissues using laser capture microdissection. The results showed that the appropriate reference genes in different maritime pine organs were not invariable when sourced from the different tissues forming the organs.     

Evidence based selection of housekeeping genes

For accurate and reliable gene expression analysis, normalization of gene expression data against housekeeping genes (reference or internal control genes) is required. It is known that commonly used housekeeping genes (e.g. ACTB, GAPDH, HPRT1, and B2M) vary considerably under different experimental conditions and therefore their use for normalization is limited. We performed a meta-analysis of 13,629 human gene array samples in order to identify the most stable expressed genes. Here we show novel candidate housekeeping genes (e.g. RPS13, RPL27, RPS20 and OAZ1) with enhanced stability among a multitude of different cell types and varying experimental conditions. None of the commonly used housekeeping genes were present in the top 50 of the most stable expressed genes. In addition, using 2,543 diverse mouse gene array samples we were able to confirm the enhanced stability of the candidate novel housekeeping genes in another mammalian species. Therefore, the identified novel candidate housekeeping genes seem to be the most appropriate choice for normalizing gene expression data.     

A combined strategy of “in silico” transcriptome analysis and web search engine optimization allows an agile identification of reference genes suitable for normalization in gene expression studies

Traditionally housekeeping genes have been employed as endogenous reference (internal control) genes for normalization in gene expression studies. Since the utilization of single housekeepers cannot assure an unbiased result, new normalization methods involving multiple housekeeping genes and normalizing using their mean expression have been recently proposed. Moreover, since a gold standard gene suitable for every experimental condition does not exist, it is also necessary to validate the expression stability of every putative control gene on the specific requirements of the planned experiment. As a consequence, finding a good set of reference genes is for sure a non-trivial problem requiring quite a lot of lab-based experimental testing. In this work we identified novel candidate barley reference genes suitable for normalization in gene expression studies. An advanced web search approach aimed to collect, from publicly available web resources, the most interesting information regarding the expression profiling of candidate housekeepers on a specific experimental basis has been set up and applied, as an example, on stress conditions. A complementary lab-based analysis has been carried out to verify the expression profile of the selected genes in different tissues and during heat shock response. This combined dry/wet approach can be applied to any species and physiological condition of interest and can be considered very helpful to identify putative reference genes to be shortlisted every time a new experimental design has to be set up.     

Validation of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis of CYP4T expression in crucian carp

Reference genes are commonly used for normalization of target gene expression during RT-qPCR analysis. However, no housekeeping genes or reference genes have been identified to be stable across different tissue types or under different experimental conditions. To identify the most suitable reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis of target gene expression in the hepatopancreas of crucian carp (Carassius auratus) under various conditions (sex, age, water temperature, and drug treatments), seven reference genes, including beta actin (ACTB), beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), embryonic elongation factor-1 alpha (EEF1A), glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), alpha tubulin (TUBA), ribosomal protein l8 (RPL8) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), were evaluated in this study. The stability and ranking of gene expression were analyzed using three different statistical programs: GeNorm, Normfinder and Bestkeeper. The expression errors associated with selection of the genes were assessed by the relative quantity of CYP4T. The results indicated that all the seven genes exhibited variability under the experimental conditions of this research, and the combination of ACTB/TUBA/EEF1A or of ACTB/EEF1A was the best candidate that raised the accuracy of quantitative analysis of gene expression. The findings highlighted the importance of validation of housekeeping genes for research on gene expression under different conditions of experiment and species.     

Identification of suitable reference genes for gene expression studies of human serous ovarian cancer by real-time polymerase chain reaction

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) has proven to be a valuable molecular technique in gene expression quantification. Target gene expression levels are usually normalized to a stably expressed reference gene simultaneously determined in the same sample. It is critical to select optimal reference genes to interpret data generated by RT-qPCR. However, no suitable reference genes have been identified in human ovarian cancer to date. In this study, 10 housekeeping genes, ACTB, ALAS1, GAPDH, GUSB, HPRT1, PBGD, PPIA, PUM1, RPL29, and TBP as well as 18S rRNA that were already used in various studies were analyzed to determine their applicability. Totally 20 serous ovarian cancer specimens and 20 normal ovarian epithelial tissue specimens were examined. All candidate reference genes showed significant differences in expression between malignant and nonmalignant groups except GUSB, PPIA, and TBP. The expression stability and suitability of the 11 genes were validated employing geNorm and NormFinder. GUSB, PPIA, and TBP were demonstrated as the most stable reference genes and thus could be used as reference genes for normalization in gene profiling studies of serous ovarian cancer, while the combination of two genes (GUSB and PPIA) or the all three genes should be recommended as a much more reliable normalization strategy.     

Gene expression studies of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR: an overview in insects

Whenever gene expression is being examined, it is essential that a normalization process is carried out to eliminate non-biological variations. The use of reference genes, such as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, actin, and ribosomal protein genes, is the usual method of choice for normalizing gene expression. Although reference genes are used to normalize target gene expression, a major problem is that the stability of these genes differs among tissues, developmental stages, species, and responses to abiotic factors. Therefore, the use and validation of multiple reference genes are required. This review discusses the reasons that why RT-qPCR has become the preferred method for validating results of gene expression profiles, the use of specific and non-specific dyes and the importance of use of primers and probes for qPCR as well as to discuss several statistical algorithms developed to help the validation of potential reference genes. The conflicts arising in the use of classical reference genes in gene normalization and their replacement with novel references are also discussed by citing the high stability and low stability of classical and novel reference genes under various biotic and abiotic experimental conditions by employing various methods applied for the reference genes amplification.