Novel signalling events mediated by muscarinic receptor subtypes

The M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) activates Gi protein coupled pathways, such as stimulation of G-protein activated inwardly rectifying K channels (GIRKs). Here we report a novel heterologous desensitization of these GIRK currents, which appeared to be specifically induced by M2/M4 mAChR stimulation, but not via adenosine (Ado) and alpha2-adrenergic receptors (AR). This heterologous desensitization reflected an inhibition of the GIRK signalling pathway downstream of G-protein activation. It was mediated in a membrane-delimited fashion via a PTX insensitive GTP dependent pathway and could be competed with exogenous Gbetagamma. The activation of M3 mAChR/Gq coupled receptors potently inhibited GIRK currents similar as M2 mAChR. By monitoring simultaneously the response of A1 adenosine receptor (AdoR) activation on N-type Ca2+ channels and GIRK channels, the stimulation of M3 mAChR was found to cause an inhibition of the Ado response in both effector systems, suggesting that the inhibition occurred at the level of the G-protein common to both effectors. These results indicated that Gq proteins inhibit pathways that are commonly regulated by Gbetagamma proteins.     

Inhibition of a Gi-activated potassium channel (GIRK1/4) by the Gq-coupled m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

The G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K+ channel, GIRK1/GIRK4, can be activated by receptors coupled to the Galpha(i) subunit. An opposing role for Galpha(q) receptor signaling in GIRK regulation has only recently begun to be established. We have studied the effects of m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) stimulation, which is known to mobilize calcium and activate protein kinase C (PKC) by a Galpha(q)-dependent mechanism, on whole cell GIRK1/4 currents in Xenopus oocytes. We found that stimulation of the m1 mAChR suppresses both basal and dopamine 2 receptor-activated GIRK 1/4 currents. Overexpression of Gbetagamma subunits attenuates this effect, suggesting that increased binding of Gbetagamma to the GIRK channel can effectively compete with the G(q)-mediated inhibitory signal. This G(q) signal requires the use of second messenger molecules; pharmacology implicates a role for PKC and Ca2+ responses as m1 mAChR-mediated inhibition of GIRK channels is mimicked by PMA and Ca2+ ionophore. We have analyzed a series of mutant and chimeric channels suggesting that the GIRK4 subunit is capable of responding to G(q) signals and that the resulting current inhibition does not occur via phosphorylation of a canonical PKC site on the channel itself.     

Coordination of membrane excitability through a GIRK1 signaling complex in the atria

Control of heart rate is a complex process that integrates the function of multiple G protein-coupled receptors and ion channels. Among them, the G protein-regulated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK or KACh) channels of sinoatrial node and atria play a major role in beat-to-beat regulation of the heart rate. The atrial KACh channels are heterotetrameric proteins that consist of two pore-forming subunits, GIRK1 and GIRK4. Following m2-muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M2R) stimulation, KACh channel activation is conferred by the direct binding of G protein betagamma subunits (Gbetagamma) to the channel. Here we show that atrial KACh channels are assembled in a signaling complex with Gbetagamma, G protein-coupled receptor kinase, cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase, two protein phosphatases, PP1 and PP2A, receptor for activated C kinase 1, and actin. This complex would enable the KACh channels to rapidly integrate beta-adrenergic and M2R signaling in the membrane, and it provides insight into general principles governing spatial integration of different transduction pathways. Furthermore, the same complex might recruit protein kinase C (PKC) to the KACh channel following alpha-adrenergic receptor stimulation. Our electro-physiological recordings from single atrial KACh channels revealed a potent inhibition of Gbetagamma-induced channel activity by PKC, thus validating the physiological significance of the observed complex as interconnecting site where signaling molecules congregate to execute a coordinated control of membrane excitability.     

Galphai1 and Galphai3 differentially interact with, and regulate, the G protein-activated K+ channel

G protein-activated K(+) channels (GIRKs; Kir3) are activated by direct binding of Gbetagamma subunits released from heterotrimeric G proteins. In native tissues, only pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins of the G(i/o) family, preferably Galpha(i3) and Galpha(i2), are donors of Gbetagamma for GIRK. How this specificity is achieved is not known. Here, using a pull-down method, we confirmed the presence of Galpha(i3-GDP) binding site in the N terminus of GIRK1 and identified novel binding sites in the N terminus of GIRK2 and in the C termini of GIRK1 and GIRK2. The non-hydrolyzable GTP analog, guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate, reduced the binding of Galpha(i3) by a factor of 2-4. Galpha(i1-GDP) bound to GIRK1 and GIRK2 much weaker than Galpha(i3-GDP). Titrated expression of components of signaling pathway in Xenopus oocytes and their activation by m2 muscarinic receptors revealed that G(i3) activates GIRK more efficiently than G(i1), as indicated by larger and faster agonist-evoked currents. Activation of GIRK by purified Gbetagamma in excised membrane patches was strongly augmented by coexpression of Galpha(i3) and less by Galpha(i1). Differences in physical interactions of GIRK with GDP-bound Galpha subunits, or Galphabetagamma heterotrimers, may dictate different extents of Galphabetagamma anchoring, influence the efficiency of GIRK activation by Gbetagamma, and play a role in determining signaling specificity.     

Receptor-mediated inhibition of G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium channels involves G(alpha)q family subunits, phospholipase C, and a readily diffusible messenger

G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels can be activated or inhibited by distinct classes of receptor (G(alpha)i/o- and G(alpha)q-coupled), providing dynamic regulation of cellular excitability. Receptor-mediated activation involves direct effects of G(beta)gamma subunits on GIRK channels, but mechanisms involved in GIRK channel inhibition have not been fully elucidated. An HEK293 cell line that stably expresses GIRK1/4 channels was used to test G protein mechanisms that mediate GIRK channel inhibition. In cells transiently or stably cotransfected with 5-HT1A (G(alpha)i/o-coupled) and TRH-R1 (G(alpha)q-coupled) receptors, 5-HT (5-hydroxytryptamine; serotonin) enhanced GIRK channel currents, whereas thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) inhibited both basal and 5-HT-activated GIRK channel currents. Inhibition of GIRK channel currents by TRH primarily involved signaling by G(alpha)q family subunits, rather than G(beta)gamma dimers: GIRK channel current inhibition was diminished by Pasteurella multocida toxin, mimicked by constitutively active members of the G(alpha)q family, and reduced by minigene constructs that disrupt G(alpha)q signaling, but was completely preserved in cells expressing constructs that interfere with signaling by G(beta)gamma subunits. Inhibition of GIRK channel currents by TRH and constitutively active G(alpha)q was reduced by, an inhibitor of phospholipase C (PLC). Moreover, TRH- R1-mediated GIRK channel inhibition was diminished by minigene constructs that reduce membrane levels of the PLC substrate phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate, further implicating PLC. However, we found no evidence for involvement of protein kinase C, inositol trisphosphate, or intracellular calcium. Although these downstream signaling intermediaries did not contribute to receptor-mediated GIRK channel inhibition, bath application of TRH decreased GIRK channel activity in cell-attached patches. Together, these data indicate that receptor-mediated inhibition of GIRK channels involves PLC activation by G(alpha) subunits of the G(alpha)q family and suggest that inhibition may be communicated at a distance to GIRK channels via unbinding and diffusion of phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate away from the channel.     

Overexpression of beta 1 and beta 2 adrenergic receptors in rat atrial myocytes. Differential coupling to G protein-gated inward rectifier K(+) channels via G(s) and G(i)/o

G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) (GIRK) channels, expressed in atrial myocytes, various neurons, and endocrine cells, represent the paradigmatic target of beta gamma subunits released from activated heterotrimeric G proteins. These channels contribute to physiological slowing of cardiac frequency and synaptic inhibition. They are activated by beta gamma dimers released upon stimulation of receptors coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins (G(i/o)), whereas beta gamma released from G(s) do not converge on the channel subunits. This is in conflict with the finding that dimeric combinations of various beta and gamma subunits can activate GIRK channels with little specificity. In the present study, we have overexpressed the major subtypes of cardiac beta-adrenergic receptors (beta(1)-AR and beta(2)-AR) in atrial myocytes by transient transfection. Whereas in native cells beta-adrenergic stimulation with isoproterenol failed to induce measurable GIRK current, robust currents were recorded from myocytes overexpressing either beta(1)-AR or beta(2)-AR. Whereas the beta(2)-AR-induced current showed the same sensitivity to pertussis toxin as the current evoked by the endogenous G(i/o)-coupled muscarinic M(2) receptor, isoproterenol-activated currents were insensitive to pertussis toxin treatment in beta(1)-AR-overexpressing myocytes. In contrast to a recent publication (Leaney, J. L., Milligan, G., and Tinker, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 921-929), sizable GIRK currents could also be activated by isoproterenol when the signaling pathway was reconstituted by transient transfection in two different standard cell lines (Chinese hamster ovary and HEK293). These results demonstrate that specificity of receptor-G protein signaling can be disrupted by overexpression of receptors. Moreover, the alpha subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins does not confer specificity to G beta gamma-mediated signaling.     

The sensitivity of G protein-activated K+ channels toward halothane is essentially determined by the C terminus

G protein-activated K(+) channels (GIRKs or Kir3.x) are targets for the volatile anesthetic, halothane. When coexpressed with the m(2) acetylcholine (ACh) receptor in Xenopus oocytes, agonist-activated GIRK1(F137S)- and GIRK2-mediated currents are inhibited by halothane, whereas in the absence of ACh, high concentrations of halothane induce GIRK1(F137S)-mediated currents. To elucidate the molecular mechanism of halothane action on GIRK currents of different subunit compositions, we constructed deletion mutants of GIRK1(F137S) (GIRK1(Delta363*)) and GIRK2 (GIRK2(Delta356)) lacking the C-terminal ends, as well as chimeric GIRK channels. Mutated GIRK channels showed normal currents when activated by ACh but exhibited different pharmacological properties toward halothane. GIRK2(Delta356) showed no sensitivity against the inhibitory action of halothane but was activated by halothane in the absence of an agonist. GIRK1(Delta363*) was activated by halothane more efficiently. Currents mediated by chimeric channels were inhibited by anesthetic concentrations that were at least 30-fold lower than those necessary to decrease GIRK2 wild type currents. Glutathione S-transferase pulldown experiments did not show displacement of bound Gbetagamma by halothane, indicating that halothane does not interfere with Gbetagamma binding. Single channel experiments revealed an influence of halothane on the gating of the channels: The agonist-induced currents of GIRK1 and GIRK2, carried mainly by brief openings, were inhibited, whereas higher concentrations of the anesthetic promoted long openings of GIRK1 channels. Because the C terminus is crucial for these effects, an interaction of halothane with the channel seems to be involved in the mechanism of current modulation.     

Molecular mechanisms mediating inhibition of G protein-coupled inwardly-rectifying K+ channels

Neuronal G protein-coupled inwardly-rectifying potassium channels (GIRKs, Kir3.x) can be activated or inhibited by distinct classes of receptors (Galphai/o and Galphaq/11-coupled, respectively), providing dynamic regulation of neuronal excitability. In this mini-review, we highlight findings from our laboratory in which we used a mammalian heterologous expression system to address mechanisms of GIRK channel regulation by Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits. We found that, like beta1- and beta2-containing Gbetagamma dimers, GIRK channels are also activated by G protein betagamma dimers containing beta3 and beta4 subunits. By contrast, GIRK currents are inhibited by beta5-containing Gbetagamma dimers and/or by Galpha proteins of the Galphaq/11 family. The properties of Gbeta5-mediated inhibition suggest that beta5-containing Gbetagamma dimers act as competitive antagonists of other activating Gbetagamma pairs on GIRK channels. Inhibition of GIRK channels by Galpha subunits is specific to members of the Galphaq/11 family and appears to result, at least in part, from activation of phospholipase C (PLC) and the resultant decrease in membrane levels of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), an endogenous co-factor necessary for GIRK channel activity; this Galphaq/11 activated mechanism is largely responsible for receptor-mediated GIRK channel inhibition.     

Antisense oligonucleotides against receptor kinase GRK2 disrupt target selectivity of beta-adrenergic receptors in atrial myocytes.

K+ channels composed of GIRK subunits are predominantly expressed in the heart and various regions of the brain. They are activated by betagamma-subunits released from pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins coupled to different seven-helix receptors. In rat atrial myocytes, activation of K(ACh) channels is strictly limited to receptors coupled to pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins. Upon treatment of myocytes with antisense oligodesoxynucleotides against GRK2, a receptor kinase with Gbetagamma binding sites, in a fraction of cells, K(ACh) channels can be activated by beta-adrenergic receptors. Sensitivity to beta-agonist is insensitive to pertussis toxin treatment. These findings demonstrate a potential role of Gbetagamma binding proteins for target selectivity of G-protein-coupled receptors.     

M2 muscarinic receptors induce airway smooth muscle activation via a dual, Gbetagamma-mediated inhibition of large conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel activity

Airway smooth muscle is richly endowed with muscarinic receptors of the M(2) and M(3) subtype. Stimulation of these receptors inhibits large conductance calcium-activated K(+) (BK) channels, a negative feed back regulator, in a pertussis toxin-sensitive manner and thus facilitates contraction. The underlying mechanism, however, is unknown. We therefore studied the activity of bovine trachea BK channels in HEK293 cells expressing the M(2) or M(3) receptor (M(2)R or M(3)R). In M(2)R- but not M(3)R-expressing cells, maximal effective concentrations of carbamoylcholine (CCh) inhibited whole cell BK currents by 53%. This M(2)R-induced inhibition was abolished by pertussis toxin treatment or overexpression of the Gbetagamma scavenger transducin-alpha. In inside-out patches, direct application of 300 nm purified Gbetagamma decreased channel open probability by 55%. The physical interaction of Gbetagamma with BK channels was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation. Interestingly, inhibition of phospholipase C as well as protein kinase C activities also reversed the CCh effect but to a smaller (approximately 20%) extent. Mouse tracheal cells responded similarly to CCh, purified Gbetagamma and phospholipase C/protein kinase C inhibition as M(2)R-expressing HEK293 cells. Our results demonstrate that airway M(2)Rs inhibit BK channels by a dual, Gbetagamma-mediated mechanism, a direct membrane-delimited interaction, and the activation of the phospholipase C/protein kinase C pathway.     

Basal activity of GIRK5 isoforms

G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K(+) channels (GIRK or Kir3) form functional heterotetramers gated by Gbetagamma subunits. GIRK channels are critical for functions as diverse as heart rate modulation and neuronal post-synaptic inhibition. GIRK5 (Kir3.5) is the oocyte homologue of the mammalian GIRK subunits that conform the K(ACh) channel. It has been claimed that even when the oocytes express GIRK5 proteins they do not form functional channels. However, the GIRK5 gene shows three initiation sites that suggest the existence of three isoforms. In a previous work we demonstrated the functionality of homomultimers of the shortest isoform overexpressed in the own oocytes. Remarkably, the basal GIRK5-Delta25 inward currents were not coupled to the activation of a G-protein receptor in the oocytes. These results encouraged us to study this channel in another expression system. In this work we show that Sf21 insect cells can be successfully transfected with this channel. GIRK5-Delta25 homomultimers produce time-dependent inward currents only with GTPgammaS in the recording pipette. Therefore, alternative modes of stimulus input to heterotrimeric G-proteins should be present in the oocytes to account for these results.     

Gbetagamma-dependent and Gbetagamma-independent basal activity of G protein-activated K+ channels

Cardiac and neuronal G protein-activated K+ channels (GIRK; Kir3) open following the binding of Gbetagamma subunits, released from Gi/o proteins activated by neurotransmitters. GIRKs also possess basal activity contributing to the resting potential in neurons. It appears to depend largely on free Gbetagamma, but a Gbetagamma-independent component has also been envisaged. We investigated Gbetagamma dependence of the basal GIRK activity (A(GIRK,basal)) quantitatively, by titrated expression of Gbetagamma scavengers, in Xenopus oocytes expressing GIRK1/2 channels and muscarinic m2 receptors. The widely used Gbetagamma scavenger, myristoylated C terminus of beta-adrenergic kinase (m-cbetaARK), reduced A(GIRK,basal) by 70-80% and eliminated the acetylcholine-evoked current (I(ACh)). However, we found that m-cbetaARK directly binds to GIRK, complicating the interpretation of physiological data. Among several newly constructed Gbetagamma scavengers, phosducin with an added myristoylation signal (m-phosducin) was most efficient in reducing GIRK currents. m-phosducin relocated to the membrane fraction and did not bind GIRK. Titrated expression of m-phosducin caused a reduction of A(GIRK,basal) by up to 90%. Expression of GIRK was accompanied by an increase in the level of Gbetagamma and Galpha in the plasma membrane, supporting the existence of preformed complexes of GIRK with G protein subunits. Increased expression of Gbetagamma and its constitutive association with GIRK may underlie the excessively high A(GIRK,basal) observed at high expression levels of GIRK. Only 10-15% of A(GIRK,basal) persisted upon expression of both m-phosducin and cbetaARK. These results demonstrate that a major part of Ibasal is Gbetagamma-dependent at all levels of channel expression, and only a small fraction (<10%) may be Gbetagamma-independent.     

Overexpression of monomeric and multimeric GIRK4 subunits in rat atrial myocytes removes fast desensitization and reduces inward rectification of muscarinic K(+) current (I(K(ACh))). Evidence for functional homomeric GIRK4 channels

K(+) channels composed of G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying K(+) channel (GIRK) (Kir3.0) subunits are expressed in cardiac, neuronal, and various endocrine tissues. They are involved in inhibiting excitability and contribute to regulating important physiological functions such as cardiac frequency and secretion of hormones. The functional cardiac (K((ACh))) channel activated by G(i)/G(o)-coupled receptors such as muscarinic M(2) or purinergic A(1) receptors is supposed to be composed of the subunits GIRK1 and GIRK4 in a heterotetrameric (2:2) fashion. In the present study, we have manipulated the subunit composition of the K((ACh)) channels in cultured atrial myocytes from hearts of adult rats by transient transfection of vectors encoding for GIRK1 or GIRK4 subunits or GIRK4 concatemeric constructs and investigated the effects on properties of macroscopic I(K(ACh)). Transfection with a GIRK1 vector did not cause any measurable effect on properties of I(K(ACh)), whereas transfection with a GIRK4 vector resulted in a complete loss in desensitization, a reduction of inward rectification, and a slowing of activation. Transfection of myocytes with a construct encoding for a concatemeric GIRK4(2) subunit had similar effects on desensitization and inward rectification. Following transfection of a tetrameric construct (GIRK4(4)), these changes in properties of I(K(ACh)) were still observed but were less pronounced. Heterologous expression in Chinese hamster ovary cells and human embryonic kidney 293 cells of monomeric, dimeric, and tetrameric GIRK4 resulted in robust currents activated by co-expressed A(1) and M(2) receptors, respectively. These data provide strong evidence that homomeric GIRK4 complexes form functional G(beta)gamma gated ion channels and that kinetic properties of GIRK channels, such as activation rate, desensitization, and inward rectification, depend on subunit composition.     

Distinct sites on G protein beta gamma subunits regulate different effector functions

G proteins interact with effectors at multiple sites and regulate their activity. The functional significance of multiple contact points is not well understood. We previously identified three residues on distinct surfaces of Gbetagamma that are crucial for G protein-coupled inward rectifier K(+) (GIRK) channel activation. Here we show that mutations at these sites, S67K, S98T, and T128F, abolished or reduced direct GIRK current activation in inside-out patches, but, surprisingly, all mutants synergized with sodium in activating K(+) currents. Each of the three Gbeta(1) mutants bound the channel indicating that the defects reflected mainly functional impairments. We tested these mutants for functional interactions with effectors other than K(+) channels. With N-type calcium channels, Gbetagamma wild type and mutants all inhibited basal currents. A depolarizing pre-pulse relieved Gbetagamma inhibition of Ca(2+) currents by the wild type and the S98T and T128F mutants but not the S67K mutant. Both wild type and mutant Gbetagamma subunits activated phospholipase C beta(2) with similar potencies; however, the S67K mutant showed reduced maximal activity. These data establish a pattern where mutations can alter the Gbetagamma regulation of a specific effector function without affecting other Gbetagamma-mediated functions. Moreover, Ser-67 showed this pattern in all three effectors tested, suggesting that this residue participates in a common functional domain on Gbeta(1) that regulates several effectors. These data show that distinct domains within Gbetagamma subserve specific functional roles.     

Identification of a potassium channel site that interacts with G protein betagamma subunits to mediate agonist-induced signaling

Activation of heterotrimeric GTP-binding (G) proteins by their coupled receptors, causes dissociation of the G protein alpha and betagamma subunits. Gbetagamma subunits interact directly with G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels to stimulate their activity. In addition, free Gbetagamma subunits, resulting from agonist-independent dissociation of G protein subunits, can account for a major component of the basal channel activity. Using a series of chimeric constructs between GIRK4 and a Gbetagamma-insensitive K+ channel, IRK1, we have identified a critical site of interaction of GIRK with Gbetagamma. Mutation of Leu339 to Glu within this site impaired agonist-induced sensitivity and decreased binding to Gbetagamma, without removing the Gbetagamma contribution to basal currents. Mutation of the corresponding residue in GIRK1 (Leu333) resulted in a similar phenotype. Both the GIRK1 and GIRK4 subunits contributed equally to the agonist-induced sensitivity of the heteromultimeric channel. Thus, we have identified a channel site that interacts specifically with Gbetagamma subunits released through receptor stimulation.     

Selective inhibition of Cav3.3 T-type calcium channels by Galphaq/11-coupled muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

T-type calcium channels play critical roles in controlling neuronal excitability, including the generation of complex spiking patterns and the modulation of synaptic plasticity, although the mechanisms and extent to which T-type Ca(2+) channels are modulated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remain largely unexplored. To examine specific interactions between T-type Ca(2+) channel subtypes and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRS), the Cav3.1 (alpha(1G)), Cav3.2 (alpha(1H)), and Cav3.3 (alpha) T-type Ca(2+)(1I)channels were co-expressed with the M1 Galpha(q/11)-coupled mAChR. Perforated patch recordings demonstrate that activation of M1 receptors has a strong inhibitory effect on Cav3.3 T-type Ca(2+) currents but either no effect or a moderate stimulating effect on Cav3.1 and Cav3.2 peak current amplitudes. This differential modulation was observed for both rat and human T-type Ca(2+) channel variants. The inhibition of Cav3.3 channels by M1 receptors is reversible, use-independent, and associated with a concomitant increase in inactivation kinetics. Loss-of-function experiments with genetically encoded antagonists of Galpha and Gbetagamma proteins and gain-of-function experiments with genetically encoded Galpha subtypes indicate that M1 receptor-mediated inhibition of Cav3.3 occurs through Galpha(q/11). This is supported by experiments showing that activation of the M3 and M5 Galpha(q/11)-coupled mAChRs also causes inhibition of Cav3.3 currents, although Galpha(i)-coupled mAChRs (M2 and M4) have no effect. Examining Cav3.1-Cav3.3 chimeric channels demonstrates that two distinct regions of the Cav3.3 channel are necessary and sufficient for complete M1 receptor-mediated channel inhibition and represent novel sites not previously implicated in T-type channel modulation.     

A new mode of Ca2+ signaling by G protein-coupled receptors: gating of IP3 receptor Ca2+ release channels by Gbetagamma

The most common form of Ca(2+) signaling by Gq-coupled receptors entails activation of PLCbeta2 by Galphaq to generate IP(3) and evoke Ca(2+) release from the ER. Another form of Ca(2+) signaling by G protein-coupled receptors involves activation of Gi to release Gbetagamma, which activates PLCbeta1. Whether Gbetagamma has additional roles in Ca(2+) signaling is unknown. Introduction of Gbetagamma into cells activated Ca(2+) release from the IP(3) Ca(2+) pool and Ca(2) oscillations. This can be due to activation of PLCbeta1 or direct activation of the IP(3)R by Gbetagamma. We report here that Gbetagamma potently activates the IP(3) receptor. Thus, Gbetagamma-triggered [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations are not affected by inhibition of PLCbeta. Coimmunoprecipitation and competition experiments with Gbetagamma scavengers suggest binding of Gbetagamma to IP(3) receptors. Furthermore, Gbetagamma inhibited IP(3) binding to IP(3) receptors. Notably, Gbetagamma activated single IP(3)R channels in native ER as effectively as IP(3). The physiological significance of this form of signaling is demonstrated by the reciprocal sensitivity of Ca(2+) signals evoked by Gi- and Gq-coupled receptors to Gbetagamma scavenging and PLCbeta inhibition. We propose that gating of IP(3)R by Gbetagamma is a new mode of Ca(2+) signaling with particular significance for Gi-coupled receptors.     

Mapping the Gbetagamma-binding sites in GIRK1 and GIRK2 subunits of the G protein-activated K+ channel

G protein-activated K+ channels (Kir3 or GIRK) are activated by direct binding of Gbetagamma. The binding sites of Gbetagamma in the ubiquitous GIRK1 (Kir3.1) subunit have not been unequivocally charted, and in the neuronal GIRK2 (Kir3.2) subunit the binding of Gbetagamma has not been studied. We verified and extended the map of Gbetagamma-binding sites in GIRK1 by using two approaches: direct binding of Gbetagamma to fragments of GIRK subunits (pull down), and competition of these fragments with the Galphai1 subunit for binding to Gbetagamma. We also mapped the Gbetagamma-binding sites in GIRK2. In both subunits, the N terminus binds Gbetagamma. In the C terminus, the Gbetagamma-binding sites in the two subunits are not identical; GIRK1, but not GIRK2, has a previously unrecognized Gbetagamma-interacting segments in the first half of the C terminus. The main C-terminal Gbetagamma-binding segment found in both subunits is located approximately between amino acids 320 and 409 (by GIRK1 count). Mutation of C-terminal leucines 262 or 333 in GIRK1, recognized previously as crucial for Gbetagamma regulation of the channel, and of the corresponding leucines 273 and 344 in GIRK2 dramatically altered the properties of K+ currents via GIRK1/GIRK2 channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes but did not appreciably reduce the binding of Gbetagamma to the corresponding fusion proteins, indicating that these residues are mainly important for the regulation of Gbetagamma-induced changes in channel gating rather than Gbetagamma binding.     

Signaling pathway underlying stimulation of L-type Ca2+ channels in rabbit portal vein myocytes by recombinant Gbetagamma subunits

In previous studies, we (Callaghan B, Koh SD, and Keef KD, Circ Res 94: 626-633, 2004) have shown that voltage-dependent L-type Ca(2+) channels (Cav) in portal vein myocytes are enhanced when muscarinic M2 receptors are activated with ACh. Current stimulation was coupled to the G protein subunit Gbetagamma along with the downstream mediators phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase C (PKC), and c-Src. The present study was designed to determine whether the same second messenger pathway could be identified when exogenous recombinant Gbetagamma subunits are introduced into cells. Smooth muscle myocytes were freshly isolated from rabbit portal vein, and Cav currents were recorded by using the patch-clamp technique. Dialysis of cells with recombinant Gbetagamma (50 nM) significantly increased Cav currents (141%). Nifedipine (1 microM) reduced both control and stimulated currents by approximately 90%. The enhancement of current by Gbetagamma was equivalent to that produced by ACh (142%), whereas the PKC activator phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PdBu) gave rise to greater current stimulation (192%). Current stimulation with Gbetagamma, ACh, and PdBu were not associated with changes in the voltage dependence of activation or inactivation. The PI3K inhibitor LY-294002 (20 microM) reduced peak currents by 32% in cells dialyzed with Gbetagamma, whereas the inactive analog LY-303511 resulted in a small but significant reduction in current (12%). The c-Src inhibitor PP2 (1 microM) also significantly reduced currents (34%), whereas the inactive analog PP3 was without effect. These data provide further evidence for the hypothesis that Gbetagamma leads to stimulation of Cav currents in rabbit portal vein myocytes via a signaling pathway that includes PI3K, PKC, and c-Src.     

The M2 muscarinic G-protein-coupled receptor is voltage-sensitive

G-protein coupled receptors are not considered to exhibit voltage sensitivity. Here, using Xenopus oocytes, we show that the M2 muscarinic receptor (m2R) is voltage-sensitive. The m2R-mediated potassium channel (GIRK) currents were used to assay the activity of m2R. We found that the apparent affinity of m2R toward acetylcholine (ACh) was reduced upon depolarization. Binding experiments of [3H]ACh to individual oocytes expressing m2R confirmed the electrophysiological findings. When the GIRK channels were activated either by overexpression of Gbetagamma subunits or by injection of GTPgammaS, the ratio between the currents measured at -60 mV and +40 mV was the same as for the basal activity of the GIRK channel. Thus, the steps downstream to agonist activation of m2R are not voltage-sensitive. We further found that, in contrast to m2R, the apparent affinity of m1R was increased upon depolarization. We also found that the voltage sensitivity of binding of [3H]ACh to oocytes expressing m2R was greatly diminished following pretreatment with pertussis toxin. The cumulative results suggest that m2R is, by itself, voltage-sensitive. Furthermore, the voltage sensitivity does not reside in the ACh binding site, rather, it most likely resides in the receptor region that couples to the G-protein.