The Mechanism of the Gram Reaction I. The Specificity of the Primary Dye

Dyes of all major types were tested for their suitability as the primary dye in the Gram stain. When a counterstain was not used, some dyes of all types were found to differentiate Gram-positive from Gram-negative organisms. When a counterstain was used, these dyes were found to vary greatly in their suitability. Those dyes found to be good substitutes for crystal violet were: Brilliant green, malachite green, basic fuchsin, ethyl violet, Hoffmann's violet, methyl violet B, and Victoria blue R. All are basic triphenylmethane dyes. Acid dyes were generally not suitable. Differences in the reaction of Gram-positive and Gram-negative cells to Gram staining without the use of iodine were observed and discussed but a practical differentiation could not be achieved in this manner. Certain broad aspects of the chemical mechanism of dyes in the gram stain are discussed.     

The Mechanism of the Gram Reaction. II. The Function of Iodine in the Gram Stain

Fifty-five reagents were studied as to their ability to replace iodine in the Gram stain. None gave results as good as iodine. Eight gave usable Gram preparations, and forty-seven gave negative results. Omission of the counterstain resulted in increasing to thirty-three the number of reagents giving differentiation, but this, was not considered a true Gram differentiation. Many oxidizing agents were shown not to be substitutes for iodine; therefore the function of iodine must be more than to serve as an oxidizing agent. Many reagents which formed precipitates with the dye could not replace iodine; therefore factors other than precipitate formation must be involved. However, all agents which were good substitutes for iodine were both good oxidizing and dye precipitating agents. Experiments involving the study of cell membrane permeability showed that Gram-positive cells were less permeable to iodine in alcoholic solution than Gram-negative cells. This difference could not be demonstrated for iodine in aqueous solution. It was concluded that iodine served to form a dye-iodine precipitate (or complex) in the cell. Since Gram-positive cells were less permeable to iodine in alcohol than Gram-negative cells, this resulted in a slower dissolving out of this complex from Gram-positive cells during de-colorization and hence a slower decolorization time. The relative solubilities of dye precipitates in alcohol and in aqueous safranin solution were also indicated as an important factor influencing decolorization. Dyes which formed highly soluble precipitates with iodine could not be used in the Gram stain. It is not proposed that the mechanism of the Gram stain is entirely one of membrane permeability; chemical factors are undoubtedly important and will be discussed in a later paper. However, it is proposed that the chemical and physical factors are closely interrelated in the Gram stain mechanism.     

Further Studies on a Modification of the Gram Stain

In perfecting the modification of the Gram-stain previously proposed, the following points are of interest:

1. Acetone is too strong a decolorizer for Gram-positive organisms and alcohol too weak for Gram-negative organisms. Consequently, it is now recommended that equal parts of acetone (100% c.p.) and ethyl alcohol (95%) be used as a decolorizing agent. The time of application should not ordinarily exceed 10 seconds.

2. Aqueous basic fuchsin (0.1%) serves as a strongly contrasting counterstain. Prolonged application renders Gram-positive organisms doubtful or Gram-negative, while short application renders Gram-negative organisms doubtful or Gram-positive. Twenty (20) seconds is therefore recommended as the time of application of the counterstain.

3. The method here described, with due regard for its limitations, is of value in Gram-staining pure or mixed cultures as well as for organic materials, such as Acidophilus milk, feces, etc., either for research purposes or classroom use. The method is as follows:

Air-dry film and fix with least amount of heat necessary.

Flood with dye for 5 minutes. Previously mix 30 drops of a 1% aqueous solution of crystal violet or methyl violet 6B with 8 drops of a 5% solution of sodium bicarbonate. Allow the mixture to remain for 5 minutes or more.

Flush with iodine solution for 2 minutes. Two grams iodine dissolved in 10 cc. normal sodium hydroxide solution and 90 cc. water added.

Drain without blotting but do not allow film to dry.

Add a mixture of equal parts of acetone and alcohol drop by drop until the drippings are colorless. (10 seconds or less.)

Air-dry slide.

Counterstain for 20 seconds with 0.1% aqueous solution of basic fuchsin.

Wash off excess stain by short exposure to tap water and air-dry. If slide is not clear immersion in xylol is recommended.     

Stability of the Gram Reaction

In the course of about 7000 examinations of Gram-positive aerobic bacteria, it was found that two distinct groups of Gram-positive organisms could be recognized. One group was illustrated by Micrococcus freudenreichii, the other by Bacillus anthracis. All individuals in a smear of the former remained positive even when the time of exposure to stain was greatly diminished and the time of exposure to decolorizer was greatly increased. Similar changes of technic when B. anthracis was used showed that about 70% of the individuals in a given smear became Gram-negative. The writer accordingly distinguishes between stable and unstable Gram-positive bacteria.     

Volutin as a Substrate of the Gram Reaction

A modified Gram procedure, with the use of an extremely diluted or acidified crystal violet solution, stained only volutin in contrast with nonstaining of the rest of cell in Gram-positive bacteria. The substrate of the Gram reaction is not only a ribonucleic acid-magnesium-protein complex in cytoplasm (Henry and Stacey 1946), but also a metaphosphate-ribonucleic acid complex in volutin and deoxyribonucleic acid in nuclei in Gram-positive cells. The isoelectric-point theory and permeability theory of the Gram stain are unsupported by the experiments.     

寡居种悦目金蛛若蛛群居机制初步研究

对寡居种悦目金蛛Argiope amoena若蛛群居生活对其结网的影响、温度和种群大小对若蛛存活率的影响、若蛛对限制性空间的利用及其扩散方式进行了观察和研究.结果表明,若蛛从卵袋出蛰后不经历群居扩散即具备结网能力,可结完整网,也具备在扩散前不进食水存活的能力;在变温条件下若蛛存活率要远远高于室温条件下的存活率,而在室温条件下若蛛开始死亡和半数死亡的时间比其聚居期长得多;若蛛主要通过群体空中扩散的方式进行扩散,可以减小能耗与敌害的威胁;不同种群大小的若蛛在限制性空间的分布均从第5d左右开始发生较大变化的,这与在空间不受限的条件下若蛛在第5d开始扩散的结果是一致的.据此我们推断:个体扩散代价最小化(包括御敌和能耗)和维持种群较高的生存率可能是寡居种悦目金蛛若蛛群居生活的主要原因.     

The Gram Staining Mechanism of Cat Tongue Keratin. II. The Role of Potassium Iodide-Iodine Solution

The aniline-xylene decolorizer of the Gram-Weigert staining procedure failed to remove crystal violet dye from stained sections of cat tongue without prior treatment of the sections with potassium iodide-iodine solution. The potassium iodide of the iodide-iodine solution was found to release the major part of the crystal violet dye bound by the tongue sections. Iodine appeared also to play a role in dye release, but only to a slight degree. The amount of Gram-positive staining was increased both by alkaline treatment of the tissue prior to staining, and by increasing the pH of the iodide-iodine solution.