RecA protein-promoted cleavage of LexA repressor in the presence of ADP and structural analogues of inorganic phosphate, the fluoride complexes of aluminum and beryllium

Complexes formed from A13+ or Be2+ and fluoride inhibit the single-stranded DNA-dependent ATPase activity of RecA protein. In contrast, poly(dT)-RecA-ADP complexes, which are inactive for cleavage of LexA protein, become fully active in the presence of AlF4- or BeF3- ions. These data suggest that fluoride complexes of aluminum and beryllium (called herein X) convert RecA-ADP complexes, which bind weakly to single-stranded DNA, into RecA-ADP-X complexes, which bind tightly to single-stranded DNA, the ADP-X moiety behaving as a nonhydrolyzable analogue of ATP. We propose that AlF4- and BeF3- ions act as analogues of inorganic phosphate by binding to the site of the gamma-phosphate of ATP on RecA-ADP complexes, hence mimicking the single-stranded DNA-RecA-ADP-Pi transition state. We conclude that the elementary reaction that switches RecA protein from a high affinity single-stranded DNA binding state to a low affinity single-stranded DNA binding state is not ATP hydrolysis per se but Pi release.     

Stimulation of RecA-mediated cleavage of phage phi 80 cI repressor by deoxydinucleotides

The presence of either deoxyguanylyl-(3'----5')-deoxyguanosine (d(G-G] or deoxyadenylyl-(3'----5')-deoxyguanosine (d(A-G] greatly stimulates cleavage of the phage phi 80 cI repressor mediated by the Escherichia coli RecA protein in vitro. No other deoxydinucleoside monophosphate or riboguanylyl-(3'----5')-guanosine (r(G-G] affects the cleavage reaction. Neither the cleavage site of the phi 80 cI repressor nor the requirement for single-stranded DNA and ATP for cleavage is altered by d(G-G). Photoaffinity labeling experiments with 32P-labeled 5'-phosphoryl deoxyguanylyl deoxyguanosine (pd(G-G], which also stimulates cleavage, show that pd(G-G) bound to the repressor under the conditions in which the repressor is cleaved by RecA protein. The binding increases the affinity of the repressor for RecA protein and thus greatly stimulates repressor cleavage. The cleavage reactions of LexA and lambda cI repressors by RecA protein are not affected by d(G-G).     

Activation of protease-constitutive recA proteins of Escherichia coli by rRNA and tRNA.

The RecA proteins of the unusually strong protease-constitutive mutants recA1202 and recA1211 can use RNA in addition to single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) as a cofactor in the cleavage of the LexA repressor in vitro. In the presence of rRNA or tRNA, the effectiveness of these proteins decreased in the order RecA1202 greater than RecA1211 much greater than RecA+, which is also the order of their in vivo constitutive protease activities. The effectiveness of rRNA was comparable to that of ssDNA in the cleavage of the LexA repressor by either mutant protease. Although all the common nucleoside triphosphates can act as positive effectors for LexA cleavage by the two mutant proteins in the presence of ssDNA (W. B. Wang, M. Sassanfar, I. Tessman, J. W. Roberts, and E. S. Tessman, J. Bacteriol. 170:4816-4822, 1988), only dATP, ATP, and ATP-gamma-S were effective in the presence of RNA. Our results explain more fully why certain recA mutants have high constitutive protease activities in vivo.     

Purification and characterization of the RecA protein from Streptococcus pneumoniae

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a naturally transformable bacterium that is able to take up single-stranded DNA from its environment and incorporate the exogenous DNA into its genome. This process, known as transformational recombination, is dependent upon the presence of the recA gene, which encodes an ATP-dependent DNA recombinase whose sequence is 60% identical to that of the RecA protein from Escherichia coli. We have developed an overexpression system for the S. pneumoniae RecA protein and have purified the protein to greater than 99% homogeneity. The S. pneumoniae RecA protein has ssDNA-dependent NTP hydrolysis and NTP-dependent DNA strand exchange activities that are generally similar to those of the E. coli RecA protein. In addition to its role as a DNA recombinase, the E. coli RecA protein also acts as a coprotease, which facilitates the cleavage and inactivation of the E. coli LexA repressor during the SOS response to DNA damage. Interestingly, the S. pneumoniae RecA protein is also able to promote the cleavage of the E. coli LexA protein, even though a protein analogous to the LexA protein does not appear to be present in S. pneumoniae.     

Physical interactions between DinI and RecA nucleoprotein filament for the regulation of SOS mutagenesis

The Escherichia coli dinI gene is one of the LexA-regulated genes, which are induced upon DNA damage. Its overexpression conferred severe UV sensitivity on wild-type cells and resulted in the inhibition of LexA and UmuD processing, reactions that are normally dependent on activated RecA in a complex with single-stranded (ss)DNA. Here, we study the mechanism by which DinI inhibits the activities of RecA. While DinI neither binds to ssDNA nor prevents the formation of RecA nucleoprotein filament, it binds to active RecA filament, thereby inhibiting its coprotease activity but not the ATPase activity. Furthermore, even under in vitro conditions where UmuD cleavage dependent on RecA-ssDNA-adeno sine-5'-(3-thiotriphosphate) is blocked in the presence of DinI, LexA is cleaved normally. This result, taken together with electron microscopy observations and linear dichroism measurements, indicates that the ternary complex remains intact in the presence of DinI, and that the affinity to the RecA filament decreases in the order LexA, DinI and UmuD. DinI is thus suited to modulating UmuD processing so as to limit SOS mutagenesis.     

Activation of protease-constitutive recA proteins of Escherichia coli by all of the common nucleoside triphosphates.

To understand why the RecA proteins of the protease-constitutive recA1202 and recA1211 mutants show very high protease activities in vivo without the usual need for DNA damage (E. S. Tessman and P. Peterson, J. Bacteriol. 163:677-687, 1985), we examined the activation of the mutant proteins by nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs) in vitro. In vivo, the mutant protease activities are resistant to inhibition by cytidine plus guanosine (C + G) in the growth medium, in contrast to the activities of weaker mutants, such as recA441, which are sensitive to C + G inhibition. We found that RecA1202 and RecA1211 proteins, in contrast to RecA+, can use natural NTPs other than ATP and dATP as cofactors in the cleavage of LexA repressor. The effectiveness of NTPs in promoting LexA cleavage by RecA1202 and RecA1211 proteins decreased in roughly the following order: dATP greater than ATP greater than UTP greater than ATP-gamma S greater than dCTP greater than CTP greater than dGTP greater than GTP greater than TTP. These mutant proteins showed higher affinities for ATP and single-stranded DNA and higher repressor cleavage activities than RecA+ protein. With the various effectors (single-stranded DNA or NTPs), the RecA1202 protein always showed more activity than RecA1211 in the cleavage of LexA repressor in vitro, which is consistent with the greater activity of the recA1202 mutant in vivo. The results explain, in part, why some recA mutants have unusually high constitutive RecA protease activity and why that activity is more or less resistant to C + G inhibition.     

Cleavage of bacteriophage phi 80 CI repressor by RecA protein

We have purified the CI repressor protein of bacteriophage phi 80. Its N-terminal amino acid sequence and its amino acid composition agree with those predicted from the nucleotide sequence of the cI gene. The phi 80 CI repressor was cleaved at a Cys-Gly bond by the wildtype RecA protein in the presence of single-stranded DNA and ATP or its analogues. This cleavage site is different from other repressors such as LexA, lambda CI and P22 C2, which were cleaved at an Ala-Gly bond. The phi 80 CI repressor was cleaved at the same site by the RecA430 protein, but was not cleaved by the RecA1 protein. This effect of the bacterial recA mutations on cleavage is consistent with the fact that prophage phi 80 in recA430 cells can be induced by irradiation with ultraviolet light, while the prophage in recA1 cells cannot.     

RecA protein and SOS. Correlation of mutagenesis phenotype with binding of mutant RecA proteins to duplex DNA and LexA cleavage

The RecA protein of Escherichia coli is required for SOS-induced mutagenesis in addition to its recombinational and regulatory roles. We have suggested that RecA might participate directly in targeted mutagenesis by binding preferentially to the site of the DNA damage (e.g. pyrimidine dimer) because of its partially unwound nature; DNA polymerase III will then encounter RecA-coated DNA at the lesion and might replicate across the damaged site more often but with reduced fidelity. In support of this proposal, we have found that the phenotype of wild-type and mutant RecA for mutagenesis correlates with capacity to bind to double-stranded DNA. Wild-type RecA binds more efficiently to ultraviolet (u.v.)-irradiated, duplex DNA than to non-irradiated DNA. The RecA441 (Tif) protein that is constitutive for mutagenesis binds extremely well to double-stranded DNA with no lesions, whereas the RecA430 protein that is defective in mutagenesis binds poorly even to u.v.-irradiated DNA. The RecA phenotype also correlates with capacity to use duplex DNA as a cofactor for cleavage of the LexA repressor protein for SOS-controlled operons. Wild-type RecA provides efficient cleavage of LexA only with u.v.-irradiated duplex DNA; RecA441 cleaves well with non-irradiated DNA; RecA430 gives very poor cleavage even with u.v.-irradiated DNA. We conclude that the interaction of RecA with damaged double-stranded DNA is likely to be a critical component of SOS mutagenesis and to define a pathway for the LexA cleavage reaction as well.     

New phenotypes associated with mucAB: alteration of a MucA sequence homologous to the LexA cleavage site.

Most mutagenesis by UV and many chemicals in Escherichia coli requires the products of the umuDC operon or an analogous plasmid-derived operon mucAB. Activated RecA protein is also required for, or enhances, this process. MucA and UmuD proteins share homology with the LexA protein, suggesting that they might interact with the RecA protein as LexA does. We used oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis to alter a site in MucA homologous to the Ala-Gly cleavage site of LexA. The mutation, termed mucA101(Glu26), results in a change of Gly26 of MucA to Glu26. A lexA(Def) recA441 umuC122::Tn5 strain carrying a mucA101(Glu26)B+ plasmid did not exhibit the greatly increased frequency of spontaneous mutagenesis in response to RecA activation that a strain carrying a mucA+B+ plasmid did but retained a basal recA-dependent ability to confer increased spontaneous mutagenesis that was independent of the state of RecA activation. These results are consistent with a model in which RecA plays two distinct roles in mutagenesis apart from its role in the cleavage of LexA. A pBR322-derived plasmid carrying mucA+B+, but not one carrying mucA101(Glu26)B+, inhibited the UV induction of SOS genes, suggesting that MucA+ and MucA(Glu26) proteins may have different abilities to compete with LexA for activated RecA protein. The spectrum of UV-induced mutagenesis was also altered in strains carrying the mucA101(Glu26) mutation. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that activated RecA protein interacts with wild-type MucA protein, possibly promoting proteolytic cleavage, and that this interaction is responsible for facilitating certain mutagenic processes.     

Nature of the SOS-inducing signal in Escherichia coli. The involvement of DNA replication

The SOS genes of Escherichia coli, which include many DNA repair genes, are induced by DNA damage. Although the central biochemical event in induction, activation of RecA protein through binding of single-stranded DNA and ATP to promote cleavage of the LexA repressor, is known, the cellular event that provides this activation following DNA damage has not been well understood. We provide evidence here that the major pathway of induction after damage by a typical agent, ultraviolet light, requires an active replication fork; this result supports the model that DNA replication leaves gaps where elongation stops at damage-induced lesions, and thus provides the single-stranded DNA that activates RecA protein. In order to detect quantitatively the immediate product of the inducing signal, activated RecA protein, we have designed an assay to measure the rate of disappearance of intact LexA repressor. With this assay, we have studied the early phase of the induction process. LexA cleavage is detectable within minutes after DNA damage and occurs in the absence of protein synthesis. By following the reaccumulation of LexA in the cell, we detect repair of DNA and the disappearance of the inducing signal. Using this assay, we have measured the LexA content of wild-type and various mutant cells, characterized the kinetics and conditions for development of the inducing signal after various inducing treatments and, finally, have shown the requirement for DNA replication in SOS induction by ultraviolet light.     

Role of Escherichia coli RecA protein in SOS induction and post-replication repair

The RecA protein of Escherichia coli plays a central role in DNA repair mechanisms. When it is incubated with single-stranded DNA and a nucleoside triphosphate, the purified RecA protein acts both by promoting cleavage of the LexA protein, the repressor of the SOS genes, and by catalyzing strand exchange between a variety of DNA molecules. A model for the regulation of the activity of the RecA protein in a cell exposed to a DNA damaging treatment is proposed.     

Loop L1 governs the DNA-binding specificity and order for RecA-catalyzed reactions in homologous recombination and DNA repair

In all organisms, RecA-family recombinases catalyze homologous joint formation in homologous genetic recombination, which is essential for genome stability and diversification. In homologous joint formation, ATP-bound RecA/Rad51-recombinases first bind single-stranded DNA at its primary site and then interact with double-stranded DNA at another site. The underlying reason and the regulatory mechanism for this conserved binding order remain unknown. A comparison of the loop L1 structures in a DNA-free RecA crystal that we originally determined and in the reported DNA-bound active RecA crystals suggested that the aspartate at position 161 in loop L1 in DNA-free RecA prevented double-stranded, but not single-stranded, DNA-binding to the primary site. This was confirmed by the effects of the Ala-replacement of Asp-161 (D161A), analyzed directly by gel-mobility shift assays and indirectly by DNA-dependent ATPase activity and SOS repressor cleavage. When RecA/Rad51-recombinases interact with double-stranded DNA before single-stranded DNA, homologous joint-formation is suppressed, likely by forming a dead-end product. We found that the D161A-replacement reduced this suppression, probably by allowing double-stranded DNA to bind preferentially and reversibly to the primary site. Thus, Asp-161 in the flexible loop L1 of wild-type RecA determines the preference for single-stranded DNA-binding to the primary site and regulates the DNA-binding order in RecA-catalyzed recombinase reactions.     

Absorption and fluorescence studies of the binding of the recA gene product from E. coli to single-stranded and double-stranded DNA. Ionic strength dependence

The binding of the recA gene product from E. coli to double-stranded and single-stranded nucleic acids has been investigated by following the change in melting temperature of duplex DNA and the fluorescence of single-stranded DNA or poly(dA) modified by reaction with chloroacetaldehyde. At low ionic strength, in the absence of Mg2+ ions, RecA protein binds preferentially to duplex DNA or poly(dA-dT). This leads to an increase of the DNA melting temperature. Stabilization of duplex DNA decreases when ionic strength or pH increases. In the presence of Mg2+ ions, preferential binding to single-stranded polynucleotides is observed. Precipitation occurs when duplex DNA begins to melt in the presence of RecA protein. From competition experiments, different single-stranded and double-stranded polydeoxynucleotides can be ranked according to their ability to bind RecA protein. Structural changes induced in nucleic acids upon RecA binding are discussed together with conformational changes induced in RecA protein upon magnesium binding.     

Biochemical characterization of a mutant RecA protein altered in DNA-binding loop 1

The double substitution of Glu156 with Leu and Gly157 with Val in the Escherichia coli RecA protein results in a severely reduced level of recombination and constitutive coprotease behavior. Here we present our examination of the biochemical properties of this mutant protein, RecA N99, in an effort to understand its phenotype and the role of loop 1 (L1) in RecA function. We find that RecA N99 protein has reduced single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-dependent ATP hydrolysis activity, which is not as sensitive to the presence of SSB protein as wild-type RecA protein. RecA N99 protein is also nearly unable to utilize duplex DNA as a polynucleotide cofactor for ATP hydrolysis, and it shows both a decreased rate of association with ssDNA and a diminished capacity to bind DNA in the secondary binding site. The mutant protein has a corresponding reduction in DNA strand exchange activity, which probably results in the decrease in recombination activity in vivo. The constitutive induction of the SOS response may be a consequence of the impaired ability to repair damaged DNA, resulting in unrepaired ssDNA which can act as a cofactor for the cleavage of LexA repressor. These findings point to an involvement of L1 in both the primary and secondary DNA binding sites of the RecA protein.     

Separation of recombination and SOS response in Escherichia coli RecA suggests LexA interaction sites

RecA plays a key role in homologous recombination, the induction of the DNA damage response through LexA cleavage and the activity of error-prone polymerase in Escherichia coli. RecA interacts with multiple partners to achieve this pleiotropic role, but the structural location and sequence determinants involved in these multiple interactions remain mostly unknown. Here, in a first application to prokaryotes, Evolutionary Trace (ET) analysis identifies clusters of evolutionarily important surface amino acids involved in RecA functions. Some of these clusters match the known ATP binding, DNA binding, and RecA-RecA homo-dimerization sites, but others are novel. Mutation analysis at these sites disrupted either recombination or LexA cleavage. This highlights distinct functional sites specific for recombination and DNA damage response induction. Finally, our analysis reveals a composite site for LexA binding and cleavage, which is formed only on the active RecA filament. These new sites can provide new drug targets to modulate one or more RecA functions, with the potential to address the problem of evolution of antibiotic resistance at its root.     

Inhibition of RecA protein function by the RdgC protein from Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli RdgC protein is a potential negative regulator of RecA function. RdgC inhibits RecA protein-promoted DNA strand exchange, ATPase activity, and RecA-dependent LexA cleavage. The primary mechanism of RdgC inhibition appears to involve a simple competition for DNA binding sites, especially on duplex DNA. The capacity of RecA to compete with RdgC is improved by the DinI protein. RdgC protein can inhibit DNA strand exchange catalyzed by RecA nucleoprotein filaments formed on single-stranded DNA by binding to the homologous duplex DNA and thereby blocking access to that DNA by the RecA nucleoprotein filaments. RdgC protein binds to single-stranded and double-stranded DNA, and the protein can be visualized on DNA using electron microscopy. RdgC protein exists in solution as a mixture of oligomeric states in equilibrium, most likely as monomers, dimers, and tetramers. This concentration-dependent change of state appears to affect its mode of binding to DNA and its capacity to inhibit RecA. The various species differ in their capacity to inhibit RecA function.     

A partially deficient mutant, recA1730, that fails to form normal nucleoprotein filaments.

Summary The phenotype of the recA1730 mutant is highly dependent on the level of expression of the RecA1730 protein. If the recA1730 gene was expressed from its own promoter, the cells were deficient in recombination and SOS induction. In contrast, when the recA1730 gene was expressed under the control of recAo98, a constitutive operator that increased the RecA1730 concentration 20-fold, cells became proficient in recombination and SOS induction. Likewise, in crude extracts, fivefold more RecA1730 than RecAwt was required to produce full cleavage of LexA protein. The requirement for a high RecA1730 concentration for recombination and LexA cleavage suggests that the recA1730 defect alters a common reaction step. In fact, in vitro data show that the impaired assembly of RecA1730 protein on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) can account for the mutant phenotype. Purified RecA1730 protein was assayed in vitro for ssDNA binding and ATPase activities. RecA1730, like RecAwt, retained ssDNA equally well on nitrocellulose filters; this activity was specifically inhibited by a monoclonal anti-RecA antibody. However, RecA1730 protein did not form complete filaments on ssDNA, as shown by two observations: (i) most of the protein did not elute with ssDNA during gel filtration; and (ii) binding of RecA1730 to ssDNA did not protect it from being digested by DNaseI. RecA1730 hydrolysed ATP in high salt but was defective in ssDNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis. These results strongly suggest that RecA1730 binds to ATP and ssDNA but does not form normal nucleoprotein filaments.Abbreviations RecAwt RecA wind-type protein - ssDNA singlestranded DNA - dsDNA dmble-stranded DNA     

Constitutive expression of the SOS response in recA718 mutants of Escherichia coli requires amplification of RecA718 protein.

In recA718 lexA+ strains of Escherichia coli, induction of the SOS response requires DNA damage. This implies that RecA718 protein, like RecA+ protein, must be converted, by a process initiated by the damage, to an activated form (RecA) to promote cleavage of LexA, the cellular repressor of SOS genes. However, when LexA repressor activity was abolished by a lexA-defective mutation [lexA(Def)], strains carrying the recA718 gene (but not recA+) showed strong SOS mutator activity and were able to undergo stable DNA replication in the absence of DNA damage (two SOS functions known to require RecA activity even when cleavage of LexA is not necessary). lambda lysogens of recA718 lexA(Def) strains exhibited mass induction of prophage, indicative of constitutive ability to cleave lambda repressor. When the cloned recA718 allele was present in a lexA+ strain on a plasmid, SOS mutator activity and beta-galactosidase synthesis under LexA control were expressed in proportion to the plasmid copy number. We conclude that RecA718 is capable of becoming activated without DNA damage for cleavage of LexA and lambda repressor, but only if it is amplified above its base-line level in lexA+ strains. At amplified levels, RecA718 was also constitutively activated for its roles in SOS mutagenesis and stable DNA replication. The nucleotide sequence of recA718 reveals two base substitutions relative to the recA+ sequence. We propose that the first allows the protein to become activated constitutively, whereas the second partially suppresses this capability.     

Non-mutability by ultraviolet light in uvrD recB derivatives of Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA is due to inhibition of RecA protein activation

The deficiency in UV mutagenesis in uvrD3 recB21 strains of E. coli is almost completely overcome by constitutive activation of RecA protein and expression of the SOS system (by recA730 or 43 degrees C treated recA441 lexA71). When SOS was expressed but RecA protein not self-activated (recA441 lexA71 at 30 degrees C), uvrD3 recB21 still reduced UV mutagenesis at low doses. The uvrD3 recB21 combination is therefore inhibiting activation of RecA protein. It is suggested that the DNA unwinding activity of the products of the uvrD and recB genes may be involved in generating single-stranded DNA needed to activate RecA protein both for the cleavage of LexA repressor and for a further role in UV mutagenesis.     

Regulation in repressor inactivation by RecA protein

Treatments that damage DNA or inhibit DNA synthesis in E. coli induce the expression of a set of functions called SOS functions that are involved in DNA repair, mutagenesis, arrest of cell division and prophage induction. Induction of SOS functions is triggered by inactivation of the LexA repressor or a phage repressor. Inactivation of these repressors results from their cleavage by the E. coli RecA protein in the presence of single-stranded DNA and a nucleoside triphosphate.We found that these cleavage reactions are controlled by two mechanisms in vitro: one is through the structural change of the RecA protein in the ternary complex, RecA-ssDNA-ATP-γ-S. The active ternary complex is formed by binding of ATP-γ-S to a complex of RecA protein and ssDNA. On the other hand, when the RecA protein binds to ATP-γ-S prior to its binding to ssDNA, the resulting complex has no or only very weak cleavage activity toward the repressor. This structural change is negatively controlled by its C-terminal part. The loss of the 25 amino acid residues from the C-terminal leads the RecA protein to stable binding to dsDNA as well as ssDNA, and the protein takes the activated form for the repressor cleavage constitutively. The other mechanism is through the structural change of the repressor. The cleavage reaction of a ∅80cI repressor is greatly stimulated by the presence of d(G-G), and d(G-G) stimulates the cleavage by binding to the C-terminal half of the ∅80cI repressor. Moreover, the C-terminal fragment of the cleaved products of the 80cI repressor was able to cleave a ∅80cI-λ chimeric repressor. These results strongly suggested that th active site of the repressor cleavage was located in the C-terminal domain of the repressor and that the C-terminal fragment produced by the cleavage could cleave the repressor.