Prevalence of macroprolactin detected by Elecsys 2010

BACKGROUND: Macroprolactin or big-big PRL is, usually, a complex of little prolactin (PRL) with anti-PRL autoantibody. There are some patients with hyperprolactinemia showing a high proportion of serum macroprolactin. However, its clinical significance is not clear. Immunoassays used to determine PRL differ in their ability to detect macroprolactin. Moreover, in recent years, PRL assays have changed from isotopic methods (radioimmunoassays and immunoradiometric assays) to non-isotopic automated immunoassays. The effect of macroprolactin on currently used methods is often unknown. The aim of this work was to study the different reactivity of macroprolactin in two immunoassays systems, Elecsys 2010 and ACS Centaur, and to assess the clinical repercussion of this condition. METHODS: We studied retrospectively 956 consecutive routine patients. Samples with a PRL value >636 mIU/l (211 samples) were subjected to the polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation test to detect macroprolactin, and 2 of them also to gel filtration chromatography for further confirmation. PRL was measured by Elecsys 2010 and, alternatively, by ACS Centaur. RESULTS: By Elecsys 2010, macroprolactin was detected in 19 patients (9%). After removing macroprolactin, PRL levels were within the normal range in every case but one. When original sera from patients with macroprolactin were processed with ACS Centaur. PRL levels were normal or only marginally elevated. The correlation of PRL values in samples with and without macroprolactin assayed by both systems was 0.64 and 0.98, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 9% of hyperprolactinemic patients detected by Elecsys 2010 may have macroprolactin, but the detection rate obtained using ACS Centaur is much lower. As macroprolactin seems to have minimal clinical relevance, it would be important that the users of PRL assays be aware to what extent macroprolactin interferes with their assays, and have available a validated method, such as the PEG precipitation test, to confirm the presence of macroprolactin.     

Short-Term Decline in Prolactin Concentrations Can Predict Future Prolactin Normalization,Tumor Shrinkage,and Time to Remission in Men with Macroprolactinomas

Objective: To identify early follow-up measures that will predict the dynamics of prolactin (PRL) decrease and adenoma shrinkage in men harboring macroprolactinomas.Methods: A single-center historical prospective study including a consecutive group of 71 men with pituitary macroadenomas (≥10 mm) and hyperprolactinemia (PRL >7 times the upper limit of normal &lsqb;ULN]) treated medically with cabergoline. Comparisons of PRL normalization rates were performed according to PRL levels achieved at 6 months, maximal adenoma shrinkage during follow-up, and other patient characteristics. Correlations were analyzed to identify characteristics of PRL suppression dynamics.Results: PRL levels after 6 months of treatment correlated positively with current PRL levels (r = 0.74; P<.001), with time to PRL normalization (r = 0.75; P<.001), and with adenoma diameter following treatment (r = 0.38; P = .01). Adenoma shrinkage depicted by first magnetic resonance imaging on treatment correlated with maximal adenoma shrinkage during follow-up (r = 0.56; P = .006). Five patients had nadir PRL levels ≥3 times the ULN (51 ng/mL) and showed slower response to cabergoline treatment, with consistently higher PRL levels compared with responding patients throughout follow-up (mean 6-month PRL levels, 519 ± 403 ng/mL versus 59 ± 118 ng/mL; P<.001).Conclusion: Six-month PRL level might serve as a surrogate marker for PRL normalization and adenoma shrinkage dynamics among men harboring macroprolactinomas.Abbreviations: CAB = cabergoline MRI = magnetic resonance imaging PRL = prolactin RMC = Rabin Medical Centre ULN = upper limit of normal     

Preclinical Atherosclerosis in Patients with Prolactinoma

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hyperprolactinemia on body fat, insulin sensitivity, inflammatory markers, and cardiovascular risk in patients with prolactinoma.MethodsThe study included 35 untreated hyperprolactinemic patients with pituitary adenomas, and 36 age-, gender-, and body mass index (BMI)-matched healthy controls without any known disease. Serum glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR, lipid profile, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) levels were measured. Waist and hip circumference (WC and HC) were measured in all the participants. The body fat percentage was measured, and the visceral fat and abdominal fat percentages were measured via bioelectrical impedance (BIA). In addition, carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) was measured using high-resolution B-mode ultrasound.ResultsThe serum glucose level, HOMA-IR, triglyceride level, and SC were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group. The hs-CRP level and CIMT were significantly higher in the hyperprolactinemic patients. Visceral and truncal fat percentages were significantly higher in the patients with prolactinoma. H-FABP levels were similar in the 2 groups, and there was a positive correlation between the prolactin (PRL) and H-FABP protein levels.ConclusionsBased on the present findings, hyperprolactinemia is associated with preclinical atherosclerosis and metabolic abnormalities. Patients with hyperprolactinemia might experience cardiovascular disease in the long term. Metabolic control should be achieved in addition to the control of hyperprolactinemia in the clinical management of patients diagnosed with prolactinoma. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:447-451)     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists And American College of Endocrinology Disease State Clinical Review: Postoperative Management Following Pituitary Surgery

Pituitary lesions are common in the general population. Patients can present with a wide range of signs and symptoms that can be related to tumor mass effects or pituitary hormonal alterations. Evaluation involves assessing patients for the extent of tumor burden and pituitary hyper- or hypofunction and includes clinical exams, hormonal testing, and brain imaging. Preoperative diagnosis and treatment planning generally require a multidisciplinary team approach with expertise from endocrinologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-ophthalmologists, and neuroradiologists. This review will outline considerations for the evaluation and management of patients with pituitary masses at each stage in their treatment including the pre-, peri- and postoperative phases.Abbreviations: ADH = antidiuretic hormone CSF = cerebrospinal fluid DDAVP = desmopressin DI = diabetes insipidus GH = growth hormone MRI = magnetic resonance imaging SIADH = syndrome of inappropriate ADH release TSS = transsphenoidal surgery     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Disease State Clinical Review on the Evaluation and Management of Adrenocortical Carcinoma in an Adult: a Practical Approach

Objective: The aim of this Disease State Clinical Review is to provide a practical approach to patients with newly diagnosed adrenocortical carcinoma, as well as to follow-up and management of patients with persistent or recurrent disease.Methods: This is a case-based clinical review. The provided recommendations are based on evidence available from randomized prospective clinical studies, cohort studies, cross-sectional and case-based studies, and expert opinions.Results: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare malignancy, often with poor outcomes. For any patient with an adrenal mass suspicious for adrenocortical carcinoma, the approach should include prompt evaluation with detailed history and physical exam, imaging, and biochemical adrenal hormone assessment. In addition to adrenal-focused imaging, patients should be evaluated with chest-abdomen-pelvis cross-sectional imaging to define the initial therapy plan. Patients with potentially resectable disease limited to the adrenal gland should undergo en bloc open surgery by an expert surgeon. For patients presenting with advanced or recurrent disease, a multidisciplinary approach considering curative repeat surgery, local control with surgery, radiation therapy or radiofrequency ablation, or systemic therapy with mitotane and/or cytotoxic chemotherapy is recommended.Conclusion: As most health care providers will rarely encounter a patient with adrenocortical carcinoma, we recommend that patients with suspected adrenocortical carcinoma be evaluated by an expert multidisciplinary team which includes clinicians with expertise in adrenal tumors, including endocrinologists, oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, pathologists, geneticists, and radiologists. We recommend that patients in remote locations be followed by the local health care provider in collaboration with a multidisciplinary team at an expert adrenal tumor program.Abbreviations: ACC = adrenocortical carcinoma; ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; BRACC = borderline resectable adrenocortical carcinoma; CT = computed tomography; DHEAS = dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; EDP = etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin; FDG = ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; HU = Hounsfield units; IVC = inferior vena cava; LFS = Li-Fraumeni syndrome; MEN1 = multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; OAC = oncocytic adrenocortical carcinoma; PC = palliative care; PET = positron emission tomography     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Disease State Clinical Review: A Neuroendocrine Approach to Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury

Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is now recognized as a major public health concern in the United States and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality in both children and adults. Several lines of evidence indicate that TBI-induced hypopituitarism is not infrequent in TBI survivors and may contribute to the burden of illness in this population. The goal of this article is to review the published data and propose an approach for the neuroendocrine evaluation and management of these patients.Methods: To identify pertinent articles, electronic literature searches were conducted using the following keywords: “traumatic brain injury,” “pituitary,” “hypopituitarism,” “growth hormone deficiency,” “hypogonadism,” “hypoadrenalism,” and “hypothyroidism.” Relevant articles were identified and considered for inclusion in the present article.Results: TBI-induced hypopituitarism appears to be more common in patients with severe TBI. However, patients with mild TBI or those with repeated, sports-, or blast-related TBI are also at risk for hypopituitarism. Deficiencies of growth hormone and gonadotropins appear to be most common and have been associated with increased morbidity in this population. A systematic approach is advised in order to establish the presence of pituitary hormone deficiencies and implement appropriate replacement therapies.Conclusion: The presence of traumatic hypopituitarism should be considered during the acute phase as well as during the rehabilitation phase of patients with TBI. All patients with moderate to severe TBI require evaluation of pituitary function. In addition, symptomatic patients with mild TBI and impaired quality of life are at risk for hypopituitarism and should be offered neuroendocrine testing.Abbreviations: CBG = corticosteroid-binding globulin DI = diabetes insipidus GH = growth hormone IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1 SIADH = syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone T₄ = thyroxine TBI = traumatic brain injury TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone     

Management and Outcomes of Giant Prolactinoma: A Series of 71 Patients

Objective: To describe outcomes of patients with giant prolactinoma (≥4 cm) and identify predictors of therapeutic response.Methods: In this retrospective study, complete biochemical and structural response were defined as prolactin (PRL) ≤25 ng/mL and no visible tumor at follow-up, respectively.Results: Giant prolactinoma (median size, 4.8 cm [range, 4 to 9.8 cm]; median PRL, 5,927 ng/mL [range, 120 to 100,000 ng/mL]) was diagnosed in 71 patients. Treatments included: dopamine agonists (DAs) (n = 70, 99%), surgery (n = 30, 42%), radiation (n = 10, 14%), and somatostatin analogs (n = 2, 3%). Patients treated with DA monotherapy were older compared with those who received subsequent therapies (47 years vs. 28 years; P = .003) but had similar initial PRL and tumor size. Surgically managed patients were younger compared with the nonsurgical group (35 years vs. 46 years; P = .02) and had lower initial PRL (3,121 ng/mL vs. 6,920 ng/mL; P = .02), yet they had similar tumor response. Hypopituitarism was more common following surgery compared to medical management: adrenal insufficiency (69% vs. 27%; P<.001), hypothyroidism (67% vs. 38%; P = .02), growth hormone deficiency (24% vs. 6%; P = .04), and diabetes insipidus (17% vs. 3%; P = .04). Therapeutic response did not correlate with sex, age, initial PRL, tumor size, or first-line therapy mode. At median follow-up of 4.8 years, the median PRL was 18.3 ng/mL (range, 0.6 to 12,680 ng/mL), and final volume was 0.9 cm³ (range, 0 to 43.0 cm³). In those with available data, 36/65 (55%) patients achieved PRL normalization, and 16/61 (26%) had no visible tumor at follow-up.Conclusion: Most patients with giant prolactinoma have excellent response to DA. Sex, age, initial PRL, and tumor size do not predict therapeutic response.Abbreviations: BRC = bromocriptine; CAB = cabergoline; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; DA = dopamine agonist; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PRL = prolactin     

Disturbed prolactin responses to dopamine-related substances in patients with acromegaly and hyperprolactinemia

We undertook this study, because conflicting data were reported about the dopaminergic regulation of prolactin (PRL) secretion in patients with acromegaly and hyperprolactinemia. In order to clarify the dopaminergic regulation of PRL secretion in patients with acromegaly and hyperprolactinemia, the effects of nomifensine, a central dopamine agonist, FK 33-824, a centrally antidopaminergically acting agent, and domperidone, a peripheral dopamine antagonist, on plasma PRL in these patients were studied. The results were compared with those observed in normal subjects and hyperprolactinemic patients, with or without a pituitary tumor. Nomifensine did not lower the PRL levels and FK 33-824 did not raise the PRL levels in acromegalic patients. In hyperprolactinemic patients, nomifensine did not lower the PRL levels and FK 33-824 failed to raise the PRL levels. Domperidone did not increase PRL in about a third of acromegalic patients, while TRH increased PRL in the all normoprolactinemic acromegalic patients. These results suggest that in acromegalic patients there may be a disturbance in dopamine related neurotransmission and that such disorders also seem to be present in patients with hyperprolactinemia, with or without a pituitary tumor.     

The Effect of Raloxifene on Serum Prolactin Level in Patients with Prolactinoma

Objective: To evaluate the effect of raloxifene on prolactin (PRL) levels in addition to dopamine agonist (DA) therapy in patients with prolactinoma.Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 14 patients with prolactinoma on stable dose of DA for 6 months who received raloxifene 60 mg daily, as PRL could not be normalized despite being on fairly high doses of DA. Patients were informed that raloxifene is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for prolactinoma treatment. PRL level was measured at 1 to 6 months after starting raloxifene and at 1 to 3 months following its discontinuation. Raloxifene was stopped in 8 out of 14 patients after 2 (1 to 6) months of treatment as the absolute change in PRL level was felt to be small.Results: The median age and female/male sex ratios were 50 years (range 18 to 63 years), 6/8 respectively. The baseline DA dose was 3 mg/week (0.5 to 7 mg/week) for cabergoline and 15 mg/day for bromocriptine. Ten patients had an absolute and percentage decrease in PRL of 8.3 ng/mL (1.5 to 54.2 ng/mL) and 25.9% (8 to 55%) from baseline, respectively, after 1 to 6 months on raloxifene treatment. Among 10 patients with a decrease in PRL level, 2 (20%) achieved PRL normalization. Two patients had no change in PRL and two patients had an increase in PRL level by 22.8 ng/mL and 8.8 ng/mL (47% and 23.6%), respectively.Conclusion: Raloxifene was associated with a 25.9% (8 to 55%) decrease in PRL level in 10/14 (71%) patients with prolactinoma who were on stable doses of DA including 2 patients (14%) who achieved normoprolactinemia.Abbreviations: CV = coefficient of variation; DA = dopamine agonist; FSH = follicule-stimulating hormone; LH = luteinizing hormone; PRL = prolactin; PTTG = pituitary tumor transforming gene     

Transculturalization Recommendations For Developing Latin American Clinical Practice Algorithms In Endocrinology Proceedings Of The 2015 Pan-American Workshop By The American Association Of Clinical Endocrinologists And American College Of Endocrinology

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) convened their first Workshop for recommendations to optimize Clinical Practice Algorithm (CPA) development for Latin America (LA) in diabetes (focusing on glycemic control), obesity (focusing on weight loss), thyroid (focusing on thyroid nodule diagnostics), and bone (focusing on postmenopausal osteoporosis) on February 28, 2015, in San Jose, Costa Rica. A standardized methodology is presented incorporating various transculturalization factors: resource availability (including imaging equipment and approved pharmaceuticals), health care professional and patient preferences, lifestyle variables, socio-economic parameters, web-based global accessibility, electronic implementation, and need for validation protocols. A standardized CPA template with node-specific recommendations to assist the local transculturalization process is provided. Participants unanimously agreed on the following five overarching principles for LA: (1) there is only one level of optimal endocrine care, (2) hemoglobin A1C should be utilized at every level of diabetes care, (3) nutrition education and increased pharmaceutical options are necessary to optimize the obesity care model, (4) quality neck ultrasound must be part of an optimal thyroid nodule care model, and (5) more scientific evidence is needed on osteoporosis prevalence and cost to justify intervention by governmental health care authorities. This 2015 AACE/ACE Workshop marks the beginning of a structured activity that assists local experts in creating culturally sensitive, evidence-based, and easy-to-implement tools for optimizing endocrine care on a global scale.Abbreviations:A1C = glycated hemoglobinAACE = American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsACE = American College of EndocrinologyBG = blood glucoseBMI = body mass indexCPA = Clinical Practice AlgorithmCPG = Clinical Practice GuidelineCVD = cardiovascular diseaseDXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryEDC = endocrine-disrupting compoundFBG = fasting blood glucoseFNA = fine-needle aspirationHCP = health care professionalLA = Latin AmericaPAACE = Pan-American AACESU = sulfonylureaT2D = type 2 diabetestDNA = transcultural Diabetes Nutrition AlgorithmTSH = thyroid-stimulating hormoneWC = waist circumferenceWHO = World Health Organization     

Role of Cannulated Prolactin Test in Evaluation of Hyperprolactinemia - A Retrospective Study

Objective: While guidelines propose a single elevated prolactin measurement drawn without excess venipuncture stress as sufficient for diagnosing hyperprolactinemia, this may lead to unnecessary evaluation in the setting of stress-induced hyperprolactinemia. In this study, we aimed to define the role of the cannulated prolactin test in confirming hyperprolactinemia.Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 757 patients with unexplained hyperprolactinemia who performed a cannulated prolactin test in a community-based referral endocrine clinic between 2000–2015. The prolactin test consisted of “test-baseline” levels taken at rest (T0), and cannulated measurements at 60 and 90 minutes (T60 and T90) without repeated venipuncture. The most recent prolactin level performed prior to the test (referral-prolactin) was collected.Results: Referral-prolactin was available for 621 (82%) patients, of whom 324 (52.2%) normalized at T0. The probability of normoprolactinemia at T0 was 50% if referral-prolactin was 2.0-fold the upper-limit-of-normal (ULN), yet only 5% if referral-prolactin was 5.0-fold the ULN. Of the 359 patients with hyperprolactinemia at T0, prolactin normalized at T60 and/or T90 in 99 (27.6%) patients. The probability of normoprolactinemia was low (<5%) in those with T0 prolactin levels >2.4-fold ULN. Overall, of 757 prolactin tests performed, only 260 (34.3%) patients had persistent hyperprolactinemia.Conclusion: Patients with referral-prolactin levels >5.0-fold the ULN, or a rested-prolactin (T0) >2.4-fold the ULN are unlikely to normalize during the cannulated test and consideration should be made to proceed directly with pituitary imaging. In patients with prolactin levels below these thresholds, the cannulated prolactin test may considerably reduce unnecessary investigations, treatment, and cost.     

AACE/ACE Disease State Clinical Review: Dopamine Agonists for Hyperprolactinemia and the Risk of Cardiac Valve Disease

ObjectiveTo review the current literature regarding dopamine agonists (DAs) and the risk of the development of cardiac valve disease.MethodsPubMed searches were performed to identify all of the available published data on DAs and valve disease in patients with hyperprolactinemia.ResultsMost of the available echocardiographic data from patients treated for hyperprolactinemia are from case-control studies, and prospective data are limited. The majority of the studies do not support an increased risk of clinically significant valve disease in hyperprolactinemic patients treated with cabergoline. Evidence for the use of echocardiography is needed to limit unnecessary procedures and healthcare costs. Based on the published literature describing Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, the daily and cumulative doses of cabergoline are important factors. Considerations to minimize exposure to cabergoline, such as surgical resection of adenomas or medication withdrawal in responders, may be appropriate depending on the clinical setting.ConclusionThere is no conclusive evidence that cabergoline causes clinically significant cardiac valve disease at the usual doses for the treatment of hyperprolactinemia. Although current recommendations from regulatory agencies advise routine echocardiography for patients receiving cabergoline, evidence-based criteria would be useful both to identify patients at risk and generate appropriate screening protocols. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:608-616)     

Diagnostic value of thyrotropin releasing hormone test in 129 patients with suspected tumoral hyperprolactinemia

In 129 hyperprolactinemic (PRL > or = 100 ng/mL) and 100 normoprolactinemic patients (PRL 0-25 ng/mL), delta max. PRL (the difference between maximal prolactin (PRL) after thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) injection and basal value) was compared with basal PRL and computed tomography (CT) of the sellar region. In 122 hyperprolactinemic patients delta max. PRL was < 100%, while tumor was found in 106 of them. In the remainder seven hyperprolactinemic patients delta max. PRL was > or = 100% and CT showed no tumor. A significant difference in delta max. PRL between hyperprolactinemic patients without and those with verified adenoma was found and showed a significant negative correlation with basal PRL. Between 122 hyperprolactinemic patients with delta max. PRL < 100%, mean basal PRL and duration of clinical symptoms were significantly lower in 16 patients with normal CT compared to 106 patients with tumor. All normoprolactinemic patients showed delta max. PRL > or = 100% and no tumor on CT. PRL stimulation disturbance precedes tumor visualization and represents a decisive diagnostic parameter in hyperprolactinemic patients with no tumor signs.     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Comprehensive Clinical Practice Guidelines for Medical Care of Patients with Obesity

Objective: Development of these guidelines is mandated by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and the American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres to published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent review of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors.Results: There are 9 broad clinical questions with 123 recommendation numbers that include 160 specific statements (85 [53.1%] strong [Grade A], 48 [30.0%] intermediate [Grade B], and 11 [6.9%] weak [Grade C], with 16 [10.0%] based on expert opinion [Grade D]) that build a comprehensive medical care plan for obesity. There were 133 (83.1%) statements based on strong (best evidence level [BEL] 1 = 79 [49.4%]) or intermediate (BEL 2 = 54 [33.7%]) levels of scientific substantiation. There were 34 (23.6%) evidence-based recommendation grades (Grades A-C = 144) that were adjusted based on subjective factors. Among the 1,788 reference citations used in this CPG, 524 (29.3%) were based on strong (evidence level [EL] 1), 605 (33.8%) were based on intermediate (EL 2), and 308 (17.2%) were based on weak (EL 3) scientific studies, with 351 (19.6%) based on reviews and opinions (EL 4).Conclusion: The final recommendations recognize that obesity is a complex, adiposity-based chronic disease, where management targets both weight-related complications and adiposity to improve overall health and quality of life. The detailed evidence-based recommendations allow for nuanced clinical decision-making that addresses real-world medical care of patients with obesity, including screening, diagnosis, evaluation, selection of therapy, treatment goals, and individualization of care. The goal is to facilitate high-quality care of patients with obesity and provide a rational, scientific approach to management that optimizes health outcomes and safety.Abbreviations:A1C = hemoglobin A1cAACE = American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsACE = American College of EndocrinologyAMA = American Medical AssociationBEL = best evidence levelBMI = body mass indexCCO = Consensus Conference on ObesityCPG = clinical practice guidelineCSS = cross-sectional studyCVD = cardiovascular diseaseEL = evidence levelFDA = Food and Drug AdministrationGERD = gastroesophageal reflux diseaseHDL-c = high-density lipoprotein cholesterolIFG = impaired fasting glucoseIGT = impaired glucose toleranceLDL-c = low-density lipoprotein cholesterolMNRCT = meta-analysis of non-randomized prospective or case-controlled trialsNE = no evidencePCOS = polycystic ovary syndromeRCT = randomized controlled trialSS = surveillance studyU.S = United States     

Variations In Clinical And Imaging Findings By Time Of Diagnosis In Females With Hypopituitarism Attributed To Lymphocytic Hypophysitis

Objective: To describe the various patterns of presentation, including assisting analyses, associated with the timing of diagnosis of females with hypopituitarism and suspected clinical diagnosis of lymphocytic hypophysitis.Methods: A retrospective study of 9 consecutive females with pituitary dysfunction developed during or after pregnancy. All subjects were treated in our clinics between 2008 and 2014. Data were collected on clinical characteristics, pituitary hormone levels, and imaging findings.Results: The study group included 9 patients with a mean age 33.7 ± 7.8 years at delivery. The probable cause of disease was lymphocytic hypophysitis. Headache or specific symptoms/signs of hypopituitarism appeared within 1 year of delivery. Five patients had headache, and 8 had difficulty breastfeeding or amenorrhea. Laboratory findings included central hypocortisolism (8/9 patients), hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (8/9), and central hypothyroidism (6/7). Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels were low in 8/8 patients. Prolactin levels were low in 3/9 patients, and 1 patient had diabetes insipidus. Seven patients were diagnosed less than 1 year from symptom onset; 4 (57%) complained of headaches, and 5 (71%) had panhypopituitarism. Two patients were diagnosed later. Both had difficulty breastfeeding and amenorrhea, and one also had headaches. Both had panhypopituitarism and reduced pituitary volume. None of the patients fully recovered pituitary function. Normalization of the thyrotroph axis occurred in 3 patients, gonadotroph function in 3, the corticotroph axis in 2, and IGF-1 normalized in 1 subject.Conclusion: Hypopituitarism attributed to lymphocytic hypophysitis may present during pregnancy or early postpartum period with a clear clinical picture, or later, with indolent and nonspecific symptoms and signs.Abbreviations:ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormoneDI = diabetes insipidusFSH = follicle-stimulating hormoneGH = growth hormoneIGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1LH = luteinizing hormoneLT4 = levothyroxineMRI = magnetic resonance imagingT4 = thyroxineTSH = thyroid stimulating hormone     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Disease State Clinical Review: Update on Growth Hormone Stimulation Testing and Proposed Revised Cut-Point for the Glucagon Stimulation Test in the Diagnosis Of Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency

Objective: The clinical features of adult GH deficiency (GHD) are nonspecific, and GH stimulation testing is often required to confirm the diagnosis. However, diagnosing adult GHD can be challenging due to the episodic and pulsatile GH secretion, concurrently modified by age, gender, and body mass index (BMI).Methods: PubMed searches were conducted to identify published data since 2009 on GH stimulation tests used to diagnose adult GHD. Relevant articles in English language were identified and considered for inclusion in the present document.Results: Testing for confirmation of adult GHD should only be considered if there is a high pretest probability, and the intent to treat if the diagnosis is confirmed. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) and glucagon stimulation test (GST) are the two main tests used in the United States. While the ITT has been accepted as the gold-standard test, its safety concerns hamper wider use. Previously, the GH–releasing hormone-arginine test, and more recently the GST, are accepted alternatives to the ITT. However, several recent studies have questioned the diagnostic accuracy of the GST when the GH cut-point of 3 μg/L is used and have suggested that a lower GH cut-point of 1 μg/L improved the sensitivity and specificity of this test in overweight/obese patients and in those with glucose intolerance.Conclusion: Until a potent, safe, and reliable test becomes available, the GST should remain as the alternative to the ITT in the United States. In order to reduce over-diagnosing adult GHD in overweight/obese patients with the GST, we propose utilizing a lower GH cut-point of 1 μg/L in these subjects. However, this lower GH cut-point still needs further evaluation for diagnostic accuracy in larger patient populations with varying BMIs and degrees of glucose tolerance.Abbreviations:AACE = American Association of Clinical EndocrinologistsBMI = body mass indexGH = growth hormoneGHD = GH deficiencyGHRH = GH–releasing hormoneGHS = GH secretagogueGST = glucagon stimulation testIGF = insulin-like growth factorIGFBP-3 = IGF-binding protein 3ITT = insulin tolerance testROC = receiver operating characteristicWB-GST = weight-based GST     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Disease State Clinical Review: The Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer

Objective: (1) Describe current epidemiology of thyroid cancer in the United States; (2) evaluate hypothesized causes of the increased incidence of thyroid cancer; and (3) suggest next steps in research and clinical action.Methods: Analysis of data from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results System and the National Center for Vital Statistics. Literature review of published English-language articles through December 31, 2013.Results: The incidence of thyroid cancer has tripled over the past 30 years, whereas mortality is stable. The increase is mainly comprised of smaller tumors. These facts together suggest the major reason for the increased incidence is detection of subclinical, nonlethal disease. This has likely occurred through: health care system access, incidental detection on imaging, more frequent biopsy, greater volumes of and extent of surgery, and changes in pathology practices. Because larger-size tumors have increased in incidence also, it is possible that there is a concomitant true rise in thyroid cancer incidence. The only clearly identifiable contributor is radiation exposure, which has likely resulted in a few additional cases annually. The contribution of the following causes to the increasing incidence is unclear: iodine excess or insufficiency, diabetes and obesity, and molecular disruptions. The following mechanisms do not currently have strong evidence to support a link with the development of thyroid cancer: estrogen, dietary nitrate, and autoimmune thyroid disease.Conclusion: Research should focus on illuminating which thyroid cancers need treatment. Patients should be advised of the benefits as well as harms that can occur with treatment of incidentally identified, small, asymptomatic thyroid cancers.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index CT = computed tomography SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results     

Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis with Hyperosmolarity: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes

Objective: Studies of hyperglycemic emergencies with hyperosmolality, including hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS) and “mixed presentation” with features of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and HHS, are lacking in children. Objectives were to determine the incidence of DKA, HHS, and mixed presentation in a pediatric population, to characterize complications, and to assess accuracy of associated diagnosis codes.Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 411 hyperglycemic emergencies in pediatric patients hospitalized between 2009 and 2014. Hyperglycemic emergency type was determined by biochemical criteria and compared to the associated diagnosis code.Results: Hyperglycemic emergencies included: 333 DKA, 54 mixed presentation, and 3 HHS. Altered mental status occurred more frequently in hyperosmolar events (P<.0001), and patients with hyperosmolarity had 3.7-fold greater odds of developing complications compared to those with DKA (P =.0187). Of those with DKA, 98.5% were coded correctly. The majority (81.5%) of mixed DKA-HHS events were coded incorrectly. Events coded incorrectly had 3.1-fold greater odds of a complication (P =.02).Conclusion: A mixed DKA-HHS presentation occurred in 13.8% of characterized hyperglycemic emergencies, whereas HHS remained a rare diagnosis (0.8%) in pediatrics. Hyperosmolar events had higher rates of complications. As treatment of hyperosmolarity differs from DKA, its recognition is essential for appropriate management.Abbreviations: AMS = altered mental status; DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis; EMR = electronic medical record; HHS = hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state; ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; ISPAD = International Society of Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes; NODM = new-onset diabetes mellitus; T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Guidelines for Management of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults and Patients Transitioning from Pediatric to Adult Care

Objective: The development of these guidelines is sponsored by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG).Methods: Recommendations are based on diligent reviews of clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors, according to established AACE/ACE guidelines for guidelines protocols.Results: The Executive Summary of this 2019 updated guideline contains 58 numbered recommendations: 12 are Grade A (21%), 19 are Grade B (33%), 21 are Grade C (36%), and 6 are Grade D (10%). These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision-making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world care of patients. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for the Executive Summary recommendations. This update contains 357 citations of which 51 (14%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (strong), 168 (47%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 61 (17%) are EL 3 (weak), and 77 (22%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence).Conclusion: This CPG is a practical tool that practicing endocrinologists and regulatory bodies can refer to regarding the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of adults and patients transitioning from pediatric to adult-care services with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). It provides guidelines on assessment, screening, diagnostic testing, and treatment recommendations for a range of individuals with various causes of adult GHD. The recommendations emphasize the importance of considering testing patients with a reasonable level of clinical suspicion of GHD using appropriate growth hormone (GH) cut-points for various GH–stimulation tests to accurately diagnose adult GHD, and to exercise caution interpreting serum GH and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, as various GH and IGF-1 assays are used to support treatment decisions. The intention to treat often requires sound clinical judgment and careful assessment of the benefits and risks specific to each individual patient. Unapproved uses of GH, long-term safety, and the current status of long-acting GH preparations are also discussed in this document.LAY ABSTRACTThis updated guideline provides evidence-based recommendations regarding the identification, screening, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment for a range of individuals with various causes of adult growth-hormone deficiency (GHD) and patients with childhood-onset GHD transitioning to adult care. The update summarizes the most current knowledge about the accuracy of available GH–stimulation tests, safety of recombinant human GH (rhGH) replacement, unapproved uses of rhGH related to sports and aging, and new developments such as long-acting GH preparations that use a variety of technologies to prolong GH action. Recommendations offer a framework for physicians to manage patients with GHD effectively during transition to adult care and adulthood. Establishing a correct diagnosis is essential before consideration of replacement therapy with rhGH. Since the diagnosis of GHD in adults can be challenging, GH–stimulation tests are recommended based on individual patient circumstances and use of appropriate GH cut-points. Available GH–stimulation tests are discussed regarding variability, accuracy, reproducibility, safety, and contraindications, among other factors. The regimen for starting and maintaining rhGH treatment now uses individualized dose adjustments, which has improved effectiveness and reduced reported side effects, dependent on age, gender, body mass index, and various other individual characteristics. With careful dosing of rhGH replacement, many features of adult GHD are reversible and side effects of therapy can be minimized. Scientific studies have consistently shown rhGH therapy to be beneficial for adults with GHD, including improvements in body composition and quality of life, and have demonstrated the safety of short- and long-term rhGH replacement.Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; AHSG = alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein; AO-GHD = adult-onset growth hormone deficiency; ARG = arginine; BEL = best evidence level; BMD = bone mineral density; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; CO-GHD = childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency; CPG = clinical practice guideline; CRP = C-reactive protein; DM = diabetes mellitus; DXA = dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; EL = evidence level; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; FD-GST = fixed-dose glucagon stimulation test; GeNeSIS = Genetics and Neuroendocrinology of Short Stature International Study; GH = growth hormone; GHD = growth hormone deficiency; GHRH = growth hormone–releasing hormone; GST = glucagon stimulation test; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; HypoCCS = Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IGFBP = insulin-like growth factor–binding protein; IGHD = isolated growth hormone deficiency; ITT = insulin tolerance test; KIMS = Kabi International Metabolic Surveillance; LAGH = long-acting growth hormone; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LIF = leukemia inhibitory factor; MPHD = multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; P-III-NP = procollagen type-III amino-terminal pro-peptide; PHD = pituitary hormone deficiencies; QoL = quality of life; rhGH = recombinant human growth hormone; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; RR = relative risk; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; SDS = standard deviation score; SIR = standardized incidence ratio; SN = secondary neoplasms; T3 = triiodothyronine; TBI = traumatic brain injury; VDBP = vitamin D-binding protein; WADA = World Anti-Doping Agency; WB-GST = weight-based glucagon stimulation test     

Functional evaluation of the adenohypophysis with metoclopramide in hyperprolactinemic-amenorrheic women in relation to radiological findings on the sella turcica

The responses of the adenohypophyseal hormones to metoclopramide (MCP) were evaluated in hyperprolactinemic women with various radiological findings on the sella turcica. Serum PRL concentrations significantly increased after MCP administration in normal women, hyperprolactinemic patients with normal sella and patients with microadenoma, but not in macroadenoma patients with and without suprasellar expansion (SSE). The PRL response to MCP administration was significantly lower in hyperprolactinemic patients than in normal women. Serum TSH concentrations significantly increased after MCP administration in each group of subjects. The TSH response to MCP was significantly higher in patients with normal sella and patients with microadenoma than in normal women. However, the responses of PRL and TSH to MCP were not significantly different between patients with normal sella and patients with microadenoma. Therefore, they were not considered useful in distinguishing tumorous from nontumorous hyperprolactinemia. Serum LH concentrations significantly increased after MCP administration in patients with normal sella, patients with microadenoma and macroadenoma patients without SSE, but not in normal women or macroadenoma patients with SSE. The LH response to MCP was significantly higher in patients with microadenoma than in patients with normal sella. Serum FSH concentrations significantly increased after MCP administration only in patients with microadenoma. The different responses of the adenohypophyseal hormones to MCP in hyperprolactinemic women with various radiological findings on the sella turcica may be explained by the difference in the hypothalamic dopamine activity and in the impairment of the hypothalamic-pituitary system due to pituitary tumor.