Prediction of Nondiagnostic Results in Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: utility of On-Site Gross Visual Assessment of Specimens for Liquid-Based Cytology

Objective: To explore a comprehensive approach for on-site gross visual assessments of liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens of thyroid nodules and determine morphologic criteria that help predict nondiagnostic rates.Methods: Two-hundred nodules from 165 patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) at our hospital were included in this prospectively designed, retrospective analysis. Specimens were visually assessed on-site for three morphologic categories (specimen color, specimen volume, and particle count) using a 5-point grading.Results: Twenty-two nodules (11%) showed nondiagnostic results. Regarding specimen color, nondiagnostic rates tended to be higher in grades 1 (75%) and 5 (100%) than in grades 2 (18%), 3 (8%), or 4 (17%), with a significant difference between grade 1 and grade 3 (P = .003). For specimen volume, nondiagnostic results were significantly more common in grade 1 (33%) and 5 (33%) than in grades 3 (5%) or 4 (1%) (P<.005). There was a significant negative correlation between the grading of the particle count and the nondiagnostic rate (Spearman ρ = -1.000; P<.001). The sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of nondiagnostic results were 77% and 76%, respectively, at the optimal cutoff value of 2 (grade 2 or lower).Conclusion: Particle count was an important morphologic criterion that helped predict nondiagnostic rates in LBC specimens of thyroid nodules, and the specimen color and volume were also useful adjuncts. In routine practice, on-site gross visual assessment followed by resampling (if necessary) may potentially help reduce the rates of nondiagnostic results, repeat FNAs, and the number of unnecessary needle passes.Abbreviations: FNA = fine-needle aspiration; LBC = liquid-based cytology; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; US = ultrasonography     

The Role of Core-Needle Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules with Initially Nondiagnostic Fine-Needle Aspiration Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: This study evaluated the prevalence of nondiagnostic results, diagnostic performance, and complications of core-needle biopsy (CNB) compared with repeat fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for thyroid nodules with previous nondiagnostic FNA findings.Methods: The Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were thoroughly searched for studies evaluating CNB or repeat FNA for thyroid nodules with initially nondiagnostic FNA results. Pooled proportions of nondiagnostic results of CNB and repeat FNA were calculated. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CNB and repeat FNA for a diagnosis of malignancy using a bivariate random-effects model. Complication rates were also evaluated.Results: A review of 52 articles identified 4 eligible articles, involving 1,028 patients with 1,028 thyroid nodules, which were included in the meta-analysis. CNB demonstrated significantly lower rates of nondiagnostic results (6.4%) than repeat FNA (36.5%) (P<.0001). In the 3 studies that analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of CNB in diagnosing malignancy, CNB demonstrated significantly higher summary estimates of sensitivity (89.8%) than repeat FNA (60.6%) (P = .022), but summary specificity did not differ between CNB (99.2%) and repeat FNA (99.0%) (P = .576). None of the patients who underwent CNB or repeat FNA experienced any major complications.Conclusion: CNB demonstrates lower rates of nondiagnostic results and higher diagnostic accuracy than repeat FNA. CNB, rather than repeat FNA, can be utilized to diagnose thyroid nodules previously nondiagnostic on FNA.Abbreviations:CI = confidence intervalCNB = core-needle biopsyFNA = fine-needle aspirationSROC = summary receiver operating characteristicUS = ultrasound     

Thyroid Nodules with 2 Prior Inadequate Fine-Needle Aspiration Results: Effect of Increasing the Diameter of the Needle

Objective: The major limitation of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) procedures of thyroid nodules are the cytologically nondiagnostic results. The role of increasing the diameter of the needle in the third FNAB (FNAB#3) due to inadequate cytology has as yet not been investigated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether increasing the needle diameter could improve the cytologic sampling of thyroid nodules following 2 previous nondiagnostic US-FNAB results.Methods: Between July 2012 and December 2012, 140 consecutive patients with 2 prior nondiagnostic US-FNAB results were enrolled in this prospective investigation. Group 22G consisted of 70 patients (78.5% women; mean age, 52 years) having nodules examined with a 22-gauge (G) needle. Group 27G consisted of 70 patients (75.7% women; mean age, 53 years) having nodules examined with a 27-G needle.Results: The rate of nondiagnostic FNAB results was 42.8% (30 of 70) in group 22G and 64.3% (45 of 70) in group 27G, which was a significant difference (P = .011). The large-bore (22 G) needle was found to be statistically significantly superior compared with the small-bore (27 G) needle in diagnostic ability for predominantly solid (P = .014), irregular (P = .013), and halo-free (P = .021) nodules. The accuracy rate was 64.6 and 38% for large-bore (22 G) and small-bore (27 G) needles, respectively.Conclusion: The results of our study showed that increasing the needle lumen diameter significantly improves diagnostic performance in terms of adequate aspirated material and diagnostic accuracy rate following 2 prior nondiagnostic US-FNABs.Abbreviations: AUS = atypia of undetermined significance FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy G = gauge NPV = negative predictive value PPV = positive predictive value US = ultrasound     

Utility of Ultrasound Versus Gene Expression Classifier in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance

Objective: Thyroid nodules with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology categorized as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) often undergo additional diagnostic analysis with the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC), which classifies these as either high probability of being benign (GEC-B) or suspicious for malignancy (GEC-S). Our goal was to assess the clinical validity and utility of GEC in the evaluation of AUS cytology and evaluate the performance of ultrasonography (USG) for predicting malignancy in this subset.Methods: We conducted a study with a retrospective cohort of patients from January 2012 to January 2014 who had FNA of thyroid nodules >1 cm in size with AUS cytology.Results: Cleveland Clinic Florida has an overall prevalence of AUS of 5%. A total of 119 cases with nodules >1 cm in size were reported as AUS. Forty-eight (40.3%) had a GEC performed after the first FNA (AUS-1), and 27 of these were GEC-S. Of those 27, 21 went for surgery and 14 (66.6%) had thyroid cancer on histopathology. The remaining 71 with AUS-1 were sent for a second FNA: 19 nodules were benign and did not undergo further evaluation, while the remaining 52 were reported as AUS for the second consecutive time (AUS-2). AUS-2 samples were sent for GEC. Of these 52 AUS-2, 38 (73.1%) were reported as GEC-S. Thirty-five went for surgery and 32 (91.4%) had confirmed malignancy on histopathology. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 91.4% for AUS-2 and 66.6% for AUS-1. Moreover, AUS-2 nodules that were hypoechoic and solid on USG showed a PPV of 92% for malignancy.Conclusion: In our practice, the diagnostic accuracy to predict malignancy with GEC for AUS-1 nodules was poor (PPV, 66.6%). The PPV of GEC testing was markedly higher at 91.4% performed after two consecutive AUS cytologies. AUS-2 nodules that were solid and hypoechoic on USG also had a high probability to be malignant (PPV, 92%). We recommend repeat FNA on AUS-1 nodules rather than proceeding directly to GEC testing. Also, we suggest that among AUS-2 nodules, surgery can be recommended when USG shows solid and hypoechoic features with GEC testing reserved for the remainder.Abbreviations:AUS = atypia of undetermined significanceFNA = fine-needle aspirationGEC = gene expression classifierGEC-B = GEC-benignGEC-S = GEC-suspicious for malignancyNPV = negative predictive valuePPV = positive predictive valueUSG = ultrasonography     

Do all Thyroid Nodules >4 cm need to be Removed? An Evaluation of Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Large Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Controversy exists regarding the ability of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy to rule out malignancy when thyroid nodules exceed 4 cm in diameter. The goal of this study was to provide data regarding FNA accuracy in a clinical setting for detecting/ruling out malignancy in large thyroid nodules (≥4 cm) and discuss FNA utility in guiding surgical decisions.Methods: All thyroid FNA cases performed at Marshfield Clinic from 1/1/2000 to 12/31/2010 followed by complete or partial thyroidectomy on nodules of at least 4 cm were identified. Demographics, medical history, nodule biopsy characteristics, surgical procedures, and diagnosis data were abstracted. FNA was compared to histologic evaluation of surgical specimens.Results: A total of 198 patients with large thyroid nodules were identified. Most had a single large nodule, but ~40% were multinodular, and 206 total nodules were assessed. Females outnumbered males, and the mean age was ~50 years. After surgery, cancer was histologically identified in 49/206 (23.8%) nodules, including 9/123 nodules that had been categorized as benign by FNA, corresponding to a false-negative rate of 7.3%. Sensitivity/specificity for detecting malignancy by FNA was ~80%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was just below 60%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 93% but rose to 96% when papillary microcarcinomas were excluded.Conclusion: While FNA sensitivity in large nodules was relatively low, NPV was high, especially if incidental papillary microcarcinomas were excluded. When cancer prevalence and NPV are known, FNA can be a reliable “rule out” test in nodules ≥4 cm. This information is critical and can help guide the surgery decision, especially in high-risk patients. The decision for surgery should not be solely based on nodule size but should consider additional factors including cancer prevalence, clinical history, ultrasound features, surgical risk, and life expectancy.Abbreviations:FNA = fine-needle aspirationNPV = negative predictive valuePPV = positive predictive value     

Utility of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier for Evaluation of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules and Correlation with Ultrasound Risk Assessment: Single Institutional Experience

Objective: We assessed our experience with Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) combined with sono-graphic risk assessment, using both the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) in evaluating indeterminate thyroid nodules.Methods: We identified 98 patients with 101 nodules who had a second fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017, and sent to Veracyte for cytopathology and subsequent Afirma GEC testing. A second FNA biopsy was performed if the initial cytopathology was either Bethesda III or IV (n = 94) or nondiagnostic (n = 7). We correlated cytopathology, histopathology, and Afirma GEC results with sonographic risk assessment using both the ATA system and TI-RADS.Results: The mean age of the cohort was 57.4 ± 12.3 years; 84% women and 60% white. Repeat FNA was benign in 51 of 101 nodules, and of the remaining 50 nodules, 18 (36%) were GEC-benign and 32 (64%) GEC-suspicious. Eighteen of the 32 GEC-suspicious nodules underwent surgery with the following results: 7 benign (39%), 1 follicular thyroid carcinoma (6%), 6 follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer (33%), and 4 noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features (22%). The malignancy rate among the surgical cohort was 39% (without noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features [NIFTP]) and 61% (with NIFTP) and about 50% and 20% of this group scored in the high suspicion category by ATA and TR5 by TI-RADS, respectively.Conclusion: Afirma GEC was useful in avoiding surgery in one-third of indeterminate nodules and performed similarly to ATA and TI-RADS. However, the use of echogenicity in scoring may underestimate the risk of malignancy in patients with indeterminate nodules.Abbreviations:ATA = American Thyroid Association; AUS = Atypia of Undetermined Significance; FLUS = Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; FNA = fine needle aspiration; FTC = follicular thyroid cancer; FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer; GEC = Gene Expression Classifier; ND = nondiagnostic; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; TR = TI-RADS     

Same-Day Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Diagnosis for Thyroid Nodules Achieves Rapid Anxiety Decrease and High Diagnostic Accuracy

Objective: The time between the moment of referral for the diagnostic workup for thyroid nodules and the outcome can be worrisome for patients. In general, patients experience high levels of anxiety during the evaluation of a lesion suspicious for cancer. Therefore, the implementation of same-day fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) diagnosis is becoming standard-of-care for many solid tumors. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of same-day FNAC diagnosis for thyroid nodules and to assess patient anxiety during the diagnostic process.Methods: For feasibility of same-day FNAC diagnosis, we assessed the proportion of patients receiving a diagnosis at the end of the visit. Accuracy was measured by comparing histology with the FNAC result. Patient anxiety was measured by the State Trait Anxiety Inventory at 6 moments during the diagnostic workup.Results: Of the 131 included patients, 112 (86%) were female, and the mean age was 53 years. All patients, except those with a nondiagnostic FNAC result (n = 26; 20%), had a diagnosis at the end of the day. There were only two discordant results. Anxiety levels at the beginning of the day were high throughout the group, State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) score 43.1 (SD 2.0) and decreased significantly more in patients with a benign FNAC result (STAI score 30.2), compared to patients with a malignant or indeterminate result (STAI score 39.6).Conclusion: Distress of patients with a thyroid nodule undergoing same-day FNAC diagnostics was high. Same-day FNAC diagnosis is feasible and accurate for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Therefore, same-day FNAC diagnosis seems a safer, more patient-friendly approach to diagnose thyroid nodules.Abbreviations:AUS = atypia of undetermined significanceCWS = Cancer Worry ScaleFNAC = fine-needle aspiration cytologySTAI = State Trait Anxiety InventoryTSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone     

Thyroid Cytology and Risk of Thyroid Cancer: Differences Among Indeterminate Specimens

ObjectiveTo assess the potential for stratification of indeterminate cytologic findings on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules in an effort to improve therapeutic strategies.MethodsWe attempted to determine the malignant risk associated with various indeterminate FNA cytologic patterns by correlation of specimens with the final histologic diagnosis. For this analysis, we identified 294 computerized medical records of surgically treated thyroid nodules during a 5-year period at our institution with the corresponding FNA cytology reports available.ResultsOf the 294 surgical cases, 162 with a positive or indeterminate cytologic report were selected, reviewed, and classified. Of 52 patients with positive cytologic findings on FNA, 51 (98%) had a final histologic report of a malignant thyroid nodule. Of 110 patients with indeterminate specimens, 30 (27%) had a final histologic diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma. The presence of nuclear atypia was predictive of thyroid carcinoma in 75% of patients, a Hürthle cell cytologic pattern was associated with a malignant thyroid nodule in 33%, and a hypercellular smear was suggestive of malignant involvement in 26% of cases. The lowest rate of malignant potential was associated with cytologic microfollicular and scant colloid alone subtype (6%).ConclusionThe results of this study show that indeterminate thyroid cytologic specimens can be subdivided into groups with different malignant risks. A microfollicular cytologic pattern in the absence of a hypercellular smear or nuclear atypia does not support a recommendation of surgical treatment. A malignant cytologic diagnosis has a high positive predictive value for detection of thyroid cancer. (Endocr Pract. 2004;10:330-334)     

Guideline Implementation on Fine-Needle Aspiration for Thyroid Nodules: Focusing on Micronodules

Objective: We investigated patients who were referred to our institution after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed at outside clinics to evaluate how many nodules satisfied the FNA indications of the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and compare that to the number of thyroid nodules that satisfy the FNA indications of the American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2018, 2,628 patients were included in our study. The included patients were those referred for thyroid surgery after having a suspicious thyroid nodule. We retrospectively applied the three guidelines to each thyroid nodule and determined whether each nodule satisfied the FNA indications. We compared the proportion of nodules satisfying the FNA indications of each guideline using a generalized linear model and generalized estimating equation.Results: The median size of the 2,628 thyroid nodules was 0.9 cm (range, 0.2 to 9.5 cm). We found that FNA was not indicated for 54.1%, 47.7%, and 19.1% of nodules and 87.3%, 99.0%, and 97.8% among them were micronodules (<1 cm) according to the ACR-TIRADS, ATA guideline, and K-TIRADS, respectively. The proportion of micronodules which satisfied the FNA indications was significantly higher for the K-TIRADS (65.1%) compared to the ACR TIRADS (12.1%) and ATA guideline (12.1%) (P<.001).Conclusion: Among patients referred for thyroid surgery to our institutions, about 35% of the micronodules underwent FNA despite not being appropriate for indications by the K-TIRADS. Systematic training for physicians as well as modifications to increase the sensitivity of the guideline may be needed to reduce the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancers, especially for micronodules.     

ProGRP as a Novel Biomarker for the Differential Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma in Patients with Thyroid Nodules

Objective: To investigate the release of progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) in patients with thyroid nodules and the value of ProGRP in fine-needle aspirate washout fluid (FNA-ProGRP) in the differential diagnosis between medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and non-MTC thyroid nodules.Methods: We investigated 2,446 healthy persons and 212 patients with 235 thyroid nodules. They were classified into healthy, nodular goiter, chronic thyroiditis, thyroid follicular neoplasm, papillary thyroid carcinoma, follicular thyroid carcinoma, and medullary thyroid carcinoma. The serum ProGRP and FNA-ProGRP were measured.Results: The serum ProGRP median concentration in MTC was 124.40 pg/mL, significantly higher than in other groups. The cutoff value of serum ProGRP was 68.30 pg/mL, leading to 53.85% sensitivity, 96.98% specificity, and 0.51 kappa value in MTC. The FNA-ProGRP median concentration in MTC nodules was 2,096.00 pg/mL, significantly higher than in other groups. A receiver operating characteristic analysis of MTC nodules and non-MTC nodules indicated that the cutoff value was 22.77 pg/mL, leading to 94.12% sensitivity, 98.27% specificity, and 0.85 kappa value.Conclusion: FNA-ProGRP measurement could be served as an ancillary method for the differential diagnosis between MTC and non-MTC thyroid nodules.Abbreviations: CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen; CT = calcitonin; FNAC = fine-needle aspiration cytology; FNA-CT = calcitonin in fine-needle aspirate washout fluid; FNA-ProGRP = ProGRP in fine-needle aspirate washout fluid; MTC = medullary thyroid carcinoma; ProGRP = progastrin-releasing peptide; SCLC = small-cell lung cancer; TM = tumor marker     

Implementing Key Changes in The American Thyroid Association 2015 Thyroid Nodules/Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Guidelines Across Practice Types

Objective: This article provides suggestions to help clinicians implement important changes in the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (“ATA 2015”) across diverse settings.Methods: Key ATA 2015 changes are summarized regarding: (1) thyroid nodule management; (2) lobectomy versus thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC); and (3) surveillance following primary treatment of DTC. Advice to facilitate implementation is based on clinical experience and selected literature.Results: Strategies are described to enhance acquisition of high-quality information that helps identify patients who may possibly avoid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules or total thyroidectomy for DTC, or undergo less intense postoperative surveillance. Sonographic imaging of nodules may improve if sonograms are obtained by clinicians ordering or performing FNA or trusted high-volume sonographers. Cytopathologic assessment and reporting can be improved by working with regional or national experts. Pre-operative evaluation by endocrinologists is important so that patients are referred to experienced, proficient surgeons and assisted with well-informed decision-making regarding surgical radicality. Endocrinologists and surgeons should ensure performance of pre-operative neck ultrasonography, voice/laryngeal evaluation, and contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging when appropriate. Findings should be disseminated to all healthcare team members, ideally through a comprehensive medical record accessible to the entire team.Conclusion: Optimization of the sequence of specialist visits and assembly of interactive multidisciplinary teams coupled with intensified interdisciplinary and patient communication may enable clinicians to more effectively implement ATA 2015, which calls for more individualized, and often, less “invasive” management of thyroid nodules and DTC.Abbreviations: ATA 2009 = 2009 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma; ATA 2015 = 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma; DTC = differentiated thyroid carcinoma; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; PET/CT = positron emission tomography/computed tomography     

Statistical Comparison of Afirma Gsc and Afirma Gec Outcomes in a Community Endocrine Surgical Practice: Early Findings

Objective: The Veracyte Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) has been the most widely used negative predictive value molecular classifier for indeterminate cytology thyroid nodules since January 2011. To improve the specificity and further reduce unnecessary thyroid surgeries, a second-generation assay (Afirma Genetic Sequence Classifier &lsqb;GSC]) was released for clinical use in August 2017. We report 11 months of clinical outcomes experience with the GSC and compare them to our 6.5-year experience with the GEC.Methods: We searched our practice registry for FNAB nodules with Afirma results from January 2011through June 2018. GEC versus GSC results were compared overall, in oncocytic and nononcocytic aspirates and by pathologic outcomes.Results: GSC identified less indeterminate cytology nodules as suspicious (38.8%; 54/139) when compared to GEC (58.4%; 281/481). There was a decrease of in the percentage of oncocytic fine-needle aspiration thyroid biopsy (FNAB) subjects classified as suspicious in the GSC group, with 86 of 104 oncocytic indeterminates (82.7%) classified as suspicious by GEC and 12 of 34 (35.3%) classified as suspicious by GSC. The surgery rate in patients with oncocytic aspirates fell from 56% in the GEC group to 31% in the GSC-evaluated group (45%). Pathology analysis demonstrated a false-negative percentage for an incomplete surgical group of 9.5% for GEC and 1.2% for GSC.Conclusion: Our GSC data suggest that the GSC further reduces surgery in indeterminate thyroid nodules by improving the specificity of Afirma technology without compromising sensitivity. A primary determinant for this change is a significant improvement in the specificity of the Afirma GSC test in oncocytic FNAB aspirates.Abbreviations: FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; GEC = Gene Expression Classifier; GSC = Genetic Sequence Classifier     

Maximal Stiffness Evaluation by Real-Time Ultrasound Elastography,an Improved Tool for the Differential Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a new ultrasound elastography (USE) parameter based on the measurement of the percentage of maximal stiffness within a nodule as compared with the already established elastographic strain index (SI) and to investigate their diagnostic performance according to nodule size.Methods: The study included 218 nodules. Each nodule underwent conventional ultrasound (US), USE evaluation, and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Thyroid nodules were further stratified into 4 subgroups (G) according to their size (G1, <1 cm; G2, 1–2 cm; G3, >3 cm). USE evaluation comprised the measurement of the percentage of the areas included in the region of interest corresponding to the maximal stiffness (% Index) and of the SI.Results: The % Index and of the SI were significantly higher in malignant than in benign thyroid nodules, and both measurements displayed a good diagnostic performance (SI sensitivity and specificity, 0.66 and 0.90, respectively; % Index sensitivity and specificity, 0.76 and 0.89, respectively). Compared with SI, the % Index was more informative, both in the whole group of thyroid nodules (odds ratio [OR], 18.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.06 to 63.49; P<.0001 versus OR, 26.15; 95% CI, 8.01 to 102.87; P<.0001, respectively) and in the G1 and G2 subgroups.Conclusion: The % Index is a stronger predictor of nodule malignancy than both the SI and the conventional US signs. This is particularly true in nodules smaller than 1 cm, which are more difficult to explore both by conventional US and FNAC.Abbreviations: FNAC = fine-needle aspiration cytology % Index = percentage of maximal stiffness within the nodule MCC = Matthew's correlation coefficient OR = odds ratio RTE = real-time elastography SI = strain index US = ultrasound USE = ultrasound elastography     

Value of Repeating A Nondiagnostic Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy

ObjectiveTo assess the value of repeating a biopsy when the initial thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is nondiagnostic.MethodsBetween 1990 and 2003, 4,311 thyroid FNAs were performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, of which 220 (5%) were nondiagnostic. Among 189 patients whose medical records were available for retrospective review, 106 underwent a repeated FNA (FNA #2), and 14 had a second repeated FNA (FNA #3). Thyroid ultrasonography was used in the evaluation in 113 FNAs.ResultsThe first and second repeated FNAs were diagnostic in 58% (62 of 106 patients) and 50% (7 of 14 patients), respectively. The rate of malignant disease in patients with no repeated FNAs versus 1 or more repeated FNAs was 4.8% (4 of 83) versus 11.3% (12 of 106), respectively. Ultrasound-guided FNA yielded a diagnosis among 33 of 113 biopsies (29.2%), and FNA without ultrasound guidance provided a diagnosis in 30 of 159 biopsies (18.9%). Thus, the use of thyroid ultrasonography significantly improved the likelihood of establishing a diagnosis (P = 0.017). We found that repeating the FNA up to 2 times provides a diagnosis in up to 60% of cases.ConclusionThe overall prevalence of thyroid cancer in patients with nondiagnostic FNA is not trivial—8.5% in our study group of 189 patients. An aggressive approach toward nondiagnostic FNA biopsies is recommended, with performance of at least 2 repeated FNA biopsies, preferably with the help of ultrasound guidance. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:735-742)     

Assay of Free Thyroxine and Free Triiodothyronine in Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: a Useful and Low-Cost Assessment

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether analysis of thyroid hormones in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules can provide information about the functional status and the nature of the nodules.MethodsWe studied 4 groups of patients: group 1, 17 patients with autonomous hyperfunctioning thyroid nodules; group 2, 52 patients with cold nonfunctioning thyroid nodules; group 3, 12 patients with malignant thyroid nodules; and group 4 (control group), 10 patients with nonthyroid nodular lesions (enlarged parathyroid glands or lymph nodes). The assay of thyroid hormones was performed in FNA after the washing of needles and, with patient consent, also in normal thyroid parenchyma.ResultsThe free thyroxine (FT₄) and free triiodothyronine (FT₃) values were remarkably high in group 1 (mean, 5.5 ± 0.53 ng/dL and 27.6 ± 3.1 pg/mL, respectively; P < 0.05 versus group 2 and group 4, the control group). The levels of FT₄ and FT₃ were very low in group 3 (< 0.2 ng/dL and < 1.0 pg/mL, respectively; P < 0.05 versus group 2). Thyroglobulin values in FNA specimens were much higher than the normal range in human serum, but no significant differences were found between the various groups. The control group had low levels of FT₄ and FT₃ (< 0.2 ng/dL and < 1.0 pg/mL, respectively) in conjunction with low levels of thyroglobulin, whereas parathyroid hormone levels were high in parathyroid nodules.ConclusionThese results show that assay of FT₄ and FT₃ in FNA can yield information about the functional status of thyroid nodules and, indirectly, about the nature of nodules. In this era of sophisticated new molecular markers in FNA cytology, this low-cost diagnostic method can be readily performed in every laboratory. (Endocr Pract. 2004;10:311-316)     

Feasibility of Immediate Assessment of Fine Needle Aspirates of Thyroid Nodules by Telecytopathology

ObjectiveIn this study we discuss the diagnostic accuracy and unsatisfactory rate of onsite evaluation of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (USGFNA) of thyroid nodules using telecytopathology and compare it to that of a control group without telecytopathology.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of USGFNA of thyroid nodules over a 9-month period with and without telecytopathology. There was no randomization for selection of the groups with and without telepathologist. A single provider performed all the procedures. Real-time images of Diff Quik-stained cytology smears were obtained with an Olympus Digital camera attached to an Olympus CX41 microscope and transmitted via the Internet by a cytotechnologist to a pathologist, who communicated the preliminary diagnosis and sample adequacy. The unsatisfactory specimen rate was compared between a group whose images were transmitted (n = 45) and another group without onsite adequacy assessment (nontransmitted) (n = 47).ResultsA total of 92 nodules in 67 patients were aspirated with ultrasound guidance. The unsatisfactory sample rate in the transmitted group was 13% (6 out of 45) and that of the non-transmitted group was 23% (11 out of 47). In the transmitted group, the cytology specimens of 3 patients that were initially deemed inadequate by the pathologist were considered adequate after 2 additional passes. In the transmitted group, preliminary diagnosis concurred with the final diagnosis in 96% of cases. Four passes were made in the non-transmitted group, versus 2 passes in the transmitted group.ConclusionImmediate assessment of USGFNA via telecytopathology assures adequacy of the cytology sample and may reduce number of passes per nodule. Preliminary onsite telecytopathology diagnosis was highly accurate when compared to final diagnosis. (Endocr Pract. 2013; 19:14-18)     

Thyroid FNAC cytology: can we do it better?

This article reviews recent developments in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). While thyroid nodules are common, carcinoma is comparatively rare. Although histological assessment is used in most studies as the benchmark, the differential diagnosis on cytology or histology is not always reproducible. The literature shows wide variations in criteria for inadequate thyroid FNAC and study inclusion or exclusion criteria. In-clinic assessment of specimen adequacy and in-clinic reporting of thyroid FNAC has become popular although the costs and resource implications of in-clinic thyroid FNAC assessment and reporting are substantial. Many centres continue to use conventional techniques although liquid-based cytology and ultrasound-guided FNAC are gaining in popularity. Standardized categorical systems for FNAC reporting can make results easier to understand for clinicians and give clear indications for therapeutic action. Multidisciplinary case review is also essential, especially when there is diagnostic uncertainty. While currently of limited use, molecular pathology testing holds out some promise for the future.     

Thyroid Nodule Location on Ultrasonography as a Predictor of Malignancy

Objective: The diagnostic capacity of ultrasonography (US) for differentiating between malignant and benign thyroid nodules is crucial in preventing unnecessary invasive procedures. This is the first study to evaluate whether thyroid nodule location on US has predictive value for malignancy.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 219 patients with thyroid nodules who underwent fine-needle aspiration biopsy in 1 year. Patients' demographics as well as nodule's laterality, polarity, morphology, and multinodularity were analyzed. All malignant lesions were confirmed by surgical pathology.Results: The majority of the patients were female (86.2%). Nodules were evenly distributed between the right lobe (46.3%) and left lobe (49.5%). Eight nodules (4.2%) were located in the isthmus. Most nodules (79.3%) were located in the lower pole, while 9.6% were located in the upper pole and 6.9% in the middle pole. Seventy-five patients (39.9%) had multiple nodules. Fourteen nodules were malignant, representing a prevalence of 7.4%. A significantly higher frequency of malignancy was observed in upper pole (22.2%) compared to lower pole (4.7%) and middle pole (15.4%). A multiple logistic regression model confirmed such association after adjusting for age, body mass index, multinodularity, and laterality. The odds of malignancy in the upper pole were 4 times higher than other locations (odds ratio, 4.6; P = .03).Conclusion: Our study is the first showing that thyroid nodules located in the upper pole can be considered as having higher risk for malignancy. It may enhance the predictive value of malignancy if it is included in thyroid nodule ultrasound classification guidelines.Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ATA = American Thyroid Association; BMI = body mass index; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; TMS = total malignancy score; TTW = taller than wide; US = ultrasonography     

Incidental Thyroid Nodules: Race/Ethnicity Disparities and Outcomes

Objective: Black patients have a significantly lower incidence of well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) compared to all other race/ethnic groups, while white patients appear to be at greater risk. This study examines incidental thyroid nodules (ITNs) to assess whether racial disparities in WDTC arise from a differential discovery of ITNs—perhaps due to socioeconomic disparities—or reflect true differences in thyroid cancer rates.Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules by our academic medical center's endocrinology division between January 2006 and December 2010. Medical records were reviewed to identify whether the biopsied thyroid nodule was discovered incidentally through nonthyroid-related imaging or identified by palpation.Results: FNAs were performed on 1,369 total thyroid nodules in 1,141 study patients; 547 (48%) were classified as white, and 593 (52%) were classified as nonwhite. Among this cohort, 36.6% of patients underwent biopsy for an ITN. White patients were 1.6 times more likely to have undergone a biopsy for a nodule that was incidentally identified compared to nonwhites (P<.0001). Indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) did not have a significant association with ITNs. Within the ITN cohort, 4.9% of nonwhite patients were found to have a thyroid malignancy compared to 12.9% of white patients (P<.01).Conclusion: The higher incidence of thyroid cancer in white patients appears to be not only due to diagnostic bias, but also to a true difference in cancer prevalence.Abbreviations: FNA = fine-needle aspiration; ITN = incidental thyroid nodule; SEER = Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results; SES = socioeconomic status; WDTC = well-differentiated thyroid cancer     

Thyroseq®V2.0 Molecular Testing: A Cost-Effective Approach for the Evaluation of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Approximately 15 to 30% of thyroid nodules have indeterminate cytology. Many of these nodules are treated surgically, but only 5 to 30% are malignant. Molecular testing can further narrow the risk of malignancy of these nodules. Our objective was to assess the cost effectiveness of ThyroSeq®V2.0 compared to diagnostic thyroidectomy for the evaluation of indeterminate nodules.Methods: Cytology and histopathology slides of Bethesda category III and IV (suspicious for follicular neoplasia [SFN]) nodules obtained between January 1, 2014 and November 30, 2016 were re-reviewed by 2 endocrine cytopathologists. Costs for a diagnostic approach using ThyroSeq® were calculated and compared to those of diagnostic thyroidectomy.Results: We included 8 Bethesda category III nodules that underwent ThyroSeq® and 8 that underwent diagnostic surgery. Of those submitted for ThyroSeq®, 4 were positive for mutations and underwent thyroid surgery. The average cost per nodule evaluated was $14,669 using ThyroSeq®, compared to $23,338 for diagnostic thyroid surgery. The cost per thyroid cancer case detected was $58,674 using ThyroSeq® compared to $62,233 for diagnostic thyroid surgery. We included 13 nodules Bethesda category IV that underwent ThyroSeq® and 11 that underwent diagnostic surgery. Of those submitted for ThyroSeq®, 6 were positive for mutation and underwent thyroid surgery. The average costs per nodule evaluated were $14,641 using ThyroSeq® and $24,345 using diagnostic thyroidectomy. The cost per thyroid cancer case detected was $31,721 when using ThyroSeq® compared to $53,560 for diagnostic thyroidectomy.Conclusion: The use of ThyroSeq® in our institution is cost effective compared to diagnostic thyroid surgery for the evaluation of Bethesda categories III and IV (SFN) nodules.Abbreviations: FNA = fine-needle aspiration; GEC = gene expression classifier; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; PTC = papillary thyroid cancer; SFN = suspicious for follicular neoplasia