Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

Relationship of the Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group E DNA Repair Defect to the Chromatin and DNA Binding Proteins UV-DDB and Replication Protein A

Cells from complementation groups A through G of the heritable sun-sensitive disorder xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) show defects in nucleotide excision repair of damaged DNA. Proteins representing groups A, B, C, D, F, and G are subunits of the core recognition and incision machinery of repair. XP group E (XP-E) is the mildest form of the disorder, and cells generally show about 50% of the normal repair level. We investigated two protein factors previously implicated in the XP-E defect, UV-damaged DNA binding protein (UV-DDB) and replication protein A (RPA). Three newly identified XP-E cell lines (XP23PV, XP25PV, and a line formerly classified as an XP variant) were defective in UV-DDB binding activity but had levels of RPA in the normal range. The XP-E cell extracts did not display a significant nucleotide excision repair defect in vitro, with either UV-irradiated DNA or a uniquely placed cisplatin lesion used as a substrate. Purified UV-DDB protein did not stimulate repair of naked DNA by DDB⁻ XP-E cell extracts, but microinjection of the protein into DDB⁻ XP-E cells could partially correct the repair defect. RPA stimulated repair in normal, XP-E, or complemented extracts from other XP groups, and so the effect of RPA was not specific for XP-E cell extracts. These data strengthen the connection between XP-E and UV-DDB. Coupled with previous results, the findings suggest that UV-DDB has a role in the repair of DNA in chromatin.The heritable human disorder xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is chiefly characterized by an increased incidence of benign and malignant skin lesions after exposure to sunlight. Affected individuals fall into one of eight different genetic complementation groups. Cells from the seven complementation groups A through G have reduced nucleotide excision repair (NER) of damaged DNA, while cells from the variant, or V, group are defective in a less-defined process of cellular recovery after DNA damage (11). Genes and proteins representing XP groups A (XP-A) B, C, D, F, and G have all been isolated and found to represent some of the subunits of the core NER recognition and incision machinery. XP-E is the mildest form of the disorder, and cells of this group generally have 40 to 60% of the normal repair level, as shown by autoradiographic measurement of unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) after UV irradiation. Cell fusion studies have assigned at least 16 individuals to this form of the disorder (6, 19, 23, 40).There are several indications that a DNA damage binding protein denoted UV-DDB (or DDB) is involved in the primary XP-E defect. The protein has been detected in extracts of vertebrate cells as an activity that preferentially binds damaged oligonucleotides in electrophoretic mobility shift or filter binding assays. The protein has a particular affinity for (6-4) photoproducts in UV-irradiated DNA (10, 15, 16, 34, 41, 43), but UV-DDB also binds to DNA damaged by other agents, including cisplatin and nitrogen mustard (32). The activity has been purified as a single 127-kDa protein (2) and as a complex with two subunits of 127 and 48 kDa (21). Damage-binding activity is missing from some cells in the XP-E group, designated DDB⁻, but is present in other XP-E cell lines, designated DDB⁺ (3, 15, 19, 23). The genes encoding the p127 protein (7, 17, 39) and the p48 protein (7) have been isolated, but DNA sequence features have not yet yielded firm clues about their functions. Microinjection of purified UV-DDB into XP-E cells lacking UV-DDB activity substantially corrects the NER defect, as measured by UDS after UV irradiation, but UV-DDB⁺ cells are not corrected (22). Sequence alterations in the gene for p48 have been reported for several XP-E cell lines (29), and it is possible that these are causative mutations for XP-E.There are also suggestions that the single-stranded DNA binding activity of replication protein A (RPA) is involved in the XP-E defect. RPA is a heterotrimer of three subunits with sizes of 70, 34, and 14 kDa that plays key roles in DNA replication, recombination, and DNA repair (44). It is one of the core components of the eukaryotic nucleotide excision-incision system (1, 12, 28). With regard to XP, it was recently reported that XP-E cell extracts are severely defective in NER in vitro and that RPA can specifically correct the repair defect of these extracts, but not those of extracts of other complementation groups (20). Moreover, it has been found that RPA copurifies to some extent with UV-DDB protein and that the two proteins interact, showing a tighter association with chromatin after UV irradiation of cells (31).The availability of lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from three newly identified XP-E individuals has given us the opportunity to further investigate the possible relationships of UV-DDB and RPA to the molecular defect in XP-E and the influence of these proteins on NER.     

Splitting the BLOSUM Score into Numbers of Biological Significance

Mathematical tools developed in the context of Shannon information theory were used to analyze the meaning of the BLOSUM score, which was split into three components termed as the BLOSUM spectrum (or BLOSpectrum). These relate respectively to the sequence convergence (the stochastic similarity of the two protein sequences), to the background frequency divergence (typicality of the amino acid probability distribution in each sequence), and to the target frequency divergence (compliance of the amino acid variations between the two sequences to the protein model implicit in the BLOCKS database). This treatment sharpens the protein sequence comparison, providing a rationale for the biological significance of the obtained score, and helps to identify weakly related sequences. Moreover, the BLOSpectrum can guide the choice of the most appropriate scoring matrix, tailoring it to the evolutionary divergence associated with the two sequences, or indicate if a compositionally adjusted matrix could perform better.[1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]     

Defining the Structural Basis of Human Plasminogen Binding by Streptococcal Surface Enolase

The flesh-eating bacterium group A Streptococcus (GAS) binds and activates human plasminogen, promoting invasive disease. Streptococcal surface enolase (SEN), a glycolytic pathway enzyme, is an identified plasminogen receptor of GAS. Here we used mass spectrometry (MS) to confirm that GAS SEN is octameric, thereby validating in silico modeling based on the crystal structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae α-enolase. Site-directed mutagenesis of surface-located lysine residues (SEN^{K252 + 255A}, SEN^K304A, SEN^K334A, SEN^K344E, SEN^K435L, and SEN^Δ434–435) was used to examine their roles in maintaining structural integrity, enzymatic function, and plasminogen binding. Structural integrity of the GAS SEN octamer was retained for all mutants except SEN^K344E, as determined by circular dichroism spectroscopy and MS. However, ion mobility MS revealed distinct differences in the stability of several mutant octamers in comparison with wild type. Enzymatic analysis indicated that SEN^K344E had lost α-enolase activity, which was also reduced in SEN^K334A and SEN^Δ434–435. Surface plasmon resonance demonstrated that the capacity to bind human plasminogen was abolished in SEN^{K252 + 255A}, SEN^K435L, and SEN^Δ434–435. The lysine residues at positions 252, 255, 434, and 435 therefore play a concerted role in plasminogen acquisition. This study demonstrates the ability of combining in silico structural modeling with ion mobility-MS validation for undertaking functional studies on complex protein structures.Streptococcus pyogenes (group A Streptococcus, GAS)⁸ is a common bacterial pathogen, causing over 700 million human disease episodes each year (1). These range from serious life-threatening invasive diseases including necrotizing fasciitis and streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome to non-invasive infections like pharyngitis and pyoderma. Invasive disease, in combination with postinfection immune sequelae including rheumatic heart disease and acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis, account for over half a million deaths each year (1). Although a resurgence of GAS invasive infections has occurred in western countries since the mid-1980s, disease burden is much greater in developing countries and indigenous populations of developed nations, where GAS infections are endemic (2–4).GAS is able to bind human plasminogen and activate the captured zymogen to the serine protease plasmin (5–17). The capacity of GAS to do this plays a critical role in virulence and invasive disease initiation (3, 17–19). The plasminogen activation system in humans is an important and highly regulated process that is responsible for breakdown of extracellular matrix components, dissolution of blood clots, and cell migration (20, 21). Plasminogen is a 92-kDa zymogen that circulates in human plasma at a concentration of 2 μm (22). It consists of a binding region of five homologous triple loop kringle domains and an N-terminal serine protease domain that flank the Arg⁵⁶¹–Val⁵⁶² site (23), where it is cleaved by tissue plasminogen activator and urokinase plasminogen activator to yield the active protease plasmin (20, 23). GAS also has the ability to activate human plasminogen by secreting the virulence determinant streptokinase. Streptokinase forms stable complexes with plasminogen or plasmin, both of which exhibit plasmin activity (20, 24). Activation of plasminogen by the plasmin(ogen)-streptokinase complex circumvents regulation by the host plasminogen activation inhibitors, α₂-antiplasmin and α₂-macroglobulin (11, 20). GAS can bind the plasmin(ogen)-streptokinase complex and/or plasmin(ogen) directly via plasmin(ogen) receptors at the bacterial cell surface (6). These receptors include the plasminogen-binding group A streptococcal M-like protein (PAM) (25), the PAM-related protein (19), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; also known as streptococcal plasmin receptor, Plr, or streptococcal surface dehydrogenase) (9, 26), and streptococcal surface enolase (SEN or α-enolase) (27). Interactions with these GAS receptors occurs via lysine-binding sites within the kringle domains of plasminogen (6).In addition to its ability to bind human plasminogen, SEN is primarily the glycolytic enzyme that converts 2-phosphoglycerate to phosphoenolpyruvate (27–29). SEN is abundantly expressed in the cytosol of most bacterial species but has also been identified as a surface-located protein in GAS and other bacteria including pneumococci, despite lacking classical cell surface protein motifs such as a signal sequence, membrane-spanning domain, or cell-wall anchor motif (27, 28, 30, 31). The interaction between SEN and plasminogen is reported to be facilitated by the two C-terminal lysine residues at positions 434 and 435 (27, 32). In contrast, an internal binding motif containing lysines at positions 252 and 255 in the closely related α-enolase of Streptococcus pneumoniae has been shown to play a pivotal role in the acquisition of plasminogen in this bacterial species (33). The octameric pneumococcal α-enolase structure consists of a tetramer of dimers. Hence, potential binding sites could be buried in the interface between subunits. In fact, the crystal structure of S. pneumoniae α-enolase revealed that the two C-terminal lysine residues are significantly less exposed than the internal plasminogen-binding motif (34).In this study, we constructed an in silico model of GAS SEN, based on the pneumococcal octameric α-enolase crystal structure, and validated this model using ion mobility (IM) mass spectrometry (MS). Site-directed mutagenesis followed by structural and functional analyses revealed that Lys³⁴⁴ plays a crucial role in structural integrity and enzymatic function. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the plasminogen-binding motif residues Lys²⁵² and Lys²⁵⁵ and the C-terminal Lys⁴³⁴ and Lys⁴³⁵ residues are located adjacently in the GAS SEN structure and play a concerted role in the binding of human plasminogen.     

Tyrosine Phosphorylation at a Site Highly Conserved in the L1 Family of Cell Adhesion Molecules Abolishes Ankyrin Binding and Increases Lateral Mobility of Neurofascin

This paper presents evidence that a member of the L1 family of ankyrin-binding cell adhesion molecules is a substrate for protein tyrosine kinase(s) and phosphatase(s), identifies the highly conserved FIGQY tyrosine in the cytoplasmic domain as the principal site of phosphorylation, and demonstrates that phosphorylation of the FIGQY tyrosine abolishes ankyrin-binding activity. Neurofascin expressed in neuroblastoma cells is subject to tyrosine phosphorylation after activation of tyrosine kinases by NGF or bFGF or inactivation of tyrosine phosphatases with vanadate or dephostatin. Furthermore, both neurofascin and the related molecule Nr-CAM are tyrosine phosphorylated in a developmentally regulated pattern in rat brain. The FIGQY sequence is present in the cytoplasmic domains of all members of the L1 family of neural cell adhesion molecules. Phosphorylation of the FIGQY tyrosine abolishes ankyrin binding, as determined by coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous ankyrin and in vitro ankyrin-binding assays. Measurements of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching demonstrate that phosphorylation of the FIGQY tyrosine also increases lateral mobility of neurofascin expressed in neuroblastoma cells to the same extent as removal of the cytoplasmic domain. Ankyrin binding, therefore, appears to regulate the dynamic behavior of neurofascin and is the target for regulation by tyrosine phosphorylation in response to external signals. These findings suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation at the FIGQY site represents a highly conserved mechanism, used by the entire class of L1-related cell adhesion molecules, for regulation of ankyrin-dependent connections to the spectrin skeleton.Vertebrate L1, neurofascin, neuroglial cell adhesion molecule (Ng-CAM),¹ Ng-CAM–related cell adhesion molecule (Nr-CAM), and Drosophila neuroglian are members of a family of nervous system cell adhesion molecules that possess variable extracellular domains comprised of Ig and fibronectin type III domains and a relatively conserved cytoplasmic domain (Grumet, 1991; Hortsch and Goodman, 1991; Rathgen and Jessel, 1991; Sonderegger and Rathgen, 1992; Hortsch, 1996). Members of this family, including a number of alternatively spliced forms, are abundant in the nervous system during early development as well as in adults. Neurofascin and Nr-CAM, for example, constitute ∼0.5% of the total membrane protein in adult brain (Davis et al., 1993; Davis and Bennett, 1994). Cellular functions attributed to the L1 family include axon fasciculation (Stallcup and Beasley, 1985; Landmesser et al., 1988; Brummendorf and Rathjen, 1993; Bastmeyer et al., 1995; Itoh et al., 1995; Magyar-Lehmann et al., 1995), axonal guidance (van den Pol and Kim, 1993; Liljelund et al., 1994; Brittis and Silver, 1995; Brittis et al., 1995; Lochter et al., 1995; Wong et al., 1996), neurite extension (Chang et al., 1987; Felsenfeld et al., 1994; Hankin and Lagenaur, 1994; Ignelzi et al., 1994; Williams et al., 1994a ,b,c,d; Doherty et al., 1995; Zhao and Siu, 1995), a role in long term potentiation (Luthl et al., 1994), synaptogenesis (Itoh et al., 1995), and myelination (Wood et al., 1990). The potential clinical importance of this group of proteins has been emphasized by the findings that mutations in the L1 gene on the X chromosome are responsible for developmental anomalies including hydrocephalus and mental retardation (Rosenthal et al., 1992; Jouet et al., 1994; Wong et al., 1995).The conserved cytoplasmic domains of L1 family members include a binding site for the membrane skeletal protein ankyrin. This interaction was first described for neurofascin (Davis et. al., 1993) and subsequently has been observed for L1, Nr-CAM (Davis and Bennett, 1994), and Drosophila neuroglian (Dubreuil et al., 1996). The membrane-binding domain of ankyrin contains two distinct sites for neurofascin and has the potential to promote lateral association of neurofascin and presumably other L1 family members (Michaely and Bennett, 1995). Nodes of Ranvier are physiologically relevant axonal sites where ankyrin and L1 family members collaborate, based on findings of colocalization of a specialized isoform of ankyrin with alternatively spliced forms of neurofascin and NrCAM in adults (Davis et al., 1996) as well as in early axonal developmental intermediates (Lambert, S., J. Davis, P. Michael, and V. Bennett. 1995. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:98a).L1, after homophilic and/or heterophilic binding, participates in signal transduction pathways that ultimately are associated with neurite extension and outgrowth (Ignelzi et al., 1994; Williams et al., 1994a ,b,c,d; Doherty et al., 1995). L1 copurifies with a serine–threonine protein kinase (Sadoul et al., 1989) and is phosphorylated on a serine residue that is not conserved among other family members (Wong et al., 1996). L1 pathway(s) may also involve G proteins, calcium channels, and tyrosine phosphorylation (Williams et al., 1994a ,b,c,d; Doherty et al., 1995). After homophilic interactions, L1 directly activates a tyrosine signaling cascade after a lateral association of its ectodomain with the fibroblast growth factor receptor (Doherty et al., 1995). Antibodies against L1 have also been shown to activate protein tyrosine phosphatase activity in growth cones (Klinz et al., 1995). However, details of the downstream substrates of L1-promoted phosphorylation and dephosphorylation and possible roles of the cytoplasmic domain are not known.Tyrosine phosphorylation is well established to modulate cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions involving integrins and their associated proteins (Akiyama et al., 1994; Arroyo et al., 1994; Schlaepfer et al., 1994; Law et al., 1996) as well as the cadherins (Balsamo et al., 1996; Krypta et al., 1996; Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995; Shibamoto et al., 1995; Hoschuetzky et al., 1994; Matsuyoshi et al., 1992). For example, the adhesive functions of the calciumdependent cadherin cell adhesion molecule are mediated by a dynamic balance between tyrosine phosphorylation of β-catenin by TrkA and dephosphorylation via the LARtype protein tyrosine phosphatase (Krypta et al., 1996). In this example the regulation of binding among the structural proteins is the result of a coordination between classes of protein kinases and protein phosphatases.This study presents evidence that neurofascin, expressed in a rat neuroblastoma cell line, is a substrate for both tyrosine kinases and protein tyrosine phosphatases at a tyrosine residue conserved among all members of the L1 family. Site-specific tyrosine phosphorylation promoted by both tyrosine kinase activators (NGF and bFGF) and protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors (dephostatin and vanadate) is a strong negative regulator of the neurofascin– ankyrin binding interaction and modulates the membrane dynamic behavior of neurofascin. Furthermore, neurofascin and, to a lesser extent Nr-CAM, are also shown here to be tyrosine phosphorylated in developing rat brain, implying a physiological relevance to this phenomenon. These results indicate that neurofascin may be a target for the coordinate control over phosphorylation that is elicited by protein kinases and phosphatases during in vivo tyrosine phosphorylation cascades. The consequent decrease in ankyrin-binding capacity due to phosphorylation of neurofascin could represent a general mechanism among the L1 family members for regulation of membrane–cytoskeletal interactions in both developing and adult nervous systems.     

Sequence-Specific Binding of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleocapsid Protein to Short Oligonucleotides

We have analyzed the binding of recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid protein (NC) to very short oligonucleotides by using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technology. Our experiments, which were conducted at a moderate salt concentration (0.15 M NaCl), showed that NC binds more stably to runs of d(G) than to other DNA homopolymers. However, it exhibits far more stable binding with the alternating base sequence d(TG)_n than with any homopolymeric oligodeoxyribonucleotide; thus, it shows a strong sequence preference under our experimental conditions. We found that the minimum length of an alternating d(TG) sequence required for stable binding was five nucleotides. Stable binding to the tetranucleotide d(TG)₂ was observed only under conditions where two tetranucleotide molecules were held in close spatial proximity. The stable, sequence-specific binding to d(TG)_n required that both zinc fingers be present, each in its proper position in the NC protein, and was quite salt resistant, indicating a large hydrophobic contribution to the binding. Limited tests with RNA oligonucleotides indicated that the preferential sequence-specific binding observed with DNA also occurs with RNA. Evidence was also obtained that NC can bind to nucleic acid molecules in at least two distinct modes. The biological significance of the specific binding we have detected is not known; it may reflect the specificity with which the parent Gag polyprotein packages genomic RNA or may relate to the functions of NC after cleavage of the polyprotein, including its role as a nucleic acid chaperone.A single protein species, the Gag polyprotein, is sufficient for assembly of retrovirus particles. Since this process includes the selective encapsidation of viral RNA, this protein is evidently capable of specific interactions with nucleic acids. The nature of these interactions is not well understood as yet. After the virion is released from the cell, the polyprotein is cleaved by the virus-encoded protease; one of the cleavage products, termed the nucleocapsid protein (NC), then binds to the genomic RNA, forming the ribonucleoprotein core of the mature particle (21, 35, 41).The interaction between Gag and the genomic RNA is known to involve the NC domain of the polyprotein, since mutants within this domain of Gag are defective in RNA packaging (e.g., references 2, 16, 17, 24–27, 31, 36, 37, and 39) and since the specificity of encapsidation tends to be determined by the NC domain in chimeric Gag molecules (9, 18, 49). However, NC is a basic protein and has frequently been described as binding to single-stranded DNA or RNA in a sequence-independent manner. Indeed, it is probably capable of binding to any single-stranded nucleic acid under appropriate conditions. This binding activity appears to be crucial at several stages of virus replication (13, 19, 28, 46).In the experiments described here, we have analyzed the binding of recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) NC to short oligonucleotides. These studies were performed at moderate ionic strengths, at which the nonspecific electrostatic interaction between NC and nucleic acids is minimized. We find that under these conditions, the protein exhibits profound sequence preferences. This sequence-specific binding is dependent upon the zinc fingers of the protein and has a strong hydrophobic component. The biological significance of this sequence specificity is not clear at present, but the results suggest that studies with very short oligonucleotides may provide important insights into NC function and perhaps functions of Gag as well.