Modulation of Ca2+ influx by corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family of peptides via CRF receptors in rat pancreatic beta-cells

The actions of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family of peptides are mediated by the seven transmembrane-domain G-protein-coupled receptors, the CRF receptors type 1 (CRF1 receptor) and type 2 (CRF2 receptor). In a previous study, we reported that CRF, an endogenous ligand for CRF1 receptor, modulated Ca2+ influx in rat pancreatic beta-cells. In addition to CRF, other additional members of the family, urocortins, have been identified in mammals. Urocortin 1 (UCN 1), a peptide of the CRF family, binds both CRF1 receptor and CRF2 receptor with equal affinities. Urocortin 3 (UCN 3), a highly selective ligand for CRF2 receptor with little affinity for CRF1 receptor, has been shown in rat pancreatic beta-cells. The present study focused on the effects of the CRF family peptides on intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) concentration via CRF receptors in rat pancreatic beta-cells. Microfluorimetric experiments showed that CRF (0.2 nM) and UCN 1 (0.2 nM) elevated [Ca2+]i levels. Both CRF and UCN 1 effects were attenuated by astressin, a non-selective CRF receptor antagonist. Antisauvagine-30, a selective CRF2 receptor antagonist, appeared to enhance the UCN 1 effect on the elevation of [Ca2+]i. The CRF effect on the elevation of [Ca2+]i was inhibited by the addition of UCN 3. Taken together, the activation of CRF2 receptor antagonizes the CRF1 receptor-stimulated Ca2+ influx.     

Differential responsiveness of CRF receptor subtypes to N-terminal truncation of peptidic ligands

The role of the N-terminal domains of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and CRF-like peptides in receptor subtype selectivity, ligand affinity and biological potency was investigated. Therefore, human CRF(12-41), human URP(12-38) and antisauvagine-30 (aSvg) were N-terminally prolonged by consecutive addition of one or two amino acids. The peptides obtained were tested for their binding affinities to rat CRF1 and murine CRF(2beta) receptor, and their capability to stimulate cAMP-release by HEK cells producing either receptor.It was observed that human CRF N-terminally truncated by eight residues was bound with high affinity to CRF2 receptor (Ki=5.4nM), whereas affinity for CRF1 receptor was decreased (Ki=250 nM). A similar shift of affinity was found with sauvagine (Svg) analogs. Truncation of human URP analogs did not affect their preference for CRF(2beta) receptor, but reduced their affinity. Changes in affinity were positively correlated with changes in potency. These results indicated that CRF1 receptor was more stringent in its structural requirements for ligands to exhibit high affinity binding than CRF(2beta) receptor.     

Distinct conformations of the corticotropin releasing factor type 1 receptor adopted following agonist and antagonist binding are differentially regulated

The corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) type 1 receptor (CRF1) is a class B family G protein-coupled receptor that regulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis. Astressin is an amino-terminal truncated analog of CRF that retains high affinity binding to the extracellular domain of the receptor and is believed to act as a neutral competitive antagonist of receptor activation. Here we show that despite being unable to activate the CRF1 receptor, astressin binding results in the internalization of the receptor. Furthermore, entirely different pathways of internalization of CRF1 receptors are utilized following CRF and astressin binding. CRF causes the receptor to be phosphorylated, recruit beta-arrestin2, and to be internalized rapidly, likely through clathrin-coated pits. Astressin, however, fails to induce receptor phosphorylation or beta-arrestin2 recruitment, and internalization is slow and occurs through a pathway that is insensitive to inhibitors of clathrin-coated pits and caveolae. The fate of the internalized receptors also differs because only CRF-induced internalization results in receptor down-regulation. Furthermore, we present evidence that for astressin to induce internalization it must interact with both the extracellular amino terminus and the juxtamembrane domain of the receptor. Astressin binds with 6-fold higher affinity to full-length CRF1 receptors than to a chimeric protein containing only the extracellular domain attached to the transmembrane domain of the activin IIB receptor, yet two 12-residue analogs of astressin have similar affinities for both proteins but are unable to induce receptor internalization. These data demonstrate that agonists and antagonists for CRF1 receptors promote distinct conformations, which are then differentially regulated.     

Mediation of burn-induced hypermetabolism by CRF receptor-2 activity

Hypermetabolism and anorexia are significant problems associated with major burn trauma. Recent studies have implicated hypothalamic peptides and receptors of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) family as putative mediators of burn-induced hypermetabolism. Increased neuronal activity at the CRF type 2 receptor (CRF R-2) appeared particularly involved in the expression of elevated resting energy expenditure (REE) following major burn trauma. In the present study we continued these investigations of CRF R-2 mediation of burn-induced hypermetabolism, demonstrating that 3rd ventricle injection of CRF R-2 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) normalized REE in burned rats. Similar treatments with CRF or CRF R-1 antisense ODNs had no significant effect in burned rats. In addition, 3rd ventricle injection of the selective CRF R-2 antagonist, antisauvagine-30, also reduced REE significantly in burned rats, while similar treatment with the selective CRF R-1 antagonist, antalarmin, was without effect. To determine which endogenous peptide was altered following burn we measured hypothalamic levels of urocortin (UCN) and CRF 15 days after burn injury, finding UCN was significantly elevated by nearly 3-fold, while CRF level tended to be decreased. We also assessed hypothalamic mRNA peptide and receptor expression by real-time PCR 7, 14, and 21 days post-burn, observing decreased CRF expression 7 and 21 days post-burn, decreased UCN-2 expression 7 days post-burn, and no significant alteration in UCN-1 at any time point. However, CRF R-2 mRNA was elevated at each post-burn time point. These results continue to suggest that increased neuronal activity is integrally involved in the mediation of burn-induced hypermetabolism, and that one of the UCN peptides may be the endogenous ligand affecting this receptor.     

Identification of Amino Acids in the N-Terminal Domain of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor 1 that Are Important Determinants of High-Affinity Ligand Binding

Abstract : The aim of the present study was to identify the N-terminal regions of human corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor type 1 (hCRF-R1) that are crucial for ligand binding. Mutant receptors were constructed by replacing specific residues in hCRF-R1 with amino acids from the corresponding position in the N-terminal region of the human vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor type 2 (hVIP-R2). In cyclic AMP stimulation and CRF binding assays, it was established that two regions within the N-terminal domain were crucial for the binding of CRF receptor agonists and antagonists : one region mapping to amino acids 43-50 and a second amino acid sequence extending from position 76 to 84 of hCRF-R1. Recently, it was found that the latter sequence plays a very important role in determining the high ligand selectivity of the Xenopus CRF-R1 (xCRF-R1). Replacement of amino acids 76-84 of hCRF-R1 with residues from the same segment of the hVIP-R2 N terminus markedly reduced the binding affinity of CRF ligands. Mutation of Arg⁷⁶ or Asn⁸¹ but not Gly⁸³ of hCRF-R1 to the corresponding amino acids of xCRF-R1 or hVIP-R2 resulted in 100-1,000-fold lower affinities for human/rat CRF, rat urocortin, and astressin. These data underline the importance of the N-terminal domain of CRF-R1 in high-affinity ligand binding.     

Development of a selective photoactivatable antagonist for corticotropin-releasing factor receptor, type 2 (CRF2).

A novel photoactivatable analog of antisauvagine-30 (aSvg-30), a specific antagonist for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor, type 2 (CRF2), has been synthesized and characterized. The N-terminal amino-acid d-Phe in aSvg-30 [d-Phe11,His12]Svg(11-40) was replaced by a phenyldiazirine, the 4-(1-azi-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)benzoyl (ATB) residue. The photoactivatable aSvg-30 analog ATB-[His12]Svg was tested for its ability to displace [125I-Tyr0]oCRF or [125I-Tyr0]Svg from membrane homogenates of human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably transfected with cDNA coding for rat CRF receptor, type 1 (rCRF1) or mouse CRF receptor, type 2beta (mCRF2beta). Furthermore, the ability of ATB-[His12]Svg(12-40) to inhibit oCRF- or Svg-stimulated cAMP production of transfected HEK 293 cells expressing either rCRF1 (HEK-rCRF1 cells) or mCRF2beta (HEK-mCRF2beta cells) was determined. Unlike astressin and photo astressin, ATB-[His12]Svg(12-40) showed high selective binding to mCRF2beta (Ki = 3.1 +/- 0.2 nm) but not the rCRF1 receptor (Ki = 142.5 +/- 22.3 nm) and decreased Svg-stimulated cAMP activity in mCRF2beta-expressing cells in a similar fashion as aSvg-30. A 66-kDa protein was identified by SDS/PAGE, when the radioactively iodinated analog of ATB-[His12]Svg(12-40) was covalently linked to mCRF2beta receptor. The specificity of the photoactivatable 125I-labeled CRF2beta antagonist was demonstrated with SDS/PAGE by the finding that this analog could be displaced from the receptor by antisauvagine-30, but not other unrelated peptides such as vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP).     

Novel high-affinity photoactivatable antagonists of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) photoaffinity labeling studies on CRF receptor, type 1 (CRFR1).

Novel photoactivatable antagonists of human/rat corticotropin-releasing factor (h/rCRF) have been synthesized and characterized. The N-terminal amino acid D-phenylalanine in astressin ?cyclo(30-33) [D-Phe12, Nle21,38, Glu30, Lys33]h/rCRF-(12-41)?, a potent CRF peptide antagonist, was replaced by a phenyldiazirine, the 4-(1-azi-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)benzoyl (ATB) residue. Additionally, His32 of astressin was substituted by either alanine or tyrosine for specific radioactive labeling with 125I at either His13 or Tyr32, respectively. The photoactivatable CRF antagonists were tested for their ability to displace 125I-labeled Tyr0 ovine CRF ([125I-labeled Tyr0]oCRF) in binding experiments and to inhibit oCRF-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, permanently transfected with cDNA coding for rat CRF receptor, type 1 (rCRFR1) or human Y-79 retinoblastoma cells known to carry endogenous functional human CRFR1 (hCRFR1). ATB-cyclo(30-33)[Nle21,38, Glu30, Ala32, Lys33]h/rCRF-(13-41) (compound 1) was found to bind with higher affinity to rat or human CRFR1 when compared with ATB-cyclo(30-33)[Nle21,38, Glu30, Tyr32, Lys33]h/rCRF-(13-41) (compound 2) and exhibited higher inhibition of oCRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation in HEK 293 cells stably transfected with cDNA coding for rCRFR1 (HEK-rCRFR1 cells) or Y-79 cells. A highly glycosylated, 66-kDa protein was identified with SDS/PAGE, when the radioactively iodinated compounds 1 or 2 were covalently linked to rCRFR1. The specificity of the photoactivatable 125I-labeled CRF antagonists was demonstrated with SDS/PAGE by the finding that these analogs could be displaced from the receptor by their corresponding nonlabeled form, but not other unrelated peptides such as vasoactive intestinal peptide. The observed molecular size of the receptor was in agreement with the size of CRFR1 found in rat pituitary (66 kDa), but was significantly larger than the size of CRFR1 found in rat cerebellum and olfactory bulb (53 kDa).     

A soluble form of the first extracellular domain of mouse type 2beta corticotropin-releasing factor receptor reveals differential ligand specificity

The heptahelical receptors for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), CRFR1 and CRFR2, display different specificities for CRF family ligands: CRF and urocortin I bind to CRFR1 with high affinity, whereas urocortin II and III bind to this receptor with very low affinities. In contrast, all the urocortins bind with high affinities, and CRF binds with lower affinity to CRFR2. The first extracellular domain (ECD1) of CRFR1 is important for ligand recognition. Here, we characterize a bacterially expressed soluble protein, ECD1-CRFR2beta, corresponding to the ECD1 of mouse CRFR2beta. The K(i) values for binding to ECD1-CRFR2beta are: astressin = 10.7 (5.4-21.1) nm, urocortin I = 6.4 (4.7-8.7) nm, urocortin II = 6.9 (5.8-8.3) nm, CRF = 97 (22-430) nm, urocortin III = sauvagine >200 nm. These affinities are similar to those for binding to a chimeric receptor in which the ECD1 of CRFR2beta replaces the ECD of the type 1B activin receptor (ALK4). The ECD1-CRFR2beta possesses a disulfide arrangement identical to that of the ECD1 of CRFR1, namely Cys(45)-Cys(70), Cys(60)-Cys(103), and Cys(84)-Cys(118). As determined by circular dichroism, ECD1-CRFR2beta undergoes conformational changes upon binding astressin. These data reinforce the importance of the ECD1 of CRF receptors for ligand recognition and raise the interesting possibility that different ligands having similar affinity for the full-length receptor may, nevertheless, have different affinities for microdomains of the receptor.     

Molecular determinants of tuberoinfundibular peptide of 39 residues (TIP39) selectivity for the parathyroid hormone-2 (PTH2) receptor. N-terminal truncation of TIP39 reverses PTH2 receptor/PTH1 receptor binding selectivity

Tuberoinfundibular peptide of 39 residues (TIP39) and the parathyroid hormone-2 (PTH2) receptor form part of an extended family of related signaling molecules that includes the PTH1 receptor, which responds to PTH and PTH-related protein. TIP39 does not appreciably activate the PTH1 receptor, but in this study it is shown to bind the receptor with moderate affinity (59 nm). In this study, we investigated the molecular determinants of both ligand and receptor for the PTH2 receptor selectivity of TIP39 and quantitatively evaluated the role of molecular elements in the binding of TIP39 to the PTH2 and PTH1 receptors. A chimeric receptor composed of the N-terminal extracellular domain of the PTH1 receptor and the remainder (juxtamembrane domain) of the PTH2 receptor (P2-NP1) was fully activated by TIP39 (E(max) = 98% of the rPTH-(1-34), E(max), EC(50) = 2.0 nm). This receptor chimera bound TIP39 with an equivalent affinity to the wild-type PTH2 receptor (2. 3 and 2.0 nm, respectively). The reciprocal chimeric receptor (P1-NP2) was not activated by TIP39 and bound the ligand with an affinity equivalent to that of the PTH1 receptor. Thus, the juxtamembrane receptor domain specifies the signaling and binding selectivity of TIP39 for the PTH2 receptor over the PTH1 receptor. Removing six N-terminal residues of TIP39 eliminated activation of the PTH2 receptor and reduced binding affinity 70-fold. In contrast, this truncation increased affinity for the PTH1 receptor 10-fold, reversing the PTH2/PTH1 receptor binding selectivity and resulting in a high affinity interaction of TIP-(7-39) with the PTH1 receptor (6 nm). These findings can be explained by a strong interaction between the N-terminal region of TIP39 and the juxtamembrane domain of the PTH2 receptor, with the corresponding domain of the PTH1 receptor acting as a selectivity barrier against high affinity binding of TIP39. As a result, TIP-(7-39) is a highly potent, selective antagonist for the PTH1 receptor.     

Ligand affinity for amino-terminal and juxtamembrane domains of the corticotropin releasing factor type I receptor: regulation by G-protein and nonpeptide antagonists

Peptide ligands bind the CRF(1) receptor by a two-domain mechanism: the ligand's carboxyl-terminal portion binds the receptor's extracellular N-terminal domain (N-domain) and the ligand's amino-terminal portion binds the receptor's juxtamembrane domain (J-domain). Little quantitative information is available regarding this mechanism. Specifically, the microaffinity of the two interactions and their contribution to overall ligand affinity are largely undetermined. Here we measured ligand interaction with N- and J-domains expressed independently, the former (residues 1-118) fused to the activin IIB receptor's membrane-spanning alpha-helix (CRF(1)-N) and the latter comprising residues 110-415 (CRF(1)-J). We also investigated the effect of nonpeptide antagonist and G-protein on ligand affinity for N- and J-domains. Peptide agonist affinity for CRF(1)-N was only 1.1-3.5-fold lower than affinity for the whole receptor (CRF(1)-R), suggesting the N-domain predominantly contributes to peptide agonist affinity. Agonist interaction with CRF(1)-J (potency for stimulating cAMP accumulation) was 12000-1500000-fold weaker than with CRF(1)-R, indicating very weak direct agonist interaction with the J-domain. Nonpeptide antagonist affinity for CRF(1)-J and CRF(1)-R was indistinguishable, indicating the compounds bind predominantly the J-domain. Agonist activation of CRF(1)-J was fully blocked by nonpeptide antagonist, suggesting antagonism results from inhibition of agonist-J-domain interaction. G-protein coupling with CRF(1)-R (forming RG) increased peptide agonist affinity 92-1300-fold, likely resulting from enhanced agonist interaction with the J-domain rather than the N-domain. Nonpeptide antagonists, which bind the J-domain, blocked peptide agonist binding to RG, and binding of peptide antagonists, predominantly to the N-domain, was unaffected by R-G coupling. These findings extend the two-domain model quantitatively and are consistent with a simple equilibrium model of the two-domain mechanism: (1) The N-domain binds peptide agonist with moderate-to-high microaffinity, substantially increasing the local concentration of agonist and so allowing weak agonist-J-domain interaction. (2) Agonist-J-domain interaction is allosterically enhanced by receptor-G-protein interaction and inhibited by nonpeptide antagonist.     

Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor subtypes mediating nutritional suppression of estrous behavior in Syrian hamsters

Caloric deprivation inhibits reproduction, including copulatory behaviors, in female mammals. Decreases in metabolic fuel availability are detected in the hindbrain, and this information is relayed to the forebrain circuits controlling estrous behavior by neuropeptide Y (NPY) projections. In the forebrain, the nutritional inhibition of estrous behavior appears to be mediated by corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) or urocortin-signaling systems. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of the CRF antagonist, astressin, prevents the suppression of lordosis by food deprivation and by NPY treatment in Syrian hamsters. These experiments sought to determine which CRF receptor type(s) is involved. ICV infusion of the CRF receptor subtype CRFR2-selective agonists urocortin 2 and 3 (UCN2, UCN3) inhibited sexual receptivity in hormone-primed, ovariectomized hamsters. Furthermore, the CRFR2-selective antagonist, astressin 2B, prevented the inhibition of estrous behavior by UCN2 and by NPY, consistent with a role for CRFR2. On the other hand, astressin 2B did not prevent the inhibition of behavior induced by 48-h food deprivation or ICV administration of CRF, a mixed CRFR1 and CRFR2 agonist, suggesting that activation of CRFR1 signaling is sufficient to inhibit sexual receptivity in hamsters. Although administration of CRFR1-selective antagonists (NBI-27914 and CP-154,526) failed to reverse the inhibition of receptivity by CRF treatment, we could not confirm their biological effectiveness in hamsters. The most parsimonious interpretation of these findings is that, although NPY inhibits estrous behavior via downstream CRFR2 signaling, food deprivation may exert its inhibition via both CRFR1 and CRFR2 and that redundant neuropeptide systems may be involved.     

Photoaffinity cross-linking of the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 1 with photoreactive urocortin analogues

Interaction of natural peptide ligands with class 2 GPCRs, which are targets of biologically important hormones such as glucagon, secretin, and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), occurs with a common orientation, in that the ligand C-terminus binds to the extracellular receptor N-terminus, whereas the ligand N-terminus binds to the receptor juxtamembrane domain. N-Terminal truncation, by eight amino acids in the case of CRF, leads to antagonists, suggesting those residues constitute the receptor activating sequence. Here, we identified by photoaffinity cross-linking using p-benzoyl-l-phenylalanine (Bpa) analogues of urocortin (Ucn) the most affine CRF receptor agonist, interaction domains of CRF(1) receptor with Bpa residues at exclusive positions. Specific cleavage patterns of the corresponding ligand-receptor complexes, obtained using several cleavage methods in combination with SDS-PAGE for fragment size determination, showed that a Bpa group located N-terminally or in position 12 binds at the second and such in position 17 or 22 at the first extracellular receptor loop. Our results indicate that the very N-terminal ligand residues (1-11), which are responsible for receptor activation, are oriented to the juxtamembrane domain by interaction of amino acid residues 12, 17, and 22. Our findings contradict a recently proposed interaction model derived from ligand interaction with a soluble receptor N-terminus, indicating that conclusions drawn from such a reduced system may be of limited value to understand the interaction with the full-length receptor.     

Urocortin 1 reduces food intake and ghrelin secretion via CRF(2) receptors

Although it is known that urocortin 1 (UCN) acts on both corticotropin-releasing factor receptors (CRF(1) and CRF(2)), the mechanisms underlying UCN-induced anorexia remain unclear. In contrast, ghrelin, the endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, stimulates food intake. In the present study, we examined the effects of CRF(1) and CRF(2) receptor antagonists (CRF(1)a and CRF(2)a) on ghrelin secretion and synthesis, c-fos mRNA expression in the caudal brain stem, and food intake following intracerebroventricular administration of UCN. Eight-week-old, male Sprague-Dawley rats were used after 24-h food deprivation. Acylated and des-acylated ghrelin levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The mRNA expressions of preproghrelin and c-fos were measured by real-time RT-PCR. The present study provided the following important insights into the mechanisms underlying the anorectic effects of UCN: 1) UCN increased acylated and des-acylated ghrelin levels in the gastric body and decreased their levels in the plasma; 2) UCN decreased preproghrelin mRNA levels in the gastric body; 3) UCN-induced reduction of plasma ghrelin and food intake were restored by CRF(2)a but not CRF(1)a; 4) UCN-induced increase of c-fos mRNA levels in the caudal brain stem containing the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) was inhibited by CRF(2)a; and 5) UCN-induced reduction of food intake was restored by exogenous ghrelin and rikkunshito, an endogenous ghrelin secretion regulator. Thus, UCN increases neuronal activation in the caudal brain stem containing NTS via CRF(2) receptors, which may be related to UCN-induced inhibition of both ghrelin secretion and food intake.     

Expression and effects of metabotropic CRF1 and CRF2 receptors in rat small intestine

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-like peptides mediate their effects via two receptor subtypes, CRF1 and CRF2; these receptors have functional implication in the motility of the stomach and colon in rats. We evaluated expression and functions of CRF1 and CRF2 receptors in the rat small intestine (i.e., duodenum and ileum). CRF(1-2)-like immunoreactivity (CRF(1-2)-LI) was localized in fibers and neurons of the myenteric and submucosal ganglia. CRF(1-2)-LI was found in nerve fibers of the longitudinal and circular muscle layers, in the mucosa, and in mucosal cells. Quantitative RT-PCR showed a stronger expression of CRF2 than CRF1 in the ileum, whereas CRF1 expression was higher than CRF2 expression in the duodenum. Functional studies showed that CRF-like peptides increased duodenal phasic contractions and reduced ileal contractions. CRF1 antagonists (CP-154,526 and SSR125543Q) blocked CRF-like peptide-induced activation of duodenal motility but did not block CRF-like peptide-induced inhibition of ileal motility. In contrast, a CRF2 inhibitor (astressin2-B) blocked the effects of CRF-like peptides on ileal muscle contractions but did not influence CRF-like peptide-induced activation of duodenal motility. These results demonstrate the presence of CRF(1-2) in the intestine and demonstrate that, in vitro, CRF-like peptides stimulate the contractile activity of the duodenum through CRF1 receptor while inhibiting phasic contractions of the ileum through CRF2 receptor. These results strongly suggest that CRF-like peptides play a major role in the regulatory mechanisms that underlie the neural control of small intestinal motility through CRF receptors.     

Expression, binding, and signaling properties of CRF2(a) receptors endogenously expressed in human retinoblastoma Y79 cells: passage-dependent regulation of functional receptors

Endogenous expression of the corticotropin-releasing factor type 2a receptor [CRF2(a)] but not CRF2(b) and CRF2(c) was observed in higher passage cultures of human Y79 retinoblastoma cells. Functional studies further demonstrated an increase in CRF2(a) mRNA and protein levels with higher passage numbers (> 20 passages). Although the CRF1 receptor was expressed at higher levels than the CRF2(a) receptor, both receptors were easily distinguishable from one another by selective receptor ligands. CRF(1)-preferring or non-selective agonists such as CRF, urocortin 1 (UCN1), and sauvagine stimulated cAMP production in Y79 to maximal responses of approximately 100 pmoles/10(5) cells, whereas the exclusive CRF2 receptor-selective agonists UCN2 and 3 stimulated cAMP production to maximal responses of approximately 25-30 pmoles/10(5) cells. UCN2 and 3-mediated cAMP stimulation was potently blocked by the approximately 300-fold selective CRF2 antagonist antisauvagine (IC50 = 6.5 +/- 1.6 nmol/L), whereas the CRF(1)-selective antagonist NBI27914 only blocked cAMP responses at concentrations > 10 microL. When the CRF(1)-preferring agonist ovine CRF was used to activate cAMP signaling, NBI27914 (IC50 = 38.4 +/- 3.6 nmol/L) was a more potent inhibitor than antisauvagine (IC50 = 2.04 +/- 0.2 microL). Finally, UCN2 and 3 treatment potently and rapidly desensitized the CRF2 receptor responses in Y79 cells. These data demonstrate that Y79 cells express functional CRF1 and CRF2a receptors and that the CRF2(a) receptor protein is up-regulated during prolonged culture.     

Secondary structure of antisauvagine analogues is important for CRF receptor antagonism: development of antagonists with increased potency and receptor selectivity

Antisauvagine-30 (aSVG) is the only high-affinity antagonist for the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) type 2 (CRF(2)) receptor. A structure-activity relationship study was performed to pinpoint residues conferring aSVG's selectivity. The aSVG-analogues being N-terminally extended by one or two residues or containing the Ala(22)Arg(23)Ala(24) (ARA-motif) of CRF, were synthesized. Additionally, a lactam bridge between positions 29 and 32 was introduced. The modified peptides were analyzed for alpha-helicity properties, binding affinities and antagonistic potencies at the rat CRF(1) and mouse CRF(2B) receptors. While N-terminal prolongation and replacement of D-Phe(11) by Tyr(11) increased the affinity for the CRF(2) receptor, the introduction of the ARA motif resulted in a loss of CRF(2) receptor selectivity. These data show that aSVG(10-40) analogues are more potent CRF(2) receptor antagonists than aSVG(11-40) peptides, while introduction of the ARA-motif or a cyclic constraint between residues 29 and 32 favors binding to the CRF(1) receptor.     

Expression, purification, and characterization of a soluble form of the first extracellular domain of the human type 1 corticotropin releasing factor receptor.

The first extracellular domain (ECD-1) of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) type 1 receptor, (CRFR1), is important for binding of CRF ligands. A soluble protein, mNT-CRFR1, produced by COS M6 cells transfected with a cDNA encoding amino acids 1--119 of human CRFR1 and modified to include epitope tags, binds a CRF antagonist, astressin, in a radioreceptor assay using [(125)I-d-Tyr(0)]astressin. N-terminal sequencing of mNT-CRFR1 showed the absence of the first 23 amino acids of human CRFR1. This result suggests that the CRFR1 protein is processed to cleave a putative signal peptide corresponding to amino acids 1--23. A cDNA encoding amino acids 24--119 followed by a FLAG tag, was expressed as a thioredoxin fusion protein in Escherichia coli. Following thrombin cleavage, the purified protein (bNT-CRFR1) binds astressin and the agonist urocortin with high affinity. Reduced, alkylated bNT-CRFR1 does not bind [(125)I-D-Tyr(0)]astressin. Mass spectrometric analysis of photoaffinity labeled bNT-CRFR1 yielded a 1:1 complex with ligand. Analysis of the disulfide arrangement of bNT-CRFR1 revealed bonds between Cys(30) and Cys(54), Cys(44) and Cys(87), and Cys(68) and Cys(102). This arrangement is similar to that of the ECD-1 of the parathyroid hormone receptor (PTHR), suggesting a conserved structural motif in the N-terminal domain of this family of receptors.     

Peripheral urocortin inhibits gastric emptying and food intake in mice: differential role of CRF receptor 2

Intraperitoneal urocortin inhibits gastric emptying and food intake in mice. We investigated corticotropin-releasing factor receptor (CRF-R) subtypes involved in intraperitoneal urocortin actions using selective CRF-R antagonists. Gastric emptying was measured 2 h after a chow meal, and food intake was measured hourly after an 18-h fast in mice. Urocortin (3 microg/kg ip) inhibited gastric emptying by 88%. The CRF-R1/CRF-R2 antagonist astressin B (30 microg/kg ip) and the selective CRF-R2 antagonist antisauvagine-30 (100 microg/kg ip) completely antagonized urocortin action, whereas the selective CRF-R1 antagonist CP-154,526 (10 mg/kg ip) had no effect. Urocortin (1-10 microg/kg ip) dose dependently decreased the 2-h cumulative food intake by 30-62%. Urocortin (3 microg/kg)-induced hypophagia was completely antagonized by astressin B (30 microg/kg ip) and partially (35 and 31%) by antisauvagine-30 (100 or 200 microg/kg ip). The CRF-R1 antagonists CP-154,526 or DMP904 (10 mg/kg ip) had no effect. Capsaicin did not alter urocortin-inhibitory actions while blocking the satiety effect of intraperitoneal CCK. These data indicate that intraperitoneal urocortin-induced decrease in feeding is only partly mediated by CRF-R2, whereas urocortin action to delay gastric emptying of a meal involves primarily CRF-R2.