Marine Biofilms as Mediators of Colonization by Marine Macroorganisms: Implications for Antifouling and Aquaculture

In the marine environment, biofilms on submerged surfaces can promote or discourage the settlement of invertebrate larvae and macroalgal spores. The settlement-mediating effects of biofilms are believed to involve a variety of biofilm attributes including surface chemistry, micro-topography, and a wide range of microbial products from small-molecule metabolites to high-molecular weight extracellular polymers. The settled organisms in turn can modify microbial species composition of biofilms and thus change the biofilm properties and dynamics. A better understanding of biofilm dynamics and chemical signals released and/or stored by biofilms will facilitate the development of antifouling and mariculture technologies. This review provides a brief account of 1) existing knowledge of marine biofilms that are relevant to settlement mediation, 2) biotechnological application of biofilms with respect to developing non-toxic antifouling technologies and improving the operation of aquaculture facilities, and 3) challenges and future directions for advancing our understanding of settlement-mediating functions of biofilms and for applying this knowledge to real-life situations.     

A Novel Metalloproteinase,Almelysin, from a Marine Bacterium,Alteromonas sp. No. 3696: Purification and Characterization

We have discovered a novel metalloproteinase, which has high activity at low temperatures, from the culture supernatant of a marine bacterium. The strain was identified as Alteromonas sp. No. 3696. The metalloproteinase, named almelysin, was purified to homogeneity from the cultured supernatant at 10°C by two column chromatographies. About 20 mg of purified almelysin was obtained from 18.4 liters of the culture supernatant. The molecular mass of almelysin was estimated to be 28 kDa by SDS–PAGE and the isoelectric point was 4.3. The optimum pH for activity of almelysin was pH 8.5–9.0 and 6.5 using casein and (7-methoxycoumarin-4-yl)acetyl(MOCAc)-Pro-Leu-Gly-Leu-(N³-[2,4-dinitrophenyl]-L-2,3-di-aminopropionyl)[A₂pr(Dnp)]-Ala-Arg-NH₂ as substrates, respectively. Almelysin was stable between pH 7.5–8.0 and below 40°C. The optimum temperature for the activity was observed to be 40°C using both casein and MOCAc-Pro-Leu-Gly-Leu-A₂pr(Dnp)-Ala-Arg-NH₂ as substrates. The activity of almelysin was inhibited by such metallo chelators as EDTA and o-phenanthroline, while talopeptin, phosphoramidon, and SMPI, typical metalloproteinase inhibitors, had no effect. Almelysin primarily cleaved the Ala¹⁴-Leu¹⁵ bond and Phe²⁴-Phe²⁵ bond, and secondarily the Tyr¹⁶-Leu¹⁷ bond in oxidized insulin B-chain. However, almelysin could not cleave the His⁵-Leu⁶, His¹⁰-Leu¹¹, and Gly²³-Phe²⁴ bonds, which were cleaved by other metalloproteinases. These results indicate that the substrate specificity of almelysin is different from other metalloproteinases. Interestingly, Alteromonas sp. No. 3696 strain produced another proteinase as well as almelysin at 25°C.     

Mini-Review: Nutrient Cycling in Lakes and Streams: Insights from a Comparative Analysis

Understanding of general ecosystem principles may be improved by comparing disparate ecosystems. We compared nutrient cycling in lakes and streams to evaluate whether contrasts in hydrologic properties lead to different controls and different rates of internal nutrient cycling. Our primary focus was nutrient cycling that results in increased productivity, so we quantified nutrient cycling by defining the recycling ratio (ρ) as the number of times a nutrient molecule is sequestered by producers before export. An analytic model of nutrient cycling predicted that in lakes ρ is governed by the processes that promote the mineralization and retard the sedimentation of particulate-bound nutrients, whereas in streams, ρ is governed by processes that promote the uptake and retard the export of dissolved nutrients. These differences were the consequence of contrast between lakes and streams in the mass-specific export rates (mass exported · standing stock^-1· time^-1) of dissolved and particulate nutrients. Although ρ is calculated from readily measured ecosystem variables, we found very few published data sets that provided the necessary data for a given ecosystem. We calculated and compared ρ in two well-studied P-limited ecosystems, Peter Lake and West Fork Walker Branch (WFWB). When ecosystems were scaled so that water residence time was equal between these two ecosystems, ρ was three orders of magnitude greater in WFWB. However, when we scaled by P residence time, ρ was nearly equal between these two ecosystems. This suggests broad similarities in ρ across ecosystem types when ecosystem boundaries are defined so that turnover times of limiting nutrients are the same. Received 19 November 1998; accepted 6 October 1999.