Translation Initiation Factor eIF3b Contains a Nine-Bladed β-Propeller and Interacts with the 40S Ribosomal Subunit

1. Download : Download high-res image (234KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Eukaryotic Initiation Factor (eIF) 4F Binding to Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus (BYDV) 3′-Untranslated Region Correlates with Translation Efficiency

Eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4F binding to mRNA is the first committed step in cap-dependent protein synthesis. Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) employs a cap-independent mechanism of translation initiation that is mediated by a structural BYDV translation element (BTE) located in the 3′-UTR of its mRNA. eIF4F bound the BTE and a translationally inactive mutant with high affinity, thus questioning the role of eIF4F in translation of BYDV. To examine the effects of eIF4F in BYDV translation initiation, BTE mutants with widely different in vitro translation efficiencies ranging from 5 to 164% compared with WT were studied. Using fluorescence anisotropy to obtain quantitative data, we show 1) the equilibrium binding affinity (complex stability) correlated well with translation efficiency, whereas the “on” rate of binding did not; 2) other unidentified proteins or small molecules in wheat germ extract prevented eIF4F binding to mutant BTE but not WT BTE; 3) BTE mutant-eIF4F interactions were found to be both enthalpically and entropically favorable with an enthalpic contribution of 52–90% to ΔG° at 25 °C, suggesting that hydrogen bonding contributes to stability; and 4) in contrast to cap-dependent and tobacco etch virus internal ribosome entry site interaction with eIF4F, poly(A)-binding protein did not increase eIF4F binding. Further, the eIF4F bound to the 3′ BTE with higher affinity than for either m⁷G cap or tobacco etch virus internal ribosome entry site, suggesting that the 3′ BTE may play a role in sequestering host cell initiation factors and possibly regulating the switch from replication to translation.     

Evolutionary Relationship Between Translation Initiation Factor eIF-2γ and Selenocysteine-Specific Elongation Factor SELB: Change of Function in Translation Factors

Eubacterial and eukaryotic translation initiation systems have very little in common, and therefore the evolutionary events that gave rise to these two disparate systems are difficult to ascertain. One common feature is the presence of initiation, elongation, and release factors belonging to a large GTPase superfamily. One of these initiation factors, the γ subunit of initiation factor 2 (eIF-2γ), is found only in eukaryotes and archaebacteria. We have sequenced eIF-2γ gene fragments from representative diplomonads, parabasalia, and microsporidia and used these new sequences together with new archaebacterial homologues to examine the phylogenetic position of eIF-2γ within the GTPase superfamily. The archaebacterial and eukaryotic eIF-2γ proteins are found to be very closely related, and are in turn related to SELB, the selenocysteine-specific elongation factor from eubacteria. The overall topology of the GTPase tree further suggests that the eIF-2γ/SELB group may represent an ancient subfamily of GTPases that diverged prior to the last common ancestor of extant life. Received: 2 January 1998 / Accepted: 1 June 1998     

Plant Translation Elongation Factor 1Bβ Facilitates Potato Virus X (PVX) Infection and Interacts with PVX Triple Gene Block Protein 1

The eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 (eEF1) has two components: the G-protein eEF1A and the nucleotide exchange factor eEF1B. In plants, eEF1B is itself composed of a structural protein (eEF1Bγ) and two nucleotide exchange subunits (eEF1Bα and eEF1Bβ). To test the effects of elongation factors on virus infection, we isolated eEF1A and eEF1B genes from pepper (Capsicum annuum) and suppressed their homologs in Nicotiana benthamiana using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). The accumulation of a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged Potato virus X (PVX) was significantly reduced in the eEF1Bβ- or eEF1Bɣ-silenced plants as well as in eEF1A-silenced plants. Yeast two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation analyses revealed that eEF1Bα and eEF1Bβ interacted with eEF1A and that eEF1A and eEF1Bβ interacted with triple gene block protein 1 (TGBp1) of PVX. These results suggest that both eEF1A and eEF1Bβ play essential roles in the multiplication of PVX by physically interacting with TGBp1. Furthermore, using eEF1Bβ deletion constructs, we found that both N- (1-64 amino acids) and C-terminal (150-195 amino acids) domains of eEF1Bβ are important for the interaction with PVX TGBp1 and that the C-terminal domain of eEF1Bβ is involved in the interaction with eEF1A. These results suggest that eEF1Bβ could be a potential target for engineering virus-resistant plants.     

A Subunit of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 2α-Phosphatase (CreP/PPP1R15B) Regulates Membrane Traffic

The constitutive reverter of eIF2α phosphorylation (CReP)/PPP1r15B targets the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1c) to phosphorylated eIF2α (p-eIF2α) to promote its dephosphorylation and translation initiation. Here, we report a novel role and mode of action of CReP. We found that CReP regulates uptake of the pore-forming Staphylococcus aureus α-toxin by epithelial cells. This function was independent of PP1c and translation, although p-eIF2α was involved. The latter accumulated at sites of toxin attack and appeared conjointly with α-toxin in early endosomes. CReP localized to membranes, interacted with phosphomimetic eIF2α, and, upon overexpression, induced and decorated a population of intracellular vesicles, characterized by accumulation of N-(lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl)phosphatidylethanolamine (N-Rh-PE), a lipid marker of exosomes and intralumenal vesicles of multivesicular bodies. By truncation analysis, we delineated the CReP vesicle induction/association region, which comprises an amphipathic α-helix and is distinct from the PP1c interaction domain. CReP was also required for exocytosis from erythroleukemia cells and thus appears to play a broader role in membrane traffic. In summary, the mammalian traffic machinery co-opts p-eIF2α and CReP, regulators of translation initiation.     

Translation elongation factor-3 (EF-3): An evolving eukaryotic ribosomal protein?

Fungi appear to be unique in their requirement for a third soluble translation elongation factor. This factor, designated elongation factor 3 (EF-3), exhibits ribosome-dependent ATPase and GTPase activities that are not intrinsic to the fungal ribosome but are nevertheless essential for translation elongation in vivo. The EF-3 polypeptide has been identified in a wide range of fungal species and the gene encoding EF-3 (YEF3) has been isolated from four fungal species (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans, Candida guillermondii, andPneumocystis carinii). Computer-assisted analysis of the predictedS. cerevisiae EF-3 amino acid sequence was used to identify several potential functional domains; two ATP binding/catalytic domains conserved with equivalent domains in members of the ATP-Binding Cassette (ABC) family of proteins, an aminoterminal region showing significant similarity to theE. coli S5 ribosomal protein, and regions of predicted interaction with rRNA, tRNA, and mRNA. Furthermore, EF-3 was also found to display amino acid similarity to myosin proteins whose cellular function is to provide the motive force of muscle. The identification of these regions provides clues to both the evolution and function of EF-3. The predicted functional regions are conserved among all known fungal EF-3 proteins and a recently described homologue encoded by the Chlorella virus CVK2. We propose that EF-3 may play a role in the ribosomal optimization of the accuracy of fungal protein synthesis by altering the conformation and activity of a ribosomal accuracy center, which is equivalent to the S4-S5-S12 ribosomal protein accuracy center domain of theE. coli ribosome. Furthermore, we suggest that EF-3 represents an evolving ribosomal protein with properties analogous to the intrinsic ATPase activities of higher eukaryotic ribosomes, which has wider implications for the evolutionary divergence of fungi from other eukaryotes. Correspondence to: M.F. Tuite     

Coordination of Eukaryotic Translation Elongation Factor 1A (eEF1A) Function in Actin Organization and Translation Elongation by the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor eEF1B��

Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) both shuttles aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) to the ribosome and binds and bundles actin. A single domain of eEF1A is proposed to bind actin, aa-tRNA and the guanine nucleotide exchange factor eEF1Bα. We show that eEF1Bα has the ability to disrupt eEF1A-induced actin organization. Mutational analysis of eEF1Bα F163, which binds in this domain, demonstrates effects on growth, eEF1A binding, nucleotide exchange activity, and cell morphology. These phenotypes can be partially restored by an intragenic W130A mutation. Furthermore, the combination of F163A with the lethal K205A mutation restores viability by drastically reducing eEF1Bα affinity for eEF1A. This also results in a consistent increase in actin bundling and partially corrected morphology. The consequences of the overlapping functions in this eEF1A domain and its unique differences from the bacterial homologs provide a novel function for eEF1Bα to balance the dual roles in actin bundling and protein synthesis.The final step of gene expression takes place at the ribosome as mRNA is translated into protein. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, elongation of the polypeptide chain requires the orchestrated action of three soluble factors. The eukaryotic elongation factor 1 (eEF1)² complex delivers aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) to the empty A-site of the elongating ribosome (1). The eEF1A subunit is a classic G-protein that acts as a “molecular switch” for the active and inactive states based on whether GTP or GDP is bound, respectively (2). Once an anticodon-codon match occurs, the ribosome acts as a GTPase-activating factor to stimulate GTP hydrolysis resulting in the release of inactive GDP-bound eEF1A from the ribosome. Because the intrinsic rate of GDP release from eEF1A is extremely slow (3, 4), a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) complex, eEF1B, is required (5, 6). The yeast S. cerevisiae eEF1B complex contains two subunits, the essential catalytic subunit eEF1Bα (5) and the non-essential subunit eEF1Bγ (7).The co-crystal structures of eEF1A:eEF1Bα C terminus:GDP: Mg²⁺ and eEF1A:eEF1Bα C terminus:GDPNP (8, 9) demonstrated a surprising structural divergence from the bacterial EF-Tu-EF-Ts (10) and mammalian mitochondrial EF-Tu_mt-EF-Ts_mt (11). While the G-proteins have a similar topology and consist of three well-defined domains, a striking difference was observed in binding sites for their GEFs. The C terminus of eEF1Bα interacts with domain I and a distinct pocket of domain II eEF1A, creating two binding interfaces. In contrast, the bacterial counterpart EF-Ts and mammalian mitochondrial EF-Ts_mt, make extensive contacts with domain I and III of EF-Tu and EF-Tu_mt, respectively. The altered binding interface of eEF1Bα to domain II of eEF1A is particularly unexpected given the functions associated with domain II of eEF1A and EF-Tu. The crystal structure of the EF-Tu:GDPNP:Phe-tRNA^Phe complex reveals aa-tRNA binding to EF-Tu requires only minor parts of both domain II and tRNA to sustain stable contacts (12). That eEF1A employs the same aa-tRNA binding site is supported by genetic and biochemical data (13-15). Interestingly, eEF1Bα contacts many domain II eEF1A residues in the region hypothesized to be involved in the binding of the aa-tRNA CCA end (8). Because, the shared binding site of eEF1Bα and aa-tRNA on domain II of eEF1A is significantly different between the eukaryotic and bacterial/mitochondrial systems, eEF1Bα may play a unique function aside from guanine nucleotide release in eukaryotes.In eukaroytes, eEF1A is also an actin-binding and -bundling protein. This noncanonical function of eEF1A was initially observed in Dictyostelium amoebae (16). It is estimated that greater than 60% of Dictyostelium eEF1A is associated with the actin cytoskeleton (17). The eEF1A-actin interaction is conserved among species from yeast to mammals, suggesting the importance of eEF1A for cytoskeleton integrity. Using a unique genetic approach, multiple eEF1A mutations were identified that altered cell growth and morphology, and are deficient in bundling actin in vitro (18, 19). Intriguingly, most mutations localized to domain II, the shared aa-tRNA and eEF1Bα binding site. Previous studies have demonstrated that actin bundling by eEF1A is significantly reduced in the presence of aa-tRNA while eEF1A bound to actin filaments is not in complex with aa-tRNA (20). Therefore, actin and aa-tRNA binding to eEF1A is mutually exclusive. In addition, overexpression of yeast eEF1A or actin-bundling deficient mutants do not affect translation elongation (18, 19, 21), suggesting eEF1A-dependent cytoskeletal organization is independent of its translation elongation function (18, 20). Thus, while aa-tRNA binding to domain II is conserved between EF-Tu and eEF1A, this actin bundling function associated with eEF1A domain II places greater importance on its relationship with the “novel” binding interface between eEF1A domain II and eEF1Bα.Based on this support for an overlapping actin bundling and eEF1Bα binding site in eEF1A domain II, we hypothesize that eEF1Bα modulates the equilibrium between actin and translation functions of eEF1A and is perhaps the result of evolutionary selective pressure to balance the eukaryotic-specific role of eEF1A in actin organization. Here, we present kinetic and biochemical evidence using a F163A mutant of eEF1Bα for the importance of the interactions between domain II of eEF1A and eEF1Bα to prevent eEF1A-dependent actin bundling as well as promoting guanine nucleotide exchange. Furthermore, altered affinities of eEF1Bα mutants for eEF1A support that this complex formation is a determining factor for eEF1A-induced actin organization. Interestingly, the F163A that reduces eEF1A affinity is an intragenic suppressor of the lethal K205A eEF1Bα mutant that displays increased affinity for eEF1A. This, along with a consistent change in the actin bundling correlated with the affinity of eEF1Bα for eEF1A, indicates that eEF1Bα is a balancer, directing eEF1A to translation elongation and away from actin, and alterations in this balance result in detrimental effects on cell growth and eEF1A function.     

Increased Expression of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Translation Elongation Factor 1α Bypasses the Lethality of a Tef5 Null Allele Encoding Elongation Factor 1β

Translation elongation factor 1β (EF-1β) catalyzes the exchange of bound GDP for GTP on EF-1α. The lethality of a null allele of the TEF5 gene encoding EF-1β in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was suppressed by extra copies of the TEF2 gene encoding EF-1α. The strains with tef5::TRP1 suppressed by extra copies of TEF2 were slow growing, cold sensitive, hypersensitive to inhibitors of translation elongation and showed increased phenotypic suppression of +1 frameshift and UAG nonsense mutations. Nine dominant mutant alleles of TEF2 that cause increased suppression of frameshift mutations also suppressed the lethality of tef5::TRP1. Most of the strains in which tef5::TRP1 is suppressed by dominant mutant alleles of TEF2 grew more slowly and were more antibiotic sensitive than strains with tef5::TRP1 suppressed by wild-type TEF2. Two alleles, TEF2-4 and TEF2-10, interact with tef5::TRP1 to produce strains that showed doubling times similar to tef5::TRP1 strains containing extra copies of wild-type TEF2. These strains were less cold sensitive, drug sensitive and correspondingly less efficient suppressors of +1 frameshift mutations. These phenotypes indicate that translation and cell growth are highly sensitive to changes in EF-1α and EF-1β activity.     

Synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-(azolylmethyl)-1H-indoles and 3-(α-azolylbenzyl)-1H-indoles as selective aromatase inhibitors

This present study identifies a number of azolyl-substituted indoles as potent inhibitors of aromatase. In the sub-series of 3-(azolylmethyl)-1H-indoles, four imidazole derivatives and their triazole analogues were tested. Imidazole derivatives 11 and 14 in which the benzyl moiety was substituted by 2-chloro and 4-cyano groups, respectively, were the most active, with IC₅₀ values ranging between 0.054 and 0.050 μM. In the other sub-series, eight 3-(α-azolylbenzyl)-1H-indoles were prepared and tested. Compound 30, the N-ethyl imidazole derivative, proved to be an aromatase inhibitor, showing an IC₅₀ value of 0.052 μM. All target compounds were further evaluated against 17α-hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase to determine their selectivity profile.     

最新病毒研究国外信息(1-3)

根据NS1蛋白是一种多功能促进病毒复制的组分,并有拮抗干扰素的作用,应用基于酵母的测定方法,筛选获得了抑制NS1功能的化合物。这一化合物有反转抑制干扰素mRNA的功能,不仅可作为药物开发,还可用于探讨NS1生物功能（J Virol,2009,83（4）：1881—1891）。     

RNA Modified Uridines VI: Conformations of 3-[3-(S)-Amino-3-Carboxypropyl]Uridine (acp3U) from tRNA and 1-Methyl-3-[3-(S)-Amino-3-Carboxypropyl]Pseudouridine (m1acp3Ψ) from rRNA

Abstract

The conformation of chemically synthesized acp³U is 60& 3′-endo, gauche⁺, whereas that of m¹acp³Ψ is 60& 2′-endo, gauche⁺. We conclude that the difference in conformation probably imparts important local structures to their respective tRNA and rRNA.     

Activation of the Connective Tissue Growth Factor (CTGF)-Transforming Growth Factor β 1 (TGF-β 1) Axis in Hepatitis C Virus-Expressing Hepatocytes

Background

The pro-fibrogenic cytokine connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) plays an important role in the development and progression of fibrosis in many organ systems, including liver. However, its role in the pathogenesis of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced liver fibrosis remains unclear.

Methods

In the present study, we assessed CTGF expression in HCV-infected hepatocytes using replicon cells containing full-length HCV genotype 1 and the infectious HCV clone JFH1 (HCV genotype 2) by real-time PCR, Western blot analysis and confocal microscopy. We evaluated transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) as a key upstream mediator of CTGF production using neutralizing antibodies and shRNAs. We also determined the signaling molecules involved in CTGF production using various immunological techniques.

Results

We demonstrated an enhanced expression of CTGF in two independent models of HCV infection. We also demonstrated that HCV induced CTGF expression in a TGF-β1-dependent manner. Further dissection of the molecular mechanisms revealed that CTGF production was mediated through sequential activation of MAPkinase and Smad-dependent pathways. Finally, to determine whether CTGF regulates fibrosis, we showed that shRNA-mediated knock-down of CTGF resulted in reduced expression of fibrotic markers in HCV replicon cells.

Conclusion

Our studies demonstrate a central role for CTGF expression in HCV-induced liver fibrosis and highlight the potential value of developing CTGF-based anti-fibrotic therapies to counter HCV-induced liver damage.     

Host Subunit of Qβ Replicase is Translation Control Factor i

THE tetrameric phage Qβ replicase is composed of three pre-existing E. coli proteins in addition to the phage coded synthetase^1,2. The host subunits also appear to form part of the f2 replicase³. We have found that the cistron specific factor i⁴ cross reacts immunologically and coelectrophoresis on SDS-acrylamide gel with the largest replicase subunit.     

Comparison of two β-glucosidases for the enzymatic synthesis of β-(1-6)-β-(1-3)-gluco-oligosaccharides

A domain of epiglucan was synthesized by beta-glucosidases. Two beta-glucosidases, an extracellular beta-glucosidase derived from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum grown on xylose, and a commercial lyophilized preparation of beta-glucosidase from Aspergillus niger, were used to synthesize gluco-oligosaccharides from cellobiose and, specially, beta-(1-6) branched beta-(1-3) gluco-oligosaccharides, corresponding to the structure of epiglucan. Gentiobiose, cellotriose, cellotetraose, beta-Glc-(1-3)-beta-Glc-(1-4)-Glc, beta-Glc-(1-6)-beta-Glc-(1-4)-Glc and beta-Glc-(1-6)-beta-Glc-(1-3)-Glc were synthesized from cellobiose by both enzymes. The latter compound was preferentially synthesized by the beta-glycosidase from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Under the best conditions, only 7 g l(-1) of beta-Glc-(1-6)-beta-Glc-(1-3)-Glc was synthesized by the beta-glycosidase from Aspergillus niger compared to 20 g l(-1) synthesized with beta-glycosidase from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.