Synaptic dysfunction,memory deficits and hippocampal atrophy due to ablation of mitochondrial fission in adult forebrain neurons

Well-balanced mitochondrial fission and fusion processes are essential for nervous system development. Loss of function of the main mitochondrial fission mediator, dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), is lethal early during embryonic development or around birth, but the role of mitochondrial fission in adult neurons remains unclear. Here we show that inducible Drp1 ablation in neurons of the adult mouse forebrain results in progressive, neuronal subtype-specific alterations of mitochondrial morphology in the hippocampus that are marginally responsive to antioxidant treatment. Furthermore, DRP1 loss affects synaptic transmission and memory function. Although these changes culminate in hippocampal atrophy, they are not sufficient to cause neuronal cell death within 10 weeks of genetic Drp1 ablation. Collectively, our in vivo observations clarify the role of mitochondrial fission in neurons, demonstrating that Drp1 ablation in adult forebrain neurons compromises critical neuronal functions without causing overt neurodegeneration.In addition to their crucial importance in energy conversion, mitochondria serve many other housekeeping functions, including calcium buffering, amino-acid and steroid biosynthesis as well as fatty acids beta-oxidation and regulation of cell death. During the past decade, it has become increasingly clear that processes regulating mitochondrial morphology and ultrastructure are influenced by specific cellular requirements upon which mitochondria, in a precisely regulated manner, undergo fusion and division events.¹ Maintaining this balance is especially important for highly energy-consuming, polarized cells such as neurons, where single organellar units sprouting from the mitochondrial network are transported along the cytoskeleton into dendrites and spines to meet local energy requirements.² In addition, elaborate quality-control mechanisms also rely on mitochondrial dynamics: whereas defective organelles are sequestered by fission, enabling their removal from the mitochondrial network,^{3, 4} fusion supports qualitative homogeneity of the syncytium through complementation.⁵Mitochondrial fusion and fission are mediated by large GTPases of the dynamin superfamily.⁶ The outer mitochondrial membrane mitofusins 1 (MFN1) and 2 (MFN2) tether mitochondrial membranes by homodimer or heterodimer formation,⁷ thereby initiating fusion of the organelles, a process that also involves the inner mitochondrial membrane-associated GTPase Optic Atrophy 1.⁸ In addition, MFN2 also mediates contacts between mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum.⁹ The only known mammalian mitochondrial fission protein, Dynamin-Related Protein 1 (Drp1), translocates upon dephosphorylation by calcineurin¹⁰ to fission sites where it binds to mitochondrial fission factor.¹¹ Drp1 translocation is preceded by ER membranes wrapping around mitochondria to constrict the organelles,¹² thereby facilitating the formation of multimeric Drp1 complexes that, upon GTP hydrolysis, further tighten to complete the process of mitochondrial fission.¹³Genetic evidence in mice and humans indicates that mitochondrial dynamics are crucially important in neurons: in humans, a sporadic dominant-negative DRP1 mutation caused a lethal syndromic defect with abnormal brain development;¹⁴ similarly, constitutive Drp1 knockout in the mouse brain leads to lethal neurodevelopmental defects.^{15, 16} Although the crucial role of Drp1 during brain development is undisputed, studies on Drp1 function in postmitotic (adult) neurons are scarce; likewise, Drp1 ablation studies in primary cultures have so far failed to yield a conclusive picture. In vitro, Drp1 ablation is reported to lead to a super-elongated neuroprotective^{17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24} or an aggregated mitochondrial phenotype associated with neurodegeneration.^{15, 16, 25, 26, 27} These discrepancies are probably due to different experimental conditions: neuronal health is indeed influenced by the onset and duration of Drp1 inhibition, which varies considerably among the cited reports,²⁸ and different types of neuronal cultures studied display different sensitivity to Drp1 inhibition. In vivo, Drp1 ablation in Purkinje cells results in oxidative stress and neurodegeneration,²⁹ demonstrating that Drp1 is essential for postmitotic neurons'' health. In contrast, transient pharmacological Drp1 inhibition is neuroprotective in several mouse ischemia models, indicating that temporarily blocking mitochondrial fission holds therapeutic potential.^{30, 31, 32}To elucidate the consequences of blocked mitochondrial fission in the central nervous system in vivo, we bypassed the critical role of Drp1 during brain development by generating Drp1^flx/flx mice¹⁵ expressing tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase under the control of the CaMKIIα promoter.³³ Upon induced Drp1 deletion in postmitotic adult mouse forebrain neurons, mice develop progressive, neuronal subtype-specific alterations in mitochondrial shape and distribution in the absence of overt neurodegeneration. In addition, respiratory capacity, ATP content, synaptic reserve pool vesicle recruitment as well as spatial working memory are impaired, demonstrating that severely dysregulated mitochondrial dynamics can compromise critical neuronal functions in vivo without causing neuronal cell death.     

miR-361-regulated prohibitin inhibits mitochondrial fission and apoptosis and protects heart from ischemia injury

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Emerging evidences suggest that the abnormal mitochondrial fission participates in pathogenesis of cardiac diseases, including myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure. However, the molecular components regulating mitochondrial network in the heart remain largely unidentified. Here we report that miR-361 and prohibitin 1 (PHB1) constitute an axis that regulates mitochondrial fission and apoptosis. The results show that PHB1 attenuates mitochondrial fission and apoptosis in response to hydrogen peroxide treatment in cardiomyocytes. Cardiac-specific PHB1 transgenic mice show reduced mitochondrial fission and myocardial infarction sizes after myocardial infarction surgery. MiR-361 is responsible for the dysfunction of PHB1 and suppresses the translation of PHB1. Knockdown of miR-361 reduces mitochondrial fission and apoptosis in vivo and in vitro. MiR-361 cardiac-specific transgenic mice represent elevated mitochondrial fission and myocardial infarction sizes upon myocardial ischemia injury. This study identifies a novel signaling pathway composed of miR-361 and PHB1 that regulates mitochondrial fission program and apoptosis. This discovery will shed new light on the therapy of myocardial infarction and heart failure.The heart drives the blood flow in the body and it has a large requirement of energy. Mitochondria meet the high energy demand of the heart by consistently providing large amounts of ATP through oxidative phosphorylation. Thus, mitochondrial malfunction is tightly related to cardiac diseases and contributes to cardiomyocyte injury, cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Mitochondria morphology is also associated with the function. Mitochondria constantly undergo fission and fusion. Fission leads to the formation of small round mitochondria and promotes cell apoptosis,^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} whereas fusion results in mitochondria elongation and have a protective role in cardiomyocytes maintenance.⁸ The above findings strongly suggest that mitochondrial fission and fusion machinery is important for cardiac function. In addition, unveiling the mechanism of mitochondrial network regulation will provide a novel therapeutic strategy for heart failure.The mitochondrial prohibitin complex is a macromolecular structure at the inner mitochondrial membrane that is composed of prohibitin 1 (PHB1) and prohibitin 2 subunits.⁹ These two proteins comprise an evolutionary conserved and ubiquitously expressed family of membrane proteins and are implicated in several important cellular processes such as mitochondrial biogenesis and function, cell proliferation, replicative senescence, and cell death.^{10, 11} The first mammalian PHB1 was identified as a potential tumor suppressor with anti-proliferative activity.¹² Recent findings suggest that PHB1 has an important role in regulating mitochondrial morphology. Loss of PHB1 results in accumulation of fragmented mitochondria in MEFs and HeLa cells.^{13, 14} However, it is not yet clear whether PHB1 participates in the regulation of mitochondrial dynamics in cardiomyocytes.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of short single-stranded non-coding endogenous RNAs and act as negative regulators of gene expression by inhibiting mRNA translation or promoting mRNA degradation.^{15, 16} Although the function of miRNAs has been widely studied in apoptosis, development, differentiation and proliferation, few works have been focused on miRNAs in the mitochondrial network regulation. It has been reported that miR-30b targets to p53 and inhibits mitochondrial fission.¹⁷ In addition, other miRNAs also affect the function of mitochondria by targeting to mitochondrial calcium uniporter.¹⁸ The study of miRNA function in mitochondria may shed new light on the machinery that underlies mitochondrial regulation.This study unveils that PHB1 is involved in the regulation of mitochondrial network in cardiomyocytes. PHB1 inhibits mitochondrial fission and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. In addition, PHB1 transgenic mice exhibit a reduced myocardial infarction sizes upon myocardial ischemia injury in vivo. In searching for the mechanism by which PHB1 is downregulated under pathologic condition, we identify miR-361 participates in the suppression of PHB1 translation. MiR-361 initiates mitochondrial fission, apoptosis and myocardial infarction through downregulating PHB1. Our results reveal a novel mitochondrial regulating model, which is composed of miR-361 and PHB1. Modulation of their levels may represent a novel approach for interventional treatment of myocardial infarction and heart failure.     

Dynamin-related protein 1 is required for normal mitochondrial bioenergetic and synaptic function in CA1 hippocampal neurons

Disrupting particular mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins leads to the death of specific neuronal populations; however, the normal functions of mitochondrial fission in neurons are poorly understood, especially in vivo, which limits the understanding of mitochondrial changes in disease. Altered activity of the central mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) may contribute to the pathophysiology of several neurologic diseases. To study Drp1 in a neuronal population affected by Alzheimer''s disease (AD), stroke, and seizure disorders, we postnatally deleted Drp1 from CA1 and other forebrain neurons in mice (CamKII-Cre, Drp1^lox/lox (Drp1cKO)). Although most CA1 neurons survived for more than 1 year, their synaptic transmission was impaired, and Drp1cKO mice had impaired memory. In Drp1cKO cell bodies, we observed marked mitochondrial swelling but no change in the number of mitochondria in individual synaptic terminals. Using ATP FRET sensors, we found that cultured neurons lacking Drp1 (Drp1KO) could not maintain normal levels of mitochondrial-derived ATP when energy consumption was increased by neural activity. These deficits occurred specifically at the nerve terminal, but not the cell body, and were sufficient to impair synaptic vesicle cycling. Although Drp1KO increased the distance between axonal mitochondria, mitochondrial-derived ATP still decreased similarly in Drp1KO boutons with and without mitochondria. This indicates that mitochondrial-derived ATP is rapidly dispersed in Drp1KO axons, and that the deficits in axonal bioenergetics and function are not caused by regional energy gradients. Instead, loss of Drp1 compromises the intrinsic bioenergetic function of axonal mitochondria, thus revealing a mechanism by which disrupting mitochondrial dynamics can cause dysfunction of axons.Mitochondrial dynamics – the balance between mitochondrial fission and fusion – regulates mitochondrial quality control by segregating poorly functioning mitochondria for degradation while mixing the contents of healthy mitochondria.^{1, 2} In neurons, fission uniquely facilitates movement of mitochondria down narrow distal axons.^{3, 4} Disruptions of this movement, and of other neuron-specific functions, may explain why systemic mutations in mitochondrial fusion and fission proteins specifically cause death of neurons. However, the roles and requirements of these proteins also differ between neuronal types.¹ For example, mutations in the fusion protein optic atrophy 1 cause degeneration of retinal ganglion neurons,⁵ and mutations in the fusion protein mitofusin-2 or the fission protein ganglioside-induced differentiation-associated protein 1 cause peripheral neuropathy (Charcot-Marie-Tooth types 2A and 4A^{6, 7}).There are several potential reasons why specific neurons have unique requirements for fission–fusion proteins. First, the functions of these proteins may be more critical in vulnerable neuronal populations. Recently, we showed that most midbrain DA neurons are uniquely vulnerable to loss of the central mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1),⁴ a GTPase recruited to fission sites on the outer mitochondrial membrane.¹ Loss of Drp1 depletes axonal mitochondria, which is followed by axonal degeneration and neuronal death. However, a subpopulation of midbrain DA neurons survive, despite losing their axonal mitochondria, suggesting that they have lower needs for energy or other mitochondrial functions in their axons.⁴ Do unique requirements for mitochondrial dynamics underlie differential neuronal vulnerability? Do resistant neurons compensate with other fission or fusion mechanisms? Do the functions of fission differ between neurons? Notably, Drp1 may also have mitochondria-independent functions in synaptic vesicle release.⁸ Addressing these issues could help elucidate the physiological functions of mitochondrial dynamics in the nervous system and reveal how shifts in the fission–fusion balance contribute to selective neuronal death in neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington''s disease, Parkinson''s disease and Alzheimer''s disease (AD),^{1, 4} and in other neurologic disorders, including stroke and epilepsy.^{9, 10, 11}To understand mitochondrial dynamics, it would be useful to know why mitochondrial fission is needed in the nervous system in the first place, and how loss of fission affects mitochondrial functions in specific cell types. Notably, Drp1 knockout did not change respiration or ATP levels in resuspended mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs),^{12, 13} indicating that mitochondrial fission is not required for respiration in these cells. However, neuronal respiration may be more sensitive to Drp1 loss. Indeed, Drp1 loss markedly decreased the number of mitochondria in axons and the cell body in midbrain DA neurons in vivo,⁴ and reduced staining of complex I and IV activity in cerebellar neurons in vivo.¹⁴ However, it is unclear whether these changes translate into decreased ATP levels in neurons and, if so, whether this decrease compromises neuronal function. Furthermore, Drp1 loss caused cell death in cerebellar and most midbrain DA neurons,^{4, 14} which challenges our ability to dissociate the specific effects of Drp1 loss on mitochondrial function from other non-specific changes that accompany cell death.To learn how disrupting mitochondrial fission contributes to selective neurodegeneration, we studied the function of Drp1 in CA1 hippocampal neurons and its role in mitochondrial bioenergetics. Surprisingly, despite losing Drp1, most CA1 neurons survived for more than 1 year in vivo, although their function was compromised, leading to deficits in synaptic transmission and memory. To begin to understand how loss of Drp1 causes neuronal dysfunction, we examined the role of Drp1 in mitochondrial bioenergetics. We found that Drp1 is required to maintain normal mitochondrial-derived ATP levels specifically in axons (but not the cell body), and that the loss of this function is unrelated to the distribution of mitochondria within axons.     

Muscle-specific Drp1 overexpression impairs skeletal muscle growth via translational attenuation

Mitochondrial fission and fusion are essential processes in the maintenance of the skeletal muscle function. The contribution of these processes to muscle development has not been properly investigated in vivo because of the early lethality of the models generated so far. To define the role of mitochondrial fission in muscle development and repair, we have generated a transgenic mouse line that overexpresses the fission-inducing protein Drp1 specifically in skeletal muscle. These mice displayed a drastic impairment in postnatal muscle growth, with reorganisation of the mitochondrial network and reduction of mtDNA quantity, without the deficiency of mitochondrial bioenergetics. Importantly we found that Drp1 overexpression activates the stress-induced PKR/eIF2α/Fgf21 pathway thus leading to an attenuated protein synthesis and downregulation of the growth hormone pathway. These results reveal for the first time how mitochondrial network dynamics influence muscle growth and shed light on aspects of muscle physiology relevant in human muscle pathologies.Skeletal muscle growth and mitochondrial metabolism are intimately linked. In myogenic precursor cells, mitochondrial mass, mtDNA copy number and mitochondrial respiration increase after the onset of myogenic differentiation;^{1, 2} furthermore, postnatal development of fast-twitch muscle is accompanied by an increase in mtDNA copy number³ and muscle regeneration is impaired when mitochondrial protein synthesis is inhibited with chloramphenicol.^{2, 4} These observations suggest that a change in the mitochondrial metabolism is necessary for proper muscle development. During myogenesis and postnatal development, the shape of mitochondria is also remodelled:^{3, 5, 6} in an elegant mouse model with fluorescent mitochondria it was shown that in young mice mitochondria of the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle are shaped as elongated tubules oriented along the long axis of the muscle fibre, whereas in adult mice mitochondria are punctuated and organised into doublets.¹Mitochondrial network morphology is controlled by the balance between fusion and fission. In mammals, three large GTPases are involved in mitochondrial fusion: mitofusins 1 and 2 (Mfn1 and Mfn2) participate in the early steps of mitochondrial outer-membrane fusion, whereas the optic atrophy 1 protein (Opa1) is essential for inner-membrane fusion.⁷ Mitochondrial fission is mediated by the evolutionarily conserved dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1).⁸ In humans, mutations in Mfn2 and Opa1 cause two neurodegenerative diseases – Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 2 A and dominant optic atrophy, respectively – and a mutation in Drp1 has been linked to neonatal lethality with multisystem failure.^{9, 10, 11} Moreover, Drp1 expression was reported to increase in a model of cachexia¹² and to contribute to muscle insulin resistance in obese and type 2 diabetic mice.^{13, 14}The importance of mitochondrial dynamics in muscle physiology has become increasingly clear. In skeletal muscle, mitochondria undergo fusion to share matrix content in order to support excitation–contraction coupling.¹⁵ The mitochondrial network is remodelled in atrophic conditions, and denervation and expression of fission machinery in adult myofibres is sufficient to cause muscle wasting.¹⁶ Moreover, mice lacking Mfn1 and 2 in fast-twitch muscles exhibit drastic growth defects and muscle atrophy before dying at 6–8 weeks of age.³ Animal models in which mitochondrial fission proteins are manipulated during skeletal muscle development are not yet available, but in vitro data demonstrate that regulation of Drp1 is critical for myogenesis: myoblasts differentiation requires nitric oxide-dependent inhibition of Drp1⁶ and pharmacological inhibition of Drp1 activity impairs myogenic differentiation.¹⁷To explore in vivo the role of Drp1 and mitochondrial shape in the developing muscle, we generated a transgenic mouse line specifically overexpressing Drp1 in skeletal muscle during myogenesis. These mice display strong impairments in mitochondrial network shape and in muscle growth. We show that the mechanism responsible for the growth defect involves inhibition of protein synthesis and activation of the Atf4 pathway.     

The LRRK2 inhibitor GSK2578215A induces protective autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells: involvement of Drp-1-mediated mitochondrial fission and mitochondrial-derived ROS signaling

Mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene have been associated with Parkinson''s disease, and its inhibition opens potential new therapeutic options. Among the drug inhibitors of both wild-type and mutant LRRK2 forms is the 2-arylmethyloxy-5-subtitutent-N-arylbenzamide GSK257815A. Using the well-established dopaminergic cell culture model SH-SY5Y, we have investigated the effects of GSK2578215A on crucial neurodegenerative features such as mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy. GSK2578215A induces mitochondrial fragmentation of an early step preceding autophagy. This increase in autophagosome results from inhibition of fusion rather than increases in synthesis. The observed effects were shared with LRRK2-IN-1, a well-described, structurally distinct kinase inhibitor compound or when knocking down LRRK2 expression using siRNA. Studies using the drug mitochondrial division inhibitor 1 indicated that translocation of the dynamin-related protein-1 has a relevant role in this process. In addition, autophagic inhibitors revealed the participation of autophagy as a cytoprotective response by removing damaged mitochondria. GSK2578215A induced oxidative stress as evidenced by the accumulation of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in SH-SY5Y cells. The mitochondrial-targeted reactive oxygen species scavenger MitoQ positioned these species as second messengers between mitochondrial morphologic alterations and autophagy. Altogether, our results demonstrated the relevance of LRRK2 in mitochondrial-activated pathways mediating in autophagy and cell fate, crucial features in neurodegenerative diseases.Nowadays, Parkinson''s disease (PD) constitutes the main motor disorder and the second neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer''s disease. Etiology of PD remains unknown, but both environmental and genetic factors have been implicated. Among the genes associated with PD is the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2, PARK8, OMIM 607060) encoding gene encoded by PARK8. Indeed, LRRK2 mutations have been described in a substantial number of idiopathic late-onset PD patients without a known family history of the disease.^{1, 2, 3}The physiologic function remains unknown. It localizes in the cytosol as well as in specific membrane subdomains, including mitochondria, autophagosomes and autolysosomes,⁴ and interacts with a whole array of proteins, including both α- and β-tubulin,^{5, 6} tau,⁷ α-synuclein⁸ and F-actin.⁹ LRRK2 gene mutations, including the most common G2019S,³ are associated with increases in toxic putative kinase activity.^{1, 10} LRRK2 overexpression is toxic to cultured cells,^{11, 12} and LRRK2 loss did not cause neurodegenerative changes (for a review see Tong and Shen¹³). However, LRRK2 transgenic mice lack obvious PD-like behavioral phenotypes.¹⁴ LRRK2-associated PD patients show degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra.¹⁵ Data from our own group and others have associated mitochondrial apoptotical pathways with PD,^{16, 17, 18} and, in this context, LRRK2 mutant-mediated toxicity could be due to mitochondria-dependent apoptosis.¹⁹ There is considerable evidence for impaired mitochondrial function and morphology in both early-onset, autosomal recessive inherited PD and late-onset sporadic PD.Mitochondrial dynamics include several mechanisms, such as fission, fusion and mitophagy.^{20, 21} Altered fission/fusion dynamics might be a common pathogenic pathway of neurodegenerative diseases. It is well documented that mitochondrial dynamics constitute a relevant issue in some experimental neurodegenerative models.^{20, 22, 23, 24, 25} Mitochondrial dynamics is tightly regulated by cellular pathways including those participated by the dynamin-related protein-1 (Drp1). Drp1 mostly locates in the cytoplasm, but is stimulated after fission stimuli to migrate to the mitochondria. Once there, Drp1 forms ring-like structures, which wrap around the scission site to constrict the mitochondrial membrane resulting in mitochondrial fission.^{26, 27} Interestingly, a functional interaction between PD-associated LRRK2 and members of the dynamin GTPase superfamily has been described.²⁸Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is an active cellular response, which functions in the intracellular degradation system of cellular debris such as damaged organelles. Whether autophagy promotes cell death or enhances survival is still controversial.^{29, 30} It requires the formation of autophagosomes where cellular content is to be degraded by the action of lysosomal enzymatic content. Autophagosome formation is regulated by an orderly action of >30 autophagy-related (Atg) proteins. Among them is the microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3), a homolog of Apg8p, which is essential for autophagy in yeast and is associated with autophagosome membranes.³¹ Interestingly, these vesicles are mostly highly mobile in the cytoplasm.³² Wild-type and mutant LRRK2 expression has been related to autophagy.^{4, 33, 34, 35, 36} Reactive oxygen species (ROS) function as relevant second messengers after several stimuli, including mitochondrial disruption. Exacerbated ROS increases might result in overactivation of antioxidant systems and yield harmful oxidative stress. Among oxidative stress hallmarks is the accumulation of α,β-unsaturated hydroxyalkenal 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), whose accumulation has been reported in PD post-mortem patient brains,^{37, 38} thus giving a significant relevance to ROS in the pathogenesis of PD.All these results indicate LRRK2 as a promising pharmacologic target in PD treatment.³⁹ Several LRRK2 inhibitor drugs have been synthetized, such as the potent and highly selective 2-arylmethyloxy-5-substitutent-N-arylbenzamide (GSK2578215A). GSK2578215A exhibits biochemical IC₅₀s of 10.9 nM against wild-type LRRK2, and possesses a high ratio of brain to plasma distribution.⁴⁰ This study provides key insights into the mechanisms downstream of LRRK2 inhibition, and spreads light onto an underexplored, yet potentially tractable therapeutic target for treating LRRK2-associated PD. We demonstrate how inhibition of this kinase results in the activation of cellular death pathways such as the mitochondrial fission machinery, and how cells reply by activating a protective autophagic response. Our results show the presence of oxidative stress hallmarks, thus pointing to a key function for ROS, placed downstream of mitochondrial fission.     

Intramitochondrial recruitment of endolysosomes mediates Smac degradation and constitutes a novel intrinsic apoptosis antagonizing function of XIAP E3 ligase

Intrinsic apoptosis involves BH3-only protein activation of Bax/Bak-mediated mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). Consequently, cytochrome c is released from the mitochondria to activate caspases, and Smac (second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases) to inhibit XIAP-mediated caspase suppression. Dysfunctional mitochondria can be targeted for lysosomal degradation via autophagy (mitophagy), or directly through mitochondria-derived vesicle transport. However, the extent of autophagy and lysosomal interactions with apoptotic mitochondria remains largely unknown. We describe here a novel pathway of endolysosomal processing of mitochondria, activated in response to canonical BH3-only proteins and mitochondrial depolarization. We report that expression of canonical BH3-only proteins, tBid, Bim_EL, Bik, Bad, and mitophagy receptor mutants of atypical BH3-only proteins, Bnip3 and Bnip3L/Nix, leads to prominent relocalization of endolysosomes into inner mitochondrial compartments, in a manner independent of mitophagy. As an upstream regulator, we identified the XIAP E3 ligase. In response to mitochondrial depolarization, XIAP actuates Bax-mediated MOMP, even in the absence of BH3-only protein signaling. Subsequently, in an E3 ligase-dependent manner, XIAP rapidly localizes inside all the mitochondria, and XIAP-mediated mitochondrial ubiquitylation catalyses interactions of Rab membrane targeting components Rabex-5 and Rep-1 (RFP-tagged Rab escort protein-1), and Rab5- and Rab7-positive endolysosomes, at and within mitochondrial membrane compartments. While XIAP-mediated MOMP permits delayed cytochrome c release, within the mitochondria XIAP selectively signals lysosome- and proteasome-associated degradation of its inhibitor Smac. These findings suggest a general mechanism to lower the mitochondrial apoptotic potential via intramitochondrial degradation of Smac.The intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is required for efficient chemotherapeutic killing of cancer cells,¹ and is initiated through BH3-only protein activation of Bax/Bak-mediated mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). MOMP releases cytochrome c to activate effector caspases.² Conversely, inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family members suppress initiator and effector caspases via direct binding and E3 ligase activities.^{3, 4, 5} Consequently, MOMP-induced release of Smac (second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases) from the mitochondria, to inhibit XIAP (X-chromosome-linked IAP)-mediated caspase suppression, can be required for apoptosis.⁶Autophagy, a lysosomal degradative mechanism undergoing extensive crosstalk with cell death and survival pathways,⁷ degrades damaged mitochondria in a process termed mitophagy.^{8, 9} Damaged mitochondria are targeted by lysosomal degradation through the recruitment of autophagy receptors to the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM),⁸ or via delivery of mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs) directly to the lysosome.¹⁰ The E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin targets and ubiquitylates mitochondria, mediating both MDV degradation¹¹ and autophagy receptor-dependent mitophagy.^{12, 13} Alternatively, Fundc1¹⁴ and atypical BH3-only Nip family proteins Bnip3 and Bnip3L/Nix localize to the OMM and act as mitophagy receptors via their LC3-interacting region (LIR).^{15, 16, 17, 18} While targeting of damaged mitochondria suggests that mitophagy may counter apoptotic mitochondria, mitophagy occurs progressively over days,^{12, 14, 16, 17, 19} a rate that is likely insufficient to alter intracellular propagation of mitochondrial apoptosis, which can occur within minutes.^{20, 21} Indeed, Bnip3- and Fundc1-induced mitophagy have no direct effect on apoptosis,^{14, 18} and we determined that Bnip3-mediated mitophagy was cytoprotective if activated before apoptosis.¹⁷ While MDV delivery of mitochondria to lysosomes operates at a higher rate, minutes to hours,¹⁰ this process is regulated by Parkin and restricted to specific mitochondrial components.¹¹ Overall, for most intrinsic apoptosis scenarios it remains unknown whether lysosomal processing of mitochondria influences their capacity to activate or enhance apoptosis.Here, we used high-resolution imaging to evaluate the behavior of apoptosis, autophagy, lysosomal and ubiquitylation pathways in response to canonical (tBid, Bim_EL, Bik, Bad) and atypical (Bnip3, Bnip3L/Nix) BH3-only protein expression. We report that, in parallel to intrinsic apoptosis signaling, canonical BH3-only proteins induce the recruitment of endolysosomal machinery, in the absence of mitophagy. We determined that mitochondrial depolarization rapidly translocates the caspase inhibitor XIAP to the mitochondria. There, XIAP actuates MOMP within all mitochondria, concomitant with ubiquitylation at the OMM and inside OMM-bound regions, and triggers ubiquitin-dependent recruitment of Rab5 and its binding partners, as well as late endosomes into the mitochondria. Consequently, in a manner dependent on lysosome- and proteasome-activities, XIAP degrades its inhibitor Smac. We propose that in response to bioenergetic stress, the functional integration between lysosomes and mitochondria, mediated by XIAP and independent of autophagy, offers a novel mechanism to modulate mitochondrial apoptosis.     

Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect against Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death

Evidence indicates that nitrosative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction participate in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). Amyloid beta (Aβ) and peroxynitrite induce mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death by abnormal activation of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), a large GTPase that regulates mitochondrial fission. The exact mechanisms of mitochondrial fragmentation and DRP1 overactivation in AD remain unknown; however, DRP1 serine 616 (S616) phosphorylation is likely involved. Although it is clear that nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a role in AD, effective antioxidant therapies are lacking. Cerium oxide nanoparticles, or nanoceria, switch between their Ce³⁺ and Ce⁴⁺ states and are able to scavenge superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide and peroxynitrite. Therefore, nanoceria might protect against neurodegeneration. Here we report that nanoceria are internalized by neurons and accumulate at the mitochondrial outer membrane and plasma membrane. Furthermore, nanoceria reduce levels of reactive nitrogen species and protein tyrosine nitration in neurons exposed to peroxynitrite. Importantly, nanoceria reduce endogenous peroxynitrite and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation, DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation and neuronal cell death.Nitric oxide (NO) is a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator required for learning and memory.¹ NO is generated by NO synthases, a group of enzymes that produce NO from L-arginine. In addition to its normal role in physiology, NO is implicated in pathophysiology. When overproduced, NO combines with superoxide anions (O₂·⁻), byproducts of aerobic metabolism and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, to form peroxynitrite anions (ONOO⁻) that are highly reactive and neurotoxic. Accumulation of these reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), known as oxidative and nitrosative stress, respectively, is a common feature of aging, neurodegeneration and Alzheimer''s disease (AD).¹Nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a critical role in the etiology and pathogenesis of AD.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Peroxynitrite is implicated in the formation of the two hallmarks of AD, Aβ aggregates and neurofibrillary tangles containing hyperphosphorylated Tau protein.^{1, 4, 7} In addition, peroxynitrite promotes the nitrotyrosination of presenilin 1, the catalytic subunit of the γ-secretase complex, which shifts production of Aβ to amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and increases the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, ultimately resulting in an increased propensity for aggregation and neurotoxicity.⁵ Furthermore, nitration of Aβ tyrosine 10 enhances its aggregation.⁶ Peroxynitrite can also modify enzymes, such as triosephosphate isomerase,⁴ and activate kinases, including Jun amino-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, which enhance neuronal cell death.^{8, 9} Moreover, peroxynitrite can trigger the release of free metals such as Zn²⁺ from intracellular stores with consequent inhibition of mitochondrial function and enhancement of neuronal cell death.^{10, 11, 12} Finally, peroxynitrite can irreversibly inhibit complexes I and IV of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.^{11, 13}Because mitochondria have a critical role in neurons as energy producers to fuel vital processes such as synaptic transmission and axonal transport,¹⁴ and mitochondrial dysfunction is a well-documented and early event in AD,¹⁵ it is important to consider how peroxynitrite and nitrosative stress affect mitochondria. Although the ultimate cause of mitochondrial dysfunction in AD remains unclear, an imbalance in mitochondrial fission and fusion is one possibility.^{1, 14, 16, 17, 18} Notably, peroxynitrite, N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation and Aβ can induce mitochondrial fragmentation by activating mitochondrial fission and/or inhibiting fusion.¹⁶ Mitochondrial fission and fusion is regulated by large GTPases of the dynamin family, including dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) that is required for mitochondrial division,¹⁹ and inhibition of mitochondrial division by overexpression of the GTPase-defective DRP1^K38A mutant provides protection against peroxynitrite-, NMDA- and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.¹⁶The exact mechanism of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation remains unclear. A recent report suggested that S-nitrosylation of DRP1 at cysteine 644 increases DRP1 activity and is the cause of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation in AD;²⁰ however, the work remains controversial, suggesting that alternative pathways might be involved.²¹ For example, peroxynitrite also causes rapid DRP1 S616 phosphorylation that promotes its translocation to mitochondria and organelle division.^{21, 22} In mitotic cells, DRP1 S616 phosphorylation is mediated by Cdk1/cyclinB1 and synchronizes mitochondrial division with cell division.²³ Interestingly, DRP1 is S616 hyperphosphorylated in AD brains, suggesting that this event might contribute to mitochondrial fragmentation in the disease.^{21, 22} A recent report indicates that Cdk5/p35 is responsible for DRP1 S616 phosphorylation,²⁴ and notably aberrant Cdk5/p35/p25 signaling is associated with AD pathogenesis.²⁵ Thus, we explored here the possible role of DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation in Aβ- and peroxynitrite-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation.Under normal conditions, accumulated mitochondrial superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) can be neutralized by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase. Nitrosative stress in aging and AD might be explained by a loss of antioxidant enzymes. Previous studies suggest that expression of SOD subtypes is decreased in the human AD brain.^{26, 27} Furthermore, SOD1 deletion in a mouse model of AD increased the burden of amyloid plaques.²⁶ By contrast, overexpression of SOD2 in a mouse model of AD decreased the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and alleviated memory deficits.^{28, 29} There is currently a lack of antioxidants that can effectively quench superoxide anions, H₂O₂ or peroxynitrite and provide lasting effects. Cerium is a rare earth element and cerium oxide (CeO₂) nanoparticles, or nanoceria, shuttle between their 3+ or 4+ states. Oxidation of Ce⁴⁺ to Ce³⁺ causes oxygen vacancies and defects on the surface of the crystalline lattice structure of the nanoparticles, generating a cage for redox reactions to occur.³⁰ Accordingly, nanoceria mimic the catalytic activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD^{31, 32} and catalase,³³ and are able to neutralize peroxynitrite.³⁴ Because of these antioxidant properties, we hypothesized that nanoceria could detoxify peroxynitrite and protect against Aβ-induced DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation, mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.     

Granzyme B-induced mitochondrial ROS are required for apoptosis

Caspases and the cytotoxic lymphocyte protease granzyme B (GB) induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation, loss of transmembrane potential and mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). Whether ROS are required for GB-mediated apoptosis and how GB induces ROS is unclear. Here, we found that GB induces cell death in an ROS-dependent manner, independently of caspases and MOMP. GB triggers ROS increase in target cell by directly attacking the mitochondria to cleave NDUFV1, NDUFS1 and NDUFS2 subunits of the NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase complex I inside mitochondria. This leads to mitocentric ROS production, loss of complex I and III activity, disorganization of the respiratory chain, impaired mitochondrial respiration and loss of the mitochondrial cristae junctions. Furthermore, we have also found that GB-induced mitocentric ROS are necessary for optimal apoptogenic factor release, rapid DNA fragmentation and lysosomal rupture. Interestingly, scavenging the ROS delays and reduces many of the features of GB-induced death. Consequently, GB-induced ROS significantly promote apoptosis.To induce cell death, human granzyme B (GB) activates effector caspase-3 or acts directly on key caspase substrates, such as the proapoptotic BH3 only Bcl-2 family member Bid, inhibitor of caspase-activated DNase (ICAD), poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1), lamin B, nuclear mitotic apparatus protein 1 (NUMA1), catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) and tubulin.^{1, 2, 3} Consequently, caspase inhibitors have little effect on human GB-mediated cell death and DNA fragmentation.² GB causes reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, dissipation of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨm) and MOMP, which leads to the release of apoptogenic factors such as cytochrome c (Cyt c), HtrA2/Omi, endonuclease G (Endo G), Smac/Diablo and apoptosis-inducing factor, from the mitochondrial intermembrane space to the cytosol.^{4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11} Interestingly, cells deficient for Bid, Bax and Bak are still sensitive to human GB-induced cell death,^{5, 11, 12, 13} suggesting that human GB targets the mitochondria in another way that needs to be characterized. Altogether, much attention has been focused on the importance of MOMP in the execution of GB-mediated cell death, leaving unclear whether ROS production is a bystander effect or essential to the execution of GB-induced apoptosis. The mitochondrial NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase complex I is a key determinant in steady-state ROS production. This 1 MDa complex, composed of 44 subunits,¹⁴ couples the transfer of two electrons from NADH to ubiquinone with the translocation of four protons to generate the ΔΨm. The importance of ROS has been previously demonstrated for caspase-3 and granzyme A (GA) pathways through the cleavage of NDUFS1 and NDUFS3, respectively.^{15, 16, 17, 18} GA induces cell death in a Bcl-2-insensitive and caspase- and MOMP-independent manner that has all the morphological features of apoptosis.^{1, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20} As GA and GB cell death pathways are significantly different, whether ROS are also critical for GB still need to be tested. Here, we show that GB induces ROS-dependent apoptosis by directly attacking the mitochondria in a caspase-independent manner to cleave NDUFS1, NDUFS2 and NDUFV1 in complex I. Consequently, GB inhibits electron transport chain (ETC) complex I and III activities, mitochondrial ROS production is triggered and mitochondrial respiration is compromised. Interestingly, MOMP is not required for GB to cleave the mitochondrial complex I subunits and ROS production. Moreover, GB action on complex I disrupts the organization of the respiratory chain and triggers the loss of the mitochondrial cristae junctions. We also show that GB-mediated mitocentric ROS are necessary for proper apoptogenic factor release from the mitochondria to the cytosol and for the rapid DNA fragmentation, both hallmarks of apoptosis. Moreover, GB-induced ROS are necessary for lysosomal membrane rupture. Thus, our work brings a new light to the GB pathway, showing that GB-mediated mitochondrial ROS are not adventitious waste of cell death, but essential mediators of apoptosis.     

Chaperone-like protein p32 regulates ULK1 stability and autophagy

Mitophagy mediates clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria, and represents one type of mitochondrial quality control, which is essential for optimal mitochondrial bioenergetics. p32, a chaperone-like protein, is crucial for maintaining mitochondrial membrane potential and oxidative phosphorylation. However, the relationship between p32 and mitochondrial homeostasis has not been addressed. Here, we identified p32 as a key regulator of ULK1 stability by forming complex with ULK1. p32 depletion potentiated K48-linked but impaired K63-linked polyubiquitination of ULK1, leading to proteasome-mediated degradation of ULK1. As a result, silencing p32 profoundly impaired starvation-induced autophagic flux and the clearance of damaged mitochondria caused by mitochondrial uncoupler. Importantly, restoring ULK1 expression in p32-depleted cells rescued autophagy and mitophagy defects. Our findings highlight a cytoprotective role of p32 under starvation conditions by regulating ULK1 stability, and uncover a crucial role of the p32–ULK1-autophagy axis in coordinating stress response, cell survival and mitochondrial homeostasis.Mitophagy is a selective form of autophagy by which mitochondria are degraded in autolysosomes. p32 is a critical regulator of mitochondrial bioenergetics.¹ It primarily localizes to the mitochondrial matrix, but has also been reported to be present in other subcellular locations.^{2, 3, 4, 5} Many human tumors exhibit higher p32 expression levels than their nonmalignant counterpart tissues.^{6, 7, 8, 9} Depleting p32 in human cancer cells strongly shifts their metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis.¹ Consistently, p32 knockout causes mid-gestation lethality of knockout embryos and defects in oxidative phosphorylation. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) generated from p32 knockout embryos exhibited impaired ATP production and reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, which is in agreement with the observation that p32 silencing leads to increased mitochondrial fragmentation.^{10, 11} Notably, p32 was found to form protein complex with a variety of molecules^{7, 12, 13} and has been suggested that it may act as a multifunctional chaperone protein.^{12, 13, 14}ULK1 has a crucial role in mitophagy induction.¹⁵ Despite the pivotal role of ULK1 in mitochondrial clearance, little is known as how ULK1 itself is regulated. ULK1 is a relatively stable protein and is subject to proteasome-mediated degradation. Post-translational modifications including K63-linked ubiquitylation^{16, 17} and phosphorylation^{18, 19, 20} have been reported to modulate the rates of ULK1 turnover and kinase activity in different cellular contexts. Hsp90 and Cdc37 have been shown to regulate ULK1 stability and activity by forming complex with ULK1, which subsequently influences Atg13-mediated mitophagy.²¹ Here, we found p32 regulates ULK1 stability by forming protein complex with ULK1. The interaction between ULK1 and p32 is crucial for maintaining the steady-state levels and activity of ULK1. We further show that p32 ablation results in a defect in autophagy in EBSS-starved cells, and impairs clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria in cells exposed to mitochondrial uncoupler. Importantly, these autophagy and mitophagy defects can be restored by re-introducing ULK1 into p32-deficient cells, demonstrating ULK1 functions as a crucial downstream effector of p32.     

NF-κB pathway controls mitochondrial dynamics

The Optic atrophy 1 protein (OPA1) is a key element in the dynamics and morphology of mitochondria. We demonstrated that the absence of IκB kinase-α, which is a key element of the nonclassical NF-κB pathway, has an impact on the mitochondrial network morphology and OPA1 expression. In contrast, the absence of NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO) or IκB kinase-β, both of which are essential for the canonical NF-κB pathway, has no impact on mitochondrial dynamics. Whereas Parkin has been reported to positively regulate the expression of OPA1 through NEMO, herein we found that PARK2 overexpression did not modify the expression of OPA1. PARK2 expression reduced the levels of Bax, and it prevented stress-induced cell death only in Bak-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblast cells. Collectively, our results point out a role of the nonclassical NF-κB pathway in the regulation of mitochondrial dynamics and OPA1 expression.Mitochondria perform multiple functions that are critical to the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. Mitochondrial dysfunctions have been linked to the development of degenerative diseases and aging. Damaged mitochondria are removed by mitophagy, a process partially regulated by the PARK2-encoded E3 ubiquitin ligase (Parkin) in a PTEN-induced putative protein kinase 1 (PINK1)-dependent manner.^{1, 2, 3, 4} During mitophagy, the phosphorylation of mitofusin (Mfn) 2 by PINK1 has been suggested to induce the recruitment of Parkin to the mitochondria in cardiomyocytes.⁵ However, previous groups have shown that that Mfn 1 and 2 are dispensable for Parkin-dependent mitophagy in fibroblasts, whereas the Parkin-dependent degradation of these proteins may impair fusion of damaged mitochondria with the healthy network.^{6, 7, 8} PINK1 and Parkin thus act as a quality control machinery on the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) to preserve mitochondrial integrity through the ubiquitination of OMM proteins.^{9, 10} Moreover, through its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity,^{11, 12} Parkin was reported to bind to the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) and to increase the ubiquitination of NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO),¹³ a component of the classical NF-κB signaling pathway.¹⁴ Müller–Rischart et al. also proposed that Parkin positively regulates the expression of the mitochondrial guanosine triphosphatase Optic atrophy 1 protein (OPA1) through linear ubiquitination of NEMO.¹³ OPA1 is a regulator of mitochondrial inner membrane fusion and cristae remodeling.^{15, 16, 17} A defect in OPA1 expression is associated with mitochondrial network fragmentation and enhanced sensitivity of the cells to undergo apoptosis by promoting cytochrome c release from the mitochondria.^{18, 19, 20} Because NEMO-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells display a normal mitochondrial network morphology, we decided to re-examine the role of Parkin in regulating OPA1 expression through the NF-κB signaling pathway.     

The protease Omi regulates mitochondrial biogenesis through the GSK3β/PGC-1α pathway

Loss of the mitochondrial protease activity of Omi causes mitochondrial dysfunction, neurodegeneration with parkinsonian features and premature death in mnd2 (motor neuron degeneration 2) mice. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying this pathology remain largely unknown. Here, we report that Omi participates in the process of mitochondrial biogenesis, which has been linked to several neurodegenerative diseases. The mitochondrial biogenesis is deficit in mnd2 mice, evidenced by severe decreases of mitochondrial components, mitochondrial DNA and mitochondrial density. Omi cleaves glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), a kinase promoting PPARγ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) degradation, to regulate PGC-1α, a factor important for the mitochondrial biogenesis. In mnd2 mice, GSK3β abundance is increased and PGC-1α abundance is decreased significantly. Inhibition of GSK3β by SB216763 or overexpression of PGC-1α can restore mitochondrial biogenesis in mnd2 mice or Omi-knockdown N2a cells. Furthermore, there is a significant improvement of the movement ability of mnd2 mice after SB216763 treatment. Thus, our study identified Omi as a novel regulator of mitochondrial biogenesis, involving in Omi protease-deficient-induced neurodegeneration.Mitochondria have a vital role in neuronal death and survival.¹ As critical cellular organelles, mitochondria have highly dynamic properties, including mitochondrial fission, fusion, transport, biogenesis and degradation. The changes of those properties affect mitochondrial functions, leading to the occurrence of diseases.^{2, 3} Growing lines of evidence suggest that the mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in aging and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer''s disease (AD), Huntington''s disease (HD) and Parkinson''s disease (PD).^{4, 5} Similar to other neurodegenerative diseases, PD is a progressive neurological disorder, which is characterized by the development of cytoplasmic aggregates known as Lewy bodies and degeneration of dopaminergic (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra of midbrain and other brain regions.⁶ In PD, dysfunction of mitochondria has been documented to be associated with disease pathogenesis in PD brains and both genetic- and toxin-induced PD animal models. In PD brains, mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) occur more frequently than those in age-matched control; and mutations in the nuclear-encoded mtDNA polymerase-γ gene, which impair mtDNA replication and result in multiple mtDNA deletions, cause PD-like symptoms.⁵ Meanwhile, several PD-associated gene products, including α-synuclein, parkin, DJ-1, PINK1 (PTEN-induced putative kinase 1), leucine-rich repeat kinase 2, ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 and Omi, have been identified to be associated with PD, and lead to mitochondrial dysfunction with changes in mitochondrial morphology, biogenesis and mitophagy in vivo and in vitro.^{5, 7, 8, 9} Besides, mitochondrial toxins, such as MPTP (1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine) and rotenone that inhibit complex I of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, cause clinically parkinsonian phenotype.^{10, 11}The serine protease Omi (also known as HtrA2) belongs to the high-temperature requirement factor A (HtrA) family, and was originally identified as a mammalian homolog of the Escherichia coli heat-shock-induced serine protease HtrA/DegP and DegS.¹² Omi is mainly localized in mitochondria, although a fraction of it is also found in nucleus.¹³ Omi is released from the mitochondria into the cytosol to mediate cell death by caspase-dependent or -independent pathways in response to apoptotic stimuli.^{14, 15} However, the notion that Omi is an apoptosis inducer in the central nervous system was challenged by studies of Omi-overexpressing or -deficient mice. Omi-overexpressing mice show normal development without any sign of apoptotic cell death.¹⁶ On the other hand, mnd2 (motor neuron degeneration 2) mice that harbor protease-deficient Omi S276C mutants, and Omi-knockout mice both suffer from progressive neurodegeneration, especially in striatum, and motor abnormalities similar to PD. Both mice fail to gain weight and die before postnatal day 40 due to neurodegeneration with progressive mitochondrial damage.^{17, 18, 19} Besides, mutations in the Omi gene have also been identified in PD patients.^{20, 21} Previous studies have shown that Omi has a vital role in the mitochondrial integrity, and the loss of protease activity leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, such as abnormal mitochondrial morphology and increased mtDNA mutation and deletions, increased susceptibility of mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, and reduced mitochondrial density in mnd2 mice and Omi-knockout mice.^{17, 18, 22} Omi has been found to act downstream of PINK1, but parallel to parkin, in a mitochondrial stress sensing pathway to sense the different stresses, which may be defective in PD.²³ These findings suggest that the primary function of Omi is involved in neuroprotection, especially in the maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis.^{23, 24}In this article, we identified that Omi cleaves glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) to regulate PPARγ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) abundance and to ensure mitochondrial biogenesis.     

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Transplantation in a Cynomolgus Macaque (Macaca fasicularis)

A 5.5-y-old intact male cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fasicularis) presented with inappetence and weight loss 57 d after heterotopic heart and thymus transplantation while receiving an immunosuppressant regimen consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone to prevent graft rejection. A serum chemistry panel, a glycated hemoglobin test, and urinalysis performed at presentation revealed elevated blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (727 mg/dL and 10.1%, respectively), glucosuria, and ketonuria. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed, and insulin therapy was initiated immediately. The macaque was weaned off the immunosuppressive therapy as his clinical condition improved and stabilized. Approximately 74 d after discontinuation of the immunosuppressants, the blood glucose normalized, and the insulin therapy was stopped. The animal''s blood glucose and HbA1c values have remained within normal limits since this time. We suspect that our macaque experienced new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation, a condition that is commonly observed in human transplant patients but not well described in NHP. To our knowledge, this report represents the first documented case of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation in a cynomolgus macaque.Abbreviations: NODAT, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantationNew-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT, formerly known as posttransplantation diabetes mellitus) is an important consequence of solid-organ transplantation in humans.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} A variety of risk factors have been identified including increased age, sex (male prevalence), elevated pretransplant fasting plasma glucose levels, and immunosuppressive therapy.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} The relationship between calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporin, and the development of NODAT is widely recognized in human medicine.^{7-10,15,17,19,21,25-28,31,33,34,37,38,42} Cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fasicularis) are a commonly used NHP model in organ transplantation research. Cases of natural and induced diabetes of cynomolgus monkeys have been described in the literature;^14,43,45 however, NODAT in a macaque model of solid-organ transplantation has not been reported previously to our knowledge.     

Decreased mitochondrial priming determines chemoresistance of colon cancer stem cells

Tumor heterogeneity is in part determined by the existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and more differentiated tumor cells. CSCs are considered to be the tumorigenic root of cancers and suggested to be chemotherapy resistant. Here we exploited an assay that allowed us to measure chemotherapy-induced cell death in CSCs and differentiated tumor cells simultaneously. This confirmed that CSCs are selectively resistant to conventional chemotherapy, which we revealed is determined by decreased mitochondrial priming. In agreement, lowering the anti-apoptotic threshold using ABT-737 and WEHI-539 was sufficient to enhance chemotherapy efficacy, whereas ABT-199 failed to sensitize CSCs. Our data therefore point to a crucial role of BCLXL in protecting CSCs from chemotherapy and suggest that BH3 mimetics, in combination with chemotherapy, can be an efficient way to target chemotherapy-resistant CSCs.Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide.^{1, 2} Patients with advanced stage colorectal cancer are routinely treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), or with 5-FU, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI), often in combination with targeted agents such as anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR at metastatic disease.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Despite this intensive treatment, therapy is still insufficiently effective and chemotherapy resistance occurs frequently. Although still speculative, it has been suggested that unequal sensitivity to chemotherapy is due to an intratumoral heterogeneity that is orchestrated by cancer stem cells (CSCs) that can self-renew and give rise to more differentiated progeny.^{7, 8} When isolated from patients, CSCs efficiently form tumors upon xenotransplantation into mice which resemble the primary tumor from which they originated.^{9, 10, 11} In addition, many xenotransplantation studies have emphasized the importance of CSCs for tumor growth.^{9, 10, 11, 12} Colon CSCs were originally isolated from primary human colorectal tumor specimens using CD133 as cell surface marker and shown to be highly tumorigenic when compared with the non-CSCs population within a tumor.^{9, 10} Later, other cell surface markers as well as the activity of the Wnt pathway have been used to isolate colon CSCs from tumors.^{12, 13} Spheroid cultures have been established from human primary colorectal tumors that selectively enrich for the growth of colon CSCs,^{11, 12} although it is important to realize that these spheres also contain more differentiated tumor cells.¹² In agreement, we have shown that the Wnt activity reporter that directs the expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (TOP-GFP) allows for the separation of CSCs from more differentiated progeny in the spheroid cultures.¹²CSCs are suggested to be responsible for tumor recurrence after initial therapy, as they are considered to be selectively resistant to therapy.^{11, 14} Conventional chemotherapy induces, among others, DNA damage and subsequent activation of the mitochondrial cell death pathway, which is regulated by a balance between pro- and anti-apoptotic BCL2 family members.¹⁵ Upon activation of apoptosis, pro-apoptotic BH3 molecules are activated and these may perturb the balance in favor of apoptosis initiated by mitochondrial outer membrane polarization (MOMP), release of cytochrome c and subsequent activation of a caspase cascade.The apoptotic balance of cancer cells can be measured with the use of a functional assay called BH3 profiling.¹⁶ BH3 profiling is a method to determine the apoptotic ‘priming'' level of a cell by exposing mitochondria to standardized amounts of roughly 20-mer peptides derived from the alpha-helical BH3 domains of BH3-only proteins and determining the rate of mitochondrial depolarization. Using this approach, priming was measured in various cancers and compared with normal tissues.^{17, 18} In all cancer types tested, the mitochondrial priming correlated well with the observed clinical response to chemotherapy. That is, cancers that are highly primed are more chemosensitive, whereas chemoresistant tumor cells and normal tissues are poorly primed.^{17, 18} This suggests that increasing mitochondrial priming can potentially increase chemosensitivity, which can be achieved by directly inhibiting the anti-apoptotic BCL2 family members.¹⁸ To this end, small-molecule inhibitors, so-called BH3 mimetics, have been developed. ABT-737 and the highly related ABT-263 both inhibit BCL2, BCLXL and BCLW^{19, 20, 21} and were shown to be effective in killing cancer cells in vitro and in vivo²¹ with a preference for BCL2.^{19, 22} As BCL2 protein expression is often upregulated in hematopoietic cancers, it represents a promising target, which was supported by high efficacy of these BH3 mimetics in animal experiments.²¹ However, in vivo efficacy is limited due to thrombocytopenia, which relates to a dependence of platelets on BCLXL for survival.^{23, 24} To overcome this toxicity, a BCL2-specific compound, ABT-199, was developed.²⁵ Souers et al.²⁵ showed that inhibition of BCL2 using ABT-199 blocks tumor growth of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells in xenografts. In addition to the single compound effects of ABT-199, combination with rituximab inhibited growth of non-Hodgkin''s lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukemia tumor cells growth in vivo.²⁵ Moreover, highly effective tumor lysis was observed in all three patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia that were treated with ABT-199.²⁵ More recently, a BCLXL-specific compound, WEHI-539, was discovered using high-throughput chemical screening.²⁶As the apoptotic balance appears a useful target for the treatment of cancers and CSCs have been suggested to resist therapy selectively, we set out to analyze whether specifically colon CSCs are resistant to therapy and whether this is due to an enhanced anti-apoptotic threshold, specific to CSCs. To study chemosensitivity, we developed a robust single cell-based analysis in which we can measure apoptosis simultaneously in CSCs and their differentiated progeny. Utilizing this system we showed that colon CSCs and not their differentiated progeny are resistant to chemotherapeutic compounds and that this was due to the fact that these cells are less primed to mitochondrial death. Furthermore, inhibition of anti-apoptotic BCLXL molecule with either ABT-737 or WEHI-539, but not ABT-199, breaks this resistance and sensitizes the CSCs to chemotherapy.