Monoclonal Antibodies to Distinct Sites on Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Glycoprotein D Block HSV Binding to HVEM

HVEM (for herpesvirus entry mediator) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily and mediates entry of many strains of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into normally nonpermissive Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. We used sucrose density centrifugation to demonstrate that purified HSV-1 KOS virions bind directly to a soluble, truncated form of HVEM (HVEMt) in the absence of any other cell-associated components. Therefore, HVEM mediates HSV entry by serving as a receptor for the virus. We previously showed that soluble, truncated forms of HSV glycoprotein D (gDt) bind to HVEMt in vitro. Here we show that antibodies specific for gD, but not the other entry glycoproteins gB, gC, or the gH/gL complex, completely block HSV binding to HVEM. Thus, virion gD is the principal mediator of HSV binding to HVEM. To map sites on virion gD which are necessary for its interaction with HVEM, we preincubated virions with gD-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). MAbs that recognize antigenic sites Ib and VII of gD were the only MAbs which blocked the HSV-HVEM interaction. MAbs from these two groups failed to coprecipitate HVEMt in the presence of soluble gDt, whereas the other anti-gD MAbs coprecipitated HVEMt and gDt. Previous mapping data indicated that site VII includes amino acids 11 to 19 and site Ib includes 222 to 252. The current experiments indicate that these sites contain residues important for HSV binding to HVEM. Group Ib and VII MAbs also blocked HSV entry into HVEM-expressing CHO cells. These results suggest that the mechanism of neutralization by these MAbs is via interference with the interaction between gD in the virus and HVEM on the cell. Group Ia and II MAbs failed to block HSV binding to HVEM yet still neutralized HVEM-mediated entry, suggesting that these MAbs block entry at a step other than HVEM binding.     

Neurofilament Monoclonal Antibodies RT97 and 8D8 Recognize Different Modified Epitopes in Paired Helical Filament-τ in Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract: Neurofibrillary tangles in Alzheimer's disease have been previously found to be labeled by some neurofilament antibodies that also recognize τ proteins. We have studied the reactivity of two such monoclonal antibodies, RT97 and 8D8, and of an anti-ubiquitin serum with the abnormal paired helical filaments (PHF)-τ (A68) polypeptides known to be the main component of the PHFs constituting the neurofibrillary tangles. 8D8 recognized the three major PHF-τ polypeptides, but RT97 reacted only with the two larger PHF-τ species. PHF-τ polypeptides were labeled by 8D8 and RT97 much more strongly than normal human τ and this labeling was decreased after alkaline phosphatase treatment. Anti-ubiquitin and anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies did not label PHF-τ polypeptides. The immunoreactivity of proteolytic fragments of PHF-τ polypeptides was studied with RT97, 8D8, and a panel of τ antibodies. The epitope for 8D8 on PHF-τ was localized between amino acids 222 and 427 in the carboxyl half of τ. The RT97 epitope on PHF-τ was localized in the amino domain of τ, probably in the 29-amino-acid insertion (insert 1) found towards the amino terminus of some τ isoforms. These results show that the basis for the labeling of neurofibrillary tangles by antibodies 8D8 and RT97 to neurofilament is their ability to react with PHF-τ polypeptides by recognizing sites specifically modified on PHF-τ, including a site specific to some τ isoforms.     

ATP-dependent Proteases Differ Substantially in Their Ability to Unfold Globular Proteins

ATP-dependent proteases control the concentrations of hundreds of regulatory proteins and remove damaged or misfolded proteins from cells. They select their substrates primarily by recognizing sequence motifs or covalent modifications. Once a substrate is bound to the protease, it has to be unfolded and translocated into the proteolytic chamber to be degraded. Some proteases appear to be promiscuous, degrading substrates with poorly defined targeting signals, which suggests that selectivity may be controlled at additional levels. Here we compare the abilities of representatives from all classes of ATP-dependent proteases to unfold a model substrate protein and find that the unfolding abilities range over more than 2 orders of magnitude. We propose that these differences in unfolding abilities contribute to the fates of substrate proteins and may act as a further layer of selectivity during protein destruction.Energy-dependent proteolysis is responsible for more than 90% of the protein turnover inside the cell (1). This process both removes misfolded and aggregated proteins as part of the response of the cell to stress and controls the concentrations of regulatory proteins (2, 3). In prokaryotes and eukaryotic organelles, energy-dependent proteases fall into five classes as follows: ClpAP, ClpXP, Lon, HslUV (also referred to as ClpYQ), and HflB (also referred to as FtsH). In Archaea, analogous functions are performed by the archaebacterial proteasome, consisting of the proteasome-activating nucleotidase (PAN),³ working with the 20 S proteasome (4); in the cytoplasm and nucleus of eukaryotes, these same functions are performed by the 26 S proteasome (5). These different proteases show little sequence conservation outside the ATP-binding domains, but they share their overall architecture. They all form oligomeric, barrel-shaped complexes composed of one or more rings with the active sites of proteolysis sequestered inside a central degradation chamber (6). Access channels to these sites are narrow, and proteins have to be unfolded to gain entry (6). Regulatory particles belonging to the AAA family of molecular chaperones assemble on either end of the proteolytic chamber and recognize substrates destined for degradation. After recognition, the regulatory particles translocate the substrate through a central channel to the proteolytic chamber and in doing so unravel folded domains within the substrate. Translocation and unfolding are driven by ATP hydrolysis by the regulatory particles, with conformational changes in the protease transmitted to the substrate by conserved residues in the loops lining the channel (7–10).Protein degradation by AAA proteases is tightly regulated. Most proteins are targeted to ClpAP, ClpXP, HslUV, Lon, HflB, and PAN by sequence motifs in their primary structure (11–17). Sometimes adaptor proteins recognize and bind sequence elements in substrates and deliver them to the protease, and other times the protease recognizes sequence elements directly (18, 19). In contrast, proteins are typically targeted to the 26 S proteasome through the covalent attachment of polyubiquitin chains (20). Thus, substrates appear to be selected for degradation based on the presence of specific recognition elements in the protein substrates.However, other mechanisms may also affect the specificity of degradation by prokaryotic proteases. Individual proteases recognize a wide range of targeting signals (11, 16). (For example, Escherichia coli ClpXP recognizes sequences belonging to five distinct classes of consensus sequences (11), and ClpAP, Lon, and FtsH can bind to unstructured regions in proteins with a wide range of amino acid sequences (21–23).) One illustration of the loose specificity in targeting signals is the ability of a mitochondrial presequence to target proteins to the proteases ClpAP (24) and HslUV in vitro (see below). In addition, substrates are commonly acted upon by several different proteases in E. coli. For instance, proteins containing the 11-residue ssrA peptide at their C termini can be recognized by ClpAP, ClpXP, FtsH, Lon, and the archaebacterial proteasome (4, 25–27). Similarly, some substrates of Lon can be degraded by HslUV in vivo (28).It is not clear how degradation remains selective despite the loose specificity of targeting signals. We propose that the intrinsic protein unfolding ability of AAA proteases and the stabilities of substrates against unfolding play a role in determining the fate of cellular proteins. For example, ClpXP releases hard-to-unfold substrates when it encounters them and degrades destabilized titin variants 20-fold faster than wild type titin (29). The membrane-bound AAA protease FtsH has a weak unfolding ability, which allows this protease to act selectively on damaged and unfolded polypeptides (30). Here we find that the relative unfolding abilities of ATP-dependent proteases vary more than 100-fold and that the unfolding abilities of proteases belonging to the same class but originating from different species appear to be conserved. The unfolding abilities also seem to be intrinsic properties of the proteases themselves rather than other cytosolic factors, such as chaperones. Differences in protease unfolding abilities may contribute to substrate selectivity during protein degradation. For example, expression of a protease with a weak unfolding ability during a stress response could allow the selective elimination of unfolded, misfolded, or otherwise aberrant proteins and spare stable proteins from destruction (30).     

Enhancement and Neutralization of Feline Infectious Peritonitis Virus Infection in Feline Macrophages by Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies Recognizing Different Epitopes

The interaction between the enhancing and neutralizing activities of three monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (5-6-2, 6-4-2 and 7-4-1) to the spike protein of feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) strain 79-1146 was determined using feline macrophages. At a high MAb concentration, all of the three MAbs completely inhibited the FIPV infection at 37 C. However, two of them (6-4-2 and 7-4-1) enhanced FIPV infection when either the MAb concentration or reaction temperature was lowered. These MAbs also exerted an immediate infectivity-enhancing activity for up to 10 min of reaction and by 20 min, neutralizing activities were observed. Only MAb 5-6-2 consistently showed neutralizing activity regardless of the reaction conditions. Competition with sera from cats experimentally infected with FIPV strain 79-1146 or feline enteric coronavirus strain 79-1683 showed that the two epitopes recognized by MAb 5-6-2 and MAb 6-4-2, respectively, are also recognized by the natural host.     

单克隆抗体对小苍兰褪绿条纹花叶病毒及其决定簇的作用特性

采用杂交瘤技术,得到抗小苍兰褪绿色条纹花叶病毒（FCSMV）六个单克隆抗体P3、4A4,6B、,7A6,7D1和7DS。ELISA效价分别为1：1062－1：10^6。7A6攻7D1属于IgG1亚类,7D8和4A4分属IgG2a和IgG2b亚类,P3和6B1属于IgG2亚类。电镜观察单克隆抗体与病毒形成的复合物发现7D1能使病毒粒子发生严重裂断。6株单克隆抗体中P3,4A4、6B1对应于病毒外壳蛋白上的顺序决定簇。纯化的病毒外壳蛋白经酶裂解和改进的盘状电泳分离,得到八段与多克隆抗体反应的收集液。用顺序决定族的单克隆抗体检出P3对应的肽段22和4A4对应的肽段78。本文还讨论了7D1使病毒粒子发生断裂的原因和与病毒粒子表面结构的关系以及分离抗原决定族所在片段的意义。     

Purified, Soluble Recombinant Mouse Hepatitis Virus Receptor, Bgp1b, and Bgp2 Murine Coronavirus Receptors Differ in Mouse Hepatitis Virus Binding and Neutralizing Activities

Mouse hepatitis virus receptor (MHVR) is a murine biliary glycoprotein (Bgp1^a). Purified, soluble MHVR expressed from a recombinant vaccinia virus neutralized the infectivity of the A59 strain of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV-A59) in a concentration-dependent manner. Several anchored murine Bgps in addition to MHVR can also function as MHV-A59 receptors when expressed at high levels in nonmurine cells. To investigate the interactions of these alternative MHVR glycoproteins with MHV, we expressed and purified to apparent homogeneity the extracellular domains of several murine Bgps as soluble, six-histidine-tagged glycoproteins, using a baculovirus expression system. These include MHVR isoforms containing four or two extracellular domains and the corresponding Bgp1^b glycoproteins from MHV-resistant SJL/J mice, as well as Bgp2 and truncation mutants of MHVR and Bgp1^b comprised of the first two immunoglobulin-like domains. The soluble four-domain MHVR glycoprotein (sMHVR[1-4]) had fourfold more MHV-A59 neutralizing activity than the corresponding soluble Bgp1^b (sBgp1^b) glycoprotein and at least 1,000-fold more neutralizing activity than sBgp2. Although virus binds to the N-terminal domain (domain 1), soluble truncation mutants of MHVR and Bgp1^b containing only domains 1 and 2 bound virus poorly and had 10- and 300-fold less MHV-A59 neutralizing activity than the corresponding four-domain glycoproteins. In contrast, the soluble MHVR glycoprotein containing domains 1 and 4 (sMHVR[1,4]) had as much neutralizing activity as the four-domain glycoprotein, sMHVR[1-4]. Thus, the virus neutralizing activity of MHVR domain 1 appears to be enhanced by domain 4. The sBgp1^b[1-4] glycoprotein had 500-fold less neutralizing activity for MHV-JHM than for MHV-A59. Thus, MHV strains with differences in S-glycoprotein sequence, tissue tropism, and virulence can differ in the ability to utilize the various murine Bgps as receptors.     

Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Binding by Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoproteins B and C, Which Differ in Their Contributions to Virus Attachment, Penetration, and Cell-to-Cell Spread

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) mutants defective for envelope glycoprotein C (gC) and gB are highly impaired in the ability to attach to cell surface heparan sulfate (HS) moieties of proteoglycans, the initial virus receptor. Here we report studies aimed at defining the HS binding element of HSV-1 (strain KOS) gB and determining whether this structure is functionally independent of gB’s role in extracellular virus penetration or intercellular virus spread. A mutant form of gB deleted for a putative HS binding lysine-rich (pK) sequence (residues 68 to 76) was transiently expressed in Vero cells and shown to be processed normally, leading to exposure on the cell surface. Solubilized gBpK⁻ also had substantially lower affinity for heparin-acrylic beads than did wild-type gB, confirming that the HS binding domain had been inactivated. The gBpK⁻ gene was used to rescue a KOS gB null mutant virus to produce the replication-competent mutant KgBpK⁻. Compared with wild-type virus, KgBpK⁻ showed reduced binding to mouse L cells (ca. 20%), while a gC null mutant virus in which the gC coding sequence was replaced by the lacZ gene (KCZ) was substantially more impaired (ca. 65%-reduced binding), indicating that the contribution of gC to HS binding was greater than that of gB. The effect of combining both mutations into a single virus (KgBpK⁻gC⁻) was additive (ca. 80%-reduced binding to HS) and displayed a binding activity similar to that observed for KOS virus attachment to sog9 cells, a glycosaminoglycan-deficient L-cell line. Cell-adsorbed individual and double HS mutant viruses exhibited a lower rate of virus entry following attachment, suggesting that HS binding plays a role in the process of virus penetration. Moreover, the KgBpK⁻ mutant virus produced small plaques on Vero cells in the presence of neutralizing antibody where plaque formation depended on cell-to-cell virus spread. These studies permitted the following conclusions: (i) the pK sequence is not essential for gB processing or function in virus infection, (ii) the lysine-rich sequence of gB is responsible for HS binding, and (iii) binding to HS is cooperatively linked to the process of efficient virus entry and lateral spread but is not absolutely required for virus infectivity.     

抗呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)单克隆抗体的制备及其对RSV病毒株抗原性的分析

用呼吸道合胞病毒R6(武汉地方株)活毒滴鼻加用戍二醛固定的病毒感染的Hela细胞免疫BALB/C鼠,取脾细胞与小鼠骨髓瘤SP_2/0细胞融合,培育出分泌抗呼吸道合胞病毒单克隆抗体的杂交瘤细胞13株,这些细胞的染色体数为94至104条,其分泌的抗体分别属于鼠IgC_1、IgG_(2a)、IgG_(2b)亚类。腹水荧光抗体滴度为1:10000～1:100000。其中五株单抗有中和病毒作用,尤其是两株中和放价达1:128。应用免疫转印法证实了这些单抗分别能识别RSV6种主要结构蛋白,用7株识别不同病毒结构蛋白的单抗对12株合胞病毒进行抗原性分析,可将这些病毒区分为二个血清型,即A亚型和B亚型。     

抗GPC3 C端抗体辅助杀伤肝癌细胞HepG2的活性检测及抗原表位鉴定

目的：检测制备的7株抗磷脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖3（GPC3）蛋白C端单克隆抗体是否具有辅助杀伤肝癌细胞的活性,并研究其识别的抗原表位。方法：用细胞增殖法检测制备的抗体是否具有抗体依赖细胞介导的细胞毒性（ADCC）活性;用生物信息软件分析GPC3蛋白C端（359～580残基）的结构及抗原特征,并据此将其分为4个截短片段,将克隆的各基因片段分别连接到原核表达载体pGEX-4T-1中,进行蛋白表达和纯化,用间接ELISA和Western印迹分析GPC3C端单克隆抗体的表位识别情况。结果与结论：制备的7株单克隆抗体对肝癌细胞HepG2均具有不同程度的辅助杀伤作用,其中5号单克隆抗体的辅助杀伤效果最好;表达并纯化了GPC3C端4个截短片段的重组蛋白;间接ELISA和Western印迹检测结果表明,7株抗体均特异性结合GPC3蛋白的473～525残基区段。     

Anti-Human IgE Monoclonal Antibodies Recognizing Epitopes Related to the Binding Sites of High and Low Affinity IgE Receptors

Anti-human IgE monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were produced and eight clones recognizing epitopes on native IgE were selected. Epitopes were mapped by a competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Western blotting and a multi-pin peptide technology. Four sites (one each in the Cε1, Cε2, Cε2/Cε3 junction and Cε3) were recognized by the mAbs. The relationship between the four epitopes and the binding sites of high and low affinity IgE receptors (FcεRI and FcεRII, respectively) was studied using a monovalent Fab fragment of each mAb as a binding inhibitor. The IgE-FcεRII binding was clearly inhibited by the mAb recognizing the Cε2/Cε3 junction, suggesting that FcεRII binds to a rather limited area around the Cε2/Cε3 junction. The IgE-FcεRI binding, on the other hand, was scarcely inhibited by any single mAb. However, the binding was inhibited when the epitope in Cε2 was blocked simultaneously with that at the Cε2/Cε3 junction or with that in Cε3, indicating that these three distinct epitopes are related to the FcεRI binding sites. When these three epitopes were shown in the stereograph of human IgE, the FcεRI binding area was spread largely on the groove side between Cε2 and Cε3 domains. These results suggest that FcεRI acquires the high affinity through multiple bindings.     

Seoul Virus-Infected Rat Lung Endothelial Cells and Alveolar Macrophages Differ in Their Ability To Support Virus Replication and Induce Regulatory T Cell Phenotypes

Hantaviruses cause a persistent infection in reservoir hosts that is attributed to the upregulation of regulatory responses and downregulation of proinflammatory responses. To determine whether rat alveolar macrophages (AMs) and lung microvascular endothelial cells (LMVECs) support Seoul virus (SEOV) replication and contribute to the induction of an environment that polarizes CD4⁺ T cell differentiation toward a regulatory T (Treg) cell phenotype, cultured primary rat AMs and LMVECs were mock infected or infected with SEOV and analyzed for viral replication, cytokine and chemokine responses, and expression of cell surface markers that are related to T cell activation. Allogeneic CD4⁺ T cells were cocultured with SEOV-infected or mock-infected AMs or LMVECs and analyzed for helper T cell (i.e., Treg, Th17, Th1, and Th2) marker expression and Treg cell frequency. SEOV RNA and infectious particles in culture media were detected in both cell types, but at higher levels in LMVECs than in AMs postinfection. Expression of Ifnβ, Ccl5, and Cxcl10 and surface major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) and MHC-I was not altered by SEOV infection in either cell type. SEOV infection significantly increased Tgfβ mRNA in AMs and the amount of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) in LMVECs. SEOV-infected LMVECs, but not AMs, induced a significant increase in Foxp3 expression and Treg cell frequency in allogeneic CD4⁺ T cells, which was virus replication and cell contact dependent. These data suggest that in addition to supporting viral replication, AMs and LMVECs play distinct roles in hantavirus persistence by creating a regulatory environment through increased Tgfβ, PD-L1, and Treg cell activity.     

Live Chimeric and Inactivated Japanese Encephalitis Virus Vaccines Differ in Their Cross-Protective Values against Murray Valley Encephalitis Virus

The Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) serocomplex, which also includes Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV), is a group of antigenically closely related, mosquito-borne flaviviruses that are responsible for severe encephalitic disease in humans. While vaccines against the prominent members of this serocomplex are available or under development, it is unlikely that they will be produced specifically against those viruses which cause less-frequent disease, such as MVEV. Here we have evaluated the cross-protective values of an inactivated JEV vaccine (JE-VAX) and a live chimeric JEV vaccine (ChimeriVax-JE) against MVEV in two mouse models of flaviviral encephalitis. We show that (i) a three-dose vaccination schedule with JE-VAX provides cross-protective immunity, albeit only partial in the more severe challenge model; (ii) a single dose of ChimeriVax-JE gives complete protection in both challenge models; (iii) the cross-protective immunity elicited with ChimeriVax-JE is durable (≥5 months) and broad (also giving protection against West Nile virus); (iv) humoral and cellular immunities elicited with ChimeriVax-JE contribute to protection against lethal challenge with MVEV; (v) ChimeriVax-JE remains fully attenuated in immunodeficient mice lacking type I and type II interferon responses; and (vi) immunization with JE-VAX, but not ChimeriVax-JE, can prime heterologous infection enhancement in recipients of vaccination on a low-dose schedule, designed to mimic vaccine failure or waning of vaccine-induced immunity. Our results suggest that the live chimeric JEV vaccine will protect against other viruses belonging to the JEV serocomplex, consistent with the observation of cross-protection following live virus infections.Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus belonging to the Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) serocomplex which can cause severe, sometimes fatal, disease in humans (reviewed in references 30, 31, 32, and 42). The virus is endemic in northern Australia and Papua New Guinea, where it causes a small number of human cases of encephalitis in most years. In symptomatic patients the case fatality rate is ∼20%, and among those who recover a large number (∼50%) will suffer from neuropsychiatric sequelae. Cases of Murray Valley encephalitis are more common in children or visitors in areas of endemic disease than in adult residents, who have preexisting immunity (7, 42, 46). Sporadically, MVEV spreads to central or southern regions of Australia (e.g., the Murray Valley of southeastern Australia) and causes epidemic viral encephalitis in humans (32). There are no vaccines or antiviral agents available against MVEV, and given the relatively small number of human cases, it is unlikely that a MVEV-specific vaccine for human use will be produced. However, it has been known for many years that at least in animal models, live viral infection with other members of the JEV serocomplex will give cross-protective immunity against heterologous viruses belonging to this group (10, 17, 33, 48, 52). MVEV is genetically and antigenically closely related to JEV (82% amino acid sequence identity in the envelope [E] protein), the most important encephalitic flavivirus in terms of human disease incidence and severity (reviewed in reference 4). A number of live and inactivated JEV vaccines have been licensed or are under development (reviewed in references 2, 16, and 34). If effective and long-lasting cross-protective immunity against MVEV was induced by one of the JEV vaccines, a strong case could be made for its prophylactic use in populations at risk of MVEV infection in Australia. A further reason for investigating the suitability of JEV vaccines in the Australian context is the recent emergence of JEV in northern Australia (18, 19, 41). This has raised the prospect that JEV may become established in enzootic cycles on the Australian mainland, necessitating the use of JEV vaccines in regions where MVEV is also endemic. The impact of MVEV infection in JEV vaccine recipients in terms of disease outcome remains unknown.In contrast to its protective value against heterologous flaviviruses, cross-reactive flavivirus immunity has also been associated with infection- and/or disease-enhancing consequences in natural and laboratory settings (1, 9, 20, 39). Antibody-dependent enhancement of infection is thought to account for the more severe forms of dengue sometimes associated with secondary, heterologous dengue virus infections by a mechanism putatively involving the increased uptake of virus bound with nonneutralizing antibody into Fc receptor-bearing cells (14, 15). For the MVEV/JEV pair, it has been reported that transfer of subneutralizing concentrations of JEV-immune serum or sera from mice suboptimally immunized with inactivated JEV vaccine (JE-VAX; Biken, Japan) can prime recipient mice for a more severe disease when challenged with MVEV (3, 50). We have demonstrated this potentially detrimental effect for the first time in the context of the full complement of the vaccine-primed immune response: the administration of an experimental UV-inactivated MVEV vaccine at a suboptimal dose greatly increased the susceptibility of mice (up to 75% mortality) to challenge with a dose of JEV, which was sublethal in unvaccinated animals (29). It is not clear if this phenomenon is an inherent property of inactivated vaccines, which provide relatively poor immunity in terms of quality, magnitude, and duration in comparison to live virus infections. Here we investigate the protective value and risk of disease potentiation of a recombinant, live JEV vaccine candidate (ChimeriVax-JE) and a licensed, inactivated JEV vaccine (JE-VAX) in mouse models of MVEV and West Nile virus (WNV) encephalitis. ChimeriVax-JE is constructed from yellow fever virus 17D vaccine cDNA by replacement of the viral structural prM and E proteins with those of an attenuated JEV strain; it has been shown to protect mice and monkeys from JEV challenge (12, 36) and has undergone phase 2 and phase 3 trials for safety and efficacy in humans (35, 37).     

Basic Residues in the Matrix Domain and Multimerization Target Murine Leukemia Virus Gag to the Virological Synapse

Murine leukemia virus (MLV) can efficiently spread in tissue cultures by polarizing assembly to virological synapses. The viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) establishes cell-cell contacts and subsequently recruits Gag by a process that depends on its cytoplasmic tail. MLV Gag is recruited to virological synapses through the matrix domain (MA) (J. Jin, F. Li, and W. Mothes, J. Virol. 85:7672–7682, 2011). However, how MA targets Gag to sites of cell-cell contact remains unknown. Here we report that basic residues within MA are critical for directing MLV Gag to virological synapses. Alternative membrane targeting domains (MTDs) containing multiple basic residues can efficiently substitute MA to direct polarized assembly. Similarly, mutations in the polybasic cluster of MA that disrupt Gag polarization can be rescued by N-terminal addition of MTDs containing basic residues. MTDs containing basic residues alone fail to be targeted to the virological synapse. Systematic deletion experiments reveal that domains within Gag known to mediate Gag multimerization are also required. Thus, our data predict the existence of a specific “acidic” interface at virological synapses that mediates the recruitment of MLV Gag via the basic cluster of MA and Gag multimerization.     

Social and Natural Sciences Differ in Their Research Strategies,Adapted to Work for Different Knowledge Landscapes

Do different fields of knowledge require different research strategies? A numerical model exploring different virtual knowledge landscapes, revealed two diverging optimal search strategies. Trend following is maximized when the popularity of new discoveries determine the number of individuals researching it. This strategy works best when many researchers explore few large areas of knowledge. In contrast, individuals or small groups of researchers are better in discovering small bits of information in dispersed knowledge landscapes. Bibliometric data of scientific publications showed a continuous bipolar distribution of these strategies, ranging from natural sciences, with highly cited publications in journals containing a large number of articles, to the social sciences, with rarely cited publications in many journals containing a small number of articles. The natural sciences seem to adapt their research strategies to landscapes with large concentrated knowledge clusters, whereas social sciences seem to have adapted to search in landscapes with many small isolated knowledge clusters. Similar bipolar distributions were obtained when comparing levels of insularity estimated by indicators of international collaboration and levels of country-self citations: researchers in academic areas with many journals such as social sciences, arts and humanities, were the most isolated, and that was true in different regions of the world. The work shows that quantitative measures estimating differences between academic disciplines improve our understanding of different research strategies, eventually helping interdisciplinary research and may be also help improve science policies worldwide.     

Influenza A Virus Infection of Human Primary Dendritic Cells Impairs Their Ability to Cross-Present Antigen to CD8 T Cells

Influenza A virus (IAV) infection is normally controlled by adaptive immune responses initiated by dendritic cells (DCs). We investigated the consequences of IAV infection of human primary DCs on their ability to function as antigen-presenting cells. IAV was internalized by both myeloid DCs (mDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs but only mDCs supported viral replication. Although infected mDCs efficiently presented endogenous IAV antigens on MHC class II, this was not the case for presentation on MHC class I. Indeed, cross-presentation by uninfected cells of minute amounts of endocytosed, exogenous IAV was ∼300-fold more efficient than presentation of IAV antigens synthesized by infected cells and resulted in a statistically significant increase in expansion of IAV-specific CD8 T cells. Furthermore, IAV infection also impaired cross-presentation of other exogenous antigens, indicating that IAV infection broadly attenuates presentation on MHC class I molecules. Our results suggest that cross-presentation by uninfected mDCs is a preferred mechanism of antigen-presentation for the activation and expansion of CD8 T cells during IAV infection.     

Binding of Murine Leukemia Virus Gag Polyproteins to KIF4, a Microtubule-Based Motor Protein

A cDNA clone encoding a cellular protein that interacts with murine leukemia virus (MuLV) Gag proteins was isolated from a T-cell lymphoma library. The sequence of the clone is identical to the C terminus of a cellular protein, KIF4, a microtubule-associated motor protein that belongs to the kinesin superfamily. KIF4-MuLV Gag associations have been detected in vitro and in vivo in mammalian cells. We suggest that KIF4 could be involved in Gag polyprotein translocation from the cytoplasm to the cell membrane.