Phosphorylation of Protease-activated Receptor-2 Differentially Regulates Desensitization and Internalization

Protease-activated receptor 2 (PAR2) is a G protein-coupled receptor irreversibly activated by extracellular proteases. Activated PAR2 couples to multiple heterotrimeric G-protein subtypes including Gα_q, Gα_i, and Gα_12/13. Most activated G protein-coupled receptors are rapidly desensitized and internalized following phosphorylation and β-arrestin binding. However, the role of phosphorylation in regulation of PAR2 signaling and trafficking is not known. To investigate the function of phosphorylation, we generated a PAR2 mutant in which all serines and threonines in the C-tail were converted to alanines and designated it PAR2 0P. In mammalian cells, the addition of agonist induced a rapid and robust increase in phosphorylation of wild-type PAR2 but not the 0P mutant, suggesting that the major sites of phosphorylation occur within the C-tail domain. Moreover, desensitization of PAR2 0P signaling was markedly impaired compared with the wild-type receptor. Wild-type phosphorylated PAR2 internalized through a canonical dynamin, clathrin- and β-arrestin-dependent pathway. Strikingly, PAR2 0P mutant internalization proceeded through a dynamin-dependent but clathrin- and β-arrestin-independent pathway in both a constitutive and agonist-dependent manner. Collectively, our studies show that PAR2 phosphorylation is essential for β-arrestin binding and uncoupling from heterotrimeric G-protein signaling and that the presence of serine and threonine residues in the PAR2 C-tail hinder constitutive internalization through a non-canonical pathway. Thus, our studies reveal a novel function for phosphorylation that differentially regulates PAR2 desensitization and endocytic trafficking.     

Regulation of EGF-induced ERK/MAPK activation and EGFR internalization by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

G protein-coupled receptor kinases （GRKs） mediate agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of various G protein-coupled receptors （GPCRs）. We investigate the role of GRK2 on epidermal growth factor （EGF） receptor signaling, including EGF-induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase （ERK/MAPK） activation and EGFR internalization. Immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence experiments show that EGF stimulates GRK2 binding to EGFR complex and GRK2 translocating from cytoplasm to the plasma membrane in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Western blotting assay shows that EGF-induced ERK/MAPK phosphorylation increases 1.9-fold, 1.1-fold and 1.5fold （P〈0.05） at time point 30, 60 and 120 min, respectively when the cells were transfected with GRK2,suggesting the regulatory role of GRK2 on EGF-induced ERK/MAPK activation. Flow cytometry experiments show that GRK2 overexpression has no effect on EGF-induced EGFR internalization, however, it increases agonist-induced G protein-coupled δ5 opioid receptor internalization by approximately 40% （P〈0.01）. Overall,these data suggest that GRK2 has a regulatory role in EGF-induced ERK/MAPK activation, and that the mechanisms underlying the modulatory role of GRK2 in EGFR and GPCR signaling pathways are somewhat different at least in receptor internalization.     

Desensitization and Internalization of Endothelin Receptor A: IMPACT OF G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR KINASE 2 (GRK2)-MEDIATED PHOSPHORYLATION*

Endothelin receptor A (ET_A), a G protein-coupled receptor, mediates endothelin signaling, which is regulated by GRK2. Three Ser and seven Thr residues recently proven to be phosphoacceptor sites are located in the C-terminal extremity (CTE) of the receptor following its palmitoylation site. We created various phosphorylation-deficient ET_A mutants. The phospholipase C activity of mutant receptors in HEK-293 cells was analyzed during continuous endothelin stimulation to investigate the impact of phosphorylation sites on ET_A desensitization. Total deletion of phosphoacceptor sites in the CTE affected proper receptor regulation. However, proximal and distal phosphoacceptor sites both turned out to be sufficient to induce WT-like desensitization. Overexpression of the Gα_q coupling-deficient mutant GRK2-D110A suppressed ET_A-WT signaling but failed to decrease phospholipase C activity mediated by the phosphorylation-deficient mutant ET_A-6PD. In contrast, GRK2-WT acted on both receptors, whereas the kinase-inactive mutant GRK2-D110A/K220R failed to inhibit signaling of ET_A-WT and ET_A-6PD. This demonstrates that ET_A desensitization involves at least two autonomous GRK2-mediated components: 1) a phosphorylation-independent signal decrease mediated by blocking of Gα_q and 2) a mechanism involving phosphorylation of Ser and Thr residues in the CTE of the receptor in a redundant fashion, able to incorporate either proximal or distal phosphoacceptor sites. High level transfection of GRK2 variants influenced signaling of ET_A-WT and ET_A-6PD and hints at an additional phosphorylation-independent regulatory mechanism. Furthermore, internalization of mRuby-tagged receptors was observed with ET_A-WT and the phosphorylation-deficient mutant ET_A-14PD (lacking 14 phosphoacceptor sites) and turned out to be based on a phosphorylation-independent mechanism.     

Novel roles for arrestins in the post-endocytic trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of transmembrane signaling molecules in the human genome. As such, they interact with numerous intracellular molecules, which can act either to propagate or curtail signaling from the receptor. Their primary mode of cellular activation occurs through heterotrimeric G proteins, which in turn can activate a wide spectrum of effector molecules, including phosphodiesterases, phospholipases, adenylyl cyclases and ion channels. Active GPCRs are also the target of G protein-coupled receptor kinases, which phosphorylate the receptors culminating in the binding of the protein arrestin. This results in rapid desensitization through inhibition of G protein binding, as well as novel mechanisms of cellular activation that involve the scaffolding of cellular kinases to GPCR-arrestin complexes. Arrestins can also serve to mediate the internalization of certain GPCRs, a process which plays an important role in regulating cellular activity both by mediating long-term desensitization through down regulation (degradation) of receptors and by recycling desensitized receptors back to the cell surface to initiate additional rounds of signaling. The mechanisms that regulate the subsequent intracellular trafficking of GPCRs following internalization are largely unknown. Recently however, it has become clear that the pattern of receptor phosphorylation and subsequent binding of arrestin play a critical role in the intracellular trafficking of internalized receptors, thereby dictating the ultimate fate of the receptor. In addition, arrestins have now been shown to be required for the recycling of GPCRs that are capable of internalizing through arrestin-independent mechanisms. This review will summarize recent advances in our understanding of the roles of arrestins in post-endocytic GPCR trafficking.     

Differential phosphorylation paradigms dictate desensitization and internalization of the N-formyl peptide receptor.

Following activation by ligand, most G protein-coupled receptors undergo rapid phosphorylation. This is accompanied by a drastic decrease in the efficacy of continued or repeated stimulation, due to receptor uncoupling from G protein and receptor internalization. Such processing steps have been shown to be absolutely dependent on receptor phosphorylation in the case of the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR). In this study, we report results that indicate that the mechanisms responsible for desensitization and internalization are distinct. Using site-directed mutagenesis of the serine and threonine residues of the FPR carboxyl terminus, we have characterized regions that differentially regulate these two processes. Whereas substitution of all 11 Ser/Thr residues in the carboxyl terminus prevents both desensitization and internalization, substitution of four Ser/Thr residues between 328-332 blocks desensitization but has no effect on internalization. Similarly, substitution of four Ser/Thr residues between positions 334 and 339 results in a deficit in desensitization but again no decrease in internalization, suggesting that phosphorylation at either site evokes receptor internalization, whereas maximal desensitization requires phosphorylation at both sites. These results also indicate that receptor internalization is not involved in the process of desensitization. Further analysis of the residues between 328-332 revealed that restoration either of Ser(328) and Thr(329) or of Thr(331) and Ser(332) was sufficient to restore desensitization, suggesting that phosphorylation within either of these two sites, in addition to sites between residues 334 and 339, is sufficient to produce desensitization. Taken together, these results indicate that the mechanisms involved in FPR processing (uncoupling from G proteins and internalization) are regulated differentially by phosphorylation at distinct sites within the carboxyl terminus of the FPR. The relevance of this paradigm to other G protein-coupled receptors is discussed.     

G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase-mediated Phosphorylation Regulates Post-endocytic Trafficking of the D2 Dopamine Receptor

We investigated the role of G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-mediated phosphorylation in agonist-induced desensitization, arrestin association, endocytosis, and intracellular trafficking of the D₂ dopamine receptor (DAR). Agonist activation of D₂ DARs results in rapid and sustained receptor phosphorylation that is solely mediated by GRKs. A survey of GRKs revealed that only GRK2 or GRK3 promotes D₂ DAR phosphorylation. Mutational analyses resulted in the identification of eight serine/threonine residues within the third cytoplasmic loop of the receptor that are phosphorylated by GRK2/3. Simultaneous mutation of these eight residues results in a receptor construct, GRK(-), that is completely devoid of agonist-promoted GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation. We found that both wild-type (WT) and GRK(-) receptors underwent a similar degree of agonist-induced desensitization as assessed using [³⁵S]GTPγS binding assays. Similarly, both receptor constructs internalized to the same extent in response to agonist treatment. Furthermore, using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays to directly assess receptor association with arrestin3, we found no differences between the WT and GRK(-) receptors. Thus, phosphorylation is not required for arrestin-receptor association or agonist-induced desensitization or internalization. In contrast, when we examined recycling of the D₂ DARs to the cell surface, subsequent to agonist-induced endocytosis, the GRK(-) construct exhibited less recycling in comparison with the WT receptor. This impairment appears to be due to a greater propensity of the GRK(-) receptors to down-regulate once internalized. In contrast, if the receptor is highly phosphorylated, then receptor recycling is promoted. These results reveal a novel role for GRK-mediated phosphorylation in regulating the post-endocytic trafficking of a G protein-coupled receptor.Dopamine receptors (DARs)³ are members of the GPCR superfamily and consist of five structurally distinct subtypes (1, 2). These can be divided into two subfamilies on the basis of their structure and pharmacological and transductional properties (3). The “D₁-like” subfamily includes the D₁ and D₅ receptors, which couple to the heterotrimeric G proteins G_S or G_OLF to stimulate adenylyl cyclase activity and raise intracellular levels of cAMP. The D₂-like subfamily includes the D₂, D₃, and D₄ receptors, which couple to inhibitory G_i/o proteins to reduce adenylyl cyclase activity as well as modulate voltage-gated K⁺ or Ca²⁺ channels. Within the central nervous system, these receptors modulate movement, learning and memory, reward and addiction, cognition, and certain neurendocrine functions. As with other GPCRs, the DARs are subject to a wide variety of regulatory mechanisms, which can either positively or negatively modulate their expression and functional activity (4).Upon agonist activation, most GPCRs undergo desensitization, a homeostatic process that results in a waning of receptor response despite continued agonist stimulation (5, 6). Desensitization is believed to involve the phosphorylation of receptors by either G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and/or second messenger-activated kinases such as PKA or PKC. Homologous forms of desensitization involve only agonist-activated receptors and appear to be primarily mediated by GRKs. In many cases, GRK-mediated phosphorylation has been shown to decrease receptor/G protein interactions and also initiate arrestin binding, which further promotes endocytosis of the receptor through clathrin-coated pits (7–9). Once internalized, GPCRs can engage additional signaling pathways (10), be sorted for recycling to the plasma membrane, or targeted for degradation (7–9). Among the DARs, the D₂ receptor is arguably one of the most validated drug targets in neurology and psychiatry. For instance, all receptor-based anti-parkinsonian drugs work via stimulating the D₂ DAR (11), whereas all Food and Drug Administration-approved antipsychotic agents are antagonists of this receptor subtype (12, 13). The D₂ DAR is also therapeutically targeted in other disorders such as restless legs syndrome, tardive dyskinesia, Tourette syndrome, and hyperprolactinemia. As such, more knowledge concerning the regulation of the D₂ DAR could be helpful in improving current therapies or devising new treatment strategies.In comparison with other GPCRs, however, detailed mechanistic information concerning regulation of the D₂ DAR is mostly lacking, although some progress has recently been made. For instance, we (14) and others (15) have found that PKC-mediated phosphorylation can regulate both D₂ receptor desensitization and trafficking. In our PKC study, we mapped out all of the PKC phosphorylation sites within the third intracellular loop (IC3) of the receptor, and we determined the existence of two PKC phosphorylation domains. Both of these domains were found to regulate receptor sequestration, whereas only one domain regulated functional uncoupling in response to PKC activation (14). In response to agonist activation, the D₂ DAR has also been shown to undergo functional desensitization (4), although this has not been intensively investigated. More thoroughly examined is the observation that agonist stimulation of the D₂ DAR promotes its sequestration from the cell surface into vesicular compartments that appear distinct from those harboring internalized D₁ DARs or β-adrenergic receptors (16–21). In addition to uncertainty over the endocytic pathway involved, controversy also exists as to whether or not D₂ DAR internalization is dynamin-dependent and whether the internalized receptors can partially or completely recycle to the cell surface or, alternatively, if they undergo degradation (19, 21–24). The D₂ DAR does appear to undergo GRK-mediated phosphorylation upon agonist activation, which has been suggested to promote arrestin association and receptor sequestration (16, 19, 25), although this process has not been studied in detail and its relationship to functional receptor desensitization is unknown.In this study, we have further characterized GRK-mediated phosphorylation of the D₂ DAR and determined its role in agonist-induced receptor desensitization, internalization, and recycling. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we have mapped out all of the GRK phosphorylation sites within the D₂ DAR and determined that these are distinct from the PKC phosphorylation sites. Using a GRK phosphorylation-null mutant receptor, we found, surprisingly, that GRK-mediated phosphorylation is not actually required for agonist-induced receptor desensitization, arrestin association, or internalization. In contrast, we found that the GRK phosphorylation-null receptor was impaired in its ability to recycle to the cell surface subsequent to internalization and was degraded to a greater extent in comparison with the wild-type receptor. These results suggest that GRK-mediated phosphorylation of the D₂ DAR regulates its intracellular trafficking or sorting once internalized, a novel mechanism for GRK-mediated regulation of GPCR function.     

A Long Lasting β1 Adrenergic Receptor Stimulation of cAMP/Protein Kinase A (PKA) Signal in Cardiac Myocytes

Small-molecule, ligand-activated G protein-coupled receptors are generally thought to be rapidly desensitized within a period of minutes through receptor phosphorylation and internalization after repeated or prolonged stimulation. This transient G protein-coupled receptor activation remains at odds with many observed long-lasting cellular and physiological responses. Here, using live cell imaging of cAMP with a FRET-based biosensor and myocyte contraction assay, we show that the catecholamine-activated β₁ adrenergic receptor (β₁AR) continuously stimulates second messenger cAMP synthesis in primary cardiac myocytes and neurons, which lasts for more than 8 h (a decay t_½ of 3.9 h) in cardiac myocytes. However, the β₁AR-induced cAMP signal is counterbalanced and masked by the receptor-bound phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4D8-dependent cAMP hydrolysis. Inhibition of PDE4 activity recovers the receptor-induced cAMP signal and promotes contractile response in mouse hearts during extended periods of agonist stimulation. β₁AR associates with PDE4D8 through the receptor C-terminal PDZ motif-dependent binding to synaptic-associated protein 97 (SAP97). Knockdown of SAP97 or mutation of the β₁AR PDZ motif disrupts the complex and promotes sustained agonist-induced cAMP activity, PKA phosphorylation, and cardiac myocyte contraction response. Together, these findings unveil a long lasting adrenergic signal in neurons and myocytes under prolonged stimulation and an underappreciated role of PDE that is essential in classic receptor signaling desensitization and in maintaining a long lasting cAMP equilibrium for ligand-induced physiological response.     

Mutation of Three Residues in the Third Intracellular Loop of the Dopamine D2 Receptor Creates an Internalization-defective Receptor

Arrestins mediate desensitization and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors and also direct receptor signaling toward heterotrimeric G protein-independent signaling pathways. We previously identified a four-residue segment (residues 212–215) of the dopamine D2 receptor that is necessary for arrestin binding in an in vitro heterologous expression system but that also impairs receptor expression. We now describe the characterization of additional mutations at that arrestin binding site in the third intracellular loop. Mutating two (residues 214 and 215) or three (residues 213–215) of the four residues to alanine partially decreased agonist-induced recruitment of arrestin3 without altering activation of a G protein. Arrestin-dependent receptor internalization, which requires arrestin binding to β2-adaptin (the β2 subunit of the clathrin-associated adaptor protein AP2) and clathrin, was disproportionately affected by the three-residue mutation, with no agonist-induced internalization observed even in the presence of overexpressed arrestin or G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. The disjunction between arrestin recruitment and internalization could not be explained by alterations in the time course of the receptor-arrestin interaction, the recruitment of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, or the receptor-induced interaction between arrestin and β2-adaptin, suggesting that the mutation impairs a property of the internalization complex that has not yet been identified.     

V1b vasopressin receptor trafficking and signaling: Role of arrestins,G proteins and Src kinase

The signaling pathway of G protein‐coupled receptors is strongly linked to their trafficking profile. Little is known about the molecular mechanisms involved in the vasopressin receptor V_1b subtype (V_1bR) trafficking and its impact on receptor signaling and regulation. For this purpose, we investigated the role of β‐arrestins in receptor desensitization, internalization and recycling and attempted to dissect the V_1bR‐mediated MAP kinase pathway. Using MEF cells Knocked‐out for β‐arrestins 1 and 2, we demonstrated that both β‐arrestins 1 and 2 play a fundamental role in internalization and recycling of V_1bR with a rapid and transient V_1bR‐β‐arrestin interaction in contrast to a slow and long‐lasting β‐arrestin recruitment of the V₂ vasopressin receptor subtype (V₂R). Using V_1bR‐V₂R chimeras and V_1bR C‐terminus truncations, we demonstrated the critical role of the V_1bR C‐terminus in its interaction with β‐arrestins thereby regulating the receptor internalization and recycling kinetics in a phosphorylation‐independent manner. In parallel, V_1bR MAP kinase activation was dependent on arrestins and Src‐kinase but independent on G proteins. Interestingly, Src interacted with hV_1bR at basal state and dissociated when receptor internalization occurred. Altogether, our data describe for the first time the trafficking profile and MAP kinase pathway of V_1bR involving both arrestins and Src kinase family.      

G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 phosphorylation of hip regulates internalization of the chemokine receptor CXCR4

Regulation of the magnitude, duration, and localization of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling responses is controlled by desensitization, internalization, and downregulation of the activated receptor. Desensitization is initiated by the phosphorylation of the activated receptor by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and the binding of the adaptor protein arrestin. In addition to phosphorylating activated GPCRs, GRKs have been shown to phosphorylate a variety of additional substrates. An in vitro screen for novel GRK substrates revealed Hsp70 interacting protein (Hip) as a substrate. GRK5, but not GRK2, bound to and stoichiometrically phosphorylated Hip in vitro. The primary binding domain of GRK5 was mapped to residues 303-319 on Hip, while the major site of phosphorylation was identified to be Ser-346. GRK5 also bound to and phosphorylated Hip on Ser-346 in cells. While Hip was previously implicated in chemokine receptor trafficking, we found that the phosphorylation of Ser-346 was required for proper agonist-induced internalization of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Taken together, Hip has been identified as a novel substrate of GRK5 in vitro and in cells, and phosphorylation of Hip by GRK5 plays a role in modulating CXCR4 internalization.     

Allosteric Modulation of M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Internalization and Subcellular Trafficking

Allosteric modulators are an attractive approach to achieve receptor subtype-selective targeting of G protein-coupled receptors. Benzyl quinolone carboxylic acid (BQCA) is an unprecedented example of a highly selective positive allosteric modulator of the M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR). However, despite favorable pharmacological characteristics of BQCA in vitro and in vivo, there is limited evidence of the impact of allosteric modulation on receptor regulatory mechanisms such as β-arrestin recruitment or receptor internalization and endocytic trafficking. In the present study we investigated the impact of BQCA on M₁ mAChR regulation. We show that BQCA potentiates agonist-induced β-arrestin recruitment to M₁ mAChRs. Using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer approach to monitor intracellular trafficking of M₁ mAChRs, we show that once internalized, M₁ mAChRs traffic to early endosomes, recycling endosomes and late endosomes. We also show that BQCA potentiates agonist-induced subcellular trafficking. M₁ mAChR internalization is both β-arrestin and G protein-dependent, with the third intracellular loop playing an important role in the dynamics of β-arrestin recruitment. As the global effect of receptor activation ultimately depends on the levels of receptor expression at the cell surface, these results illustrate the need to extend the characterization of novel allosteric modulators of G protein-coupled receptors to encapsulate the consequences of chronic exposure to this family of ligands.     

Activation of NPFF2 receptor stimulates neurite outgrowth in Neuro 2A cells through activation of ERK signaling pathway

Neurite outgrowth is an important process in neural regeneration and plasticity, especially after neural injury, and recent evidence indicates that several G_αi/o protein-coupled receptors play an important role in neurite outgrowth. The neuropeptide (NP)FF system contains two G_αi/o protein-coupled receptors, NPFF₁ and NPFF₂ receptors, which are mainly distributed in the central nervous system. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the NPFF system is involved in neurite outgrowth in Neuro 2A cells. We showed that Neuro 2A cells endogenously expressed NPFF₂ receptor, and the NPFF₂ receptor agonist dNPA inhibited cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production stimulated by forskolin in Neuro 2A cells. We also demonstrated that NPFF and dNPA dose-dependently induced neurite outgrowth in Neuro 2A cells, which was completely abolished by the NPFF receptor antagonist RF9. Pretreatment with mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors PD98059 and U0126 decreased dNPA-induced neurite outgrowth. In addition, dNPA increased phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in Neuro 2A cells, which was completely antagonized by pretreatment with U0126. Our results suggest that activation of NPFF₂ receptor stimulates neurite outgrowth in Neuro 2A cells through activation of the ERK signaling pathway. Moreover, NPFF₂ receptor may be a potential therapeutic target for neural injury and degeneration in the future.     

CCK receptor phosphorylation exposes regulatory domains affecting phosphorylation and receptor trafficking

Agonist-stimulatedphosphorylation of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (Gprotein)-coupled receptors has been recognized as an importantmechanism for desensitization by interfering with coupling of theactivated receptor with its G protein. We recently described a mutantof the CCK receptor that modified two of five key sites ofphosphorylation (S260,264A) and eliminated agonist-stimulated receptorphosphorylation, despite normal ligand binding and signaling (20). As expected, this nonphosphorylated mutant hadimpaired rapid desensitization but was ultimately able to bedesensitized by normal receptor internalization. Here we demonstratethat this mutant receptor is also defective in resensitization, withabnormal recycling to the cell surface. To explore this, anotherreceptor mutant was prepared, replacing the same serines withaspartates to mimic the charge of serine-phosphate (S260,264D). Thismutant was expressed in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line and shown to bind CCK normally. It had accelerated kinetics of signaling and desensitization and was phosphorylated in response to agonist occupation, with all other normal sites of phosphorylation modified. Itwas internalized like wild-type receptors and was resensitized andtrafficked normally. This provides evidence for an additional importantfunction for phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors. Phosphorylation may induce a conformational change in the receptor toexpose other potential sites of phosphorylation and to expose domainsinvolved in the targeting and trafficking of endosomes. Thehierarchical phosphorylation of these sites may play a key role inreceptor regulation.

     

Engineered G protein coupled receptors reveal independent regulation of internalization,desensitization and acute signaling

Background  

The physiological regulation of G protein-coupled receptors, through desensitization and internalization, modulates the length of the receptor signal and may influence the development of tolerance and dependence in response to chronic drug treatment. To explore the importance of receptor regulation, we engineered a series of G_i-coupled receptors that differ in signal length, degree of agonist-induced internalization, and ability to induce adenylyl cyclase superactivation. All of these receptors, based on the kappa opioid receptor, were modified to be receptors activated solely by synthetic ligands (RASSLs). This modification allows us to compare receptors that have the same ligands and effectors, but differ only in desensitization and internalization.     

Techniques for assessing knee joint pain in arthritis

Background

In general, opioids that induce the recycling of μ-opioid receptors (MORs) promote little desensitization, although morphine is one exception to this rule. While morphine fails to provoke significant internalization of MORs in cultured cells, it does stimulate profound desensitization. In contrast, morphine does promote some internalization of MORs in neurons although this does not prevent this opioid from inducing strong antinociceptive tolerance.

Results

In neurons, morphine stimulates the long-lasting transfer of MOR-activated Gα subunits to proteins of the RGS-R7 and RGS-Rz subfamilies. We investigated the influence of this regulatory process on the capacity of morphine to promote desensitization and its association with MOR recycling in the mature nervous system. In parallel, we also studied the effects of [D-Ala², N-MePhe⁴, Gly-ol⁵] encephalin (DAMGO), a potent inducer of MOR internalization that promotes little tolerance. We observed that the initial exposure to icv morphine caused no significant internalization of MORs but rather, a fraction of the Gα subunits was stably transferred to RGS proteins in a time-dependent manner. As a result, the antinociception produced by a second dose of morphine administered 6 h after the first was weaker. However, this opioid now stimulated the phosphorylation, internalization and recycling of MORs, and further exposure to morphine promoted little tolerance to this moderate antinociception. In contrast, the initial dose of DAMGO stimulated intense phosphorylation and internalization of the MORs associated with a transient transfer of Gα subunits to the RGS proteins, recovering MOR control shortly after the effects of the opioid had ceased. Accordingly, the recycled MORs re-established their association with G proteins and the neurons were rapidly resensitized to DAMGO.

Conclusion

In the nervous system, morphine induces a strong desensitization before promoting the phosphorylation and recycling of MORs. The long-term sequestering of morphine-activated Gα subunits by certain RGS proteins reduces the responses to this opioid in neurons. This phenomenon probably increases free Gβγ dimers in the receptor environment and leads to GRK phosphorylation and internalization of the MORs. Although, the internalization of the MORs permits the transfer of opioid-activated Gα subunits to the RGSZ2 proteins, it interferes with the stabilization of this regulatory process and recycled MORs recover the control on these Gα subunits and opioid tolerance develops slowly.     

Characterization of RANTES- and aminooxypentane-RANTES-triggered desensitization signals reveals differences in recruitment of the G protein-coupled receptor complex.

The trafficking of lymphocyte populations is a complex process controlled by a vast array of molecules. In this process, cells must be able to sense small changes in chemoattractant gradients. Migration through a chemotactic gradient probably employs an on-off mechanism in which chemokine receptor desensitization, internalization, and recycling may be important steps. This multistep process requires the coordinated action of many factors, including G protein-coupled receptor kinases, arrestins, clathrin, and GTP-hydrolyzing proteins such as dynamin. In this report, we show that RANTES and its derivative, aminooxypentane (AOP)-RANTES, a potent RANTES antagonist as well as an inhibitor of HIV-1 infection, both promote CCR5 desensitization involving G protein-coupled receptor kinases-2 and beta-arrestin equally well. An important difference between the two molecules is that (AOP)-RANTES is more efficient than RANTES in promoting Ser/Thr phosphorylation of the receptor and association of G protein-coupled receptor kinases-2, beta-arrestin, and clathrin to the CCR5. After stimulation with either ligand, we observe rapid, transient association of dynamin to CCR5, implicating this protein in receptor sensitization, but this association is faster and longer-lasting following (AOP)-RANTES stimulation. In summary, we show that chemokine receptor internalization takes place through the formation of clathrin vesicles and involves dynamin activity. We provide compelling evidence that the differences between RANTES and (AOP)-RANTES in G alpha i activation condition subsequent signaling events, including internalization and receptor recycling.     

Agonist-dependent μ-opioid receptor signaling can lead to heterologous desensitization

Desensitization of the µ-opioid receptor (MOR) has been implicated as an important regulatory process in the development of tolerance to opiates. Monitoring the release of intracellular Ca²⁺ ([Ca²⁺]_i), we reported that [D-Ala², N-Me-Phe⁴, Gly⁵-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO)-induced receptor desensitization requires receptor phosphorylation and recruitment of β-arrestins (βArrs), while morphine-induced receptor desensitization does not. In current studies, we established that morphine-induced MOR desensitization is protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent. By using RNA interference techniques and subtype specific inhibitors, PKCε was shown to be the PKC subtype activated by morphine and the subtype responsible for morphine-induced desensitization. In contrast, DAMGO did not increase PKCε activity and DAMGO-induced MOR desensitization was not affected by modulating PKCε activity. Among the various proteins within the receptor signaling complex, Gαi2 was phosphorylated by morphine-activated PKCε. Moreover, mutating three putative PKC phosphorylation sites, Ser⁴⁴, Ser¹⁴⁴ and Ser³⁰² on Gαi2 to Ala attenuated morphine-induced, but not DAMGO-induced desensitization. In addition, pretreatment with morphine desensitized cannabinoid receptor CB1 agonist WIN 55212-2-induced [Ca²⁺]_i release, and this desensitization could be reversed by pretreating the cells with PKCε inhibitor or overexpressing Gαi2 with the putative PKC phosphorylation sites mutated. Thus, depending on the agonist, activation of MOR could lead to heterologous desensitization and probable crosstalk between MOR and other Gαi-coupled receptors, such as the CB1.     

Identification of a neuronal calcium sensor (NCS-1) possibly involved in the regulation of receptor phosphorylation

Abstract

Persistent stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors by agonists leads rapidly to reduced responses, a phenomenon described as desensitization. It involves primarily the phosphorylation of receptor sites by specific kinases of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family. The β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 (GRK2) desensitizes agonist-activated β₂-adrenergic receptors, whereas rhodopsin kinase (GRK1) phosphorylates and inactivates photon-activated rhodopsin. Little is known about the role of calcium in desensitization. Here we report the characterization of a novel neuronal calcium sensor (NCS) named NCS-1 possibly involved in the regulation of receptor phosphorylation. NCS-1 is a new member of the EF-hand superfamily, which includes calmodulin, troponin C, parvalbumin, and recoverins. By Northern analysis and in situ hybridization, we discovered that NCS-1 is specifically expressed in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Chick NCS-1 has 72% of amino acid identity with Drosophila frequenin, a protein found in the nervous system and at the motor nerve terminals of neuromuscular junctions. By analogy with the reported function for two other members of the NCS family, we discuss whether G protein-coupled receptors or GRKs are the targets of neuronal calcium sensors.     

Agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization of the P2Y2 nucleotide receptor

Purification of HA-tagged P2Y₂ receptors from transfected human 1321N1 astrocytoma cells yielded a protein with a molecular size determined by SDS-PAGE to be in the range of 57–76 kDa, which is typical of membrane glycoproteins with heterogeneous complex glycosylation. The protein phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid, attenuated the recovery of receptor activity from the agonist-induced desensitized state, suggesting a role for P2Y₂ receptor phosphorylation in desensitization. Isolation of HA-tagged P2Y₂ nucleotide receptors from metabolically [³²P]-labelled cells indicated a (3.8 ± 0.2)-fold increase in the [³²P]-content of the receptor after 15 min of treatment with 100 μM UTP, as compared to immunoprecipitated receptors from untreated control cells. Receptor sequestration studies indicated that ∼40% of the surface receptors were internalized after a 15-min stimulation with 100 μM UTP. Point mutation of three potential GRK and PKC phosphorylation sites in the third intracellular loop and C-terminal tail of the P2Y₂ receptor (namely, S243A, T344A, and S356A) extinguished agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation, caused a marked reduction in the efficacy of UTP to desensitize P2Y₂ receptor signalling to intracellular calcium mobilization, and impaired agonist-induced receptor internalization. Activation of PKC isoforms with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate that caused heterologous receptor desensitization did not increase the level of P2Y₂ receptor phosphorylation. Our results indicate a role for receptor phosphorylation by phorbol-insensitive protein kinases in agonist-induced desensitization of the P2Y₂ nucleotide receptor. (Mol Cell Biochem xxx: 35–45, 2005)     

Mapping the Putative G Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR) Docking Site on GPCR Kinase 2: INSIGHTS FROM INTACT CELL PHOSPHORYLATION AND RECRUITMENT ASSAYS*

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate agonist-occupied receptors initiating the processes of desensitization and β-arrestin-dependent signaling. Interaction of GRKs with activated receptors serves to stimulate their kinase activity. The extreme N-terminal helix (αN), the kinase small lobe, and the active site tether (AST) of the AGC kinase domain have previously been implicated in mediating the allosteric activation. Expanded mutagenesis of the αN and AST allowed us to further assess the role of these two regions in kinase activation and receptor phosphorylation in vitro and in intact cells. We also developed a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay to monitor the recruitment of GRK2 to activated α_2A-adrenergic receptors (α_2AARs) in living cells. The bioluminescence resonance energy transfer signal exhibited a biphasic response to norepinephrine concentration, suggesting that GRK2 is recruited to Gβγ and α_2AAR with EC₅₀ values of 15 nm and 8 μm, respectively. We show that mutations in αN (L4A, V7E, L8E, V11A, S12A, Y13A, and M17A) and AST (G475I, V477D, and I485A) regions impair or potentiate receptor phosphorylation and/or recruitment. We suggest that a surface of GRK2, including Leu⁴, Val⁷, Leu⁸, Val¹¹, and Ser¹², directly interacts with receptors, whereas residues such as Asp¹⁰, Tyr¹³, Ala¹⁶, Met¹⁷, Gly⁴⁷⁵, Val⁴⁷⁷, and Ile⁴⁸⁵ are more important for kinase domain closure and activation. Taken together with data on GRK1 and GRK6, our data suggest that all three GRK subfamilies make conserved interactions with G protein-coupled receptors, but there may be unique interactions that influence selectivity.