基于药物毒性反应等级的Up-and-Down设计

Ⅰ期临床试验主要关心毒性,通常划分毒性为五个水平．简单起见,同时兼顾伦理问题,Ⅰ期临床试验通常采用up-and-down序贯设计(例如BCDⅠ,BCDⅡ,K-in-a-row,Narayana,Improved Narayana)．然而,在分配剂量水平时,该设计没有区分已经试验了的病人的严重毒性水平等级,从而有可能分配给病人更高毒性的剂量水平．因此,本文提出了基于药物毒性等级确定最大耐受剂量的up-and-down设计方法,并进一步研究了该设计方法在各种变化的剂量—毒性关系下的运作特征,并且和标准的up-and-down设计作模拟比较,结果表明该设计方法对Ⅰ期临床试验设计的剂量建议具有重要意义．     

An alternative metric for evaluating the potential patient benefit of response-adaptive randomization procedures

When planning a two-arm group sequential clinical trial with a binary primary outcome that has severe implications for quality of life (e.g., mortality), investigators may strive to find the design that maximizes in-trial patient benefit. In such cases, Bayesian response-adaptive randomization (BRAR) is often considered because it can alter the allocation ratio throughout the trial in favor of the treatment that is currently performing better. Although previous studies have recommended using fixed randomization over BRAR based on patient benefit metrics calculated from the realized trial sample size, these previous comparisons have been limited by failures to hold type I and II error rates constant across designs or consider the impacts on all individuals directly affected by the design choice. In this paper, we propose a metric for comparing designs with the same type I and II error rates that reflects expected outcomes among individuals who would participate in the trial if enrollment is open when they become eligible. We demonstrate how to use the proposed metric to guide the choice of design in the context of two recent trials in persons suffering out of hospital cardiac arrest. Using computer simulation, we demonstrate that various implementations of group sequential BRAR offer modest improvements with respect to the proposed metric relative to conventional group sequential monitoring alone.     

Adaptive trial designs: a review of barriers and opportunities

ABSTRACT: Adaptive designs allow planned modifications based on data accumulating within a study. The promise of greater flexibility and efficiency stimulates increasing interest in adaptive designs from clinical, academic, and regulatory parties. When adaptive designs are used properly, efficiencies can include a smaller sample size, a more efficient treatment development process, and an increased chance of correctly answering the clinical question of interest. However, improper adaptations can lead to biased studies. A broad definition of adaptive designs allows for countless variations, which creates confusion as to the statistical validity and practical feasibility of many designs. Determining properties of a particular adaptive design requires careful consideration of the scientific context and statistical assumptions. We first review several adaptive designs that garner the most current interest. We focus on the design principles and research issues that lead to particular designs being appealing or unappealing in particular applications. We separately discuss exploratory and confirmatory stage designs in order to account for the differences in regulatory concerns. We include adaptive seamless designs, which combine stages in a unified approach. We also highlight a number of applied areas, such as comparative effectiveness research, that would benefit from the use of adaptive designs. Finally, we describe a number of current barriers and provide initial suggestions for overcoming them in order to promote wider use of appropriate adaptive designs. Given the breadth of the coverage all mathematical and most implementation details are omitted for the sake of brevity. However, the interested reader will find that we provide current references to focused reviews and original theoretical sources which lead to details of the current state of the art in theory and practice.     

Using partition designs to enhance purification process understanding

Characterization of purification processes by identifying significant input parameters and establishing predictive models is vital to developing robust processes. Current experimental design approaches restrict analysis to one process step at a time, which can severely limit the ability to identify interactions between process steps. This can be overcome by the use of partition designs which can model multiple, sequential process steps simultaneously. This paper presents the application of partition designs to a monoclonal antibody purification process. Three sequential purification steps were modeled using both traditional experimental designs and partition designs and the results compared as a proof of concept study. The partition and traditional design approaches identified the same input parameters within each process step that significantly affected the product quality output examined. The partition design also identified significant interactions between input parameters across process steps that could not be uncovered by the traditional approach. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;107: 814–824. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Nonparametric and semiparametric group sequential methods for comparing accuracy of diagnostic tests

SUMMARY: Comparison of the accuracy of two diagnostic tests using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from two diagnostic tests has been typically conducted using fixed sample designs. On the other hand, the human experimentation inherent in a comparison of diagnostic modalities argues for periodic monitoring of the accruing data to address many issues related to the ethics and efficiency of the medical study. To date, very little research has been done on the use of sequential sampling plans for comparative ROC studies, even when these studies may use expensive and unsafe diagnostic procedures. In this article we propose a nonparametric group sequential design plan. The nonparametric sequential method adapts a nonparametric family of weighted area under the ROC curve statistics (Wieand et al., 1989, Biometrika 76, 585-592) and a group sequential sampling plan. We illustrate the implementation of this nonparametric approach for sequentially comparing ROC curves in the context of diagnostic screening for nonsmall-cell lung cancer. We also describe a semiparametric sequential method based on proportional hazard models. We compare the statistical properties of the nonparametric approach with alternative semiparametric and parametric analyses in simulation studies. The results show the nonparametric approach is robust to model misspecification and has excellent finite-sample performance.     

A unified association analysis approach for family and unrelated samples correcting for stratification

There are two common designs for association mapping of complex diseases: case-control and family-based designs. A case-control sample is more powerful to detect genetic effects than a family-based sample that contains the same numbers of affected and unaffected persons, although additional markers may be required to control for spurious association. When family and unrelated samples are available, statistical analyses are often performed in the family and unrelated samples separately, conditioning on parental information for the former, thus resulting in reduced power. In this report, we propose a unified approach that can incorporate both family and case-control samples and, provided the additional markers are available, at the same time corrects for population stratification. We apply the principal components of a marker matrix to adjust for the effect of population stratification. This unified approach makes it unnecessary to perform a conditional analysis of the family data and is more powerful than the separate analyses of unrelated and family samples, or a meta-analysis performed by combining the results of the usual separate analyses. This property is demonstrated in both a variety of simulation models and empirical data. The proposed approach can be equally applied to the analysis of both qualitative and quantitative traits.     

Symmetric group sequential test designs

In Phase III clinical trials, ethical considerations often demand interim analyses in order that the better treatment be made available to all patients as soon as possible. Group sequential test designs that do not treat the hypotheses symmetrically may not fully address this concern since early termination of the study may be easier under one of the hypotheses. We present a one-parameter family of symmetric one-sided group sequential designs that are nearly fully efficient in terms of the average sample number. The symmetric tests are then extended to a two-sided hypothesis test. These symmetric two-sided group sequential tests are found to have improved overall efficiency when compared to the tests proposed by Pocock (1977, Biometrika 64, 191-199) and O'Brien and Fleming (1979, Biometrics 35, 549-556). Tables of critical values for both one-sided and two-sided symmetric designs are provided, thus allowing easy determination of sample sizes and stopping boundaries for a group sequential test. Approximate tests based on these designs are proposed for use when the number and timing of analyses are random.     

Sequential designs for ordinal phase I clinical trials

Sequential designs for phase I clinical trials which incorporate maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) as data accrue are inherently problematic because of limited data for estimation early on. We address this problem for small phase I clinical trials with ordinal responses. In particular, we explore the problem of the nonexistence of the MLE of the logistic parameters under a proportional odds model with one predictor. We incorporate the probability of an undetermined MLE as a restriction, as well as ethical considerations, into a proposed sequential optimal approach, which consists of a start‐up design, a follow‐on design and a sequential dose‐finding design. Comparisons with nonparametric sequential designs are also performed based on simulation studies with parameters drawn from a real data set.     

Optimal response-adaptive designs for continuous responses in phase III trials

Optimal response-adaptive designs in phase III clinical trial set up are gaining more interest. Most of the available designs are not based on any optimal consideration. An optimal design for binary responses is given by Rosenberger et al. (2001) and one for continuous responses is provided by Biswas and Mandal (2004). Recently, Zhang and Rosenberger (2006) proposed another design for normal responses. This paper illustrates that the Zhang and Rosenberger (2006) design is not suitable for normally distributed responses, in general. The approach cannot be extended for other continuous response cases, such as exponential or gamma. In this paper, we first describe when the optimal design of Zhang and Rosenberger (2006) fails. We then suggest the appropriate adjustments for designs in different continuous distributions. A unified framework to find optimal response-adaptive designs for two competing treatments is proposed. The proposed methods are illustrated using some real data.     

Group screening for rare events based on incomplete block designs

Fields such as, diagnostic testing, biotherapeutics, drug development, and toxicology among others, center on the premise of searching through many specimens for a rare event. Scientists in the business of “searching for a needle in a haystack” may greatly benefit from the use of group screening design strategies. Group screening, where specimens are composited into pools with each pool being tested for the presence of the event, can be much more cost-efficient than testing each individual specimen. A number of group screening designs have been proposed in the literature. Incomplete block screening designs are described here and compared with other group screening designs. It is shown under certain conditions, that incomplete block screening designs can provide nearly a 90% cost saving compared to other group screening designs such as when prevalence is 0.001 and screening 3876 specimens with an ICB-sequential design vs. a Dorfman design. In other cases, previous group screening designs are shown to be most efficient. Overall, when prevalence is small (≤0.05) group screening designs are shown to be quite cost effective at screening a large number of specimens and in general there is no one design that is best in all situations. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol Progress, 35: e2770, 2019.     

Sequentially Generated Designs

Procedures for sequential generation of nearly D-optimal designs are described. Two kinds of designs can be obtained: symmetrical block designs and nonsymmetrical ones. It is shown that in a special case when the number of the support points of a continuous D-optimal design equals to the number of regression coefficients the sequential designs can be constructed very easy without use of a computer. A Catalogue containing 135 designs has been developed by use of these procedures. 34 of them can be used for experiments in cuboidal factor space and the remaining for experiments with mixture and process variables. Comparison with other designs is done.     

Study duration for clinical trials with survival response and early stopping rule

A comparative clinical trial with built-in sequential stopping rules allows earlier-than-scheduled stopping, should there be a significant indication of treatment difference. In a clinical trial where the major outcome is time (survival time or response) to a certain event such as failure, the design of the study should determine how long one needs to accrue patients and follow through until there is a sufficient number of events observed during the entire study duration. This paper proposes a unified design procedure for group sequential clinical trials with survival response. The time to event is assumed to be exponentially distributed, but the arguments extend naturally to the proportional hazards model after suitable transformation on the time scale. An example from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) is given to illustrate how this procedure can be implemented. The same example is used to explore the overall operating characteristics and the robustness of the proposed group sequential design.     

Design and Analysis of Crossover Trials for Absorbing Binary Endpoints

Summary The crossover is a popular and efficient trial design used in the context of patient heterogeneity to assess the effect of treatments that act relatively quickly and whose benefit disappears with discontinuation. Each patient can serve as her own control as within‐individual treatment and placebo responses are compared. Conventional wisdom is that these designs are not appropriate for absorbing binary endpoints, such as death or HIV infection. We explore the use of crossover designs in the context of these absorbing binary endpoints and show that they can be more efficient than the standard parallel group design when there is heterogeneity in individuals' risks. We also introduce a new two‐period design where first period “survivors” are rerandomized for the second period. This design combines the crossover design with the parallel design and achieves some of the efficiency advantages of the crossover design while ensuring that the second period groups are comparable by randomization. We discuss the validity of the new designs and evaluate both a mixture model and a modified Mantel–Haenszel test for inference. The mixture model assumes no carryover or period effects while the Mantel–Haenszel approach conditions out period effects. Simulations are used to compare the different designs and an example is provided to explore practical issues in implementation.     

Stopping rules for clinical trials incorporating clinical opinion

A method is described of eliciting a 'range of equivalence', i.e. a range of differences between two treatments over which a group of clinical trial participants would have no clear preference for either treatment. This range of equivalence is then incorporated into a formal stopping rule for the trial using an extension of the group sequential design. Tables for the implementation of the design are presented. The method is discussed in the context of other sequential-trial designs.     

Centronuclear (myotubular) myopathy

In recent years, the use of adaptive design methods in clinical research and development based on accrued data has become very popular due to its flexibility and efficiency. Based on adaptations applied, adaptive designs can be classified into three categories: prospective, concurrent (ad hoc), and retrospective adaptive designs. An adaptive design allows modifications made to trial and/or statistical procedures of ongoing clinical trials. However, it is a concern that the actual patient population after the adaptations could deviate from the originally target patient population and consequently the overall type I error (to erroneously claim efficacy for an infective drug) rate may not be controlled. In addition, major adaptations of trial and/or statistical procedures of on-going trials may result in a totally different trial that is unable to address the scientific/medical questions the trial intends to answer. In this article, several commonly considered adaptive designs in clinical trials are reviewed. Impacts of ad hoc adaptations (protocol amendments), challenges in by design (prospective) adaptations, and obstacles of retrospective adaptations are described. Strategies for the use of adaptive design in clinical development of rare diseases are discussed. Some examples concerning the development of Velcade intended for multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma are given. Practical issues that are commonly encountered when implementing adaptive design methods in clinical trials are also discussed.     

Conditional Markov Chain Design for Accrual Clinical Trials

Randomization in a comparative experiment has, as one aim, the control of bias in the initial selection of experimental units. When the experiment is a clinical trial employing the accrual of patients, two additional aims are the control of admission bias and control of chronologic bias. This can be accomplished by using a method of randomization, such as the “biased coin design” of Efron, which sequentially forces balance. As an extension of Efron's design, this paper develops a class of conditional Markov chain designs. The detailed randomization employed utilizes the sequential imbalances in the treatment allocation as states in a Markov process. Through the use of appropriate transition probabilities, a range of possible designs can be attained. An additional objective of physical randomization is to provide a model for data analysis. Such a randomization theoretic analysis is presented for the current designs. In addition, Monte Carlo sampling results are given to support the proposed normal theory approximation to the exact randomization distribution.     

Bayesian Adaptive Randomization and Trial Monitoring with Predictive Probability for Time-to-Event Endpoint

There has been much development in Bayesian adaptive designs in clinical trials. In the Bayesian paradigm, the posterior predictive distribution characterizes the future possible outcomes given the currently observed data. Based on the interim time-to-event data, we develop a new phase II trial design by combining the strength of both Bayesian adaptive randomization and the predictive probability. By comparing the mean survival times between patients assigned to two treatment arms, more patients are assigned to the better treatment on the basis of adaptive randomization. We continuously monitor the trial using the predictive probability for early termination in the case of superiority or futility. We conduct extensive simulation studies to examine the operating characteristics of four designs: the proposed predictive probability adaptive randomization design, the predictive probability equal randomization design, the posterior probability adaptive randomization design, and the group sequential design. Adaptive randomization designs using predictive probability and posterior probability yield a longer overall median survival time than the group sequential design, but at the cost of a slightly larger sample size. The average sample size using the predictive probability method is generally smaller than that of the posterior probability design.     

UNIFICATION OF METHODS FOR ESTIMATING THE STRENGTH OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION

Understanding the evolution of reproductive isolation is tantamount to describing the origin of species. Therefore, a primary goal in evolutionary biology is to identify which reproductive barriers are most important to the process. To achieve this goal, the strength of multiple forms of isolation must be compared in an equivalent manner. However, a diversity of methods has been used to estimate barrier strength, falling into several mathematically distinct categories. This study provides a unified method for calculating isolation that relates the amount of gene flow experienced by taxa to random expectations in a simple linear framework. This approach has three distinct advantages over previous methods: (1) it is directly related to gene flow, (2) it is symmetrical, such that measures in both the positive and negative range are comparable, and (3) it is equivalent between broad categories of reproductive isolation, allowing for appropriate comparisons. This linear formulation can be adjusted for use in all forms of isolation, and can accommodate cases in which null expectations for con‐ and heterospecific gene flow differ. Additionally, this framework can be used to calculate total reproductive isolation and the relative contributions of individual barriers.     

Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power

Ethical considerations and the competitive environment of clinical trials usually require that any given trial have sufficient power to detect a treatment advance. If at an interim analysis the available data are used to decide whether the trial is promising enough to be continued, investigators and sponsors often wish to have a high conditional power, which is the probability to reject the null hypothesis given the interim data and the alternative of interest. Under this requirement a design with interim sample size recalculation, which keeps the overall and conditional power at a prespecified value and preserves the overall type I error rate, is a reasonable alternative to a classical group sequential design, in which the conditional power is often too small. In this article two-stage designs with control of overall and conditional power are constructed that minimize the expected sample size, either for a simple point alternative or for a random mixture of alternatives given by a prior density for the efficacy parameter. The presented optimality result applies to trials with and without an interim hypothesis test; in addition, one can account for constraints such as a minimal sample size for the second stage. The optimal designs will be illustrated with an example, and will be compared to the frequently considered method of using the conditional type I error level of a group sequential design.     

A new procedure for group sequential analysis in clinical trials.

Since Pocock (1977, Biometrika 64, 191-199), many methods have been developed for group sequential analysis of clinical trials. However, these methods remain underemployed partly because of inconsistencies of sequential testing [Berry (1987, The Statistician 36, 181-189)]. This paper considers a new approach, which, by requiring that a succession of interim analyses be significant at the alpha level, both preserves the overall significance level alpha and does not present some of the inconsistencies of the previous methods. Results are obtained for a normal or binary response and for survival data. A comparison with the usual group sequential testing is also presented.