Structure, spectra and electrochemistry of ruthenium-carbonyl complexes of naphthylazoimidazole

[Ru(H)(CO)(PPh₃)₂(α/β-NaiR)](ClO₄) (3, 4) are synthesized by the reaction of [Ru(H)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with 1-alkyl-2-(naphthyl-α/β-azo)imidazole (α-NaiR (3); β-NaiR (4)). One of the complexes [Ru(H)(CO)(PPh₃)₂(α-NaiMe)](ClO₄) (3a) has been structurally established by X-ray diffraction study. Upon addition of Cl₂ saturated in MeCN to 3 or 4 gives [Ru(Cl)(CO)(α/β-NaiR)(PPh₃)₂](ClO₄) (for α-NaiR (5); β-NaiR (6)), without affecting metal oxidation state, which were characterized by spectroscopic measurements. The redox property of the complexes is examined by cyclic voltammetry.     

Coordination of 4-mercapto-1,2-dithiole-3-thione heterocycles to ruthenium(II) and molybdenum(VI) centres

Deprotonation of 4-mercapto-1,2-dithiole-3-thiones with NEt₃ followed by reaction with [Ru(H)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₃] affords virtually quantitative yields of turquoise [Ru(H)(RC₃S₄)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (R = Ph, Mes) in which the heterocycle is bound as a bidentate uninegative ligand through the two exocyclic sulfur atoms. The presence of both possible isomers in each case is indicated by NMR spectroscopy. Reaction of the 4-mercapto-1,2-dithiole-3-thiones with [MoO₂(acac)₂] results in displacement of the acac ligands and formation of [MoO₂(RC₃S₄)₂]. The crystal structures of [Ru(H)(MesC₃S₄)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] and [MoO₂(MesC₃S₄)₂] have been determined.     

Reaction of iron and ruthenium halogenide complexes with GaCp and AlCp: Insertion, Cp transfer reactions and orthometallation

The reactions of the Fe(II) and Ru(II) halogenide complexes [Fe(PPh₃)₂Br₂], [Fe(NCCH₃)₂Br₂], [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂], and [Ru(dmso)₄Cl₂] with GaCp^∗ and AlCp^∗, respectively, are investigated. The reactions of [FeBr₂L₂] with ECp^∗ exclusively proceed via Cp^∗ transfer, leading to [FeCp^∗(GaCp^∗)(GaBr₂)(PPh₃)] (1) (L = PPh₃, E = Ga), [FeCp^∗(GaCp^∗)₂ (GaBr₂)] (2) (L = NCCH₃, E = Ga) and [FeCp^∗(μ³-H)(κ²-(C₆H₄)PPh₂)(AlCp^∗)(AlBr₂)] (3) (L = PPh₃, E = Al), the latter of which is formed via orthometallation of one PPh₃ ligand. The reaction of [Ru(dmso)₄Cl₂] leads to the homoleptic complex [Ru(GaCp^∗)₆Cl₂] (4) in high yields, while [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] gives 4 in rather low yields. The reason for this difference in reactivity is investigated and it is shown that Cp^∗ transfer and orthometallation are the limiting side reactions of the reaction of [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with GaCp^∗. All compounds were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, and single crystal X-ray diffraction studies were performed for 1, 3, and 4.     

Ruthenium(II/III) mediated transformation of 1,2-bis(2′-pyridylmethyleneimino)benzene (L) to 2-(2′-benzimidazolyl)pyridine (L′H) and its in situ formed complexes with Ru(II): X-ray structure of trans-[Ru(PPh3)2(L′H)2](ClO4)2

A series of ruthenium (II) complexes of formulae trans-[Ru(PPh₃)₂(L′H)₂](ClO₄)₂ (1), [Ru(bpy)(L′H)₂](ClO₄)₂ (2), [Ru(bpy)₂(L′H)](ClO₄)₂ (3), cis-[Ru(DMSO)₂(L′H)₂]Cl₂ (4), and [Ru(L′H)₃](PF₆)₂ (5) (where L′H = 2-(2′-benzimidazolyl)pyridine) have been synthesized by reaction of the appropriate ruthenium precursor with 1,2-bis(2′-pyridylmethyleneimino)benzene (L). The complexes were characterized by elemental analyses, spectroscopic and electrochemical data. All the complexes were found to be diamagnetic and hence metal is in +2 oxidation state. The molecular structure of trans-[Ru(PPh₃)₂(L′H)₂](ClO₄)₂ has been determined by the single crystal X-ray diffraction studies. The molecular structure shows that Ru(II) is at the center of inversion of an octahedron with N₄P₂ coordination sphere. The ligand acts as a bidentate N,N′donor. The electronic spectra of the complexes display intense MLCT bands in the visible region.Cyclic voltammetric studies show quasi-reversible oxidative response at 0.99-1.32 V (vs Ag/AgCl reference electrode) due to Ru(III)/Ru(II) couple.     

Transition metal complexes with sulfur ligands. XIX. Mono- and bis-alkylation of [Ru(II)L1L2dttd] complexes controlled by the ligands L as well as the charge of the resulting compounds (dttd2−=2,3:8,9-dibenzo-1,4,7,10-tetrathiadecane(−2), L1L2PPh3; L1L2PMe3; L1PPh3, L2PMe3)

The alkylation of the thiolato-S atoms of the dttd- ligand in [RuL₁L₂dttd] complexes was investigated (L₁L₂PPh₃; L₁L₂PMe₃; L₁PPh₃, L₂PMe₃; dttd²⁻=2,3:8,9-dibenzo-1,4,7,10-tetrathiadecane(−2)). The substitution lability of the phosphine ligands L₁ and L₂ determines whether one or both of the thiolato-S atoms are alkylated when [RuL₁L₂dttd] is reacted with alkylhalides. [Ru(PPh₃)₂dttd], in which one PPh₃ is substitution labile, is doubly alkylated on reaction with CH₃I yielding [Ru(PPh₃)I(Me₂-dttd)]I (Me₂-dttd=1,10-dimethyl-2,3:8,9-dibenzo-1,4,7,10-tetrathiadecane). Reaction of the substitution inert phosphine complexes [Ru(PMe₃)₂dttd] and [Ru(PPh₃)(PMe₃)dttd] with CH₃I yields the monoalkylated derivatives [Ru(PMe₃)₂(Me-dttd)]I and [Ru(PPh₃)(PMe₃)(Me- dttd)]I, respectively. Analogously, ethyl as well as bromine derivatives can be obtained. The cation in [Ru(PPh₃)X(Me₂-dttd)]X (XI, Br) proves to be substitution inert under ordinary conditions; the anion X can be exchanged for other singly charged anions via [Ru(PPh₃)X(Me₂dttd)]₂SO₄. In concentrated H₂SO₄, [Ru(PPh₃)Br(Me₂-dttd)]Br could be reacted to give [Ru(Br₂)(Me₂dttd)]. All compounds were characterized spectroscopically as well as by elemental analyses. The structure of [Ru(PPh₃)I(Me₂- dttd)]I was determined by X-ray structure analysis.[Ru(PPh₃)I(Me₂-dttd)]I (1) crystallizes from CH₂Cl₂ as 1·3CH₂Cl₂ in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with the following unit cell dimensions: a= 20.103(0.03), b=11.148(0.009), c=26.985(0.03) Å; β=130.71(0.07)°, V=4584(3) ų and Z=4. The structure refinement stopped at R₁=8.86 and R₂= 10.44% because of disorder of the CH₂Cl₂ solvate molecules. In the cation of 1 Ru is coordinated pseudo-octahedrally by I-, P- and four thioether-S atoms.     

Tris(pentachlorophenyl) gold(III) complexes

By reaction of Tl(C₆Cl₅)₂Cl with Au(C₆Cl₅)(tht) (tht = tetrahydrothiophen) or [N(PPh₃)₂] [Au(C₆- Cl₅)Cl] the gold(III) complexes [Au(C₆Cl₅)₃(tht)] or [N(PPh₃)₂][Au(C₆Cl₅)₃Cl] respectively, can be prepared. They are the first tris(pentachlorophenyl)- gold(III) complexes to be reported. The ready displacement of tht by other neutral or anionic ligands leads to the synthesis of Au(C₆Cl₅)₃(Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) or Q[Au(C₆Cl₅)₃X] (Q=N(PPh₃)₂, PPh₃Me or PPh₂Me₂; X=C₆F₅, SCN, Br or I).     

Synthesis, characterization and reactivity of polypyridyl ruthenium(II) carbonyl complexes with phosphine derivatives: Ruthenium-carbon bond labilization based on steric and electronic effects

Ruthenium phosphine complexes with a CO ligand [Ru(tpy)(PR₃)(CO)Cl]⁺ (tpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine, R = Ph or p-tolyl), were prepared by introduction of CO gas to the corresponding dichloro complexes at room temperature. New carbonyl complexes were characterized by various methods including structural analyses. They were shown to release CO following the addition of several N-donors to form the corresponding substituted complexes. The kinetic data and structural results observed in this study indicated that the CO release reactions proceeded in an interchange mechanism. The molecular structures of [Ru(tpy)(PPh₃)(CO)Cl]PF₆, [Ru(tpy)(P(p-tolyl)₃)(CO)Cl]PF₆ and [Ru(tpy)(PPh₃)(CH₃CN)Cl]PF₆ were determined by X-ray crystallography.     

The Synthesis,Characterization and Reactivity of a Series of Ruthenium N-triphosPh Complexes

Herein we report the synthesis of a tridentate phosphine ligand N(CH₂PPh₂)₃ (N-triphos^Ph) (1) via a phosphorus based Mannich reaction of the hydroxylmethylene phosphine precursor with ammonia in methanol under a nitrogen atmosphere. The N-triphos^Ph ligand precipitates from the solution after approximately 1 hr of reflux and can be isolated analytically pure via simple cannula filtration procedure under nitrogen. Reaction of the N-triphos^Ph ligand with [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] under reflux affords a deep red solution that show evolution of CO gas on ligand complexation. Orange crystals of the complex [Ru(CO)₂{N(CH₂PPh₂)₃}-κ³P] (2) were isolated on cooling to RT. The ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectrum showed a characteristic single peak at lower frequency compared to the free ligand. Reaction of a toluene solution of complex 2 with oxygen resulted in the instantaneous precipitation of the carbonate complex [Ru(CO₃)(CO){N(CH₂PPh₂)₃}-κ³P] (3) as an air stable orange solid. Subsequent hydrogenation of 3 under 15 bar of hydrogen in a high-pressure reactor gave the dihydride complex [RuH₂(CO){N(CH₂PPh₂)₃}-κ³P] (4), which was fully characterized by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. Complexes 3 and 4 are potentially useful catalyst precursors for a range of hydrogenation reactions, including biomass-derived products such as levulinic acid (LA). Complex 4 was found to cleanly react with LA in the presence of the proton source additive NH₄PF₆ to give [Ru(CO){N(CH₂PPh₂)₃}-κ³P{CH₃CO(CH₂)₂CO₂H}-κ²O](PF₆) (6).     

Interactions of bis-[μ-chloro-chlorotricarbonylruthenium(II)] and poly-[μ-dichloro-dicarbonylruthenium(II)] with nucleosides

The interactions of dimeric complex bis-[μ-chloro-chlorotricarbonylruthenium(II)], [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂, and the polymeric complex poly-[μ-dichlorodicarbonylruthenium(II)], [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂]_x, with nucleosides (Nucl) in a 1:1 Ru:Nucl molar ratio for the dimer and 1:2 Ru:Nucl for the polymer, resulted in formation of the monomeric mononucleoside [Ru(CO)₃(Nucl)Cl₂] and bis-nucleoside [Ru(CO)₂(Nucl)₂Cl₂] complexes, respectively. The dimer [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂ also gave the ionic bis-nucleoside complexes [Ru(CO)₃(Nucl)₂Cl]Cl in the molar ratio 1:2 Ru:Nucl. The mononucleoside complexes are stable in solution while the bis-nucleoside complexes tend to lose one nucleoside in strong complexing solvents, probably by solvent substitution. The complexes [Ru(CO)₃(Nucl)Cl₂] and [Ru(CO)₂(Nucl)₂Cl₂] with one N(1)H ionizable imino proton undergo ionization in alkaline solution and the complexes [Ru(CO)₃(NuclH⁺)Cl] and [Ru(CO)₂(NuclH⁺)₂], respectively, were isolated. In these deprotonated complexes the nucleosides behave as bidentate ligands, while in the protonated ones they act as monodentate. All Complexes were characterized by elemental analyses and various spectroscopic methods.     

Ruthenium hydride and vinyl complexes supported by nitrogen-oxygen mixed-donor ligands

The Schiff base, 2-chlorophenylsalicylaldimine (HL₁), is formed readily from salicylaldehyde and 2-chloroaniline. After deprotonation, this ligand is found to react as a bidentate mixed-donor chelate with the complexes [RuRCl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] (R = H, CHCHC₆H₅, CHCHC₆H₄Me-4, CHCH^tBu, CCCPhCHPh; BTD = 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole) to form the compounds [RuR(L₁)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] through displacement of the chloride and BTD ligands. An analogous reaction occurs with the osmium complex [OsHCl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] to provide [OsH(L₁)(CO)(PPh₃)₂]. The compound [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)(L₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] is formed through reaction of salicylaldehyde (HL₂) with [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)Cl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] in the presence of base. Two further ligands were investigated to extend the study to encompass 5- and 4-membered chelates; 8-hydroxyquinoline (HL₃) and 2-hydroxy-4-methylquinoline (HL₄) react with [Ru(CHCHPh)Cl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] and [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)Cl(CO)(BTD)(PPh₃)₂] in the presence of base to yield the complexes [Ru(CHCHPh)(L₃)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] and [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)(L₄)(CO)(PPh₃)₂], respectively. The crystal structure of [Ru(CHCHC₆H₄Me-4)(L₁)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] is reported.     

Transition metal complexes with sulfur ligands. XXVIII. Ruthenium complexes of the pentadentate thioether thiolate ligands dpttd (2,3,11,12-dibenzo-1,4,7,10,13-pentathiatridecane(−2)) and the sterically demanding derivative bu4-dpttd (14,16,18,20-tetra (t-butyl)-2,3,11,12-dibenzo-1,4,7,10,13-pentathiatridecane(−2))

The template alkylation of Li₂[Ru(CO)₂(S₂C₆H₄)₂] (S₂C₆H₄²⁻ = 1,2-benzenedithiolate(−2)) by S(C₂H₄Br)₂ yields [Ru(CO)₂(dpttd)] (dpttd²⁻ = 3,11,12-dibenzo-1,4,7,10,13-pentathiatridecane(−2)) which is thermally converted into the monocarbonyl complex [Ru(CO)(dpttd)]. The reactions of dpttd-H₂ or dpttd²⁻ with [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃], [RuCl₂(DMSO)₄], [RuCl₃(PhSCH₃)₃] and RuCl₃(NO)·xH₂O lead to [Ru(L)(dpttd)] and [Ru(L)(dpttd)]Cl (L = PPh₃, DMSO, PhSCH₃, NO), respectively, which are practically insoluble in all common solvents. Better soluble complexes are obtained with the new sterically demanding ligand ^tbu₄-dpttd²⁻ = 14,16,18,20-tetra(t-butyl)-2,3,11,12-dibenzo-1,4,7, 10,13-pentathiatridecane(−2); it is obtained in isomerically pure form by the reaction of tetrabuthylammonium-3,5-di (t-butyl)-1,2-benzenethiolthiolate, NBu₄[^tbu₂-C₆H₂S(SH), with S(C₂H₄Br)₂ and yields on reaction with [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] the very soluble [Ru(PPh₃)₂(^tbu₄-dpttd)] as well as [Ru(PPh₃(^tbu₄-dpttd)]. The ¹H NMR and ³¹P NMR spectra indicate that in solution [Ru(PPh₃)₂(^tbu₄-dpttd)] exists as a mixture of diastereomers, whereas [Ru(PPh₃)(^tbu₄-dpttd)] forms one pair of enantiomers only. This was confirmed by an X-ray structure determination of a single crystal. [Ru(PPh₃)(^tbu₄-dpttd)] crystallizes in space group P2₁/n with a = 10.496(4), b = 14.888(6), c = 32.382(12) Å, β = 98.04(3)°, Z = 4 and D_calc. = 1.27 g/cm³, R = 4.84; R_W = 5.06%; the ruthenium center is coordinated pseudooctahedrally by one phosphorus, two thiolate and three thiother S atoms.     

Reactions of the Tridentate and Tetradentate Amine Ligands di-(2-picolyl)(N-ethyl)amine and 2,5-Bis-(2-pyridylmethyl)-2,5 diazohexane with Technetium Nitrosyl Complexes

The reaction of the Tc(II) nitrosyl complex (Bu₄N)[Tc(NO)Cl₄] with di-(2-picolyl)(NEt)amine in methanol yields the neutral complex [Tc(NO)Cl(py-N(Et)-py)]. The reaction of the Tc(I) nitrosyl complex [Tc(NO)Cl₂(HOMe)(PPh₃)₂] with this tridentate ligand yields cationic [Tc(NO)Cl(py-N(Et)-py)(PPh₃)]Cl. These two complexes have been structurally characterized. The reaction of [Tc(NO)Cl₂(HOMe)(PPh₃)₂] with the tetradentate ligand 1,4-bis-(2-pyridylmethyl)-1,4-diazobutane yields a mixture of products including cationic [Tc(NO)Cl(py-NH-NH-py)]Cl and cationic [Tc(NO)Cl(PPh₃)(py-NH-NH∼py)]Cl, with a pyridyl terminus left dangling.     

p-Quinquephenyl diamine, C6H5-p-C6H4-p-C6H2(2,3-NH2)-p-C6H4-C6H5, and its corresponding diimine-Ru(II) complex: Crystal structure and electrochemical and optical properties

The molecular structure of an o-phenylenediamine unit-containing oligophenylene (1), Ph-Ph′-Ph′(2,3-NH₂)-Ph′-Ph (Ph = phenyl; Ph′ = p-phenylene; Ph′(2,3-NH₂) = 2,3-diamino-p-phenylene), was determined by X-ray crystallography. 1 has a twisted structure, and forms an intermolecular C-H?π interaction network. The -NH₂ group of 1 was air-oxidized to an imine, NH, group in the presence of [RuCl₂(bpy)₂] (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridyl) and gave a ruthenium(II)-benzoquinone diimine complex [Ru(2)(bpy)₂](PF₆)₂ (2: Ph-Ph′-Ph′(2,3-imine)-Ph′-Ph). The molecular structure of [Ru(2)(bpy)₂](PF₆)₂ was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. [Ru(2)(bpy)₂](PF₆)₂ underwent two-step electrochemical reduction with E^1/2 = −0.889 V and −1.531 V versus Fc⁺/Fc. The E^1/2’s were located at higher potentials by 91 mV and 117 mV, respectively, than those of reported [Ru(bqdi)(bpy)₂](PF₆)₂ (bqdi = benzoquinone diimine). Electrochemical oxidation of [Ru(2)(bpy)₂](PF₆)₂ occurred at a lower potential by 180 mV than that of [Ru(bqdi)(bpy)₂](PF₆)₂. Occurrence of the easier reduction and oxidation of [Ru(2)(bpy)₂](PF₆)₂ than those of [Ru(bqdi)(bpy)₂](PF₆)₂ is ascribed to the presence of a large π-conjugation system in 2.     

A cyclic osmastannyl complex, Os(κ(Sn,P)-SnMe2C6H4PPh2)(κ-S2CNMe2)(CO)(PPh3) derived from the osmastannol complex, Os(SnMe2OH)(κ-S2CNMe2)(CO)(PPh3)2

Treatment of the six-coordinate trimethylstannyl complex, Os(SnMe₃)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (1) with SnMe₂Cl₂ produces Os(SnMe₂Cl)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (2), which in turn reacts readily with hydroxide ion to give, Os(SnMe₂OH)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (3). The osmastannol complex 3 undergoes a reaction with 2 equivalents of ^tBuLi, in which one of the phenyl rings of a triphenylphosphine ligand is “ortho-stannylated”, without cleavage of the Os-Sn bond, to give the cyclic complex, Os(κ²(Sn,P)-SnMe₂C₆H₄PPh₂)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃) (4). This novel cyclic complex is selectively functionalised at the tin atom by reaction with SnMe₂Cl₂ which exchanges one methyl group for chloride giving the diastereomeric mixture, Os(κ²(Sn,P)-SnMeClC₆H₄PPh₂)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃) (5a/5b). Crystal structure determination reveals that both diastereomers occur in the unit cell. The mixture, 5a/5b, undergoes reaction with hydroxide ion to give the diastereomeric osmastannol complexes, Os(κ²(Sn,P)-SnMeOHC₆H₄PPh₂)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃) (6a/6b) and with sodium borohydride to give the corresponding tin-hydride mixture, Os(κ²(Sn,P)-SnMeHC₆H₄PPh₂)(κ²-S₂CNMe₂)(CO)(PPh₃) (7a/7b). Crystal structure determinations for 2, 4, and 5a/5b have been obtained.     

Dinuclear ruthenium complexes containing tripodal dithiophosphonate ligands

Treatment of [(η⁶-p-cymene)RuCl(μ-Cl)]₂ with Lawesson’s reagent [ArP(S)(μ-S)]₂ (Ar = p-C₆H₄OMe) in the presence of ammonium hydroxide afforded the dinuclear complex [(η⁶-p-cymene)Ru{μ-η¹(S),η²(S,S′)-ArP(O)S₂}]₂ (1) in which the tripodal [ArP(O)S₂]²⁻ ligands bind to the ruthenium atom in both bridging and chelating modes with two non-coordinating PO groups. Interaction of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with [ArP(S)(μ-S)]₂ and bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) in the presence of ammonium hydroxide gave the dinuclear complex [Ru(CO){μ₃-η¹(O),η²(S,S′)-ArP(O)S₂}(dppm)]₂ (2) in which the tripodal [ArPOS₂]²⁻ ligands bind the two Ru atoms via both sulfur and oxygen atoms. Treatment of [Ru(PPh₃)₃Cl₂] with [ArP(S)(μ-S)]₂ at reflux in the presence of ammonium hydroxide led to the formation of the dinuclear mixed valence complex [Ru₂Cl₂(μ-S){μ₃-η¹(O),η¹(S),-η²(S,S′)-ArP(O)S₂}(PPh₃)₃] (3), which contains a [Ru^II(PPh₃)₂Cl]⁺ and [Ru^IV(PPh₃)Cl]³⁺ moieties by the tripodal [ArPOS₂]²⁻ ligand in a μ₃-η¹(O),η¹(S),η²(S,S′) coordination mode and the μ-S²⁻ anion. The crystal structures of 1, 2, and 3·CH₂Cl₂ along with their spectroscopic and electrochemical properties are reported.     

Photochemical synthesis method of tungsten(II) complexes [WCl2(CO)3PPh3)2] and [WCl2(CO)2(dppe)]

The photochemical oxidation reaction of W(CO)₆ to [W(CO)₄Cl₂]₂ with CCl₄ was applied in the synthesis of [WCl₂(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂] and [WCl₂(CO)₂₋- (dppe)].     

Versatile coordination behaviour of Ph2AsCH2AsPh2 with Ru(II)

Treatment of ‘RuCl₃ · 3H₂O’ with Ph₂AsCH₂AsPh₂ (dpam) in hot EtOH gives either trans-[RuCl₂(dpam-As,As′)(dpam-As)₂] (1), or cis-[RuCl₂(dpam-As,As′)₂] (2), depending on the mole ratio. On exposure to light, solutions of 2 isomerise to trans-[RuCl₂(dpam-As,As′)₂] (3). Treatment of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with two equivalents of dpam in CH₂Cl₂ gave a mixture of two products, from which trans-[RuCl₂(PPh₃) (dpam-As,As′)(dpam-As)] (4) was isolated by recrystallisation. The crystal structures of 1-4 are reported. Complexes 1-3 in CH₂Cl₂ undergo electrochemical oxidation to Ru(III), and the Ru(III) form of 2 undergoes isomerisation on the voltammetric timescale to the Ru(III) form of 3.     

Synthesis and characterization of ruthenium and osmium complexes of heterocyclic bidentate ligands (N, X), X = S, Se

The reaction of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] and [OsBr₂(PPh₃)₃] precursors with a series of heterocyclic bidentate (N, X) ligands, X = S, Se, gave complexes [M(R-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂], (R = H, 3-CF₃, 5-CF₃, 3-Me₃Si); [M(R-pymS)₂(PPh₃)₂], (R = 4-CF₃, 4,6-MeCF₃) and [M(R-pySe)₂(PPh₃)₂], (R = H, 3-CF₃, 5-CF₃), where M is Ru or Os, pyS and pymS the anions of pyridine-2-thione and pyrimidine-2-thione, respectively, and pySe is the anion produced by the reductive cleavage of the Se-Se bond in the dipyridyl-2,2′-diselenide. All of the compounds obtained were characterized by microanalysis, IR, FAB, NMR spectroscopy and by cyclic voltammetry. Compounds [Ru(3-CF₃-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂] · 2(CH₂Cl₂) (2), [Ru(3-Me₃Si-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂] (4), [Ru(4-CF₃-pymS)₂(PPh₃)₂] (5), [Ru(3-CF₃-pySe)₂(PPh₃)₂] · 2(CH₂Cl₂) (8), [Os(3-CF₃-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂] · (CHCl₃) (11), [Os(3-Me₃Si-pyS)₂(PPh₃)₂] (13), [Os(3-CF₃-pySe)₂(PPh₃)₂] · 2(CH₂Cl₂) (17), [Os(5-CF₃-pySe)₂(PPh₃)₂] · 2(H₂O) (18) and [OsCl₂(4,6-MeCF₃-pymS)(PPh₃)₂] (19) were also characterized by X-ray diffraction. In all cases, the metal is in a distorted octahedral environment with the heterocyclic ligand acting as a bidentate (N, S) chelate system.     

A bicarbonate bridged diruthenium(I) complex: Key evidence for the decarboxylation step in the base-assisted reduction of Ru2Cl4(CO)6

Base-assisted reduction of [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂ in the presence of NP-Me₂ (2,7-dimethyl-1,8-naphthyridine) in thf provides an unsupported diruthenium(I) complex [Ru₂(CO)₄Cl₂(NP-Me₂)₂] (1). Two NP-Me₂ and four carbonyls bind at equatorial positions and two chlorides occupy sites trans to the Ru-Ru single bond. Reaction of [Ru(CO)₃Cl₂]₂, TlOTf, KOH and NP-Me₂ in acetonitrile, in a sealed container, affords a bicarbonate bridged diruthenium(I) complex [Ru₂(CO)₂(μ-CO)₂(μ-O₂COH)(NP-Me₂)₂](OTf) (2). The in situ generated CO₂ is the source for bicarbonate under basic reaction medium. Isolation of 2 validates the decarboxylation step in the base-assisted reduction of [Ru^II(CO)₃Cl₂]₂ → [Ru^I₂(CO)₄]²⁺.     

Crystal structures of HM(SiPh3)(CO)3(PPh3)(M=Fe,Ru) formed from photolysis of M(CO)4PPh3 in the presence of HSiPh3

Near-UV irradiation of M(CO)₄PPh₃ (M=Fe, Ru) at 298 K in deoxygenated hydrocarbon solutions containing molecules having a Si-H bond gives clean formation of products of the formula HM(CO)₃(PPh₃)(Si

). Several isomers of such species are possible and X-ray crystallography has been used to unambiguously establish the isomer formed in the photochemical reaction. The crystal structure of the isomer of HM(SiPh₃)CO)₃(PPh₃) formed by the photochemical reaction of M(CO)₄PPh₃ with HSiPh₃ is reported for M=Fe (1) and Ru (2). Both complexes have the same geometry, a distorted octahedron with the COs meridional and the H cis to both the SiPh₃ and the PPh₃. The crystals are triclinic, space group P$\text{1}$. Crystal parameters for 2, (followed in square brackets by those for 1), are: a=12.535(3) [12.32(2)], b=14.244(3) [14.50(4)], c=10.174(3) [10.06(2)] Å, α=104.98(2) [106.3(2)], β=98.52(2) [98.2(2)], γ=71.92(2)° [72.0(2)°], V=1663.63 [1637.38] ų.