Therapeutic potency of pharmacological adenosine receptors agonist/antagonist on cancer cell apoptosis in tumor microenvironment,current status,and perspectives

The hypoxic niche of tumor leads to a tremendous increase in the extracellular adenosine concentration through alteration of adenosine metabolism in the tumor microenvironment (TME). This consequently affects cancer progression, local immune responses, and apoptosis of tumor cells. Regulatory effect of adenosine on apoptosis in TME depends on the cancer cell type, pharmacological characteristics of adenosine receptor subtypes, and the adenosine concentration in the tumor niche. Exploiting specific pharmacological adenosine receptor agonist and antagonist inducing apoptosis in cancer cells can be considered as a proper procedure to control cancer progression. This review summarizes the regulatory role of adenosine in cancer cell apoptosis for a better understanding, and hence better management of the disease.     

Capacitation state-dependent changes in adenosine receptors and their regulation of adenylyl cyclase/cAMP

This study was designed to localize adenosine receptors and to provide evidence that specific receptors are active only in either uncapacitated or capacitated mouse spermatozoa, where they play a role in regulating cAMP production. Using specific antibodies, stimulatory A(2A) receptors were localized primarily on the acrosomal cap region and the flagellar principal piece. Interestingly, the staining was much more pronounced in uncapacitated than in capacitated spermatozoa, suggesting capacitation-dependent changes in epitope accessibility. A(1) receptors showed a very similar distribution, but the staining was markedly greater in capacitated than in uncapacitated cells. After addition of purified decapacitation factor (DF) to capacitated cells, strong staining for A(2A) was regained, suggesting reversibility in epitope accessibility. Chlortetracycline analysis revealed that an agonist specific for A(2A) receptors had no detectable effect on capacitated cells, but after DF-induced decapacitation, the agonist then stimulated capacitation. That agonist also significantly stimulated cAMP production in uncapacitated cells, had no effect on capacitated cells, but regained the ability to stimulate cAMP in the latter following DF treatment. In contrast, an A(1) agonist inhibited cAMP in capacitated cells. These results indicate that specific adenosine receptors function in a reversible manner in one or other capacitation state, resulting in regulation of cAMP.     

Adenosine A2A receptors control the extracellular levels of adenosine through modulation of nucleoside transporters activity in the rat hippocampus

Adenosine, a neuromodulator of the CNS, activates inhibitory-A1 receptors and facilitatory-A2A receptors; its synaptic levels are controlled by the activity of bi-directional equilibrative nucleoside transporters. To study the relationship between the extracellular formation/inactivation of adenosine and the activation of adenosine receptors, we investigated how A1 and A2A receptor activation modifies adenosine transport in hippocampal synaptosomes. The A2A receptor agonist, CGS 21680 (30 nm), facilitated adenosine uptake through a PKC-dependent mechanism, but A1 receptor activation had no effect. CGS 21680 (30 nm) also increased depolarization-induced release of adenosine. Both effects were prevented by A2A receptor blockade. A2A receptor-mediated enhancement of adenosine transport system is important for formatting adenosine neuromodulation according to the stimulation frequency, as: (1) A1 receptor antagonist, DPCPX (250 nm), facilitated the evoked release of [(3)H]acetylcholine under low-frequency stimulation (2 Hz) from CA3 hippocampal slices, but had no effect under high-frequency stimulation (50 Hz); (2) either nucleoside transporter or A2A receptor blockade revealed the facilitatory effect of DPCPX (250 nm) on [3H]acetylcholine evoked-release triggered by high-frequency stimulation. These results indicate that A2A receptor activation facilitates the activity of nucleoside transporters, which have a preponderant role in modulating the extracellular adenosine levels available to activate A1 receptors.     

Adenosine and lymphocyte regulation

Adenosine is a potent extracellular messenger that is produced in high concentrations under metabolically unfavourable conditions. Tissue hypoxia, consequent to a compromised cellular energy status, is followed by the enhanced breakdown of ATP leading to the release of adenosine. Through the interaction with A₂ and A₃ membrane receptors, adenosine is devoted to the restoration of tissue homeostasis, acting as a retaliatory metabolite. Several aspects of the immune response have to be taken into consideration and even though in general it is very important to dampen inflammation, in some circumstances, such as the case of cancer, it is also necessary to increase the activity of immune cells against pathogens. Therefore, adenosine receptors that are defined as “sensors” of metabolic changes in the local tissue environment may be very important targets for modulation of immune responses and drugs devoted to regulating the adenosinergic system are promising in different clinical situations.     

Regulation of adenosine receptors expression in rat B lymphocytes by insulin

Development of diabetes is associated with altered expression of adenosine receptors (ARs). Some of these alterations might be attributed to changes in insulin concentration. This study was undertaken to investigate the possible insulin effect on ARs level, and to determine the signaling pathway utilized by insulin to regulate the expression of ARs in rat B lymphocytes. Western blot analysis of B lymphocytes protein extracts indicated that all four ARs were present at detectable levels in the cells cultured for 24 h without insulin (≤10^?11 M), although the protein band of A_2A‐AR was barely visible. Inclusion of insulin (10^?8 M) in the culture medium resulted in an increase of A₁‐AR and A_2A‐AR protein levels and a significant decrease of A_2B‐AR protein, whereas the protein level of A₃‐AR remained unchanged. Alterations in the ARs protein content were accompanied by changes in the ARs mRNA levels. Increase of the insulin concentration from 10^?11 to 10^?8 M resulted in 50% decrease of A_2B‐AR mRNA level and two‐, and threefold increase of A₁‐AR and A_2A‐AR mRNA levels, respectively. Pretreatment of B cells with cycloheximide completely blocked the insulin action on A₁‐AR and A_2A‐AR mRNA, but not on A_2B‐AR expression. Detailed pharmacological analysis demonstrated that insulin‐induced A₁‐AR and A_2A‐AR mRNA expression through the Ras/Raf‐1/MEK/ERK pathway. The insulin effect on A_2B‐AR expression was blocked by p38 MAP kinase inhibitor (SB 203580). Concluding, elevated insulin concentration differentially affects the expression of ARs in B lymphocytes in a fashion that might enhance the various immunomodulatory effects of adenosine. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 396–405, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Adenosine A2A receptors and metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors are co-localized and functionally interact in the hippocampus: a possible key mechanism in the modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate effects

Hippocampal metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGlu5Rs) regulate both physiological and pathological responses to glutamate. Because mGlu5R activation enhances NMDA-mediated effects, and given the role played by NMDA receptors in synaptic plasticity and excitotoxicity, modulating mGlu5R may influence both the physiological and the pathological effects elicited by NMDA receptor stimulation. We evaluated whether adenosine A2A receptors (A(2A)Rs) modulated mGlu5R-dependent effects in the hippocampus, as they do in the striatum. Co-application of the A(2A)R agonist CGS 21680 with the mGlu5R agonist (RS)-2-chloro-s-hydroxyphenylglycine(CHPG) synergistically reduced field excitatory postsynaptic potentials in the CA1 area of rat hippocampal slices. Endogenous tone at A(2A)Rs seemed to be required to enable mGlu5R-mediated effects, as the ability of CHPG to potentiate NMDA effects was antagonized by the selective A(2A)R antagonist ZM 241385 in rat hippocampal slices and cultured hippocampal neurons, and abolished in the hippocampus of A(2A)R knockout mice. Evidence for the interaction between A(2A)Rs and mGlu5Rs was further strengthened by demonstrating their co-localization in hippocampal synapses. This is the first evidence showing that hippocampal A(2A)Rs and mGlu5Rs are co-located and act synergistically, and that A(2A)Rs play a permissive role in mGlu5R receptor-mediated potentiation of NMDA effects in the hippocampus.     

2- and 8-alkynyl-9-ethyladenines: Synthesis and biological activity at human and rat adenosine receptors

The synthesis of a series of 9-ethyladenine derivatives bearing alkynyl chains in 2- or 8-position was undertaken, based on the observation that replacement of the sugar moiety in adenosine derivatives with alkyl groups led to adenosine receptor antagonists. All the synthesized compounds were tested for their affinity at human and rat A₁, A_2A, and A₃ adenosine receptors in binding assays; the activity at the human A_2B receptor was determined in adenylyl cyclase experiments. Biological data showed that the 2-alkynyl derivatives possess good affinity and are slightly selective for the human A_2A receptor. The same compounds tested on the rat A₁ and A_2A subtypes showed in general lower affinity for both receptors. On the other hand, the affinity of the 8-alkynyl derivatives at the human A₁, A_2A, and A_2B receptors proved to be lower than that of the corresponding 2-alkynyl derivatives. On the contrary, the affinity of the same compounds for the human A₃ receptor was improved, resulting in A₃ selectivity. As in the case of the 2-alkynyl-substituted compounds, the 8-alkynyl derivatives showed decreased affinity for rat receptors. However, it is worthwhile to note that the 8-phenylethynyl-9-ethyladenine was the most active compound of the two series (K_i in the nanomolar range) at both the human and rat A₃ subtype. Docking experiments of the 2- and 8-phenylethynyl-9-ethyladenines, at a rhodopsin-based homology model, gave a rational explanation of the preference of the human A₃ receptor for the 8-substituted compound.     

Effect of Chronic Manganese Treatment on Adenosine Tissue Levels and Adenosine A2a Receptor Binding in Diverse Regions of Mouse Brain

In the present study the effects of chronic manganese (Mn) treatment on adenosine A_2a receptor binding in mouse brain have been assessed. Male albino mice were divided in two groups: In the Mn-treated group, the animals were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with MnCl₂ (5 mg/kg/day) five days per week during 9 weeks; in the control group, they were injected likewise with a saline solution. A significant decrease of the Kd without alteration of Bmax in the cerebellum and, an increase of the Kd and Bmax in hippocampus of mice treated with Mn were found. Also, an increase of Kd in frontal cortex was observed. The binding parameters in caudate nucleus, olfactory bulb and hypothalamus were not altered by Mn. A significant decrease in the adenosine concentration in caudate nucleus, olfactory bulb and hypothalamus, without significant changes in hippocampus, frontal cortex and cerebellum was also detected. These findings suggest that chronic administration of Mn could affect adenosine receptor function and turnover, depending on the brain region analyzed.     

An antagonistic interaction between A2B adenosine and D2 dopamine receptors modulates the function of rat carotid body chemoreceptor cells

We have previously demonstrated that adenosine controls the release of catecholamines (CA) from carotid body (CB) acting on A2B receptors. Here, we have tested the hypothesis that the control is exerted via an interaction between adenosine A2B and dopamine D2 receptors present in chemoreceptor cells. Experiments were performed in vitro in CB from 3 months rats. The effect of A2B adenosine and D2 dopamine agonists and antagonists applied alone or in combination were studied on basal (20%O2) and hypoxia (10%O2)-evoked release of CA and cAMP content of CB. We have found that adenosine A2 agonists and D2 antagonists dose-dependently increased basal and evoked release CA from the CB while A2 antagonists and D2 agonists had an inhibitory action. The existence of A2B-D2 receptor interaction was established because the inhibitory action of A2 antagonists was abolished by D2 antagonists, and the stimulatory action of A2 agonists was abolished by D2 agonists. Further, A2 agonists increased and D2 agonist decreased cAMP content in the CB; their co-application eliminated the response. The present results provide direct pharmacological evidence that an antagonistic interaction between A2B adenosine and D2 dopamine receptors exist in rat CB and would explain the dopamine-adenosine interactions on ventilation previously observed.     

Modulation of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in C6 glioma cells during hypoxia: involvement of endogenous adenosine

During hypoxia, extracellular adenosine levels are increased to prevent cell damage, playing a neuroprotective role mainly through adenosine A₁ receptors. The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of hypoxia in both adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptors endogenously expressed in C6 glioma cells. Two hours of hypoxia (5% O₂) caused a significant decrease in adenosine A₁ receptors. The same effect was observed at 6 h and 24 h of hypoxia. However, adenosine A_2A receptors were significantly increased at the same times. These effects were not due to hypoxia-induced alterations in cells number or viability. Changes in receptor density were not associated with variations in the rate of gene expression. Furthermore, hypoxia did not alter HIF-1α expression in C6 cells. However, HIF-3α, CREB and CREM were decreased. Adenosine A₁ and A_2A receptor density in normoxic C6 cells treated with adenosine for 2, 6 and 24 h was similar to that observed in cells after oxygen deprivation. When C6 cells were subjected to hypoxia in the presence of adenosine deaminase, the density of receptors was not significantly modulated. Moreover, DPCPX, an A₁ receptor antagonist, blocked the effects of hypoxia on these receptors, while ZM241385, an A_2A receptor antagonist, was unable to prevent these changes. These results suggest that moderate hypoxia modulates adenosine receptors and cAMP response elements in glial cells, through a mechanism in which endogenous adenosine and tonic A₁ receptor activation is involved.     

Adenosine A2A receptors control neuroinflammation and consequent hippocampal neuronal dysfunction

The blockade of adenosine A(2A) receptors (A2AR) affords a robust neuroprotection in different noxious brain conditions. However, the mechanisms underlying this general neuroprotection are unknown. One possible mechanism could be the control of neuroinflammation that is associated with brain damage, especially because A2AR efficiently control peripheral inflammation. Thus, we tested if the intracerebroventricular injection of a selective A2AR antagonist (SCH58261) would attenuate the changes in the hippocampus triggered by intraperitoneal administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that induces neuroinflammation through microglia activation. LPS administration triggers an increase in inflammatory mediators like interleukin-1β that causes biochemical changes (p38 and c-jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylation and caspase 3 activation) contributing to neuronal dysfunction typified by decreased long-term potentiation, a form of synaptic plasticity. Long-term potentiation, measured 30 min after the tetanus, was significantly lower in LPS-treated rats compared with control-treated rats, while SCH58261 attenuated the LPS-induced change. The LPS-induced increases in phosphorylation of c-jun N-terminal kinase and p38 and activation of caspase 3 were also prevented by SCH58261. Significantly, SCH58261 also prevented the LPS-induced recruitment of activated microglial cells and the increase in interleukin-1β concentration in the hippocampus, indicating that A2AR activation is a pivotal step in mediating the neuroinflammation triggered by LPS. These results indicate that A2AR antagonists prevent neuroinflammation and support the hypothesis that this mechanism might contribute for the ability of A2AR antagonists to control different neurodegenerative diseases known to involve neuroinflammation.     

Agonist-induced internalization and recycling of the human A(3) adenosine receptors: role in receptor desensitization and resensitization

A(3) adenosine receptors have been proposed to play an important role in the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia with a regimen-dependent nature of the therapeutic effects probably related to receptor desensitization and down-regulation. Here we studied the agonist-induced internalization of human A(3) adenosine receptors in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells, and then we evaluated the relationship between internalization and signal desensitization and resensitization. Binding of N(6)-(4-amino-3-[(125)I]iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide to membranes from Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transfected with the human A(3) adenosine receptor showed a profile typical of these receptors in other cell lines (K:(D) = 1.3+/-0.08 nM; B(max) = 400+/-28 fmol/mg of proteins). The iodinated agonist, bound at 4 degrees C to whole transfected cells, was internalized by increasing the temperature to 37 degrees C with a rate constant of 0.04+/-0.034 min(-1). Agonist-induced internalization of A(3) adenosine receptors was directly demonstrated by immunogold electron microscopy, which revealed the localization of these receptors in plasma membranes and intracellular vesicles. Moreover, short-term exposure of these cells to the agonist caused rapid desensitization as tested in adenylyl cyclase assays. Subsequent removal of the agonist led to restoration of the receptor function and recycling of the receptors to the cell surface. The rate constant of receptor recycling was 0.02+/-0.0017 min(-1). Blockade of internalization and recycling demonstrated that internalization did not affect signal desensitization, whereas recycling of internalized receptors was implicated in the signal resensitization.     

A simple assay of solubilized adenosine receptors with nitrocellulose membrane filters

A rapid and simple assay of solubilized adenosine receptors with nitrocellulose membrane filters is described. This assay was sensitive and reproducible when applied to adenosine receptors solubilized from rat brainstem membranes with 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate. Appropriate values of dissociation constants for the solubilized adenosine receptors to their tritiated agonists were obtained by the membrane filter technique. This method should be applicable for the assay of a variety of solubilized receptors.     

Adenosine A(2A) receptors are required for normal BDNF levels and BDNF-induced potentiation of synaptic transmission in the mouse hippocampus

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a member of neurotrophin family, enhances synaptic transmission and regulates neuronal proliferation and survival. Both BDNF and its tyrosine kinase receptors (TrkB) are highly expressed in the hippocampus, where an interaction with adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2ARs) has been recently reported. In the present paper, we evaluated the role of A_2ARs in mediating functional effects of BDNF in hippocampus using A_2AR knock-out (KO) mice. In hippocampal slices from WT mice, application of BDNF (10 ng/mL) increased the slope of excitatory post-synaptic field potentials (fEPSPs), an index of synaptic facilitation. This increase of fEPSP slope was abolished by the selective A_2A antagonist ZM 241385. Similarly, genetic deletion of the A_2ARs abolished BDNF-induced increase of the fEPSP slope in slices from A_2AR KO mice The reduced functional ability of BDNF in A_2AR KO mice was correlated with the reduction in hippocampal BDNF levels. In agreement, the pharmacological blockade of A₂Rs by systemic ZM 241385 significantly reduced BDNF levels in the hippocampus of normal mice. These results indicate that the tonic activation of A_2ARs is required for BDNF-induced potentiation of synaptic transmission and for sustaining a normal BDNF tone in the hippocampus.     

Solubilization of an Adenosine Uptake Site in Brain

Procedures are described for the solubilization of adenosine uptake sites in guinea pig and rat brain tissue. Using [3H]nitrobenzylthioinosine [( 3H]NBI) the solubilized site is characterized both kinetically and pharmacologically. The binding is dependent on protein concentration and is saturable, reversible, specific, and high affinity in nature. The KD and Bmax of guinea pig extracts are 0.13 +/- 0.02 nM and 133 +/- 18 fmol/mg protein, respectively, with linear Scatchard plots obtained routinely. Similar kinetic parameters are observed in rat brain. Adenosine uptake inhibitors are the most potent inhibitors of [3H]NBI binding with the following order of potency, dilazep greater than hexobendine greater than dipyridamole. Adenosine receptor ligands are much less potent inhibitors of binding, and caffeine is without effect. The solubilized adenosine uptake site is, therefore, shown to have virtually identical properties to the native membrane site. The binding of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist [3H]cyclohexyladenosine [( 3H]CHA) to the solubilized brain extract was also studied and compared with that of [3H]NBI. In contrast to the [3H]NBI binding site [3H]CHA binds to two apparent populations of adenosine receptor, a high-affinity site with a KD of 0.32 +/- 0.06 nM and a Bmax of 105 +/- 30 fmol/mg protein and a lower-affinity site with a KD of 5.50 +/- 0.52 nM and Bmax of 300 +/- 55 fmol/mg protein. The pharmacology of the [3H]CHA binding site is consistent with that of the adenosine receptor and quite distinct from that of the uptake [( 3H]NBI binding) site. Therefore, we show that the adenosine uptake site can be solubilized and that it retains both its binding and pharmacologic properties in the solubilized state.