Participation of California Physicians in Emergency Medical Care Panels, Report of Bureau of Research and Planning

Over 40 per cent of all California physicians belonged to some type of emergency medical care panel during 1961. Of these physicians, almost 60 per cent were affiliated with hospital panels and 27 per cent with County Society panels. Other findings indicate the following facts about physician participation in emergency care panels:...84 per cent of physicians who participate do so on a voluntary basis, with 16 per cent belonging to panels on a compulsory basis....higher than average per cents of physicians belong to such panels in rural areas....compulsory membership is more prevalent in hospital panels than in County Society panels.     

Voluntary Health Insurance Coverage in California, 1961: A Report of the Bureau of Research and Planning, California Medical Association

Almost 7 out of every 10 of the estimated population of 16.2 million persons in California, were covered under some form of voluntary health insurance at the end of 1961. The forms of protection included hospital, surgical, regular medical and major medical expense benefits. The per cent of the civilian population of California covered for surgical benefits was slightly over 66 per cent, while 56 per cent were covered for regular medical expense benefits. Comparable percentages for the United States are approximately 74 per cent (hospital), 69 per cent (surgical), and 51 per cent (regular medical). While the percentage of the State's population covered for hospital and surgical expenses is below that for the United States, it is higher for regular medical expense benefits. The rate of increase in coverage for the different forms of health care protection in California exceeded the rate of population growth during the one-year period ending 1961. The foregoing summary and the information in the accompanying text, does not reflect the total number of persons in California who receive or are eligible for health care services. A large variety of government financed programs on local, state and federal levels either finance or provide such services to an estimated 40 to 50 per cent of the California population, which does not have voluntary health insurance coverage. No current data are available regarding the number of persons who do not desire voluntary health insurance coverage for a variety of personal or financial reasons.     

Type of Practice of Physicians in California,Report of the Bureau of Research and Planning

The total number of non-federal^* physicians in California rose from 23,065 in mid-1959 to 26,271 in January, 1962, an 11.3 per cent increase. The proportion of physicians in private active practice remained almost constant during this period.A significant rise, both in number and proportionally, took place in the full-time specialty category, offset by losses in the general practice-part-time specialty group. While specialists increased by over 30 per cent, general practitioners, who made up 31.7 per cent of all non-federal physicians in 1959, were only 24.7 per cent of the total in early 1962.     

Environment Under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: A Report of the Bureau of Research and Planning, California Medical Association

Active and retired federal employees, together with their dependents, represent the single largest group of persons enrolled in any voluntary health insurance program in the United States. The extent of their coverage and enrollment is of particular interest to physicians in California since this state has the largest proportion of all federal employees enrolled among all states. Of the almost 5(3/4) million federal employees and their dependents, enrollment in California was almost 609,000 or slightly over 10 per cent of all those covered. Better than 3 out of 5 individuals covered were enrolled in service type plans both in the U.S. and in California. Of all persons enrolled in comprehensive group practice and individual practice plans in the U.S., almost one-half were in California alone. Almost 4 out of 5 individuals enrolled were in high option plans. "... an indication that most employees were satisfied with their initial choice of plans."     

Medical practice guidelines: lessons from the United States.

Clinical guidelines, or protocols, have been devised by many different groups, often with differing aims. Some aim to reduce variations in care by using guidelines, while others seek to improve outcomes. Guidelines have long been used in the United States to try to control the behaviour of the medical profession--and the cost of health care. The "effectiveness initiative," run by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research spawned much activity among other groups, including the American Medical Association and the American College of Physicians. The experience of the Americans in analysing data to gauge effectiveness and then in disseminating good practice may help British moves in this direction. In particular, it is often hard to get guidelines adopted in practice; doctors have to be exposed to the same message in different forms. Also guidelines must not be unrealistic: those devised by senior doctors away from the realities of day to day practice are likely to fail.     

United States Private-Sector Physicians and Pharmaceutical Contract Research: A Qualitative Study

Background

There have been dramatic increases over the past 20 years in the number of nonacademic, private-sector physicians who serve as principal investigators on US clinical trials sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. However, there has been little research on the implications of these investigators'' role in clinical investigation. Our objective was to study private-sector clinics involved in US pharmaceutical clinical trials to understand the contract research arrangements supporting drug development, and specifically how private-sector physicians engaged in contract research describe their professional identities.

Methods and Findings

We conducted a qualitative study in 2003–2004 combining observation at 25 private-sector research organizations in the southwestern United States and 63 semi-structured interviews with physicians, research staff, and research participants at those clinics. We used grounded theory to analyze and interpret our data. The 11 private-sector physicians who participated in our study reported becoming principal investigators on industry clinical trials primarily because contract research provides an additional revenue stream. The physicians reported that they saw themselves as trial practitioners and as businesspeople rather than as scientists or researchers.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that in addition to having financial motivation to participate in contract research, these US private-sector physicians have a professional identity aligned with an industry-based approach to research ethics. The generalizability of these findings and whether they have changed in the intervening years should be addressed in future studies. Please see later in the article for the Editors'' Summary.