Evidence that the limb bud ectoderm is required for survival of the underlying mesoderm

The limb forms from a bud of mesoderm encased in a hull of ectoderm that grows out from the flank of the embryo. Coordinated signaling between the limb mesoderm and ectoderm is critical for normal limb outgrowth and patterning. The apical ectodermal ridge (AER), found at the distal tip, is a rich source of signaling molecules and has been proposed to specify distal structures and maintain the survival of cells in the underlying distal mesoderm. The dorsal and ventral non-AER ectoderm is also a source of signaling molecules and is important for dorsal–ventral patterning of the limb bud. Here we determine if this ectoderm provides cell survival signals by surgically removing the dorsal or ventral ectoderm during early chicken limb bud development and assaying for programmed cell death. We find that, similar to the AER, removal of the dorsal or ventral non-AER ectoderm results in massive cell death in the underlying mesoderm. In addition, although a re-epithelialization occurs, we find perturbations in the timing of Shh expression and, for the case of the dorsal ectoderm removal, defects in soft tissue and skeletal development along the proximal–distal axis. Furthermore, ectoderm substitution experiments show that the survival signal produced by the dorsal limb ectoderm is specific. Thus, our results argue that the non-AER ectoderm, like the AER, provides a specific survival signal to the underlying mesoderm that is necessary for normal limb development and conclusions drawn from experiments in which the non-AER ectoderm is removed, need to take into consideration this observation.     

Hyaluronate-cell interactions during differentiation of chick embryo limb mesoderm

The mechanism of interaction of hyaluronate with the surface of cells from embryonic chick limbs was studied using cell cultures of mesoderm from various developmental stages. The mode of interaction of hyaluronate with the cell surface changed at the onset of mesodermal cell condensation prior to differentiation of cartilage and muscle. At this time hyaluronate binding sites appeared on the cells and continued to be present on differentiated chondrocytes but not on myotubes. Direct measurement of hyaluronate binding was made using stage 24 mesodermal cells and membranes isolated from cells derived from various limb stages. The stage 24 cells and membranes from stage 22, 24, and 26 cells exhibited hyaluronate binding, but not membranes from stage 19 mesoderm cultures. At stage 38, membranes from chondrocyte cultures exhibited the highest hyaluronate binding, and membranes from myoblasts and fibroblasts intermediate binding, whereas membranes from myotube-enriched cultures lacked binding activity. No significant competition of hyaluronate binding by chondroitin sulfate was observed. Occupied hyaluronate binding sites were measured by the displacement of radiolabeled cell surface hyaluronate with exogenous, unlabeled hyaluronate. Very little hyaluronate was displaced from mesodermal cells derived from the youngest embryos, namely, stage 19 or stage 20-21. However, greater than 50% of cell surface hyaluronate was displaced from stage 22 and 24 mesodermal cells. The addition of exogenous hyaluronate to stage 26 mesoderm, the stage of onset of cartilage differentiation, and to stage 38 chondrocytes resulted in displacement of large proportions of both hyaluronate and chondroitin sulfate. Addition of exogenous chondroitin sulfate did not cause displacement of significant amounts of cell surface hyaluronate or chondroitin sulfate. These results indicate the presence and developmental modulation of specific binding sites for hyaluronate on limb cells during their differentiation.     

The ectodermal control of mesodermal patterns of differentiation in the developing chick wing

The influence of limb ectoderm on the dorso-ventral muscle and skeletal patterns in the chick wing was studied by recombining stage 14-21 limb mesoderm with the same stage ectoderm in dorso-ventrally reversed orientation. Recombinants grafted to the flank of host embryos were allowed to develop for 10 days. Fully developed wings obtained from stage 15-21 donor embryos have at their distal half d-v polarity conforming to the reversed ectoderm and proximally polarity conforming with the mesoderm. The ectodermal effect is generally observed as a bidorsal feather pattern at the autopod and an almost complete d-v reversal of muscle and skeletal patterns. In experimental wings from donor embryos younger than stage 15, the dorso-ventral pattern conforms with the polarity of the limb mesoderm. The results suggest that control of dorso-ventral polarity resides in the mesoderm until the onset of limb development at stage 15. At this stage, the ectoderm acquires dorso-ventral information which it can impose on the mesoderm.     

Experimental manipulation leading to induction of dorsal ectodermal ridges on normal limb buds results in a phenocopy of the eudiplopodia chick mutant

Elongation of chick limb buds depends on the presence of the apical ectodermal ridge which is induced by subjacent limb bud mesoderm. Recombination experiments have shown that the limb bud mesoderm loses the capacity to induce ridges by late stage 17. Moreover, in normal limb development only one ridge forms. However, in the eudiplopodia chick mutant accessory ectodermal ridges form on the dorsal surface of limb buds as late as stage 22. Tissue recombinant experiments show that the mutation affects the ectoderm, extending the time it responds to ridge induction (Fraser and Abbott, 1971a, Fraser and Abbott, 1971b while the mesoderm is normal. The result is polydactyly, with extra digits dorsal to the normal digits. Because eudiplopodia limb bud dorsal mesoderm can induce ridges at stage 22 but is unaffected by the gene, genetically normal dorsal limb bud mesoderm may also be able to induce ridges after stage 17. To test this possibility we grafted stages 14–18 flank ectoderm to normal limb bud dorsal mesoderm and found that mesoderm from stages 17 through 20 was able to induce a ridge and subsequently dorsal digits developed. Limbs with duplicate digits were similar to eudiplopodia limbs. In other experiments, stage 18, 19, and 20 leg bud dorsal ectoderm did not form ridges when grafted to leg bud dorsal mesoderm of the same stage, indicating a lack of response to the mesoderm. Finally, the inductive capacity of limb bud mesoderm appeared to be reduced compared to mesoderm at pre-limb bud stages. These experiments demonstrate a spatially generalized potential in limb bud dorsal mesoderm to induce ridges during the stages when the apical ridge is induced. The determination of where the ridge will form and the acquired inability of limb bud dorsal ectoderm to respond to induction by underlying mesoderm are necessary early pattern forming events which assure that a single proximodistal limb axis will form.     

Initial limb budding is independent of apical ectodermal ridge activity; evidence from a limbless mutant

Outgrowth of normal chick limb bud mesoderm is dependent on the presence of a specialized epithelium called the apical ectodermal ridge. This ectodermal ridge is induced by the mesoderm at about the time of limb bud formation. The limbless mutation in the chick affects apical ectodermal ridge formation in the limb buds of homozygotes. The initial formation of the limb bud appears to be unaffected by the mutation but no ridge develops and further outgrowth, which is normally dependent on the ridge, does not take place. As a result, limbless chicks develop without limbs. In the present study, which utilized a pre-limb-bud recombinant technique, limbless mesoderm induced an apical ectodermal ridge in grafted normal flank ectoderm. However, at stages when normal flank ectoderm is capable of responding to ridge induction, limbless flank ectoderm did not form a ridge or promote outgrowth of a limb in response to normal presumptive wing bud mesoderm. We conclude from this that the limbless mutation affects the ability of the ectoderm to form a ridge. In addition, because the limbless ectoderm has no morphological ridge and no apparent ridge activity (i.e. it does not stabilize limb elements in stage-18 limb bud mesoderm), the limbless mutant demonstrates that the initial formation of the limb bud is independent of apical ectodermal ridge activity.     

Distribution of retinoids in the chick limb bud: analysis with monoclonal antibody

Retinoic acid induces anteroposterior duplicate formation in developing chick limb bud, and it may be a natural morphogen involved in limb pattern formation. Retinoic acid is produced from retinol locally in the limb bud via retinal, and thus, to elucidate the distribution of these retinoids in the limb bud seems to be important for the understanding of the morphogen formation. We produced a monoclonal antibody against the retinoids with BSA-RA (bovine serum albumin-retinoic acid) conjugate for antigen, and investigated the distribution of retinoids in the chick limb bud. The antibody predominantly bound to retinoic acid, but weakly to retinol and retinal. Retinoids appeared in the limb bud at stage 18 and were distributed through stages 20-24, when the pattern formation in distal mesoderm was in progress. Initially they were found evenly in the whole mesoderm, but disappeared gradually from core mesoderm and remained only in the region of peripheral mesoderm at stage 24. At stage 26, retinoids were detected only in ectoderm. These results support the idea that the retinoids actually play roles in limb pattern formation and suggest that the retinoids in the peripheral mesoderm are important for pattern formation. Further, the role of retinoids in epidermis development at later limb bud stages is also suggested.     

The establishment of the cartilage pattern in the embryonic chick wing, and evidence for a role of the dorsal and ventral ectoderm in normal wing development

Previous investigations have indicated that the limb bud behaves as a mosaic after some experimental manipulations and regulates after others. In light of new maps of the prospective cartilage-forming regions of the chick wing, we have reinvestigated the stability of the limb pattern by two experimental procedures. First, the prospective long bone regions were excised to examine the ability of the cells outside of the prospective long bone regions to form normal long bones. Second, the mesoderm, mesoderm + dorsal and ventral ectoderm, or dorsal ectoderm (with a small amount of subjacent mesoderm) of the prospective elbow region were rotated 180° to examine the ability of the limb to control and regulate the differentiation of the cells in the limb. We can conclude from these experiments that the cartilage-forming regions of the limb mesoderm gradually become stabilized between stage 22 and stage 24, and that the stabilization is due to the advanced state of differentiation and to the decreased rate of cell division after stage 22. In addition, the dorsal and ventral ectoderm have been shown to aid in stabilization of the cartilage pattern and to influence the development of the humerus. We conclude that the dorsal and ventral ectoderm play a significant role in limb development.     

Msx1 expressing mesoderm is important for the apical ectodermal ridge (AER)-signal transfer in chick limb development

The apical ectodermal ridge (AER) is a specialized thickening of the distal limb ectoderm, and its signals are known to support limb morphogenesis. The expression of a homeobox gene, Msx1 , in the distal limb mesoderm depends on signals from the AER. In the present paper it is reported that Msx1 expression in the distal mesoderm is necessary for the transfer of AER signals in chick limb buds. Interruption of AER-mesoderm interaction by insertion of a thick filter led to the inhibition of pattern specification in the mesoderm just under the filter. In such cases, the expression of Msx1 disappeared in the mesoderm under the filter, suggesting that AER is able to signal over short ranges. In advanced limb buds, Msx1 is also expressed in the proximal mesoderm under the anterior ectoderm. However, it was found that a grafted antero-proximal mesoderm shows no inhibitory effects on pattern specification of the host mesoderm, as is the case with the distal mesoderm. On the other hand, grafted mesoderms without potent Msx1 re-expression, even underneath AER, disturbed normal limb development. In such cases, the expression of Msx1 disappeared in the mesoderm under the grafts, whereas Fgf-8 expression was maintained in the AER above the graft. These results indicate that the expression of Msx1 in the mesoderm is important for the transfer of AER signals.     

Inhibitory and stimulatory effects of limb ectoderm on in vitro chondrogenesis

Previous studies have indicated possible dual effects of the limb ectoderm in cartilage differentiation. On one hand, explants from early (stage 15) wing buds are dependent on contact with the limb ectoderm for cartilage differentiation (Gumpel-Pinot, J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 59:157-173, 1980). On the other hand, limb ectoderm from stage 23/24 wing buds inhibits cartilage differentiation by cultured limb mesenchyme cells even without direct contact (Solursh et al., Dev. Biol. 86:471-482, 1981). In the present study, ectoderms from both stage 15/16 and stage 23/24 wings are cultured under the same conditions, and ectoderms from each source are shown to have two effects. Each stimulates chondrogenesis in stage 15 wing bud mesenchyme, and each inhibits chondrogenesis in older wing mesenchyme. The results suggest that the limb ectoderm has at least dual effects on cartilage differentiation, depending on the stage of the mesenchyme. One effect involves an early mesenchymal dependence on the ectoderm. This effect requires contact between the ectoderm and mesoderm (Gumpel-Pinot, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 59:157-173, 1980) but also can be observed at a distance from the ectoderm. Later, the ectoderm can act without direct contact between the ectoderm and mesoderm to inhibit chondrogenesis over some distance.     

Inductive and axial properties of prospective wing-bud mesoderm in the chick embryo

Prospective wing-bud mesoderm, stripped of ectoderm mechanically through the use of glass needles, or chemically by means of EDTA or trypsin, was obtained from donor embryos of stages 11 through 21. Grafts were made in both homopleural (aadd and apdv) and heteropleural (aadv and apdd) combinations to the right flank of host embryos of the same range of stages. Flank ectoderm from the host healed over the graft in a few hours and, in combinations between donors and hosts in the range of stages 12 through 17, the composite formed, with high frequency, a limb bud capped by an apical ectodermal ridge, and then developed into a supernumerary wing in which all proximodistal levels were represented. When either member of the combination was older than stage 17, only incomplete limbs, if any, were formed. Regardless of their orientation on the host, the supernumerary limbs always showed the axial characteristics appropriate to their side of origin.Supernumerary wings failed to form if the grafts were inserted into a space tunneled between flank ectoderm and its underlying mesoderm. If the covering ectoderm were deliberately torn and forced to heal over the graft, however, an ectodermal ridge formed and a supernumerary limb developed.It is concluded, therefore, that: (1) the wing-bud mesoderm, appropriately combined with flank ectoderm, has the property of morphological and axial self-differentiation by stage 12; (2) the apical ectodermal ridge is induced in flank ectoderm by prospective wing-bud mesoderm; (3) this inductive power is restricted to prospective wing-bud mesoderm from donors of stages 12 through 17; (4) the response competence is limited to flank ectoderm that has healed over the mesoderm; and (5) this competence is lost by the end of stage 17.     

Changes in the pericellular matrix during differentiation of limb bud mesoderm

Mesodermal cells in the developing chick embryo limb bud appear morphologically homogeneous until stage 21. At stage 22 the prechondrogenic and premyogenic areas begin to condense, culminating in the appearance of cartilage and muscle by stage 25-26. We have examined changes in the hyaluronate-dependent pericellular matrices elaborated by mesodermal cells of the limb bud from different developmental stages and the corresponding changes in production of cell surface-associated and secreted glycosaminoglycans. When placed in culture, most early mesodermal cells (stage 17 lateral plate and stage 19 limb bud) exhibited pericellular coats as visualized by the exclusion of particles. These coats were removed by treatment of the cultures with Streptomyces hyaluronidase. Cells from stage 20-21 limb buds (precondensation) had smaller coats, whereas cells derived from stage 22, 24, and 26 limb buds (condensed chondrogenic and myogenic regions) lacked coats. However, coats were reformed during subsequent cytodifferentiation of chondrocytes; chondrocytes from stage 28 and 30 limb buds, and more mature chondrocytes from stage 38 tibiae, had pericellular coats. Thus, cytodifferentiation of cartilage is accompanied by extensive intercellular matrix accumulation in vivo and reacquisition of pericellular coats in vitro. Although their structure was still dependent on hyaluronate, chondrocyte coats were associated with increased proteoglycan content compared to the coats of early mesodermal cells. The amount of incorporation of [3H]acetate into cell surface hyaluronate remained relatively constant from stages 17 to 38, whereas in the medium compartment, incorporation into hyaluronate was more than 4-fold greater by stage 17 and 19 mesodermal cells than by cells from stages between 20 and 38. However, there was a progressive increase in incorporation into cell surface and medium chondroitin sulfate throughout these developmental stages. Thus, at the time of cellular condensation in the limb bud in vivo, we have observed a reduction in size of hyaluronate-dependent pericellular coats and a dramatic change in the relative proportion of hyaluronate and chondroitin sulfate produced by the mesodermal cells in vitro.     

Chondrogenesis in mouse limb bud in vitro. I. Effect of the ectoderm

The role of the ectoderm in the chondrogenesis of mouse limb bud mesoderm was investigated in vitro at several developmental stages by analysis of the evolution of DNA content, the accumulation of sulfated glycosaminoglycans and histochemical procedures. Young limb buds or the undifferentiated apex of older buds (stages 17 and 19 of Theiler's table) from which the ectoderm had been removed with trypsin treatment initiated a large chondrogenesis but not morphogenesis. When the ectoderm was present, these limb buds showed a polarized proximal to distal outgrowth and differentiated skeletal primordia. Mesodermal cells of stage 20 limb bud apex were able to differentiate autopodial skeletons with or without the presence of the ectoderm: cartilaginous areas of the limb skeleton seem determined at this developmental stage. These results, which show the importance of the ectoderm in limb bud morphogenesis, are compared with results obtained using other methods with mouse or bird buds.     

FGF7 and FGF10 directly induce the apical ectodermal ridge in chick embryos.

During vertebrate limb development, the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) plays a vital role in both limb initiation and distal outgrowth of the limb bud. In the early chick embryo the prelimb bud mesoderm induces the AER in the overlying ectoderm. However, the direct inducer of the AER remains unknown. Here we report that FGF7 and FGF10, members of the fibroblast growth factor family, are the best candidates for the direct inducer of the AER. FGF7 induces an ectopic AER in the flank ectoderm of the chick embryo in a different manner from FGF1, -2, and -4 and activates the expression of Fgf8, an AER marker gene, in a cultured flank ectoderm without the mesoderm. Remarkably, FGF7 and FGF10 applied in the back induced an ectopic AER in the dorsal median ectoderm. Our results suggest that FGF7 and FGF10 directly induce the AER in the ectoderm both of the flank and of the dorsal midline and that these two regions have the competence for AER induction. Formation of the AER of the dorsal median ectoderm in the chick embryo is likely to appear as a vestige of the dorsal fin of the ancestors.     

Initiation of dorso-ventral axis during chick limb development

We analysed spatio-temporal expression of dorso-ventral genes - Wnt-7a, En-1, Lmx-1 and Fgf-8 - during both normal and ectopic limb formation following fibroblast growth factor (FGF) application to the flank. We confirm that Wnt-7a is the first of these genes to be expressed in dorsal ectoderm in limb-forming regions. We also noticed patterns and kinetics of gene expression specific to chick that could account for differences observed in ridge formation between chick and mouse. We find that Wnt-7a expression, in dorsal ectoderm, is rapidly and locally induced by FGF application. In contrast, ectopic induction of Lmx-1 expression, in dorsal mesoderm, is much slower, occurs first at a distance from the FGF-2 bead and seems initially independent of direct Wnt-7a signalling during FGF-2 limb induction. Finally, we show that there is no contribution to extra-limb mesoderm from normal limb mesoderm and confirm that flank cells give rise to the extra limb. Furthermore, we suggest that an inhibitor present in the flank normally prevents Lmx-1 expression in this region and restricts its expression to limb-forming regions.     

Effects of cytosine arabinoside, 6-aminonicotinamide, and 6-mercaptopurine riboside on ectoderm and mesoderm of mouse limb buds.

The effects of cytosine arabinoside, 6-aminonicotinamide, and 6-mercaptopurine riboside on the incorporation of [14C] glucose moieties and [32P] phosphate into acid-soluble material and lipids, RNA, DNA, and protein were measured in the dissected mesoderm and ectoderm of mouse limb buds at the 42-45 (day 11) somite stage. Due to the different proliferative capacities of the two tissues the incorporation of the precursors into mesodermal cells was considerably higher the than into ectodermal ones. Cytosine arabinoside inhibited the incorporation of the precursor moieties only into DNA, but very early after its application. This effect was more obvious in mesoderm than ectoderm. 6-Aminonicotinamide interfered only with glucose metabolism, whereas the incorporation of phosphate was not affected. 14C radioactivity in the various cell components was similarly reduced in mesoderm and ectoderm. 6-mercaptopurine riboside caused an increased incorporation of precursor material in all fractions studied in the mesoderm as well as in the ectoderm during the first 12 hours. This was succeeded by a dramatic decrease of incorporated 14C and 32P radioactivity. Differences of response in the tissues could not be detected with this drug. It is suggested that the malformations of the extrmities caused by these antimetabolites may be predominantly attributed to changes in the cell function rather than to gross effects on cell metabolism.     

Morphogenesis of the chick embryo limb. Competence of the embryonic and extra-embryonic ectoderm

Ecto-mesodermal interactions were investigated during the initiation of limb development in avian embryos. Experiments were performed on 2-day chick embryos. They consisted in implanting prospective leg mesoderm at different medio-lateral levels of the trunk and also into the extra-embryonic area. The implanted mesoderm was thus brought into contact with embryonic or extra-embryonic cicatricial or healing ectoderm, the ability of which to participate in the formation of an ectopic leg was tested. Whatever the level of embryonic ectoderm tested in hosts ranging from stage 14 to 27 pairs of somites (axial, paraxial, flank, ventrum), the experiments resulted in the formation of supernumerary limbs. Their frequency was level-dependent and decreased for each level, with increasing age of the host. The weakest competence was observed in the ectoderm of the prospective ventrum, the strongest in that of the prospective flank, axial and paraxial ectoderm showing an intermediary competence. Extra-embryonic ectoderm of blastoderms of the same age was unable to respond to the inducing action of the implanted prospective leg mesoderm. It was found to be incompetent, even at younger stages (5 to 13 pairs of somites).     

Spatial and temporal patterns of cell death in limb bud mesoderm after apical ectodermal ridge removal

A spatiotemporal pattern of cell death occurred in the chick wing and leg bud mesoderm after removal of apical ectodermal ridge at stages 18–20. Cells died in a region extending from the limb bud distal surface to 150–200 μm into the mesoderm. Limb buds from which ridge was removed at later stages in development did not exhibit a spatiotemporal pattern of cell death. In control experiments in which dorsal ectoderm was removed, a pattern of cell death did not occur. Removal of the ridge and part of the 150- to 200-μm zone of prospective cell death resulted in cell death in an area approximately equal to the amount of the zone remaining. After removal of all of the prospective zone of cell death plus the apical ridge, cell death was observed in the remaining limb bud mesoderm. In these limb buds, cell death occurred in a region in which it had not been seen in limb bud with apical ridge alone removed. We conclude that at stages 18–20 the mesodermal cells 150–200 μm beneath the ridge require the apical ridge to survive. More proximal mesodermal cells do not die after ridge removal alone, but apparently require the presence of the more distal mesoderm to survive. Whether this is a requirement for something intrinsic to the distal mesoderm or something it possesses by way of the ridge is unknown. After stage 23, the limb mesoderm cells do not die when the apical ridge is removed. Nevertheless, at the later stages, ridge continues to be required for limb bud proximal-distal elongation and the differentiation of distal limb elements.     

Pattern formation in epithelial development: the vertebrate limb and feather bud spacing.

The ectoderm of the vertebrate limb and feather bud are epithelia that provide good models for epithelial patterning in vertebrate development. At the tip of chick and mouse limb buds is a thickening, the apical ectodermal ridge, which is essential for limb bud outgrowth. The signal from the ridge to the underlying mesoderm involves fibroblast growth factors. The non-ridge ectoderm specifies the dorsoventral pattern of the bud and Wnt7a is a dorsalizing signal. The development of the ridge involves an interaction between dorsal cells that express radical fringe and those that do not. There are striking similarities between the signals and genes involved in patterning the limb ectoderm and the epithelia of the Drosophila imaginal disc that gives rise to the wing. The spacing of feather buds involves signals from the epidermis to the underlying mesenchyme, which again include Wnt7a and fibroblast growth factors.     

Disrupting the establishment of polarizing activity by teratogen exposure.

Between days 9.5 and 10, the forelimb buds of developing murine embryos progress from stage 1 which are just beginning to express shh and whose posterior mesoderm has only weak polarizing activity to stage 2 limbs with a distinguishable shh expression domain and full polarizing activity. We find that exposure on day 9.5 to teratogens that induce the loss of posterior skeletal elements disrupts the polarizing activity of the stage 2 postaxial mesoderm and polarizing activity is not subsequently restored. The ontogeny of expression of the mesodermal markers shh, ptc, bmp2, and hoxd-12 and 13, as well as the ectodermal markers wnt7a, fgf4, fgf8, cx43, and p21 occurred normally in day 9.5 teratogen-exposed limb buds. At stage 3, the treated limb apical ectodermal ridge usually possessed no detectable abnormalities, but with continued outgrowth postaxial deficiencies became evident. Recombining control, stage matched limb bud ectoderm with treated mesoderm prior to ZPA grafting restored the duplicating activity of treated ZPA tissue. We conclude that in addition to shh an early ectoderm-dependent signal is required for the establishment of the mouse ZPA and that this factor is dependent on the posterior ectoderm.     

Limb outgrowth in the chick embryo induced by dissociated and reaggregated cells of the apical ectodermal ridge.

Mesodermal cores of the stage 19 chick leg bud were capped with an intact apical ectodermal ridge (AER) or with strips cut from centrifugal pellets formed from Pronase-dissociated AERs. They were then covered with embryonic back-skin ectoderm and grown as grafts to the somite region of a host embryo. Control mesoderms were capped with centrifugal aggregates of nonridge limb ectoderm or similarly treated back-skin ectoderm, with ethanol-killed AERs or with no ectodermal cells other than the enveloping back-skin ectoderm.Controls were vascularized slowly and atypically and showed little outgrowth, forming only proximal skeletal structures. Recombinants equipped with AER cells were vascularized more fully and promptly and began vigorous growth after brief delay, forming legs with all skeletal segments represented, including claw-tipped toes. The latter were arranged in anteroposterior order corresponding to the original polarity of the mesoderm.Histological sections of recombinants made with cytologically distinctive quail AERs reveal that the cap of ridge cells, whether initially intact or reaggregated beneath the back-skin envelope, undergo a period of reorganization, forming a typical AER at the apex of the chimeric appendage after 48 hr. Meanwhile vigorous growth of the recombinant continues.These results show that the AER can cooperate with nonlimb ectoderm in promoting the morphogenesis of successively more distal levels of the limb skeleton. They also show that dissociated ridge cells can reorganize a typical AER at the apex of the limb mesoblast, meanwhile exercising their inductive effect on it.