Rhythmic coupling among cells in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

In mammals, the part of the nervous system responsible for most circadian behavior can be localized to a pair of structures in the hypothalamus known as the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Previous studies suggest that the basic mechanism responsible for the generation of these rhythms is intrinsic to individual cells. There is also evidence that the cells within the SCN are coupled to one another and that this coupling is important for the normal functioning of the circadian system. One mechanism that mediates coordinated electrical activity is direct electrical connections between cells formed by gap junctions. In the present study, we used a brain slice preparation to show that developing SCN cells are dye coupled. Dye coupling was observed in both the ventrolateral and dorsomedial subdivisions of the SCN and was blocked by application of a gap junction inhibitor, halothane. Dye coupling in the SCN appears to be regulated by activity-dependent mechanisms as both tetrodotoxin and the GABA(A) agonist muscimol inhibited the extent of coupling. Furthermore, acute hyperpolarization of the membrane potential of the original biocytin-filled neuron decreased the extent of coupling. SCN cells were extensively dye coupled during the day when the cells exhibit synchronous neural activity but were minimally dye coupled during the night when the cells are electrically silent. Immunocytochemical analysis provides evidence that a gap-junction-forming protein, connexin32, is expressed in the SCN of postnatal animals. Together the results are consistent with a model in which gap junctions provide a means to couple SCN neurons on a circadian basis.     

Noise Induces Oscillation and Synchronization of the Circadian Neurons

The principle clock of mammals, named suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), coordinates the circadian rhythms of behavioral and physiological activity to the external 24 h light-dark cycle. In the absence of the daily cycle, the SCN acts as an endogenous clock that regulates the ~24h rhythm of activity. Experimental and theoretical studies usually take the light-dark cycle as a main external influence, and often ignore light pollution as an external influence. However, in modern society, the light pollution such as induced by electrical lighting influences the circadian clock. In the present study, we examined the effect of external noise (light pollution) on the collective behavior of coupled circadian oscillators under constant darkness using a Goodwin model. We found that the external noise plays distinct roles in the network behavior of neurons for weak or strong coupling between the neurons. In the case of strong coupling, the noise reduces the synchronization and the period of the SCN network. Interestingly, in the case of weak coupling, the noise induces a circadian rhythm in the SCN network which is absent in noise-free condition. In addition, the noise increases the synchronization and decreases the period of the SCN network. Our findings may shed new light on the impact of the external noise on the collective behavior of SCN neurons.     

Modeling the spontaneous activity in suprachiasmatic nucleus neurons: Role of cation single channels

A population of interconnected neurons of the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) controls circadian rhythms in physiological functions. In turn, a circadian rhythm of individual neurons is driven by intracellular processes, which via activation of specific membrane channels, produce circadian modulation of electrical firing rate. Yet the membrane target(s) of the cellular clock have remained enigmatic. Previously, subthreshold voltage-dependent cation (SVC) channels have been proposed as the membrane target of the cellular clock responsible for circadian modulation of the firing rate in SCN neurons. We tested this hypothesis with computational modeling based on experimental results from on-cell recording of SVC channel openings in acutely isolated SCN neurons and long-term continuous recording of activity from dispersed SCN neurons in a multielectrode array dish (MED). The model reproduced the circadian behavior if the number of SVC channels or their kinetics were modulated in accordance with protein concentration in a model of the intracellular clock (Scheper et al., 1999. J. Neurosci. 19, 40-47). Such modulation changed the average firing rate of the model neuron from zero (“subjective-night” silence) up to 18 Hz (“subjective-day” peak). Furthermore, the variability of interspike intervals (ISI) and the circadian pattern of firing rate (i.e. silence-to-activity ratio and shape of circadian peaks) are in reasonable agreement with experimental data obtained in dispersed SCN neurons in MED. These results suggest that the variability of ISI in intact SCN neurons is mostly due to stochastic single-channel openings, and that the circadian pattern of the firing rate is specified by threshold properties of dependence of the spontaneous firing rate on the number of single channels (R-N relationship). This plausible mathematical modeling supports the hypothesis that SVC channels could be a critical element in circadian modulation of firing rate in SCN neurons.     

Simulation of circadian rhythm generation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus with locally coupled self-sustained oscillators

In mammals, circadian rhythms are driven by a pacemaker located in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the anterior hypothalamus. The firing rate of neurons within the SCN exhibits a circadian rhythm. There is evidence that individual neurons within the SCN act as circadian oscillators. Rhythm generation in the SCN was therefore modeled by a system of self-sustained oscillators. The model is composed of up to 10000 oscillatory elements arranged in a square array. Each oscillator has its own (randomly determined) intrinsic period reflecting the widely dispersed periods observed in the SCN. The model behavior was investigated mainly in the absence of synchronizing zeitgebers. Due to local coupling the oscillators synchronized and an overall rhythm emerged. This indicates that a locally coupled system is capable of integrating the output of individual clock cells with widely dispersed periods. The period of the global output (average of all oscillators) corresponded to the average of the intrinsic periods and was stable even for small amplitudes and during transients. Noise, reflecting biological fluctuations at the cellular level, distorted the global rhythm in small arrays. The period of the rhythm could be stabilized by increasing the array size, which thus increased the robustness against noise. Since different regions of the SCN have separate output pathways, the array of oscillators was subdivided into four quadrants. Sudden deviations of periodicity sometimes appeared in one quadrant, while the periods of the other quadrants were largely unaffected. This result could represent a model for splitting, which has been observed in animal experiments. In summary, the multi-oscillator model of the SCN showed a broad repertoire of dynamic patterns, revealed a stable period (even during transients) with robustness against noise, and was able to account for such a complex physiological behavior as splitting.     

Restoration of Orcadian Behavior by Anterior Hypothalamic Grafts Containing the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus: Graft/Host Interconnections

Destruction of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) disrupts circadian behavior. Transplanting SCN tissue from fetal donors into SCN-lesioned recipients can restore circadian behavior to the arhythmic hosts. In the transplantation model employing fetal hamster donors and SCN-lesioned hamsters as hosts, the period of the restored circadian behavior is hamster-typical. However, when fetal rat anterior hypothalamic tissue containing the SCN is implanted into SCN-lesioned rats, the period of the restored circadian rhythm is only rarely typical of that of the intact rat. The use of an anterior hypothalamic heterograft model provides new approaches to donor specificity of restored circadian behavior and with the aid of species-specific markers, provides a means for assessing connectivity between the graft and the host. Using an antibody that stains rat and mouse neuronal tissue but not hamster neurons, it has been demonstrated that rat and mouse anterior hypothalamic heterografts containing the SCN send numerous processes into the host (hamster) neuropil surrounding the graft, consistent with graft efferents reported in other hypothalamic transplantation models in which graft and host tissue can be differentiated (i.e., Brattleboro rat and hypogonadal mouse). Moreover, SCN neurons within anterior hypothalamic grafts send an appropriately restricted set of efferent projections to the host brain which may participate in the functional recovery of circadian locomotor activity.     

In vivo monitoring of circadian timing in freely moving mice

In mammals, the principal circadian pacemaker driving daily physiology and behavioral rhythms is located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the anterior hypothalamus. The neural output of SCN is essential for the circadian regulation of behavioral activity. Although remarkable progress has been made in revealing the molecular basis of circadian rhythm generation within the SCN, the output pathways by which the SCN exert control over circadian rhythms are not well understood. Most SCN efferents target the subparaventricular zone (SPZ), which resides just dorsal to the SCN. This output pathway has been proposed as a major component involved in the outflow for circadian regulation. We have examined the downstream pathway of the central clock by means of multiunit neural activity (MUA) in freely moving mice. SCN neural activity is tightly coupled to environmental photic input and anticorrelated with MUA rhythm in the SPZ. In Clock mutant mice exhibiting attenuated circadian locomotor rhythmicity, MUA rhythmicity in the SCN and SPZ is similarly blunted. These results suggest that the SPZ plays a functional role in relaying circadian and photic signals to centers involved in generating behavioral activity.     

Multiple oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus is the site of the pacemaker that controls circadian rhythms of a variety of physiological functions. Data strongly indicate the majority of the SCN neurons express self-sustaining oscillations that can be detected as rhythms in the spontaneous firing of individual neurons. The period of single SCN neurons in a dissociated cell culture is dispersed in a wide range (from 20h to 28h in rats), but that of the locomotor rhythm is close to 24h, suggesting individual oscillators are coupled to generate an averaged circadian period in the nucleus. Electrical coupling via gap junctions, glial regulation, calcium spikes, ephaptic interactions, extracellular ion flux, and diffusible substances have been discussed as possible mechanisms that mediate the interneuronal rhythm synchrony. Recently, GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid), a major neurotransmitter in the SCN, was reported to regulate cellular communication and to synchronize rhythms through GABA_A receptors. At present, subsequent intracellular processes that are able to reset the genetic loop of oscillations are unknown. There may be diverse mechanisms for integrating the multiple circadian oscillators in the SCN. This article reviews the knowledge about the various circadian oscillations intrinsic to the SCN, with particular focus on the intercellular signaling of coupled oscillators. (Chronobiology International, 18(3), 371-387, 2001)     

The role of Clock in the plasticity of circadian entrainment

The mammalian circadian clock lying in suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is synchronized to about 24 h by the environmental light-dark cycle (LD). The circadian clock exhibits limits of entrainment above and below 24 h, beyond which it will not entrain. Little is known about the mechanisms regulating the limits of entrainment. In this study, we show that wild-type mice entrain to only an LD 24 h cycle, whereas Clock mutant mice can entrain to an LD 24, 28, and 32 h except for LD 20 h and LD 36 h cycle. Under an LD 28 h cycle, Clock mutant mice showed a clear rhythm in Per2 mRNA expression in the SCN and behavior. Light response was also increased. This is the first report to show that the Clock mutation makes it possible to adapt the circadian oscillator to a long period cycle and indicates that the clock gene may have an important role for the limits of entrainment of the SCN to LD cycle.     

Cardiovascular control by the suprachiasmatic nucleus: neural and neuroendocrine mechanisms in human and rat

The risk for cardiovascular incidents is highest in the early morning, which seems partially due to endogenous factors. Endogenous circadian rhythms in mammalian physiology and behavior are regulated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Recently, anatomical evidence has been provided that SCN functioning is disturbed in patients with essential hypertension. Here we review neural and neuroendocrine mechanisms by which the SCN regulates the cardiovascular system. First, we discuss evidence for an endogenous circadian rhythm in cardiac activity, both in humans and rats, which is abolished after SCN lesioning in rats. The immediate impact of retinal light exposure at night on SCN-output to the cardiovascular system, which signals 'day' in both diurnal (human) and nocturnal (rat) mammals with opposite effects on physiology, is discussed. Furthermore, we discuss the impact of melatonin treatment on the SCN and its potential medical relevance in patients with essential hypertension. Finally, we argue that regional differentiation of the SCN and autonomous nervous system is required to explain the multitude of circadian rhythms. Insights into the mechanisms by which the SCN affects the cardiovascular system may provide new strategies for the treatment of disease conditions known to coincide with circadian rhythm disturbances, as is presented for essential hypertension.     

Organotypic Suprachiasmatic Nuclei Cultures of Adult Voles Reflect Locomotor Behavior: Differences in Number of Vasopressin Cells

This study is the first to demonstrate organotypic culturing of adult suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). This approach was used to obtain organotypic SCN cultures from adult vole brain with a previously determined state of behavioral circadian rhythmicity. We examined vasopressin (AVP) immunoreactivity in these organotypic slice cultures. AVP is one of the major neuropeptides produced by the SCN, the main mammalian circadian pacemaker. AVP immunoreactivity in the SCN of adult common voles in vivo has been shown to correlate with the variability in expression of circadian wheel-running behavior. Here, cultures prepared from circadian rhythmic and nonrhythmic voles were processed immunocytochemically for AVP. Whereas in all cultures AVP could be observed, AVP immunoreactivity differed considerably between vole SCN cultures. SCN cultures from rhythmic voles contained significantly lower numbers of AVP immunoreactive (AVPir) cells per surface area than cultures from nonrhythmic voles. The correlation between timing of behavior and AVP immunoreactivity in vitro is similar to the correlation found earlier in vivo. Apparently, such correlation depends on intrinsic AVP regulation mechanisms of SCN tissue, and not on neural or hormonal input from the environment, as present in intact brain.     

The mammalian circadian clock shop.

In mammals, a master circadian pacemaker driving daily rhythms in behavior and physiology resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The SCN contains multiple circadian oscillators that synchronize to environmental cycles and to each other in vivo. Rhythm production, an intracellular event, depends on more than eight identified genes. The period of the rhythms within the SCN also depends upon intercellular communication. Many other tissues also retain the ability to generate near 24 -h periodicities although their place in the organization of circadian timing is still unclear. This paper focuses on the tissue-, cellular- and molecular-level events that generate and entrain circadian rhythms in behavior in mammals and emphasizes the apparent differences between the SCN and peripheral oscillators.     

Synchronization-induced rhythmicity of circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus

The suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) host a robust, self-sustained circadian pacemaker that coordinates physiological rhythms with the daily changes in the environment. Neuronal clocks within the SCN form a heterogeneous network that must synchronize to maintain timekeeping activity. Coherent circadian output of the SCN tissue is established by intercellular signaling factors, such as vasointestinal polypeptide. It was recently shown that besides coordinating cells, the synchronization factors play a crucial role in the sustenance of intrinsic cellular rhythmicity. Disruption of intercellular signaling abolishes sustained rhythmicity in a majority of neurons and desynchronizes the remaining rhythmic neurons. Based on these observations, the authors propose a model for the synchronization of circadian oscillators that combines intracellular and intercellular dynamics at the single-cell level. The model is a heterogeneous network of circadian neuronal oscillators where individual oscillators are damped rather than self-sustained. The authors simulated different experimental conditions and found that: (1) in normal, constant conditions, coupled circadian oscillators quickly synchronize and produce a coherent output; (2) in large populations, such oscillators either synchronize or gradually lose rhythmicity, but do not run out of phase, demonstrating that rhythmicity and synchrony are codependent; (3) the number of oscillators and connectivity are important for these synchronization properties; (4) slow oscillators have a higher impact on the period in mixed populations; and (5) coupled circadian oscillators can be efficiently entrained by light–dark cycles. Based on these results, it is predicted that: (1) a majority of SCN neurons needs periodic synchronization signal to be rhythmic; (2) a small number of neurons or a low connectivity results in desynchrony; and (3) amplitudes and phases of neurons are negatively correlated. The authors conclude that to understand the orchestration of timekeeping in the SCN, intracellular circadian clocks cannot be isolated from their intercellular communication components.