Mismatch repair

Specific repair systems are activated in response to DNA lesions. Mismatch repair protects the genome of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells from errors arising during replication or induced by mutagenic factors. The mismatch repair system distinguishes between the newly synthesized and pattern DNA strands by the extent of methylation and checks the accuracy of genetic information after homologous recombination. Very short-patch repair corrects mismatches in CC(A/T)GG sites. The 8-oxoguanine system is independent of DNA hemimethylation and removes oxidized bases from prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Mutations of repair genes increase mutagenesis in prokaryotic cells and cause colorectal cancer in humans. The review considers the repair mechanisms and the role of repair defects in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.     

Methylation in eucaryotes influences the repair of G/T and A/C DNA basepair mismatches

Although methylation of DNA at some sites regulates gene expression, 5mC at many sites does not appear to have any effect. We present evidence that hemimethylation at many different sites can act as a discrimination signal in mismatch repair. Deamination of 5mC in a symmetrically methylated doublet CpG yields the mismatched base pair T/G in a hemi-methylated doublet pair. Because both bases in the mismatched pair are normal constituents of DNA, identifying the incorrect base is problematic. The only apparent distinction of the two is the methylation on the strand opposite the deamination event. Using available methylases we have produced hemi-methylated SV40 DNAs that are mismatched at a single T/G or A/C basepair in a sequence that mimics the lesion resulting from the deamination of a 5mCpG. Methylation at the adjacent cytosine results in the replacement of the T much more frequently than when no methylation is present in the heteroduplex. Cytosine methylation at sites farther removed from the mismatch is equally effective in replacing the incorrect T at the mismatch. Although methylation in vertebrates is almost exclusively on cytosine in the doublet CpG, methylation of cytosines in other doublets, as well as methylation of adenosine, also act as strand discrimination signals. Perhaps some of the excess methylation in vertebrate DNAs may serve to direct mismatch repair.     

Statistical evidence for a biochemical pathway of natural, sequence-targeted G/C to C/G transversion mutagenesis in Haemophilus influenzae Rd.

Markov chain analysis of the Haemophilus influenzae Rd genome reveals striking under-representation of three palindromic tetranucleotide strings (CCGG, GGCC and CATG), accompanied by over-representation of six tetranucleotide strings that are derived from the former by exchanging strand location of the two residues making up a G/C nucleotide pair at the terminal palindrome position. Constraints are outlined for a molecular model able to explain the phenomenon as the result of sequence-targeted, enzyme-driven G/C to C/G transversion mutagenesis. Possible participation in the process by components of known DNA mismatch repair or restriction/modification systems (in particular, cytosine methylation) is discussed. The effect widens the spectrum of enzyme-driven, specific mutagenesis beyond the formerly described C/G to T/A transition (VSP repair of Escherichia coli). Potential evolutionary benefits of enzymatic pathways of specific mutagenesis can be envisioned.     

The function of Asp70, Glu77 and Lys79 in the Escherichia coli MutH protein

The MutH protein, which is part of the Dam-directed mismatch repair system of Escherichia coli, introduces nicks in the unmethylated strand of a hemi-methylated DNA duplex. The latent endonuclease activity of MutH is activated by interaction with MutL, another member of the repair system. The crystal structure of MutH suggested that the active site residues include Asp70, Glu77 and Lys79, which are located at the bottom of a cleft where DNA binding probably occurs. We mutated these residues to alanines and found that the mutant proteins were unable to complement a chromosomal mutH deletion. The purified mutant proteins were able to bind to DNA with a hemi-methylated GATC sequence but had no detectable endonuclease activity with or without MutL. Although the data are consistent with the prediction of a catalytic role for Asp70, Glu77 and Lys79, it cannot be excluded that they are also involved in binding to MutL.     

Yeast origins establish a strand bias for replicational mutagenesis

To determine whether replicational mutagenesis in the yeast genome is influenced by the positions of active origins, a reporter gene was placed in two orientations at multiple locations within a 39,000 bp region of chromosome III possessing two strong origins. The frequency of mutations resulting from misincorporation of adenine opposite 8-hydroxyguanine in one strand and 6-hydroxylaminopurine opposite cytosine in the other strand differed by 3- to 10-fold, depending on the gene orientation and its distance from the origins. The observed patterns indicate that active origins establish a strand bias for mutations that is maintained over thousands of base pairs and results from lower nucleotide selectivity and/or less efficient proofreading or mismatch repair during leading strand DNA replication.     

Atomic force microscopy captures the initiation of methyl-directed DNA mismatch repair

In Escherichia coli, errors in newly-replicated DNA, such as the incorporation of a nucleotide with a mis-paired base or an accidental insertion or deletion of nucleotides, are corrected by a methyl-directed mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. While the enzymology of MMR has long been established, many fundamental aspects of its mechanisms remain elusive, such as the structures, compositions, and orientations of complexes of MutS, MutL, and MutH as they initiate repair. Using atomic force microscopy, we—for the first time—record the structures and locations of individual complexes of MutS, MutL and MutH bound to DNA molecules during the initial stages of mismatch repair. This technique reveals a number of striking and unexpected structures, such as the growth and disassembly of large multimeric complexes at mismatched sites, complexes of MutS and MutL anchoring latent MutH onto hemi-methylated d(GATC) sites or bound themselves at nicks in the DNA, and complexes directly bridging mismatched and hemi-methylated d(GATC) sites by looping the DNA. The observations from these single-molecule studies provide new opportunities to resolve some of the long-standing controversies in the field and underscore the dynamic heterogeneity and versatility of MutSLH complexes in the repair process.     

Genomic approaches to DNA repair and mutagenesis

DNA damage is a constant threat to cells, causing cytotoxicity as well as inducing genetic alterations. The steady-state abundance of DNA lesions in a cell is minimized by a variety of DNA repair mechanisms, including DNA strand break repair, mismatch repair, nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, and ribonucleotide excision repair. The efficiencies and mechanisms by which these pathways remove damage from chromosomes have been primarily characterized by investigating the processing of lesions at defined genomic loci, among bulk genomic DNA, on episomal DNA constructs, or using in vitro substrates. However, the structure of a chromosome is heterogeneous, consisting of heavily protein-bound heterochromatic regions, open regulatory regions, actively transcribed genes, and even areas of transient single stranded DNA. Consequently, DNA repair pathways function in a much more diverse set of chromosomal contexts than can be readily assessed using previous methods. Recent efforts to develop whole genome maps of DNA damage, repair processes, and even mutations promise to greatly expand our understanding of DNA repair and mutagenesis. Here we review the current efforts to utilize whole genome maps of DNA damage and mutation to understand how different chromosomal contexts affect DNA excision repair pathways.     

Structural basis for MutH activation in E.coli mismatch repair and relationship of MutH to restriction endonucleases.

MutS, MutL and MutH are the three essential proteins for initiation of methyl-directed DNA mismatch repair to correct mistakes made during DNA replication in Escherichia coli. MutH cleaves a newly synthesized and unmethylated daughter strand 5' to the sequence d(GATC) in a hemi-methylated duplex. Activation of MutH requires the recognition of a DNA mismatch by MutS and MutL. We have crystallized MutH in two space groups and solved the structures at 1.7 and 2.3 A resolution, respectively. The active site of MutH is located at an interface between two subdomains that pivot relative to one another, as revealed by comparison of the crystal structures, and this presumably regulates the nuclease activity. The relative motion of the two subdomains in MutH correlates with the position of a protruding C-terminal helix. This helix appears to act as a molecular lever through which MutS and MutL may communicate the detection of a DNA mismatch and activate MutH. With sequence homology to Sau3AI and structural similarity to PvuII endonuclease, MutH is clearly related to these enzymes by divergent evolution, and this suggests that type II restriction endonucleases evolved from a common ancestor.     

Processing of mispaired and unpaired bases in heteroduplex DNA in E. coli

Bacteriophage lambda and phi X 174 DNAs, carrying sequenced mutations, have been used to construct in vitro defined species of heteroduplex DNA. Such heteroduplex DNAs were introduced by transfection, as single copies, into E. coli host cells. The progeny of individual heteroduplex molecules from each infective center was analyzed. The effect of the presence of GATC sequences (phi X 174 system) and of their methylation (lambda system) was tested. The following conclusions can be drawn: some mismatched base pairs trigger the process of mismatch repair, causing a localized strand-to-strand information transfer in heteroduplex DNA: transition mismatches G:T and A:C are efficiently repaired, whereas the six transversion mismatches are not always readily recognized and/or repaired. The recognition of transversion mismatches appears to depend on the neighbouring nucleotide sequence; single unpaired bases (frameshift mutation "mismatches") are recognized and repaired, some equally efficiently on both strands (longer and shorter), some more efficiently on the shorter (-1) strand; large non-homologies (about 800 bases) are not repaired by the Mut H, L, S, U system, but some other process repairs the non-homology with a relatively low efficiency; full methylation of GATC sequences inhibits mismatch repair on the methylated strand: this is the chemical basis of strand discrimination (old/new) in mismatch correction; unmethylated GATC sequences appear to improve mismatch repair of a G:T mismatch in phi X 174 DNA, but there may be some residual mismatch repair in GATC-free phi X 174, at least for some mismatches.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Structure and function of mismatch repair proteins

DNA mismatch repair is required for maintaining genomic stability and is highly conserved from prokaryotes to eukaryotes. Errors made during DNA replication, such as deletions, insertions and mismatched basepairs, are substrates for mismatch repair. Mismatch repair is strand-specific and targets only the newly synthesized daughter strand. To initiate mismatch repair in Escherichia coli, three proteins are essential, MutS, for mismatch recognition, MutH, for introduction of a nick in the target strand, and MutL, for mediating the interactions between MutH and MutS. Homologues of MutS and MutL important for mismatch repair have been found in nearly all organisms. Mutations in MutS and MutL homologues have been linked to increased cancer susceptibility in both mice and humans. Here, we review the crystal structures of the MutH endonuclease, a conserved ATPase fragment of MutL (LN40), and complexes of LN40 with various nucleotides. Based on the crystal structure, the active site of MutH has been identified and an evolutionary relationship between MutH and type II restriction endonucleases established. Recent crystallographic and biochemical studies have revealed that MutL operates as a molecular switch with its interactions with MutH and MutS regulated by ATP binding and hydrolysis. These crystal structures also shed light on the general mechanism of mismatch repair and the roles of Mut proteins in preventing mutagenesis.     

环境胁迫诱导的细胞适应性突变

细胞具有普遍的突变和进化能力, 如病原菌的抗药性、工业菌株的适应性和人体细胞的癌变等, 但是细胞的适应性突变是如何产生的呢？通过非致死性突变分析模型的建立与应用, 产生了新的适应性进化观点, 即环境胁迫诱导细胞适应性突变。这种环境诱导的细胞突变过程涉及多方面的生理调控, 包括细胞内毒性物质(如氧活性物质)积累并造成DNA损伤、DNA错配修复的活性受到抑制、胞内RpoS反应和SOS反应被激活等。这些反应使胞内高保真的DNA复制状态转变为低保真的DNA修复状态, 提高胞内突变率和重组活性。此外, 基因转录影响基因组的不稳定, 容易产生DNA损伤, 并造成局部的高突变率, 即形成了转录偶联的DNA修复与突变为基础的适应性突变观点。文章围绕环境胁迫诱导细胞突变率增加和转录偶联的DNA修复与突变这两种适应性突变分子机制, 阐述其相关的研究进展, 以期更好地理解环境条件诱导细胞发生适应性突变的过程。     

Statistical evaluation and biological interpretation of non-random abundance in the E. coli K-12 genome of tetra- and pentanucleotide sequences related to VSP DNA mismatch repair.

The abundance of all tetra- and pentanucleotide sequences is calculated for a set of DNA sequence data comprising 767,393 nucleotides of the E. coli K-12 genome. Observed frequencies are compared to those expected from a Markov chain prediction algorithm. Systematic and extreme non-random representations are found for special sets of sequences. These are interpreted as arising from incorporation of a 2'-deoxyguanosine residue opposite thymidine during replication which, in special sequence contexts, leads to a T/G mismatch that is simultaneously substrate for two competing DNA mismatch repair systems: the mutHLS and the VSP pathway. Processing by the former leads to error correction, by the latter to mutation fixation. The significance of the latter process, as demonstrated here, makes it unlikely that VSP repair has evolved mainly as a mutation avoidance mechanism. It is proposed that in E. coli K-12, VSP repair, together with DNA cytosine methylation, constitutes a mutagenesis/recombination system capable of promoting gene-conversion-like unidirectional transfer of short stretches of DNA sequence.     

A DNA methyltransferase can protect the genome from postdisturbance attack by a restriction-modification gene complex

In prokaryotic genomes, some DNA methyltransferases form a restriction-modification gene complex, but some others are present by themselves. Dcm gene product, one of these orphan methyltransferases found in Escherichia coli and related bacteria, methylates DNA to generate 5'-C(m)CWGG just as some of its eukaryotic homologues do. Vsr mismatch repair function of an adjacent gene prevents C-to-T mutagenesis enhanced by this methylation but promotes other types of mutation and likely has affected genome evolution. The reason for the existence of the dcm-vsr gene pair has been unclear. Earlier we found that several restriction-modification gene complexes behave selfishly in that their loss from a cell leads to cell killing through restriction attack on the genome. There is also increasing evidence for their potential mobility. EcoRII restriction-modification gene complex recognizes the same sequence as Dcm, and its methyltransferase is phylogenetically related to Dcm. In the present work, we found that stabilization of maintenance of a plasmid by linkage of EcoRII gene complex, likely through postsegregational cell killing, is diminished by dcm function. Disturbance of EcoRII restriction-modification gene complex led to extensive chromosome degradation and severe loss of cell viability. This cell killing was partially suppressed by chromosomal dcm and completely abolished by dcm expressed from a plasmid. Dcm, therefore, can play the role of a "molecular vaccine" by defending the genome against parasitism by a restriction-modification gene complex.     

Evidence for preferential mismatch repair of lagging strand DNA replication errors in yeast

Duplex DNA is replicated in the 5'-3' direction by coordinated copying of leading and lagging strand templates with somewhat different proteins and mechanics, providing the potential for differences in the fidelity of replication of the two strands. We previously showed that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, active replication origins establish a strand bias in the rate of base substitutions resulting from replication of unrepaired 8-oxo-guanine (GO) in DNA. Lower mutagenesis was associated with replicating lagging strand templates. Here, we test the hypothesis that this bias is due to more efficient repair of lagging stand mismatches by measuring mutation rates in ogg1 strains with a reporter allele in two orientations at loci on opposite sides of a replication origin on chromosome III. We compare a MMR-proficient strain to strains deleted for the MMR genes MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, or EXOI. Loss of MMR reduces the strand bias by preferentially increasing mutagenesis for lagging strand replication. We conclude that GO-A mismatches generated during lagging strand replication are more efficiently repaired. This is consistent with the hypothesis that 5' ends of Okazaki fragments and PCNA, present at high density during lagging strand replication, are used as strand discrimination signals for mismatch repair in vivo.     

Novel PMS1 alleles preferentially affect the repair of primer strand loops during DNA replication

Null mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes elevate both base substitutions and insertions/deletions in simple sequence repeats. Data suggest that during replication of simple repeat sequences, polymerase slippage can generate single-strand loops on either the primer or template strand that are subsequently processed by the MMR machinery to prevent insertions and deletions, respectively. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammalian cells, MMR appears to be more efficient at repairing mispairs comprised of loops on the template strand compared to loops on the primer strand. We identified two novel yeast pms1 alleles, pms1-G882E and pms1-H888R, which confer a strong defect in the repair of "primer strand" loops, while maintaining efficient repair of "template strand" loops. Furthermore, these alleles appear to affect equally the repair of 1-nucleotide primer strand loops during both leading- and lagging-strand replication. Interestingly, both pms1 mutants are proficient in the repair of 1-nucleotide loop mispairs in heteroduplex DNA generated during meiotic recombination. Our results suggest that the inherent inefficiency of primer strand loop repair is not simply a mismatch recognition problem but also involves Pms1 and other proteins that are presumed to function downstream of mismatch recognition, such as Mlh1. In addition, the findings reinforce the current view that during mutation avoidance, MMR is associated with the replication apparatus.     

DNA损伤修复机制——解读2015年诺贝尔化学奖

Tomas Lindahl, Paul Modrich和Aziz Sancar三位科学家因发现“DNA损伤修复机制”获得了2015年诺贝尔化学奖．Lindahl首次发现Escherichia Coli中参与碱基切除修复的第一个蛋白质--尿嘧啶 DNA糖基化酶（UNG）; Modrich重建了错配修复的体外系统,从大肠杆菌到哺乳动物深入探究了错配修复的机制; Sancar利用纯化的UvrA、UvrB、UvrC重建了核苷酸切除修复的关键步骤,阐述了核苷酸切除修复的分子机制．DNA损伤是由生物所处体外环境和体内因素共同导致的,面对不同种类的损伤,机体启动多种不同的修复机制修复损伤,保护基因组稳定性．这些修复机制包括：光修复(light repairing);核苷酸切除修复（nucleotide excision repair, NER）;碱基切除修复（base excision repair, BER）;错配修复（mismatch repair, MMR）;以及DNA双链断裂修复（DNA double strand breaks repair, DSBR）．其中DNA双链断裂修复又分同源重组（homologous recombination, HR）和非同源末端连接（non homologous end joining, NHEJ）两种方式．本文将对上述几种修复的机制进行总结与讨论．     

Construction and characterization of mismatch-containing circular DNA molecules competent for assessment of nick-directed human mismatch repair in vitro

The ability of cell-free extracts to correct DNA mismatches has been demonstrated in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Such an assay requires a template containing both a mismatch and a strand discrimination signal, and the multi-step construction process can be technically difficult. We have developed a three-step procedure for preparing DNA heteroduplexes containing a site-specific nick. The mismatch composition, sequence context, distance to the strand signal, and the means for assessing repair in each strand are adjustable features built into a synthetic oligonucleotide. Controlled ligation events involving three of the four DNA strands incorporate the oligonucleotide into a circular template and generate the repair-directing nick. Mismatch correction in either strand of a prototype G·T mismatch was achieved by placing a nick 10–40 bp away from the targeted base. This proximity of nick and mismatch represents a setting where repair has not been well characterized, but the presence of a nick was shown to be essential, as was the MSH2/MSH6 heterodimer, although low levels of repair occurred in extract defective in each protein. All repair events were inhibited by a peptide that interacts with proliferating cell nuclear antigen and inhibits both mismatch repair and long-patch replication.     

Mismatch repair and the fidelity of genetic recombination

Two modes of mismatch repair are known to operate in bacteria: long-patch mismatch repair and very short patch mismatch repair. Very short patch mismatch repair systems act on a specific mismatch by conserving only one base pair. Therefore, when very short patch mismatch repair acts on heteroduplex recombination intermediates, it hyper-recombines specific markers by creating patchwork sequences, i.e., apparent multiple exchange events, on the repaired strand. Long-patch mismatch repair is antirecombinagenic, apparently by decomposing heteroduplex DNA or aborting its formation whenever well-recognized mismatches are formed by strand exchange between nonidentical parental sequences. It is postulated here that mismatch-stimulated antirecombination by long-patch mismatch repair is a "proofreading" system assuring high fidelity of homologous recombination. This accounts for chromosomal stability in eucaryotes (i.e., the rare occurrence of chromosomal aberrations and mitotic recombination versus the high frequency of precise sister chromatid exchange), suggests a role for diverged repetitive and other noncoding sequences as chromosomal antirecombination elements, and provides a molecular mechanism for speciation without the necessity of geographical separation.     

Repair of Single Base-Pair Transversion Mismatches of Escherichia Coli in Vitro: Correction of Certain a/G Mismatches Is Independent of Dam Methylation and Host Muthls Gene Functions

Six different base-pair transversion mismatches are repaired with different efficiencies in an in vitro mismatch repair system. In particular, the T/T and C/C mismatches appear to be less efficiently repaired than the A/A and G/G mismatches. Four A/G and four C/T mismatches at different positions are repaired to different extents. One of the A/G mismatches is repaired equally efficiently when DNA heteroduplexes are fully methylated or hemi-methylated at the d(GATC) sequences. This type of mismatch repair appears to be unidirectional with A to C conversion by acting at A/G mispairs to restore the C/G pairs. This methylation-independent correction is not controlled by the mutH, mutL, mutS, uvrE, uvrB, phr, recA, recF, and recJ gene products. The independence of the transversion mismatch repair of these genes and methylation distinguishes this from the known mismatch repair pathways.