Joint Modeling of Multivariate Longitudinal Data and Competing Risks Using Multiphase Sub-models

In many clinical studies that involve follow-up, it is common to observe one or more sequences of longitudinal measurements, as well as one or more time to event outcomes. A competing risks situation arises when the probability of occurrence of one event is altered/hindered by another time to event. Recently, there has been much attention paid to the joint analysis of a single longitudinal response and a single time to event outcome, when the missing data mechanism in the longitudinal process is non-ignorable. We, in this paper, propose an extension where multiple longitudinal responses are jointly modeled with competing risks (multiple time to events). Our shared parameter joint model consists of a system of multiphase non-linear mixed effects sub-models for the multiple longitudinal responses, and a system of cause-specific non-proportional hazards frailty sub-models for competing risks, with associations among multiple longitudinal responses and competing risks modeled using latent parameters. The joint model is applied to a data set of patients who are on mechanical circulatory support and are awaiting heart transplant, using readily available software. While on the mechanical circulatory support, patient liver and renal functions may worsen and these in turn may influence one of the two possible competing outcomes: (i) death before transplant; (ii) transplant. In one application, we propose a system of multiphase cause-specific non-proportional hazard sub-model where frailty can be time varying. Performance under different scenarios was assessed using simulation studies. By using the proposed joint modeling of the multiphase sub-models, one can identify: (i) non-linear trends in multiple longitudinal outcomes; (ii) time-varying hazards and cumulative incidence functions of the competing risks; (iii) identify risk factors for the both types of outcomes, where the effect may or may not change with time; and (iv) assess the association between multiple longitudinal and competing risks outcomes, where the association may or may not change with time.     

Utilizing Cause-of-Death Information to Estimate Conditional Probabilities of Disease and Death

Conditional probabilities that do not require the assumption of independence among competing risks for identifiability are proposed for the analysis of carcinogenesis bioassay data as a reasonable adjustment for deaths or other removals due to competing risks. These conditional probabilities permit consideration of one type of tumor at a time, but in such a way that inferences are relevant to actual experimental conditions under which other diseases and causes of death are present and operating. The importance of assigning cause of death in bioassays is demonstrated by the fact that it allows the definition and identification of functions useful in the interpretation of carcinogenesis data, without requiring that a disease of interest be independent from competing risks. However, one proposed conditional probability does require sacrifice data for its identifiability.     

Competing Risks and Time‐Dependent Covariates

Time‐dependent covariates are frequently encountered in regression analysis for event history data and competing risks. They are often essential predictors, which cannot be substituted by time‐fixed covariates. This study briefly recalls the different types of time‐dependent covariates, as classified by Kalbfleisch and Prentice [The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, Wiley, New York, 2002] with the intent of clarifying their role and emphasizing the limitations in standard survival models and in the competing risks setting. If random (internal) time‐dependent covariates are to be included in the modeling process, then it is still possible to estimate cause‐specific hazards but prediction of the cumulative incidences and survival probabilities based on these is no longer feasible. This article aims at providing some possible strategies for dealing with these prediction problems. In a multi‐state framework, a first approach uses internal covariates to define additional (intermediate) transient states in the competing risks model. Another approach is to apply the landmark analysis as described by van Houwelingen [Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 2007, 34 , 70–85] in order to study cumulative incidences at different subintervals of the entire study period. The final strategy is to extend the competing risks model by considering all the possible combinations between internal covariate levels and cause‐specific events as final states. In all of those proposals, it is possible to estimate the changes/differences of the cumulative risks associated with simple internal covariates. An illustrative example based on bone marrow transplant data is presented in order to compare the different methods.     

Predation in multi-prey communities

We consider the effect of a top predator on the stability of a system of competing prey species. In the first instance, this is done in detail for two prey species where the predators either behave in a completely random way, interfere with each other or switch to the more abundant prey at any time. The analysis is then extended to the case of n similar prey species, either competing equally or competing with their two nearest neighbours in exploiting a one-dimensional resource spectrum. It is found that predator switching can produce local stability when the prey species overlap completely and even when the competition coefficients are greater than one. This, however, is more difficult to attain for nearest neighbour competition. In either case switching is advantageous to the predators, since it allows them to coexist successfully with their prey over a wider range of conditions.     

Competing risks analysis of correlated failure time data

Summary .   We develop methods for competing risks analysis when individual event times are correlated within clusters. Clustering arises naturally in clinical genetic studies and other settings. We develop a nonparametric estimator of cumulative incidence, and obtain robust pointwise standard errors that account for within-cluster correlation. We modify the two-sample Gray and Pepe–Mori tests for correlated competing risks data, and propose a simple two-sample test of the difference in cumulative incidence at a landmark time. In simulation studies, our estimators are asymptotically unbiased, and the modified test statistics control the type I error. The power of the respective two-sample tests is differentially sensitive to the degree of correlation; the optimal test depends on the alternative hypothesis of interest and the within-cluster correlation. For purposes of illustration, we apply our methods to a family-based prospective cohort study of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families. For women with BRCA1 mutations, we estimate the cumulative incidence of breast cancer in the presence of competing mortality from ovarian cancer, accounting for significant within-family correlation.     

A Bayesian multi-risks survival (MRS) model in the presence of double censorings

Semi-competing risks data include the time to a nonterminating event and the time to a terminating event, while competing risks data include the time to more than one terminating event. Our work is motivated by a prostate cancer study, which has one nonterminating event and two terminating events with both semi-competing risks and competing risks present as well as two censoring times. In this paper, we propose a new multi-risks survival (MRS) model for this type of data. In addition, the proposed MRS model can accommodate noninformative right-censoring times for nonterminating and terminating events. Properties of the proposed MRS model are examined in detail. Theoretical and empirical results show that the estimates of the cumulative incidence function for a nonterminating event may be biased if the information on a terminating event is ignored. A Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling algorithm is also developed. Our methodology is further assessed using simulations and also an analysis of the real data from a prostate cancer study. As a result, a prostate-specific antigen velocity greater than 2.0 ng/mL per year and higher biopsy Gleason scores are positively associated with a shorter time to death due to prostate cancer.     

Estimating Subject‐Specific Dependent Competing Risk Profile with Censored Event Time Observations

Summary In a longitudinal study, suppose that the primary endpoint is the time to a specific event. This response variable, however, may be censored by an independent censoring variable or by the occurrence of one of several dependent competing events. For each study subject, a set of baseline covariates is collected. The question is how to construct a reliable prediction rule for the future subject's profile of all competing risks of interest at a specific time point for risk‐benefit decision making. In this article, we propose a two‐stage procedure to make inferences about such subject‐specific profiles. For the first step, we use a parametric model to obtain a univariate risk index score system. We then estimate consistently the average competing risks for subjects who have the same parametric index score via a nonparametric function estimation procedure. We illustrate this new proposal with the data from a randomized clinical trial for evaluating the efficacy of a treatment for prostate cancer. The primary endpoint for this study was the time to prostate cancer death, but had two types of dependent competing events, one from cardiovascular death and the other from death of other causes.     

Cause‐Specific Cumulative Incidence Estimation and the Fine and Gray Model Under Both Left Truncation and Right Censoring

Summary The standard estimator for the cause‐specific cumulative incidence function in a competing risks setting with left truncated and/or right censored data can be written in two alternative forms. One is a weighted empirical cumulative distribution function and the other a product‐limit estimator. This equivalence suggests an alternative view of the analysis of time‐to‐event data with left truncation and right censoring: individuals who are still at risk or experienced an earlier competing event receive weights from the censoring and truncation mechanisms. As a consequence, inference on the cumulative scale can be performed using weighted versions of standard procedures. This holds for estimation of the cause‐specific cumulative incidence function as well as for estimation of the regression parameters in the Fine and Gray proportional subdistribution hazards model. We show that, with the appropriate filtration, a martingale property holds that allows deriving asymptotic results for the proportional subdistribution hazards model in the same way as for the standard Cox proportional hazards model. Estimation of the cause‐specific cumulative incidence function and regression on the subdistribution hazard can be performed using standard software for survival analysis if the software allows for inclusion of time‐dependent weights. We show the implementation in the R statistical package. The proportional subdistribution hazards model is used to investigate the effect of calendar period as a deterministic external time varying covariate, which can be seen as a special case of left truncation, on AIDS related and non‐AIDS related cumulative mortality.     

A comparison of anthropometric and training characteristics among recreational male ironman triathletes and ultra-endurance cyclists

"The physique of Ironman triathletes was considered to be similar to that of cyclists. We intended to investigate differences and similarities in anthropometry and training between 83 Ironman triathletes competing in a qualifier for 'Ironman Hawaii' and 84 ultra-endurance cyclists competing in a qualifier for the 'Race across America'. The anthropometric and training characteristics were compared between these two groups of athletes; associations of anthropometric and training characteristics with race time were investigated using bi- and multi-variate analysis. The Ironman triathletes had shorter legs, lower circumferences of upper arm, thigh and calf and a lower skeletal muscle mass compared to the ultra- cyclists. The Ironman triathletes invested more weekly training hours but fewer weekly cycling hours than the ultra-cyclists; the ultra-cyclists completed more cycling kilometres per week. In the multi- variate analysis, the skin-fold thicknesses at abdominal (P = 0.02) and iliacal site (P = 0.02) as well as percent body fat (P = 0.0008) were associated with race time for the Ironman triathletes. The abdominal (P = 0.003) and the iliacal (P = 0.02) skin-fold thicknesses, percent body fat (P = 0.001) and cycling speed during training (P = 0.01) were related to cycling split time in the Ironman race. For the ultra-cyclists, percent body fat (P = 0.04) was related to race time. We concluded that anthropometry and training of Ironman triathletes were different when compared to ultra-endurance cyclists."     

Composite Hazard Functions Reflecting Competing Latent Processes

A method for fitting parametric models to apparently complex hazard rates in survival data is suggested. Hazard complexity may indicate competing causes of failure. A competing risks model is constructed on the assumption that a failure time can be considered as the first passage time of possibly several latent, stochastic processes competing in reaching a barrier. An additional assumption of independence between the hidden processes leads directly to a composite hazard function as the sum of the cause specific hazards. We show how this composite hazard model based on Wiener processes can serve as a flexible tool for modelling complex hazards by varying the number of processes and their starting conditions. An example with real data is presented. Parameter estimation and model assessment are based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Meta-analysis of clinical trials with competing time-to-event endpoints

Recommendations for the analysis of competing risks in the context of randomized clinical trials are well established. Meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) is the gold standard for synthesizing evidence for clinical interpretation based on multiple studies. Surprisingly, no formal guidelines have been yet proposed to conduct an IPD meta-analysis with competing risk endpoints. To fill this gap, this work details (i) how to handle the heterogeneity between trials via a stratified regression model for competing risks and (ii) that the usual metrics of inconsistency to assess heterogeneity can readily be employed. Our proposal is illustrated by the re-analysis of a recently published meta-analysis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, aiming at quantifying the benefit of the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy on each competing endpoint.     

Dynamic clinical prediction models for discrete time‐to‐event data with competing risks—A case study on the OUTCOMEREA database

The development of clinical prediction models requires the selection of suitable predictor variables. Techniques to perform objective Bayesian variable selection in the linear model are well developed and have been extended to the generalized linear model setting as well as to the Cox proportional hazards model. Here, we consider discrete time‐to‐event data with competing risks and propose methodology to develop a clinical prediction model for the daily risk of acquiring a ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) attributed to P. aeruginosa (PA) in intensive care units. The competing events for a PA VAP are extubation, death, and VAP due to other bacteria. Baseline variables are potentially important to predict the outcome at the start of ventilation, but may lose some of their predictive power after a certain time. Therefore, we use a landmark approach for dynamic Bayesian variable selection where the set of relevant predictors depends on the time already spent at risk. We finally determine the direct impact of a variable on each competing event through cause‐specific variable selection.     

Robust Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Measurements and Competing Risks Failure Time Data

Existing methods for joint modeling of longitudinal measurements and survival data can be highly influenced by outliers in the longitudinal outcome. We propose a joint model for analysis of longitudinal measurements and competing risks failure time data which is robust in the presence of outlying longitudinal observations during follow‐up. Our model consists of a linear mixed effects sub‐model for the longitudinal outcome and a proportional cause‐specific hazards frailty sub‐model for the competing risks data, linked together by latent random effects. Instead of the usual normality assumption for measurement errors in the linear mixed effects sub‐model, we adopt a t ‐distribution which has a longer tail and thus is more robust to outliers. We derive an EM algorithm for the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters and estimate their standard errors using a profile likelihood method. The proposed method is evaluated by simulation studies and is applied to a scleroderma lung study (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Improved confidence intervals for a difference of two cause-specific cumulative incidence functions estimated in the presence of competing risks and random censoring

A cause-specific cumulative incidence function (CIF) is the probability of failure from a specific cause as a function of time. In randomized trials, a difference of cause-specific CIFs (treatment minus control) represents a treatment effect. Cause-specific CIF in each intervention arm can be estimated based on the usual non-parametric Aalen–Johansen estimator which generalizes the Kaplan–Meier estimator of CIF in the presence of competing risks. Under random censoring, asymptotically valid Wald-type confidence intervals (CIs) for a difference of cause-specific CIFs at a specific time point can be constructed using one of the published variance estimators. Unfortunately, these intervals can suffer from substantial under-coverage when the outcome of interest is a rare event, as may be the case for example in the analysis of uncommon adverse events. We propose two new approximate interval estimators for a difference of cause-specific CIFs estimated in the presence of competing risks and random censoring. Theoretical analysis and simulations indicate that the new interval estimators are superior to the Wald CIs in the sense of avoiding substantial under-coverage with rare events, while being equivalent to the Wald CIs asymptotically. In the absence of censoring, one of the two proposed interval estimators reduces to the well-known Agresti–Caffo CI for a difference of two binomial parameters. The new methods can be easily implemented with any software package producing point and variance estimates for the Aalen–Johansen estimator, as illustrated in a real data example.     

The application of nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabonomics to the dominant-submissive rat behavioral model

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods were used to study whether there are differences in the urine content between behaviorally distinct groups of rats: dominant and submissive. The dominant-submissive relationships (DSRs) were established in rat pairs competing for access to the feeder filled with sweetened milk. Dominant rats spend significantly longer amounts of time at the feeder than do their submissive partners. During a 2-week period, rats were tested for the DSR. At the end of the second week, behavioral groups of rats were selected and urine was collected during a 3.5-h time period. Principal component analysis revealed a metabolite from milk sugar, galactose, as a discriminating factor between rats classified as dominant and those classified as submissive. Measurements of galactose showed that the amount present in the urine correlated with the time spent in the feeder zone, thereby supporting the time criterion established for the DSR model.     

A computer program package for relative survival analysis

A computer program package has been constructed for use in patient survival analyses for chronic diseases based on aggregated data. The central concept of the analyses--the relative survival rate--is the ratio of the observed survival rate of the patients to the survival rate expected in a group in the general population similar to the group of patients at the beginning of the follow-up (interval), with respect to age, sex and calendar time. This quantity is used to measure patient survival adjusted for the effect of mortality attributable to the competing risks of death without employing information on causes of death of individual patients. The package contains three alternative methods of estimating the relative survival rates, two different ways of estimating the expectation of life for the patients, and five methods of testing the relative survival patterns using information on the whole follow-up period. Conventional survival and competing risk analysis can also be performed with the package. It is hoped that the package will facilitate standardization of statistical methodology and terminology in long-term survival studies for chronic diseases.     

On the equivalence of case-crossover and time series methods in environmental epidemiology

The case-crossover design was introduced in epidemiology 15 years ago as a method for studying the effects of a risk factor on a health event using only cases. The idea is to compare a case's exposure immediately prior to or during the case-defining event with that same person's exposure at otherwise similar "reference" times. An alternative approach to the analysis of daily exposure and case-only data is time series analysis. Here, log-linear regression models express the expected total number of events on each day as a function of the exposure level and potential confounding variables. In time series analyses of air pollution, smooth functions of time and weather are the main confounders. Time series and case-crossover methods are often viewed as competing methods. In this paper, we show that case-crossover using conditional logistic regression is a special case of time series analysis when there is a common exposure such as in air pollution studies. This equivalence provides computational convenience for case-crossover analyses and a better understanding of time series models. Time series log-linear regression accounts for overdispersion of the Poisson variance, while case-crossover analyses typically do not. This equivalence also permits model checking for case-crossover data using standard log-linear model diagnostics.     

Radiochemical neutron activation analysis in the life sciences

The contribution of radiochemical neutron activation analysis (RCNAA) to a better understanding of trace element analytics and physiology in the life sciences is outlined. Now, various non-nuclear powerful techniques for trace element analysis have become available, competing with RCNAA. This necessitates re-evaluation of the position of RCNAA, in particular versus inductively coupled plasmamass spectrometry (ICP-MS). On basis of the characteristic features of RCNAA and the capabilities of various competing non-nuclear analytical techniques, future niches for RCNAA in the analytical market are indicated. Presentation in memory of the late prof. Dr Jacques Versieck.     

A functional generalized F-test for signal detection with applications to event-related potentials significance analysis

Motivated by the analysis of complex dependent functional data such as event-related brain potentials (ERP), this paper considers a time-varying coefficient multivariate regression model with fixed-time covariates for testing global hypotheses about population mean curves. Based on a reduced-rank modeling of the time correlation of the stochastic process of pointwise test statistics, a functional generalized F-test is proposed and its asymptotic null distribution is derived. Our analytical results show that the proposed test is more powerful than functional analysis of variance testing methods and competing signal detection procedures for dependent data. Simulation studies confirm such power gain for data with patterns of dependence similar to those observed in ERPs. The new testing procedure is illustrated with an analysis of the ERP data from a study of neural correlates of impulse control.     

High-dimensional feature selection in competing risks modeling: A stable approach using a split-and-merge ensemble algorithm

Variable selection is critical in competing risks regression with high-dimensional data. Although penalized variable selection methods and other machine learning-based approaches have been developed, many of these methods often suffer from instability in practice. This paper proposes a novel method named Random Approximate Elastic Net (RAEN). Under the proportional subdistribution hazards model, RAEN provides a stable and generalizable solution to the large-p-small-n variable selection problem for competing risks data. Our general framework allows the proposed algorithm to be applicable to other time-to-event regression models, including competing risks quantile regression and accelerated failure time models. We show that variable selection and parameter estimation improved markedly using the new computationally intensive algorithm through extensive simulations. A user-friendly R package RAEN is developed for public use. We also apply our method to a cancer study to identify influential genes associated with the death or progression from bladder cancer.