DNA combing reveals intrinsic temporal disorder in the replication of yeast chromosome VI

It is generally believed that DNA replication in most eukaryotes proceeds according to a precise program in which there is a defined temporal order by which each chromosomal region is duplicated. However, the regularity of this program at the level of individual chromosomes, in terms of both the relative timing and the size of the DNA domain, has not been addressed. Here, the replication of chromosome VI from synchronized budding yeast was studied at a resolution of ∼ 1 kb with DNA combing and fluorescence microscopy. Contrary to what would be expected from cells following a rigorous temporal program, no two molecules exhibited the same replication pattern. Moreover, a direct evaluation of the extent to which the replication of distant chromosomal segments was coordinated indicates that the overwhelming majority of these segments were replicated independently. Importantly, averaging the patterns of all the fibers examined recapitulates the ensemble-averaged patterns obtained from population studies of the replication of chromosome VI. Thus, rather than an absolutely defined temporal order of replication, replication timing appears to be essentially probabilistic within individual cells, exhibiting only temporal tendencies within extended domains.     

Universal Temporal Profile of Replication Origin Activation in Eukaryotes

Although replication proteins are conserved among eukaryotes, the sequence requirements for replication initiation differ between species. In all species, however, replication origins fire asynchronously throughout S phase. The temporal program of origin firing is reproducible in cell populations but largely probabilistic at the single-cell level. The mechanisms and the significance of this program are unclear. Replication timing has been correlated with gene activity in metazoans but not in yeast. One potential role for a temporal regulation of origin firing is to minimize fluctuations in replication end time and avoid persistence of unreplicated DNA in mitosis. Here, we have extracted the population-averaged temporal profiles of replication initiation rates for S. cerevisiae, S. pombe, D. melanogaster, X. laevis and H. sapiens from genome-wide replication timing and DNA combing data. All the profiles have a strikingly similar shape, increasing during the first half of S phase then decreasing before its end. A previously proposed minimal model of stochastic initiation modulated by accumulation of a recyclable, limiting replication-fork factor and fork-promoted initiation of new origins, quantitatively described the observed profiles without requiring new implementations.The selective pressure for timely completion of genome replication and optimal usage of replication proteins that must be imported into the cell nucleus can explain the generic shape of the profiles. We have identified a universal behavior of eukaryotic replication initiation that transcends the mechanisms of origin specification. The population-averaged efficiency of replication origin usage changes during S phase in a strikingly similar manner in a highly diverse set of eukaryotes. The quantitative model previously proposed for origin activation in X. laevis can be generalized to explain this evolutionary conservation.     

Cell cycle timing and developmental checkpoints in Caulobacter crescentus

Development in Caulobacter reflects a level of complexity once thought only to exist in eukaryotic cells. The cell cycle and development are not isolated from each other, but are interdependent processes. Checkpoints are in place to ensure that both cell cycle and developmental processes are completed accurately before the next stage is initiated. The timing of these processes is regulated by signal transduction networks that integrate signals from DNA replication, cell division and development. These signal transduction networks achieve precise timing of the cell cycle and development by regulating temporal gene expression, and protein activity by dynamic spatial localization within the cell and timed proteolysis.     

Replication timing in a single human chromosome 11 transferred into the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line

DNA replication in eukaryotes initiates from discrete genomic regions, termed origins, according to a strict and often tissue-specific temporal program. However, the genetic program that controls activation of replication origins has still not been fully elucidated in mammalian cells. Previously, we measured replication timing at the sequence level along human chromosomes 11q and 21q. In the present study, we sought to obtain a greater understanding of the relationship between replication timing programs and human chromosomes by analysis of the timing of replication of a single human chromosome 11 that had been transferred into the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line by chromosome engineering. Timing of replication was compared for three 11q chromosomal regions in the transformed CHO cell line (CHO(h11)) and the original human fibroblast cell line, namely, the R/G-band boundary at 11q13.5/q14.1, the centromere and the distal telomere. We found that the pattern of replication timing in and around the R/G band boundary at 11q13.5/q14.1 was similar in CHO(h11) cells and fibroblasts. The 11q centromeric region, which replicates late in human fibroblasts, replicated in the second half of S phase in CHO(h11) cells. By contrast, however, the telomeric region at 11q25, which is late replicating in fibroblasts (and in several other human cell lines), replicated in the first half of S phase or in very early S phase in CHO(h11) cells. Our observations suggest that the replication timing programs of the R/G-band boundary and the centromeric region of human chromosome 11q are maintained in CHO(h11) cells, whereas that for the telomeric region is altered. The replication timing program of telomeric regions on human chromosomes might be regulated by specific mechanisms that differ from those for other chromosomal regions.     

Evidence for sequential and increasing activation of replication origins along replication timing gradients in the human genome

Genome-wide replication timing studies have suggested that mammalian chromosomes consist of megabase-scale domains of coordinated origin firing separated by large originless transition regions. Here, we report a quantitative genome-wide analysis of DNA replication kinetics in several human cell types that contradicts this view. DNA combing in HeLa cells sorted into four temporal compartments of S phase shows that replication origins are spaced at 40 kb intervals and fire as small clusters whose synchrony increases during S phase and that replication fork velocity (mean 0.7 kb/min, maximum 2.0 kb/min) remains constant and narrowly distributed through S phase. However, multi-scale analysis of a genome-wide replication timing profile shows a broad distribution of replication timing gradients with practically no regions larger than 100 kb replicating at less than 2 kb/min. Therefore, HeLa cells lack large regions of unidirectional fork progression. Temporal transition regions are replicated by sequential activation of origins at a rate that increases during S phase and replication timing gradients are set by the delay and the spacing between successive origin firings rather than by the velocity of single forks. Activation of internal origins in a specific temporal transition region is directly demonstrated by DNA combing of the IGH locus in HeLa cells. Analysis of published origin maps in HeLa cells and published replication timing and DNA combing data in several other cell types corroborate these findings, with the interesting exception of embryonic stem cells where regions of unidirectional fork progression seem more abundant. These results can be explained if origins fire independently of each other but under the control of long-range chromatin structure, or if replication forks progressing from early origins stimulate initiation in nearby unreplicated DNA. These findings shed a new light on the replication timing program of mammalian genomes and provide a general model for their replication kinetics.     

Dual control of replication timing. Stochastic onset but programmed completion of mammalian chromosome duplication.

In mammalian cells, DNA replication proceeds according to a precise temporal order during the S phase, but how this program is controlled remains poorly understood. We analyzed the replication-dependent bromodeoxyuridine banding of chromosomes in Chinese hamster cells treated with the spindle poison nocodazole. In these cells, nocodazole induces a transient mitotic arrest, followed by DNA re-replication without intervening cell division. Nuclear fragmentation is often observed in tetraploid derivatives, and previous studies suggest that replication timing of chromosomes could be affected when they are segregated into different micronuclei. Here we show that the onset of replication is frequently asynchronous on individual chromosomes during the re-replication process. Moreover, fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis revealed that replication synchrony is equally altered in fragmented and non-fragmented nuclei, indicating that asynchronous onset of replication is not dependent on physical separation of the chromosomes into isolated compartments. We also show that the ordered program of replication is always preserved along individual chromosomes. Our results demonstrate that the onset of replication of individual chromosomes in the same nuclear compartment can be uncoupled from the time of S-phase entry and from the programmed replication of chromosome sub-domains, revealing that multi-level controls contribute to establish replication timing in mammalian cells.     

Clusters,factories and domains

During S-phase of the cell cycle, chromosomal DNA is replicated according to a complex replication timing program, with megabase-sized domains replicating at different times. DNA fibre analysis reveals that clusters of adjacent replication origins fire near-synchronously. Analysis of replicating cells by light microscopy shows that DNA synthesis occurs in discrete foci or factories. The relationship between timing domains, origin clusters and replication foci is currently unclear. Recent work, using a hybrid Xenopus/hamster replication system, has shown that when CDK levels are manipulated during S-phase the activation of replication factories can be uncoupled from progression through the replication timing program. Here, we use data from this hybrid system to investigate potential relationships between timing domains, origin clusters and replication foci. We suggest that each timing domain typically comprises several replicon clusters, which are usually processed sequentially by replication factories. We discuss how replication might be regulated at different levels to create this complex organisation and the potential involvement of CDKs in this process.     

Epigenetic Control of Replication Origins

Efficient duplication of the eukaryotic genome requires the spatial and temporalcoordination of numerous replication origins on each chromosome. Epigenetic factors,like chromatin environment, can have profound effects on origin site selection, utilizationfrequency, and cell cycle firing time. Precisely how chromatin contributes to origin siteselection and timing is not completely understood. Recently, we reported on the cellcycle changes in chromatin structure at the plasmid replication origins of Epstein-BarrVirus (EBV) and Kaposi’s Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus (KSHV)1,2. These studiesand others suggest that cell cycle changes in histone modification and nucleosomeremodeling regulate pre-replication factor assembly and initiation of DNA replication atorigins. We discuss how these studies of viral origins may provide important insightsinto epigenetic control of cellular chromosome origins.     

The effect of Ku on telomere replication time is mediated by telomere length but is independent of histone tail acetylation

DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae proceeds according to a temporal program. We have investigated the role of the telomere-binding Ku complex in specifying late replication of telomere-proximal sequences. Genome-wide analysis shows that regions extending up to 80 kb from telomeres replicate abnormally early in a yku70 mutant. We find that Ku does not appear to regulate replication time by binding replication origins directly, nor is its effect on telomere replication timing mediated by histone tail acetylation. We show that Ku instead regulates replication timing through its effect on telomere length, because deletion of the telomerase regulator Pif1 largely reverses the short telomere defect of a yku70 mutant and simultaneously rescues its replication timing defect. Consistent with this conclusion, deleting the genome integrity component Elg1 partially rescued both length and replication timing of yku70 telomeres. Telomere length-mediated control of replication timing requires the TG(1-3) repeat-counting component Rif1, because a rif1 mutant replicates telomeric regions early, despite having extended TG(1-3) tracts. Overall, our results suggest that the effect of Ku on telomere replication timing results from its impact on TG(1-3) repeat length and support a model in which Rif1 measures telomere repeat length to ensure that telomere replication timing is correctly programmed.