Supernumerary proteins of mitochondrial ribosomes

Background

Messenger RNAs encoded by mitochondrial genomes are translated on mitochondrial ribosomes that have unique structure and protein composition compared to prokaryotic and cytoplasmic ribosomes. Mitochondrial ribosomes are a patchwork of core proteins that share homology with prokaryotic ribosomal proteins and new, supernumerary proteins that can be unique to different organisms. In mammals, there are specific supernumerary ribosomal proteins that are not present in other eukaryotes.

Scope of review

Here we discuss the roles of supernumerary proteins in the regulation of mitochondrial gene expression and compare them among different eukaryotic systems. Furthermore, we consider if differences in the structure and organization of mitochondrial genomes may have contributed to the acquisition of mitochondrial ribosomal proteins with new functions.

Major conclusions

The distinct and diverse compositions of mitochondrial ribosomes illustrate the high evolutionary divergence found between mitochondrial genetic systems.

General significance

Elucidating the role of the organism-specific supernumerary proteins may provide a window into the regulation of mitochondrial gene expression through evolution in response to distinct evolutionary paths taken by mitochondria in different organisms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Frontiers of Mitochondrial Research.     

Studies on proteins of animal ribosomes

Summary Total ribosomal protein from rat liver ribosomes can be separated into about 20 chief electrophoretic fractions by preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Ten electrophoretically homogeneous fractions have been isolated from the total mixture of ribosomal protein, respectively from proteins, prefractionated by CM-cellulose chromatography. Amino acid composition and molecular weights of some fractions have been determined. The amino acid composition of these fractions and of the total protein mixture are basically similar but there are also significant differences with regard to some amino acids. The molecular weights of the proteins studied are in the range between 7,000 and 29,000.     

Studies on proteins of animal ribosomes

Summary Ribosomes from different tissues and species of animals were tested by several different immunochemical methods. With antisera produced in rabbits by injection of intact ribosomes significant species differences in the antigenic properties of the ribosomes could be demonstrated whereas no tissue conditioned properties in the antigenic determinants were found. Abbreviations. RRL: ribosomes of rat liver; RBL: ribosomes of bovine liver; RBK: ribosomes of bovine kidney; anti-RRL: antiserum against RRL; anti-RBL: antiserum against RBL; anti-RBK: antiserum against RBK.     

The extraction of proteins from eukaryotic ribosomes and ribosomal subunits

Proteins were extracted from rat liver ribosomes and ribosomal subunits: with 67% acetic acid (in the presence of 3.3 mM, 33 mM, or 67 mM Mg) with 2 M LiCL in 4 M urea; with 0.25 N HCI; with 1% SDS; and after RNase digestion. The most efficient extraction and the best recovery were either with acetic acid in the presence of 33 mM or 67 mM Mg, or with LiCI-urea. Protein extracted with acetic acid, LiCi-urea, or with HCI had little or no contamination with RNA. The ribosomal proteins were analyzed by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis: the proteins extracted with acetic acid were the most soluble in the sample gel solution; their electrophoretograms displayed the maximum number of spots and the smallest number of derivatives or altered proteins. Preparations of protein extracted with SDS or RNase were relatively insoluble in the sample gel solution, and proteins extracted with HCI showed a large number of derivatives. All things considered, the most satisfactory method for the extraction of protein from eukaryotic ribosomes is with 67% acetic acid in the presence of 33 mM MgCl2.     

The acidic proteins of eukaryotic ribosomes. A comparative study

The acidic proteins extracted by 0.4 M NH4Cl and 50% ethanol from ribosomes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, wheat germ, Artemia salina, Drosophila melanogaster, rat liver and rabbit reticulocytes have been studied comparatively in several structural and functional aspects. All the species studied have in the ribosome two strongly acidic proteins with pI values not greater than pH 4.5., which appear to be monophosphorylated in the case of S. cerevisiae, A.Salina, D. melanogaster and wheat germ. Rat liver proteins are multiphosphorylated, as possibly are those from reticulocytes. The molecular weight of these acidic proteins as determined by SDS electrophoresis ranges from around 13,500 to 17,000 and, except in the case of yeast, of which both proteins have the same molecular weight, the size of the two proteins in the other species differs by approx. 1,000-2,000. In general, the size of the proteins increases with the evolutionary position of the organism, as seems to be the case with the degree of phosphorylation. From an immunological point of view the ribosomal acid proteins of eukaryotic cells are partically related, since antisera against yeast protein cross-react with proteins from wheat germ, rat liver and reticulocytes. Bacterial proteins L7 and L12 are very weakly recognized by the anti-yeast sera. Anti-bacterial acidic proteins do not cross-react with any of the protein from the species studied. The proteins from all the species studied are functional equivalents and can reconstitute the activity of particles of S. cerevisiae deprived of their acidic proteins.     

Dissociation of ribosomes from oocytes of Xenopus laevis into active subparticles

Ribosomes from oocytes of Xenopus laevis possess low endogenous activity in vivo and in vitro, yet are readily stimulated by poly(U). The ease with which these ribosomes dissociate into active subparticles under conditions where polyribosomes and active monoribosomes are stable supports the view that the majority are unprogrammed.     

Biochemical research on oogenesis. Comparison between the proteins of the ribosomes and the proteins of the 42 S particles from small oocytes of Xenopus laevis

Previtellogenic oocytes of Xenopus laevis synthesize large amounts of 5 S RNA and transfer RNA, but very little, if any, 28 S and 18 S RNA. About half of the RNA of these oocytes is stored in nucleoprotein particles sedimenting at 42 S. These particles contain 5 S RNA, transfer RNA, and several proteins, the function of which remains so far unknown.The proteins of the 42 S particles were analyzed by two-dimensional electrophoresis on polyacrylamide gel. The resulting fingerprints displayed one major and two minor basic spots. None of these coincided with any of the 37 spots produced by the 60 S subunit of the ribosomes and with the 30 spots produced by the 40 S subunit. We conclude that no ribosomal component other than 5 S RNA is present in the 42 S particles.The fingerprints of 40 S and 60 S ribosomal proteins from X. laevis coincided almost completely with the corresponding fingerprints from the rat and the rabbit.     

Acidic proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomes.

Two dimensional gel electrophoresis of ribosomal proteins from $\text{Saccharomyces}\text{cerevisiae}$ reveals the presence of three spots in the region corresponding to proteins of high acidic character. Washing the ribosomes with 0.4 M NH₄Cl and 50% ethanol, followed by chromatography of the extracted proteins on DEAE-cellulose, indicated the presence of two fractions of acidic proteins; (A and Ax), having very similar molecular weights (12.000–13.000), but phosphorylated to different extents. Fractions A and Ax are immunologically distinct and their immunologic properties differ from acidic proteins found in $\text{Escherichia}\text{coli}$, rat liver, and $\text{Artemia}\text{salina}$ ribosomes.Protein A can be resolved into two bands by electrofocusing, and two dimensional gel electrophoresis. The two components correspond to proteins L44 and L45 according to the standard nomenclature. Proteins Ax seems to correspond to the spot that moves above and to the left of L44 and L45 and is at least three times more phosphorylated than these two proteins.