Photoreduction of the quinone pool in the bacterial photosynthetic membrane: identification of infrared marker bands for quinol formation

The photoreduction of the quinone (Q) pool in the photosynthetic membrane of the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides was investigated by steady-state and time-resolved Fourier transform infrared difference spectroscopy. The results are consistent with the existence of a homogeneous Q pool inside the chromatophore membrane, with a size of around 20 Q molecules per reaction center. IR marker bands for the quinone/quinol (Q/QH(2)) redox couple were recognized. QH(2) bands are identified at 1491, 1470, 1433 and 1388-1375 cm(-1). The 1491 cm(-1) band, which is sensitive to (1)H/(2)H exchange, is assigned to a C-C ring mode coupled to a C-OH mode. A feature at approximately 1743/1720 cm(-1) is tentatively related to a perturbation of the carbonyl modes of phospholipid head groups induced by QH(2) formation. Complex conformational changes of the protein in the amide I and II spectral ranges are also apparent during reduction and reoxidation of the Q pool.     

Energetics of quinone-dependent electron and proton transfers in Rhodobacter sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers

Proteins bind redox cofactors, modifying their electrochemistry and affinity by specific interactions of the binding site with each cofactor redox state. Photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides have three ubiquinone-binding sites, Q(A), and proximal and distal Q(B) sites. Ubiquinones, which can be doubly reduced and bind 2 protons, have 9 redox states. However, only Q and Q(-) are seen in the Q(A) site and Q, Q(-), and QH(2) in the proximal Q(B) site. The distal Q(B) function is uncertain. Multiple conformation continuum electrostatics (MCCE) was used to compare the ubiquinone electrochemical midpoints (E(m)) and pK(a) values at these three sites. At pH 7, the Q(A)/Q(A)(-) E(m) is -40 mV and proximal Q(B)/Q(B)(-) -10 mV in agreement with the experimental values (assuming a solution ubiquinone E(m) of -145 mV). Q(B) reduction requires changes in nearby residue protonation and SerL223 reorientation. The distal Q(B)/Q(B)(-) E(m) is a much more unfavorable -260 mV. Q(A) and proximal Q(B) sites generally stabilize species with a -1 charge, while the distal Q(B) site prefers binding neutral species. In each site, the dianion is destabilized because favorable interactions with the residues and backbone increase with charge (q), while the unfavorable loss of solvation energy increases with q(2). Therefore, proton binding before a second reduction, forming QH and then QH(-), is always preferred to forming the dianion (Q(-)(2)). The final product QH(2) is higher in energy at the proximal Q(B) site than in solution; therefore, it binds poorly, favoring release. In contrast, QH(2) binds more tightly than Q at the distal Q(B) site.     

The role of the quinone pool in the cyclic electron-transfer chain of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides A modified Q-cycle mechanism

(1) The role of the ubiquinone pool in the reactions of the cyclic electron-transfer chain has been investigated by observing the effects of reduction of the ubiquinone pool on the kinetics and extent of the cytochrome and electrochromic carotenoid absorbance changes following flash illumination. (2) In the presence of antimycin, flash-induced reduction of cytochrome b-561 is dependent on a coupled oxidation of ubiquinol. The ubiquinol oxidase site of the ubiquinol:cytochrome c₂ oxidoreductase catalyses a concerted reaction in which one electron is transferred to a high-potential chain containing cytochromes c₁ and c₂, the Rieske-type iron-sulfur center, and the reaction center primary donor, and a second electron is transferred to a low-potential chain containing cytochromes b-566 and b-561. (3) The rate of reduction of cytochrome b-561 in the presence of antimycin has been shown to reflect the rate of turnover of the ubiquinol oxidase site. This diagnostic feature has been used to measure the dependence of the kinetics of the site on the ubiquinol concentration. Over a limited range of concentration (0–3 mol ubiquinol/mol cytochrome b-561), the kinetics showed a second-order process, first order with respect to ubiquinol from the pool. At higher ubiquinol concentrations, other processes became rate determining, so that above approx. 25 mol ubiquinol/mol cytochrome b-561, no further increase in rate was seen. (4) The kinetics and extents of cytochrome b-561 reduction following a flash in the presence of antimycin, and of the antimycin-sensitive reduction of cytochrome c₁ and c₂, and the slow phase of the carotenoid change, have been measured as a function of redox potential over a wide range. The initial rate for all these processes increased on reduction of the suspension over the range between 180 and 100 mV (pH 7). The increase in rate occurred as the concentration of ubiquinol in the pool increased on reduction, and could be accounted for in terms of the increased rate of ubiquinol oxidation. It is not necessary to postulate the presence of a tightly bound quinone at this site with altered redox properties, as has been previously assumed. (5) The antimycin-sensitive reactions reflect the turnover of a second catalytic site of the complex, at which cytochrome b-561 ix oxidized in an electrogenic reaction. We propose that ubiquinone is reduced at this site with a mechanism similar to that of the two-electron gate of the reaction center. We suggest that antimycin binds at this site, and displaces the quinone species so that all reactions at the site are inhibited. (6) In coupled chromatophores, the turnover of the ubiquinone reductase site can be measured by the antimycin-sensitive slow phase of the electrochromic carotenoid change. At redox potentials higher than 180 mV, where the pool is completely oxidized, the maximal extent of the slow phase is half that at 140 mV, where the pool contains approx. 1 mol ubiquinone/mol cytochrome b-561 before the flash. At both potentials, cytochrome b-561 became completely reduced following one flash in the presence of antimycin. The results are interpreted as showing that at potentials higher than 180 mV, ubiquinol stoichiometric with cytochrome b-561 reaches the complex from the reaction center. The increased extent of the carotenoid change, when one extra ubiquinol is available in the pool, is interpreted as showing that the ubiquinol oxidase site turns over twice, and the ubiquinone reductase sites turns over once, for a complete turnover of the ubiquinol:cytochrome c₂ oxidoreductase complex, and the net oxidation of one ubiquinol/complex. (7) The antimycin-sensitive reduction of cytochrome c₁ and c₂ is shown to reflect the second turnover of the ubiquinol oxidase site. (8) We suggest that, in the presence of antimycin, the ubiquinol oxidase site reaches a quasi equilibrium with ubiquinol from the pool and the high- and low-potential chains, and that the equilibrium constant of the reaction catalysed constrains the site to the single turnover under most conditions. (9) The results are discussed in the context of a detailed mechanism. The modified Q-cycle proposed is described by physicochemical parameters which account well for the results reported.     

Fast oxidation of the primary electron acceptor under anaerobic conditions requires the organization of the photosynthetic chain of Rhodobacter sphaeroides in supercomplexes

The kinetics of reoxidation of the primary acceptor Q(a) has been followed by measuring the changes in the fluorescence yield induced by a series of saturating flashes in intact cells of Rhodobacter sphaeroides in anaerobic conditions. At 0 degrees C, about half of Q(a)(-) is reoxidized in about 200 ms while reoxidation of the remaining fraction is completed in several seconds to minutes. The fast phase is associated with the transfer of ubiquinone formed at site Q(o) of the cytochrome bc(1) complex while the slowest phase is associated with the diffusion of ubiquinone present in the membrane prior to the flash excitation. The biphasic kinetics of Q(a)(-) oxidation is interpreted assuming that the electron chain is organized in supercomplexes that associate two RCs and one cyt bc(1) complex, which allows a fast transfer of quinone formed at the level of cyt bc(1) complex to the RCs. In agreement with this model, the fast phase of Q(a)(-) reoxidation is inhibited by myxothiazol, a specific inhibitor of cyt bc(1). The PufX-deleted mutant displays only the slowest phase of Q(a)(-) oxidation; it is interpreted by the lack of supramolecular organization of the photosynthetic chain that leads to a larger average distance between cyt bc(1) and RCs.     

THE ROLE OF THE QUINONE POOL IN THE CYCLIC ELECTRON-TRANSFER CHAIN OF RHODOPSEUDOMONAS SPHAEROIDES: A MODIFIED Q-CYCLE MECHANISM

(1) The role of the ubiquinone pool in the reactions of the cyclic electron-transfer chain has been investigated by observing the effects of reduction of the ubiquinone pool on the kinetics and extent of the cytochrome and electrochromic carotenoid absorbance changes following flash illumination. (2) In the presence of antimycin, flash-induced reduction of cytochrome b-561 is dependent on a coupled oxidation of ubiquinol. The ubiquinol oxidase site of the ubiquinol:cytochrome c(2) oxidoreductase catalyses a concerted reaction in which one electron is transferred to a high-potential chain containing cytochromes c(1) and c(2), the Rieske-type iron-sulfur center, and the reaction center primary donor, and a second electron is transferred to a low-potential chain containing cytochromes b-566 and b-561. (3) The rate of reduction of cytochrome b-561 in the presence of antimycin has been shown to reflect the rate of turnover of the ubiquinol oxidase site. This diagnostic feature has been used to measure the dependence of the kinetics of the site on the ubiquinol concentration. Over a limited range of concentration (0-3 mol ubiquinol/mol cytochrome b-561), the kinetics showed a second-order process, first order with respect to ubiquinol from the pool. At higher ubiquinol concentrations, other processes became rate determining, so that above approx. 25 mol ubiquinol/mol cytochrome b-561, no further increase in rate was seen. (4) The kinetics and extents of cytochrome b-561 reduction following a flash in the presence of antimycin, and of the antimycin-sensitive reduction of cytochrome c(1) and c(2), and the slow phase of the carotenoid change, have been measured as a function of redox potential over a wide range. The initial rate for all these processes increased on reduction of the suspension over the range between 180 and 100 mV (pH 7). The increase in rate occurred as the concentration of ubiquinol in the pool increased on reduction, and could be accounted for in terms of the increased rate of ubiquinol oxidation. It is not necessary to postulate the presence of a tightly bound quinone at this site with altered redox properties, as has been previously assumed. (5) The antimycin-sensitive reactions reflect the turnover of a second catalytic site of the complex, at which cytochrome b-561 is oxidized in an electrogenic reaction. We propose that ubiquinone is reduced at this site with a mechanism similar to that of the two-electron gate of the reaction center. We suggest that antimycin binds at this site, and displaces the quinone species so that all reactions at the site are inhibited. (6) In coupled chromatophores, the turnover of the ubiquinone reductase site can be measured by the antimycin-sensitive slow phase of the electrochromic carotenoid change. At redox potentials higher than 180 mV, where the pool is completely oxidized, the maximal extent of the slow phase is half that at 140 mV, where the pool contains approx. 1 mol ubiquinone/mol cytochrome b-561 before the flash. At both potentials, cytochrome b-561 became completely reduced following one flash in the presence of antimycin. The results are interpreted as showing that at potentials higher than 180 mV, ubiquinol stoichiometric with cytochrome b-561 reaches the complex from the reaction center. The increased extent of the carotenoid change, when one extra ubiquinol is available in the pool, is interpreted as showing that the ubiquinol oxidase site turns over twice, and the ubiquinone reductase sites turns over once, for a complete turnover of the ubiquinol:cytochrome c(2) oxidoreductase complex, and the net oxidation of one ubiquinol/complex. (7) The antimycin-sensitive reduction of cytochrome c(1) and c(2) is shown to reflect the second turnover of the ubiquinol oxidase site. (8) We suggest that, in the presence of antimycin, the ubiquinol oxidase site reaches a quasi equilibrium with ubiquinol from the pool and the high- and low-potential chains, and that the equilibrium constant of the reaction catalysed constrains the site to the single turnover under most conditions. (9) The results are discussed in the context of a detailed mechanism. The modified Q-cycle proposed is described by physicochemical parameters which account well for the results reported.     

Cytochrome bc1 complex [2Fe-2S] cluster and its interaction with ubiquinone and ubihydroquinone at the Qo site: a double-occupancy Qo site model.

The ubiquinone complement of Rhodobacter capsulatus chromatophore membranes has been characterized by its isooctane solvent extractability and electrochemistry; we find that the main ubiquinone pool (Qpool) amounts to about 80% of the total ubiquinone and has an Em7 value close to 90 mV. To investigate the interactions of ubiquinone with the cyt bc1 complex, we have examined the distinctive EPR line shapes of the [2Fe-2S] cluster of the cyt bc1 complex when the Qpool-cyt bc1 complex interactions are modulated by changing the numbers of Q or QH2 present (by solvent extraction and reconstitution), by the exposure of the [2Fe-2S] to the Qpool in different redox states, by the presence of inhibitors specific for the Qo site (myxothiazol and stigmatellin) and Qi site (antimycin), and by site-specific mutations of side chains of the cyt b polypeptide (mutants F144L and F144G) previously identified as important for Qo site structure. Evidence suggests that the Qo site can accommodate two ubiquinone molecules. One (designated Qos) is bound relatively strongly and is second only to the ubiquinone of the QA site of the reaction center in its resistance to solvent extraction. In this strong interaction, the Qo site binds Q and QH2 with approximately equal affinities. Their bound states are distinguished by their effects on the [2Fe-2S] cluster spectral feature at gx at 1.783 (Q) and gx at 1.777 (QH2); titration of the line-shape change reveals an Em7 value of approximately 95 mV. The other molecule (Qow) is bound more weakly, in the same range as the ubiquinone of the QB site of the reaction center. Again, the affinities of the Q form (gx at 1.800) and QH2 form (gx at 1.777) are nearly equal, and the Em7 value measured is approximately 80 mV. These results are discussed in terms of earlier EPR analyses of the cyt bc1 complexes of other systems. A Qo site double-occupancy model is considered that builds on the previous model based on Qo site mutants [Robertson, D. E., Daldal, F.,& Dutton, P. L. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 11249-11260] and includes the recent suggestion that two of the [2F3-2S] cluster ligands of the R. capsulatus cyt bc1 complex are histidines [Gurbiel, R. J. Ohnishi, T., Robertson, D. E. Daldal, F., & Hoffman, B. M. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 11579-11584]. We speculate that the cyt bc1 complex complexes a full enzymatic turnover without necessary exchange of ubiquinone with the Qpool.     

A tightly bound quinone functions in the ubiquinone reaction sites of quinoprotein alcohol dehydrogenase of an acetic acid bacterium, Gluconobacter suboxydans

Quinoprotein alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) of acetic acid bacteria is a membrane-bound enzyme that functions as the primary dehydrogenase in the ethanol oxidase respiratory chain. It consists of three subunits and has a pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ) in the active site and four heme c moieties as electron transfer mediators. Of these, three heme c sites and a further site have been found to be involved in ubiquinone (Q) reduction and ubiquinol (QH2) oxidation respectively (Matsushita et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1409, 154-164 (1999)). In this study, it was found that ADH solubilized and purified with dodecyl maltoside, but not with Triton X-100, had a tightly bound Q, and thus two different ADHs, one having the tightly bound Q (Q-bound ADH) and Q-free ADH, could be obtained. The Q-binding sites of both the ADHs were characterized using specific inhibitors, a substituted phenol PC16 (a Q analog inhibitor) and antimycin A. Based on the inhibition kinetics of Q2 reductase and ubiquinol-2 (Q2H2) oxidase activities, it was suggested that there are one and two PC16-binding sites in Q-bound ADH and Q-free ADH respectively. On the other hand, with antimycin A, only one binding site was found for Q2 reductase and Q2H2 oxidase activities, irrespective of the presence of bound Q. These results suggest that ADH has a high-affinity Q binding site (QH) besides low-affinity Q reduction and QH2 oxidation sites, and that the bound Q in the QH site is involved in the electron transfer between heme c moieties and bulk Q or QH2 in the low-affinity sites.     

Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy shows coupling of GLu-L212 protonation and electron transfer to Q(B) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy was used to investigate the electron transfer reaction Q(A-)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(B-) (k(AB)(1)) in mutant reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, where Asp-L210 and/or Asp-M17 have been replaced with Asn. Mutation of both residues decreases drastically k(AB)(1)), attributed to slow proton transfer to Glu-L212, which becomes rate limiting for electron transfer to Q(B) [M.L. Paddock et al., Biochemistry 40 (2001) 6893]. In the double mutant, the FTIR difference spectrum recorded during the time window 4-29 ms following a flash showed peaks at 1670 (-), 1601 (-) and 1467 (+) cm(-1), characteristic of Q(A) reduction. The time evolution of the spectra shows reoxidation of Q(A-) and concomitant reduction of Q(B) with a kinetics of about 40 ms. In native reaction centers and in both single mutants, formation of Q(B-) occurs much faster than in the double mutant. Within the time resolution of the technique, protonation of Glu-L212, as characterized by an absorption increase at 1728 cm(-1) [E. Nabedryk et al., Biochemistry 34 (1995) 14722], was found to proceed with the same kinetics as reduction of Q(B) in all samples. These rapid-scan FTIR results support the model of proton uptake being rate limiting for the first electron transfer from Q(A-) to Q(B) and the identification of Glu-L212 as the main proton acceptor in the state Q(A)Q(B-).     

Ubiquinone at center N is responsible for triphasic reduction of cytochrome b in the cytochrome bc(1) complex.

We have examined the pre-steady state reduction kinetics of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytochrome bc(1) complex by menaquinol in the presence and absence of endogenous ubiquinone to elucidate the mechanism of triphasic cytochrome b reduction. With cytochrome bc(1) complex from wild type yeast, cytochrome b reduction was triphasic, consisting of a rapid partial reduction phase, an apparent partial reoxidation phase, and a slow rereduction phase. Absorbance spectra taken by rapid scanning spectroscopy at 1-ms intervals before, during, and after the apparent reoxidation phase showed that this was caused by a bona fide reoxidation of cytochrome b and not by any negative spectral contribution from cytochrome c(1). With cytochrome bc(1) complex from a yeast mutant that cannot synthesize ubiquinone, cytochrome b reduction by either menaquinol or ubiquinol was rapid and monophasic. Addition of ubiquinone restored triphasic cytochrome b reduction, and the duration of the reoxidation phase increased as the ubiquinone concentration increased. When reduction of the cytochrome bc(1) complex through center P was blocked, cytochrome b reduction through center N was biphasic and was slowed by the addition of exogenous ubiquinone. These results show that ubiquinone residing at center N in the oxidized cytochrome bc(1) complex is responsible for the triphasic reduction of cytochrome b.     

Mutants of ubiquinol-cytochrome c2 oxidoreductase resistant to Qo site inhibitors: consequences for ubiquinone and ubiquinol affinity and catalysis

Seven single-site mutants in six residues of the cyt b polypeptide of Rhodobacter capsulatus selected for resistance to the Qo site inhibitors stigmatellin, myxothiazol, or mucidin [Daldal, F., Tokito, M.K., Davidson, E., & Faham, M. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 3951-3961] have been characterized by using optical and EPR spectroscopy and single-turnover kinetic analysis. The strains were compared with wild-type strain MT1131 and with the Ps- strain R126 (G158D), which is dysfunctional in its Qo site [Robertson, D.E., Davidson, E., Prince, R.C., van den Berg, W.H., Marrs, B.L., & Dutton, P.L. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 584-591]. Mutants selected for stigmatellin resistance induced a weakening in the binding of the inhibitor without discernible loss of ubiquinone(Q)/ubiquinol(QH2) binding affinity to the Qo site or kinetic impairment to catalysis. Mutants selected for myxothiazol or mucidin resistance, inducing weakening of inhibitor binding, all displayed impaired rates of Qo site catalysis: The most severe cases (F144L, F144S) displayed loss of affinity for Q, and evidence suggests that parallel loss of affinity for the substrate QH2 was incurred in these strains. The results provide a view of the nature of the interaction of Q and QH2 of the Qpool with the Qo site. Consideration of the mutational substitutions and their structural positions along with comparisons with the QA and QB sites of the photosynthetic reaction center suggests a model for the structure of the Qo site.     

Proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Blastochloris viridis

Photosynthetic reaction centers of Blastochloris viridis require two quanta of light to catalyse a two-step reduction of their secondary ubiquinone Q(B) to ubiquinol. We employed capacitive potentiometry to follow the voltage changes that were caused by the accompanying transmembrane proton displacements. At pH 7.5 and 20 degrees C, the Q(B)-related voltage generation after the first flash was contributed by a fast, temperature-independent component with a time constant of approximately 30 micros and a slower component of approximately 200 micros with activation energy (E(a)) of 50 kJ/mol. The kinetics after the second flash featured temperature-independent components of 5 micros and 200 micros followed by a component of 600 micros with E(a) approximately 60 kJ/mol.     

Three Redox States of Trypanosoma brucei Alternative Oxidase Identified by Infrared Spectroscopy and Electrochemistry

Electrochemistry coupled with Fourier transform infrared (IR) spectroscopy was used to investigate the redox properties of recombinant alternative ubiquinol oxidase from Trypanosoma brucei, the organism responsible for African sleeping sickness. Stepwise reduction of the fully oxidized resting state of recombinant alternative ubiquinol oxidase revealed two distinct IR redox difference spectra. The first of these, signal 1, titrates in the reductive direction as an n = 2 Nernstian component with an apparent midpoint potential of 80 mV at pH 7.0. However, reoxidation of signal 1 in the same potential range under anaerobic conditions did not occur and only began with potentials in excess of 500 mV. Reoxidation by introduction of oxygen was also unsuccessful. Signal 1 contained clear features that can be assigned to protonation of at least one carboxylate group, further perturbations of carboxylic and histidine residues, bound ubiquinone, and a negative band at 1554 cm⁻¹ that might arise from a radical in the fully oxidized protein. A second distinct IR redox difference spectrum, signal 2, appeared more slowly once signal 1 had been reduced. This component could be reoxidized with potentials above 100 mV. In addition, when both signals 1 and 2 were reduced, introduction of oxygen caused rapid oxidation of both components. These data are interpreted in terms of the possible active site structure and mechanism of oxygen reduction to water.     

Evidence for two sites of superoxide production by mitochondrial NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I)

Complex I (NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase) can form superoxide during forward electron flow (NADH-oxidizing) or, at sufficiently high protonmotive force, during reverse electron transport from the ubiquinone (Q) pool (NAD(+)-reducing). We designed an assay system to allow titration of the redox state of the superoxide-generating site during reverse electron transport in rat skeletal muscle mitochondria: a protonmotive force generated by ATP hydrolysis, succinate:malonate to alter electron supply and modulate the redox state of the Q pool, and inhibition of complex III to prevent QH(2) oxidation via the Q cycle. Stepwise oxidation of the QH(2)/Q pool by increasing malonate concentration slowed the rates of both reverse electron transport and rotenone-sensitive superoxide production by complex I. However, the superoxide production rate was not uniquely related to the resultant potential of the NADH/NAD(+) redox couple. Thus, there is a superoxide producer during reverse electron transport at complex I that responds to Q pool redox state and is not in equilibrium with the NAD reduction state. In contrast, superoxide production during forward electron transport in the presence of rotenone was uniquely related to NAD redox state. These results support a two-site model of complex I superoxide production; one site in equilibrium with the NAD pool, presumably the flavin of the FMN moiety (site I(F)) and the other dependent not only on NAD redox state, but also on protonmotive force and the reduction state of the Q pool, presumably a semiquinone in the Q-binding site (site I(Q)).     

Protonmotive pathways and mechanisms in the cytochrome bc1 complex

The cytochrome bc(1) complex catalyzes electron transfer from ubiquinol to cytochrome c by a protonmotive Q cycle mechanism in which electron transfer is linked to proton translocation across the inner mitochondrial membrane. In the Q cycle mechanism proton translocation is the net result of topographically segregated reduction of quinone and reoxidation of quinol on opposite sides of the membrane, with protons being carried across the membrane as hydrogens on the quinol. The linkage of proton chemistry to electron transfer during quinol oxidation and quinone reduction requires pathways for moving protons to and from the aqueous phase and the hydrophobic environment in which the quinol and quinone redox reactions occur. Crystal structures of the mitochondrial cytochrome bc(1) complexes in various conformations allow insight into possible proton conduction pathways. In this review we discuss pathways for proton conduction linked to ubiquinone redox reactions with particular reference to recently determined structures of the yeast bc(1) complex.     

Nonoxidizable ubiquinol derivatives that are suitable for the study of the ubiquinol oxidation site in the cytochrome bc1 complex

Recent X-ray crystallographic analyses of the mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex show ubiquinone binding at the Q(i) site, but attempts to show binding of ubiquinol or ubiquinone at the Q(o) site have been unsuccessful, even though the binding of noncompetitive Q(o) site inhibitors near the putative ubiquinol binding pocket is well established. We speculate that ubiquinol binds transiently to the Q(o) site only when both heme b(L) and the iron sulfur cluster are in the oxidized form, an experimental condition difficult to obtain since ubiquinol will be oxidized once bound to the site. Stable binding at the Q(o) site might be achieved by a nonoxidizable ubiquinol-like compound. For this purpose, the isomers 2,3,4-trimethoxy-5-decyl-6-methyl-phenol (TMDMP) and 2,3,4-trimethoxy-5-methyl-6-decyl-phenol (TMMDP) were synthesized from 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-decyl-1, 4-benzoquinol (Q0C10) by controlled methylation and separated by TLC and HPLC. The structures of TMDMP and TMMDP were established by 1H-13C-two-dimensional NMR. Both are competitive inhibitors of the cytochrome bc1 complex, with TMDMP being the stronger one. Preliminary results suggest that TMDMP binds tightly enough to make X-ray crystallography of inhibitor-bc1 complex co-crystals feasible. The binding site of TMDMP does not overlap with the binding sites of stigmatellin, MOA-stilbene (MOAS), undecylhydroxydioxobenzothiazole (UHDBT) and myxothaizol.     

How rapid are the internal reactions of the ubiquinol:cytochrome c 2 oxidoreductase?

The temperature dependence of the partial reactions leading to turn-over of the UQH₂:cyt c ₂ oxidoreductase of Rhodobacter sphaeroides have been studied. The redox properties of the cytochrome components show a weak temperature dependence over the range 280–330 K, with coefficients of about 1 m V per degree; our results suggest that the other components show similar dependencies, so that no significant change in the gradient of standard free-energy between components occurs over this temperature range. The rates of the reactions of the high potential chain (the Rieske iron sulfur center, cytochromes c ₁ and c ₂, reaction center primary donor) show a weak temperature dependence, indicating an activation energy < 8 kJ per mole for electron transfer in this chain. The oxidation of ubiquinol at the Q_z-site of the complex showed a strong temperature dependence, with an activation energy of about 32 kJ mole^–1. The electron transfer from cytochrome b-566 to cytochrome b-561 was not rate determining at any temperature, and did not contribute to the energy barrier. The activation energy of 32 kJ mole^–1 for quinol oxidation was the same for all states of the quinone pool (fully oxidized, partially reduced, or fully reduced before the flash). We suggest that the activation barrier is in the reaction by which ubiquinol at the catalytic site is oxidized to semiquinone. The most economical scheme for this reaction would have the semiquinone intermediate at the energy level indicated by the activation barrier. We discuss the plausibility of this simple model, and the values for rate constants, stability constant, the redox potentials of the intermediate couples, and the binding constant for the semiquinone, which are pertinent to the mechanism of the ubiquinol oxidizing site.Abbreviations (BChl)₂ P870, primary donor of the photochemical reaction center - b/c ₁ complex ubiquinol: cytochrome c ₂ oxidoreductase - cyt b _H cytochrome b-561 or higher potential cytochrome b - cyt b _L cytochrome b-566, or low potential cytochrome b - cyt c ₁, cyt c ₂, cyt c _t cytochromes c ₁ and c ₂, and total cytochrome c (cyt c ₁ and cyt c ₂) - Fe.S Rieske-type iron sulfur center, Q - QH₂ ubiquinone, ubiquinol - Q_z, Q_zH₂, Q_z ^– ubiquinone, ubiquinol, and semiquinone anion of ubiquinone, bound at quinol oxidizing site - Q_z-site ubiquinol oxidizing site (also called Q_o-(outside) - Q_o (Oxidizing) - Q_P (Positive proton potential) site) - Q_c-site uubiquinone reductase site (also called the Q_i-(inside) - Q_R (Reducing), or - Q_N (Negative proton potential) site) - UHDBT 5-(n-undecyl)-6-hydroxy-4,7-dioxobenzothiazol     

Evidence for a concerted mechanism of ubiquinol oxidation by the cytochrome bc1 complex

To better understand the mechanism of divergent electron transfer from ubiquinol to the iron-sulfur protein and cytochrome b(L) within the cytochrome bc(1) complex, we have examined the effects of antimycin on the presteady state reduction kinetics of the bc(1) complex in the presence or absence of endogenous ubiquinone. When ubiquinone is present, antimycin slows the rate of cytochrome c(1) reduction by approximately 10-fold but had no effect upon the rate of cytochrome c(1) reduction in bc(1) complex lacking endogenous ubiquinone. In the absence of endogenous ubiquinone cytochrome c(1), reduction was slower than when ubiquinone was present and was similar to that in the presence of ubiquinone plus antimycin. These results indicate that the low potential redox components, cytochrome b(H) and b(L), exert negative control on the rate of reduction of cytochrome c(1) and the Rieske iron-sulfur protein at center P. If electrons cannot equilibrate from cytochrome b(H) and b(L) to ubiquinone, partial reduction of the low potential components slows reduction of the high potential components. We also examined the effects of decreasing the midpoint potential of the iron-sulfur protein on the rates of cytochrome b reduction. As the midpoint potential decreased, there was a parallel decrease in the rate of b reduction, demonstrating that the rate of b reduction is dependent upon the rate of ubiquinol oxidation by the iron-sulfur protein. Together these results indicate that ubiquinol oxidation is a concerted reaction in which both the low potential and high potential redox components control ubiquinol oxidation at center P, consistent with the protonmotive Q cycle mechanism.     

Reduction and protonation of the secondary quinone acceptor of Rhodobacter sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction center: kinetic model based on a comparison of wild-type chromatophores with mutants carrying Arg-->Ile substitution at sites 207 and 217 in the L-subunit

After the light-induced charge separation in the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the electron reaches, via the tightly bound ubiquinone QA, the loosely bound ubiquinone Q(B) After two subsequent flashes of light, Q(B) is reduced to ubiquinol Q(B)H2, with a semiquinone anion Q-(B) formed as an intermediate after the first flash. We studied Q(B)H2 formation in chromatophores from Rb. sphaeroides mutants that carried Arg-->Ile substitution at sites 207 and 217 in the L-subunit. While Arg-L207 is 17 A away from Q(B), Arg-L217 is closer (9 A) and contacts the Q(B)-binding pocket. From the pH dependence of the charge recombination in the RC after the first flash, we estimated deltaG(AB), the free energy difference between the Q-(A)Q(B) and Q(A)Q-(B) states, and pK212, the apparent pK of Glu-L212, a residue that is only 4 A away from Q(B). As expected, the replacement of positively charged arginines by neutral isoleucines destabilized the Q-(B) state in the L217RI mutant to a larger extent than in the L207RI one. Also as expected, pK212 increased by approximately 0.4 pH units in the L207RI mutant. The value of pK212 in the L217RI mutant decreased by 0.3 pH units, contrary to expectations. The rate of the Q-(A)Q-(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)H2 transition upon the second flash, as monitored by electrometry via the accompanying changes in the membrane potential, was two times faster in the L207RI mutant than in the wild-type, but remained essentially unchanged in the L217RI mutant. To rationalize these findings, we developed and analyzed a kinetic model of the Q-(A)Q-(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)H2 transition. The model properly described the available experimental data and provided a set of quantitative kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of the Q(B) turnover. The non-electrostatic, 'chemical' affinity of the QB site to protons proved to be as important for the attracting protons from the bulk, as the appropriate electrostatic potential. The mutation-caused changes in the chemical proton affinity could be estimated from the difference between the experimentally established pK2J2 shifts and the expected changes in the electrostatic potential at Glu-L212, calculable from the X-ray structure of the RC. Based on functional studies, structural data and kinetic modeling, we suggest a mechanistic scheme of the QB turnover. The detachment of the formed ubiquinol from its proximal position next to Glu-L212 is considered as the rate-limiting step of the reaction cycle.     

QH*- ubisemiquinone radical in the bo3-type ubiquinol oxidase studied by pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance and hyperfine sublevel correlation spectroscopy

The high-affinity QH ubiquinone-binding site in the bo(3) ubiquinol oxidase from Escherichia coli has been characterized by an investigation of the native ubiquinone radical anion QH(*-) by pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. One- and two-dimensional electron spin-echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) spectra reveal strong interactions of the unpaired electron of QH(*-) with a nitrogen nucleus from the surrounding protein matrix. From analysis of the experimental data, the (14)N nuclear quadrupolar parameters have been determined: kappa = e(2)qQ/4h = 0.93 MHz and eta = 0.50. This assignment is confirmed by hyperfine sublevel correlation (HYSCORE) spectroscopy. On the basis of a comparison of these data with those obtained previously for other membrane-protein bound semiquinone radicals and model systems, this nucleus is assigned to a protein backbone nitrogen. This result is discussed with regard to the location and potential function of QH in the enzyme.     

Electron acceptors of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers II. H+ binding coupled to secondary electron transfer in the quinone acceptor complex

The photoreduction of ubiquinone in the electron acceptor complex (Q₁Q₁₁) of photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides, R26, was studied in a series of short, saturating flashes. The specific involvement of H⁺ in the reduction was revealed by the pH dependence of the electron transfer events and by net H⁺ binding during the formation of ubiquinol, which requires two turnovers of the photochemical act. On the first flash Q₁₁ receives an electron via Q₁ to form a stable ubisemiquinone anion (Q?^?₁₁); the second flash generates Q?^?₁. At low pH the two semiquinones rapidly disproportionate with the uptake of 2 H⁺, to produce Q₁₁H₂. This yields out-of-phase binary oscillations for the formation of anionic semiquinone and for H⁺ uptake. Above pH 6 there is a progressive increase in H⁺ binding on the first flash and an equivalent decrease in binding on the second flash until, at about pH 9.5, the extent of H⁺ binding is the same on all flashes. The semiquinone oscillations, however, are undiminished up to pH 9. It is suggested that a non-chromophoric, acid-base group undergoes a pK shift in response to the appearance of the anionic semiquinone and that this group is the site of protonation on the first flash. The acid-base group, which may be in the reaction center protein, appears to be subsequently involved in the protonation events leading to fully reduced ubiquinol. The other proton in the two electron reduction of ubiquinone is always taken up on the second flash and is bound directly to Q?^?₁₁. At pH values above 8.0, it is rate limiting for the disproportionation and the kinetics, which are diffusion controlled, are properly responsive to the prevailing pH. Below pH 8, however, a further step in the reaction mechanism was shown to be rate limiting for both H⁺ binding electron transfer following the second flash.