Sequence comparisons of odorant receptors among tortricid moths reveal different rates of molecular evolution among family members

In insects, odorant receptors detect volatile cues involved in behaviours such as mate recognition, food location and oviposition. We have investigated the evolution of three odorant receptors from five species within the moth genera Ctenopseustis and Planotrotrix, family Tortricidae, which fall into distinct clades within the odorant receptor multigene family. One receptor is the orthologue of the co-receptor Or83b, now known as Orco (OR2), and encodes the obligate ion channel subunit of the receptor complex. In comparison, the other two receptors, OR1 and OR3, are ligand-binding receptor subunits, activated by volatile compounds produced by plants--methyl salicylate and citral, respectively. Rates of sequence evolution at non-synonymous sites were significantly higher in OR1 compared with OR2 and OR3. Within the dataset OR1 contains 109 variable amino acid positions that are distributed evenly across the entire protein including transmembrane helices, loop regions and termini, while OR2 and OR3 contain 18 and 16 variable sites, respectively. OR2 shows a high level of amino acid conservation as expected due to its essential role in odour detection; however we found unexpected differences in the rate of evolution between two ligand-binding odorant receptors, OR1 and OR3. OR3 shows high sequence conservation suggestive of a conserved role in odour reception, whereas the higher rate of evolution observed in OR1, particularly at non-synonymous sites, may be suggestive of relaxed constraint, perhaps associated with the loss of an ancestral role in sex pheromone reception.     

A Conserved Aspartic Acid Is Important for Agonist (VUAA1) and Odorant/Tuning Receptor-Dependent Activation of the Insect Odorant Co-Receptor (Orco)

Insect odorant receptors function as heteromeric odorant-gated cation channels comprising a conventional odorant-sensitive tuning receptor, and a conserved co-receptor (Orco). An Orco agonist, VUAA1, is able to activate both heteromeric and homomeric Orco-containing channels. Very little is known about specific residues in Orco that contribute to cation permeability and gating. We investigated the importance of two conserved Asp residues, one in each of transmembrane domains 5 and 7, for channel function by mutagenesis. Drosophila melanogaster Orco and its substitution mutants were expressed in HEK cells and VUAA1-stimulated channel activity was determined by Ca²⁺ influx and whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology. Substitution of D466 in transmembrane 7 with amino acids other than glutamic acid resulted in a substantial reduction in channel activity. The D466E Orco substitution mutant was ∼2 times more sensitive to VUAA1. The permeability of the D466E Orco mutant to cations was unchanged relative to wild-type Orco. When D466E Orco is co-expressed with a conventional tuning odorant receptor, the heteromeric complex also shows increased sensitivity to an odorant. Thus, the effect of the D466E mutation is not specific to VUAA1 agonism or dependent on homomeric Orco assembly. We suggest the gain-of-activation characteristic of the D466E mutant identifies an amino acid that is likely to be important for activation of both heteromeric and homomeric insect odorant receptor channels.     

昆虫非典型嗅觉受体Orco的功能和分子结构研究进展

嗅觉受体是参与昆虫嗅觉识别过程的一类重要蛋白。在昆虫的众多嗅觉受体中, 有一类受体明显不同于其他受体, 被称为Orco。该受体基因在不同昆虫种间高度保守, 且表达广泛。Orco在昆虫嗅觉识别过程中发挥关键作用。采用基因突变或RNAi等技术使Orco基因沉默后, 昆虫会出现严重的嗅觉缺陷, 但Orco本身不与气味配体结合, 它与传统嗅觉受体形成复合体Or-Orco, 促进传统嗅觉受体在神经元树突膜上的定位并维持其稳定性, 提高传统嗅觉受体对气味反应的效率。昆虫嗅觉受体的结构与脊椎动物的G蛋白偶联受体相似, 均有7个跨膜区, 但二者的膜拓扑结构相反, 昆虫嗅觉受体的N末端位于细胞质膜内, C末端在细胞质膜外, Orco与传统嗅觉受体通过保守的C末端区域相互作用形成一种新型的配体门控离子通道--Or-Orco复合体。阐明Orco在昆虫嗅觉识别中的功能机制, 可为开创基于昆虫嗅觉行为干扰的新的害虫防治措施提供基础。     

The mouse eugenol odorant receptor: structural and functional plasticity of a broadly tuned odorant binding pocket

Molecular interactions of odorants with their olfactory receptors (ORs) are of central importance for the ability of the mammalian olfactory system to detect and discriminate a vast variety of odors with a limited set of receptors. How a particular OR binds and distinguishes different odorant molecules remains largely unknown on a structural basis. Here we investigated this question for the mouse eugenol receptor (mOR-EG). By screening a large odorant library, we discovered a wide range of chemical structures activating the receptor in heterologous mammalian cells. Potent agonists comprise (i) benzene, (ii) cyclohexane, or (iii) polycyclic structures substituted with alcohol, aldehyde, keto, ether, or esterified carboxylic groups. To detect those amino acids within the receptor that are in contact with a particular bound odorant molecule, we investigated how distinct mOR-EG point mutants were activated by the different odorant agonists found for the wild-type receptor. We identified 11 amino acids as a part of the receptor's ligand binding pocket. Molecular modeling predicted 10 of these residues in transmembrane helices TM3-TM6 and one in the extracellular loop between TM2 and TM3. These amino acids participate in odorant binding with variable importance depending on the type of odorant, revealing functional "fingerprints" of ligand-receptor interactions.     

Mutational Analysis of Cysteine Residues of the Insect Odorant Co-receptor (Orco) from Drosophila melanogaster Reveals Differential Effects on Agonist- and Odorant-tuning Receptor-dependent Activation

Insect odorant receptors are heteromeric odorant-gated cation channels comprising a conventional odorant-sensitive tuning receptor (ORx) and a highly conserved co-receptor known as Orco. Orco is found only in insects, and very little is known about its structure and the mechanism leading to channel activation. In the absence of an ORx, Orco forms homomeric channels that can be activated by a synthetic agonist, VUAA1. Drosophila melanogaster Orco (DmelOrco) contains eight cysteine amino acid residues, six of which are highly conserved. In this study, we replaced individual cysteine residues with serine or alanine and expressed Orco mutants in Flp-In 293 T-Rex cells. Changes in intracellular Ca²⁺ levels were used to determine responses to VUAA1. Replacement of two cysteines (Cys-429 and Cys-449) in a predicted intracellular loop (ICL3), individually or together, gave variants that all showed similar increases in the rate of response and sensitivity to VUAA1 compared with wild-type DmelOrco. Kinetic modeling indicated that the response of the Orco mutants to VUAA1 was faster than wild-type Orco. The enhanced sensitivity and faster response of the Cys mutants was confirmed by whole-cell voltage clamp electrophysiology. In contrast to the results from direct agonist activation of Orco, the two cysteine replacement mutants when co-expressed with a tuning receptor (DmelOR22a) showed an ∼10-fold decrease in potency for activation by 2-methyl hexanoate. Our work has shown that intracellular loop 3 is important for Orco channel activation. Importantly, this study also suggests differences in the structural requirements for the activation of homomeric and heteromeric Orco channel complexes.     

Subunit contributions to insect olfactory receptor function: channel block and odorant recognition

Insect olfactory receptors are heteromeric ligand-gated ion channels composed of at least one common subunit (Orco) and at least one subunit that confers odorant specificity. Little is known about how individual subunits contribute to the structure and function of the olfactory receptor complex. We expressed insect olfactory receptors in Xenopus oocytes to investigate 2 functional features, ion channel block and odorant recognition. The sensitivity of Drosophila olfactory receptors to inhibition by ruthenium red, a cation channel blocker, varied widely when different specificity subunits were present, suggesting that the specificity subunits contribute to the structure of the ion pore. Olfactory receptors formed by Dmel\Or35a and Orco subunits from several different species displayed highly similar odorant response profiles, suggesting that the Orco subunit does not contribute to the structure of the odorant-binding site. We further explored odorant recognition by conducting a detailed examination of the odorant specificity Dmel\Or67a + Dmel\Orco, a receptor that responds to aromatic structures. This screen identified agonists, partial agonists, and an antagonist of Dmel\Or67a + Dmel\Orco. Our findings favor specific subunit arrangements within the olfactory receptor complex and provide a preliminary odorophore for an olfactory receptor, offering a useful foundation for future exploration of insect olfactory receptor structure.     

Solution structure of the second extracellular loop of human thromboxane A2 receptor

Thromboxane A(2) receptor (TP receptor), a prostanoid receptor, belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor family, composed of three intracellular loops and three extracellular loops connecting seven transmembrane helices. The highly conserved extracellular domains of the prostanoid receptors were found in the second extracellular loop (eLP(2)), which was proposed to be involved in ligand recognition. The 3D structure of the eLP(2) would help to further explain the ligand binding mechanism. Analysis of the human TP receptor model generated from molecular modeling based on bacteriorhodopsin crystallographic structure indicated that about 12-14 A separates the N- and C-termini of the extra- and intracellular loops. Synthetic loop peptides whose termini are constrained to this separation are presumably more likely to mimic the native loop structure than the corresponding loop region peptide with unrestricted ends. To test this new concept, a peptide corresponding to the eLP(2) (residues 173-193) of the TP receptor has been made with the N- and C-termini connected by a homocysteine disulfide bond. Through 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments, complete (1)H NMR assignments, and structural construction, the overall 3D structure of the peptide was determined. The structure shows two beta-turns at residues 180 and 185. The distance between the N- and C-termini of the peptide shown in the NMR structure is 14.2 A, which matched the distance (14.5 A) between the two transmembrane helices connecting the eLP(2) in the TP receptor model. This suggests that the approach using the constrained loop peptides greatly increases the likelihood of solving the whole 3D structures of the extra- and the intracellular domains of the TP receptor. This approach may also be useful in structural studies of the extramembrane loops of other G protein-coupled receptors.     

Activation of transmembrane cell‐surface receptors via a common mechanism? The “rotation model”

It has long been thought that transmembrane cell‐surface receptors, such as receptor tyrosine kinases and cytokine receptors, among others, are activated by ligand binding through ligand‐induced dimerization of the receptors. However, there is growing evidence that prior to ligand binding, various transmembrane receptors have a preformed, yet inactive, dimeric structure on the cell surface. Various studies also demonstrate that during transmembrane signaling, ligand binding to the extracellular domain of receptor dimers induces a rotation of transmembrane domains, followed by rearrangement and/or activation of intracellular domains. The paper here describes transmembrane cell‐surface receptors that are known or proposed to exist in dimeric form prior to ligand binding, and discusses how these preformed dimers are activated by ligand binding.     

Complex chimeras to map ligand binding sites of GPCRs

Family 1a GPCRs are thought to bind small molecule ligands in a pocket comprising sequences from non-contiguous transmembrane helices. In this study, receptor-ligand binding determinants were defined by building a series of complex chimeras where multiple sequences were exchanged between related G-protein coupled receptors. Regions of P2Y(1), P2Y(2) and BLT(1) predicted to interact with nucleotide and leukotriene ligands were identified and receptors were engineered within their transmembrane helices to transpose the ligand binding site of one receptor on to another receptor. Ligand-induced activation of chimeras was compared with wild-type receptor activation in a yeast reporter gene assay. Binding of ligand to a P2Y(2)/BLT(1) chimera confirmed that the ligand binding determinants of BLT(1) are located in the upper regions of the helices and extracellular loops of this receptor and that they had been successfully transferred to a receptor that normally binds unrelated ligands.     

Membrane topology of the Drosophila OR83b odorant receptor

By analogy to mammals, odorant receptors (ORs) in insects, such as Drosophila melanogaster, have long been thought to belong to the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. However, recent work has cast doubt on this assumption and has tentatively suggested an inverted topology compared to the canonical N(out) - C(in) 7 transmembrane (TM) GPCR topology, at least for some Drosophila ORs. Here, we report a detailed topology mapping of the Drosophila OR83b receptor using engineered glycosylation sites as topology markers. Our results are inconsistent with a classical GPCR topology and show that OR83b has an intracellular N-terminus, an extracellular C-terminus, and 7TM helices.     

Phenylthiophenecarboxamide Antagonists of the Olfactory Receptor Co-Receptor Subunit from a Mosquito

Insects detect environmental chemicals using chemosensory receptors, such as the ORs, a family of odorant-gated ion channels. Insect ORs are multimeric complexes of unknown stoichiometry, formed by a common subunit (the odorant receptor co-receptor subunit, Orco) and one of many variable subunits that confer odorant specificity. The recent discovery of Orco directed ligands, including both agonists and antagonists, suggests Orco as a promising target for chemical control of insects. In addition to competitively inhibiting OR activation by Orco agonists, several Orco antagonists have been shown to act through a non-competitive mechanism to inhibit OR activation by odorants. We previously identified a series of Orco antagonists, including N-(4-ethylphenyl)-2-thiophenecarboxamide (OX1a, previously referred to as OLC20). Here, we explore the chemical space around the OX1a structure to identify more potent Orco antagonists. Cqui\Orco+Cqui\Or21, an OR from Culex quinquefasciatus (the Southern House Mosquito) that responds to 3-methylindole (skatole) and is thought to mediate oviposition behavior, was expressed in Xenopus oocytes and receptor function assayed by two-electrode voltage clamp electrophysiology. 22 structural analogs of OX1a were screened for antagonism of OR activation by an Orco agonist. By varying the moieties decorating the phenyl and thiophene rings, and altering the distance between the rings, we were able to identify antagonists with improved potency. Detailed examination of three of these compounds (N-mesityl-2-thiophenecarboxamide, N-(4-methylbenzyl)-2-thiophenecarboxamide and N-(2-ethylphenyl)-3-(2-thienyl)-2-propenamide) demonstrated competitive inhibition of receptor activation by an Orco agonist and non-competitive inhibition of receptor activation by an odorant. The ability to inhibit OR activation by odorants may be a general property of this class of Orco antagonist, suggesting that odorant mediated behaviors can be manipulated through Orco antagonism. The high conservation of Orco across insect species and previous demonstrations that various Orco ligands are active at ORs derived from several different insect orders suggests that Orco antagonists may have broad applicability.     

Comparative fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of metabotropic glutamate receptors: implications about the dimeric arrangement and rearrangement upon ligand bindings

Dimerization of G protein-coupled receptors has received much attention as a regulatory system of physiological function. Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are suitable models for studying the physiological significance of G protein-coupled receptor dimers because they form constitutive homodimers and function through dimeric rearrangement of their extracellular ligand binding domains. However, the molecular architecture of the transmembrane domains (TMDs) and their rearrangement upon agonist binding are still largely unknown. Here we show that the two helix Vs are arranged as the closest part in the dimeric TMDs and change their positions through synergistic control by the binding of two glutamates. The possibility that helix V is involved in an inter-protomer communication was first suggested by the finding that constitutively active mutation sites were identified on both sides of helix V. Then, comprehensive fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis using mGluRs whose cytoplasmic loops were labeled with donor and acceptor fluorescent proteins revealed that the third intracellular loop connecting helices V and VI of one protomer was in close proximity to the second and third intracellular loops of the other protomer and that all the intracellular loops became closer during the activation. Furthermore, FRET analysis of heterodimers in which only one protomer had ligand binding ability revealed the synergistic effect of the binding of two glutamates on the dimeric rearrangements of the TMD. Thus, the glutamate-dependent synergistic relocation of the helix Vs in the dimer is important for the signal flow from the extracellular ligand binding domain to the cytoplasmic surface of the mGluR.     

Gating mechanisms in Cys-loop receptors

The Cys-loop receptor superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels has a prominent role in neuronal signalling. These receptors are pentamers, each subunit containing ten β-strands in the extracellular domain and four α-helical transmembrane domains (M1–M4). The M2 domain of each subunit lines the intrinsic ion channel pore and residues within the extracellular domain form ligand binding sites. Ligand binding initiates a conformational change that opens the ion-selective pore. The coupling between ligand binding in the extracellular domain and opening of the intrinsic ion channel pore located in the membrane is not fully understood. Several loop structures, such as loop 2, the Cys-loop, the pre-M1 region and the M2–M3 loop have been implicated in receptor activation. The current “conformational change wave” hypothesis suggests that binding of a ligand initiates a rotation of the β-sheets around an axis that passes through the Cys-loop. Due to this rotation, the Cys-loop and loop 2 are displaced. Movement of the M2–M3 loop then twists the M2 domain leading to a separation of the helices and opening of the pore. The publication of a crystal structure of an acetylcholine binding protein and the refined structure of the Torpedo marmorata acetylcholine receptor have improved the understanding of the mechanisms and structures involved in coupling ligand binding to channel gating. In this review, the most recent findings on some of these loop structures will be reported and discussed in view of their role in the gating mechanism.     

Prediction of the odorant binding site of olfactory receptor proteins by human-mouse comparisons

Olfactory receptors (ORs) are a large family of proteins involved in the recognition and discrimination of numerous odorants. These receptors belong to the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) hyperfamily, for which little structural data are available. In this study we predict the binding site residues of OR proteins by analyzing a set of 1441 OR protein sequences from mouse and human. The central insight utilized is that functional contact residues would be conserved among pairs of orthologous receptors, but considerably less conserved among paralogous pairs. Using judiciously selected subsets of 218 ortholog pairs and 518 paralog pairs, we have identified 22 sequence positions that are both highly conserved among the putative orthologs and variable among paralogs. These residues are disposed on transmembrane helices 2 to 7, and on the second extracellular loop of the receptor. Strikingly, although the prediction makes no assumption about the location of the binding site, these amino acid positions are clustered around a pocket in a structural homology model of ORs, mostly facing the inner lumen. We propose that the identified positions constitute the odorant binding site. This conclusion is supported by the observation that all but one of the predicted binding site residues correspond to ligand-contact positions in other rhodopsin-like GPCRs.     

Modeling and docking of the three-dimensional structure of the human melanocortin 4 receptor

A three-dimensional structure of the human melanocortin 4 receptor (hMC4R) is constructed in this study using a computer-aided molecular modeling approach. Human melanocortin 4 receptor is a G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR). We structurally aligned transmembrane helices with bovine rhodopsin transmembrane domains, simulated both intracellular and extracellular loop domains on homologous loop regions in other proteins of known 3D structure and modeled the C terminus on the corresponding part of bovine rhodopsin. Then tandem minimization and dynamics calculations were run to refine the crude structure. The simulative model was tested by docking with a triplet peptide (RFF) ligand. It was found that the ligand is located among transmembrane regions TM3, TM4, TM5, and TM6 of hMC4R. In consistence with mutational and biochemical data, binding site is mainly formed as a hydrophobic and negatively charged pocket. The model constructed here might provide a structural framework for making rational predictions in relevant fields.     

The Odorant Receptor Co-Receptor from the Bed Bug,Cimex lectularius L

Recently, the bed bug, Cimex lectularius L. has re-emerged as a serious and growing problem in many parts of the world. Presence of resistant bed bugs and the difficulty to eliminate them has renewed interest in alternative control tactics. Similar to other haematophagous arthropods, bed bugs rely on their olfactory system to detect semiochemicals in the environment. Previous studies have morphologically characterized olfactory organs of bed bugs’ antenna and have physiologically evaluated the responses of olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) to host-derived chemicals. To date, odorant binding proteins (OBPs) and odorant receptors (ORs) associated with these olfaction processes have not been studied in bed bugs. Chemoreception in insects requires formation of heteromeric complexes of ORs and a universal OR coreceptor (Orco). Orco is the constant chain of every odorant receptor in insects and is critical for insect olfaction but does not directly bind to odorants. Orco agonists and antagonists have been suggested as high-value targets for the development of novel insect repellents. In this study, we have performed RNAseq of bed bug sensory organs and identified several odorant receptors as well as Orco. We characterized Orco expression and investigated the effect of chemicals targeting Orco on bed bug behavior and reproduction. We have identified partial cDNAs of six C. lectularius OBPs and 16 ORs. Full length bed bug Orco was cloned and sequenced. Orco is widely expressed in different parts of the bed bug including OR neurons and spermatozoa. Treatment of bed bugs with the agonist VUAA1 changed bed bug pheromone-induced aggregation behavior and inactivated spermatozoa. We have described and characterized for the first time OBPs, ORs and Orco in bed bugs. Given the importance of these molecules in chemoreception of this insect they are interesting targets for the development of novel insect behavior modifiers.     

Insect Odorant Response Sensitivity Is Tuned by Metabotropically Autoregulated Olfactory Receptors

Insects possess one of the most exquisitely sensitive olfactory systems in the animal kingdom, consisting of three different types of chemosensory receptors: ionotropic glutamate-like receptors (IRs), gustatory receptors (GRs) and odorant receptors (ORs). Both insect ORs and IRs are ligand-gated ion channels, but ORs possess a unique configuration composed of an odorant-specific protein OrX and a ubiquitous coreceptor (Orco). In addition, these two ionotropic receptors confer different tuning properties for the neurons in which they are expressed. Unlike IRs, neurons expressing ORs are more sensitive and can also be sensitized by sub-threshold concentrations of stimuli. What is the mechanistic basis for these differences in tuning? We show that intrinsic regulation of Orco enhances neuronal response to odorants and sensitizes the ORs. We also demonstrate that inhibition of metabotropic regulation prevents receptor sensitization. Our results indicate that Orco-mediated regulation of OR sensitivity provides tunable ionotropic receptors capable of detecting odors over a wider range of concentrations, providing broadened sensitivity over IRs themselves.     

The role of the coreceptor Orco in insect olfactory transduction

Insects sense odorants with specialized odorant receptors (ORs). Each antennal olfactory receptor neuron expresses one OR with an odorant binding site together with a conserved coreceptor called Orco which does not bind odorants. Orco is necessary for localization of ORs to dendritic membranes and, thus, is essential for odorant detection. It forms a spontaneously opening cation channel, activated via phosphorylation by protein kinase C. Thereafter, Orco is also activated via cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). Orco forms homo—as well as heteromers with ORs with unknown stoichiometry. Contradictory publications suggest different mechanisms of olfactory transduction. On the one hand, evidence accumulates for the employment of more than one G protein-coupled olfactory transduction cascade in different insects. On the other hand, results from other studies suggest that the OR–Orco complex functions as an odorant-gated cation channel mediating ionotropic signal transduction. This review analyzes conflicting hypotheses concerning the role of Orco in insect olfactory transduction. In conclusion, in situ studies in hawkmoths falsify the hypothesis that Orco underlies odorant-induced ionotropic signal transduction in all insect species. Instead, Orco forms a metabotropically gated, slow cation channel which controls odorant response threshold and kinetics of the sensory neuron.     

Static and dynamic roles of extracellular loops in G-protein-coupled receptors: a mechanism for sequential binding of thyrotropin-releasing hormone to its receptor.

Small ligands generally bind within the seven transmembrane-spanning helices of G-protein-coupled receptors, but their access to the binding pocket through the closely packed loops has not been elucidated. In this work, a model of the extracellular loops of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor (TRHR) was constructed, and molecular dynamics simulations and quasi-harmonic analysis have been performed to study the static and dynamic roles of the extracellular domain. The static analysis based on curvature and electrostatic potential on the surface of TRHR suggests the formation of an initial recognition site between TRH and the surface of its receptor. These results are supported by experimental evidence. A quasi-harmonic analysis of the vibrations of the extracellular loops suggest that the low-frequency motions of the loops will aid the ligand to access its transmembrane binding pocket. We suggest that all small ligands may bind sequentially to the transmembrane pocket by first interacting with the surface binding site and then may be guided into the transmembrane binding pocket by fluctuations in the extracellular loops.     

Ivermectin Interaction with transmembrane helices reveals widespread rearrangements during opening of P2X receptor channels

P2X receptors are trimeric cation channels that open in response to binding of extracellular ATP. Each subunit contains a large extracellular ligand binding domain and two flanking transmembrane (TM) helices that form the pore, but the extent of gating motions of the TM helices is unclear. We probed these motions using ivermectin (IVM), a macrocyclic lactone that stabilizes the open state of P2X(4) receptor channels. We find that IVM partitions into lipid membranes and that transfer of the TM regions of P2X(4) receptors is sufficient to convey sensitivity to the lactone, suggesting that IVM interacts most favorably with the open conformation of the two TM helices at the protein-lipid interface. Scanning mutagenesis of the two TMs identifies residues that change environment between closed and open states, and substitutions at a subset of these positions weaken IVM binding. The emerging patterns point to widespread rearrangements of the TM helices during opening of P2X receptor channels.