Uridylate addition and RNA ligation contribute to the specificity of kinetoplastid insertion RNA editing

RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei inserts and deletes uridylates (U's) in mitochondrial pre-mRNAs under the direction of guide RNAs (gRNAs). We report here the development of a novel in vitro precleaved editing assay and its use to study the gRNA specificity of the U addition and RNA ligation steps in insertion RNA editing. The 5' fragment of substrate RNA accumulated with the number of added U's specified by gRNA, and U addition products with more than the specified number of U's were rare. U addition up to the number specified occurred in the absence of ligation, but accumulation of U addition products was slowed. The 5' fragments with the correct number of added U's were preferentially ligated, apparently by adenylylated RNA ligase since exogenously added ATP was not required and since ligation was eliminated by treatment with pyrophosphate. gRNA-specified U addition was apparent in the absence of ligation when the pre-mRNA immediately upstream of the editing site was single stranded and more so when it was base paired with gRNA. These results suggest that both the U addition and RNA ligation steps contributed to the precision of RNA editing.     

RNA sequence and base pairing effects on insertion editing in Trypanosoma brucei

RNA editing inserts and deletes uridylates (U's) in kinetoplastid mitochondrial pre-mRNAs by a series of enzymatic steps. Small guide RNAs (gRNAs) specify the edited sequence. Editing, though sometimes extensive, is precise. The effects of mutating pre-mRNA and gRNA sequences in, around, and upstream of the editing site on the specificity and efficiency of in vitro insertion editing were examined. U's could be added opposite guiding pyrimidines, but guiding purines, particularly A's, were required for efficient ligation. A base pair between mRNA and gRNA immediately upstream of the editing site was not required for insertion editing, although it greatly enhanced its efficiency and accuracy. In addition, a gRNA/mRNA duplex upstream of the editing site enhanced insertion editing when it was close to the editing site, but prevented cleavage, and hence editing, when immediately adjacent to the editing site. Thus, several aspects of mRNA-gRNA interaction, as well as gRNA base pairing with added U's, optimize editing efficiency, although they are not required for insertion editing.     

Trypanosoma brucei guide RNA poly(U) tail formation is stabilized by cognate mRNA

Guide RNAs (gRNAs) are small RNAs that provide specificity for uridine addition and deletion during mRNA editing in trypanosomes. Terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) adds uridines to pre-mRNAs during RNA editing and adds a poly(U) tail to the 3' end of gRNAs. The poly(U) tail may stabilize the association of gRNAs with cognate mRNA during editing. Both TUTase and gRNAs associate with two ribonucleoprotein complexes, I (19S) and II (35S to 40S). Complex II is believed to be the fully assembled active editing complex, since it contains pre-edited mRNA and enzymes thought necessary for editing. Purification of TUTase from mitochondrial extracts resulted in the identification of two chromatographically distinct TUTase activities. Stable single-uridine addition to different substrate RNAs is performed by the 19S complex, despite the presence of a uridine-specific 3' exonuclease within this complex. Multiple uridines are added to substrate RNAs by a 10S particle that may be an unstable subunit of complex I lacking the uridine-specific 3' exonuclease. Multiple uridines could be stably added onto gRNAs by complex I when the cognate mRNA is present. We propose a model in which the purine-rich region of the cognate mRNA protects the uridine tail from a uridine exonuclease activity that is present within the complex. To test this model, we have mutated the purine-rich region of the pre-mRNA to abolish base-pairing interaction with the poly(U) tail of the gRNA. This RNA fails to protect the uridine tail of the gRNA from exoribonucleolytic trimming and is consistent with a role for the purine-rich region of the mRNA in gRNA maturation.     

Kinetoplastid RNA editing: in vitro formation of cytochrome b gRNA-mRNA chimeras from synthetic substrate RNAs.

RNA editing in the kinetoplastid Trypanosoma brucei results in the addition and deletion of uridine residues within several mitochondrial mRNAs. The site and number of uridines added appears to be directed by small (approximately 70 nt) guide RNAs (gRNAs), which can base pair to the edited sequences. We examined reactions involving synthetic cytochrome b (CYb) gRNA and pre-edited mRNA in vitro. A major product of the in vitro reaction is a chimeric RNA molecule containing both gRNA and mRNA sequences. Formation of the CYb gRNA-mRNA chimera was specific, since such molecules did not accumulate when either the gRNA or mRNA was substituted with control RNAs. The reaction required a free 3' hydroxyl on the gRNA and was unaffected by capping of the gRNA's 5' end. Direct RNA sequencing indicated that the CYb gRNA is covalently linked via its 3' poly(U) tail to one of the editing sites on the CYb mRNA. These results suggest that the U's added during editing are donated by the poly(U) tail of a gRNA via a chimeric gRNA-mRNA intermediate.     

Resolution of the RNA editing gRNA-directed endonuclease from two other endonucleases of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondria.

RNA editing in kinetoplastids, the specific insertion and deletion of U residues, requires endonuclease cleavage of the pre-mRNA at each cycle of insertion/deletion. We have resolved three endoribonuclease activities from Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial extracts that cleave CYb pre-mRNA specifically. One of these, which sediments at approximately 20S and is not affected substantially by DTT, has all the features of the editing endonuclease. It cleaves CYb pre-edited or partially edited mRNA only when annealed to the anchor region of a cognate guide RNA (gRNA), and it cleaves accurately just 5' of the duplex region. Its specificity is for the 5' end of extended duplex RNA regions, and this prevents cleavage of the gRNA or other positions in the mRNA. This gRNA-directed nuclease is evidently the same activity that functions in A6 pre-mRNA editing. However, it is distinct and separable from a previously observed DTT-requiring endonuclease that sediments similarly under certain conditions, but does not cleave precisely at the first editing site in either the presence or absence of a gRNA. The editing nuclease is also distinct from a DTT-inhibited endonuclease that cleaves numerous free pre-mRNAs at a common structure in the region of the first editing site.     

Trypanosome RNA editing: simple guide RNA features enhance U deletion 100-fold

Trypanosome RNA editing is a massive processing of mRNA by U deletion and U insertion, directed by trans-acting guide RNAs (gRNAs). A U deletion cycle and a U insertion cycle have been reproduced in vitro using synthetic ATPase (A6) pre-mRNA and gRNA. Here we examine which gRNA features are important for this U deletion. We find that, foremost, this editing depends critically on the single-stranded character of a few gRNA and a few mRNA residues abutting the anchor duplex, a feature not previously appreciated. That plus any base-pairing sequence to tether the upstream mRNA are all the gRNA needs to direct unexpectedly efficient in vitro U deletion, using either the purified editing complex or whole extract. In fact, our optimized gRNA constructs support faithful U deletion up to 100 times more efficiently than the natural gRNA, and they can edit the majority of mRNA molecules. This is a marked improvement of in vitro U deletion, in which previous artificial gRNAs were no more active than natural gRNA and the editing efficiencies were at most a few percent. Furthermore, this editing is not stimulated by most other previously noted gRNA features, including its potential ligation bridge, 3' OH moiety, any U residues in the tether, the conserved structure of the central region, or proteins that normally bind these regions. Our data also have implications about evolutionary forces active in RNA editing.     

Studies of the 5' exonuclease and endonuclease activities of CPSF-73 in histone pre-mRNA processing

Processing of histone pre-mRNA requires a single 3′ endonucleolytic cleavage guided by the U7 snRNP that binds downstream of the cleavage site. Following cleavage, the downstream cleavage product (DCP) is rapidly degraded in vitro by a nuclease that also depends on the U7 snRNP. Our previous studies demonstrated that the endonucleolytic cleavage is catalyzed by the cleavage/polyadenylation factor CPSF-73. Here, by using RNA substrates with different nucleotide modifications, we characterize the activity that degrades the DCP. We show that the degradation is blocked by a 2′-O-methyl nucleotide and occurs in the 5′-to-3′ direction. The U7-dependent 5′ exonuclease activity is processive and continues degrading the DCP substrate even after complete removal of the U7-binding site. Thus, U7 snRNP is required only to initiate the degradation. UV cross-linking studies demonstrate that the DCP and its 5′-truncated version specifically interact with CPSF-73, strongly suggesting that in vitro, the same protein is responsible for the endonucleolytic cleavage of histone pre-mRNA and the subsequent degradation of the DCP. By using various RNA substrates, we define important space requirements upstream and downstream of the cleavage site that dictate whether CPSF-73 functions as an endonuclease or a 5′ exonuclease. RNA interference experiments with HeLa cells indicate that degradation of the DCP does not depend on the Xrn2 5′ exonuclease, suggesting that CPSF-73 degrades the DCP both in vitro and in vivo.     

The mechanism of U insertion/deletion RNA editing in kinetoplastid mitochondria.

Recent advances in in vitrosystems and identification of putative enzymatic activities have led to the acceptance of a modified 'enzyme cascade' model for U insertion/deletion RNA editing in kinetoplastid mitochondria. Models involving the transfer of uridines (Us) from the 3'-end of gRNA to the editing site appear to be untenable. Two types of in vitrosystems have been reported: (i) a gRNA-independent U insertion activity that is dependent on the secondary structure of the mRNA; (ii) a gRNA-dependent U insertion activity that requires addition of a gRNA that can form an anchor duplex with the pre-edited mRNA and which contains guiding A and G nucleotides to base pair with the added Us. In the case of the gRNA-mediated reaction, the precise site of cleavage is at the end of the gRNA-mRNA anchor duplex, as predicted by the original model. The model has been modified to include the addition of multiple Us to the 3'-end of the 5'-cleavage fragment, followed by the formation of base pairs with the guiding nucleotides and trimming back of the single-stranded oligo(U) 3'-overhang. The two fragments, which are held together by the gRNA 'splint', are then ligated. Circumstantial in vitroevidence for involvement of an RNA ligase and an endoribonuclease, which are components of a 20S complex, was obtained. Efforts are underway in several laboratories to isolate and characterize specific components of the editing machinery.     

A hammerhead ribozyme substrate and reporter for in vitro kinetoplastid RNA editing

Current in vitro assays for RNA editing in kinetoplastids directly examine the products generated by incubation of pre-mRNA substrate with guide RNA (gRNA) and mitochondrial (mt) extract. RNA editing substrates that are modeled on hammerhead ribozymes were designed with catalytic cores that contained or lacked additional uridylates (Us). They proved to be sensitive reporters of editing activity when used for in vitro assays. A deletion editing substrate that is based on A6 pre-mRNA had no ribozyme activity, but its incubation with gRNA and mt extract resulted in its deletion editing and production of a catalytically active ribozyme. Hammerhead ribozymes are thus sensitive tools to assay in vitro RNA editing.     

A mRNA determinant of gRNA-directed kinetoplastid editing

Several mitochondrial mRNAs of the kinetoplastid protozoa do not encode a functional open reading frame until they have been edited through the addition or deletion of U nucleotides at specific sites. Genetic information specifying the location and extent of editing is present on guide RNAs (gRNAs). The sequence adjacent to most mRNA editing sites has a high purine content which previously has been proposed to facilitate the editing reaction through base-pairing to a poly(U) tail at the 3′ end of the gRNA. We demonstrate here that gRNA binding alone is insufficient to create an editing site and that the mRNA sequence near an editing site is an additional determinant affecting the efficiency of the reaction.     

Native Variants of the MRB1 Complex Exhibit Specialized Functions in Kinetoplastid RNA Editing

Adaptation and survival of Trypanosoma brucei requires editing of mitochondrial mRNA by uridylate (U) insertion and deletion. Hundreds of small guide RNAs (gRNAs) direct the mRNA editing at over 3,000 sites. RNA editing is controlled during the life cycle but the regulation of substrate and stage specificity remains unknown. Editing progresses in the 3’ to 5’ direction along the pre-mRNA in blocks, each targeted by a unique gRNA. A critical editing factor is the mitochondrial RNA binding complex 1 (MRB1) that binds gRNA and transiently interacts with the catalytic RNA editing core complex (RECC). MRB1 is a large and dynamic complex that appears to be comprised of distinct but related subcomplexes (termed here MRBs). MRBs seem to share a ‘core’ complex of proteins but differ in the composition of the ‘variable’ proteins. Since some proteins associate transiently the MRBs remain imprecisely defined. MRB1 controls editing by unknown mechanisms, and the functional relevance of the different MRBs is unclear. We previously identified two distinct MRBs, and showed that they carry mRNAs that undergo editing. We proposed that editing takes place in the MRBs because MRBs stably associate with mRNA and gRNA but only transiently interact with RECC, which is RNA free. Here, we identify the first specialized functions in MRBs: 1) 3010-MRB is a major scaffold for RNA editing, and 2) REH2-MRB contains a critical trans-acting RNA helicase (REH2) that affects multiple steps of editing function in 3010-MRB. These trans effects of the REH2 include loading of unedited mRNA and editing in the first block and in subsequent blocks as editing progresses. REH2 binds its own MRB via RNA, and conserved domains in REH2 were critical for REH2 to associate with the RNA and protein components of its MRB. Importantly, REH2 associates with a ~30 kDa RNA-binding protein in a novel ~15S subcomplex in RNA-depleted mitochondria. We use these new results to update our model of MRB function and organization.     

Uridylate-specific 3' 5'-exoribonucleases involved in uridylate-deletion RNA editing in trypanosomatid mitochondria

In kinetoplastid protists, maturation of mitochondrial pre-mRNAs involves the insertion and deletion of uridylates (Us) within coding regions, as specified by mitochondrial DNA-encoded guide RNAs. U-deletion editing involves endonucleolytic cleavage of the pre-mRNA at the editing site followed by U-specific 3'-5'-exonucleolytic removal of nonbase-paired Us prior to ligation of the two mRNA cleavage fragments. We showed previously that an exonuclease/endonuclease/phosphatase (EEP) motif protein from Leishmania major, designated RNA editing exonuclease 1 (REX1) (Kang, X., Rogers, K., Gao, G., Falick, A. M., Zhou, S.-L., and Simpson, L. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102, 1017-1022), exhibits 3'-5'-exonuclease activity. Two EEP motif proteins have also been identified in the Trypanosoma brucei editing complex. TbREX1 is a homologue of LmREX1, and TbREX2 shows homology to another editing protein in L. major, which lacks the EEP motif (LmREX2*). Here we have expressed the T. brucei EEP motif proteins in insect cells and purified them to homogeneity. We showed that these are U-specific 3'-5'-exonucleases that are inhibited by base pairing of 3' Us. The recombinant EEP motif alone also showed 3'-5' U-specific exonuclease activity, and mutations of the REX EEP motifs greatly reduced exonuclease activity. The absence of enzymatic activity in LmREX2* was confirmed with a purified recombinant protein. We showed that pre-cleaved U-deletion editing could be reconstituted with either TbREX1 or TbREX2 in combination with either RNA ligase, LmREL1, or LmREL2. Down-regulation of TbREX2 expression by conditional RNA interference had little effect on parasite viability or sedimentation of the L-complex, suggesting either that TbREX2 is inactive in vivo or that TbREX1 can compensate for the loss of TbREX2 function in down-regulated cells.     

gRNA/pre-mRNA annealing and RNA chaperone activities of RBP16

Editing in trypanosomes involves the addition or deletion of uridines at specific sites to produce translatable mitochondrial mRNAs. RBP16 is an accessory factor from Trypanosoma brucei that affects mitochondrial RNA editing in vivo and also stimulates editing in vitro. We report here experiments aimed at elucidating the biochemical activities of RBP16 involved in modulating RNA editing. In vitro RNA annealing assays demonstrate that RBP16 significantly stimulates the annealing of gRNAs to cognate pre-mRNAs. In addition, RBP16 also facilitates hybridization of partially complementary RNAs unrelated to the editing process. The RNA annealing activity of RBP16 is independent of its high-affinity binding to gRNA oligo(U) tails, consistent with the previously reported in vitro editing stimulatory properties of the protein. In vivo studies expressing recombinant RBP16 in mutant Escherichia coli strains demonstrate that RBP16 is an RNA chaperone and that in addition to RNA annealing activity, it contains RNA unwinding activity. Our data suggest that the mechanism by which RBP16 facilitates RNA editing involves its capacity to modulate RNA secondary structure and promote gRNA/pre-mRNA annealing.     

Chimeric gRNA-mRNA molecules with oligo(U) tails covalently linked at sites of RNA editing suggest that U addition occurs by transesterification.

Chimeric RNA molecules were detected by polymerase chain reaction amplification of kinetoplast RNA using a 3' primer specific to mRNA and a 5' primer specific to guide RNA (gRNA), and directly by Northern analysis. Covalent linkage of the 3' oligo(U) tail of the gRNA to the mRNA occurs at editing sites. Chimeric molecules were isolated for NADH dehydrogenase subunit 7 and cytochrome oxidase subunits II and III. We propose that these molecules are intermediates in the editing process and that successive transesterifications result in the transfer of uridine residues from the gRNA 3' oligo(U) tail to an editing site, with the number of uridine residues determined by base pairing with adenine and guanine "guide" nucleotides in the gRNA.     

Guide RNA-directed uridine insertion RNA editing in vitro.

Guide RNAs (gRNAs) have been proposed to mediate uridine (U) addition/deletion editing of mitochondrial mRNAs in kinetoplastid protozoa. The Us are proposed to be derived either from UTP by two successive cleavage-ligations or transesterifications, or from the 3' end of the gRNA by the same mechanisms. We have demonstrated gRNA-dependent U insertions into a specific editing site of a pre-edited mRNA which was incubated in a mitochondrial extract from Leishmania tarentolae. The predominant number of U insertions was determined by the number of guiding nucleotides in the added gRNA, and the formation of a gRNA-mRNA anchor duplex was necessary for activity. UTP and alpha-beta bond hydrolysis of ATP were required, and the activity was inhibited above 50-100 mM KCl. A gRNA-independent insertion of up to approximately 13 Us occurred in the absence of the added cognate gRNA; the extent of this activity was affected by sequences upstream and downstream of the edited region. Heparin inhibited the gRNA-independent U insertion activity and had no effect on the gRNA-dependent activity. Blocking the 3' OH of the gRNA had little effect on the gRNA-dependent U insertion activity. The data are consistent with a cleavage-ligation model in which the Us are derived directly from UTP.