首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Troponin extracted from rabbit skeletal muscle directly binds to an actin filament in a molar ratio of 1:1 even in the absence of tropomyosin. An actin filament decorated with troponin did not exhibit significant difference from pure actin filaments in the maximum rate of actomyosin ATP hydrolysis and the sliding velocity of the filament examined by means of an in vitro motility assay. However, the relative number of troponin-bound actin filaments moving in the absence of calcium ions decreased to half that in their presence. The amount of HMM bound to the filaments was less than 4% of actin monomers in the presence of TNs. In addition, actin filaments could not move when Tn molecules were bound in the molar ratio of about 1:1 although they sufficiently bind to myosin heads. These results indicate that troponin can transform an actin monomer within a filament into an Off-state without sterically blocking of the myosin-binding sites with tropomyosin molecules.  相似文献   

2.
Rat mesangial cell-matrix interactions in culture   总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5  
The glomerular mesangium contains fibronectin (FN), laminin, and collagen IV, but it remains unclear whether these matrix proteins affect mesangial cellular functions. The present experiments were designed to test whether cell-matrix interactions could affect some functions of mesangial cells. Cultured rat mesangial cells synthesized a cellular form of FN that was both secreted and incorporated into an extensive, fibrillar pericellular matrix. This FN matrix was increased in high-density cultures and was more developed in human mesangial cells. Rat mesangial cells in vitro displayed a marked capacity to incorporate exogenous FN into a pericellular matrix, demonstrating that accumulations of FN in the mesangial matrix could result from endogenous and/or exogenous sources. Rat mesangial cells also expressed RGD-sensitive integrin receptors for FN, laminin, and collagens I and IV that promoted cell adhesion and that directed differential changes in morphology. Indirect evidence suggested the existence of other mesangial binding sites for extracellular matrix proteins. FN and collagen IV also stimulated modest increases in [3H]thymidine uptake and cell number by quiescent cells. Taken together, these results suggest that cultured mesangial cells present a model system for studying the regulation of cell-matrix interactions in the mesangium.  相似文献   

3.
Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis   总被引:57,自引:13,他引:44       下载免费PDF全文
Cell-matrix interactions have major effects upon phenotypic features such as gene regulation, cytoskeletal structure, differentiation, and aspects of cell growth control. Programmed cell death (apoptosis) is crucial for maintaining appropriate cell number and tissue organization. It was therefore of interest to determine whether cell- matrix interactions affect apoptosis. The present report demonstrates that apoptosis was induced by disruption of the interactions between normal epithelial cells and extracellular matrix. We have termed this phenomenon "anoikis." Overexpression of bcl-2 protected cells against anoikis. Cellular sensitivity to anoikis was apparently regulated: (a) anoikis did not occur in normal fibroblasts; (b) it was abrogated in epithelial cells by transformation with v-Ha-ras, v-src, or treatment with phorbol ester; (c) sensitivity to anoikis was conferred upon HT1080 cells or v-Ha-ras-transformed MDCK cells by reverse- transformation with adenovirus E1a; (d) anoikis in MDCK cells was alleviated by the motility factor, scatter factor. The results suggest that the circumvention of anoikis accompanies the acquisition of anchorage independence or cell motility.  相似文献   

4.
Cell mechanical behavior has traditionally been studied using 2-D planar elastic substrates. The goal of this study was to directly assess cell-matrix mechanical interactions inside more physiologic 3-D collagen matrices. Rabbit corneal fibroblasts transfected to express GFP-zyxin were plated at low density inside 100 micro m-thick type I collagen matrices. 3-D datasets of isolated cells were acquired at 1-3-min intervals for up to 5 h using fluorescent and Nomarski DIC imaging. Unlike cells on 2-D substrates, cells inside the collagen matrices had a bipolar morphology with thin pseudopodial processes, and without lamellipodia. The organization of the collagen fibrils surrounding each cell was clearly visualized using DIC. Using time-lapse color overlays of GFP and DIC images, displacement and/or realignment of collagen fibrils by focal adhesions could be directly visualized. During pseudopodial extension, new focal adhesions often formed in a line along collagen fibrils in front of the cell, while existing adhesions moved backward. This process generated tractional forces as indicated by the pulling in of collagen fibrils in front of the cell. Meanwhile, adhesions on both the dorsal and ventral surface of the cell body generally moved forward, resulting in contractile shortening along the pseudopodia and localized extracellular matrix (ECM) compression. Cytochalasin D induced rapid disassembly of focal adhesions, cell elongation, and ECM relaxation. This experimental model allows direct, dynamic assessment of cell-matrix interactions inside a 3-D fibrillar ECM. The data suggest that adhesions organize along actin-based contractile elements that are much less complex than the network of actin filaments that mechanically links lamellar adhesions on 2-D substrates.  相似文献   

5.
《Organogenesis》2013,9(2):170-176
Cell sheet engineering has enabled the production of confluent cell sheets stacked together for use as a cardiac patch to increase cell survival rate and engraftment after transplantation, thereby providing a promising strategy for high density stem cell delivery for cardiac repair. One key challenge in using cell sheet technology is the difficulty of cell sheet handling due to its weak mechanical properties. A single-layer cell sheet is generally very fragile and tends to break or clump during harvest. Effective transfer and stacking methods are needed to move cell sheet technology into widespread clinical applications. In this study, we developed a simple and effective micropipette based method to aid cell sheet transfer and stacking. The cell viability after transfer was tested and multi-layer stem cell sheets were fabricated using the developed method. Furthermore, we examined the interactions between stacked stem cell sheets and fibrin matrix. Our results have shown that the preserved ECM associated with the detached cell sheet greatly facilitates its adherence to fibrin matrix and enhances the cell sheet-matrix interactions. Accelerated fibrin degradation caused by attached cell sheets was also observed.  相似文献   

6.
Cell sheet engineering has enabled the production of confluent cell sheets stacked together for use as a cardiac patch to increase cell survival rate and engraftment after transplantation, thereby providing a promising strategy for high density stem cell delivery for cardiac repair. One key challenge in using cell sheet technology is the difficulty of cell sheet handling due to its weak mechanical properties. A single-layer cell sheet is generally very fragile and tends to break or clump during harvest. Effective transfer and stacking methods are needed to move cell sheet technology into widespread clinical applications. In this study, we developed a simple and effective micropipette based method to aid cell sheet transfer and stacking. The cell viability after transfer was tested and multi-layer stem cell sheets were fabricated using the developed method. Furthermore, we examined the interactions between stacked stem cell sheets and fibrin matrix. Our results have shown that the preserved ECM associated with the detached cell sheet greatly facilitates its adherence to fibrin matrix and enhances the cell sheet-matrix interactions. Accelerated fibrin degradation caused by attached cell sheets was also observed.  相似文献   

7.
Interactions between endothelial cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix are continuously adapted during angiogenesis, from early sprouting through to lumen formation and vessel maturation. Regulated control of these interactions is crucial to sustain normal responses in this rapidly changing environment, and dysfunctional endothelial cell behaviour results in angiogenic disorders. The proteoglycan decorin, an extracellular matrix component, is upregulated during angiogenesis. While it was shown previously that the absence of decorin leads to dysregulated angiogenesis in vivo, the molecular mechanisms were not clear. These abnormal endothelial cell responses have been attributed to indirect effects of decorin; however, our recent data provides evidence that decorin directly regulates endothelial cell-matrix interactions. This data will be discussed in conjunction with findings from previous studies, to better understand the role of this proteoglycan in angiogenesis.Key words: decorin, angiogenesis, motility, α2β1 integrin, insulin-like growth factor I receptor, Rac GTPaseLed by appropriate cues, the vascular system undergoes postnatal remodelling (angiogenesis), to maintain tissue homeostasis. Thus while much of the mature endothelium is quiescent, locally activated endothelial cells re-enter the cell cycle, and assume a motile phenotype essential for sprouting and neo-vessel formation. Concomitantly, the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM) is significantly altered through de novo protein expression, deposition of plasma components and protease-mediated degradation. The latter liberates cryptic binding sites and sequestered growth factors in addition to intact and degraded ECM components, which themselves possess pro- and anti-angiogenic signalling properties. For supported blood flow, endothelium quiescence and integrity is re-established, and the ECM is organized into mature, cross-linked networks. In short, endothelial cells regulate ECM synthesis, assembly and turnover while the structure and composition of ECM in turn influences cellular phenotype. The ECM therefore, plays a critical role in control of endothelial cell behaviour during angiogenesis.Decorin is a member of the small leucine-rich repeat proteoglycan (SLRP) family, which was first discovered ‘decorating’ collagen I fibrils and was subsequently shown to regulate fibrillogenesis.1,2 Both the protein core and the single, covalently attached glycosaminoglycan (GAG) moieties of decorin are involved in this function, the relevance of which is demonstrated by the phenotype of the decorin null mouse, which exhibits loose, fragile skin due to dysregulated fibrillogenesis.2 Interestingly, a role for decorin in postnatal angiogenesis was also revealed by studies in the decorin null background. Corneal neoangiogenesis was reduced.3 Conversely, neo-angiogenesis was enhanced during dermal wound healing, although surprisingly this led to delayed wound closure.4 In this case, skin fragility due to the absence of decorin may have hindered wound closure, despite an increased blood supply. It is apparent however, that decorin plays a role in inflammation-associated angiogenesis. Indeed, endothelial cells undergoing angiogenic morphogenesis in this environment express decorin, while quiescent endothelial cells do not,36 indicating that decorin modulates endothelial cell behaviour specifically during inflammatory-associated remodelling of the vascular system.To understand decorin effects on angiogenic morphogenesis within a minimalist environment, various in vitro models of angiogenesis have been employed (6 Similarly, decorin expression enhanced tube formation on matrigel,8 but in other studies utilising this substrate was found to either have no influence9 or to inhibit tubulogenesis induced by growth factors.10 In yet another study, decorin inhibited tube formation when presented as a substrate prior to addition of collagen I.7 These contrasting observations may reflect the importance of the micro-environment within which decorin is presented. Alternatively, controversial results could result from different sources of decorin since cell types differ in their post-translational modifications of the GAG moiety. Hence, varying length or sulfation patterns of GAG chains may account for different biological activities of decorin. Discrepancies can also be explained as artefacts due to different purification protocols, such as when denaturing conditions are used to extract decorin from tissue. Taken together however, these observations suggest that decorin is neither a pro- nor an anti-angiogenic factor per se, but rather a regulator of angiogenesis, dependent on local cues for different activities. Further, that decorin is capable of both enhancing and inhibiting tubulogenesis may suggest a role in balancing vessel regression versus persistence. Immature vessels have a period of plasticity prior to maturation, during which they can be remodelled, and either regress, or given the appropriate signals, proceed to maturity.11 As a modulator of tube formation, it is tempting to speculate that decorin could influence the switch from immature to mature vessels, favouring one or the other in conjunction with signals from the local environment.

Table 1

Summary of the key functions of decorin in controlling cell behaviour
Cell typeFunctionDecorin additionEnvironment/MechanismReferences
Endothelial (HUVEC derived)Enhanced tubulogenesisOverexpressionCollagen I lattices, enhanced survival potentially IGF-IR mediated6, 18
Mouse cerebral endothelial cellsEnhanced tubulogenesisOverexpressionMatrigel substrate, EGFR activation leads to VEGF upregulation8
HUVECNo effect on tubulogenesisExogenousMatrigel substrate9
HUVECInhibited tubulogenesisExogenousMatrigel substrate, growth factor induced10
HUVEC, HDMECInhibited tubulogenesisSubstrateCollagen I lattice overlay7
HUVECMinimal adhesionSubstrateDecorin substrate7
HUVECInhibited adhesionExogenousCollagen I and fibronectin10
HUVECInhibited migrationExogenousVEGF-mediated chemotaxis through gelatin10
Endothelial (HUVEC derived)Enhanced adhesionExogenousCollagen I, fibronectin17
BAEInhibited migrationOverexpressionCollagen I, enhanced fibronectin fibrilllogenesis by decorin12
Endothelial (HUVEC derived)Enhanced motilityExogenousCollagen I, Decorin activates IGF-IR/Rac-1 and α2β1 integrin activity17
Human lung fibroblastEnhanced motilityExogenousDecorin activates Rho GTPases, mediators of motility20
Human foreskin fibroblastInhibited adhesionExogenousDecorin GAG moiety competes with CD44 for binding to collagen XIV14
Mouse Fibroblast (3T3)Inhibited adhesionExogenousDecorin competes with cells for interaction with thrombospondin at the cell-binding domain15
Human fibroblastInhibits adhesionExogenousDecorin GAG competes with cell-surface heparin-sulphate for interaction with fibronectin16
PlateletsSupported adhesionSubstrateDecorin interacts with, and signals through α2β1 integrin on platelets19
Open in a separate windowDecorin has been demonstrated to influence cell adhesion and motility, in particular, its influence on endothelial cell adhesion, migration and tube formation is controversial, and is the main focus of this table. Some additional key effects of decorin on fibroblast and platelet adhesion and motility are also summarised. In each case, the extracellular matrix environment in which the assay was conducted is shown, and where known, the proposed mechanism is stated.What are the molecular mechanisms by which decorin influences tubulogenesis? Since endothelial cell-matrix interactions control all aspects of angiogenesis, from motility, sprouting and lumen formation, to survival and proliferation, the role of decorin should be considered in this regard. Indirectly, decorin could quite feasibly modulate cell-matrix interactions through regulation of matrix structure and organisation2,12 and growth factor activity.13 However in vitro studies have begun to unravel rather more direct mechanisms. Studies on fibroblasts indicate that decorin can inhibit cell-matrix interactions by binding to and masking integrin attachment sites in matrix substrates. For instance, decorin inhibits fibroblast adhesion by competing with cell-surface GAG-containing CD44 for GAG binding sites on collagen XIV;14 similarly, decorin inhibits fibroblast adhesion to thrombospondin by interacting with the cell-binding domain of this substrate15 and may compete with fibroblast cell-surface heparin sulphate proteoglycans for binding to fibronectin.16 While such studies are rather lacking in endothelial cell systems, any one of these interactions could be relevant to endothelial cells. However, that decorin slightly enhanced endothelial cell attachment to fibronectin and collagen I in our system points to the existence of alternative mechanisms.17Indeed, a recent study demonstrated that decorin is an important signalling molecule in endothelial cells, where it both signals through the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR) and competes with the natural ligand for interaction.18 Further, decorin appears to be biologically available and relevant for interaction with this receptor in vivo. Increased receptor expression was observed in both native and neo-vessels in decorin knockout mouse cornea in conjunction with reduced neoangiogenesis. In accordance with this, decorin downregulates the IGF-IR in vitro,18 indicating that signalling through, and control of IGF-IR levels by decorin could be an important factor in regulating angiogenesis. Additionally, immobilised decorin supports platelet adhesion through interactions with the collagen I-binding integrin, α2β1.19 We have shown that decorin—α2β1 integrin interaction may play a part in modulating endothelial cell—collagen I interactions, and further, have demonstrated that decorin promotes motility in this context through activation of IGF-IR and the small Rho GTPase, Rac.17 Similarly, decorin stimulates fibroblast motility through activation of small Rho GTPases,20 supporting a direct mechanism by which decorin influences cell-matrix interactions and motility, via activation of key regulators of cytoskeleton and focal adhesion dynamics. It should also be noted that signalling by decorin directly through ErbB receptors has also been extensively demonstrated in cancer cell systems where these receptors are frequently overexpressed.21 This interaction was not relevant to human umbilical vein endothelial cells18 although a recent study found that decorin activated the epidermal growth factor receptor in mouse cerebral endothelial cells.8 These differences presumably depend on cell-specific factors such as receptor availability as well as relative receptor affinities. In a complex system such as angiogenesis, multiple mechanisms doubtlessly are involved. However, it is clear that modulation of cell-matrix interactions by decorin could certainly be expected to play a key role in contributing to regulation of postnatal angiogenesis.Signals from the extracellular matrix via integrins and from growth factors to their receptors are co-ordinately integrated into the complex angiogenic cascade. Evidence exists to suggest that decorin could regulate cell-matrix interactions during early tube formation, i.e., endothelial cell sprouting and cell alignment, through both influencing integrin activity and signalling through IGF-IR.17 Later stages of angiogenesis, such as lumen formation and maturation are also potentially regulated by decorin through activation of Rac and α2β1 integrin,17 since activity of both these molecules is integral to this phase of angiogenesis.22 Additionally, Rac activity is implicated in regulating endothelium permeability and integrity,23 providing further possibilities in control of endothelium function by decorin. Further investigations would be required however, to establish whether decorin exerts its effects on tubulogenesis through these molecular mechanisms.Of relevance to α2β1 integrin-dependent endothelial cell interaction with collagen I, sprouting endothelial cells would encounter interstitial ECM, of which collagen I is a major component. Further, a ‘provisional’ matrix containing collagen I is secreted by sprouting endothelial cells and may be required for motility,24 and tube formation.25 Theoretically, various interactions could exist between decorin, collagen type I and α2β1 integrin in this context, which may be differentially supported through various stages of angiogenesis. Up to eleven interaction sites of α2β1 integrin have been postulated to exist within collagen I, albeit with different affinities towards this receptor. Some of these binding sites may only be recognized by the integrin in its highly active conformation.26 By influencing the collagen I binding activity of α2β117 decorin could thus alter the number of endothelial cell—collagen I contacts, thereby modulating adhesion and motility. Additionally, some decorin and α2β1 integrin binding sites may overlap, or are in close proximity.27 By virtue of this location, decorin would be ideally placed to locally modulate collagen I—binding activity of the integrin. Interestingly, modulation of activity of both α2β1 integrin and the small Rho GTPase Rac by decorin also could have implications for collagen I fibrillogenesis, which in turn, would indirectly influence cell-matrix interactions. Both the related Rho GTPase RhoA, and α2β1 integrin are involved in cellular control of pericellular collagen I fibrillogenesis.28 Thus in addition to regulating cell independent fibrillogenesis1 decorin could potentially influence cell-mediated aspects of this process. Pertinent questions remain therefore, as to under which biological situations is the interaction between α2β1 integrin and decorin relevant, and does decorin influence α2β1 integrin activity on the cell-surface through direct interactions, and/or by inside-out signalling through the IGF-I receptor (or alternative receptors)? Further, how do differential decorin/α2β1 integrin/collagen I interactions mediate fibrillogenesis and cell-matrix interactions?Interaction of decorin with multiple binding partners makes it challenging to fully understand the role of decorin in angiogenesis (Fig. 1). A consideration of the relative accessibility and affinity of binding sites on both decorin and its'' binding partners would facilitate further understanding. It is still an open question whether collagen I—bound decorin can simultaneously interact with other ligands. In the case of the IGF-IR, the binding site on the concave surface of decorin overlaps with that of collagen I, thus mutually exclusive interactions seem more likely. That decorin clearly influences both collagen I matrix integrity and IGF-IR activity in vivo, would suggest that decorin is not exclusively associated with collagen I. Perhaps decorin occurs in a more ‘soluble’ form when locally secreted by endothelial cells undergoing angiogenic morphogenesis. Does collagen-bound decorin interact simultaneously with α2β1 integrin? This could be a possibility, since decorin core protein interacts with collagen I, allowing the possibility of GAG—integrin interaction. In this scenario however, interaction of α2β1 integrin with the GAG moiety of decorin in preference to collagen I might sound improbable. Nevertheless, during remodelling, interactions such as these could occur in a transient manner, and be crucial in controlling cell-matrix interactions in a rapidly changing environment. Interestingly, decorin interacts with IGF-IR via the core protein,18 and with α2β1 integrin via the GAG moiety17 raising yet another possibility of simultaneous decorin interaction with multiple binding partners. Additionally, while it is a matter of some debate whether decorin exists predominantly as a monomer or as a dimer in a physiologically relevant environment, it has been proposed that collagen-bound decorin could support simultaneous interactions of decorin with additional binding partners, and that dimer-monomer transitions also could facilitate differential interactions.29 Perhaps supporting multiple simultaneous interactions of decorin, the phenotype of patients with a progeroid variant of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome indicates an essential role for properly glycosylated decorin (and the related SLRP biglycan). These patients exhibit skeletal and craniofacial abnormalities, loose skin and deficiencies in wound healing as a direct result of abnormal decorin and biglycan glycosylation, such that approximately half the population of decorin is secreted as the core protein only.30 Notably, the defect in loose skin and in wound healing is similar to the phenotype of the decorin knockout mouse.2,4 Evidently, the core protein alone cannot maintain normal function in vivo, despite being responsible for several important interactions of decorin, in particular, binding to collagen I and the IGF-IR. These studies may therefore support a requirement for simultaneous interactions of the core protein and GAG moieties for proper function of decorin.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Decorin influences cell-matrix interactions through multiple mechanisms. Decorin signals through the IGF-IR via the core protein moiety (grey diamond), and may simultaneously interact with the α2 subunit (cross-hatched subunit) of α2β1 integrin via the GAG moiety (wavy black line) (A). Activation of Rac through IGF-IR enhances motility by modulating cytoskeleton dynamics and may influence α2β1 integrin activity for collagen I through inside-out signalling (B). Decorin induces large, peripheral vinculin (grey oval)-positive focal adhesions by signalling through IGF-IR and/or α2β1 integrin (C and D). Decorin could also directly influence α2β1 integrin activity through binding to the α2 subunit and/or simultaneous interactions with collagen I (thick wavy black line) through the core protein. Collagen I interacts with the A-domain (white circle) of the α2 subunit at a site distinct to that of decorin (D). In summary, activation of IGF-IR, Rac and modulation of α2β1 integrin affinity for collagen I by decorin modulates cell-matrix interactions and contributes to enhanced motility and tubulogenesis in a collagen I environment.Modulation of cell-matrix interactions by decorin plays a key role in modulating endothelial cell motility and angiogenesis in vivo, and some of the mechanisms responsible have been elucidated in conjunction with in vitro studies. The large number of potential interactions of decorin with multiple matrix components and cell-surface receptors makes a clear understanding difficult. However, direct activation of signalling pathways by decorin has been highlighted recently as likely to play an important role. In conclusion, a better understanding of the mechanisms by which decorin regulates vessel formation and persistence would contribute to understanding how angiogenesis is dysregulated in a clinical setting, and how rational therapeutic strategies can be developed to restore tissue function and homeostasis.  相似文献   

8.
Interactions between endothelial cells and the surrounding extracellular matrix are continuously adapted during angiogenesis, from early sprouting through to lumen formation and vessel maturation. Regulated control of these interactions is crucial to sustain normal responses in this rapidly changing environment, and dysfunctional endothelial cell behaviour results in angiogenic disorders. The proteoglycan decorin, an extracellular matrix component, is upregulated during angiogenesis. While it was shown previously that the absence of decorin leads to dysregulated angiogenesis in vivo, the molecular mechanisms were not clear. These abnormal endothelial cell responses have been attributed to indirect effects of decorin; however, our recent data provides evidence that decorin directly regulates endothelial cell-matrix interactions. This data will be discussed in conjunction with findings from previous studies, to better understand the role of this proteoglycan in angiogenesis.  相似文献   

9.
ADAMs: modulators of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions   总被引:12,自引:0,他引:12  
ADAMs contain adhesive and metalloprotease domains. As major ectodomain sheddases, they release a variety of cell-surface proteins, including growth factors, cytokines, cell adhesion molecules and receptors. ADAMs can also cleave and remodel components of the extracellular matrix. Hence, ADAMs are emerging as key modulators of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Important questions, including if and how ADAM adhesive domains promote ADAM protease function, are currently being addressed.  相似文献   

10.
11.
12.
13.
The interactions between biochemical processes and mechanical signaling play important roles during various cellular processes such as wound healing, embryogenesis, metastasis, and cell migration. While traditional traction force measurements have provided quantitative information about cell matrix interactions in two dimensions, recent studies have shown significant differences in the behavior and morphology of cells when placed in three-dimensional environments. Hence new quantitative experimental techniques are needed to accurately determine cell traction forces in three dimensions. Recently, two approaches both based on laser scanning confocal microscopy have emerged to address this need. This study highlights the details, implementation and advantages of such a three-dimensional imaging methodology with the capability to compute cellular traction forces dynamically during cell migration and locomotion. An application of this newly developed three-dimensional traction force microscopy (3D TFM) technique to single cell migration studies of 3T3 fibroblasts is presented to show that this methodology offers a new quantitative vantage point to investigate the three-dimensional nature of cell-ECM interactions.  相似文献   

14.
15.
Drosophila PS2 integrin mediates RGD-dependent cell-matrix interactions.   总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3  
Integrins are a family of transmembrane glycoproteins that mediate cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions. We have transfected cultured Drosophila cells with genes that express the Drosophila PS2 integrin. We demonstrate that this integrin is expressed on the surface of the cells and can mediate cell spreading on an undefined component of fetal calf serum or on the purified vertebrate matrix molecules vitronectin and fibronectin. Additionally, PS2 integrin can cause cell spreading on RGD peptide. The spreading on matrix components or RGD peptide can be inhibited by soluble RGD peptide and is dependent on divalent cations.  相似文献   

16.
The latent plasma carboxypeptidase thrombin-activable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) is activated by thrombin/thrombomodulin on the endothelial cell surface, and functions in dampening fibrinolysis. In this study, we examined the effect of activated TAFI (TAFIa) in modulating the proinflammatory functions of bradykinin, complement C5a, and thrombin-cleaved osteopontin. Hydrolysis of bradykinin and C5a and thrombin-cleaved osteopontin peptides by TAFIa was as efficient as that of plasmin-cleaved fibrin peptides, indicating that these are also good substrates for TAFIa. Plasma carboxypeptidase N, generally regarded as the physiological regulator of kinins, was much less efficient than TAFIa. TAFIa abrogated C5a-induced neutrophil activation in vitro. Jurkat cell adhesion to osteopontin was markedly enhanced by thrombin cleavage of osteopontin. This was abolished by TAFIa treatment due to the removal of the C-terminal Arg168 by TAFIa from the exposed SVVYGLR alpha 4 beta 1 integrin-binding site in thrombin-cleaved osteopontin. Thus, thrombin cleavage of osteopontin followed by TAFIa treatment may sequentially up- and down-modulate the pro-inflammatory properties of osteopontin. An engineered anticoagulant thrombin, E229K, was able to activate endogenous plasma TAFI in mice, and E229K thrombin infusion effectively blocked bradykinin-induced hypotension in wild-type, but not in TAFI-deficient, mice in vivo. Our data suggest that TAFIa may have a broad anti-inflammatory role, and its function is not restricted to fibrinolysis.  相似文献   

17.
The formation of advanced glycation end-products plays a central role in the progressive deterioration of tissues with age, a process that is accelerated in diabetes. Collagen in addition to providing structure and tensile strength to tissues also provides a dynamic matrix for cells to interact with, and due to its long-lived nature is particularly susceptible to modification with age and disease. We have recently identified methylglyoxal as a key intermediate in this process, reacting predominantly with arginine residues to form imidazolone compounds. We therefore postulated that modification of RGD sequences in collagen with methylglyoxal would interfere with crucial cell-matrix interactions. To investigate this concept we studied the interaction of two cell lines, MG63 and HT1080, with collagen modified to varying degrees with respect to arginine. Adhesion and subsequent spreading of both cell lines was significantly decreased by minimal methylglyoxal modification leading to the conclusion that such modification of collagen severely inhibits cell matrix interactions, most likely via the loss of specific arginine residues involved in integrin mediated cell attachment. This is the first demonstration that methylglyoxal modification of collagen can affect cell-matrix interactions and introduces a possible mechanism by which some of the deleterious changes in tissues with age and disease are occurring.  相似文献   

18.
19.
Differentiation of marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitors to either the osteoblast or adipocyte lineage is reciprocally regulated. Factors that promote osteoblastogenesis inhibit adipogenesis, while adipogenic factors are inhibitory to osteoblast differentiation. Heparin, a soluble glycosaminoglycan, inhibits bone formation in vivo and osteoblast cell differentiation and function in vitro, and has been shown to promote adipocyte differentiation. To elucidate the role that heparin plays in the adipogenic induction of murine mesenchymal progenitors, we studied immortalized marrow stromal cells (IM-MSC), the MSC cell line, ST2, and 3T3L1 pre-adipocytes. Heparin alone was not sufficient to induce adipogenesis, but enhanced the induction under a variety of adipogenic cocktails. This effect was both dose- and time-dependent. Heparin showed a positive effect at concentrations > 0. 1 μg/ml when applied before day 3 during the induction course. Heparin's effect on adipogenesis was independent of cell proliferation, cell density, and extracellular lipid. This effect is likely related to the unique structure of heparin because another polyanionic glycosaminoglycan, dextran sulfate, did not promote adipogenic differentiation. Heparin treatment altered morphology and adhesion characteristics of progenitor cells, resulting in cell rounding and aggregation. As well, heparin counteracted the known inhibitory effect of fibronectin on adipogenesis and decreased basal focal adhesion kinase and paxillin phosphorylation. We conclude that heparin-mediated disruption of cell-matrix adhesion enhances adipogenic potential.  相似文献   

20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号