Histones and chromatin structure in hyperthermophilic Archaea

Abstract: HMf is a histone from the hyperthermophile Methanothermus fervidus . It is the archetype and most studied member of a family of archaeal histones that have primary sequences and three-dimensional structures in common with the eukaryal nucleosome core histones and that bind and compact DNA molecules into nucleosome-like structures (NLS). HMf preparations are mixtures of two similar, small (∼7.5 kDa) polypeptides designated HMfA and HMfB that in vivo form both homodimers and heterodimers. HMfA synthesis predominates during exponential growth but the relative amount of HMfB increases as M. fervidus cells enter the stationary growth phase. Analyses of homogeneous preparations of recombinant (r) (HMfA)₂ and (rHMfB)₂ have demonstrated that these proteins have different DNA-binding and compaction properties in vitro, consistent with different roles in vivo for the (HMfA)₂, (HMfB)₂ and HMfA · HMfB dimers, and for the NLS that they form, in regulating gene expression and in genome compaction and stability.     

Archaeal histone tetramerization determines DNA affinity and the direction of DNA supercoiling

DNA binding and the topology of DNA have been determined in complexes formed by >20 archaeal histone variants and archaeal histone dimer fusions with residue replacements at sites responsible for histone fold dimer:dimer interactions. Almost all of these variants have decreased affinity for DNA. They have also lost the flexibility of the wild type archaeal histones to wrap DNA into a negative or positive supercoil depending on the salt environment; they wrap DNA into positive supercoils under all salt conditions. The histone folds of the archaeal histones, HMfA and HMfB, from Methanothermus fervidus are almost identical, but (HMfA)(2) and (HMfB)(2) homodimers assemble into tetramers with sequence-dependent differences in DNA affinity. By construction and mutagenesis of HMfA+HMfB and HMfB+HMfA histone dimer fusions, the structure formed at the histone dimer:dimer interface within an archaeal histone tetramer has been shown to determine this difference in DNA affinity. Therefore, by regulating the assembly of different archaeal histone dimers into tetramers that have different sequence affinities, the assembly of archaeal histone-DNA complexes could be localized and used to regulate gene expression.     

Mutational analysis of archaeal histone-DNA interactions

Site-specific mutagenesis of the hmfB gene cloned from the archaeon Methanothermus fervidus, followed by expression in Escherichia coli, has been used to generate approximately 90 recombinant (r) variants of the archaeal histone HMfB. The abilities of these variants to form stable archaeal nucleosome-containing complexes with linear pBR322 DNA, and with an 89 bp restriction fragment of this DNA have been determined. Variants that failed to form such complexes, based on negative gel-shift assays, had substitutions at the N terminus or within the alpha1, L1 and L2 regions of the rHMfB histone fold, at sites predicted to be homologous to eucaryal histone fold residues that contact the DNA in the eucaryal nucleosome. Variants that failed to give gel shifts were further assayed for their abilities to facilitate ligase-catalyzed circularization of a linear 88 bp DNA molecule, and to reduce the ellipticity of a DNA solution at 275 nm (theta(275)). Consistent with cooperative but independent sites of DNA binding, a combination of three residue substitutions, one each in alpha1, L1 and L2, was required to generate a rHMfB variant with no detectable DNA binding based on gel shift, circularization and theta(275) reduction assays.     

Histone stoichiometry and DNA circularization in archaeal nucleosomes.

Recombinant (r)HMfB (archaealhistone B fromMethanothermusfervidus) formed complexes with increasing stability with DNA molecules increasing in length from 52 to 100 bp, but not with a 39 bp molecule. By using125I-labeled rHMfB-YY (an rHMfB variant with I31Y and M35Y replacements) and32P-labeled 100 bp DNA, these complexes, designated archaeal nucleosomes, have been shown to contain an archaeal histone tetramer. Consistent with DNA bending and wrapping, addition of DNA ligase to archaeal nucleosomes assembled with 88 and 128 bp DNAs resulted in covalently-closed monomeric circular DNAs which, following histone removal, were positively supercoiled based on their electrophoretic mobilities in the presence of ethidium bromide before and after relaxation by calf thymus topoisomerase I. Ligase addition to mixtures of rHMfB with 53 or 30 bp DNA molecules also resulted in circular DNAs but these were circular dimers and trimers. These short DNA molecules apparently had to be ligated into longer linear multimers for assembly into archaeal nucleosomes and ligation into circles. rHMfB assembled into archaeal nucleosomes at lower histone to DNA ratios with the supercoiled, circular ligation product than with the original 88 bp linear version of this molecule. Archaeal histones are most similar to the globular histone fold region of eukaryal histone H4, and the results reported are consistent with archaeal nucleosomes resembling the structure formed by eukaryal histone (H3+H4)2tetramers.     

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray characterization of the Methanothermus fervidus histones HMfA and HMfB

HMfA and HMfB are histone proteins from the thermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus. They wrap DNA into nucleosome-like structures and appear to represent the basic core histone fold. HMfA was crystallized in space groups P4₂2₁2 and P2₁2₁2₁. HMfB crystallized in space group P2₁2₁2, while a selenomethionine-substituted variant, SeMet-HMfB, yielded crystals in C222₁. In all crystal forms HMfA, HMfB, or SeMet-HMfB may be present as homodimers.     

Both DNA and histone fold sequences contribute to archaeal nucleosome stability.

The roles and interdependence of DNA sequence and archaeal histone fold structure in determining archaeal nucleosome stability and positioning have been determined and quantitated. The presence of four tandem copies of TTTAAAGCCG in the polylinker region of pLITMUS28 resulted in a DNA molecule with increased affinity (DeltaDeltaG of approximately 700 cal mol(-1)) for the archaeal histone HMfB relative to the polylinker sequence, and the dominant, quantitative contribution of the helical repeats of the dinucleotide TA to this increased affinity has been established. The rotational and translational positioning of archaeal nucleosomes assembled on the (TTTAAAGCCG)(4) sequence and on DNA molecules selectively incorporated into archaeal nucleosomes by HMfB have been determined. Alternating A/T- and G/C-rich regions were located where the minor and major grooves, respectively, sequentially faced the archaeal nucleosome core, and identical positioning results were obtained using HMfA, a closely related archaeal histone also from Methanothermus fervidus. However, HMfA did not have similarly high affinities for the HMfB-selected DNA molecules, and domain-swap experiments have shown that this difference in affinity is determined by residue differences in the C-terminal region of alpha-helix 3 of the histone fold, a region that is not expected to directly interact with DNA. Rather this region is thought to participate in forming the histone dimer:dimer interface at the center of an archaeal nucleosome histone tetramer core. If differences in this interface do result in archaeal histone cores with different sequence preferences, then the assembly of alternative archaeal nucleosome tetramer cores could provide an unanticipated and novel structural mechanism to regulate gene expression.     

Archaeal nucleosome positioning sequence from Methanothermus fervidus.

DNA in Methanothermus fervidus, a hyperthermophilic archaeon, is constrained into archaeal nucleosomes in vivo by the archaeal histones HMfA and HMfB. Here, we document the translational and rotational positioning of archaeal nucleosome assembly in vitro by a sequence from the 7S RNA encoding region of the M. fervidus genome. The minor groove of the DNA at the center of the DNA sequence, protected from micrococcal nuclease digestion by incorporation into a positioned archaeal nucleosome, faces away from the archaeal histone core.     

DNA binding and nuclease protection by the HMf histones from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus

The DNA-binding and nuclease-protection properties of the HMf histones from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus have been shown to be consistent with the formation of nucleosome-like structures (NLS). These proteins bind to DNA molecules as short as 20 bp and form complexes that protect DNA fragments from micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion that are 30 bp, ∼ 60 bp and multiples of ∼ 60 bp in length. The sequences of 49 of the ∼ 60-bp DNA fragments protected from MNase digestion by HMfA have been determined and their intrinsic curvatures calculated. A circular permutation gel mobility-shift assay was used to determine directly the curvatures for five of these sequences. HMfA bound to intrinsically curved and noncurved DNAs, but exhibited a slight preference for the model curved DNA in binding competitions with a model noncurved DNA. The results obtained are consistent with the concept that the archaeal NLS is analogous, and possibly homologous, to the central core of the eukaryal nucleosome formed by a histone (H3 + H4)2 tetramer. Received: August 11, 1996 / Accepted: November 12, 1996     

Mutational analysis of differences in thermostability between histones from mesophilic and hyperthermophilic archaea

Amino acid residues responsible for the large difference in thermostability between HMfB and HFoB, archaeal histones from the hyperthermophile Methanothermus fervidus and the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, respectively, have been identified by site-specific mutagenesis. The thermal denaturation of approximately 70 archaeal histone variants has been monitored by circular dichroism, and the data generated were fit to a two-state unfolding model (dimer-->two random coil monomers) to obtain a standard-state (1M) melting temperature for each variant dimer. The results of single-, double-, and triple-residue substitutions reveal that the much higher stability of rHMfB dimers, relative to rHFoB dimers, is conferred predominantly by improved intermolecular hydrophobic interactions near the center of the histone dimer core and by additional favorable ion pairs on the dimer surface.     

Histones and nucleosomes in Archaea and Eukarya: a comparative analysis

Archaeal histones from mesophilic, thermophilic, and hyperthermophilic members of the Euryarchaeota have primary sequences, the histone fold, tertiary structures, and dimer formation in common with the eukaryal nucleosome core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Archaeal histones form nucleoprotein complexes in vitro and in vivo, designated archaeal nucleosomes, that contain histone tetramers and protect approximately 60 base pairs of DNA from nuclease digestion. Based on the sequence and structural homologies and experimental data reviewed here, archaeal nucleosomes appear similar, and may be homologous in evolutionary terms and function, to the structure at the center of the eukaryal nucleosome formed by the histone (H3+H4)₂ tetramer. Received: January 22, 1998 / Accepted: February 16, 1998     

The crystal structure of Aq_328 from the hyperthermophilic bacteria Aquifex aeolicus shows an ancestral histone fold

The structure of Aq_328, an uncharacterized protein from hyperthermophilic bacteria Aquifex aeolicus, has been determined to 1.9 A by using multi-wavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD) phasing. Although the amino acid sequence analysis shows that Aq_328 has no significant similarity to proteins with a known structure and function, the structure comparison by using the Dali server reveals that it: (1) assumes a histone-like fold, and (2) is similar to an ancestral nuclear histone protein (PDB code 1F1E) with z-score 8.1 and RMSD 3.6 A over 124 residues. A sedimentation equilibrium experiment indicates that Aq_328 is a monomer in solution, with an average sedimentation coefficient of 2.4 and an apparent molecular weight of about 20 kDa. The overall architecture of Aq_328 consists of two noncanonical histone domains in tandem repeat within a single chain, and is similar to eukaryotic heterodimer (H2A/H2B and H3/H4) and an archaeal histone heterodimer (HMfA/HMfB). The sequence comparisons between the two histone domains of Aq_328 and six eukaryotic/archaeal histones demonstrate that most of the conserved residues that underlie the Aq_328 architecture are used to build and stabilize the two cross-shaped antiparallel histone domains. The high percentage of salt bridges in the structure could be a factor in the protein's thermostability. The structural similarities to other histone-like proteins, molecular properties, and potential function of Aq_328 are discussed in this paper.     

Molecular components of the archaeal nucleosome

Here we describe the organization of the archaeal nucleosome, in which four archaeal histones are circumscribed by approximately 80 bp of DNA. Through a combination of sequence comparisons, 3D structural studies, site-directed mutagenesis and assays for DNA binding, we have assigned functions to most of the individual residues in the histone fold of the representative archaeal histone rHMfB. By SELEX selection, the sequences of DNA molecules that are most readily bound and wrapped by rHMfB into archaeal nucleosomes in vitro have been identified, and these define DNA structures that position archaeal nucleosome assembly.     

Conserved eukaryotic histone-fold residues substituted into an archaeal histone increase DNA affinity but reduce complex flexibility

Although the archaeal and eukaryotic nucleosome core histones evolved from a common ancestor, conserved lysine residues are present at DNA-binding locations in all four eukaryotic histones that are not present in the archaeal histones. Introduction of lysine residues at the corresponding locations into an archaeal histone, HMfB, generated a variant with increased affinity for DNA that formed more compact complexes with DNA. However, these complexes no longer facilitated the circularization of short DNA molecules and had lost the flexibility to wrap DNA alternatively in either a negative or positive supercoil.     

Archaeal histone selection of nucleosome positioning sequences and the procaryotic origin of histone-dependent genome evolution

Archaeal histones and the eucaryal (eucaryotic) nucleosome core histones have almost identical histone folds. Here, we show that DNA molecules selectively incorporated by rHMfB (recombinant archaeal histone B from Methanothermus fervidus) into archaeal nucleosomes from a mixture of approximately 10(14) random sequence molecules contain sequence motifs shown previously to direct eucaryal nucleosome positioning. The dinucleotides GC, AA (=TT) and TA are repeated at approximately 10 bp intervals, with the GC harmonic displaced approximately 5 bp from the AA and TA harmonics [(GCN(3)AA or TA)(n)]. AT and CG were not strongly selected, indicating that TA not equalAT and GC not equalCG in terms of facilitating archaeal nucleosome assembly. The selected molecules have affinities for rHMfB ranging from approximately 9 to 18-fold higher than the level of affinity of the starting population, and direct the positioned assembly of archaeal nucleosomes. Fourier-transform analyses have revealed that AA dinucleotides are much enriched at approximately 10. 1 bp intervals, the helical repeat of DNA wrapped around a nucleosome, in the genomes of Eucarya and the histone-containing Euryarchaeota, but not in the genomes of Bacteria and Crenarchaeota, procaryotes that do not have histones. Facilitating histone packaging of genomic DNA has apparently therefore imposed constraints on genome sequence evolution, and since archaeal histones have no structure in addition to the histone fold, these constraints must result predominantly from histone fold-DNA contacts. Based on the three-domain universal phylogeny, histones and histone-dependent genome sequence evolution most likely evolved after the bacterial-archaeal divergence but before the archaeal-eucaryal divergence, and were subsequently lost in the Crenarchaeota. However, with lateral gene transfer, the first histone fold could alternatively have evolved after the archaeal-eucaryal divergence, early in either the euryarchaeal or eucaryal lineages.     

Structure of the C-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L7/L12 from Escherichia coli at 1.7 A

The structure of a C-terminal fragment of the ribosomal protein L7/L12 from Escherichia coli has been refined using crystallographic data to 1.7 A resolution. The R-value is 17.4%. Six residues at the N terminus are too disordered in the structure to be localized. These residues are probably part of a hinge in the complete L7/L12 molecule. The possibility that a 2-fold crystallographic axis is a molecular 2-fold axis is discussed. A patch of invariant residues on the surface of the dimer is probably involved in functional interactions with elongation factors.     

Histone H2B mutations in inner region affect ubiquitination, centromere function, silencing and chromosome segregation

The reiterated nature of histone genes has hampered genetic approach to dissect the role of histones in chromatin dynamics. We here report isolation of three temperature-sensitive (ts) Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains, containing amino-acid substitutions in the sole histone H2B gene (htb1+). The mutation sites reside in the highly conserved, non-helical residues of H2B, which are implicated in DNA-protein or protein-protein interactions in the nucleosome. In the allele of htb1-72, the substitution (G52D) occurs at the DNA binding loop L1, causing disruption of the gene silencing in heterochromatic regions and lagging chromosomes in anaphase. In another allele htb1-223 (P102L) locating in the junction between alpha3 and alphaC, the mutant residue is in contact with H2A and other histones, leading to structural aberrations in the central centromere chromatin and unequal chromosome segregation in anaphase. The third allele htb1-442 (E34K) near alpha1 displayed little defect. Evidence is provided that monoubiquitinated H2B is greatly unstable in P102L mutant, possibly owing to proteasome-independent destruction or enhanced deubiquitination. Histone H2B thus plays an important role in centromere/kinetochore formation.     

Mobile histone tails in nucleosomes. Assignments of mobile segments and investigations of their role in chromatin folding

The 13C NMR spectrum of isolated nucleosome core particles contains many sharp resonances, including resonances of alpha- and beta-carbons, indicating that certain terminal segments of histones rich in basic residues are highly mobile (Hilliard, R. R., Jr., Smith, R. M., and Rill, R. L. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 5992-5998). Specific histone termini can be removed sequentially from nucleosome core particles by mild treatment with alpha-chymotrypsin or chymotrypsin plus trypsin (Rosenberg, N. L., Smith. R. M., and Rill, R. L. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 12375-12383). Comparisons of the 13C NMR spectra of native and several partially proteolyzed core particles indicated that a minimum of residues 1-20 of H3 and 1-11 and 118-128 of H2a are contained in mobile segments of native cores. H4 did not appear to contribute to the resonances from mobile histone segments, but a possible contribution of H2b residues 1-16 could not be ruled out. The 13C NMR spectra of oligonucleosomes containing and lacking lysine-rich histones (H1, H5) were similar to each other and to that of native nucleosome cores both when the oligonucleosomes were in an extended conformation at low ionic strength and when they were in a more compact conformation at higher ionic strength. This similarity suggests that histones H1 and H5 must be largely immobilized upon chromatin binding and that the segments of core histones that are mobile in isolated nucleosome cores are not strongly bound to adjacent linker regions in intact chromatin, and are not immobilized by compaction to the degree achieved in 50 mM phosphate buffer.     

Two Arginine Residues Suppress the Flexibility of Nucleosomal DNA in the Canonical Nucleosome Core

The dynamics of nucleosomes containing either canonical H3 or its centromere-specific variant CENP-A were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. The simulations showed that the histone cores were structurally stable during simulation periods of 100 ns and 50 ns, while DNA was highly flexible at the entry and exit regions and partially dissociated from the histone core. In particular, approximately 20–25 bp of DNA at the entry and exit regions of the CENP-A nucleosome exhibited larger fluctuations than DNA at the entry and exit regions of the H3 nucleosome. Our detailed analysis clarified that this difference in dynamics was attributable to a difference in two basic amino acids in the αN helix; two arginine (Arg) residues in H3 were substituted by lysine (Lys) residues at the corresponding sites in CENP-A. The difference in the ability to form hydrogen bonds with DNA of these two residues regulated the flexibility of nucleosomal DNA at the entry and exit regions. Our exonuclease III assay consistently revealed that replacement of these two Arg residues in the H3 nucleosome by Lys enhanced endonuclease susceptibility, suggesting that the DNA ends of the CENP-A nucleosome are more flexible than those of the H3 nucleosome. This difference in the dynamics between the two types of nucleosomes may be important for forming higher order structures in different phases.