ClpB/Hsp100 proteins and heat stress tolerance in plants

High-temperature stress can disrupt cellular proteostasis, resulting in the accumulation of insoluble protein aggregates. For survival under stressful conditions, it is important for cells to maintain a pool of native soluble proteins by preventing and/or dissociating these aggregates. Chaperones such as GroEL/GroES (Hsp60/Hsp10) and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (Hsp70/Hsp40/nucleotide exchange factor) help cells minimize protein aggregation. Protein disaggregation is accomplished by chaperones belonging to the Caseinolytic Protease (Clp) family of proteins. ClpB/Hsp100 proteins are strikingly ubiquitous and are found in bacteria, yeast and multi-cellular plants. The expression of these proteins is regulated by heat stress (HS) and developmental cues. Bacteria and yeast contain one and two forms of ClpB proteins, respectively. Plants possess multiple forms of these proteins that are localized to different cellular compartments (i.e. cytoplasm/nucleus, chloroplast or mitochondria). Overwhelming evidence suggests that ClpB/Hsp100 proteins play decisive roles in cell adaptation to HS. Mutant bacteria and yeast cells lacking active ClpB/Hsp100 proteins are critically sensitive to high-temperature stress. Likewise, Arabidopsis, maize and rice mutants lacking cytoplasmic ClpB proteins are very sensitive to heat. In this study, we present the structural and functional attributes of plant ClpB forms.     

Integrating the cell stress response: a new view of molecular chaperones as immunological and physiological homeostatic regulators

The response of cells to stress was first documented in the 1960s and 1970s and the molecular nature of the families of proteins that subserve this vital response, the molecular chaperones, were identified and subjected to critical study in the period from the late 1980s. This resulted in the rapidly advancing new field of protein folding and its role in cellular function. Emerging at the same time, but initially largely ignored, were reports that molecular chaperones could be released by cells and exist on the outer plasma membrane or in the body fluids. These secreted molecular chaperones were found to have intercellular signalling functions. There is now a growing body of evidence to support the hypothesis that molecular chaperones have properties ascribed to the Roman god Janus, the god of gates, doors, beginnings and endings, whose two faces point in different directions. Molecular chaperones appear to have one set of key functions within the cell and, potentially, a separate set of functions when they exist on the cell surface or in the various fluid phases of the body. Thus, it is a likely hypothesis that secreted molecular chaperones act as an additional level of homeostatic control possibly linking cellular stress to physiological systems such as the immune system. This review concentrates on three key molecular chaperones: Hsp10, Hsp60 and the Hsp70 family for which most information is available. An important consideration is the role that these proteins may play in human disease and in the treatment of human disease. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Complex dynamics of chaperone-protein interactions under cellular stress

We present a model of a generalizable but minimalistic network based on the properties of interactions between proteins, molecular chaperones (e.g., Hsp 70, BiP) and ATP inside cells and subcellular components such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The dynamics of chaperone-dependent protein folding and misfolding in the cell can be modeled mathematically as a “predator-prey” problem, which can then be used to analyze the behavior of the system under conditions simulating stress (e.g., cardiac ischemia). We have tested this model under normal physiological and diseased conditions (e.g., ischemia as simulated by ATP depletion) and analyzed the effects of induction of chaperones (e.g., heat shock, tunicamycin) and inhibition of the degradative pathway (e.g., proteasome inhibition) on this model. Simulation gave the following results: (1) Under normal physiological conditions (basal levels of ATP, chaperone, and initially misfolded proteins), as expected, the model predicts the stable production of correctly folded proteins. (2) A threshold of ATP levels exists below which the system tends toward increasing degrees of complex behavior. When ATP levels are just above this threshold, the system is highly vulnerable to sudden, brief drops in ATP levels such as may occur in the setting of acute ischemia: bursts of oscillations continue even when ATP levels revert to the threshold. However, if ATP levels are rapidly increased to levels considerably above the threshold, the system becomes stable again. (3) Up to 10-fold increases in chaperone levels, such as those that occur under conditions of prior heat shock or (in the case of ER chaperones) tunicamycin treatment, did not affect the behavior of the system under basal conditions, nor did it affect the tendency to complex behavior in the setting of ATP depletion. It did, however, shorten the recovery period of the system after chaotic-type oscillations were induced by acute ATP depletion. (4) Blocking the degradative pathway for misfolded proteins (e.g., proteasome inhibition) predisposes the system toward instability in the setting of ATP depletion by changing the ATP threshold at which bursts of oscillations occur. These results support the hypothesis that there are distinct thresholds for ATP, chaperones, and degradative activity, outside which cellular protein folding dynamics become unstable. They also suggest that an important mechanism by which chaperone induction protects cells from subsequent stress is by limiting the tendency to instability after an insult (e.g., acute myocardial ischemia or acute tubular injury to the kidney). Thus, the model may be useful for understanding cell and tissue tolerance to stress and injury.     

Inhibition of cell death by a novel 16.2 kD heat shock protein predominantly via Hsp90 mediated lipid rafts stabilization and Akt activation pathway

AlphaB-crystallin homology, heat stress induction and chaperone activity suggested that a previously encloned gene product is a novel small heat shock protein (Hsp16.2). Suppression of Hsp16.2 by siRNA sensitized cells to hydrogen peroxide or taxol induced cell-death. Over-expressing of Hsp16.2 protected cells against stress stimuli by inhibiting cytochrome c release from the mitochondria, nuclear translocation of AIF and endonuclease G, and caspase 3 activation. Recombinant Hsp16.2 protected mitochondrial membrane potential against calcium induced collapse in vitro indicating that Hsp16.2 stabilizes mitochondrial membrane systems. Hsp16.2 formed self-aggregates and bound to Hsp90. Inhibition of Hsp90 by geldanamycin diminished the cytoprotective effect of Hsp16.2 indicating that this effect was Hsp90-mediated. Hsp16.2 over-expression increased lipid rafts formation as demonstrated by increased cell surface labeling with fluorescent cholera toxin B, and increased Akt phosphorylation. The inhibition of PI-3-kinase—Akt pathway by LY-294002 or wortmannin significantly decreased the protective effect of the Hsp16.2. These data indicate that the over-expression of Hsp16.2 inhibits cell death via the stabilization of mitochondrial membrane system, activation of Hsp90, stabilization of lipid rafts and by the activation of PI-3-kinase—Akt cytoprotective pathway.     

Small Heat Shock Proteins Protect Electron Transport in Chloroplasts and Mitochondria During Stress

Evidence indicates that small heat-shock proteins (Hsps) areinvolved in stress tolerance, but the specific cell componentsor functions that small Hsps protect or repair are mostly unidentified.We recently showed that the chloroplast small Hsps of higherplants (1) are produced in response to many environmental stresses(e.g., heat, oxidative, and high-light stress); and (2) protect(but do not repair) photosynthetic electron transport in vitroduring stress, specifically by interacting with the oxygen-evolving-complexproteins of Photosystem II (PSII) within the thylakoid lumen.However, in vivo evidence of the importance of these Hsps tophotosynthetic stress tolerance is lacking. Here we report positiverelationships between chloroplast small Hsp production and PSIIthermotolerance in (1) a heattolerant genotype of Agrostis palustris(bentgrass) and a heat sensitive genotype which lacks one ormore chloroplast small Hsps produced by the tolerant genotype;(2) ecotypes of Chenopodium album (lambs quarters) from thenorthern vs. southern U.S. (New York vs. Georgia); and (3) nineLycopersicon (tomato) cultivars/species differing in heat tolerance.These in vivo results are consistent with our previous in vitroobservations and indicate that genetic variation in productionof the chloroplast small Hsp is an important determinant ofphotosynthetic and, thereby, whole-plant thermotolerance. Recently,we showed that the mitochondrial small Hsp of plants protectsrespiratory (specifically Complex I) electron transport in vitroduring heat stress, and here we present evidence for previouslyunidentified small Hsps in mitochondria of mammal (rat) cellswhich also protect Complex I during heat stress. These resultssuggest that the mitochondrial small Hsps, like the small chloroplastHsps, are general stress proteins that contribute significantlyto cell and organismal stress tolerance.     

The hsp110 and Grp1 70 stress proteins: newly recognized relatives of the Hsp70s

Both the Grp170 and Hsp110 families represent relatively conserved and distinct sets of stress proteins, within a more diverse category that also includes the Hsp70s. All of these families are found in a wide variety of organisms from yeasts to humans. Although Hsp110s or Grp170s are not Hsp70s any more than Hsp70s are Hsp110s or Grp170s, it is still reasonable to refer to this combination of related families as the Hsp70 superfamily based on arguments discussed above and since no obvious prokaryotic Hsp110 or Grp170 has yet been identified. These proteins are related to their counterparts in the Hsp70/Grp78 family of eukaryotic stress proteins but are characterized by significantly larger molecular weights. The members of the Grp170 family are characterized by C-terminal ER retention sequences and are ER localized in yeasts and mammals. As a Grp, Grp170 is recognized to be coregulated with other major Grps by a well-known set of stress conditions, sometimes referred to as the unfolded protein response (Kozutsumi et al 1988; Nakaki et al 1989). The Hsp110 family members are localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm and, with other major Hsps, are also coregulated by a specific set of stress conditions, most notably including hyperthermic exposures. Hsp110 is sometimes called Hsp105, although it would be preferable to have a uniform term. The large Hsp70-like proteins are structurally similar to the Hsp70s but differ from them in important ways. In both the Grp170 and Hspl10 families, there is a long loop structure that is interposed between the peptide-binding ,-domain and the alpha-helical lid. In the Hsp110 family and Grp170, there are differing degrees of expansion in the alpha-helical domain and the addition of a C-terminal loop. This gives the appearance of much larger lid domains for Hsp110 and Grp170 compared with Hsp70. Both Hsp110 and Grp170 families have relatively conserved short sequences in the alpha-helical domain in the lid, which are conserved motifs in numerous proteins (we termed these motifs Magic and TedWylee as discussed earlier). The structural differences detailed in this review result in functional differences between the large (Grp170 and Hspl10) members of the Hsp70 superfamily, the most distinctive being an increased ability of these proteins to bind (hold) denatured polypeptides compared with Hsc70, perhaps related to the enlarged C-terminal helical domain. However, there is also a major difference between these large stress proteins; Hsp110 does not bind ATP in vitro, whereas Grp170 binds ATP avidly. The role of the Grp170 and Hsp110 stress proteins in cellular physiology is not well understood. Overexpression of Hsp110 in cultured mammalian cells increases thermal tolerance. Grp170 binds to secreted proteins in the ER and may be cooperatively involved in folding these proteins appropriately. These roles are similar to those of the Hsp70 family members, and, therefore, the question arises as to the differential roles played by the larger members of the superfamily. We have discussed evidence that the large members of the superfamily cooperate with members of the Hsp70 family, and these chaperones probably interact with a large number of chaperones and cochaperones in their functional activities. The fundamental point is that Hsp110 is found in conjunction with Hsp70 in the cytoplasm (and nucleus) and Grp170 is found in conjunction with78 in tha ER in every eucaryotic cell examined from yeast to humans. This would strongly argue that Hsp110 Grp170 exhibit functions in eucaryotes not effectively performed by Hsp70s or Grp78, respectively. Of interest in this respect is the observation that all Hsp110s loss of function or deletion mutants listed in the Drosophila deletion project database are lethal. The important task for the future is to determine the roles these conserved molecular chaperones play in normal and physiologically stressed cells.     

Hsp70 translocates to the nuclei and nucleoli, binds to XRCC1 and PARP-1, and protects HeLa cells from single-strand DNA breaks

For many years, there has been uncertainty concerning the reason for Hsp70 translocation to the nucleus and nucleolus. Herein, we propose that Hsp70 translocates to the nucleus and nucleoli in order to participate in pathways related to the protection of the nucleoplasmic DNA or ribosomal DNA from single-strand breaks. The absence of Hsp70 in HeLa cells, via Hsp70 gene silencing (knockdown), indicated the essential role of Hsp70 in DNA integrity. Therefore, HeLa Hsp70 depleted cells were very sensitive in heat treatment and their DNA breaks were multiple compared to that of control HeLa cells. The molecular mechanism with which Hsp70 performs its role at the level of nucleus and nucleolus during stress was examined. Hsp70 co-localizes with PARP1 in the nucleus/nucleoli as was observed in confocal studies and binds to the BCRT domain of PARP1 as was revealed with protein–protein interaction assays. It was also found that Hsp70 binds simultaneously to XRCC1 and PARP-1, indicating that Hsp70 function takes place at the level of DNA repair and possibly at the base excision repair system. Making a hypothetical model, we have suggested that Hsp70 is the molecule that binds and interrelates with PARP1 creating the repair proteins simultaneously, such as XRCC1, at the single-strand DNA breaks. Our data partially clarify a previously unrecognized cellular response to heat stress. Finally, we can speculate that Hsp70 plays a role in the quality and integrity of DNA. Outlining prior scientific knowledge on the subject and novel information: The role of Hsp70 translocation to the nucleus and nucleolus during heat stress has been nearly unknown. It has been proposed that this biological phenomenon is correlated to Hsp70-chaperoning activity. Furthermore, some previous observations in yeast have revealed that Rad9 complexes—Rad9 being the prototype DNA-damage checkpoint gene—contain Ssa1 and or Ssa2 chaperone proteins, both reconstituting the functions of the corresponding Hsp70 in mammalian cells. Here, we propose that Hsp70 translocates to the nuclei/nucleoli during heat stress, binds to PARP-1 and/or XRCC1, and protects HeLa cells from increased single-strand DNA breaks.     

Measuring the secretion of heat shock proteins from cells

Heat shock proteins have been shown to be secreted from a number of cell types. Necrotic cells release heat shock proteins in a passive manner, whereas we, and others, have shown that viable cells secrete Hsp70 and Hsp60 through an active mechanism involving lysosomal vesicles and lipid rafts. This release of Hsp70 and Hsp60 is regulated, for example by being increased by elevated temperature. This article outlines procedures, using Hsp70 as the example, to: ensure the status of cells (viable, apoptotic or necrotic); identify the heat shock protein secreted; and quantify the secreted protein. Hsp70 has previously been quantified by ELISA, but newer methods are now being adopted, such as BIAcore and bead-based assays for use by FACS. These methods have the advantages of being more sensitive and requiring less sample than ELISA. The BIAcore has the potential to analyse Hsp70 ligands and provide affinity constants. The FACS bead assay system can be used to run multiplex assays.     

Water-restraint stress enhances methamphetamine-induced cardiotoxicity

Methamphetamine (MAP) and stress both cause a variety of cardiovascular problems. Stress also increases stimulant drug-seeking or drug-taking behavior by both humans and animals. In addition to the physiological effects on circulation, metabolism, and excretion, stress affects subject's responses to stimulant drugs such as MAP. However, the mechanisms underlying the drug–stress interactions remain unknown. In the present study, we assessed the effects of stress on myocardial responses to MAP in mice. Mice were injected with MAP (30 mg/kg) immediately before exposure to water-restraint stress (WRS), which has often been used as a stressor in animal experiments. The combination of MAP with WRS produced a significant increase (p < 0.01) in the leakage of proteins specific to myocardial damage and the levels of cytokines IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10. The histological findings indicated the possibility that a combination of MAP with WRS induced cardiac myocytolysis. We also examined the expression of heat shock proteins (Hsps), which have cardioprotective effects. Administration of MAP alone significantly stimulated the RNA expressions of Hsp32, 60, 70, and 90 and the protein Hsp70 in cardiac muscles, whereas the expressions due to WRS or MAP plus WRS were not increased. These results reveal the fact that exposure to WRS depresses the induction of Hsps, in particular Hsp70, due to MAP injection, following to enhance MAP-induced myocardial damage. We believe that interactions between MAP and severe stress, including environmental temperature, affect the induction of Hsps, following to susceptibility of hosts to cardiotoxicity due to the stimulant drug.     

Variability of the healthy human proteome

The aim of this review is to analyze results of studies on characteristics of protein variability and diversity of posttranslational modifications of proteins in healthy humans. Numerous studies have demonstrated that a proteomic profile is characterized by significant intra- and inter-individual variability, and quite often natural (“normal”) variability of some proteins can be comparable to changes observed in pathological processes. Results obtained by our research group have demonstrated high intra-individual variability of serum low-molecular subproteome of healthy volunteers, certified by a special medial committee (the coefficient of variation (CV) of 42.6%). The proteins characterized by high variability under normal conditions (e.g. haptoglobin — 0–40 mg/ml; lysozyme — 0.01–0.1 mg/ml; C-reactive protein — 0.01–0.3 mg/ml) cannot be considered as potential biomarkers of diseases. On the contrary, proteins and peptides characterized by insignificant dispersion in healthy population (such as albumin ( CV = 9%); transferrin-(CV = 14%); C3c complement (CV = 17%), α-1 acid glycoprotein (CV = 21%), α-2-macroglobulin (CV = 20%); transthyretin fragment (CV = 28.3%) and α2-HS-glycoprotein βchain (CV = 29.7%)) can provide valuable information about the state of health. Thus, studies of plasticity in the proteomic profiles of healthy humans will help to correct reference intervals used in clinical proteomics.     

Bag1-Hsp70 mediates a physiological stress signalling pathway that regulates Raf-1/ERK and cell growth

Survival after stress requires the precise orchestration of cell-signalling events to ensure that biosynthetic processes are alerted and cell survival pathways are initiated. Here we show that Bag1, a co-chaperone for heat-shock protein 70 (Hsp70), coordinates signals for cell growth in response to cell stress, by downregulating the activity of Raf-1 kinase. Raf-1 and Hsp70 compete for binding to Bag1, such that Bag1 binds to and activates Raf-1, subsequently activating the downstream extracellular signal-related kinases (ERKs). When levels of Hsp70 are elevated after heat shock, or in cells conditionally overexpressing Hsp70, Bag1-Raf-1 is displaced by Bag1-Hsp70, and DNA synthesis is arrested. Mutants Bag1C204A and Bag1E208A, which cannot bind Hsp70, constitutively activate Raf-1/ERK kinases but are unaffected by Hsp70; consequently neither Bag1-Raf-1 nor DNA synthesis is negatively affected during heat shock. Likewise, mutants Hsp70F245S, Hsp70R262W and Hsp70L282R, which retain chaperone activity but do not bind to Bag1, fail to repress Bag1 activation of Raf-1/ERK kinase. We propose that Bag1 functions in the heat-shock response to coordinate cell growth signals and mitogenesis, and that Hsp70 functions as a sensor in stress signalling.     

Molecular analysis of Hsp70 mechanisms in plants and their function in response to stress

Studying the strategies of improving abiotic stress tolerance is quite imperative and research under this field will increase our understanding of response mechanisms to abiotic stress such as heat. The Hsp70 is an essential regulator of protein having the tendency to maintain internal cell stability like proper folding protein and breakdown of unfolded proteins. Hsp70 holds together protein substrates to help in movement, regulation, and prevent aggregation under physical and or chemical pressure. However, this review reports the molecular mechanism of heat shock protein 70 kDa (Hsp70) action and its structural and functional analysis, research progress on the interaction of Hsp70 with other proteins and their interaction mechanisms as well as the involvement of Hsp70 in abiotic stress responses as an adaptive defense mechanism.     

Mild heat stress at a young age in<Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> leads to increased Hsp70 synthesis after stress exposure later in life

In a number of animal species it has been shown that exposure to low levels of stress at a young age has a positive effect on stress resistance later in life, and on longevity. The positive effects have been attributed to the activation of defence/cleaning systems (heat shock proteins (Hsps), antioxidases, DNA repair) or to effects of a changed metabolic rate, or both. We investigated the effect of mild stress exposures early in life on Hsp70 synthesis after a harder stress exposure later in life in five isofemale lines ofDrosophila melanogaster. Female flies were either exposed to repeated bouts of mild heat stress (3 h at 34‡C) at a young age (days 2, 4 and 6 post-eclosion) or held under standard laboratory conditions. At 16 and 32 days of adult age, respectively, flies were exposed to a high temperature treatment known to induce Hsp70 in the investigated species (1 h at 37‡C). Thereafter, the inducible Hsp70 levels were measured. Our data show a tendency towards increased Hsp70 synthesis with increased age for both ’mild stress’ and ’no stress’ flies. Moreover, the results show that flies exposed to mild stress at a young age synthesized more Hsp70 upon induction, compared to control flies, and that this difference was accentuated at 32 days compared to 16 days of age. Thus, bouts of mild heat stress at a young age impact on the physiological stress response system later in life. This may be caused by an increased ability to react to future stresses. Alternatively, the mild stress exposure at a young age may actually have caused cellular damages increasing the need for Hsp70 levels after stress exposure later in life. The importance of an Hsp70 upregulation (throughout life) in explaining the phenomenon of hormesis is discussed, together with alternative hypotheses, and suggestions for further studies.     

Heat shock response and acute lung injury

All cells respond to stress through the activation of primitive, evolutionarily conserved genetic programs that maintain homeostasis and assure cell survival. Stress adaptation, which is known in the literature by a myriad of terms, including tolerance, desensitization, conditioning, and reprogramming, is a common paradigm found throughout nature, in which a primary exposure of a cell or organism to a stressful stimulus (e.g., heat) results in an adaptive response by which a second exposure to the same stimulus produces a minimal response. More interesting is the phenomenon of cross-tolerance, by which a primary exposure to a stressful stimulus results in an adaptive response whereby the cell or organism is resistant to a subsequent stress that is different from the initial stress (i.e., exposure to heat stress leading to resistance to oxidant stress). The heat shock response is one of the more commonly described examples of stress adaptation and is characterized by the rapid expression of a unique group of proteins collectively known as heat shock proteins (also commonly referred to as stress proteins). The expression of heat shock proteins is well described in both whole lungs and in specific lung cells from a variety of species and in response to a variety of stressors. More importantly, in vitro data, as well as data from various animal models of acute lung injury, demonstrate that heat shock proteins, especially Hsp27, Hsp32, Hsp60, and Hsp70 have an important cytoprotective role during lung inflammation and injury.