Skin donors and human skin allografts: evaluation of an 11-year practice and discard in a referral tissue bank

The Saint Louis hospital tissue bank provides skin allografts to pediatric and adult burn units in the Paris area. The aim of this study was to analyze our activity during the last 11 years focusing on the reasons for skin discard. Skin is procured solely from the back of the body, which is divided into 10 zones that are harvested and processed separately. This retrospective study included all skin donors harvested between June 2002 and June 2013, representing a total of 336 donors and 2770 zones. The donors were multiorgan heart-beating donors in 91 % of cases (n = 307). The main reason for discarding harvested skin was microbial contamination, detected in 99 donors (29 %). Most contaminants were of low pathogenicity. Other reasons for discard included positive serologic tests for 2 donors [17 zones (0.61 %)], unsuitable physical skin characteristics for 3 zones (0.11 %), the donor’s medical history for 53 zones (1.91 %), and technical issues with processing or distribution for 61 zones (2.2 %). In our experience, microbial contamination continues to be the main reason for discarding potential skin allografts. However, discards are limited by separate harvesting and processing of multiple zones in each donor.     

The effectiveness of bone banking in Central Serbia: audit of the first seven years

We analyzed the incidence and predisposing factors for overall discard rate after retrieval of 295 femoral head allografts. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the quality system of institutional bone banking and to ensure that we can provide high standard allografts with low infection rate. Audit of bone banking was conducted on 295 donors and 180 recipients. Of the 295 donated femoral heads 77 were discarded, giving an overall discard rate of 26.1 %. At retrieval, 37 allografts were positive, giving an overall contamination rate of 12.54 %. The organism most commonly identified was Staphylococcus species. Seven (2.37 %) of the 295 allografts failed the blood screening tests. Twelve allografts (4.06 %) were discarded because of suspected damage of the packaging or disuse during surgery. Due to donor death or inability to perform serology retests, 21 (7.11 %) allografts were discarded. In the postoperative survey an infection rate of 2.22 % was found. After 7 years of bone banking, our results show that overall discard rate and allograft related infection rate are in accordance with the international standards. The leading cause of allograft discarding was bacterial contamination influenced by the surgical team. We suggest stringent aseptic allograft handling during harvesting and thawing within highly concentrated antibiotic solution to reduce a possibility of its contamination.     

Tissue banking in Mexico

Introduction: Here, we describe our Tissue Banking experiences of 4 years of activity in Mexico. Methods: Data of allografts provided by our Bank and bone retrievals performed by our teams between February of 2001 and August of 2004 were included. Results: There were 100 bone donors, a total of 1107 tissues were obtained with an average of 11 tissues by retrieval, samples from all tissues were obtained during retrieval and cultured for bacterial contamination, 250 tissues were positives to bacterial growth with an average of 22.58% of bacterial contamination of tissue by retrieval. A total of 4493 allografts were provided and were utilized in 3643 patients. The allografts were used mainly by orthopedic surgeons (62%) and dentists (30%). The most used allografts were morcellized cancellous bone 31%, pulverized 25% and chips of cancellous bone 20%. Among orthopedic patients the most frequent procedures were related with spine degenerative diseases 39.09%, followed by non-pathological fractures and its complications 28.67% and bone tumors and cystic bone lesions 11.59%. Conclusions: Sustained increase of allograft utilization in Mexico reflects a great necessity for them in our country. The increase in public awareness about tissue donation has allowed an increase in tissue donations and retrievals.     

Bacterial infection transmitted by human tissue allograft transplantation

Bacterial contamination of tissue allografts obtained from cadaveric donors has been a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in recipients. Recent cases of fatal and nonfatal bacterial infections in recipients of contaminated articular cartilage (distal femur) and tendon allografts have called attention to the importance of avoiding tissue donors suspected of carrying infectious disease, of not processing donated tissue carrying virulent bacteria, the occurrence of falsely negative final sterility tests, and the need to sterilize tissues. These cases demonstrated that contamination can arise from an infected donor, during tissue removal from cadaveric donors, from the processing environment, and from contaminated supplies and reagents used during processing. Final sterility testing can be unreliable, especially when antibiotics remain on tissues. There is an increasing need for control of microbial contamination in tissue banks, and sterilization of tissue allografts should be recommended whenever possible.     

Viability of cryopreserved human skin allografts: effects of transport media and cryoprotectant

Human skin allografts can be preserved by different methods. In our clinical practice, human skin allografts are harvested on multi-organ and tissue donors, transferred at +4°C in Ringer Lactate, cryopreserved with 15% Glycerol and held in the vapor phase of a liquid nitrogen freezer until delivery to the burn center. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the impact of transport medium and cryoprotectant on the viability of human skin allografts. For this purpose, we compared skin samples harvested from 19 multi-organ and tissue donors with two different transport media and two different cryoprotectants. Viability was assessed by the MTT assay after harvesting at laboratory reception, during storage (at +4°C) at day 2 and day 7, and after cryopreservation and thawing. Histopathological analysis was performed for each MTT assay. Results indicate that, when stored at +4°C, skin retains more viability with RPMI, whereas Glycerol and DMSO are equivalent cryoprotectants regardless of the transport medium. In conclusion, our protocol could be improved by the utilization of RPMI as transport medium.     

The Procurement Team as a Factor of Bone Allograft Contamination

We studied the effect of the procurement team on the risk of contamination in 270 large bone allografts retrieved from 53 non-living donors under strictly aseptic conditions.The overall contamination rate was 8.1%. When the procurement team was constituted by three or less members the contamination rate was 5.6%, while if there were four or more members the rate was 12.9%; this difference was significant in the statistical analysis.We conclude that a procurement team constituted by three or less trained members is a determinant factor in decreasing the bacterial contamination rate of bone allografts.     

Processing of cardiovascular allografts: effectiveness of European Homograft Bank (EHB) antimicrobial treatment (cool decontamination protocol with low concentration of antibiotics)

To assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial treatment by using cool decontamination protocol with low concentration of antibiotics during processing of cardiovascular allografts, 948 allografts processed during a 2-year period were analysed. Five hundred and fourty one donors aged <62 years were classified in: multiorgan donors (MOD) with non-transplantable hearts; recipients of cardiac transplantation (RHT); and non-beating heart cadavers with a warm ischemic time of less than 6 h (NBHD). During processing three samples for bacteriology testing were taken A (sampling before decontamination); B (sampling after decontamination); C (sampling on the final product). Samples A were positive in 348 cases (36.4%), respectively 36% for MOD, 21.6% for RHT and 78.1% for NBHD. All the allografts were immersed in a cocktail of four antibiotics at 4 °C. After exposure to antibiotics the rate of decontamination of those with A positive was 90.4, 92.5, 82.5% respectively for MOD, RHT, NBHD. At the end of processing, 57 allografts (6%) were positive in B and/or C, 15 allografts remained contaminated with the same bacteria as in A, 42 were contaminated during processing. The overall rate of sterility in the end of processing is 94% and for each group this is: 95.4% for MOD, 96.8% for RHT and 86.3% for NBHD. Analysis shows that there is no influence of time of exposure in AB in the rate of decontamination for MOD and RHT. The most predominant germ in contamination is Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (53.4% alone, 8.9% with other bacteria). 83.3% of MOD; 88.5% of RHT were contaminated with one germ, while 40.4% of NBHD were contaminated with more than one. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Banking of the human heart valves and the arteries at the European homograft bank (EHB) – Overview of a 14-year activity in this International Association in Brussels<Superscript>*</Superscript>

Processing of the human heart valves and arteries has been carried out at the European Homograft Bank (EHB) in Brussels since 1989 and 1991, respectively. Heart valve donors of 0–65 years were classified in (1) Beating heart donors (BHD), of which recipients of heart transplantation (RHT) and multiorgan donors (MOD) after brain death, and (2) non-beating heart donors (NBHD) with warm ischaemic time (WIT) of less then 6 h. Past history of the donors has been checked for malignant and chronic diseases, as well as biology for transmissible and infectious diseases. Perfect collaboration has been established with the transplant coordinators and transplant teams of the implanting centres. Dissection, decontamination, cryopreservation and storing in fluid nitrogen has been carried out in accordance with the Belgian and European Standards of cardiovascular allografts. During this period, a total of 2.828 hearts, 28 predissected valves and 616 batches of arteries arrived in the EHB. 3.537 valves and 1.137 different arteries were accepted for implantation. The main reasons for tissue rejection were morphology, contamination and cuts during the tissue retrieval or dissection. A huge network of different hospitals in Belgium and elsewhere in Europe and Switzerland were included in this process. Pulmonary allografts were not sent for implantation in the left ventricular outflow tract after 1998, since the early and mid-term results after 76 implantations were disappointing. The number of implanted aortic and pulmonary allografts remains stable from year to year, however the number of the allografts used for Ross operation is still increasing. Since the results of the follow up were disappointing, we still only require the implantation and immediate postoperative results, whereas the follow-up information only for specific study purposes. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Analysis of potential factors affecting allografts contamination at retrieval

The microbiological contamination of retrieved tissues has become a very important topic and it is a critical aspect in the safety of allografts, especially from multi-tissue donors whose tissues are frequently contaminated as a consequence of retrieval. We analysed a total of 10,107 tissues, 8178 musculoskeletal and 1929 cardiovascular tissues, retrieved from 978 multi-tissue donors. Of these, 159 heart-beating donors (HBD) were also organ donors, while the remaining 819 non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) were tissue donors only. A multivariate logistic model was used to determine the factors affecting contamination risk during retrieval. In the model, the dependent variable was the presence/absence of contamination while the covariates included were: gender, type of donor, age of donor, cause of death, previous skin donation, cadaver time, number of people attending the retrieval, number of tissues retrieved. Moreover, a second log-linear model was used to determine the number of strains isolated per tissue. Tissue contamination was statistically correlated with gender, type of donor, cadaver time, number of people attending the retrieval and season. In conclusion, to minimize the risk of bacterial contamination, aseptic techniques should be used at retrieval, with the number of retrieval team members kept to a minimum. In addition, cadaver time should be as short as possible and the donor should be refrigerated within a few hours after death.     

Comparison of contamination of femoral heads and pre-processed bone chips during hip revision arthroplasty

With bone impaction grafting, cancellous bone chips made from allograft femoral heads are impacted in a bone defect, which introduces an additional source of infection. The potential benefit of the use of pre-processed bone chips was investigated by comparing the bacterial contamination of bone chips prepared intraoperatively with the bacterial contamination of pre-processed bone chips at different stages in the surgical procedure. To investigate baseline contamination of the bone grafts, specimens were collected during 88 procedures before actual use or preparation of the bone chips: in 44 procedures intraoperatively prepared chips were used (Group A) and in the other 44 procedures pre-processed bone chips were used (Group B). In 64 of these procedures (32 using locally prepared bone chips and 32 using pre-processed bone chips) specimens were also collected later in the procedure to investigate contamination after use and preparation of the bone chips. In total, 8 procedures had one or more positive specimen(s) (12.5 %). Contamination rates were not significantly different between bone chips prepared at the operating theatre and pre-processed bone chips. In conclusion, there was no difference in bacterial contamination between bone chips prepared from whole femoral heads in the operating room and pre-processed bone chips, and therefore, both types of bone allografts are comparable with respect to risk of infection.     

Assessment of cryopreserved donor skin viability: the experience of the regional tissue bank of Siena

Skin allografts from cadaver donors are an important resource for treating extensive burns, slow-healing wounds and chronic ulcers. A high level of cell viability of cryopreserved allografts is often required, especially in burn surgery, in Italy. Thus, we aimed to determine which conditions enable procurement of highly viable skin in our Regional Skin Bank of Siena. For this purpose, we assessed cell viability of cryopreserved skin allografts procured between 2011 and 2013 from 127 consecutive skin donors, before and after freezing (at day 15, 180, and 365). For each skin donor, we collected data concerning clinical history (age, sex, smoking, phototype, dyslipidemia, diabetes, cause of death), donation process (multi-tissue or multi-organ) and timing of skin procurement (assessment of intervals such as death-harvesting, harvesting-banking, death-banking). All these variables were analysed in the whole case study (127 donors) and in different groups (e.g. multi-organ donors, non refrigerated multi-tissue donors, refrigerated multi-tissue donors) for correlations with cell viability. Our results indicated that cryopreserved skin allografts with higher cell viability were obtained from female, non smoker, heartbeating donors died of cerebral haemorrhage, and were harvested within 2 h of aortic clamping and banked within 12 h of harvesting (13–14 h from clamping). Age, cause of death and dyslipidaemia or diabetes did not appear to influence cell viability. To maintain acceptable cell viability, our skin bank needs to reduce the time interval between harvesting and banking, especially for refrigerated donors.     

Molecular testing of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Klebsiella pneumoniae</Emphasis> contaminating tissue allografts recovered from deceased donors

Microbiological screening of tissue allografts is crucial to prevent the transmission of bacterial and fungal infections to transplant recipients. Klebsiella was the most prevalent and resistant contaminating microorganism observed in our setting in the Iranian Tissue Bank. This study was conducted to determine the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes, antimicrobial resistance patterns of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, and their clonal relationships in allograft materials. K. pneumoniae contaminating bone and other tissue allografts recovered from deceased donors were identified and ESBL isolates were detected using a phenotypic confirmatory method. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the disk diffusion method. Distribution of ESBL genes and molecular typing were performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Repetitive-element (rep-PCR) methods. Of 3828 donated tissues, 51 (1.3%) were found contaminated by K. pneumoniae isolates. Compared to tissue allografts from brain-dead, heart-beating tissue donors, allografts from donors with circulatory cessation were associated with a higher risk of K. pneumoniae contamination [odds ratio (OR), 1.2 (CI 95% 0.9–2.3) (P value < 0.001)]. Half of the isolates produced ESBL, and the rate of susceptibility to cephalosporins was 51%. Among isolates, 22 (43.1%) harbored CTX-M, 31 (60.8%) SHV, and 9 (17.6%) harbored TEM types. The rep-dendrogram indicated that clones having identical or related strains with a similar antibiotype were isolated in the same period. This study provides evidence that a single clone of K. pneumoniae contaminated tissue allografts recovered from many different donors. A single clone found on tissues from several donors suggests contamination of tissues from a single source such as the tissue recovery process and environment. Genomic DNA testing and clonality of contaminating bacteria using molecular methods can focus the epidemiologic investigation on the tissue allograft recovery process including a search for contamination of the tissue recovery room environment, recovery staff, recovery equipment, reagents, solutions and supplies.     

Regional program for bone allograft harvesting following multiorgan procurement in Pomeranian Academy of Medicine in Szczecin

In Poland, up to 1999, the bones for allograft preparations had been procured only in mortuaries of forensic medicine departments. The increasing demand for bone transplantations greatly exceeds the supply resulting in a long waiting time for bone allografts. In November 1999, for the first time in Poland, the group of orthopedic surgeons from the Pomeranian Academy of Medicine started the regional program for bone harvesting following vascularized organ procurements. The aim of this paper is to present the technical details and limitations of bone harvesting that occurred in 10 out of 25 multiorgan procurements. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Bacterial Contamination of Tissue Allografts – Experiences of the Donor Tissue Bank of Victoria

The aim of this study is to report the experience of the Donor Tissue Bank of Victoria with bacteria isolated from musculoskeletal, skin and cardiac allografts retrieved from cadaveric donors. The results of all quality control samples for bacterial culture, taken during retrieval and processing of allografts at the DTBV for a 12 month period, were extracted and analysed. It was found that 15.7% of skin, 15.1% of heart valves and 5.8% of musculoskeletal samples had positive culture results. The number and types of organisms isolated varied with tissue type. The most commonly isolated organisms were Staphylococcus species (including S. aureus). The identity of the isolate and the number of positive specimens from the same donor were considerations in the decision concerning the suitability of tissue for subsequent implantation.     

Analysis of the effectiveness of Sodium Hypochlorite decontamination of cadaveric human tissues at retrieval

Bacterial contamination of tissues retrieved from cadaveric donors is a common feature worldwide, and every tissue bank, albeit using different methods, conducts decontamination to guarantee safe tissues suitable for clinical use. The effectiveness of the methods used to eradicate pathogens differs. In order to reduce the tissue bioburden at retrieval, we have introduced a new method involving rinsing tissues in a sodium hypochlorite solution. To test its effectiveness we analyzed two comparable groups of tissues: Group A: 1881 tissues, all rinsed with isotonic saline solution after retrieval, and Group B: 1968 tissues immersed in an isotonic saline solution containing sodium hypochlorite (final concentration 0.1 %) for different lengths of time and subsequently rinsed with isotonic saline. The rinsing solution of each tissue was then sampled for microbiological cultures in both groups. The resultant overall contamination rate was 40.5 % for Group A and 6.7 % for Group B, with an 82.8 % difference in the reduction of contamination between the two groups. This was especially the case for commensal skin bacteria in musculoskeletal tissue, which accounted for over half the overall contamination. Our data highlighted that decontamination with sodium hypochlorite was helpful in reducing the bacterial bioburden in tissues retrieved from cadaveric donors.     

Intra- and interindividual differences in tensile strength of human bone

In a biomechanical study we evaluated the stability of human femurs. In order to document the inter- and intraindividual differences in bending stability, we tested 200 bone samples, harvested from the femurs of 5 multiorgan donors. The bending tests were performed on a material testing machine (ZWICK) under standardized conditions. Our results revealed significant differences in the stability of the femurs of the 5 multiorgan donors. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in breaking strength at different levels of the same bone. Clinical relevance: In studies aimed at evaluating the primary bony stability of alloimplants after different preservation or sterilization procedures, the above-mentioned results should be taken into consideration.     

Development of a bacteriophage model system to investigate virus inactivation methods used in the treatment of bone allografts

Bone allografts are commonly used in a variety of surgical procedures, to reconstruct lost bone stock and to provide mechanical support during the healing process. Due to concerns regarding the possibility of disease transmission from donor to recipient, and of contamination of grafts during retrieval and processing procedures, it is common practice to sterilise bone allografts prior to issue for clinical use. It is vital that the sterilisation processes applied to allografts are validated to demonstrate that they achieve the required level of bioburden reduction, and by extension that validated models are used for these studies. Two common sterilisation protocols applied to bone allografts are gamma irradiation and ethylene oxide gas sterilisation, and there are currently no validated models available for measuring the anti-viral efficacy of ethylene oxide treatment with regard to bone allografts or readily useable models for assessing the anti-viral efficiency of gamma irradiation treatment. We have developed and validated models for both these sterilisation processes, using the bacteriophage ϕ×174, and utilised the models to measure the antiviral activity of the standard ethylene oxide and gamma irradiation sterilisation processes applied to bone allografts by the National Blood Service. For the irradiation model, we also utilised bacterial spores (Bacillus pumilus). Our results show that ethylene oxide sterilisation (which can only be applied to lyophilised grafts) inactivated >6.1log₁₀ of the model virus, and gamma irradiation (at 25–40 kGy and applied to frozen allografts) inactivated 3.6–4.0log₁₀ of the model virus and >4log₁₀ of the bacterial spores. Gamma irradiation at this dosage is therefore not in itself a sterilisation process with respect to viruses.     

Analysis of potential contamination factors in musculoskeletal tissues

Tissue Banks have become the main source for bone grafts, due to preference for homologous tissues. Notwithstanding the use of aseptic techniques for procurement of tissues and judicious selection of donors, microorganisms are frequently found in procured bones. Purpose of this study is to evaluate the factors that increase safety of procurement and minimize discard of procured tissues. Microbiological contamination was analyzed in 1271 musculoskeletal tissues removed from 138 multi-organ donors over a period extending from 2006 to 2016. Effects of various risk factors related with contamination were estimated using a logistic regression model. Microbiological contamination rate in the tissues was 17.1%; low pathogenic microorganisms were cultivated in 12.9% of the tissues, while highly pathogenic ones were cultivated in 4.2% of the tissues. Evolution of one single team was monitored during that period, verifying a fall in the general contamination level from 22.5 to 9.2%. Absence of antibiotics increased low pathogenic contamination risk. Every additional day in intensive care unit (ICU) increased the risk of highly pathogenic contamination. Time elapsed between death and the beginning of removal procedures was found to be relevant for both low pathogenic and highly pathogenic microorganisms. Among the studied factors, the following contributed for a significant increase in contamination by microorganisms in removed tissues: lack of use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy in donors, quantity of removed tissues, length of admission in ICU and the time elapsed between aortic clamping and beginning of the removal procedure.     

Aluminium accumulation and immunosuppressive effect in recipients of kidney transplants.

Aluminium that has accumulated in the body is thought to have a generalised cytotoxic effect. A prospective study of aluminium accumulation in bone-that is, subclinical aluminium toxicity--was carried out in 94 recipients of kidney allografts, who were followed up for three years. Subclinical aluminium toxicity was found in 66 patients. A significantly smaller proportion of patients with aluminium accumulation experienced a rejection episode: 30 (58%) nu 12 (86%) who received grafts from cadavers and 4 (29%) nu 10 (71%) who received grafts from living donors. On multivariate analysis only the source of the kidney and aluminium accumulation were found to influence the rejection rate. These findings suggest that aluminium accumulation has an immunosuppressive effect.     

Brain death and organ donation in a neurosurgical unit: audit of recent practice.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the potential for increasing the yield of donors by comparing the current pattern of brain death and organ donation in a neurosurgical unit with that reported in 1981 and with a recent national audit. DESIGN--Retrospective review of all deaths for 1986, 1987, and 1988 and prospective data for 1989. SETTING--A regional neurosurgical unit serving 2.7 million population. RESULTS--Of 553 deaths, 35% (191) patients died while on a ventilator and 17% (92) after discontinuation of ventilation. Medical contraindications to donation were found in 23% (32) of 141 patients tested for brain death, in 38% (19) of 50 patients who died while being ventilated who were not tested, and in 12% (11) of 92 patients no longer being ventilated. Consent for donation was sought in 88% (96) of 109 medically suitable brain dead patients and granted in 70% (67) of these. Half those with permission for multiorgan donation had only the kidneys removed. CONCLUSIONS--More organs may be lost owing to transplant team logistics than by failure to seek consent from relatives of brain dead patients. The estimated size of the pool of potential donors depends on what types of patients might be considered. Ensuring that all who die while being ventilated are tested for brain death and considering the potential for donation before withdrawing ventilation could yield more donors. Ventilating more patients who are hopelessly brain damaged to secure more donors raises ethical and economic issues.