Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 12

Summary A pericentric inversion in one of the chromosomes 12, found in two families living in the same region, is deseribed. This inversion was detected during routine chromosomal analysis in two separate laboratories. The breakpoints were at 12p112 and 12q13. The inverted segment represented approximately 20% of the length of chromosome 12. Twenty nine descendants of carriers of the inversion were investigated, and the inversion was present in 23 of them. The other six descendants showed a normal karyotype. After correction for sample bias with the single selection scheme, a segregation ratio of 3:1 was estimated, indicating that the inverted chromosome 12 was preferentially transmitted. All the carriers of the inversion were phenotypically normal, without noticeable fertility disturbances.     

Familial pericentric inversion (3)(p12q24)

Summary A large kindred with a familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 3, (p12q24), was found after an investigation initiated by a young female with three spontaneous first-trimester abortions. Altogether 22 (33%) inversion carriers were discovered, 9 females and 13 males. 6 women and 9 men were included in the fertility and segregation analyses because they were all either sexually mature or past maturity. The abortion frequency was below the average European rate in both the inversion carrier group and the cytogenetically normal relative group; 6%: 3%, respectively. The mean numbers of pregnancies and live births (1.8–3.1) did not vary significantly in the two comparison groups. The segregation analysis among the inversion carriers showed a good correspondence to the theoretical 11 ratio (1613). Males and females contributed equally. No duplication/deletion syndromes have been found in the kindred; all family members are phenotypically normal. We report a balanced familial pericentric inversion with no adverse effects. This chromosome aberration could be an example of a harmless chromosome polymorphism.     

Inv(10)(p11.2q21.2), a variant chromosome

We present 33 families in which a pericentric inversion of chromosome 10 is segregating. In addition, we summarise the data on 32 families in which an apparently identical inv(10) has been reported in the literature. Ascertainment was through prenatal diagnosis or with a normal phenotype in 21/33 families. In the other 12 families, probands were ascertained through a wide variety of referral reasons but in all but one case (a stillbirth), studies of the family showed that the reason for referral was unrelated to the chromosome abnormality. There has been, to our knowledge, no recorded instance of a recombinant chromosome 10 arising from this inversion and no excess of infertility or spontaneous abortion among carriers of either sex. We propose that inv(10)(p11.2q21.2) can be regarded as a variant analogous to the pericentric inversion of chromosome 2(p11q13). We conclude that prenatal chromosome analysis is not justified for inv(10) carriers. In addition, family investigation of carrier status is not warranted in view of the unnecessary concern this may cause parents and other family members. Received: 7 July 1997 / Accepted: 4 August 1997     

Study on segregation of the inversion of chromosome 4 (p15.2q11) in two unrelated families

Summary A pericentric inversion of chromosome 4 with identical breakpoints (p15.2q11) has been found in two unrelated families. The presence of the inversion in three generations was observed but no recombinants have been recognized. In order to provide appropriate genetic counselling, segregation data and possible reproductive risk are discussed.     

Frequency of recombinant and nonrecombinant products of pericentric inversion of chromosome 1 in sperm nuclei of carrier: by FISH technique

Meiotic segregation products of carriers with pericentric inversion are very important for assessing the risk of unbalanced forms and appropriate genetic counseling. We investigated the incidence of recombinant and nonrecombinant products of chromosome 1 with pericentric inversion, in the sperm nuclei of the carrier by using triple color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The centromere specific and telomere specific probes for chromosome 1 were used. In the segregation analysis, 1,636 sperm nuclei were analyzed; 82.5% of the sperms were including normal or inverted chromosome 1, and the dup(p)/del(q) and del(p)/dup(q) recombinant products in sperm nuclei of our carrier were 8.7 and 7.3%, respectively. The number of recombinant products may be dependent on the formation of an inversion loop, which the number of the formation of chiasmata results in the different number of normal/balanced and recombinant products. The use of FISH, using different probe combination, in sperm nuclei has proved to be an accurate approach to determine the meiotic segregation patterns and could help to better establish a reproductive prognosis and genetic counseling.     

The clinical significance of pericentric inversion of the human Y chromosome: a rare "third" type of heteromorphism

A 28-year-old normal East Indian was found to have a pericentric inversion of the Y chromosome. After reviewing the literature, it was concluded that an inverted Y chromosome does not impede the production of normal sperm and does not predispose to non-disjunction of other chromosomes in the progeny. Thus, the earlier concept of nondisjunction was rejected, and it is suggested that aberrant cases with aneuploidy and an inverted Y are fortuitous. The pericentric inverted Y is inherited from generation to generation and has no clinical significance. The prevalence of males with pericentric Y inversion in the general population is approximately 1 per 1000. It is suggested that a pericentric inversion of the Y chromosome is a rare chromosomal heteromorphism and should be called type III.     

Pericentric inversions in man: personal experience and review of the literature

Summary The Leuven cytogenetic centre experience on pericentric inversion in man is discussed with exclusion of the pericentric inversions of the heterochromatic blocks of chromosomes 1 and 9. In a total of 51,500 patients, referred for constitutional chromosome analysis during the period 1970–1985, pericentric inversions were found in 24 index patients. The breakpoints detected in these different pericentric inversions are summarized and compared to those found in previous reports. Bands 2p13, 2q21, 5q31, 6c21, 10q22, and 12q13 were shown to be repeatedly involved in the different studies and, furthermore, breakpoints at bands 2q11, 5p13, 5p15, 5q13, 7q11, 11q25, and 14p11 were present in this study as well as in our previous review on reciprocal autosomal translocations. In 13 familial pericentric inversions, even after exclusion of all inversion carrier probands, a 1.6:1 excess of pericentric inversion carriers versus karyotypically normal progeny was observed. While chromosomally unbalanced offspring represent 3.5% of all chromosomally investigated liveborns of the present study, 7.1% of all liveborn inversion carrier offspring presented with a mental retardation and/or multiple congenital anomalies (MR/MCA) problem. Additional chromosomal abnormalities, i.e. a 21 trisomy and an accessory small ring chromosome were observed in two pericentric inversion carriers. These data and results are discussed and compared to the data available in the literature.     

Pericentric inversion of chromosome 19 in three families

Summary Pericentric inversion of chromosome 19 has been found in several members of three unrelated families from a restricted geographical region. In one of the families, an additional pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 was observed. Reproductive problems, multiple abortions in two families and a neonatal death in the third, were present. A review of previously described cases is included, and the genetic risk connected with this type of rearrangement is also discussed.     

Inv21p12q22del21q22 and intellectual disability

Chromosomal rearrangements are common in humans. Pericentric inversions are among the most frequent aberrations (1–2%). Most inversions are balanced and do not cause problems in carriers unless one of the breakpoints disrupts important functional genes, has near submicroscopic copy number variants or hosts “cryptic” complex chromosomal rearrangements. Pericentric inversions can lead to imbalance in offspring. Less than 3% of Down syndrome patients have duplication as a result of parental pericentric inversion of chromosome 21. We report a family with an apparently balanced pericentric inversion of chromosome 21. The proband, a 23-year-old female was referred for prenatal diagnosis at 16 weeks gestation because of increased nuchal translucency. She has a familial history of Down's syndrome and moderate intellectual disability, a personal history of four spontaneous abortions and learning difficulties. Peripheral blood and amniotic fluid samples were collected to perform proband's and fetus' cytogenetic analyses. Additionally, another six family members were evaluated and cytogenetic analysis was performed. Complementary FISH and MLPA studies were carried out. An apparent balanced chromosome 21 pericentric inversion was observed in four family members, two revealed a recombinant chromosome 21 with partial trisomy, and one a full trisomy 21 with an inverted chromosome 21. Array CGH analysis was performed in the mother and the brother's proband. MLPA and aCGH studies identified a deletion of about 1.7 Mb on the long arm of inverted chromosome 21q22.11. We believe the cause of the intellectual disability/learning difficulties observed in the members with the inversion is related to this deletion. The recombinant chromosome 21 has a partial trisomy including the DSCR with no deletion. The risk for carriers of having a child with multiple malformations/intellectual disability is about 30% depending on whether and how this rearrangement interferes with meiosis.     

Pericentric inversion in natural populations of Oligoryzomys nigripes (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae).

We analysed polymorphism for pericentric inversion in chromosome 3 of Oligoryzomys nigripes (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) in several populations in Brazil and examined the meiotic behaviour of this chromosome in heterozygotes. We observed an orderly pairing of all chromosomes at pachytene in heterozygotes for the inverted chromosome 3. No indication of meiotic arrest and germ-cell death was found. Electron microscopy of synaptonemal complexes and conventional meiotic analysis indicated strictly nonhomologous synapsis and crossing-over suppression in the inverted region in the heterozygotes, which prevent the formation of unbalanced gametes. Thus, the pericentric inversion in chromosome 3 does not apparently result in any selective disadvantages in heterozygous carriers. In the majority of the populations studied, the frequencies of acrocentric homozygotes, metacentric homozygotes, and heterozygotes were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. However, in some populations, we detected an excess of heterozygotes and a deficiency of acrocentric homozygotes.     

Molecular analysis of recombination in a family with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and a large pericentric X chromosome inversion.

It has been demonstrated in animal studies that, in animals heterozygous for pericentric chromosomal inversions, loop formation is greatly reduced during meiosis. This results in absence of recombination within the inverted segment, with recombination seen only outside the inversion. A recent study in yeast has shown that telomeres, rather than centromeres, lead in chromosome movement just prior to meiosis and may be involved in promoting recombination. We studied by cytogenetic analysis and DNA polymorphisms the nature of meiotic recombination in a three-generation family with a large pericentric X chromosome inversion, inv(X)(p21.1q26), in which Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) was cosegregating with the inversion. On DNA analysis there was no evidence of meiotic recombination between the inverted and normal X chromosomes in the inverted segment. Recombination was seen at the telomeric regions, Xp22 and Xq27-28. No deletion or point mutation was found on analysis of the DMD gene. On the basis of the FISH results, we believe that the X inversion is the mutation responsible for DMD in this family. Our results indicate that (1) pericentric X chromosome inversions result in reduction of recombination between the normal and inverted X chromosomes; (2) meiotic X chromosome pairing in these individuals is likely initiated at the telomeres; and (3) in this family DMD is caused by the pericentric inversion.     

Familial pericentric inversion of the X chromosome [inv(X)(p11q28)]

A familial pericentric inversion of the X chromosome [46,X,inv(X)(p11q28)] and [46,inv(X)(p11q28), Y] is reported. The carriers of the inv(X) presented no clinical symptoms. Either the inverted or the normal X chromosome may be late replicating.     

Pericentric inversion of chromosome 2 (p11 q13) in unrelated families (author's transl)]

A pericentric inversion of chromosome 2 has been detected in 4 unrelated families. The break points are identical in band 2p11 and band 2q13. Reproductive history of these couples is analyzed. The pathology of these particular regions of chromosome 2 is discussed.     

Paracentric inversion of chromosome 15(q15q24): description of three families

Three unrelated families with paracentric inversion of chromosome 15(q15q24) are reported. An additional pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 with breakpoints in p11.2q13 was also observed in one of the three families. Reproductive problems, such as stillbirths, spontaneous abortions and two live-born children with multiple abnormalities, were present.     

Duplication deficiency as the result of meiotic segregation of a maternal InV (10)

Summary In a family a large pericentric inversion involving nearly 70% of the chromosome 10 has been segregating during three generations, giving several carriers and an affected male with the karyotype 46,XY,der(10)(10pter10q25::10p12 10pter) mat. The patient is trisomic for 10p except for a small segment near the centromere, and monosomic for the distal 10q26. A simple diagrammatic representation explains the behavior of the inv(10) in meiosis. The study of meiotic segregation in the present case, and the reviews of previously reported duplication-deficiencies, agree with established postulates and add some principles to the understanding of duplication deficiencies resulting from the meiotic behavior of inverted chromosomes.     

Familial pericentric and paracentric inversions of chromosome 1

Summary We investigated 33 individuals (21 carriers) from one family with a pericentric inversion involving a large part of chromosome 1 (1p36.11q32). In addition, we investigated 15 individuals (10 carriers) from another family with a paracentric inversion of a small part of chromosome 1(1p321p36.1). In each family, the index patient was ascertained because three miscarriages had occurred. Each carrier of these inversions was phenotypically normal. If the miscarriages of the index patients are excluded, the frequency of recognized miscarriages among the carriers of childbearing age was 9% (4 of 46) for the family with pericentric inversion and 17% (4 of 23) for the family with paracentric inversion. One of the pericentric inv(1) carriers had had a stillborn daughter. The carriers of the pericentric inversion who were of childbearing age had 41 children; carriers of the paracentric inversion who were of childbearing age had 19 children. No live-born children with birth defects were observed in either family. This evidence, together with the low frequency of miscarriages, suggests that crossover within the inversion loop occurs much less frequently than might be expected from the large size of this inversion. Our investigation suggests that the risk of recognized miscarriages, stillbirths, and live-born children with recombinant chromosomes who have birth defects may be much lower for inv(1) carriers than previously reported. The risk of having a malformed child because of a recombinant chromosome is probably less than 3% for carriers of the pericentric inversion and less than 6% for the carriers of the paracentric inversion.     

A new case of pericentric inversion 20

A prenatal diagnosis from a chorionic villi biopsy revealed a pericentric inversion of chromosome 20. The child's father also carries the inverted chromosome. The breakpoints p13q11.2 differ for 4 of the 5 published cases of inversion 20.     

inv(9)(p24q13) in three sterile brothers

Only nine non-polymorphic constitutional pericentric inversions of chromosome 9 have been described. We report on a familial inv(9)(p24q13) associated with sterility in three brothers. The mother's chromosomes were normal in blood lymphocytes (n=130); the father was already deceased and his karyotype unknown. However, the presence of any of the maternal chromosomes 9 (as assessed by C-banding) in her carrier children is inconsistent with the assumption of maternal mosaicism. Two single sisters were also carriers. The same rearranged chromosome 9 in the three sterile brothers can hardly be regarded as a fortuitous association, especially when the breakpoints are almost identical to those of the sole inversion previously found in an azoospermic male. If their father was a carrier, the observed sterility may be the result of 'chromosome anticipation', a phenomenon already invoked for certain familial chromosomal rearrangements.     

Unusual segregation products in sperm from a pericentric inversion 17 heterozygote

Chromosome segregation and interchromosomal effect were studied in spermatozoa from a carrier of a pericentric chromosome 17 inversion, 46,XY,inv(17)(p13.1q25.3). Sperm chromosome segregation, lymphocytes of the inversion carrier, and cells from his offspring were analysed by multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization. The frequency of balanced sperm was 73%. An unusual segregation of recombinants was observed, viz. deletion of the p arm (14.6%) or duplication of the p arm with the presence of one q arm (8.4%), instead of the expected recombinants, viz. duplication of one arm with deletion of the other and vice versa. These unusual recombinants were explained by the position of the 17q breakpoint, which was between the q arm telomere-associated repeats and the unique q subtelomere region. The offspring of the donor were found to have a 17p deletion including the Miller-Dieker critical region, similar to the most frequent recombinant sperm class. The disomy frequency was significantly increased for chromosome 17 compared with other autosomes, suggesting that pairing and recombination of the inversion may predispose to non-disjunction. There was no significant difference between the frequencies of aneuploidy for chromosomes 13, 21, X and Y in the chromosome inversion heterozygote compared with controls. Thus, this unique pericentric inversion of chromosome 17 produces unusual recombinant products; no evidence was apparent of an interchromosomal effect in any of the tested chromosomes.