DWnt-4 and Wingless have distinct activities in the Drosophila dorsal epidermis

Wnt genes are often expressed in overlapping patterns, where they affect a wide array of developmental processes. To address the way in which various Wnt signals elicit distinct effects we compared the activities of two Wnt genes in Drosophila, DWnt-4, and wingless. We show that these Wnt signals produce distinct responses in cells of the dorsal embryonic epidermis. Whereas wingless acts independently of hedgehog signaling in these cells, we show that DWnt-4 requires Hh to elicit its effects. We also show that expression of Wg signal transduction components does not mimic expression of DWnt-4, suggesting that DWnt-4 signaling proceeds through a distinct pathway. The dorsal epidermis may therefore be useful in the identification of novel Wnt signaling components. Received: 16 August 1999 / Accepted: 19 August 1999     

Wingless modulates the effects of dominant negative notch molecules in the developing wing of Drosophila

The development and patterning of the wing in Drosophila relies on a sequence of cell interactions molecularly driven by a number of ligands and receptors. Genetic analysis indicates that a receptor encoded by the Notch gene and a signal encoded by the wingless gene play a number of interdependent roles in this process and display very strong functional interactions. At certain times and places, during wing development, the expression of wingless requires Notch activity and that of its ligands Delta and Serrate. This has led to the proposal that all the interactions between Notch and wingless can be understood in terms of this regulatory relationship. Here we have tested this proposal by analysing interactions between Delta- and Serrate-activated Notch signalling and Wingless signalling during wing development and patterning. We find that the cell death caused by expressing dominant negative Notch molecules during wing development cannot be rescued by coexpressing Nintra. This suggests that the dominant negative Notch molecules cannot only disrupt Delta and Serrate signalling but can also disrupt signalling through another pathway. One possibility is the Wingless signalling pathway as the cell death caused by expressing dominant negative Notch molecules can be rescued by activating Wingless signalling. Furthermore, we observe that the outcome of the interactions between Notch and Wingless signalling differs when we activate Wingless signalling by expressing either Wingless itself or an activated form of the Armadillo. For example, the effect of expressing the activated form of Armadillo with a dominant negative Notch on the patterning of sense organ precursors in the wing resembles the effects of expressing Wingless alone. This result suggests that signalling activated by Wingless leads to two effects, a reduction of Notch signalling and an activation of Armadillo.     

The glypican Dally-like is required for Hedgehog signalling in the embryonic epidermis of Drosophila

The Drosophila genes dally and dally-like encode glypicans, which are heparan sulphate proteoglycans anchored to the cell membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol link. Genetic studies have implicated Dally and Dally-like in Wingless signalling in embryos and imaginal discs. Here, we test the signalling properties of these molecules in the embryonic epidermis. We demonstrate that RNA interference silencing of dally-like, but not dally, gives a segment polarity phenotype identical to that of null mutations in wingless or hedgehog. Using heterologous expression in embryos, we uncoupled the Hedgehog and Wingless signalling pathways and found that Dally-like and Dally, separately or together, are not necessary for Wingless signalling. Dally-like, however, is strictly necessary for Hedgehog signal transduction. Epistatic experiments show that Dally-like is required for the reception of the Hedgehog signal, upstream or at the level of the Patched receptor.     

The C-terminal domain of armadillo binds to hypophosphorylated teashirt to modulate wingless signalling in Drosophila

Wnt signalling is a key pathway for tissue patterning during animal development. In Drosophila, the Wnt protein Wingless acts to stabilize Armadillo inside cells where it binds to at least two DNA-binding factors which regulate specific target genes. One Armadillo-binding protein in Drosophila is the zinc finger protein Teashirt. Here we show that Wingless signalling promotes the phosphorylation and the nuclear accumulation of Teashirt. This process requires the binding of Teashirt to the C-terminal end of Armadillo. Finally, we present evidence that the serine/threonine kinase Shaggy is associated with Teashirt in a complex. We discuss these results with respect to current models of Armadillo/beta-catenin action for the transmission of the Wingless/Wnt pathway.     

A Drosophila Axin homolog, Daxin, inhibits Wnt signaling.

The vertebrate Axin protein, the product of the mouse fused gene, binds to beta-catenin to inhibit Wnt signaling. We have identified a homolog of Axin in Drosophila, Daxin. Using double-stranded RNA interference, we generated loss-of-function phenotypes that are similar to overexpression of the Drosophila Wnt gene wingless (wg). Overexpression of Daxin produces phenotypes similar to loss of wg. In addition, we show that Daxin overexpression can modify phenotypes elicited by wg and another Drosophila Wnt gene, DWnt-2. Using immunoprecipitation of endogenous Daxin protein from embryos we show that Daxin interacts with Armadillo and Zeste-white 3. The loss-of-function and overexpression phenotypes show that Daxin, like its mammalian counterpart, acts as a negative regulator of wg/Wnt signaling.     

Ligand receptor interactions in the Wnt signaling pathway in Drosophila

Secreted Wnt proteins have numerous signaling functions during development, mediated by Frizzled molecules that act as Wnt receptors on the cell surface. In the genome of Drosophila, seven Wnt genes (including wingless; wg), and five frizzled genes have been identified. Relatively little is known about signaling and binding specificities of different Wnt and Frizzled proteins. We have developed an assay to determine the strength of binding between membrane-tethered Wnts and ligand binding domains of the Frizzled receptors. We found a wide spectrum of binding affinities, reflecting known genetic interactions. Most Wnt proteins can bind to multiple Frizzleds and vice versa, suggesting redundancy in vivo. In an extension of these experiments, we tested whether two different subdomains of the Wg protein would by themselves bind to Frizzled and generate a biological response. Whereas these two separate domains are secreted from cells, suggesting that they form independently folded parts of the protein, they were only able to evoke a response when co-transfected, indicating that both are required for function. In addition to the Frizzleds, members of the LRP family (represented by the arrow gene in Drosophila) are also necessary for Wnt signal transduction and have been postulated to act as co-receptors. We have therefore examined whether a soluble form of the Arrow molecule can bind to Wingless and Frizzled, but no interactions were detected.     

Once upon a time there was beta-catenin in cadherin-mediated signalling

beta-Catenin was initially characterized as a protein interacting with the cadherin cytoplasmic tail and regulating cell-cell contacts and actin cytoskeleton interactions. Moreover, the gene coding for the Drosophila orthologue of beta-catenin, armadillo, was independently identified downstream of wingless in the segment-polarity signalling pathway. In fact, beta-catenin/Armadillo turned out to be key mediators of the Wnt/Wingless pathways in vertebrates and invertebrates. beta-Catenin participates in both adhesion and signalling functions in a mutually exclusive manner; bound to cadherins at the plasma membrane or 'unbound' in cytosolic or nuclear complexes. This model had placed beta-catenin at the crossroads between cadherin and Wnt signalling, leading to the dogma of inhibition of beta-catenin signalling by cadherins.     

Tribolium Wnts: evidence for a larger repertoire in insects with overlapping expression patterns that suggest multiple redundant functions in embryogenesis

Wingless (wg)/Wnt family genes encode secreted glycoproteins that function as signalling molecules in the development of vertebrates as well as invertebrates. In a survey of Wnt family genes in the newly sequenced Tribolium genome, we found a total of nine Wnt genes. In addition to wg or Wnt1, Tribolium contains orthologs of the vertebrate Wnt5-7 and Wnt9-11 genes. As in Drosophila, Wnt1, Wnt6 and Wnt10 are clustered in the genome. Comparative genomics indicates that Wnt9 is also a conserved member of this cluster in several insects for which genome sequence is available. One of the Tribolium Wnt genes appears to be a member of the WntA family, members of which have been identified in Anopheles and other invertebrates but not in Drosophila or vertebrates. Careful phylogenetic examination suggests an Apis Wnt gene, previously identified as a Wnt4 homolog, is also a member of the WntA family. The ninth Tribolium Wnt gene is related to the diverged Drosophila WntD gene, both of which phylogenetically group with Wnt8 genes. Some of the Tribolium Wnt genes display multiple overlapping expression patterns, suggesting that they may be functionally redundant in segmentation, brain, appendage and hindgut development. In contrast, the unique expression patterns of Wnt5, Wnt7 and Wnt11 in developing appendages likely indicate novel functions.     

Differential requirements of the fused kinase for hedgehog signalling in the Drosophila embryo.

The two signalling proteins, Wingless and Hedgehog, play fundamental roles in patterning cells within each metamere of the Drosophila embryo. Within the ventral ectoderm, Hedgehog signals both to the anterior and posterior directions: anterior flanking cells express the wingless and patched Hedgehog target genes whereas posterior flanking cells express only patched. Furthermore, Hedgehog acts as a morphogen to pattern the dorsal cuticle, on the posterior side of cells where it is produced. Thus responsive embryonic cells appear to react according to their position relative to the Hedgehog source. The molecular basis of these differences is still largely unknown. In this paper we show that one component of the Hedgehog pathway, the Fused kinase accumulates preferentially in cells that could respond to Hedgehog but that Fused concentration is not a limiting step in the Hedgehog signalling. We present direct evidence that Fused is required autonomously in anterior cells neighbouring Hedgehog in order to maintain patched and wingless expression while Wingless is in turn maintaining engrailed and hedgehog expression. By expressing different components of the Hedgehog pathway only in anterior, wingless-expressing cells we could show that the Hedgehog signalling components Smoothened and Cubitus interruptus are required in cells posterior to Hedgehog domain to maintain patched expression whereas Fused is not necessary in these cells. This result suggests that Hedgehog responsive ventral cells in embryos can be divided into two distinct types depending on their requirement for Fused activity. In addition, we show that the morphogen Hedgehog can pattern the dorsal cuticle independently of Fused. In order to account for these differences in Fused requirements, we propose the existence of position-specific modulators of the Hedgehog response.     

Arrow (LRP6) and Frizzled2 cooperate to degrade Wingless in Drosophila imaginal discs

Lysosome-mediated ligand degradation is known to shape morphogen gradients and modulate the activity of various signalling pathways. We have investigated the degradation of Wingless, a Drosophila member of the Wnt family of secreted growth factors. We find that one of its signalling receptors, Frizzled2, stimulates Wingless internalization both in wing imaginal discs and cultured cells. However, this is not sufficient for degradation. Indeed, as shown previously, overexpression of Frizzled2 leads to Wingless stabilization in wing imaginal discs. We show that Arrow (the Drosophila homologue of LRP5/6), another receptor involved in signal transduction, abrogates such stabilization. We provide evidence that Arrow stimulates the targeting of Frizzled2-Wingless (but not Dally-like-Wingless) complexes to a degradative compartment. Thus, Frizzled2 alone cannot lead Wingless all the way from the plasma membrane to a degradative compartment. Overall, Frizzled2 achieves ligand capture and internalization, whereas Arrow, and perhaps downstream signalling, are essential for lysosomal targeting.     

Armadillo/beta-catenin-dependent Wnt signalling is required for the polarisation of epidermal cells during dorsal closure in Drosophila

At the end of germband retraction, the dorsal epidermis of the Drosophila embryo exhibits a discontinuity that is covered by the amnioserosa. The process of dorsal closure (DC) involves a coordinated set of cell-shape changes within the epidermis and the amnioserosa that result in epidermal continuity. Polarisation of the dorsal-most epidermal (DME) cells in the plane of the epithelium is an important aspect of DC. The DME cells of embryos mutant for wingless or dishevelled exhibit polarisation defects and fail to close properly. We have investigated the role of the Wingless signalling pathway in the polarisation of the DME cells and DC. We find that the beta-catenin-dependent Wingless signalling pathway is required for polarisation of the DME cells. We further show that although the DME cells are polarised in the plane of the epithelium and present polarised localisation of proteins associated with the process of planar cell polarity (PCP) in the wing, e.g. Flamingo, PCP Wingless signalling is not involved in DC.     

Signalling at a distance: transport of Wingless in the embryonic epidermis of Drosophila.

Secreted signalling molecules affect the behavior of cells at a distance. Here we discuss how the Wnt family member Wingless reaches distant cells within the embryonic epidermis of Drosophila.We consider three possible mechanisms: free diffusion, restricted diffusion and active transport. We argue that free diffusion is unlikely to occur. However, a variant of restricted diffusion may account for Wingless transport. It may be that Wingless is carried from one side of a cell to the other by a drifting transmembrane protein such as a specific receptor or a glycosaminoglycan. Transfer from cell-to-cell would involve release from the donor cell and recapture in an adjacent cell. Alternatively, Wingless might be transported by a mechanism akin to transcytosis. This would involve the packaging of Wingless in specialized vesicles at one end of a cell, active transport across the cell, and vesicle fusion and Wingless release on the other side. We describe the evidence in favor and against these two alternatives.     

Segmenting the fly embryo: logical analysis of the role of the segment polarity cross-regulatory module

Initially activated by the pair-rule genes, the expression patterns of the segment polarity genes engrailed and wingless become consolidated through inter-cellular interactions between juxtaposed cells. We delineate a logical model focusing on a dozen molecular components at the core of the regulatory network controlling this process. Our model leads to the following conclusions: (1) the pair-rule signals, which activate engrailed and wingless genes independently of each other, need to be operative until the inter-cellular circuit involving these two genes is functional. This implies that the pair-rule pattern is instrumental both in determining the activation of the genes engrailed and wingless in rows of adjacent cells, and in consolidating these expression patterns; (2) the consolidation of engrailed and wingless expression patterns requires the simultaneous activation of both autocrine and paracrine Wingless-pathways, and the Hedgehog pathway; (3) protein kinase A plays at least two roles through the phosphorylation of Cubitus interruptus, the effector molecule of the Hedgehog signalling pathway and (4) the roles of Sloppy-paired and Naked in the delineation of the engrailed and wingless expression domains are emphasized as being important for segmental boundary formation. Moreover, the application of an original computational method leads to the delineation of a subset of crucial regulatory circuits enabling the coexistence of specific expression states at the cellular level, as well as specific combination of cellular states inter-connected through Wingless and Hedgehog signalling. Finally, the simulation of altered expressions of segment polarity genes leads to results consistent with the published data.