The financial environment of aesthetic surgery: results of a survey of plastic surgeons

To gather information about aesthetic surgery's current practice structures, competitive environment, patient price sensitivity, and marketing and practice development requirements, a two-page survey was developed and mailed to all 1180 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. A total of 632 surveys were returned (response rate of 54.5 percent). Most aesthetic plastic surgeons said they were in solo practice (63.3 percent). More than two-thirds described the marketplace as "very competitive," with 59 percent reporting 25 or more surgeons offering aesthetic surgery in their area. They estimated their patients' average income at $62,800. Nearly all plastic surgeons labeled their patients as "moderately price sensitive" (62.3 percent) or "very price sensitive" (30.6 percent). Similarly, 23.2 percent estimated that they had lost 20 or more patients within the last year for reasons of price. Practice development and marketing efforts represented an average of 7.3 percent of plastic surgeons' working time. Parameters associated with a high percentage of time devoted to these activities were solo practice, percentage of revenue from aesthetic surgery greater than 50 percent, a practice environment designation of moderately or very competitive, and ten or more area surgeons offering aesthetic surgery (p < 0.05). High patient income led to only slight decreases in price sensitivity and did not significantly reduce the amount of time spent on marketing and practice development. Although the rest of the healthcare industry has undergone a period of consolidation, aesthetic surgeons have been able to resist these changes. The results of this survey suggest that the fragmented nature of the aesthetic surgery industry is associated with additional burdens on plastic surgeons. As the aesthetic surgery market becomes more competitive, plastic surgeons may benefit from consolidation to reduce costs and maximize efficiency.     

Breast reconstruction using modified tissue expansion

Inadequate chest-wall skin following mastectomy for carcinoma continues to be a problem in many breast reconstructions. To avoid extensive surgery, serial tissue expansion has been advocated. Since 1977, one of the authors has used a simple method of tissue expansion that we have termed "modified tissue expansion", defined as the creation of an adequate breast mound in one or two stages using a permanent prosthesis. Ninety percent of patients undergoing breast reconstruction between 1978 and 1983 were reconstructed using this method. A retrospective analysis of these 208 patients is presented. There were no mortalities, and only a 6.3 percent complication rate. Skin necroses related directly to the prosthesis occurred once, and there were no prosthetic deflations. Eighteen percent had first-step reconstruction only. The initial prosthesis averaged 400 cc in size. Selected Halsted radical mastectomy and postradiotherapy patients were successfully reconstructed. Seventy-eight percent felt their results were excellent at 1 year. Two percent were dissatisfied. Multiple office visits and the potential problems of serial expansion were avoided. Modified tissue expansion is a simple and viable method and should be considered among the options for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.     

Plastic surgeon's life: marvelous for mind, exhausting for body

Surgery is accepted as one of the most demanding professions that create both physical and mental strain on the performers. Therefore, the authors aimed to elucidate the mental burden of surgeons, which is dedicated to operative stress. They also tested the hypotheses that participating in surgery creates mental stress on surgeons that leads to cardiovascular changes, and that this stress is more pronounced for actual operators than for first assistants. The method chosen for this purpose was an analysis of heart rate variability. Twelve surgeons (five plastic surgery staff and seven plastic surgery residents) were monitored by a digital ambulatory Holter recorder on at least two occasions. Half of the recordings were carried out on operating days and the other half on office days. Heart rate variability indices (low frequency, high frequency, high frequency/low frequency ratio, and heart rate) were analyzed from those recordings using computerized research tool software. The heart rate variability indices of the operators showed statistically significant differences between operating days and office hours in favor of an increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic activity for the former. For first assistants, three of the parameters, with the exception of heart rate, changed in favor of a sympathetic predominance over parasympathetic activity; these changes were also statistically significant. These results showed a sympathetic hyperactivity for both operators and first assistants during the operations. When the sympathovagal balance of the actual operators was compared with that of assistants, the former group showed a more pronounced sympathetic arousal. This difference is accepted as a proof for the mental stress of the surgery being the main factor responsible for the sympathetic hyperactivity that we detected during the operations. Surgeons continuously face a unique mental strain that other professions rarely bring forth, and these psychological stressors are associated with alterations in cardiac autonomic control that may contribute to the development of cardiac disease. Prolonged sympathetic hyperactivity could anticipate cardiac discomfort in more experienced surgeons with marginal cardiac reserve. Such cardiac diseases would be reconsidered as occupation-related illnesses, which might be reimbursed to the physician. In addition, the legal responsibility of surgeons concerning their unfavorable results might be assessed with more understanding with a realization of their undue working conditions.     

Discount cosmetic surgery: industry trends and strategies for success

Discount cosmetic surgery is a topic of interest to plastic surgeons. To understand this trend and its effects on plastic surgeons, it is necessary to review the economics of cosmetic surgery, plastic surgery's practice environment, and the broader business principles of service industries.Recent work looked at the economics of the plastic surgery market. This analysis demonstrated that increased local density of plastic surgeons was associated with lower adjusted fees for cosmetic procedures. A survey of plastic surgeons about their practice environment revealed that 93 percent categorized the majority of their patients as very or moderately price-sensitive. Fully 98 percent described their business climate as very or moderately competitive and most plastic surgeons thought they lost a sizable number of cosmetic patients within the last year for reasons of price.A standard industry analysis, when applied to cosmetic surgery, reveals the following: an increased number of surgeons leads to lower fees (reducing their bargaining power as suppliers), patients are price-sensitive (increasing their bargaining power as buyers), and there are few barriers to entry among providers (allowing potential new entrants into the market). Such a situation is conducive to discounting taking hold-and even becoming the industry norm.In this environment, business strategy dictates there are three protocols for success: discounting, differentiation, and focus. Discounting joins the trend toward cutting fees. Success comes from increasing volume and efficiency and thus preserving profits. Differentiation creates an industrywide perception of uniqueness; this requires broadly positioning plastic surgeons as holders of a distinct brand identity separate from other "cosmetic surgeons." The final strategy is to focus on a particular buyer group to develop a market niche, such as establishing a "Park Avenue" practice catering to patients who demand a prestigious surgeon, although this is likely a small segment of the overall patient population. Plastic surgeons that buck the trend toward discount cosmetic surgery must take concrete and potentially costly steps to implement a plausible strategy for distinguishing their practices within the crowded cosmetic surgery market.     

One hospital's experience with a "Do not resuscitate" policy.

A "No not resuscitate" policy was instituted at McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, in January 1979. Its objectives were to ensure that physicians decide on the appropriateness of resuscitation attempts before they might be needed; to have each physician consult his or her patients, or the families of incompetent patients, to determine their wishes concerning further treatment; and to provide legal protection of or physicians and the hospital in regard to the policy. To determine the effectiveness of the "Do not resuscitate" policy a questionnaire was sent to a sample of the professional staff of the hospital; the overall response rate was 87%. The respondents felt that a better way of informing hospital staff of the policy and its objectives was needed. However, the results of the questionnaire suggested that, on the whole, the policy was perceived as beneficial to both patients and physicians at the hospital.     

Managed care's attempts to capture aesthetic surgery

Managed care organizations recently have attempted to add aesthetic surgery to their line of available services. To better understand the challenges posed by these actions, all members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were surveyed about managed care overtures to aesthetic plastic surgeons, their responses, and the likely responses of their patients. The goal was to examine both the supplier and consumer ends of the aesthetic surgery market to determine the likely effects of managed care's attempts to capture aesthetic surgery. A total of 632 plastic surgeons returned the surveys (response rate, 54.5 percent). Twenty-two percent reported being approached by managed care organizations about joining a panel of aesthetic surgeons. Approximately one-quarter of the plastic surgeons said they would participate in aesthetic surgery panels developed by managed care organizations. Characteristics significantly associated with willingness to participate were solo practice structure, a low percentage of practice revenues from aesthetic surgery, and a very competitive practice environment. Plastic surgeons believed that their colleagues would be even more willing to acquiesce to managed care aesthetic surgery; more than one-third said that 25 to 50 percent of their colleagues would join, and nearly one-third thought that more than half would participate. Plastic surgeons believed that many of their patients would also participate in managed care aesthetic surgery. Twenty-four percent thought that more than half of their patients would choose an aesthetic surgeon through their managed care organization if that organization developed a network for aesthetic surgery. This figure increased to almost 40 percent if the organization would deny coverage for complications resulting from nonpanel surgeons, and to 41 percent if the organization would offer price discounts. This survey shows that most plastic surgeons are against managed care aesthetic surgery. But it also shows that some plastic surgeons will participate, and that most plastic surgeons think many of their colleagues and patients will do likewise. This means that managed care organizations have the potential to make inroads in aesthetic surgery on both the supplier and consumer ends of the market. To prevent managed care from capturing aesthetic surgery, plastic surgeons must anticipate the likely business strategy of managed care. To this end, they must understand the steps involved in the creation of a new service business and offer organized countermeasures against each of them.     

Utilisation of bone allograft by orthopaedic surgeons in Scotland

The use of bone allograft in orthopaedic surgery has been predicted to increase, particularly in joint revision surgery. This has led to a potential problem with supply. Questionnaires were distributed to all 146 Consultant Orthopaedic surgeons working in Scotland in 2000. They were asked to indicate their current usage of bone and tissue allograft, any problems encountered with supply and if alternatives to allograft, such as processed bone, might be used. The questions asked were very similar to those asked in a previous study in 1995 to enable comparisons to be made. Replies were received from 125 Consultants (87%) of whom 93 reported using bone allograft. Forty-one consultants (46%) predicted an increase in their requirement for bone allograft, and 23 (26%) felt they could currently use more bone if this was available. Sixty percent of surgeons would consider using processed bone as an alternative. In comparison with figures from 1995, an increasing number of surgeons are prepared to use processed bone as an alternative to fresh frozen allograft. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The effect of increased plastic surgeon supply on fees for aesthetic surgery: an economic analysis

The size of the plastic surgery workforce has important effects on the financial environment of the specialty. Economic theory predicts that increasing the area supply of surgeons performing aesthetic surgery will result in lower fees for their services. This study tested that theory in the actual aesthetic surgery marketplace. The study examined the ratio of plastic surgeons to the general population of several states. It then traced the aesthetic surgery fees resulting from different densities of area plastic surgeons. This information was economically analyzed to project the fee effects of possible future changes in the number of practicing plastic surgeons. For the states of New York, California, and Texas, there is a proportional decrease in fees as the density of plastic surgeons increases. For example, New York has 34 percent more plastic surgeons proportionally than Texas, and its fees are 30 percent lower in real dollars. Economic analysis can project the fee effects of changing the supply of surgeons performing aesthetic surgery. The analysis reveals that a 30 percent national increase in the supply of plastic surgeons would lower fees by approximately 32 percent. Similarly, if the number of plastic surgeons increases by 50 percent, fees will decrease by approximately 53 percent. However, these fee effects can be mitigated by expanding the demand for aesthetic surgery. In conclusion, the size of the plastic surgery workforce has profound effects on the fees paid for aesthetic surgery, and the magnitude of these effects can be understood, predicted, and optimized using the tools of economics.     

Are plastic surgery advertisements conforming to the ethical codes of the american society of plastic surgeons?

Cosmetic surgeons have increasingly come under fire for using advertisements that may be deceptive or intended for the solicitation of vulnerable consumers. However, aesthetic surgery is a growing business that relies heavily on advertising to survive. To prevent the use of deceptive advertisements, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons has developed a code of ethics for its physician members. We conducted a study to determine the prevalence of cosmetic surgery advertisements considered objectionable by the lay public. These advertisements were published in the Yellow Pages of the 10 largest U.S. cities. Because all of the advertisements in this study contained the American Society of Plastic Surgeons logo, we also determined whether its members are upholding the ethical code of advertising. We asked a convenience sample of 50 participants to rate 104 advertisements using four yes/no questions derived from the code of ethics and one overall yes/no question regarding whether the advertisement was objectionable. We obtained the mean percentage of "yes" responses for each advertisement, from the total sample, for each question. We found that the study participants felt that 25 percent of the advertisements used images of persons or facsimiles that falsely and deceptively created unjustified expectations of favorable results. The participants responded that 22 percent of the advertisements appealed primarily to the layperson's fears, anxieties, or emotional vulnerabilities. In addition, 18 percent of the advertisements were considered to be objectionable. Discretion is currently left up to physicians as to the ethical nature of their advertisements. Although the majority of American Society of Plastic Surgeons members uphold the ethical code of advertising, there are still a substantial number of published advertisements that the average consumer considers to be in violation of this code.     

Analysis of outpatient surgery center safety using an internet-based quality improvement and peer review program

Assessing the quality of care delivered in office-based outpatient surgery centers is difficult because formerly there was no central data collection system. The American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF), in its ongoing effort to assess and improve patient care, has developed an Internet-based quality improvement and peer review program to analyze outcomes for surgery centers it accredits. Reporting is mandatory for all surgeons operating in AAAASF-accredited facilities. Each surgeon must report all unanticipated sequelae and at least six random cases reviewed by an accepted peer review group biannually. A total of 411,670 procedures were analyzed during a 2-year period (from 2001 to 2002). There were 2597 sequelae reported during this period. The most common sequela was hematoma formation following breast augmentation. Infection occurred in 388 cases. Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias were found to occur in a frequency consistent with previous reports. Significant complications (hematoma, hypertensive episode, wound infection, sepsis, and hypotension) were infrequent. A total of 1378 significant sequelae were reported for 411,670 procedures. This calculates to one unanticipated sequela in 299 procedures (an incidence of 0.33 percent). Seven deaths were reported. A death occurred in one in 58,810 procedures (0.0017 percent). The overall risk of death was comparable whether the procedure was performed in an AAAASF-accredited office surgery facility or a hospital surgery facility.This study documents an excellent safety record for surgical procedures performed in accredited office surgery facilities by board-certified surgeons.     

Safety and efficacy in an accredited outpatient plastic surgery facility: a review of 5316 consecutive cases

Advances in medicine have improved the delivery of health care, making it more technologically superior than ever and, at the same time, more complex. Nowhere is this more evident than in the surgical arena. Plastic surgeons are able to perform procedures safely in office-based facilities that were once reserved only for hospital operating rooms or ambulatory surgery centers. Performing procedures in the office is a convenience to both the surgeon and the patient. Some groups have challenged that performing plastic surgery procedures in an office-based facility compromises patient safety. Our study was done to determine whether outcomes are adversely affected by performing plastic surgery procedures in an accredited outpatient surgical center. A retrospective review was performed on 5316 consecutive cases completed between 1995 and 2000 at Dallas Day Surgical Center, Dallas, Texas, an outpatient surgical facility. Most cases were cosmetic procedures. All cases were analyzed for any potential morbidity or mortality. Complications requiring a return to the operating room were determined, as were infection rates. Events leading to inpatient hospitalization were also included. During this 6-year period, 35 complications (0.7 percent) and no deaths were reported. Most complications were secondary to hematoma formation (77 percent). The postoperative infection rate for patients requiring a return to the operating room was 0.11 percent. Seven patients required inpatient hospitalization following their procedure secondary to arrhythmias, angina, and pulmonary emboli. Patient safety must take precedence over cost and convenience. Any monetary savings or time gained is quickly lost if safety is compromised and complications are incurred. The safety profile of the outpatient facility must meet and even exceed that of the traditional hospital-based or ambulatory care facility. After reviewing our experience over the last 6 years that indicated few complications and no deaths, we continue to support the judicious use of accredited outpatient surgical facilities by board-certified plastic surgeons in the management of plastic surgery patients.     

A prospective study of the accuracy of the surgeon's diagnosis and significance of positive margins in nonmelanoma skin cancers

Even with a precise preoperative diagnosis, complete excision of nonmelanoma skin cancer is not always achieved. The conundrum remains the decision for appropriate secondary treatment. Many surgeons, regardless of the nature of the lesion, consider re-excision to be the only option. In a prior 4-year prospective study that ascertained the accuracy of our clinical diagnosis of skin lesions removed in an office setting, one-fifth were found to be malignant and 98 percent (n = 415) of the lesions were nonmelanoma skin cancer. Unfortunately, 65 (15.7 percent) of the malignant nonmelanoma skin cancer lesions had positive margins. The outcome of our management for these specific lesions was followed prospectively over the 7.5 years of this study to determine whether aggressive surgical intervention was justified in every case.Of 65 patients with lesions, early and complete re-excision of margin-positive nonmelanoma skin cancer was performed for 34 (52.3 percent), with residual tumor found in 11 (32.4 percent), followed by a later recurrence in one (2.9 percent). The remaining 31 patients agreed to semiannual office visits, with one (3.2 percent) recurrence in this group. Thus, the overall rate of recurrence for margin-positive nonmelanoma skin cancer was 3.1 percent, with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years (range, 0 to 7.5 years).There were no recurrences for basal cell carcinoma in either treatment group, suggesting that, at least for "simple" primary lesions without confounding risk factors, there is some validity to a "wait and see" attitude, in which treatment of a potential recurrence would be straightforward. Despite our observed infrequent local recurrences of squamous cell cancers (13.3 percent), the small risk of metastases still suggests the appropriateness of complete surgical eradication for these tumors whenever feasible.     

A classification of facial wrinkles.

An increasing number of injectable filler materials for facial wrinkles and folds points to the need for objective measurements of their effectiveness. Patient satisfaction is the goal, but proof of the value of a particular product requires objective measurement. A wrinkle assessment scale was developed as a simple tool for use by plastic surgeons, dermatologists, and aesthetic surgeons who want to assess the changes resulting from injecting filler materials in their patients. By correlating the grade of the wrinkle in the reference photographs with the wrinkle in a patient's face, a classification of 0 to 5 is assigned. Reliability of the scale was assessed by "live" judgment of 76 wrinkles by nine observers. The same rating was given to 92.7 percent of all wrinkles. In a second trial, photographs from 130 wrinkles were presented to eight observers who rated 89.4 percent of all wrinkles equally. A significant correlation of 87 percent was found between subjective ratings and objective wrinkle depth measured by profilometry on 40 silicone impressions. Manufacturers, monitors of clinical trials, health authorities, and most important, patients will benefit from objective data on current and new injectable materials.     

The key to long-term success in liposuction: a guide for plastic surgeons and patients

Patients need to have realistic expectations for a long-term successful body contour result. There are four key elements for long-term successful improvement in body contour, and the patient is responsible for the first three: exercise, a proper diet, and other positive lifestyle changes; and successful body contouring. An extensive survey requesting information about the procedures, areas of liposuction, lifestyle habits, and satisfaction was mailed to 600 patients who had liposuction surgery performed between 1999 and 2003. One hundred and eight surveys were undeliverable and 209 completed surveys were returned (34.8 percent of 600 mailed surveys and 42.5 percent of 492 delivered surveys). Data were analyzed by a binary logistic regression with backward elimination. Weight gain (versus no weight gain) was used as the dependent variable. The results showed that regardless of whether the patient did or did not gain weight, both groups reported being very satisfied (30 percent and 48 percent, respectively) or satisfied (43 percent and 34 percent, respectively) with their procedure. Among the weight gain patients, 72 percent would still have the procedure again, compared with 82 percent of responders who did not gain weight. When asked if they would recommend the procedure to family or friends, 90 percent of responders who did not gain weight would recommend the procedure whereas only 74 percent of responders who did gain weight would recommend the procedure (p < 0.001). Among those patients who gained weight, only 29 percent thought their appearance was excellent or good (compared with 79 percent of those who did not gain weight). Among the 57 percent of patients who did not gain weight, 35 percent report exercising more postoperatively (compared with only 10 percent in the weight gain group, p = 0.002) and 50 percent report eating a healthier diet (22 percent in the weight gain group report eating a healthier diet, p = 0.002). In the weight gain group, 67 percent report no change in their diet regimen and only 17 percent thought their productivity increased (compared with 25 percent among the no weight gain group, p = 0.002). Successful body contouring surgery requires a patient to embrace positive lifestyle habits. The results of this survey have been used to create a quantitative decision-making framework or a "road map" for patients and plastic surgeons to use for navigating toward successful long-term results.     

The economics of plastic surgery practices: trends in income, procedure mix, and volume

Anecdotally, plastic surgeons have complained of working harder for the same or less income in recent years. They also complain of falling fees for reconstructive surgery and increasing competition for cosmetic surgery. This study examined these notions using the best available data. To gain a better understanding of the current plastic surgery market, plastic surgeon incomes, fees, volume, and relative mix of cosmetic and reconstructive surgery were analyzed between the years 1992 and 2002. To gain a broader perspective, plastic surgeon income trends were then compared with those of other medical specialties and of nonmedical professions. The data show that in real dollars, plastic surgeon incomes have remained essentially steady in recent years, despite plastic surgeons increasing their surgery load by an average of 41 percent over the past 10 years. The overall income trend is similar to that of members of other medical specialties and other nonmedical professionals. The average practice percentage of cosmetic surgery was calculated and found to have increased from 27 percent in 1992 to 58 percent in 2002. This most likely can be explained by the findings that real dollar fees collected for cosmetic surgery have decreased very slightly, whereas those for reconstructive procedures have experienced sharp declines. This study demonstrates that plastic surgeons have adjusted their practice profiles in recent years. They have increased their case loads and shifted their practices toward cosmetic surgery, most likely with the goal of maintaining their incomes. The strategy appears to have been successful in the short term. However, with increasing competition and falling prices for cosmetic surgery, it may represent a temporary bulwark for plastic surgeon incomes unless other steps are taken.     

Safety and efficacy of office-based surgery with monitored anesthesia care/sedation in 4778 consecutive plastic surgery procedures

Office-based surgery has several potential benefits over hospital-based surgery, including cost containment, ease of scheduling, and convenience to both patients and surgeons. Scrutiny of office-based surgery by regulators and state-licensing agencies has increased and must be addressed by improved documentation of safety and efficacy. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the authors' office-based plastic surgery, a review was undertaken of 3615 consecutive patients undergoing 4778 outpatient plastic surgery procedures under monitored anesthesia care/sedation in a single office. The charts of 3615 consecutive patients who had undergone office-based surgery with monitored anesthesia care/sedation between May of 1995 and May of 2000 were reviewed. In all cases, the anesthesia protocol used included sedation with midazolam, propofol, and a narcotic administered by a board-certified registered nurse anesthetist with local anesthesia provided by the surgeon. Charts were reviewed for patient profile, types of procedures, multiple procedures, duration of anesthesia, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and complications related to anesthesia. Outcomes measured included death, airway compromise, dyspnea, hypotension, venous thrombosis, pulmonary emboli, protracted nausea and vomiting lasting more than 24 hours, and unplanned hospital admissions. Statistical analyses were performed using the Microsoft Excel program and the SAS package. Results were as follows: 92.3 percent of the patients were female and 7.7 percent were male, with a mean age of 42.7 years (range, 3 to 83 years). Patients underwent aesthetic (95.6 percent) and reconstructive (4.4 percent) plastic surgery procedures. Same-session multiple procedures occurred in 24.8 percent of patients. The vast majority of patients were healthy: 84.3 percent of patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class I, 15.6 percent were class II, and 0.1 percent were class III. The operations required a mean of 111 minutes. There were no deaths, ventilator requirements, deep venous thromboses, or pulmonary emboli. Complications were as follows: 0.05 percent (n = 2) of patients had dyspnea that resolved, 0.2 percent (n = 6) of patients had protracted nausea and vomiting, and 0.05 percent (n = 2) of patients had unplanned hospital admissions (<24 hours). One patient had an emergent intubation. No prolonged adverse effects were noted. There was a 30-day follow-up minimum. Outpatient surgery is an important aspect of plastic surgery. It was shown that office-based surgery with intravenous sedation, performed by board-certified plastic surgeons and nurse anesthetists, is safe. Appropriate accreditation, safe anesthesia protocols, and proper patient selection constitute the basis for safe and efficacious office-based outpatient plastic surgery.     

Plastic surgery and psychotherapy in the treatment of 100 psychologically disturbed patients

This paper reviews the senior author's long-term experience with the surgical-psychiatric treatment of 100 aesthetic surgery patients with significant psychological disturbances. Patients with psychological disturbances of a magnitude generally considered an "absolute contraindication" for surgery were operated on and later assessed to determine the psychological impact of surgery. Patient follow-up averaged 6.2 years (maximum follow-up 25.7 years). Of the 87 patients who underwent operation (7 patients were refused surgery and 6 voluntarily deferred surgery), 82.8 percent had a positive psychological outcome, 13.8 percent experienced "minimal" improvement from surgery, and 3.4 percent were negatively affected by surgery. There were no lawsuits, suicides, or psychotic decompensations. Patients with severe psychological disturbances frequently benefited from combined surgical-psychiatric treatment designed to address the patient's profound sense of deformity. This study suggests that plastic surgeons are "passing up" a significant number of patients who may be helped by combined surgical-psychological intervention.     

Can nocturnal emergency surgery be reduced?

A prospective study of emergency operations was performed over three months in a district general hospital. Before starting surgery surgeons completed a questionnaire recording clinical details together with time of admission and were asked to state whether in their opinion the case could be safely deferred until the next morning assuming operating time was available. Of 251 operations performed, forms were completed for 244. According to the surgeons, 62 could have been safely deferred, and subsequent independent analysis indicated a further 24 could also have been safely postponed, giving a total of 86 cases (35%). Of the remainder, 71 were started between 2300 and 0900, and of these 51 (71%) were major operations requiring an experienced surgeon. The results suggest that, although the volume of nocturnal major surgery could not be reduced, the introduction of a daily emergency theatre session for cases seen during the day and those which could be deferred from the previous night would appreciably reduce the overall workload of nocturnal surgery at present done by the resident junior staff. This study will have important implications if, as has been suggested, the number of junior medical staff on call at night for emergencies is reduced.