Swapping the domains of exoribonucleases RNase II and RNase R: conferring upon RNase II the ability to degrade ds RNA

RNase II and RNase R are the two E. coli exoribonucleases that belong to the RNase II super family of enzymes. They degrade RNA hydrolytically in the 3' to 5' direction in a processive and sequence independent manner. However, while RNase R is capable of degrading structured RNAs, the RNase II activity is impaired by dsRNAs. The final end-product of these two enzymes is also different, being 4 nt for RNase II and 2 nt for RNase R. RNase II and RNase R share structural properties, including 60% of amino acid sequence similarity and have a similar modular domain organization: two N-terminal cold shock domains (CSD1 and CSD2), one central RNB catalytic domain, and one C-terminal S1 domain. We have constructed hybrid proteins by swapping the domains between RNase II and RNase R to determine which are the responsible for the differences observed between RNase R and RNase II. The results obtained show that the S1 and RNB domains from RNase R in an RNase II context allow the degradation of double-stranded substrates and the appearance of the 2 nt long end-product. Moreover, the degradation of structured RNAs becomes tail-independent when the RNB domain from RNase R is no longer associated with the RNA binding domains (CSD and S1) of the genuine protein. Finally, we show that the RNase R C-terminal Lysine-rich region is involved in the degradation of double-stranded substrates in an RNase II context, probably by unwinding the substrate before it enters into the catalytic cavity.     

The role of the S1 domain in exoribonucleolytic activity: substrate specificity and multimerization

RNase II is a 3'-5' exoribonuclease that processively hydrolyzes single-stranded RNA generating 5' mononucleotides. This enzyme contains a catalytic core that is surrounded by three RNA-binding domains. At its C terminus, there is a typical S1 domain that has been shown to be critical for RNA binding. The S1 domain is also present in the other major 3'-5' exoribonucleases from Escherichia coli: RNase R and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). In this report, we examined the involvement of the S1 domain in the different abilities of these three enzymes to overcome RNA secondary structures during degradation. Hybrid proteins were constructed by replacing the S1 domain of RNase II for the S1 from RNase R and PNPase, and their exonucleolytic activity and RNA-binding ability were examined. The results revealed that both the S1 domains of RNase R and PNPase are able to partially reverse the drop of RNA-binding ability and exonucleolytic activity resulting from removal of the S1 domain of RNase II. Moreover, the S1 domains investigated are not equivalent. Furthermore, we demonstrate that S1 is neither responsible for the ability to overcome secondary structures during RNA degradation, nor is it related to the size of the final product generated by each enzyme. In addition, we show that the S1 domain from PNPase is able to induce the trimerization of the RNaseII-PNP hybrid protein, indicating that this domain can have a role in the biogenesis of multimers.     

Insights into How RNase R Degrades Structured RNA: Analysis of the Nuclease Domain

RNase R readily degrades highly structured RNA, whereas its paralogue, RNase II, is unable to do so. Furthermore, the nuclease domain of RNase R, devoid of all canonical RNA-binding domains, is sufficient for this activity. RNase R also binds RNA more tightly within its catalytic channel than does RNase II, which is thought to be important for its unique catalytic properties. To investigate this idea further, certain residues within the nuclease domain channel of RNase R were changed to those found in RNase II. Among the many examined, we identified one amino acid residue, R572, that has a significant role in the properties of RNase R. Conversion of this residue to lysine, as found in RNase II, results in weaker substrate binding within the nuclease domain channel, longer limit products, increased activity against a variety of substrates and a faster substrate on-rate. Most importantly, the mutant encounters difficulty in degrading structured RNA, pausing within a double-stranded region. Additional studies show that degradation of structured substrates is dependent upon temperature, suggesting a role for thermal breathing in the mechanism of action of RNase R. On the basis of these data, we propose a model in which tight binding within the nuclease domain allows RNase R to capitalize on the natural thermal breathing of an RNA duplex to degrade structured RNAs.     

Structure of the active subunit of the yeast exosome core, Rrp44: diverse modes of substrate recruitment in the RNase II nuclease family

The eukaryotic exosome is a macromolecular complex essential for RNA processing and decay. It has recently been shown that the RNase activity of the yeast exosome core can be mapped to a single subunit, Rrp44, which processively degrades single-stranded RNAs as well as RNAs containing secondary structures. Here we present the 2.3 A resolution crystal structure of S. cerevisiae Rrp44 in complex with single-stranded RNA. Although Rrp44 has a linear domain organization similar to bacterial RNase II, in three dimensions the domains have a different arrangement. The three domains of the classical nucleic-acid-binding OB fold are positioned on the catalytic domain such that the RNA-binding path observed in RNase II is occluded. Instead, RNA is threaded to the catalytic site via an alternative route suggesting a mechanism for RNA-duplex unwinding. The structure provides a molecular rationale for the observed biochemical properties of the RNase R family of nucleases.     

RNA-binding strategies common to cold-shock domain- and RNA recognition motif-containing proteins

Numerous RNA-binding proteins have modular structures, comprising one or several copies of a selective RNA-binding domain generally coupled to an auxiliary domain that binds RNA non-specifically. We have built and compared homology-based models of the cold-shock domain (CSD) of the Xenopus protein, FRGY2, and of the third RNA recognition motif (RRM) of the ubiquitous nucleolar protein, nucleolin. Our model of the CSD_FRG–RNA complex constitutes the first prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a CSD–RNA complex and is consistent with the hypothesis of a convergent evolution of CSD and RRM towards a related single-stranded RNA-binding surface. Circular dichroism spectroscopy studies have revealed that these RNA-binding domains are capable of orchestrating similar types of RNA conformational change. Our results further show that the respective auxiliary domains, despite their lack of sequence homology, are functionally equivalent and indispensable for modulating the properties of the specific RNA-binding domains. A comparative analysis of FRGY2 and nucleolin C-terminal domains has revealed common structural features representing the signature of a particular type of auxiliary domain, which has co-evolved with the CSD and the RRM.     

The Roles of Individual Domains of RNase R in Substrate Binding and Exoribonuclease Activity: THE NUCLEASE DOMAIN IS SUFFICIENT FOR DIGESTION OF STRUCTURED RNA*

RNase R and RNase II are the two representatives from the RNR family of processive, 3′ to 5′ exoribonucleases in Escherichia coli. Although RNase II is specific for single-stranded RNA, RNase R readily degrades through structured RNA. Furthermore, RNase R appears to be the only known 3′ to 5′ exoribonuclease that is able to degrade through double-stranded RNA without the aid of a helicase activity. Consequently, its functional domains and mechanism of action are of great interest. Using a series of truncated RNase R proteins we show that the cold-shock and S1 domains contribute to substrate binding. The cold-shock domains appear to play a role in substrate recruitment, whereas the S1 domain is most likely required to position substrates for efficient catalysis. Most importantly, the nuclease domain alone, devoid of the cold-shock and S1 domains, is sufficient for RNase R to bind and degrade structured RNAs. Moreover, this is a unique property of the nuclease domain of RNase R because this domain in RNase II stalls as it approaches a duplex. We also show that the nuclease domain of RNase R binds RNA more tightly than the nuclease domain of RNase II. This tighter binding may help to explain the difference in catalytic properties between RNase R and RNase II.Ribonucleases (RNases) play important roles in RNA metabolism. They are responsible for the maturation of stable RNA and the degradation of RNA molecules that are defective or no longer required by the cell. Both maturation and degradation are initiated by endoribonucleolytic cleavage(s) and completed by the action of exoribonucleases (1). In Escherichia coli, three, relatively nonspecific, 3′ to 5′ processive exoribonucleases are responsible for degradation of RNA: RNase II, RNase R, and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase).³ RNase II and PNPase appear to be primarily responsible for mRNA decay (2), although their precise functions may differ (3). However, mRNAs containing extensive secondary structure, such as repetitive extragenic palindromic sequences, are degraded by PNPase (4, 5) or RNase R (5). Likewise, degradation of highly structured regions of rRNA (6) and tRNA (7),⁴ is carried out by PNPase and/or RNase R. These findings suggest that PNPase and RNase R are the universal degraders of structured RNAs in vivo, leaving RNase II to act on relatively unstructured RNAs.Whether or not an RNase acts upon a particular RNA appears to depend upon the specificity of the RNase and the accessibility of the RNA to that RNase (1). Purified RNase R readily degrades both single- and double-stranded RNA molecules (5, 8), and it is the only known 3′ to 5′ exoribonuclease able to degrade through double-stranded RNA without the aid of helicase activity. To degrade RNA molecules containing double-stranded regions, RNase R requires a 3′ single-stranded overhang at least 5 nucleotides long to serve as a binding site from which degradation can be initiated (5, 8, 9).⁵ How RNase R then proceeds through the RNA duplex is of great interest. An important step toward elucidating the mechanism of action of RNase R is to determine the contribution that each of its domains makes to substrate binding and exoribonuclease activity.Despite differences in their physiological roles and intrinsic substrate specificities, RNase R and RNase II both belong to the widely distributed RNR family of exoribonucleases (10–12). RNR family members are all large multidomain proteins with processive 3′ to 5′ hydrolytic exoribonuclease activity that share a common linear domain organization. RNase R contains two cold-shock domains (CSD1 and CSD2) near its N terminus, a central nuclease, or RNB domain, an S1 domain near the C terminus, and a low complexity, highly basic region at the C terminus (Fig. 1A). The nuclease domain contains four highly conserved sequence motifs (10, 11). Motif I contains four conserved aspartate residues that are thought to coordinate two divalent metal ions that facilitate a two-metal ion mechanism similar to that of DEDD family exoribonucleases and the proofreading domains of many polymerases (13, 14). CSDs (15–17) and S1 domains (18, 19) are well known examples of RNA-binding domains. Interestingly, there are reports that both of these domains can act as nucleic acid chaperones and unwind RNA (20–29), providing a possible explanation for the ability of RNase R to degrade structured RNAs. The role of the basic region at the C terminus of RNase R is unknown, but it may act as an RNA-binding domain and/or a mediator of protein-protein interactions.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Linear domain organization of RNase R and RNase II proteins. The CSDs are colored in cyan and blue for CSD1 and CSD2, respectively, the nuclease domains are in green, the S1 domains are red, and the low complexity, highly basic region, found in RNase R only, is in magenta. A, RNase R. RNase R full-length is the full-length wild-type RNase R protein. RNase RΔCSDs lacks both CSD1 and CSD2. RNase RΔBasic is missing the low complexity, highly basic region. RNase RΔS1 is missing both the S1 domain and the low complexity, highly basic region. RNase RΔCSDsΔS1 consists of the nuclease domain alone. B, RNase II. RNase II full-length is the full-length wild-type RNase II protein. RNase IIΔCSDsΔS1 contains the nuclease domain alone.Crystal structures of E. coli wild-type RNase II and a D209N catalytic site mutant in complex with single-stranded RNA have recently been solved (14, 30). In these structures the two CSDs and the S1 domain come together to form an RNA-binding clamp that directs RNA to the catalytic center at the base of a narrow, basic channel within the nuclease domain (14, 30). Only single-stranded RNA can be accommodated by the RNA-binding clamp and the nuclease domain channel, which explains the single strand specificity of RNase II. It is expected that RNase R will adopt a similar structure.In this study, we determine the contribution that each of the domains of RNase R makes to RNA-binding and exoribonuclease activity. We show that the CSDs and the S1 domain are important for substrate binding, although their roles differ. Of most interest, we show that the nuclease domain alone of RNase R is sufficient to degrade through double-stranded RNA, whereas the nuclease domain of RNase II is unable to carry out this reaction. The nuclease domain of RNase R also binds RNA more tightly, which may explain the difference in catalytic properties between RNase R and RNase II.     

Structural basis for processivity and single-strand specificity of RNase II

RNase II is a member of the widely distributed RNR family of exoribonucleases, which are highly processive 3'-->5' hydrolytic enzymes that play an important role in mRNA decay. Here, we report the crystal structure of E. coli RNase II, which reveals an architecture reminiscent of the RNA exosome. Three RNA-binding domains come together to form a clamp-like assembly, which can only accommodate single-stranded RNA. This leads into a narrow, basic channel that ends at the putative catalytic center that is completely enclosed within the body of the protein. The putative path for RNA agrees well with biochemical data indicating that a 3' single strand overhang of 7-10 nt is necessary for binding and hydrolysis by RNase II. The presence of the clamp and the narrow channel provides an explanation for the processivity of RNase II and for why its action is limited to single-stranded RNA.     

Investigating the structure of human RNase H1 by site-directed mutagenesis

In this study we examine for the first time the roles of the various domains of human RNase H1 by site-directed mutagenesis. The carboxyl terminus of human RNase H1 is highly conserved with Escherichia coli RNase H1 and contains the amino acid residues of the putative catalytic site and basic substrate-binding domain of the E. coli RNase enzyme. The amino terminus of human RNase H1 contains a structure consistent with a double-strand RNA (dsRNA) binding motif that is separated from the conserved E. coli RNase H1 region by a 62-amino acid sequence. These studies showed that although the conserved amino acid residues of the putative catalytic site and basic substrate-binding domain are required for RNase H activity, deletion of either the catalytic site or the basic substrate-binding domain did not ablate binding to the heteroduplex substrate. Deletion of the region between the dsRNA-binding domain and the conserved E. coli RNase H1 domain resulted in a significant loss in the RNase H activity. Furthermore, the binding affinity of this deletion mutant for the heteroduplex substrate was approximately 2-fold tighter than the wild-type enzyme suggesting that this central 62-amino acid region does not contribute to the binding affinity of the enzyme for the substrate. The dsRNA-binding domain was not required for RNase H activity, as the dsRNA-deletion mutants exhibited catalytic rates approximately 2-fold faster than the rate observed for wild-type enzyme. Comparison of the dissociation constant of human RNase H1 and the dsRNA-deletion mutant for the heteroduplex substrate indicates that the deletion of this region resulted in a 5-fold loss in binding affinity. Finally, comparison of the cleavage patterns exhibited by the mutant proteins with the cleavage pattern for the wild-type enzyme indicates that the dsRNA-binding domain is responsible for the observed strong positional preference for cleavage exhibited by human RNase H1.     

Interactions of a Pop5/Rpp1 heterodimer with the catalytic domain of RNase MRP

Ribonuclease (RNase) MRP is a multicomponent ribonucleoprotein complex closely related to RNase P. RNase MRP and eukaryotic RNase P share most of their protein components, as well as multiple features of their catalytic RNA moieties, but have distinct substrate specificities. While RNase P is practically universally found in all three domains of life, RNase MRP is essential in eukaryotes. The structural organizations of eukaryotic RNase P and RNase MRP are poorly understood. Here, we show that Pop5 and Rpp1, protein components found in both RNase P and RNase MRP, form a heterodimer that binds directly to the conserved area of the putative catalytic domain of RNase MRP RNA. The Pop5/Rpp1 binding site corresponds to the protein binding site in bacterial RNase P RNA. Structural and evolutionary roles of the Pop5/Rpp1 heterodimer in RNases P and MRP are discussed.     

Structural characterization of the RNase E S1 domain and identification of its oligonucleotide-binding and dimerization interfaces

S1 domains occur in four of the major enzymes of mRNA decay in Escherichia coli: RNase E, PNPase, RNase II, and RNase G. Here, we report the structure of the S1 domain of RNase E, determined by both X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. The RNase E S1 domain adopts an OB-fold, very similar to that found with PNPase and the major cold shock proteins, in which flexible loops are appended to a well-ordered five-stranded beta-barrel core. Within the crystal lattice, the protein forms a dimer stabilized primarily by intermolecular hydrophobic packing. Consistent with this observation, light-scattering, chemical crosslinking, and NMR spectroscopic measurements confirm that the isolated RNase E S1 domain undergoes a specific monomer-dimer equilibrium in solution with a K(D) value in the millimolar range. The substitution of glycine 66 with serine dramatically destabilizes the folded structure of this domain, thereby providing an explanation for the temperature-sensitive phenotype associated with this mutation in full-length RNase E. Based on amide chemical shift perturbation mapping, the binding surface for a single-stranded DNA dodecamer (K(D)=160(+/-40)microM) was identified as a groove of positive electrostatic potential containing several exposed aromatic side-chains. This surface, which corresponds to the conserved ligand-binding cleft found in numerous OB-fold proteins, lies distal to the dimerization interface, such that two independent oligonucleotide-binding sites can exist in the dimeric form of the RNase E S1 domain. Based on these data, we propose that the S1 domain serves a dual role of dimerization to aid in the formation of the tetrameric quaternary structure of RNase E as described by Callaghan et al. in 2003 and of substrate binding to facilitate RNA hydrolysis by the adjacent catalytic domains within this multimeric enzyme.     

Function of the conserved S1 and KH domains in polynucleotide phosphorylase

We have examined the roles of the conserved S1 and KH RNA binding motifs in the widely dispersed prokaryotic exoribonuclease polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). These domains can be released from the enzyme by mild proteolysis or by truncation of the gene. Using purified recombinant enzymes, we have assessed the effects of specific deletions on RNA binding, on activity against a synthetic substrate under multiple-turnover conditions, and on the ability of truncated forms of PNPase to form a minimal RNA degradosome with RNase E and RhlB. Deletion of the S1 domain reduces the apparent activity of the enzyme by almost 70-fold under low-ionic-strength conditions and limits the enzyme to digest a single substrate molecule. Activity and product release are substantially regained at higher ionic strengths. This deletion also reduces the affinity of the enzyme for RNA, without affecting the enzyme's ability to bind to RNase E. Deletion of the KH domain produces similar, but less severe, effects, while deletion of both the S1 and KH domains accentuates the loss of activity, product release, and RNA binding but has no effect on binding to RNase E. We propose that the S1 domain, possibly arrayed with the KH domain, forms an RNA binding surface that facilitates substrate recognition and thus indirectly potentiates product release. The present data as well as prior observations can be rationalized by a two-step model for substrate binding.     

The structure and enzymatic properties of a novel RNase II family enzyme from Deinococcus radiodurans

Exoribonucleases are vital in nearly all aspects of RNA metabolism, including RNA maturation, end-turnover, and degradation. RNase II and RNase R are paralogous members of the RNR superfamily of nonspecific, 3'→5', processive exoribonucleases. In Escherichia coli, RNase II plays a primary role in mRNA decay and has a preference for unstructured RNA. RNase R, in contrast, is capable of digesting structured RNA and plays a role in the degradation of both mRNA and stable RNA. Deinococcus radiodurans, a radiation-resistant bacterium, contains two RNR family members. The shorter of these, DrR63, includes a sequence signature typical of RNase R, but we show here that this enzyme is an RNase II-type exonuclease and cannot degrade structured RNA. We also report the crystal structure of this protein, now termed DrII. The DrII structure reveals a truncated RNA binding region in which the N-terminal cold shock domains, typical of most RNR family nucleases, are replaced by an unusual winged helix-turn-helix domain, where the "wing" is contributed by the C-terminal S1 domain. Consistent with its truncated RNA binding region, DrII is able to remove 3' overhangs from RNA molecules closer to duplexes than do other RNase II-type enzymes. DrII also displays distinct sensitivity to pyrimidine-rich regions of single-stranded RNA and is able to process tRNA precursors with adenosine-rich 3' extensions in vitro. These data indicate that DrII is the RNase II of D. radiodurans and that its structure and catalytic properties are distinct from those of other related enzymes.     

Polynucleotide phosphorylase interacts with ribonuclease E through a betabetaalphabetabetaalpha domain

In the present work we have used a double-hybrid assay in bacteria to identify a putative domain in E. coli PNPase required for in vivo interaction with RNase E. We used a 202 aa fragment of RNase E previously reported as the PNPase binding domain in this enzyme and a collection of 13 different fragments of 105 aa, spanning the entire sequence of 734 aa PNPase (GenBank Accession number NP_417633). Our results indicate that two clones of PNPase including residues 158-262 and residues 473-577 contain interaction sites for RNase E within a betabetaalphabetabetaalpha domain configuration. Three-dimensional modeling of the E. coli PNPase based on the S. antibioticus protein structure indicates that the putative binding domain is located on the monomer surface, facing outward from the trimeric tertiary structure. Since a copy of the betabetaalphabetabetaalpha domain is also found in RNase PH, we investigated and found an interaction with RNase E in a pull-down assay. We suggest this interaction takes place through the similar betabetaalphabetabetaalpha domain present in the tertiary structure of this enzyme. Based on these results, we propose that RNase PH and RNase E could form functional assemblies in E. coli.     

Crystal structure of Caulobacter crescentus polynucleotide phosphorylase reveals a mechanism of RNA substrate channelling and RNA degradosome assembly

Polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is an exoribonuclease that cleaves single-stranded RNA substrates with 3'-5' directionality and processive behaviour. Its ring-like, trimeric architecture creates a central channel where phosphorolytic active sites reside. One face of the ring is decorated with RNA-binding K-homology (KH) and S1 domains, but exactly how these domains help to direct the 3' end of single-stranded RNA substrates towards the active sites is an unsolved puzzle. Insight into this process is provided by our crystal structures of RNA-bound and apo Caulobacter crescentus PNPase. In the RNA-free form, the S1 domains adopt a 'splayed' conformation that may facilitate capture of RNA substrates. In the RNA-bound structure, the three KH domains collectively close upon the RNA and direct the 3' end towards a constricted aperture at the entrance of the central channel. The KH domains make non-equivalent interactions with the RNA, and there is a marked asymmetry within the catalytic core of the enzyme. On the basis of these data, we propose that structural non-equivalence, induced upon RNA binding, helps to channel substrate to the active sites through mechanical ratcheting. Structural and biochemical analyses also reveal the basis for PNPase association with RNase E in the multi-enzyme RNA degradosome assembly of the α-proteobacteria.     

A case of convergent evolution of nucleic acid binding modules

Divergent evolution can explain how many proteins containing structurally similar domains, which perform a variety of related functions, have evolved from a relatively small number of modules or protein domains. However, it cannot explain how protein domains with similar, but distinguishable, functions and similar, but distinguishable, structures have evolved. Examples of this are the RNA-binding proteins containing the RNA-binding domain (RBD), and a newly established protein group, the cold-shock domain (CSD) protein family. Both protein domains contain conserved RNP motifs on similar single-stranded nucleic acid-binding surfaces. Apart from the RNP motifs, which have a similar function, the two families show little similarity in topology or amino acid sequence. This can be considered an interesting example of convergent evolution at the molecular level. Previously, a β-sheet surface was found to interact with RNA in non-homologous proteins from yeast, phage and man, revealing that this mode of RNA binding may be a widely recurring theme.     

Two distinct regions on the surface of an RNA-binding domain are crucial for RNase E function

Despite its importance for RNA processing and degradation in Escherichia coli, little is known about the structure of RNase E or its mechanism of action. We have modelled the three-dimensional structure of an essential amino-terminal domain of RNase E on the basis of its sequence homology to the S1 family of RNA-binding domains. Each of the five surface-exposed aromatic residues and most of the 14 basic residues of this RNase E domain were replaced with alanine to determine their importance for RNase E function. All the surface residues essential for cell growth and feedback regulation of RNase E synthesis mapped to one end of the domain. In vitro assays indicate that these essential residues fall into two functionally distinct groups that form discrete clusters on opposite faces of the S1 domain. One group, comprising Phe-57, Phe-67 and Lys-112 [corrected], is of general importance for the ribonuclease activity of RNase E, whereas the other group, comprising Lys-37 and Tyr-60, is entirely dispensable for catalytic activity in vitro. The side-chains of two residues previously identified as sites of temperature-sensitive mutations lie buried directly beneath the surface region defined by Phe-57, Phe-67 and Lys-112 [corrected], which probably enhances RNase E activity by making a crucial contribution to the binding of substrate RNAs. In contrast to the S1 domain, an arginine-rich RNA-binding domain in the carboxyl half of RNase E appears to have a more peripheral role in RNase E function, as it is not required for feedback regulation, cell growth or ribonuclease activity.     

Crystal structure of Bacillus anthracis ThiI, a tRNA-modifying enzyme containing the predicted RNA-binding THUMP domain

ThiI is an enzyme responsible for the formation of the modified base S(4)U (4-thiouridine) found at position 8 in some prokaryotic tRNAs. This base acts as a sensitive trigger for the response mechanism to UV exposure, providing protection against its damaging effects. We present the crystal structure of Bacillus anthracis ThiI in complex with AMP, revealing an extended tripartite architecture in which an N-terminal ferredoxin-like domain (NFLD) connects the C-terminal catalytic PP-loop pyrophosphatase domain with a THUMP domain, an ancient predicted RNA-binding domain that is widespread in all kingdoms of life. We describe the structure of the THUMP domain, which appears to be unrelated to RNA-binding domains of known structure. Mapping the conserved residues of NFLD and the THUMP domain onto the ThiI structure suggests that these domains jointly form the tRNA-binding surface. The inaccessibility of U8 in the canonical L-shaped form of tRNA, and the existence of a glycine-rich linker joining the catalytic and RNA-binding moieties of ThiI suggest that structural changes may occur in both molecules upon binding.     

Trypanosoma brucei: functions of RBP16 cold shock and RGG domains in macromolecular interactions

The RNA binding protein RBP16 regulates mitochondrial RNA editing and stability in Trypanosoma brucei. To aid in understanding the biochemical mechanisms of RBP16 function, we analyzed the RNA and protein binding capacity of RBP16 and its individual cold shock (CSD) and RGG domains. Both recombinantly expressed domains possess RNA binding activity. However, the specificity and affinity of RBP16 for gRNA is mediated predominantly through the interaction of the CSD with poly(U). The RGG domain contributes to the association between full length RBP16 and gRNA, as it was required for maximal binding. We further demonstrate that both domains contribute to maximal binding of RBP16 to the mitochondrial p22 protein. However, p22 can interact with the CSD alone and stimulate its gRNA binding activity. Thus, the CSD is primary in RBP16 interactions, while the RGG domain enhances the capacity of the CSD to bind both RNA and protein. These results suggest a model for RBP16 molecular interactions.     

Identification of the NAD(+)-binding fold of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as a novel RNA-binding domain

There is growing evidence that metabolic enzymes may act as multifunctional proteins performing diverse roles in cellular metabolism. Among these functions are the RNA-binding activities of NAD(+)-dependent dehydrogenases. Previously, we have characterized the glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an RNA-binding protein with preference to adenine-uracil-rich sequences. In this study, we used GST-GAPDH fusion proteins generated by deletion mutagenesis to search for the RNA binding domain. We established that the N-terminal 43 amino acid residues of GAPDH, which correspond to the first mononucleotide-binding domain of the NAD(+)-binding fold is sufficient to confer RNA-binding. We also provide evidence that this single domain, although it retains most of the RNA-binding activity, loses sequence specificity. Our results suggest a molecular basis for RNA-recognition by NAD(+)-dependent dehydrogenases and (di)nucleotide-binding metabolic enzymes that had been reported to have RNA-binding activity with different specificity. To support this prediction we also identified other members of the family of NAD(+)-dependent dehydrogenases with no previous history of nucleic acid binding as RNA binding proteins in vitro. Based on our findings we propose the addition of the NAD(+)-binding domain to the list of RNA binding domains/motifs.