114 Kinetic and thermodynamic basis for damaged bases excision by 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylases

DNA glycosylases play the opening act in a highly conserved process for excision of damaged bases from DNA called the base excision repair pathway. DNA glycosylases attend to a wide variety of lesions arising from both endogenous and exogenous factors. The types of damage include alkylation, oxidation, and hydrolysis. A major DNA oxidation product is 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), a base with a high mutagenic potential. In bacteria, this lesion is repaired by formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg), while in the case of humans this function belongs to 8-oxoG-DNA glycosylase (OGG1). We have attempted a comprehensive characterization of 8-oxoG recognition by DNA glycosylases. First, we have obtained thermodynamic parameters for melting of DNA duplexes containing 8-oxoG in all possible nucleotide contexts. The energy of stacking interactions of 8-oxoG was in strict dependence on 8-oxoG nucleotide environment, which may affect the recognition of damage and the efficiency of eversion of 8-oxoG from DNA helix by glycosylases. Next, we established how the flexibility of DNA context affects damage recognition by these enzymes (Kirpota et al., 2011). Then, we have found that DNA containing 8-oxoG next to a single-strand break provides a good substrate for Fpg, as soon as all structural phosphate residues are maintained. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we have addressed the functions of many previously unstudied amino acid residuess that were predicted to be important for Fpg activity by molecular dynamics simulation and phylogenetic analysis. Of note, many substitutions abolished the excision of 8-oxoG, but did not affect the cleavage efficiency of abasic substrates. Finally, we investigated the contribution of separated structural domains of Fpg to specific enzyme-substrate interaction. Surprisingly, despite the absence of the catalytic domain, C-terminal domain of Fpg possessed a low- residual ability to recognize and cleave abasic substrates. Our study sheds light on mechanism details of Fpg and OGG1 activity, with the ultimate goal of understanding how binding energy can be spent by these enzymes for catalysis.     

Ionic strength and magnesium affect the specificity of Escherichia coli and human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylases

An abundant oxidative lesion, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine (8-oxoG), often directs the misincorporation of dAMP during replication. To prevent mutations, cells possess an enzymatic system for the removal of 8-oxoG. A key element of this system is 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg in bacteria, OGG1 in eukaryotes), which must excise 8-oxoG from 8-oxoG:C pairs but not from 8-oxoG:A. We investigated the influence of various factors, including ionic strength, the presence of Mg(2+) and organic anions, polyamides, crowding agents and two small heterocyclic compounds (biotin and caffeine) on the activity and opposite-base specificity of Escherichia coli Fpg and human OGG1. The activity of both enzymes towards 8-oxoG:A decreased sharply with increasing salt and Mg(2+) concentration, whereas the activity on 8-oxoG:C was much more stable, resulting in higher opposite-base specificity when salt and Mg(2+) were at near-physiological concentrations. This tendency was observed with both Cl(-) and glutamate as the major anions in the reaction mixture. Kinetic and binding parameters for the processing of 8-oxoG:C and 8-oxoG:A by Fpg and OGG1 were determined under several different conditions. Polyamines, crowding agents, biotin and caffeine affected the activity and specificity of Fpg or OGG1 only marginally. We conclude that, in the intracellular environment, the specificity of Fpg and OGG1 for 8-oxoG:C versus 8-oxoG:A is mostly due to high ionic strength and Mg(2+).     

Recognition of the oxidized lesions spiroiminodihydantoin and guanidinohydantoin in DNA by the mammalian base excision repair glycosylases NEIL1 and NEIL2

8-Oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is an unstable mutagenic DNA lesion that is prone to further oxidation. High valent metals such as Cr(V) and Ir(IV) readily oxidize 8-oxoG to form guanidinohydantoin (Gh), its isomer iminoallantoin (Ia), and spiroiminodihydantoin (Sp). When present in DNA, these lesions show enhanced base misincorporation over the parent 8-oxoG lesion leading to G --> T and G --> C transversion mutations and polymerase arrest. These findings suggested that further oxidized lesions of 8-oxoG are more mutagenic and toxic than 8-oxoG itself. Repair of oxidatively damaged bases, including Sp and Gh/Ia, are initiated by the base excision repair (BER) system that involves the DNA glycosylases Fpg, Nei, and Nth in E. coli. Mammalian homologs of two of these BER enzymes, OGG1 and NTH1, have little or no affinity for Gh/Ia and Sp. Herein we report that two recently identified mammalian glycosylases, NEIL1 and NEIL2, showed a high affinity for recognition and cleavage of DNA containing Gh/Ia and Sp lesions. NEIL1 and NEIL2 recognized both of these lesions in single-stranded DNA and catalyzed the removal of the lesions through a beta- and delta-elimination mechanism. NEIL1 and NEIL2 also recognized and excised the Gh/Ia lesion opposite all four natural bases in double-stranded DNA. NEIL1 was able to excise the Sp lesion opposite the four natural bases in double-stranded DNA, however, NEIL2 showed little cleavage activity against the Sp lesion in duplex DNA although DNA trapping studies show recognition and binding of NEIL2 to this lesion. This work suggests that NEIL1 and NEIL2 are essential in the recognition of further oxidized lesions arising from 8-oxoG and implies that these BER glycosylases may play an important role in the repair of DNA damage induced by carcinogenic metals.     

Human DNA glycosylases of the bacterial Fpg/MutM superfamily: an alternative pathway for the repair of 8-oxoguanine and other oxidation products in DNA

The mild phenotype associated with targeted disruption of the mouse OGG1 and NTH1 genes has been attributed to the existence of back-up activities and/or alternative pathways for the removal of oxidised DNA bases. We have characterised two new genes in human cells that encode DNA glycosylases, homologous to the bacterial Fpg (MutM)/Nei class of enzymes, capable of removing lesions that are substrates for both hOGG1 and hNTH1. One gene, designated HFPG1, showed ubiquitous expression in all tissues examined whereas the second gene, HFPG2, was only expressed at detectable levels in the thymus and testis. Transient transfections of HeLa cells with fusions of the cDNAs to EGFP revealed intracellular sorting to the nucleus with accumulation in the nucleoli for hFPG1, while hFPG2 co-localised with the 30 kDa subunit of RPA. hFPG1 was purified and shown to act on DNA substrates containing 8-oxoguanine, 5-hydroxycytosine and abasic sites. Removal of 8-oxoguanine, but not cleavage at abasic sites, was opposite base-dependent, with 8-oxoG:C being the preferred substrate and negligible activity towards 8-oxoG:A. It thus appears that hFPG1 has properties similar to mammalian OGG1 in preventing mutations arising from misincorporation of A across 8-oxoG and could function as a back-up repair activity for OGG1 in ogg1(-/-) mice.     

Plant and fungal Fpg homologs are formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylases but not 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylases

Formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg) and endonuclease VIII (Nei) share an overall common three-dimensional structure and primary amino acid sequence in conserved structural motifs but have different substrate specificities, with bacterial Fpg proteins recognizing formamidopyrimidines, 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) and its oxidation products guanidinohydantoin (Gh), and spiroiminodihydantoin (Sp) and bacterial Nei proteins recognizing primarily damaged pyrimidines. In addition to bacteria, Fpg has also been found in plants, while Nei is sparsely distributed among the prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Phylogenetic analysis of Fpg and Nei DNA glycosylases demonstrated, with 95% bootstrap support, a clade containing exclusively sequences from plants and fungi. Members of this clade exhibit sequence features closer to bacterial Fpg proteins than to any protein designated as Nei based on biochemical studies. The Candida albicans (Cal) Fpg DNA glycosylase and a previously studied Arabidopsis thaliana (Ath) Fpg DNA glycosylase were expressed, purified and characterized. In oligodeoxynucleotides, the preferred glycosylase substrates for both enzymes were Gh and Sp, the oxidation products of 8-oxoG, with the best substrate being a site of base loss. GC/MS analysis of bases released from γ-irradiated DNA show FapyAde and FapyGua to be excellent substrates as well. Studies carried out with oligodeoxynucleotide substrates demonstrate that both enzymes discriminated against A opposite the base lesion, characteristic of Fpg glycosylases. Single turnover kinetics with oligodeoxynucleotides showed that the plant and fungal glycosylases were most active on Gh and Sp, less active on oxidized pyrimidines and exhibited very little or no activity on 8-oxoG. Surprisingly, the activity of AthFpg1 on an AP site opposite a G was extremely robust with a k_obs of over 2500 min^?1.     

Mechanism of interaction between human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase and AP endonuclease

Human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (OGG1) is the main human base excision protein that removes a mutagenic lesion 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) from DNA. Since OGG1 has DNA glycosylase and weak abasic site (AP) lyase activities and is characterized by slow product release, turnover of the enzyme acting alone is low. Recently it was shown that human AP endonuclease (APE1) enhances the activity of OGG1. This enhancement was proposed to be passive, resulting from APE1 binding to or cleavage of AP sites after OGG1 dissociation. Here we present evidence that APE1 could actively displace OGG1 from its product, directly increasing the turnover of OGG1. We have observed that APE1 forms an electrophoretically detectable complex with OGG1 cross-linked to DNA by sodium borohydride. Using oligonucleotide substrates with a single 8-oxoG residue located in their 5'-terminal, central or 3'-terminal part, we have demonstrated that OGG1 activity does not increase only for the first of these three substrates, indicating that APE1 interacts with the DNA stretch 5' to the bound OGG1 molecule. In kinetic experiments, APE1 enhanced the product release constant but not the rate constant of base excision by OGG1. Moreover, OGG1 bound to a tetrahydrofuran analog of an abasic site stimulated the activity of APE1 on this substrate. Using a concatemeric DNA substrate, we have shown that APE1 likely displaces OGG1 in a processive mode, with OGG1 remaining on DNA but sliding away in search for a new lesion. Altogether, our data support a model in which APE1 specifically recognizes an OGG1/DNA complex, distorts a stretch of DNA 5' to the OGG1 molecule, and actively displaces the glycosylase from the lesion.     

Repair of oxidative DNA damage

Cellular genomes suffer extensive damage from exogenous agents and reactive oxygen species formed during normal metabolism. The MutT homologs (MutT/MTH) remove oxidized nucleotide precursors so that they cannot be incorporated into DNA during replication. Among many repair pathways, the base excision repair (BER) pathway is the most important cellular protection mechanism responding to oxidative DNA damage. The 8-oxoG glycosylases (Fpg or MutM/OGG) and the MutY homologs (MutY/MYH) glycosylases along with MutT/MTH protect cells from the mutagenic effects of 8-oxoG, the most stable and deleterious product known caused by oxidative damage to DNA. The key enzymes in the BER process are DNA glycosylases, which remove different damaged bases by cleavage of the N-glycosylic bonds between the bases and the deoxyribose moieties of the nucleotide residues. Biochemical and structural studies have demonstrated the substrate recognition and reaction mechanism of BER enzymes. Cocrystal structures of strated the substrate recognition and reaction mechanism of BER enzymes. Cocrystal structures of several glycosylases show that the substrate base flips out of the sharply bent DNA helix and the minor groove is widened to be accessed by the glycosylases. To complete the repair after glycosylase action, the apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site is further processed by an incision step, DNA synthesis, an excision step, and DNA ligation through two alternative pathways. The short-patch BER (1-nucleotide patch size) and long-patch BER (2–6-nucleotide patch size) pathways need AP endonuclease to generate a 3′ hydroxyl group but require different sets of enzymes for DNA synthesis and ligation. Protein-protein interactions have been reported among the enzymes involved in BER. It is possible that the successive players in the repair pathway are assembled in a complex to perform concerted actions. The BER pathways are proposed to protect cells and organisms from mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.     

Escherichia coli MutY and Fpg utilize a processive mechanism for target location

MutY and formamidopyrimidine-DNA-glycosylase (Fpg) are base-excision repair (BER) enzymes involved in the 8-oxoguanine repair pathway in Escherichia coli. An impressive feature of these enzymes is the ability to locate 8-oxoguanine lesions among a large excess of undamaged DNA. To provide insight into the mechanism of target location, the ability of these enzyme to utilize a one-dimensional processive search (DNA sliding) or distributive (random diffusion-mediated) mechanism was investigated. Each enzyme was incubated with double-stranded concatemeric polynucleotides containing a site-specific target site at 25-nucleotide (nt) intervals. The products of each reaction were analyzed after further treatment and denaturation. A rapid accumulation of predominantly 25-nt fragments would indicate the utilization of a processive mechanism, whereas oligomeric multiples of 25-nt fragments would form if a distributive mechanism were used. Both Fpg and MutY were found to function processively on concatemers containing 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (OG).C and G.A mispairs, respectively. An increase in sodium chloride concentration results in the modulation from a processive to distributive mechanism for both enzymes. Interestingly, processive behavior was not observed in the reaction of MutY with concatemers containing OG.A mispairs. A truncated form of MutY (Stop 225) containing only the N-terminal domain was found to behave in a manner consistent with a processive mechanism with both OG.A- and G.A-containing substrates. This suggests that the C-terminal domain of MutY plays an important role in the mechanism by which the enzyme detects OG.A base pairs in DNA.     

Structural and biochemical studies of a plant formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase reveal why eukaryotic Fpg glycosylases do not excise 8-oxoguanine

Formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg; MutM) is a DNA repair enzyme widely distributed in bacteria. Fpg recognizes and excises oxidatively modified purines, 4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidine, 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine and 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), with similar excision kinetics. It exhibits some lesser activity toward 8-oxoadenine. Fpg enzymes are also present in some plant and fungal species. The eukaryotic Fpg homologs exhibit little or no activity on DNA containing 8-oxoG, but they recognize and process its oxidation products, guanidinohydantoin (Gh) and spiroiminohydantoin (Sp). To date, several structures of bacterial Fpg enzymes unliganded or in complex with DNA containing a damaged base have been published but there is no structure of a eukaryotic Fpg. Here we describe the first crystal structure of a plant Fpg, Arabidopsis thaliana (AthFpg), unliganded and bound to DNA containing an abasic site analog, tetrahydrofuran (THF). Although AthFpg shares a common architecture with other Fpg glycosylases, it harbors a zincless finger, previously described in a subset of Nei enzymes, such as human NEIL1 and Mimivirus Nei1. Importantly the "αF-β9/10 loop" capping 8-oxoG in the active site of bacterial Fpg is very short in AthFpg. Deletion of a segment encompassing residues 213-229 in Escherichia coli Fpg (EcoFpg) and corresponding to the "αF-β9/10 loop" does not affect the recognition and removal of oxidatively damaged DNA base lesions, with the exception of 8-oxoG. Although the exact role of the loop remains to be further explored, it is now clear that this protein segment is specific to the processing of 8-oxoG.     

A Novel Role for Escherichia coli Endonuclease VIII in Prevention of Spontaneous G→T Transversions

In the bacterium Escherichia coli, oxidized pyrimidines are removed by two DNA glycosylases, endonuclease III and endonuclease VIII (endo VIII), encoded by the nth and nei genes, respectively. Double mutants lacking both of these activities exhibit a high spontaneous mutation frequency, and here we show that all of the mutations observed in the double mutants were G:C-->A:T transitions; no thymine mutations were found. These findings are in agreement with the preponderance of C-->T transitions in the oxidative and spontaneous mutational databases. The major oxidized purine lesion in DNA, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG), is processed by two DNA glycosylases, formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg), which removes 8-oxoG opposite C, and MutY DNA glycosylase, which removes misincorporated A opposite 8-oxoG. The high spontaneous mutation frequency previously observed in fpg mutY double mutants was significantly enhanced by the addition of the nei mutation, suggesting an overlap in the substrate specificities between endo VIII and Fpg/MutY. When the mutational specificity was examined, all of the mutations observed were G:C-->T:A transversions, indicating that in the absence of Fpg and MutY, endo VIII serves as a backup activity to remove 8-oxoG. This was confirmed by showing that, indeed, endo VIII can recognize 8-oxoG in vitro.     

An OGG1 orthologue encoding a functional 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase/lyase in Arabidopsis thaliana

Repair of the ubiquitous mutagenic lesion 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is initiated in eukaryotes by DNA glycosylases/lyases, such as yeast Ogg1, that do not share significant sequence identity with their prokaryotic counterparts, typified by Escherichia coli MutM (Fpg) protein. The unexpected presence of a functional mutM orthologue in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana has brought into question the existence of functional OGG1 orthologues in plants. We report here the cDNA cloning, expression and functional characterization of AtOGG1, an Arabidopsis thaliana gene widely expressed in different plant tissues which encodes a 40.3 kDa protein with significant sequence identity to yeast and human Ogg1 proteins. Purified AtOgg1 enzyme specifically cleaves duplex DNA containing an 8-OxoG:C mispair, and the repair reaction proceeds through an imine intermediate characteristic of all bifunctional DNA glycosylases/lyases. Consistent with its in vitro activity, expression of AtOGG1 suppresses the mutator phenotype of an E. coli strain deficient in 8-oxoG repair. Our results suggest that AtOgg1 is an structural and functional homologue of Ogg1 and establish the presence of two distinct 8-oxoG repair enzymes in Arabidopsis.     

Distinct repair activities of human 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase for formamidopyrimidine and 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine

7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) and 2,6-diamino-4-hydroxyformamidopyrimidine (Fapy) are major DNA lesions formed by reactive oxygen species and are involved in mutagenic and/or lethal events in cells. Both lesions are repaired by human 7, 8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg) in human and Escherichia coli cells, respectively. In the present study, the repair activities of hOGG1 and Fpg were compared using defined oligonucleotides containing 8-oxoG and a methylated analog of Fapy (me-Fapy) at the same site. The k(cat)/K(m) values of hOGG1 for 8-oxoG and me-Fapy were comparable, and this was also the case for Fpg. However, the k(cat)/K(m) values of hOGG1 for both lesions were approximately 80-fold lower than those of Fpg. Analysis of the Schiff base intermediate by NaBH(4) trapping implied that lower substrate affinity and slower hydrolysis of the intermediate for hOGG1 than Fpg accounted for the difference. hOGG1 and Fpg showed distinct preferences of the base opposite 8-oxoG, with the activity differences being 19.8- (hOGG1) and 12-fold (Fpg) between the most and least preferred bases. Surprisingly, such preferences were almost abolished and less than 2-fold for both enzymes when me-Fapy was a substrate, suggesting that, unlike 8-oxoG, me-Fapy is not subjected to paired base-dependent repair. The repair efficiency of me-Fapy randomly incorporated in M13 DNA varied at the sequence level, but orders of preferred and unpreferred repair sites were quite different for hOGG1 and Fpg. The distinctive activities of hOGG1 and Fpg including enzymatic parameters (k(cat)/K(m)), paired base, and sequence context effects may originate from the differences in the inherent architecture of the DNA binding domain and catalytic mechanism of the enzymes.     

Stimulation of DNA glycosylase activity of OGG1 by NEIL1: functional collaboration between two human DNA glycosylases

The eukaryotic 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1) provides the major activity for repairing mutagenic 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) induced in the genome due to oxidative stress. Earlier in vitro studies showed that, after excising the base lesion, the human OGG1 remains bound to the resulting abasic (AP) site in DNA and does not turn over efficiently. The human AP-endonuclease (APE1), which cleaves the phosphodiester bond 5' to the AP site, in the next step of repair, displaces the bound OGG1 and thus increases its turnover. Here we show that NEIL1, a DNA glycosylase/AP lyase specific for many oxidized bases but with weak 8-oxoG excision activity, stimulates turnover of OGG1 in a fashion similar to that of APE1 and carries out betadelta-elimination at the AP site. This novel collaboration of two DNA glycosylases, which do not stably interact with each other, in stimulating 8-oxoguanine repair is possible because of higher AP site affinity and stronger AP lyase activity of NEIL1 relative to OGG1. Comparable levels of NEIL1 and OGG1 in some human cells raise the possibility that NEIL1 serves as a backup enzyme to APE1 in stimulating 8-oxoG repair in vivo.     

Two sequential phosphates 3' adjacent to the 8-oxoguanosine are crucial for lesion excision by E. coli Fpg protein and human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase

Escherichia coli formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) and human 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) are base excision repair enzymes involved in the 8-oxoguanine (oxoG) repair pathway. Specific contacts between these enzymes and DNA phosphate groups play a significant role in DNA-protein interactions. To reveal the phosphates crucial for lesion excision by Fpg and hOGG1, modified DNA duplexes containing pyrophosphate and OEt-substituted pyrophosphate internucleotide (SPI) groups near the oxoG were tested as substrate analogues for both proteins. We have shown that Fpg and hOGG1 recognize and specifically bind the DNA duplexes tested. We have found that both enzymes were not able to excise the oxoG residue from DNA containing modified phosphates immediately 3' to the 8-oxoguanosine (oxodG) and one nucleotide 3' away from it. In contrast, they efficiently incised DNA duplexes bearing the same phosphate modifications 5' to the oxodG and two nucleotides 3' away from the lesion. The effect of these phosphate modifications on the substrate properties of oxoG-containing DNA duplexes is discussed. Non-cleavable oxoG-containing DNA duplexes bearing pyrophosphate or SPI groups immediately 3' to the oxodG or one nucleotide 3' away from it are specific inhibitors for both 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylases and can be used for structural studies of complexes comprising a wild-type enzymes bound to oxoG-containing DNA.     

The high binding affinity of human ribosomal protein S3 to 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine is abrogated by a single amino acid change

Previous studies have shown that human ribosomal protein S3 (hS3) has a high apparent binding affinity for 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) residues in DNA and interacts with the human base excision repair (BER) proteins OGG1 and APE/Ref-1. We used a combination of computational and experimental approaches to understand the role of hS3 in BER and its potential to hinder repair of 8-oxoG lesions by OGG1 and APE/Ref-1. Sequence analysis was employed to identify hS3 residues likely to be involved in binding to 8-oxoG. One putative site, lysine 132 (K132), located in a helix-hairpin-helix DNA binding motif, was mutated to alanine (K132A). The hS3-K132A mutant retained the ability to cleave abasic DNA, but its capacity to bind 8-oxoG was abrogated completely. The ability of OGG1 to cleave an 8-oxoG-oligonucleotide substrate pre-incubated with hS3 or hS3-K132A was also tested. Pre-incubations with wild-type hS3 and 8-oxoG-containing oligonucleotides completely prevented the subsequent removal of 8-oxoG by OGG1. On the other hand, OGG1 incubations combined with hS3-K132A stimulated cleavage of 8-oxoG in excess of two-fold, confirming previous observations that hS3 positively interacts with OGG1, but only under conditions in which the binding of hS3 to 8-oxoG is limited. Overall, the ability of OGG1 to repair 8-oxoG is compromised when hS3 is bound to 8-oxoG sites. Conversely, in the absence of DNA binding, hS3 interacts positively with OGG1 to produce a more robust removal of 8-oxoG residues in DNA.     

The C-terminal Lysine of Ogg2 DNA Glycosylases is a Major Molecular Determinant for Guanine/8-Oxoguanine Distinction

7,8-Dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is a major oxidative lesion found in DNA. The 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylases (Ogg) responsible for the removal of 8-oxoG are divided into three families Ogg1, Ogg2 and AGOG. The Ogg2 members are devoid of the recognition loop used by Ogg1 to discriminate between 8-oxoG and guanine and it was unclear until recently how Ogg2 enzymes recognize the oxidized base. We present here the first crystallographic structure of an Ogg2 member, Methanocaldococcus janischii Ogg, in complex with a DNA duplex containing the 8-oxoG lesion. This structure highlights the crucial role of the C-terminal lysine, strictly conserved in Ogg2, in the recognition of 8-oxoG. The structure also reveals that Ogg2 undergoes a conformational change upon DNA binding similar to that observed in Ogg1 glycosylases. Furthermore, this work provides a structural rationale for the lack of opposite base specificity in this family of enzymes.     

Structural Characterization of Clostridium acetobutylicum 8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase in Its Apo Form and in Complex with 8-Oxodeoxyguanosine

DNA is subject to a multitude of oxidative damages generated by oxidizing agents from metabolism and exogenous sources and by ionizing radiation. Guanine is particularly vulnerable to oxidation, and the most common oxidative product 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is the most prevalent lesion observed in DNA molecules. 8-OxoG can form a normal Watson-Crick pair with cytosine (8-oxoG:C), but it can also form a stable Hoogsteen pair with adenine (8-oxoG:A), leading to a G:C → T:A transversion after replication. Fortunately, 8-oxoG is recognized and excised by either of two DNA glycosylases of the base excision repair pathway: formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase and 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (Ogg). While Clostridium acetobutylicum Ogg (CacOgg) DNA glycosylase can specifically recognize and remove 8-oxoG, it displays little preference for the base opposite the lesion, which is unusual for a member of the Ogg1 family. This work describes the crystal structures of CacOgg in its apo form and in complex with 8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine. A structural comparison between the apo form and the liganded form of the enzyme reveals a structural reorganization of the C-terminal domain upon binding of 8-oxoG, similar to that reported for human OGG1. A structural comparison of CacOgg with human OGG1, in complex with 8-oxoG containing DNA, provides a structural rationale for the lack of opposite base specificity displayed by CacOgg.     

Interaction of pro-and eukaryotic DNA repair enzymes with oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing clustered lesions

A study was made of the interaction of 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylases of Escherichia coli (Fpg) and human (OGG1), as well as apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases of yeast (Apn1) and E. coli (Nfo), with oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing 8-oxoguaine (oxoG) and tetrahydrofuran (F, a stable analog of an apurinic site) separated by various numbers of nucleotides. Inhibitor analysis showed that the affinity of Fgp for single-stranded DNA ligands is virtually independent of the relative positions of oxoG and F. K _M and k _cat were determined for all the four enzymes and all double-stranded substrates studied. The effect of the second lesion strongly depended both on the relative position of the lesion and the enzyme of interest. The highest drop in the affinity of Fpg and OGG1 for the substrate (1.6-to 148-fold) and in the reaction rate (4.8-to 58-fold) was recorded for the oligonucleotides in which F was immediately 3′ or 5′ of oxoG. Introduction of the second lesion barely affected K _M for nucleases Apn1 and Nfo. The reaction rate was five-to tenfold lower for the substrates containing two adjacent lesions. For all enzymes studied, an increase in the distance between two lesions in double-stranded DNA decreased their contribution to K _M and k _cat.     

Clostridium acetobutylicum 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (Ogg) differs from eukaryotic Oggs with respect to opposite base discrimination

During repair of damaged DNA, the oxidized base 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) is removed by 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase (Ogg) in eukaryotes and most archaea, whereas in most bacteria it is removed by formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg). We report the first characterization of a bacterial Ogg, Clostridium acetobutylicum Ogg (CacOgg). Like human OGG1 and Escherichia coli Fpg (EcoFpg), CacOgg excised 8-oxoguanine. However, unlike hOGG1 and EcoFpg, CacOgg showed little preference for the base opposite the damage during base excision and removed 8-oxoguanine from single-stranded DNA. Thus, our results showed unambiguous qualitative functional differences in vitro between CacOgg and both hOGG1 and EcoFpg. CacOgg differs in sequence from the eukaryotic enzymes at two sequence positions, M132 and F179, which align with amino acids (R154 and Y203) in human OGG1 (hOGG1) found to be involved in opposite base interaction. To address the sequence basis for functional differences with respect to opposite base interactions, we prepared three CacOgg variants, M132R, F179Y, and M132R/F179Y. All three variants showed a substantial increase in specificity for 8-oxoG.C relative to 8-oxoG.A. While we were unable to definitively associate these qualitative functional differences with differences in selective pressure between eukaryotes, Clostridia, and other bacteria, our results are consistent with the idea that evolution of Ogg function is based on kinetic control of repair.