RU486, a progestin antagonist, binds to progesterone receptors in a human endometrial cancer cell line and reverses the growth inhibition by progestins

The human endometrial cancer cell line, IK-90 cells, contains estrogen-independent progesterone receptors (PR) and is progestin sensitive. Accumulation of glycogen in the cytoplasm of IK-90 cells as well as growth inhibition of the cells in response to progestins are observed. In the present study, the effects of RU486, a progestin antagonist, on IK-90 cells were investigated in a serum-supplemented medium. Scatchard plot analysis of cytoplasmic binding data in the cells revealed a high affinity binding site for RU486 (Kd, 2.6 nM) with maximum binding sites of 169 fmol/mg protein. However, the binding ability to DNA-cellulose of heat activated [3H]RU486-PR complexes was lower when compared with that of the progestin agonist [3H]R5020-PR complexes, suggesting a decrease in progestin activity of RU486 in IK-90 cells. The addition of 1 microM RU486 to culture medium produced periodic acid-Schiff-positive granules in the cytoplasm of the cells. On the other hand, RU486 (1 nM-1 microM) did not significantly inhibit the growth of cells. However, RU486 (0.1-1 microM) totally prevented the growth-inhibitory effect of R5020 (0.1-1 microM) on IK-90 cells. In conclusion, RU486, an antiprogestin, had a dual activity both a progestin antagonist and weak agonist in human endometrial cancer cells, which was not mediated through the estrogen receptor system.     

Effects of antiestrogen versus antiprogestin on transformed and nontransformed steroid receptors

In order to determine if different physicochemical properties exist among antihormone-receptor complexes, we have compared the interaction of the antiprogestin RU486 with progesterone receptor (PR) versus the triphenylethylene antiestrogen H1285 (4-(N,N-diethyl-aminoethoxy)-4'-methoxy-alpha-(p-hydroxyphenyl-alp ha'- ethylstilbene] with estrogen receptor (ER) from rabbit uterine tissue. Contrary to other reports, we observed no difference in the sedimentation properties of transformed PR (4S) when bound by the antagonist RU486 versus the progesterone agonist R5020 in either cytosol or DEAE partially-purified receptor preparations analyzed on sucrose gradients containing 0.3 M KCl. In addition, we found no difference in the sedimentation properties of these receptor preparations in the presence of 10 mM sodium molybdate: the nontransformed RU486-PR and nontransformed R5020-PR both sedimented as a 6S species. These same results were obtained when the receptor preparation and gradient analysis were performed in the absence of monothioglycerol. Likewise, there was no change in the sedimentation properties of the transformed PR when the receptor, partially purified in the absence of molybdate, was analyzed on sucrose gradients containing 10 mM sodium molybdate to prevent receptor alteration during centrifugation. From DNA-cellulose assays performed with partially purified PR in the absence of molybdate we determined that the 4S form of R5020-PR and RU486-PR is transformed receptor; whereas in the presence of molybdate, the 6S species is nontransformed. In contrast, we found a different pattern of sedimentation when comparing transformed antiestrogen-receptor complexes with transformed estrogen-receptor complexes. In this case, transformed H1285-ER sedimented as 6S and estradiol-ER sedimented as 4S. We conclude from these experiments that these two antihormones, RU486 and H1285, may have different mechanisms of action in their antagonism of steroid hormone action. Antiestrogen stabilizes the salt-transformed ER as a dimer while antiprogestin appears to permit dissociation of the oligomeric form of the receptor to the monomeric form.     

Novel antiprogestins Org 31806 and 31710: interaction with mammalian progesterone receptor and DNA binding of antisteroid receptor complexes.

We have examined steroid binding parameters and transformation of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR) liganded with progestins (progesterone and R5020) and the newly synthesized antiprogestins (Org 31806 and 31710). Species specificity analysis indicated that [3H]R5020 binding in the chicken oviduct cytosol could be eliminated in the presence of 100-fold excess radioinert progesterone and R5020 but not Org 31806 and 31710. In the calf uterine cytosol, the progestins and the antiprogestins appeared to interact with the same PR as revealed by the displacement of [3H]R5020 by all of the above steroids. When the extent of [3H]R5020 binding was examined in the presence of different concentrations of radioinert steroids, the relative affinity with which these compounds interacted with the uterine PR was found to be comparable. A 23 degrees C incubation of cytosol transformed the progestin-bound PR complexes increasing their binding to DNA-cellulose from 5 (0 degrees C, nontransformed) to 35%. Under these conditions, 20% Org 31710- and RU486-occupied PR complexes bound to DNA-cellulose whereas only 10% Org 31806-receptor complexes were retained by the resin. Transformation (23 degrees C) of cytosol receptor caused a loss of the larger 8 S form and an increase in the smaller 4 S form. In its unliganded state or when it was complexed with R5020 or the antiprogestins, incubation of PR at 23 degrees C led to dissociation of the receptor-associated 90 kDa heat-shock protein (hsp90). The PR-hsp90 association was stabilized in the presence of 10 mM iodoacetamide when the ligand binding site was occupied by Org 31806 and 31710. The R5020-receptor complexes, however, allowed release of hsp90 under the above transforming conditions. Our results indicate that although Org 31806 and 31710 show no affinity for the avian PR, these steroids interact with the mammalian PR. We propose that the reported antiprogestational effects of Org 31806 and 31710 are mediated via their interaction with PR which appears similar to one that exists between PR and RU486.     

Mammalian progesterone receptor shows differential sensitivity to sulfhydryl group modifying agents when bound to agonist and antagonist ligands

Modulation of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR), in relation to its binding to synthetic steroids with known agonist (R5020) and antagonist (RU486) properties, was studied in the presence of iodoacetamide (IA), N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), beta-mercaptoethanol (MER), and dithiothreitol (DTT). Pretreatment of uterine cytosol at 4 degrees C with NEM (4-10 mM) reduced the binding of [3H]RU486 to PR by 40%, but [3H] R5020 binding was completely abolished. Whereas IA (2-10 mM) treatment did not affect [3H]RU486 binding, [3H]R5020 binding was totally eliminated. DTT or MER increased the binding of both steroids slightly (15%). [3H]R5020- or [3H]RU486-receptor complexes (Rc) migrated in the 8 S region and were eliminated upon pretreatment with NEM. At 23 degrees C, DTT increased the amount of 4 S [3H]R5020-Rc, but had no effect on the [3H]RU486-Rc. In the control, [3H]RU486 binding to the 8 S PR could be competed with radioinert R5020 or RU486, but R5020 failed to compete in the presence of IA. The heat-treated [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-Rc showed reduced binding to DNA-cellulose in the presence of NEM and IA. The results of our study suggest that SH group modifications differentially influence the properties of mammalian PR complexed with either R5020 or RU486. In the presence of IA, the [3H]RU486-Rc remained in the 8 S form when incubated at 23 degrees C, indicating that RU486 binding causes conformational changes in PR which are distinct from those that result upon R5020 binding.     

Effects of the steroid antagonist RU486 on dimerization of the human progesterone receptor.

We previously reported, using a coimmunoprecipitation assay, that the B form (PR-B) of the human progesterone receptor from T47D human breast cancer cells dimerizes in solution with the A receptor (PR-A) and that the extent of dimerization correlates with receptor binding activity for specific DNA sequences [DeMarzo, A.M., Beck, C.A., O?ate, S.A., & Edwards, D.P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 72-76]. This suggested that solution dimerization is an intermediate step in the receptor activation process. The present study has tested the effects of the progesterone antagonist RU486 on solution dimerization of progesterone receptors (PR). As determined by the coimmunoprecipitation assay, RU486 binding did not impair dimerization of receptors; rather, the antagonist promoted more efficient solution dimerization than the progestin agonist R5020. This enhanced receptor dimerization correlated with a higher DNA binding activity for transformed receptors bound with RU486. RU486 has been shown previously to produce two other alterations in the human PR when compared with R5020. PR-RU486 complexes in solution exhibit a faster sedimentation rate (6 S) on salt-containing sucrose density gradients than PR-R5020 complexes (4 S), and PR-DNA complexes have a faster electrophoretic mobility on gel-shift assays in the presence of RU486. We presently show that the 6 S PR-RU486 complex is a receptor monomer, not a dimer. The increased sedimentation rate and increased mobility on gel-shift assays promoted by RU486 were also observed with recombinant PR-A and PR-B separately expressed in insect cells from baculovirus vectors. These results suggest that RU486 induces a distinct conformational change both in PR monomers in solution and in dimers bound to DNA. We also examined whether conformational changes in PR induced by RU486 would prevent a PR polypeptide bound to RU486 from heterodimerization with another PR polypeptide bound to R5020. To evaluate this, PR-A and PR-B that were separately bound to R5020 or RU486 in whole cells were mixed in vitro. PR-A-RU486 was capable of dimerization with PR-B-R5020, and this was demonstrated for heterodimers both formed in solution and bound to specific DNA. The capability to form heterodimers in vitro raises the possibility that the antagonist action of RU486 in vivo could in part be imposed in a dominant negative fashion through heterodimerization between one receptor subunit bound to an agonist and another bound to RU486.     

Transformation of calf uterine progesterone receptor: analysis of the process when receptor is bound to progesterone and RU38486

Effects of different transforming agents were examined on the sedimentation characteristics of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR) bound to the synthetic progestin [3H]R5020 or the known progesterone antagonist [3H]RU38486 (RU486). [3H]R5020-receptor complexes [progesterone-receptor complexes (PRc)] sedimented as fast migrating 8S moieties in 8-30% linear glycerol gradients containing 0.15 M KCl and 20 mM Na2MoO4. Incubation of cytosol containing [3H]PRc at 23 degrees C for 10-60 min, or at 0 degrees C with 0.15-0.3 M KCl or 1-10 mM ATP, caused a gradual transformation of PRc to a slow sedimenting 4S form. This 8S to 4S transformation was molybdate sensitive. In contrast, the [3H]RU486-receptor complex exhibited only the 8S form. Treatment with all three activation agents caused a decrease in the 8S form but no concomitant transformation of the [3H]RU486-receptor complex into the 4S form. PR in the calf uterine cytosol incubated at 23 or at 0 degrees C with 0.3 M KCl or 10 mM ATP could be subsequently complexed with [3H]R5020 to yield the 4S form of PR. However, the cytosol PR transformed in the absence of any added ligand failed to bind [3H]RU486. Heat treatment of both [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes caused an increase in DNA-cellulose binding, although the extent of this binding was lower when RU486 was bound to receptors. An aqueous two-phase partitioning analysis revealed a significant change in the surface properties of PR following both binding to ligand and subsequent transformation. The partition coefficient (Kobsd) of the heat-transformed [3H]R5020-receptor complex increased about 5-fold over that observed with PR at 0 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mechanism of action of an antiprogesterone, RU486, in the rabbit endometrium. Effects of RU486 on the progesterone receptor and on the expression of the uteroglobin gene

RU486 is a recently described antiprogesterone. In order to be able to understand its mechanism of action it is necessary to analyze its effect on a discrete gene product. We show here that the induction of uteroglobin mRNA by progesterone in the rabbit endometrium may be a suitable model for such studies since RU486 totally inhibits this effect without itself exerting any agonistic activity. Moreover, RU486, which does not bind to the estrogen receptor and is devoid of general antiestrogenic activity, partially inhibits the induction by estradiol of uteroglobin mRNA. Studies of the interaction between [3H]RU486 and the progesterone receptor have been undertaken with the aim of understanding the antagonistic effect of this compound. The binding to DNA-cellulose of heat-activated [3H]RU486-receptor complexes was slightly decreased (37%) when compared with that of the agonist [3H]R5020-receptor complexes (47%). Detailed analysis of this difference showed that it was due to both a decreased activation of complexes and to a diminished affinity of activated complexes towards DNA. The change in activation was shown by the fact that at high concentrations of DNA, where all activated complexes are bound, agonist-receptor complexes were bound to DNA in higher proportion than antagonist-receptor complexes. Moreover a difference was also observed when studying the binding of agonist-receptor and antagonist-receptor complexes to charged resins (phosphocellulose, DEAE-cellulose) which are known to discriminate between activated and non-activated complexes. Decreased affinity to DNA of antagonist-receptor complexes was shown by studying their binding at various concentrations of DNA, either in crude cytosol or after isolating a homogenous population of activated-receptor complexes by DNA-cellulose chromatography and by comparing the salt extraction from DNA-cellulose of agonist-receptor and antagonist-receptor complexes. Both effects (decreased activation and diminished affinity towards DNA) were relatively moderate and could account only for a small decrease in the agonistic activity of RU486. Thus, the fact that this compound is a complete antagonist without any agonistic activity can only be explained by a defect in some further step of hormone action as, for instance in the specific interaction with the regulatory regions of the uteroglobin gene. No immunological difference could be detected between [3H]R5020-receptor and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes, both interacted with the five monoclonal antibodies raised against purified R5020-receptor complexes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Characterization of R5020 and RU486 binding to progesterone receptor from calf uterus

We have examined and compared the binding characteristics of the progesterone agonist R5020 [promegestone, 17,21-dimethylpregna-4,9(10)-diene-3,20-dione] and the progesterone antagonist RU486 [mifepristone, 17 beta-hydroxy-11 beta-[4-(dimethylamino) phenyl]-17 alpha-(prop-1-ynyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one] in calf uterine cytosol. Both steroids bound cytosol macromolecule(s) with high affinity, exhibiting Kd values of 5.6 and 3.6 nM for R5020 and RU486 binding, respectively. The binding of the steroids to the macromolecule(s) was rapid at 4 degrees C, showing saturation of binding sites at 1-2 h for [3H]progesterone and 2-4 h for both [3H]R5020 and [3H]RU486. Addition of molybdate and glycerol to cytosol increased the extent of [3H]R5020 binding. The extent of [3H]RU486 binding remained unchanged in the presence of molybdate, whereas glycerol had an inhibitory effect. Molybdate alone or in combination with glycerol stabilized the [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes at 37 degrees C. Although the rate of association of [3H]RU486 with the cytosolic macromolecule was slower than that of [3H]R5020, its dissociation from the ligand-macromolecule complex was significantly slower than [3H]R5020. Competitive steroid binding analysis revealed that [3H]progesterone, [3H]R5020, and [3H]RU486 compete for the same site(s) in the uterine cytosol, suggesting that all three bind to the progesterone receptor (PR). Sedimentation rate analysis showed that both steroids were bound to a molecule that sediments in the 8S region. The 8S [3H]R5020 and [3H]RU486 peaks were abolished by excess radioinert progesterone, RU486, or R5020.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Steroid receptor exchange assay in the presence of acetonitrile: application to the study of glucocorticoid- and anti-glucocorticoid-receptor complexes.

Acetonitrile was used to modify the binding parameters of glucocorticoid-receptor complexes. Acetonitrile (8%) caused a striking increase of the rate constant of dissociation of non-transformed [3H]triamcinolone and [3H]RU 486 receptor complexes. The latter complexes appeared significantly less sensitive to acetonitrile than the former. Similar data were obtained for heat-transformed [3H]triamcinolone and RU 486-receptor complexes purified at a 90% relative homogeneity by DEAE-Trisacryl (diethylaminoethyl) chromatography. The rate constant of dissociation of both steroid-receptor complexes decreased after transformation. The dissociation of non-transformed receptor complexes by acetonitrile was reversible, and an exchange assay allowing 75% to 85% steroid exchange is described. However, the dissociation of transformed receptor complexes appeared completely irreversible and precluded the design of any exchange assay.     

Antiprogestin-receptor complexes: differences in the interaction of the antiprogestin RU38,486 and the progestin R5020 with the progesterone receptor of human breast cancer cells

In order to understand the molecular basis for antiprogestin action, we have compared the interaction of the antiprogestin [3H]RU38, 486 (RU486) and the progestin [3H]R5020 with the progesterone receptor (PR). In both MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells, we have observed marked differences in the sedimentation properties of the PR on high salt sucrose gradients: while the R5020-receptor complexes sediment at approximately 4 S (4.4 +/- 0.1 S), the RU486-receptor sediments as a prominent 6 S species as well as a 4 S species. This binding is abolished by excess unlabelled R5020, RU486 or progesterone, but is unaffected by excess unlabelled hydrocortisone or dexamethasone, indicating that both the 4 S and 6 S species represent the PR and not glucocorticoid receptor. Although the relative distribution of 4 S and 6 S forms is not altered by treatment with DNAse or RNAse, exposure to 10 mM thioglycerol or to 3 M urea results in conversion of the 6 S to the 4 S form, suggesting that disulfide bonds and hydrophobic interactions are important in maintaining the integrity of the 6 S form. These findings suggest that the 6 S antiprogestin complex is formed as a result of the interaction of PR units with each other or with a different protein. This change in receptor association state may be an important aspect of the antiprogestin activity of RU486.     

The nonactivated progesterone receptor is a nuclear heterooligomer

The discovery of the nuclear localization of estradiol and progesterone receptors in the absence of the steroid hormone has led to reconsideration of the model of cytoplasmic to nuclear translocation of these receptors upon exposure to hormone. Unoccupied nonactivated receptors are thought to be weakly bound to nuclei of target cells from which they are leaking during tissue fractionation and thus found in the cytosol fraction of homogenates in a nontransformed heterooligomeric "8-9 S" form, which includes hsp90. However, no direct biochemical evidence has yet been obtained for the presence of such heterooligomers in the target cell nucleus, possibly because it dissociates in high ionic strength medium used for extraction of the nuclear receptor. We took advantage of the combined stabilizing effects of tungstate ions and antiprogestin RU486 to extract a nuclear non-DNA binding nontransformed 8.5 S-RU486-progesterone receptor complex from estradiol-treated immature rabbit uterine explants incubated with the antagonist. As demonstrated by immunological criteria and by irreversible cross-linking with dimethylpimelimidate, the complex contained, in addition to the hormone binding unit, hsp90, and p59, another nonhormone binding protein. Control experiments carried out with the progestin R5020 yielded the expected nuclear transformed DNA binding 4.5 S-R5020-progesterone receptor complex. These results offer evidence for two distinct forms of steroid receptor in target cell nuclei. Besides the classical "4 S" agonist-receptor complex, tightly bound to the DNA-chromatin structure and in all probability able to trigger the hormonal response, we have observed in the RU486-bound state a non-DNA binding nontransformed 8.5 S form, presumably already present in the nucleus in the absence of hormone and representing the native nonactive form of the receptor.     

Characterization of ligand binding,DNA binding and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor by two novel progesterone receptor antagonist ligands

In order to gain a better understanding of the distinctive mechanisms of the various types of antiprogestins, we have characterized in vitro ligand binding, specific DNA binding and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor (PR) from T47D cells after treatment of cells with progestins (progesterone, R5020) and antiprogestins (RU486, ZK98299, Org 31806 and Org 31710). Treatment of the cells with R5020 or PR antagonists, with the exception of ZK98299, resulted in a quantitative upshift of PR-A and PR-B indicative of ligand/DNA-induced phosphorylation of PR. Treatment of cells with RU486, Org 31710 or Org 31806, but not R5020 or ZK98299 resulted in detectable PR-progesterone response element complexes (PR-PREc) as assessed by gel mobility shift assay. Although treatment of cells with ZK98299, a type I PR antagonist, did not induce phosphorylation, the antiprogestins, Org 31806 and Org 31710, in a manner identical to RU486, did. Our data suggest that Org 31806 and Org 31710 affect propertie s of PR from T47D cells that are similar to RU486. (Mol Cell Biochem 175: 205–212, 1997)     

Mutations in the “zinc fingers” or in the n-terminal region of the DNA binding domain of the human glucocorticosteroid receptor facilitate its salt-induced transformation, but do not modify hormone binding

While the effects of the ligand (hormone)_binding domain (LBD) on other receptor domain functions are kwown, the effects of other domains on LBD functions have not been studied. In this work, we examined the importance of the strutural integrity of other domains of the human glucocorticosteroid receptor (hGR) on LBD activity (stability of 8S complexes, binding of hormone, and transformation from the 8S to the 4S form). Several mutations introduced outside the LBD affect neither the formation of stable 8S heterooligomeric complexes nor the hGR binding affinity for the agonist triacinolone acetonide (TA) or the 8S-hGR into a 4S form. Deletion of the second zinc finger of the DNA binding domain (DBD) facilitated 8S dissociation whether the ligand was TA or RU486. Deletion of the first zinc finger facilitated dissociation only in the presence of RU486. Deletion of the first zinc finger facilitated dissociation only in the presence of RU486. while replacement of PRO 416 (in the N-terminal region of the DBD) by ARG destabilized the 8S form only in the presence of TA. Variations in the salt-sensitivity of the mutated 8S GR complexes as a function of the ligand suggest that the DBD may interact functioanlly (if not physically) with the LBD. This interaction (possibly mediated by hsp90) could be influenced by minor structural differences between agonist and antagonist-GR complexes.     

Ligand-specific dynamics of the progesterone receptor in living cells and during chromatin remodeling in vitro

Progesterone receptor (PR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, is a key regulator of several processes in reproductive function. We have studied the dynamics of the interaction of PR with a natural target promoter in living cells through the use of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis and also have characterized the dynamics of the interaction of PR with the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter reconstituted into chromatin in vitro. In photobleaching experiments, PR in the presence of the agonist R5020 exhibits rapid exchange with the MMTV promoter in living cells. Two PR antagonists, RU486 and ZK98299, have opposite effects on receptor dynamics in vivo. In the presence of RU486, PR binds to the promoter and is exchanged more slowly than the agonist-activated receptor. In contrast, PR bound to ZK98299 is not localized to the promoter and exhibits higher mobility in the nucleoplasm than the agonist-bound receptor. Significantly, PR bound to R5020 or RU486 can recruit the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex to the promoter, but PR activated with ZK98299 cannot. Furthermore, we found ligand-specific active displacement of PR from the MMTV promoter during chromatin remodeling in vitro and conclude that the interaction of PR with chromatin is highly dynamic both in vivo and in vitro. We propose that factor displacement during chromatin remodeling is an important component of receptor mobility and that ligand-specific interactions with remodeling complexes can strongly influence receptor nuclear dynamics and rates of exchange with chromatin in living cells.     

ZK98299--a new antiprogesterone: biochemical characterization of steroid binding parameters in the calf uterine cytosol.

We have examined steroid binding characteristics of a newly synthesized antisteroid, ZK98299 [onapristone, 11 beta-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-17 alpha-hydroxy-17 beta-(3-hydroxypropyl)- 13 alpha-methyl-4,9-gonadien-3-one], in the calf uterus cytosol and compared the nature of this interaction with the binding of progesterone receptor (PR) agonist R5020 [promegestone, 17,21-dimethylpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione]. In the freshly prepared cytosol, [3H]ZK98299 interacted specifically with a macromolecule: the binding was abolished in the presence of excess progestins (R5020 and progesterone) and the antiprogesterone ZK98299. The high affinity (Kd = 2.5 nM) interaction between [3H]ZK98299 and PR was temperature- and time-dependent, reaching an optimum by 2-3 h at 0 degrees C, and was facilitated by 20 mM Na2MoO4. Under nontransforming conditions, [3H]ZK98299-receptor complexes sedimented as 8 S species in 8-30% linear glycerol gradients. Upon salt or thermal transformation, there was a loss of the 8 S form, with only a small fraction of total complexes (5-7%) binding to DNA-cellulose. In contrast, transformed [3H]R5020-receptor complexes exhibited a greater extent of binding (25-55%) to DNA-cellulose. [3H]ZK98299-receptor complexes could be resolved into two ionic species over DEAE-Sephacel following incubation of the complexes at 0 or 23 degrees C. [3H]ZK98299 binding was sensitive to sulfhydryl group modification as beta-mercaptoethanol increased the extent of steroid binding. Although treatment with iodoacetamide (IA) abolished [3H]R5020 binding, there was a significant (nearly twofold) increase in the [3H]ZK98299 binding. The results of this study point to similarities and differences between the steroid binding properties of the uterine PR occupied by R5020 and ZK98299: both steroids appear to bind the same 8 S receptor but exhibit differential DNA binding and sensitivity to IA. The reported antagonist properties of ZK98299 may, therefore, be explained on the basis of a distinct receptor conformation induced by the antisteroid.     

Agonist and antagonist-induced qualitative and quantitative alterations of progesterone receptor from breast cancer cells

T47D cells, cultured in medium containing serum stripped of endogenous steroids, proliferate in response to treatment with the progesterone receptor (PR) agonist, R5020 or the PR agonist/antagonist, RU486, whereas the full PR antagonist, ZK98299 has no proliferative effects. Under estrogenized conditions, all of the PR ligands tested inhibit cell growth [23]. In order to determine whether the levels or phosphorylation state of PR are reflected in the growth patterns of T47D cells, we monitored the effects of these PR ligands on the immunoblotted PR band intensities, the relative intensities, of PR-A and PR-B, and their phosphorylation states that are reflected in their altered mobility during SDS-PAGE. Under conditions where the PR ligands inhibit cell proliferation, each ligand had distinctively different qualitative and quantitative effects on PR. Short term treatment of the cells with R5020 or RU486 induced a characteristic phosphorylation-dependent upshift of both PR-A and PR-B. The phosphorylated PR was stable for up to 4 days after treatment of the cells with RU486, but was down regulated between 6-24 h after treatment with R5020. No replenishment of PR in cells treated with R5020 was detected. ZK98299, at concentrations tested, had no qualitative or quantitative effects on PR. Culturing cells for 8 days in medium containing steroid-depleted serum caused a significant reduction in the PR band intensity without causing a change in the ratio of PR-A and PR-B or their phosphorylation states. This decrease in the PR band intensity was reversed by maintaining the cells in 1 nM estrogen, but was potentiated by RU486 or ZK98299. These observations support the view that decreased PR levels may play a role in the stimulatory effects of R5020 and RU486 when cells are cultured under non-estrogenized conditions.