Reduction mammaplasty with the "owl" incision and no undermining

Reduction mammaplasty has traditionally been done using the Wise pattern of incision. Because of the box-like effect in breast shape, the lack of projection, and the long scars associated with the inverted T incision, two techniques have emerged as alternatives: the vertical reduction of Lassus/Lejour and the "round block" periareolar technique popularized by Benelli. Each of these techniques has its pros and cons.The "owl" incision combines the features of the large periareolar reduction (Benelli's) and the vertical reduction (Lassus/Lejour); the horizontal inframammary scar is either made very short or completely eliminated. Volume reduction is done through a heart-shaped parenchymal resection, leaving the nipple-areolar complex over a supero-central pedicle. Maintenance of the central parenchyma behind the nipple-areolar complex and mobilization of the vertical pillars toward the center of the breast give excellent projection and diminish the lateral fullness. Enlargement of the periareolar skin resection diminishes the length and pleating of the vertical scar; conversely, inclusion of the vertical component to the periareolar technique eliminates the pleating effect of the periareolar incision. The short horizontal excision eliminates any resultant "dog ears" in the new inframammary fold. Thus, the discrepancy in the length of scars is better distributed. There is no skin or parenchymal undermining, so drains are not needed. Excellent results are obtained immediately on the operating table, and large volumes of glandular resection and correction of severe ptosis can be accomplished without compromising vascularity of either the nipple-areolar complex or the skin flaps.Ninety-four patients in a 7-year period were operated upon using this technique. Seventy-two had bilateral reductions up to 1900 gm per breast, 12 had unilateral reduction for symmetry following breast reconstruction, and 10 were patients with severe ptosis. Complications were rare and of a minor nature. No conversion to free grafts was done, even in the larger resections. One case required minor revision under local anesthesia, one case required bilateral re-reduction, and another case required unilateral re-reduction for continued growth of breast tissue. Almost 90 percent of the patients underwent procedures as outpatients.The owl-type incision and the supero-central pedicle flap are elements of a reduction mammaplasty technique that provides excellent projection and shape with minimal visible scars. It takes advantage of the positive features of the periareolar and vertical reduction techniques and minimizes their negative features. The new design of parenchymal resection improves the vascularity of the residual flaps. Additionally, it may better preserve the sensation to the nipple-areolar complex and lactation is not compromised.     

Reconstruction with bilateral pedicled TRAM flap for paraffinoma breast

Although autogenous tissue can be used to replace unsatisfactory prosthetic breast reconstructions in mastectomy patients, because of the magnitude, complexity, and many potential complications associated with the procedure, combined with a long-term recovery, the use of an implant to replace the mastectomy defect is still the most common method for paraffinoma breast treatment. Between July of 1996 and June of 2003, 21 paraffinoma breast patients underwent bilateral pedicle transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction. There were 10 primary cases that had never been treated before this visit, including a case of unilateral associated breast cancer. There were also 11 secondary cases that had prostheses implanted after removal of materials injected in other clinics. The diagnoses included unacceptable breast contour in 11 patients, breast hardening in 11 patients, palpable nodules in five patients, nipple malposition in four patients, prominent scarring in three patients, breast skin necrosis in one patient, and nipple necrosis in one patient. A 100 percent flap survival rate with no clinical fat necrosis was achieved. There were 11 of 21 abdominal hypertrophic scars, six of 21 prechest (anterior surface of the thorax) hypertrophic scars, and no abdominal hernia; the symmetry satisfaction rate was 100 percent among primary cases and nine of 11 in secondary cases. The breast softness satisfaction rate in primary cases was also 100 percent and nine of 11 for secondary cases. Excellent cosmetic results were achieved in all patients (42 breasts in total). The unfavorable results of the secondary cases (patients with previous treatments) indicate that it is impossible to completely remove all of the injected foreign body by resection. This also means that scar appearance can only be minimized if resection of the entire paraffinoma is performed through a periareolar incision. The excellent results of the primary cases show that immediate autogenous tissue reconstruction should be the first alternative and is the best option for treating foreign-body granuloma breast, given that autogenous tissue is available. Similarly, the results of the secondary cases also demonstrate that autogenous tissue reconstruction could be considered in reversing some unfavorable results of past treatments.     

Subglandular breast reduction: the evolution of a minimal scar approach to breast reduction

The authors describe a new modification of the breast reduction procedure. By means of an inframammary incision, the breast is mobilized from the chest wall, and a "doughnut" annulus of breast tissue is removed from the undersurface of the gland. No skin is excised. The nipple-areola complex is left attached to a central core of breast tissue that receives its blood supply from the subdermal plexus of vessels. When the resulting defect is closed within the breast by strategically placed sutures, the base of the gland is narrowed, the breast is projected forward, and the circumareolar and vertical scars of other techniques are eliminated. The authors report their results in a series of 37 patients.     

Short scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction (SPAIR) mammaplasty

A method of breast reduction is presented that maintains the blood supply and innervation to the nipple and areola complex by means of an inferior pedicle, reduces the breast volume by removing tissue from the periphery of the breast, maintains breast shape with internal plication sutures, and limits the scar using a periareolar technique with a short inferior vertical-to-oblique extension. There were 167 breasts in 98 patients reduced in this fashion. The average resection volume was 632 g per breast, with an average follow-up of 7.6 months. The complication rate was similar to that observed using traditional inferior pedicle techniques with the inverted-T cutaneous scar. This technique has proven to be versatile, technically straightforward, and applicable to breasts of all sizes for both breast reduction and mastopexy. By combining the aesthetic advantage of less cutaneous scarring with the safety and familiarity of the inferiorly based pedicle, superior results in breast reduction can be obtained that are consistent, long-lasting, and satisfying for both patient and surgeon alike.     

Poland's syndrome: correction of thoracic anomaly through minimal incisions

A method that minimizes residual scarring following Poland's syndrome correction by latissimus dorsi muscle transposition and placement of a submuscular breast implant is described. In order to reduce any resulting unsightly scarring and, in particular, eliminate the anterior thoracic scar, both a dorsal S-shape and an axillary incision were made and the muscle flap was raised. A prosthesis was then inserted and the muscle flap sutured to the anterior chest wall through an anterior incision symmetrical to the inferior border of the contralateral areola. The latter is a previously undescribed approach that produces good cosmetic results.     

Reduction mammaplasty with a circular folded pedicle technique.

A personal technique for breast reduction utilizing a circular dermal-breast pedicle is presented. After a cutaneous glandular excision in the inferior pole and glandular excision in a discoid shape under the central area, the pedicle is folded on itself to produce a direct elevation of the nipple-areola complex into its new position, to enhance projection, and to act as a central support. A rational economy of scars is obtained by a central convergence of the breast tissue that stretches the breast periphery and by sutures finishing in the inferoareolar area. There the skin excess is removed to avoid scar lengthening in both the caudal and cranial directions. Evaluation of long-term results reveals maintenance of breast projection, preservation of the inframammary fold to inferior areola distance, and minimal residual scarring.     

Three-dimensional endoscopic midface enhancement: a personal quest for the ideal cheek rejuvenation.

Standard face-lift techniques are excellent for the treatment of the jawline and neck. Treatment of the area between the lower eyelid and the corner of the mouth required the development of techniques in the intermediate lamella of the face. Alternative techniques of subperiosteal dissection by means of lower eyelid incisions were described with good aesthetic results but at the expense of increased morbidity and complications. All these techniques were also two-dimensional manipulations of the soft tissues of the face. The author presents a different approach that he believes is close to the ideal in terms of safety, morbidity, and complications.Although midface rejuvenation may be performed alone, it is more commonly done as a component of total facial rejuvenation. The midface is approached by means of a combination of a temporal slit incision and an upper oral sulcus incision; no eyelid access is used. Fifty percent of the midface dissection is performed under direct visualization, and 50 percent is performed under endoscopic control. Dissection of the temporal area is done under the temporoparietal fascia down to the zygomatic arch. The anterior two-thirds of the zygomatic arch periosteum is elevated along with a few millimeters of the intermediate temporal fascia and the fascia of the masseter muscle. The subperiosteal dissection of the zygoma and maxilla is completed with the medial extension of the dissection just medial to the infraorbital nerve. The orbital fat pads are released by means of intraoral route, and the lateral and middle fat pads are advanced over the orbital rim and fixed to the masseter tendon and the periosteum of the maxillary shelf at the intraoral incision. Three suspension points are typically used on the midface, each one with a different action. All are anchored to the temporal fascia proper. The vascularized Bichat's fat pad is mobilized and fixed with 4-0 polydioxanone sutures. This provides a volumetric cheek augmentation and improvement of the jowl. The inferior malar periosteum and fascia is used for malar imbrication with 4-0 polydioxanone sutures. This provides an anterior projection of the cheek and elevates the corner of the mouth. The suborbicularis oculi fat is used for en bloc vertical suspension of the cheek. This also improves the infraorbital V deformity.This technique has been used in close to 200 patients over the last 5 years. The complications have been minimal: two cases of temporary paresis of the levator of the upper lip, one case of paresis of the orbicularis oris (unilateral), one case of buccinator muscle dysfunction, and two moderate infections that were treated with simple drainage. The degree of facial edema has been minimal compared with the open or the transblepharoplasty approach. Typically, patients can return to work 2 weeks after surgery.The three-dimensional endoscopic midface enhancement provides a technique of midface remodeling that provides the missing dimension (volume) to the rejuvenation of the midface. This can be done with a minimal rate of complications, and the aesthetic results surpass by far the results of other midface techniques previously described by the author.     

Dermal suspension flap in vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty

Reduction mammaplasty has the following goals: appropriate reduction of breast size, symmetric and youthful breast shape, minimal and inconspicuous scars, and stable, long-term results. Although the first two parameters can be obtained by various reduction techniques, vertical-scar mammaplasty eliminates the horizontal inframammary scar, thereby reducing total scar length. Dermal flaps have been described in various types of reduction mammaplasty. The refinement of the authors' method is the incorporation of a superiorly pedicled dermal flap for better and longer-lasting support in vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty. A total of 73 vertical breast reductions in 38 patients were performed with this technique from May of 1996 to November of 1999. Vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty with a dermal suspension flap combines minimal scars with an internal support for long-term stability of the breast shape.     

Refinement of the central pedicle breast reduction by application of the ligamentous suspension

In a previous article, the location of the neurovascular structures inside the breast were exactly determined using a suspension apparatus, and how to access these structures was described. The horizontal septum originates at the level of the fifth rib and curves upward into vertically oriented medial and lateral ligaments, thereby guiding the main vessels and nerves to the nipple and areola. This topographical definition is relevant to increase the precision of resection in breast reductions. In further anatomic dissections of 20 female breasts, it was found that the horizontal septum constantly divides the breast into regular sections and, consequently, it can be used as a guide to achieve symmetry in breast reductions with a central pedicle. Using it provides a more predictable and reliable method of maintaining sensation and viability within the nipple-areola complex and attaining symmetry in both breasts. Because no dermal pedicle is necessary, the size of the resulting scar can be reduced. The suspending function of the ligaments provides improved ability to shape the breast. Using this understanding of the ligamentous suspension of the breast, it has been possible to perform safe breast resections with a central pedicle, irrespective of the amount of resection and risk factors. This new approach has been used on 42 patients.     

Correction of bilateral breast hypoplasia and pectus excavatum with single-unit customized silicone implant

The cosmetic defects of pectus excavatum and bilateral mammary hypoplasia can be corrected with a single-unit customized silicone implant. An extended pocket is made across the anterior chest wall through two inframammary incisions. It is then possible to insert and position the breast prostheses subpectorally and the sternal prosthesis subcutaneously using these incisions. A good cosmetic result can occur with minimal morbidity and scarring.     

Elimination of the vertical scar in reduction mammaplasty.

We describe a technique to eliminate the vertical portion of the inverted-T incision in patients who have combined enlargement of the breasts and moderate to severe ptosis. Initial preoperative markings are made, placing the new nipple site at the level of the transposed inframammary crease. The nipple-areola complex is then retained on a vascularized pedicle, with major reduction of the breast tissue being done in the medial and lateral quadrants. The nipple and breast tissue are then tucked underneath the superior skin segment and placed in this new position as one would do with the umbilicus in an abdominoplasty. Excess vertical skin is removed, and horizontal excess is collected at the midline as a small dog-ear. We have found that this dog-ear reduces markedly with time, rounding out the inferior portion of the breasts. The remaining small amount of excess skin can then be removed under local anesthetic at a later date. We have performed this procedure on 20 patients, with follow-up from 6 to 24 months.     

An improved technique for immediate retropectoral reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy

Subcutaneous mastectomy is becoming an operation of choice in certain cases of premalignant and other breast pathology. We describe a technique for simultaneous subcutaneous mastectomy and retropectoral implantation of a silicone prosthesis. Gentle blunt prepectoral, retromammary dissection is performed through an axillary incision as far inferiorly as the inframammary fold, where a fibrous bridge between the anterior surface of the pectoralis major muscle and the skin prevents dissection any lower. Through the same incision, the retropectoral space is dissected to about 5 cm below the inframammary fold. A second incision is made in the inframammary fold to join the retromammary plane of the first dissection. The gland is then dissected subcutaneously and removed through the inframammary incision. A silicone implant is introduced retropectorally through the axillary incision, thus avoiding splitting the pectoralis major. Satisfactory results have been obtained in 23 bilateral and 14 unilateral cases; it is important that the dissection be performed carefully in order to prevent the implant from riding up too high in its musculoaponeurotic sling.     

Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002

The purpose of this survey was to assess the current trends in breast reduction techniques and to compare satisfaction rates and complications associated with traditional incision and limited incision techniques. In September of 2002, a breast reduction survey was sent to 1500 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 554 of the members returned the survey. Questions elicited categorical answers, and the data were evaluated using the chi-square test and the comparison of two proportions. The results showed that 56 percent of the respondents use only the inferior pedicle and Wise pattern techniques, whereas 6.9 percent of the respondents use only the limited incision techniques. Physician satisfaction was rated as 4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) for both the limited incision and traditional incision groups. Patient satisfaction was rated as 4 for the limited incision group and as 5 for the traditional incision group. This difference in patient satisfaction per surgeon was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The traditional group reported a lower complication rate than did the limited incision group (p < 0.05). The most frequent complications for the traditional incision group were compared with those of the limited incision group. Practice profiles, liposuction, and opinions regarding future changes in breast surgery were also analyzed. The majority of surgeons reported that they did not anticipate changing their practices to accommodate advances in limited incision techniques; however, 89 percent reported that the new limited incision techniques and liposuction are trends that are here to stay.     

Vertical mammaplasty

Current criticisms regarding vertical mammaplasty include problems with poor immediate postoperative appearance, nipple-areola complex malposition, and excessive lower pole length. These problems can be avoided by proper patient selection, by utilizing correct concepts of skin design, and by observing correct glandular resection and closure concepts. Vertical mammaplasty also can result in other problems, such as hypertrophic circumareolar scars and lower pole deformities, including notching, boxy shape, infra-areolar depression, and flatness. These problems are also largely avoidable by using correct technique. Several basic concepts described previously have not proven necessary to achieve good results. Abandoning some of these principles has contributed to the ability to establish an aesthetically ideal breast shape intraoperatively as well as to a decrease in morbidity. This includes eliminating liposuction as a major integral component of the procedure, eliminating suturing the gland to the pectoralis muscle, not undermining the lower pole skin, and avoiding overly wide skin resection and tight wound closure that produces significant lower pole distortion in the early postoperative period. An important concept that has proven reliable is to use a "closed" design that does not predetermine the areolar opening whenever circumstances permit. When this is not possible, a modification that utilizes the smallest possible circumference as an open design is better than a large "mosque." These alternatives allow greater flexibility in determining final nipple position and also reduce the risk of hypertrophic circumareolar scars. Important glandular resection concepts include creating pillars that are attached to both the skin and the chest wall; making them of adequate dimension to avoid postoperative lower pole shape problems, such as flattening; resecting closer to the skin lateral to the pillars to avoid a boxy breast shape; and using a drain both to assist in accurately determining the endpoint of resection and to avoid postoperative seromas. Key closure concepts include approximation of the superior surfaces of the pillars at their base to maintain vertical height and thereby prevent lower pole flattening; approximation of the inferior surfaces of the pillars to the base of the breast to prevent notching; and proper management of the vertical incision by restricting the purse-string suture effect to only the inferior portion of the incision, where there may be skin excess present. Inclusion of these concepts leads to predictable and improved aesthetic results in vertical mammaplasty. This allows full realization of the purported advantages of vertical mammaplasty and allows this method to be utilized with a level of confidence similar to that seen with inverted-T techniques.     

Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience

Recent trends in breast reconstruction have transitioned toward the skin-sparing type of mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using autologous tissue. This study was designed to document trends in the management of patients with unilateral breast cancer and to determine how they influence management of the contralateral breast.All patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospitals from January of 1975 to December of 1999 were reviewed. The cohort was stratified by timing of reconstruction (immediate versus delayed), method of reconstruction, and mastectomy type (skin-sparing versus non-skin-sparing). The methods of reconstruction included implant, latissimus dorsi flap, and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Contralateral procedures to achieve symmetry included augmentation, mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and reduction. A total of 1394 patients were evaluated, including 689 delayed and 705 immediate reconstructions. Sixty-seven percent of delayed-reconstruction patients (462 of 689) had a symmetry procedure performed on the opposite breast, compared with 22 percent for the immediate-reconstruction patients (155 of 705) (p 相似文献   

Face lifts with hidden scars: the vertical U incision

The authors present their latest development of a strictly vertical retroauricular incision to minimize a sequela of a face lift, namely, a visible scar. The temporal preauricular vertical incision and the retroauricular vertical incision form two parallel arms of a U-shaped incision. Anteriorly, a downward rotation flap is made to maintain the horizontal temporal line at the right level, and posteriorly, the scalp is incised vertically, followed by extensive superficial retroauricular undermining. In both temporal and retroauricular areas, skin and scalp undergo a redistribution rather than resection, which is extremely limited. The authors' experience with 100 patients who were operated on with vertical U incisions since April of 2000 is described. A total of 35 patients were evaluated after a 6-month follow-up by using clinical and photographic examinations. There were very few complications because the extensive retroauricular flap has good viability. There were no problems with sensitivity, hair loss, or scar spreading, and the hairline was not displaced. The quality of the scar was excellent in the majority of cases. We experienced only a few hypertrophic but well-hidden scars. This approach can also be used in secondary cases when the primary scar is of good quality. The neck pull is as effective as that in the classic approach with a traverse retroauricular incision. The nondetectability of the retroauricular scar is of special interest in young patients and in men. The authors believe there is no contraindication for this technique. It does not significantly prolong the operating time. It includes a large undermining in the retroauricular area (6 cm from the sulcus), but this dissection is easily performed in the superficial plane. In addition to using fibrin glue in the undermined areas, the authors drain the neck. They do not use dressings. Recovery was fast, and there were only two instances of hematomas and two instances of subcutaneous cervical fluid collections in which patients required treatment.     

The medial periareolar approach to submuscular augmentation mammaplasty under local anesthesia

The medial approach to submuscular augmentation mammaplasty under local anesthesia begins with a medial periareolar incision around one-half or more of the areola. A subcutaneous tunnel is made toward the medial breast border, avoiding mammary ducts and sensory nerves to the nipple. The breast is reflected laterally, exposing a patch of pectoralis major muscle. A submuscular pocket is then created beneath portions of the pectoralis major, rectus abdominis, external oblique abdominis, and serratus anterior muscles, after which the implant is inserted and the muscle, dermis, and skin are closed sequentially. The periareolar incision allows for favorable scars without compromising the access or exposure necessary for accurate implant placement. Complete muscle coverage of the implant should contribute to a lower rate of capsular contracture. With a medial submuscular approach, nipple sensation is rarely altered, and revisions, if necessary, can be done through the same incision, still under local anesthesia, for increased safety, economy, and convenience. The medial approach to breast augmentation is a highly versatile, safe, and consistent method of achieving excellent results in breast augmentation in terms of scar, symmetry, and softness.     

Reconstructive management of contralateral breast cancer in patients who previously underwent unilateral breast reconstruction

When a patient who has had unilateral breast reconstruction presents with a new cancer on the opposite side, the reconstructive management of the second breast can be unclear. This study was performed to determine whether reconstruction of the second breast is oncologically reasonable and to evaluate the reconstructive options available to these patients.Patients who had mastectomy with unilateral breast reconstruction between 1988 and 1994 and who had a minimal follow-up of 5 years from the initial breast cancer were reviewed. Of 469 patients reviewed, 18 patients (4 percent) were identified who developed contralateral breast cancer. Mean age at the initial breast cancer presentation was 43 years (range, 26 to 57 years), and mean age at presentation with contralateral breast cancer was 48 years (range, 36 to 67). The mean interval between the initial and contralateral breast cancer presentations was 5 years (range, 1 to 10 years). Mean follow-up from the time of contralateral breast cancer was 5 years (range, 1 to 9 years). In most cases, contralateral breast cancer presented at an early stage (13 of 18 patients; 72 percent), and a shift to an earlier stage at presentation of the contralateral cancer was evident compared with the initial breast cancer. Of the 18 patients who developed contralateral breast cancer, 16 (89 percent) had no evidence of disease, one was alive with disease, and one died. Reconstructive management after the initial mastectomy included 16 transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps (seven free and nine pedicled), one latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with implant, and one superior gluteal free flap. Surgical management of the second breast after contralateral breast cancer included breast conservation in two patients, mastectomy without reconstruction in four, and mastectomy with reconstruction in 12. Reconstruction of the second breast included one free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, three extended latissimus dorsi flaps, two latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps with implants, three implants alone, two Rubens flaps, and one superior gluteal free flap. No major complications were noted after the reconstruction of the second breast. The best symmetry was obtained when similar methods and tissues were used on both sides.The incidence of contralateral breast cancer after mastectomy and unilateral breast reconstruction is low. In most cases, contralateral breast cancer presents at an earlier stage compared with the initial breast cancer, and the prognosis is good. In patients who develop a contralateral breast cancer after mastectomy and unilateral breast reconstruction, the reconstruction of the second breast after mastectomy is oncologically reasonable and should be offered to provide optimal breast symmetry and a better quality of life. The best result is obtained when similar methods and tissues are used on both sides.     

Maximizing the use of the abdominoplasty incision

Candidates for abdominoplasty often request multiple procedures at the time of consultation. Some of these patients have the potential opportunity to have ancillary procedures performed through the abdominoplasty incision, such as breast augmentation or suction-assisted lipectomy. Access via the abdominoplasty incision can also limit the need for distant donor sites, for instance, when autologous fillers or rib graft are necessary. The techniques described are straightforward and are based on standard principles that should be considered when ancillary procedures are performed in conjunction with abdominal contouring procedures. In a review of 70 consecutive patients undergoing abdominoplasty, 91 ancillary procedures were performed in conjunction with the abdominoplasty. Of the total number of patients undergoing abdominoplasty, 29 patients underwent 30 procedures facilitated through their abdominoplasty incision, including 23 suction-assisted lipectomies of the flanks, six breast augmentations, and one rib cartilage harvesting for rhinoplasty. A review of the author's experience and discussion for potential options afforded by this exposure are presented.