Pseudotyping Incompatibility between HIV-1 and Gibbon Ape Leukemia Virus Env Is Modulated by Vpu

The Env protein from gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been shown to be incompatible with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in the production of infectious pseudotyped particles. This incompatibility has been mapped to the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env. Surprisingly, we found that the HIV-1 accessory protein Vpu modulates this incompatibility. The infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with murine leukemia virus (MLV) Env was not affected by Vpu. However, the infectivity of HIV-1 pseudotyped with an MLV Env with the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env (MLV/GaLV Env) was restricted 50- to 100-fold by Vpu. A Vpu mutant containing a scrambled membrane-spanning domain, Vpu_RD, was still able to restrict MLV/GaLV Env, but mutation of the serine residues at positions 52 and 56 completely alleviated the restriction. Loss of infectivity appeared to be caused by reduced MLV/GaLV Env incorporation into viral particles. The mechanism of this downmodulation appears to be distinct from Vpu-mediated CD4 downmodulation because Vpu-expressing cells that failed to produce infectious HIV-1 particles nonetheless continued to display robust surface MLV/GaLV Env expression. In addition, if MLV and HIV-1 were simultaneously introduced into the same cells, only the HIV-1 particle infectivity was restricted by Vpu. Collectively, these data suggest that Vpu modulates the cellular distribution of MLV/GaLV Env, preventing its recruitment to HIV-1 budding sites.The gammaretrovirus gibbon ape leukemia virus (GaLV) has been widely used for gene therapy because of its wide host cell tropism and nonpathogenicity (1, 6, 10, 12, 13, 20). The host cell receptor for GaLV Env has been cloned and identified as a sodium-dependent phosphate transporter protein (25, 26). Like other retroviruses, GaLV encodes a single transmembrane surface glycoprotein (GaLV Env), which is cleaved into surface (SU) and transmembrane (TM) subunits (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). The TM domain of GaLV Env contains a short 30-amino-acid C-terminal cytoplasmic tail. Although GaLV Env functions well when coupled (pseudotyped) with murine leukemia virus (MLV)-based retroviral vectors, it has been shown to be completely incompatible with HIV-1 (4, 35). When GaLV Env is expressed with HIV-1, essentially no infectious HIV-1 particles are produced (4, 35). The mechanism for this infectivity downmodulation is unknown, but the component of GaLV Env responsible for the restriction has been mapped to the cytoplasmic tail. Replacing the cytoplasmic tail of GaLV Env with the equivalent sequence from MLV Env ameliorates the restriction. Likewise, replacing the cytoplasmic tail of MLV Env with that from GaLV Env confers the restriction (4).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Schematic of MLV Env protein. Sequences are the C-terminal cytoplasmic tails of MLV Env, GaLV Env, and human CD4. GaLV sequences in boldface are residues that have been shown to modulate the HIV-1 incompatibility (4). Underlined sequences in CD4 are amino acids required for Vpu-mediated downmodulation (2, 15). Arrows denote the location of MLV/GaLV tail substitution. SU, surface domain; TM, transmembrane domain.Vpu is an 81-amino-acid HIV-1 accessory protein produced from the same mRNA as the HIV-1 Env gene. The N terminus of Vpu contains a membrane-spanning domain, followed by a 50-amino-acid cytoplasmic domain. Vpu is unique to HIV-1 and a few closely related SIV strains. The best-characterized roles for Vpu in the HIV-1 life cycle are modulation of host proteins CD4 and tetherin (also known as BST-2, CD317, and HM1.24) (24, 38, 39). Vpu promotes the degradation of CD4 in the endoplasmic reticulum through a proteasome-dependent mechanism (29). The cytoplasmic tail of Vpu physically interacts with the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 and recruits the human β-transducing repeat-containing protein (β-TrCP) and E3 ubiquitin ligase components to polyubiquitinate and ultimately trigger the degradation of CD4 (18). Two serine residues at positions 52 and 56 of Vpu are phosphorylated by casein kinase-2 and are required for CD4 degradation (31, 32). The membrane-spanning domain of Vpu is not specifically required for CD4 degradation. A mutant protein containing a scrambled membrane-spanning sequence, Vpu_RD, is still able to trigger the degradation of CD4 (32). The region of CD4 that is targeted by Vpu is approximately 17 to 13 amino acids from the C terminus in the cytoplasmic tail (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (2, 15).In addition to degrading CD4, Vpu has also long been known to result in enhanced viral release (EVR) in certain cell lines (14, 36). Recently, the type I interferon-induced host protein tetherin was identified as being responsible for this Vpu-modulated restriction (24, 38). In the absence of Vpu, tetherin causes particles to remain tethered (hence the name) to the host cell postfission. Although Vpu counteracts the function of tetherin, the exact mechanism has not been fully elucidated. However, the mechanism for tetherin antagonism appears to be distinct from that for modulating CD4. Mutation of the serines 52 and 56 of Vpu abolish CD4 degradation, but only reduce EVR activity (5, 17, 21, 32). Some EVR activity remains even when much of the Vpu cytoplasmic tail is deleted (30). In addition, many mutations in the membrane-spanning domain, such as Vpu_RD, do not affect CD4 degradation and yet completely abolish EVR activity (27, 30, 37). The critical residues in tetherin for recognition by Vpu appear to be in the membrane-spanning domain and not the cytoplasmic tail (9, 19, 28). Although β-TrCP is required for complete EVR activity, there is no consensus whether the degradation of tetherin is proteasome or lysosome mediated (5, 7, 21) or whether degradation is required at all. In some cases there can be some EVR activity in the absence of tetherin degradation (17, 22).We demonstrate here that Vpu is responsible for the incompatibility between HIV-1 and GaLV Env. Glycoproteins containing the cytoplasmic tail from GaLV Env are prevented from being incorporated into HIV-1 particles by Vpu, effectively reducing infectious particle production by 50- to 100-fold. The serines at positions 52 and 56 are required for this restriction, but the membrane-spanning domain is not. Although the mechanism for this restriction appears similar to CD4 degradation, there are apparent differences. Vpu does not prevent surface expression, and it does not prevent its incorporation into MLV particles. Therefore, the mechanism of restriction appears to involve a system that does not rely directly on global protein degradation.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Potent and Broadly Reactive HIV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies Elicited by a Vaccinia Virus Vector Prime-C2V3C3 Polypeptide Boost Immunization Strategy

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection affects about 1 to 2 million individuals, the majority living in West Africa, Europe, and India. As for HIV-1, new strategies for the prevention of HIV-2 infection are needed. Our aim was to produce new vaccine immunogens that elicit the production of broadly reactive HIV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Native and truncated envelope proteins from the reference HIV-2ALI isolate were expressed in vaccinia virus or in bacteria. This source isolate was used due to its unique phenotype combining CD4 independence and CCR5 usage. NAbs were not elicited in BALB/c mice by single immunization with a truncated and fully glycosylated envelope gp125 (gp125t) or a recombinant polypeptide comprising the C2, V3, and C3 envelope regions (rpC2-C3). A strong and broad NAb response was, however, elicited in mice primed with gp125t expressed in vaccinia virus and boosted with rpC2-C3. Serum from these animals potently neutralized (median 50% neutralizing titer, 3,200) six of six highly divergent primary HIV-2 isolates. Coreceptor usage and the V3 sequence of NAb-sensitive isolates were similar to that of the vaccinating immunogen (HIV-2ALI). In contrast, NAbs were not reactive on three X4 isolates that displayed major changes in V3 loop sequence and structure. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that broadly reactive HIV-2 NAbs can be elicited by using a vaccinia virus vector-prime/rpC2-C3-boost immunization strategy and suggest a potential relationship between escape to neutralization and cell tropism.Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection affects 1 to 2 million individuals, most of whom live in India, West Africa, and Europe (17). HIV-2 has diversified into eight genetic groups named A to H, of which group A is by far the most prevalent worldwide. Nucleotide sequences of Env can differ up to 21% within a particular group and by over 35% between groups.The mortality rate in HIV-2-infected patients is at least twice that of uninfected individuals (26). Nonetheless, the majority of HIV-2-infected individuals survive as elite controllers (17). In the absence of antiretroviral therapy, the numbers of infected cells (39) and viral loads (36) are much lower among HIV-2-infected individuals than among those who are HIV-1 infected. This may be related to a more effective immune response produced against HIV-2. In fact, most HIV-2-infected individuals have proliferative T-cell responses and strong cytotoxic responses to Env and Gag proteins (17, 31). Moreover, autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are raised in most HIV-2-infected individuals (8, 32, 48, 52), and the virus seems unable to escape from these antibodies (52). As for HIV-1, the antibody specificities that mediate HIV-2 neutralization and control are still elusive. The V3 region in the envelope gp125 has been identified as a neutralizing target by some but not by all investigators (3, 6, 7, 11, 40, 47, 54). Other weakly neutralizing epitopes were identified in the V1, V2, V4, and C5 regions in gp125 and in the COOH-terminal region of the gp41 ectodomain (6, 7, 41). A better understanding of the neutralizing determinants in the HIV-2 Env will provide crucial information regarding the most relevant targets for vaccine design.The development of immunogens that elicit the production of broadly reactive NAbs is considered the number one priority for the HIV-1 vaccine field (4, 42). Most current HIV-1 vaccine candidates intended to elicit such broadly reactive NAbs are based on purified envelope constructs that mimic the structure of the most conserved neutralizing epitopes in the native trimeric Env complex and/or on the expression of wild-type or modified envelope glycoproteins by different types of expression vectors (4, 5, 29, 49, 58). With respect to HIV-2, purified gp125 glycoprotein or synthetic peptides representing selected V3 regions from HIV-2 strain SBL6669 induced autologous and heterologous NAbs in mice or guinea pigs (6, 7, 22). However, immunization of cynomolgus monkeys with a subunit vaccine consisting of gp130 (HIV-2BEN) micelles offered little protection against autologous or heterologous challenge (34). Immunization of rhesus (19, 44, 45) and cynomolgus (1) monkeys with canarypox or attenuated vaccinia virus expressing several HIV-2 SBL6669 proteins, including the envelope glycoproteins, in combination with booster immunizations with gp160, gp125, or V3 synthetic peptides, elicited a weak neutralizing response and partial protection against autologous HIV-2 challenge. Likewise, vaccination of rhesus monkeys with immunogens derived from the historic HIV-2ROD strain failed to generate neutralizing antibodies and to protect against heterologous challenge (55). Finally, baboons inoculated with a DNA vaccine expressing the tat, nef, gag, and env genes of the HIV-2UC2 group B isolate were partially protected against autologous challenge without the production of neutralizing antibodies (33). These studies illustrate the urgent need for new vaccine immunogens and/or vaccination strategies that elicit the production of broadly reactive NAbs against HIV-2. The present study was designed to investigate in the mouse model the immunogenicity and neutralizing response elicited by novel recombinant envelope proteins derived from the reference primary HIV-2ALI isolate, when administered alone or in different prime-boost combinations.     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Preinfection Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Failed To Prevent HIV Type 1 Infection from Strains Genetically Unrelated to Viruses in Long-Term Exposed Partners

Understanding the mechanisms underlying potential altered susceptibility to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) individuals and the later clinical consequences of breakthrough infection can provide insight into strategies to control HIV-1 with an effective vaccine. From our Seattle ES cohort, we identified one individual (LSC63) who seroconverted after over 2 years of repeated unprotected sexual contact with his HIV-1-infected partner (P63) and other sexual partners of unknown HIV-1 serostatus. The HIV-1 variants infecting LSC63 were genetically unrelated to those sequenced from P63. This may not be surprising, since viral load measurements in P63 were repeatedly below 50 copies/ml, making him an unlikely transmitter. However, broad HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses were detected in LSC63 before seroconversion. Compared to those detected after seroconversion, these responses were of lower magnitude and half of them targeted different regions of the viral proteome. Strong HLA-B27-restricted CTLs, which have been associated with disease control, were detected in LSC63 after but not before seroconversion. Furthermore, for the majority of the protein-coding regions of the HIV-1 variants in LSC63 (except gp41, nef, and the 3′ half of pol), the genetic distances between the infecting viruses and the viruses to which he was exposed through P63 (termed the exposed virus) were comparable to the distances between random subtype B HIV-1 sequences and the exposed viruses. These results suggest that broad preinfection immune responses were not able to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection in LSC63, even though the infecting viruses were not particularly distant from the viruses that may have elicited these responses.Understanding the mechanisms of altered susceptibility or control of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in highly exposed seronegative (ES) persons may provide invaluable information aiding the design of HIV-1 vaccines and therapy (9, 14, 15, 33, 45, 57, 58). In a cohort of female commercial sex workers in Nairobi, Kenya, a small proportion of individuals remained seronegative for over 3 years despite the continued practice of unprotected sex (12, 28, 55, 56). Similarly, resistance to HIV-1 infection has been reported in homosexual men who frequently practiced unprotected sex with infected partners (1, 15, 17, 21, 61). Multiple factors have been associated with the resistance to HIV-1 infection in ES individuals (32), including host genetic factors (8, 16, 20, 37-39, 44, 46, 47, 49, 59, 63), such as certain HLA class I and II alleles (41), as well as cellular (1, 15, 26, 55, 56), humoral (25, 29), and innate immune responses (22, 35).Seroconversion in previously HIV-resistant Nairobi female commercial sex workers, despite preexisting HIV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) responses, has been reported (27). Similarly, 13 of 125 ES enrollees in our Seattle ES cohort (1, 15, 17) have become late seroconverters (H. Zhu, T. Andrus, Y. Liu, and T. Zhu, unpublished observations). Here, we analyze the virology, genetics, and immune responses of HIV-1 infection in one of the later seroconverting subjects, LSC63, who had developed broad CTL responses before seroconversion.     

Compartmentalization and Clonal Amplification of HIV-1 Variants in the Cerebrospinal Fluid during Primary Infection

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-associated dementia (HAD) is a severe neurological disease that affects a subset of HIV-1-infected individuals. Increased compartmentalization has been reported between blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HIV-1 populations in subjects with HAD, but it is still not known when compartmentalization arises during the course of infection. To assess HIV-1 genetic compartmentalization early during infection, we compared HIV-1 populations in the peripheral blood and CSF in 11 primary infection subjects, with analysis of longitudinal samples over the first 18 months for a subset of subjects. We used heteroduplex tracking assays targeting the variable regions of env and single-genome amplification and sequence analysis of the full-length env gene to identify CSF-compartmentalized variants and to examine viral genotypes within the compartmentalized populations. For most subjects, HIV-1 populations were equilibrated between the blood and CSF compartments. However, compartmentalized HIV-1 populations were detected in the CSF of three primary infection subjects, and longitudinal analysis of one subject revealed that compartmentalization during primary HIV-1 infection was resolved. Clonal amplification of specific HIV-1 variants was identified in the CSF population of one primary infection subject. Our data show that compartmentalization can occur in the central nervous system (CNS) of subjects in primary HIV-1 infection in part through persistence of the putative transmitted parental variant or via viral genetic adaptation to the CNS environment. The presence of distinct HIV-1 populations in the CSF indicates that independent HIV-1 replication can occur in the CNS, even early after HIV-1 transmission.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection of the central nervous system (CNS) can lead to neurological disease in a subset of HIV-infected individuals and may include the development of HIV-1-associated dementia (HAD) (2, 18). HAD is characterized by severe neurological dysfunction, and affected individuals generally have impaired cognitive and motor functions. HIV-1 enters the CNS during primary infection, most likely via the migration of infected monocytes and lymphocytes across the blood-brain barrier (33, 37, 42). The main cell types in the CNS that HIV-1 can productively infect are the perivascular macrophages and microglial cells, which express low receptor densities of CD4, CCR5, and CXCR4 (7, 18, 60, 63). Previous studies have also reported that neurotropic HIV-1 variants are generally macrophage tropic (19, 20, 32, 45, 52, 61). Although cells in the CNS may be infected with HIV-1 during the course of disease, it is still unclear whether productive HIV-1 replication occurs in the CNS early during infection.Genetically compartmentalized HIV-1 variants have been detected in the brains of HAD subjects at autopsy (13, 14, 43, 48, 52) and in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of HAD subjects sampled over the course of infection (26, 46, 51, 59). Extensive compartmentalization between the periphery and the CNS has been reported in subjects with HAD; however, it is not yet known when compartmentalization occurs during the course of HIV-1 infection. Primary HIV-1 infection refers to the acute and early phases of infection, during which peak plasma viremia often occurs and a viral “set point” may be reached (8, 34), within the first year after HIV exposure (64). Studies examining compartmentalization between the blood plasma and CSF during primary infection have been limited, and extensive compartmentalization has not been detected in primary infection subjects (26, 50).In this study, we examined HIV-1 genetic compartmentalization between the peripheral blood and CSF during primary HIV-1 infection. Cross-sectional and longitudinal blood plasma and CSF samples were analyzed for viral compartmentalization using the heteroduplex tracking assay (HTA) and single genome amplification (SGA). We used the HTA to differentiate between HIV-1 variants in the CSF that were either compartmentalized to the CSF or equilibrated with the peripheral blood. Previous studies have used the HTA to separate HIV-1 genetic variants in different anatomical compartments (10, 24, 27, 51) and to follow HIV-1 evolutionary variants over the course of infection (9, 25, 31, 41, 49, 50). We also conducted SGA on a subset of subjects to further examine viral genetic compartmentalization during primary infection. Here we report the detection of compartmentalized and clonally amplified HIV-1 variants in the CSF of subjects in the primary stage of HIV-1 infection. Our results suggest that minor to extensive HIV-1 genetic compartmentalization can occur between the periphery and the CNS during primary HIV-1 infection and that viral compartmentalization, as measured in the CSF, is transient in some subjects.     

Virological Synapse-Mediated Spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 between T Cells Is Sensitive to Entry Inhibition

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can disseminate between CD4⁺ T cells via diffusion-limited cell-free viral spread or by directed cell-cell transfer using virally induced structures termed virological synapses. Although T-cell virological synapses have been well characterized, it is unclear whether this mode of viral spread is susceptible to inhibition by neutralizing antibodies and entry inhibitors. We show here that both cell-cell and cell-free viral spread are equivalently sensitive to entry inhibition. Fluorescence imaging analysis measuring virological synapse lifetimes and inhibitor time-of-addition studies implied that inhibitors can access preformed virological synapses and interfere with HIV-1 cell-cell infection. This concept was supported by electron tomography that revealed the T-cell virological synapse to be a relatively permeable structure. Virological synapse-mediated HIV-1 spread is thus efficient but is not an immune or entry inhibitor evasion mechanism, a result that is encouraging for vaccine and drug design.As with enveloped viruses from several viral families, the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can disseminate both by fluid-phase diffusion of viral particles and by directed cell-cell transfer (39). The primary target cell for HIV-1 replication in vivo is the CD4⁺ T-cell (13), which is infectible by CCR5-tropic (R5) and CXCR4-tropic (X4) viral variants (29). R5 HIV-1 is the major transmitted viral phenotype and dominates the global pandemic, whereas X4 virus is found later in infection in ca. 50% of infected individuals, and its presence indicates a poor disease progression prognosis (23). Cell-cell HIV-1 transfer between T cells is more efficient than diffusion-limited spread (8, 16, 32, 38), although recent estimates for the differential range from approximately 1 (42) to 4 (6) orders of magnitude. Two structures have been proposed to support contact-mediated intercellular movement of HIV-1 between T cells: membrane nanotubes (33, 43) and macromolecular adhesive contacts termed virological synapses (VS) (15, 17, 33). VS appear to be the dominant structure involved in T-cell-T-cell spread (33), and both X4 (17) and R5 HIV-1 (6, 15, 42) can spread between T cells via this mechanism.VS assembly and function are dependent on HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) engaging its primary cellular receptor CD4 (2, 6, 17). This interaction recruits more CD4 and coreceptor to the site of cell-cell contact in an actin-dependent manner (17). Adhesion molecules cluster at the intercellular junction and are thought to stabilize the VS (18). In parallel, viral Env and Gag are recruited to the interface by a microtubule-dependent mechanism (19), where polarized viral budding may release virions into the synaptic space across which the target cell is infected (17). The precise mechanism by which HIV-1 subsequently enters the target T-cell cytoplasm remains unclear: by fusion directly at the plasma membrane, fusion from within an endosomal compartment, or both (4, 6, 15, 25, 34).Viruses from diverse families including herpesviruses (9), poxviruses (22) and hepatitis C virus (44) evade neutralizing antibody attack by direct cell-cell spread, since the tight junctions across which the these viruses move are antibody impermeable. It has been speculated that transfer of HIV-1 across VS may promote evasion from immune or therapeutic intervention with the inference that the junctions formed in retroviral VS may be nonpermissive to antibody entry (39). However, available evidence regarding whether neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and other entry inhibitors can inhibit HIV-1 cell-cell spread is inconsistent (25). An early analysis suggested that HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread is relatively resistant to neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (NMAb) (12). A later study agreed with this conclusion by demonstrating a lack of permissivity of HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread, measured by transfer of viral Gag, to interference with viral fusion using a gp41-specific NMAb and a peptidic fusion inhibitor (6). In contrast, another analysis reported that anti-gp41-specific NMAb interfered effectively with HIV-1 spread between T cells (26). Inhibitors of the HIV-1 surface glycoprotein (gp120)-CD4 or gp120-CXCR4 interaction reduced X4 HIV-1 VS assembly and viral transfer if applied prior to mixing of infected and receptor-expressing target cells (17, 19), but the effect of these inhibitors has not been tested on preformed VS. Thus, the field is currently unclear on whether direct T-cell-T-cell infectious HIV-1 spread is susceptible or not to antibody and entry inhibitor-mediated disruption of VS assembly, and the related question, whether the VS is permeable to viral entry inhibitors, including NAb. Addressing these questions is of central importance to understanding HIV-1 pathogenesis and informing future drug and vaccine design.Since estimates reported in the literature of the relative efficiency of direct HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread compared to cell-free spread vary by approximately 3 orders of magnitude (6, 38, 42), and the evidence for the activity of viral entry inhibitors on cell-cell spread is conflicting, we set out to quantify the efficiency of infection across the T-cell VS and analyze the susceptibility of this structure to NAb and viral entry inhibitors. Assays reporting on events proximal to productive infection show that the R5 HIV-1 T-cell VS is approximately 1 order of magnitude more efficient than cell-free virus infection, and imaging analyses reveal that the VS assembled by HIV-1 is most likely permeable to inhibitors both during, and subsequent to, VS assembly. Thus, we conclude that the T-cell VS does not provide a privileged environment allowing HIV-1 escape from entry inhibition.     

Cell-Cell Spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Overcomes Tetherin/BST-2-Mediated Restriction in T cells

Direct cell-to-cell spread of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) between T cells at the virological synapse (VS) is an efficient mechanism of viral dissemination. Tetherin (BST-2/CD317) is an interferon-induced, antiretroviral restriction factor that inhibits nascent cell-free particle release. The HIV-1 Vpu protein antagonizes tetherin activity; however, whether tetherin also restricts cell-cell spread is unclear. We performed quantitative cell-to-cell transfer analysis of wild-type (WT) or Vpu-defective HIV-1 in Jurkat and primary CD4⁺ T cells, both of which express endogenous levels of tetherin. We found that Vpu-defective HIV-1 appeared to disseminate more efficiently by cell-to-cell contact between Jurkat cells under conditions where tetherin restricted cell-free virion release. In T cells infected with Vpu-defective HIV-1, tetherin was enriched at the VS, and VS formation was increased compared to the WT, correlating with an accumulation of virus envelope proteins on the cell surface. Increasing tetherin expression with type I interferon had only minor effects on cell-to-cell transmission. Furthermore, small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion of tetherin decreased VS formation and cell-to-cell transmission of both Vpu-defective and WT HIV-1. Taken together, these data demonstrate that tetherin does not restrict VS-mediated T cell-to-T cell transfer of Vpu-defective HIV-1 and suggest that under some circumstances tetherin might promote cell-to-cell transfer, either by mediating the accumulation of virions on the cell surface or by regulating integrity of the VS. If so, inhibition of tetherin activity by Vpu may balance requirements for efficient cell-free virion production and cell-to-cell transfer of HIV-1 in the face of antiviral immune responses.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 can disseminate between and within hosts by cell-free infection or by direct cell-cell spread. Cell-cell spread of HIV-1 between CD4⁺ T cells is an efficient means of viral dissemination (65) and has been estimated to be several orders of magnitude more rapid than cell-free virus infection (6, 8, 41, 64, 74). Cell-cell transmission of HIV-1 takes place at the virological synapse (VS), a multimolecular structure that forms at the interface between an HIV-1-infected T cell and an uninfected target T cell during intercellular contact (27). Related structures that facilitate cell-cell spread of HIV-1 between dendritic cells and T cells (42) and between macrophages and T cells (16, 17) and for cell-cell spread of the related retrovirus human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) (24) have also been described. Moreover, more long-range cell-cell transfer can occur via cellular projections, including filopodia (71) and membrane nanotubes (75). The VS is initiated by binding of the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env), which is expressed on the surfaces of infected T cells, to HIV-1 entry receptors (CD4 and either CXCR4 or CCR5) present on the target cell membrane (6, 22, 27, 41, 61, 73). Interactions between LFA-1 and ICAM-1 and ICAM-3 further stabilize the conjugate interface and, together with Env receptor binding, help trigger the recruitment of viral proteins, CD4/coreceptor, and integrins to the contact site (27, 28, 61). The enrichment of viral and cellular proteins at the VS is an active process, dependent on cytoskeletal remodeling, and in the infected T cell both the actin and tubulin network regulate polarization of HIV-1 proteins at the cell-cell interface, thus directing HIV-1 assembly and egress toward the engaged target cell (27, 29). Virus is transferred by budding into the synaptic cleft, and virions subsequently attach to the target cell membrane to mediate entry, either by fusion at the plasma membrane or possibly following endocytic uptake (2, 22). In this way, the VS promotes more rapid infection kinetics and may enhance HIV-1 pathogenesis in vivo.Cells have evolved a number of barriers to resist invading microorganisms. One mechanism that appears to be particularly important in counteracting HIV-1 infection is a group of interferon-inducible, innate restriction factors that includes TRIM5α, APOBEC3G, and tetherin (38, 49, 69, 79). Tetherin (BST-2/CD317) is a host protein expressed by many cell types, including CD4⁺ T cells, that acts at a late stage of the HIV-1 life cycle to trap (or “tether”) mature virions at the plasma membranes of virus-producing cells, thereby inhibiting cell-free virus release (49, 56, 81). This antiviral activity of tetherin is not restricted to HIV-1, and tetherin can also inhibit the release of other enveloped viruses from infected cells (31, 40, 54, 62). What the cellular function of tetherin is besides its antiviral activity is unclear, but because expression is upregulated following alpha/beta interferon (IFN-α/β) treatment (1) and tetherin can restrict a range of enveloped viruses, tetherin has been postulated to be a broad-acting mediator of the innate immune defense against enveloped viruses.To circumvent restriction of particle release, HIV-1 encodes the 16-kDa accessory protein Vpu, which antagonizes tetherin and restores normal virus budding (47, 78). The molecular mechanisms by which Vpu does this are not entirely clear, but evidence suggests that Vpu may exert its antagonistic function by downregulating tetherin from the cell surface, trapping it in the trans-Golgi network (10) and targeting it for degradation by the proteasome (12, 39, 81) or lysosome (9, 25, 44); however, degradation of tetherin may be dispensable for Vpu activity (13), and in HIV-1-infected T cells, surface downregulation of tetherin has been reported to be minor (45), suggesting that global removal of tetherin from the plasma membrane may not be necessary to antagonize its function.Tetherin-mediated restriction of HIV-1 and antagonism by Vpu have been the focus of much research, and inhibition of cell-free virus infection has been well documented (33, 47-49, 77, 81, 82). In contrast, less studied is the impact of tetherin on direct cell-cell dissemination. For example, it is not clear if tetherin-mediated restriction inhibits T cell-T cell spread as efficiently as cell-free release or whether tetherin affects VS formation. To address these questions, we analyzed Vpu⁺ and Vpu⁻ viruses for their ability to spread directly between Jurkat T cells and primary CD4⁺ T cells in the presence or absence of endogenous tetherin. Our data suggest that tetherin does not restrict HIV-1 in the context of cell-to-cell transmission of virus between T cells expressing endogenous tetherin. Interestingly, we also that observed that Vpu-defective virus may disseminate more efficiently by cell-cell spread at the VS. We postulate that cell-cell spread may favor viral pathogenesis by allowing HIV-1 to disseminate in the presence of tetherin during an interferon-producing innate response.