共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
2.
Relatively little is known about the small subset of peroxisomal proteins with predicted protease activity. Here, we report that the peroxisomal LON2 (At5g47040) protease facilitates matrix protein import into Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) peroxisomes. We identified T-DNA insertion alleles disrupted in five of the nine confirmed or predicted peroxisomal proteases and found only two—lon2 and deg15, a mutant defective in the previously described PTS2-processing protease (DEG15/At1g28320)—with phenotypes suggestive of peroxisome metabolism defects. Both lon2 and deg15 mutants were mildly resistant to the inhibitory effects of indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) on root elongation, but only lon2 mutants were resistant to the stimulatory effects of IBA on lateral root production or displayed Suc dependence during seedling growth. lon2 mutants displayed defects in removing the type 2 peroxisome targeting signal (PTS2) from peroxisomal malate dehydrogenase and reduced accumulation of 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, another PTS2-containing protein; both defects were not apparent upon germination but appeared in 5- to 8-d-old seedlings. In lon2 cotyledon cells, matrix proteins were localized to peroxisomes in 4-d-old seedlings but mislocalized to the cytosol in 8-d-old seedlings. Moreover, a PTS2-GFP reporter sorted to peroxisomes in lon2 root tip cells but was largely cytosolic in more mature root cells. Our results indicate that LON2 is needed for sustained matrix protein import into peroxisomes. The delayed onset of matrix protein sorting defects may account for the relatively weak Suc dependence following germination, moderate IBA-resistant primary root elongation, and severe defects in IBA-induced lateral root formation observed in lon2 mutants.Peroxisomes are single-membrane-bound organelles found in most eukaryotes. Peroxin (PEX) proteins are necessary for various aspects of peroxisome biogenesis, including matrix protein import (for review, see Distel et al., 1996; Schrader and Fahimi, 2008). Most matrix proteins are imported into peroxisomes from the cytosol using one of two targeting signals, a C-terminal type 1 peroxisome-targeting signal (PTS1) or a cleavable N-terminal type 2 peroxisome-targeting signal (PTS2) (Reumann, 2004). PTS1- and PTS2-containing proteins are bound in the cytosol by soluble matrix protein receptors, escorted to the peroxisome membrane docking complex, and translocated into the peroxisome matrix (for review, see Platta and Erdmann, 2007). Once in the peroxisome, many matrix proteins participate in metabolic pathways, such as β-oxidation, hydrogen peroxide decomposition, and photorespiration (for review, see Gabaldon et al., 2006; Poirier et al., 2006).In addition to metabolic enzymes, several proteases are found in the peroxisome matrix. Only one protease, DEG15/Tysnd1, has a well-defined role in peroxisome biology. The rat Tysnd1 protease removes the targeting signal after PTS2-containing proteins enter the peroxisome and also processes certain PTS1-containing β-oxidation enzymes (Kurochkin et al., 2007). Similarly, the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) Tysnd1 homolog DEG15 (At1g28320) is a peroxisomal Ser protease that removes PTS2 targeting signals (Helm et al., 2007; Schuhmann et al., 2008).In contrast with DEG15, little is known about the other eight Arabidopsis proteins that are annotated as proteases in the AraPerox database of putative peroxisomal proteins (Reumann et al., 2004; Carter et al., 2004; Shimaoka et al., 2004), which, in combination with the minor PTS found in both of these predicted proteases (Reumann, 2004), suggests that these enzymes may not be peroxisomal. Along with DEG15, only two of the predicted peroxisomal proteases, an M16 metalloprotease (At2g41790), which we have named PXM16 for peroxisomal M16 protease, and a Lon-related protease (At5g47040/LON2; Ostersetzer et al., 2007), are found in the proteome of peroxisomes purified from Arabidopsis suspension cells (Eubel et al., 2008). DEG15 and LON2 also have been validated as peroxisomally targeted using GFP fusions (Ostersetzer et al., 2007; Schuhmann et al., 2008).
Open in a separate windowaMajor PTS1 (Reumann, 2004).bMinor PTS1 (Reumann, 2004).cValidated PTS1 (Reumann et al., 2007).dMinor PTS2 (Reumann, 2004).PXM16 is the only one of the nine Arabidopsis M16 (pitrilysin family) metalloproteases (García-Lorenzo et al., 2006; Rawlings et al., 2008) containing a predicted PTS. M16 subfamilies B and C contain the plastid and mitochondrial processing peptidases (for review, see Schaller, 2004), whereas PXM16 belongs to M16 subfamily A, which includes insulin-degrading peptidases (Schaller, 2004). A tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) M16 subfamily A protease similar to insulin-degrading enzymes with a putative PTS1 was identified in a screen for proteases that cleave the wound response peptide hormone systemin (Strassner et al., 2002), but the role of Arabidopsis PXM16 is unknown.Arabidopsis LON2 is a typical Lon protease with three conserved domains: an N-terminal domain, a central ATPase domain in the AAA family, and a C-terminal protease domain with a Ser-Lys catalytic dyad (Fig. 1A; Lee and Suzuki, 2008). Lon proteases are found in prokaryotes and in some eukaryotic organelles (Fig. 1C) and participate in protein quality control by cleaving unfolded proteins and can regulate metabolism by controlling levels of enzymes from many pathways, including cell cycle, metabolism, and stress responses (for review, see Tsilibaris et al., 2006). Four Lon homologs are encoded in the Arabidopsis genome; isoforms have been identified in mitochondria, plastids, and peroxisomes (Ostersetzer et al., 2007; Eubel et al., 2008; Rawlings et al., 2008). Mitochondrial Lon protesases are found in a variety of eukaryotes (Fig. 1A) and function both as ATP-dependent proteases and as chaperones promoting protein complex assemblies (Lee and Suzuki, 2008). LON2 is the only Arabidopsis Lon isoform with a canonical C-terminal PTS1 (SKL-COOH; Ostersetzer et al., 2007) or found in the peroxisome proteome (Eubel et al., 2008; Reumann et al., 2009). Functional studies have been conducted with peroxisomal Lon isoforms found in the proteome of peroxisomes purified from rat hepatic cells (pLon; Kikuchi et al., 2004) and the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha (Pln; Aksam et al., 2007). Rat pLon interacts with β-oxidation enzymes, and a cell line expressing a dominant negative pLon variant has decreased β-oxidation activity, displays defects in the activation processing of PTS1-containing acyl-CoA oxidase, and missorts catalase to the cytosol (Omi et al., 2008). H. polymorpha Pln is necessary for degradation of a misfolded, peroxisome-targeted version of dihydrofolate reductase and for degradation of in vitro-synthesized alcohol oxidase in peroxisomal matrix extracts, but does not contribute to degradation of peroxisomally targeted GFP (Aksam et al., 2007).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Diagram of LON2 protein domains, gene models for LON2, PXM16, DEG15, PED1, PEX5, and PEX6, and phylogenetic relationships of LON family members. A, Organization of the 888-amino acid LON2 protein. Locations of the N-terminal domain conserved among Lon proteins, predicted ATP-binding Walker A and B domains (black circles), active site Ser (S) and Lys (K) residues (asterisks), and the C-terminal Ser-Lys-Leu (SKL) peroxisomal targeting signal (PTS1) are shown (Lee and Suzuki, 2008). B, Gene models for LON2, PXM16, DEG15, PED1, PEX5, and PEX6 and locations of T-DNA insertions (triangles) or missense alleles (arrows) used in this study. Exons are depicted by black boxes, introns by black lines, and untranslated regions by gray lines. C, Phylogenetic relationships among LON homologs. Sequences were aligned using MegAlign (DNAStar) and the ClustalW method. The PAUP 4.0b10 program (Swofford, 2001) was used to generate an unrooted phylogram from a trimmed alignment corresponding to Arabidopsis LON2 residues 400 to 888 (from the beginning of the ATPase domain to the end of the protein). The bootstrap method was performed for 500 replicates with distance as the optimality criterion. Bootstrap values are indicated at the nodes. Predicted peroxisomal proteins have C-terminal PTS1 signals in parentheses and are in light-gray ovals. Proteins in the darker gray oval have N-terminal extensions and include mitochondrial and chloroplastic proteins. Sequence identifiers are listed in Supplemental Table S2.In this work, we examined the roles of several putative peroxisomal proteases in Arabidopsis. We found that lon2 mutants displayed peroxisome-deficient phenotypes, including resistance to the protoauxin indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) and age-dependent defects in peroxisomal import of PTS1- and PTS2-targeted matrix proteins. Our results indicate that LON2 contributes to matrix protein import into Arabidopsis peroxisomes. 相似文献
Table I.
Putative Arabidopsis proteases predicted or demonstrated to be peroxisomalAGI Identifier | Alias | Protein Class | T-DNA Insertion Alleles | PTS | Localization Evidence | Localization References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
At1g28320 | DEG15 | PTS2-processing protease | SALK_007184 (deg15-1) | SKL>a | GFP | Reumann et al., 2004; Helm et al., 2007; Eubel et al., 2008; Schuhmann et al., 2008) |
Proteomics | ||||||
Bioinformatics | ||||||
At2g41790 | PXM16 | Peptidase M16 family protein | SALK_019128 (pxm16-1) | PKL>b | Proteomics | Reumann et al., 2004, 2009; Eubel et al., 2008) |
SALK_023917 (pxm16-2) | Bioinformatics | |||||
At5g47040 | LON2 | Lon protease homolog | SALK_128438 (lon2-1) | SKL>a | GFP | Reumann et al., 2004, 2009; Ostersetzer et al., 2007; Eubel et al., 2008) |
SALK_043857 (lon2-2) | Proteomics | |||||
Bioinformatics | ||||||
At2g18080 | Ser-type peptidase | SALK_020628 | SSI>c | Bioinformatics | (Reumann et al., 2004) | |
SALK_102239 | ||||||
At2g35615 | Aspartyl protease | SALK_090795 | ANL>b | Bioinformatics | (Reumann et al., 2004) | |
SALK_036333 | ||||||
At3g57810 | Ovarian tumor-like Cys protease | SKL>a | Bioinformatics | (Reumann et al., 2004) | ||
At4g14570 | Acylaminoacyl-peptidase protein | CKL>b | Bioinformatics (peroxisome) | (Reumann et al., 2004; Shimaoka et al., 2004) | ||
Proteomics (vacuole) | ||||||
At4g20310 | Peptidase M50 family protein | RMx5HLd | Bioinformatics | (Reumann et al., 2004) | ||
At4g36195 | Ser carboxypeptidase S28 family | SSM>b | Bioinformatics (peroxisome) | (Carter et al., 2004; Reumann et al., 2004) | ||
Proteomics (vacuole) |
3.
Crystal H Johnson Brianna L Skinner Sharon M Dietz David Blaney Robyn M Engel George W Lathrop Alex R Hoffmaster Jay E Gee Mindy G Elrod Nathaniel Powell Henry Walke 《Comparative medicine》2013,63(6):528-535
Identification of the select agent Burkholderia pseudomallei in macaques imported into the United States is rare. A purpose-bred, 4.5-y-old pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina) imported from Southeast Asia was received from a commercial vendor at our facility in March 2012. After the initial acclimation period of 5 to 7 d, physical examination of the macaque revealed a subcutaneous abscess that surrounded the right stifle joint. The wound was treated and resolved over 3 mo. In August 2012, 2 mo after the stifle joint wound resolved, the macaque exhibited neurologic clinical signs. Postmortem microbiologic analysis revealed that the macaque was infected with B. pseudomallei. This case report describes the clinical evaluation of a B. pseudomallei-infected macaque, management and care of the potentially exposed colony of animals, and protocols established for the animal care staff that worked with the infected macaque and potentially exposed colony. This article also provides relevant information on addressing matters related to regulatory issues and risk management of potentially exposed animals and animal care staff.Abbreviations: CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; IHA, indirect hemagglutination assay; PEP, postexposure prophylacticBurkholderia pseudomallei, formerly known as Pseudomonas pseudomallei, is a gram-negative, aerobic, bipolar, motile, rod-shaped bacterium. B. pseudomallei infections (melioidosis) can be severe and even fatal in both humans and animals. This environmental saprophyte is endemic to Southeast Asia and northern Australia, but it has also been found in other tropical and subtropical areas of the world.7,22,32,42 The bacterium is usually found in soil and water in endemic areas and is transmitted to humans and animals primarily through percutaneous inoculation, ingestion, or inhalation of a contaminated source.8, 22,28,32,42 Human-to-human, animal-to-animal, and animal-to-human spread are rare.8,32 In December 2012, the National Select Agent Registry designated B. pseudomallei as a Tier 1 overlap select agent.39 Organisms classified as Tier 1 agents present the highest risk of deliberate misuse, with the most significant potential for mass casualties or devastating effects to the economy, critical infrastructure, or public confidence. Select agents with this status have the potential to pose a severe threat to human and animal health or safety or the ability to be used as a biologic weapon.39Melioidosis in humans can be challenging to diagnose and treat because the organism can remain latent for years and is resistant to many antibiotics.12,37,41
B. pseudomallei can survive in phagocytic cells, a phenomenon that may be associated with latent infections.19,38 The incubation period in naturally infected animals ranges from 1 d to many years, but symptoms typically appear 2 to 4 wk after exposure.13,17,35,38 Disease generally presents in 1 of 2 forms: localized infection or septicemia.22 Multiple methods are used to diagnose melioidosis, including immunofluorescence, serology, and PCR analysis, but isolation of the bacteria from blood, urine, sputum, throat swabs, abscesses, skin, or tissue lesions remains the ‘gold standard.’9,22,40,42 The prognosis varies based on presentation, time to diagnosis, initiation of appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and underlying comorbidities.7,28,42 Currently, there is no licensed vaccine to prevent melioidosis.There are several published reports of naturally occurring melioidosis in a variety of nonhuman primates (NHP; 2,10,13,17,25,30,31,35 The first reported case of melioidosis in monkeys was recorded in 1932, and the first published case in a macaque species was in 1966.30 In the United States, there have only been 7 documented cases of NHP with B. pseudomallei infection.2,13,17 All of these cases occurred prior to the classification of B. pseudomallei as a select agent. Clinical signs in NHP range from subclinical or subacute illness to acute septicemia, localized infection, and chronic infection. NHP with melioidosis can be asymptomatic or exhibit clinical signs such as anorexia, wasting, purulent drainage, subcutaneous abscesses, and other soft tissue lesions. Lymphadenitis, lameness, osteomyelitis, paralysis and other CNS signs have also been reported.2,7,10,22,28,32 In comparison, human''s clinical signs range from abscesses, skin ulceration, fever, headache, joint pain, and muscle tenderness to abdominal pain, anorexia, respiratory distress, seizures, and septicemia.7,9,21,22
Open in a separate windowaCountry reflects the location where the animal was housed at the time of diagosis.Here we describe a case of melioidosis diagnosed in a pigtail macaque (Macaca nemestrina) imported into the United States from Indonesia and the implications of the detection of a select agent identified in a laboratory research colony. We also discuss the management and care of the exposed colony, zoonotic concerns regarding the animal care staff that worked with the shipment of macaques, effects on research studies, and the procedures involved in reporting a select agent incident. 相似文献
Table 1.
Summary of reported cases of naturally occurring Burkholderia pseudomalleiinfections in nonhuman primatesCountrya | Imported from | Date reported | Species | Reference |
Australia | Borneo | 1963 | Pongo sp. | 36 |
Brunei | Unknown | 1982 | Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) | 33 |
France | 1976 | Hamlyn monkey (Cercopithecus hamlyni) Patas monkey (Erythrocebus patas) | 11 | |
Great Britain | Philippines and Indonesia | 1992 | Cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) | 10 |
38 | ||||
Malaysia | Unknown | 1966 | Macaca spp. | 30 |
Unknown | 1968 | Spider monkey (Brachytelis arachnoides) Lar gibbon (Hylobates lar) | 20 | |
Unknown | 1969 | Pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) | 35 | |
Unknown | 1984 | Banded leaf monkey (Presbytis melalophos) | 25 | |
Singapore | Unknown | 1995 | Gorillas, gibbon, mandrill, chimpanzee | 43 |
Thailand | Unknown | 2012 | Monkey | 19 |
United States | Thailand | 1970 | Stump-tailed macaque (Macaca arctoides) | 17 |
India | Pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) | |||
Africa | Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) | |||
Unknown | 1971 | Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) | 3 | |
Malaysia | 1981 | Pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) | 2 | |
Wild-caught, unknown | 1986 | Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) | 13 | |
Indonesia | 2013 | Pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) | Current article |
4.
Epistatic Interactions between Opaque2 Transcriptional Activator and Its Target Gene CyPPDK1 Control Kernel Trait Variation in Maize 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《Plant physiology》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
Domenica Manicacci Letizia Camus-Kulandaivelu Marie Fourmann Chantal Arar Stéphanie Barrault Agnès Rousselet No?l Feminias Luciano Consoli Lisa Francès Valérie Méchin Alain Murigneux Jean-Louis Prioul Alain Charcosset Catherine Damerval 《Plant physiology》2009,150(1):506-520
5.
Retrograde Intraflagellar Transport Mutants Identify Complex A Proteins With Multiple Genetic Interactions in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《Genetics》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
The intraflagellar transport machinery is required for the assembly of cilia. It has been investigated by biochemical, genetic, and computational methods that have identified at least 21 proteins that assemble into two subcomplexes. It has been hypothesized that complex A is required for retrograde transport. Temperature-sensitive mutations in FLA15 and FLA17 show defects in retrograde intraflagellar transport (IFT) in Chlamydomonas. We show that IFT144 and IFT139, two complex A proteins, are encoded by FLA15 and FLA17, respectively. The fla15 allele is a missense mutation in a conserved cysteine and the fla17 allele is an in-frame deletion of three exons. The flagellar assembly defect of each mutant is rescued by the respective transgenes. In fla15 and fla17 mutants, bulges form in the distal one-third of the flagella at the permissive temperature and this phenotype is also rescued by the transgenes. These bulges contain the complex B component IFT74/72, but not α-tubulin or p28, a component of an inner dynein arm, which suggests specificity with respect to the proteins that accumulate in these bulges. IFT144 and IFT139 are likely to interact with each other and other proteins on the basis of three distinct genetic tests: (1) Double mutants display synthetic flagellar assembly defects at the permissive temperature, (2) heterozygous diploid strains exhibit second-site noncomplemention, and (3) transgenes confer two-copy suppression. Since these tests show different levels of phenotypic sensitivity, we propose they illustrate different gradations of gene interaction between complex A proteins themselves and with a complex B protein (IFT172).CILIA and flagella are microtubule-based organelles that are found on most mammalian cells. They provide motility to cells and participate in many sensory processes. Defects in or loss of cilia/flagella cause a variety of human diseases that include polycystic kidney disease, retinal degeneration, infertility, obesity, respiratory defects, left–right axis determination, and polydactyly (Fliegauf et al. 2007). Mouse mutants demonstrate that cilia are essential for viability, neural tube closure, and bone development (Eggenschwiler and Anderson 2007; Fliegauf et al. 2007). Cilia and flagella are also present in protists, algae, moss, and some fungi.The assembly and maintenance of cilia and flagella require intraflagellar transport (IFT) (Kozminski et al. 1995). IFT involves the movement of 100- to 200-nm-long protein particles from the basal body located in the cell body to the tip of the flagella using the heterotrimeric kinesin-2 (anterograde movement) (Kozminski et al. 1995) and movement back to the cell body (retrograde movement) using the cytoplasmic dynein complex (Pazour et al. 1999; Porter et al. 1999). IFT particles change their direction of movement as well as their size, speed, and frequency at the ends of the flagella as they switch from anterograde to retrograde movement (Iomini et al. 2001). Biochemical isolation of IFT particles reveals that they are composed of at least 16 proteins and that these particles can be dissociated into two complexes in vitro by changing the salt concentration (Cole et al. 1998; Piperno et al. 1998). Recent genetic and bioinformatics analysis adds at least 7 more proteins to the IFT particle (Follit et al. 2009) (Eggenschwiler and Anderson 2007).
Open in a separate window—, no mutant found to date in Chlamydomonas.A collection of temperature-sensitive mutant strains that fail to assemble flagella at the restrictive temperature of 32° was isolated in Chlamydomonas (Huang et al. 1977; Adams et al. 1982; Piperno et al. 1998; Iomini et al. 2001). Analysis of the flagella at 21° permits the measurement of the velocity and frequency of IFT particles in the mutant strains. This analysis suggested that assembly has four phases: recruitment to the basal body, anterograde movement (phases I and II), retrograde movement, and return to the cytoplasm (phases III and IV) (Iomini et al. 2001). Different mutants were classified as defective in these four phases. However, because different alleles of FLA8 were classified as defective in different phases (Iomini et al. 2001; Miller et al. 2005), we combined mutants with IFT defects into just two classes. The first group (phases I and II) includes mutant strains that show decreased anterograde velocities, a decreased ratio of anterograde to retrograde particles, and an accumulation of complex A proteins at the basal body. This group includes mutations in the FLA8 and FLA10 genes, which encode the two motor subunits of kinesin-2 (Walther et al. 1994; Miller et al. 2005), as well as mutations in three unknown genes (FLA18, FLA27, and FLA28). The second group includes mutant strains that show the reciprocal phenotype (phases III and IV); these phenotypes include decreased retrograde velocities, an increased ratio of anterograde to retrograde particles, and an accumulation of complex B proteins in the flagella. With the exception of the FLA11 gene, which encodes IFT172, a component of complex B (Pedersen et al. 2005), the gene products in this class are unknown (FLA2, FLA15, FLA16, FLA17, and FLA24). One might predict that mutations in this group would map to genes that encode complex A or retrograde motor subunits. Interestingly, IFT particles isolated from fla11, fla15, fla16, and fla17-1 flagella show depletion of complex A polypeptides (Piperno et al. 1998; Iomini et al. 2001). The inclusion of IFT172 in this class is explained by the observations that IFT172 plays a role in remodeling the IFT particles at the flagellar tip to transition from anterograde to retrograde movement (Pedersen et al. 2005). The remaining mutant strains do not show obvious defects in velocities, ratios, or accumulation at 21° and may reflect a less severe phenotype at the permissive temperature or a non-IFT role for these genes.Direct interactions occur between components of complex B. IFT81 and IFT74/72 interact to form a scaffold required for IFT complex B assembly (Lucker et al. 2005). IFT57 and IFT20 also interact with each other and kinesin-2 (Baker et al. 2003). While physical interactions are being used to define IFT particle architecture, genetic interactions among loci encoding IFT components should be instructive regarding their function as well. To probe retrograde movement and its function, we have identified the gene products encoded by two retrograde defective mutant strains. They are FLA15 and FLA17 and encode IFT144 and IFT139, respectively. The genetic interactions of these loci provide interesting clues about the assembly of the IFT particles and possible physical interactions in the IFT particles. 相似文献
TABLE 1
Proteins and gene names for the intraflagellar transport particles in Chlamydomonas, C. elegans, and mouseProtein | Motif | Chlamydomonas gene | C. elegans gene | Mouse gene | References to worm and mouse genes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Complex A | |||||
IFT144 | WD | FLA15 | |||
IFT140 | WD | — | che-11 | Qin et al. (2001) | |
IFT139 | TRP | FLA17 | dyf-2 | THM1 | Efimenko et al. (2006); Tran et al. (2008) |
IFT122 | WD | — | IFTA-1 | Blacque et al. (2006) | |
IFT121 | WD | — | daf-10 | Bell et al. (2006) | |
IFT43 | — | ||||
Complex B | |||||
IFT172 | WD | FLA11 | osm-1 | Wimple | Huangfu et al. (2003); Pedersen et al. (2005); Bell et al. (2006) |
IFT88 | TRP | IFT88 | osm-5 | Tg737/Polaris | Pazour et al. (2000); Qin et al. (2001) |
IFT81 | Coil | — | ift-81 | CDV1 | Kobayashi et al. (2007) |
IFT80 | WD | — | che-2 | Wdr56 | Fujiwara et al. (1999) |
IFT74/72 | Coil | — | ift-74 | Cmg1 | Kobayashi et al. (2007) |
IFT57/55 | Coil | — | che-13 | Hippi | Haycraft et al. (2003) |
IFT54 | Microtubule binding domain MIP-T3 | — | dyf-11 | Traf3IP1 | Kunitomo and Iino (2008); Li et al. (2008); Omori et al. (2008); Follit et al. (2009) |
IFT52 | ABC type | BLD1 | osm-6 | Ngd2 | Brazelton et al. (2001); Bell et al. (2006) |
IFT46 | IFT46 | dyf-6 | Bell et al. (2006); Hou et al. (2007) | ||
IFT27 | G protein | — | Not present | Rabl4 | |
IFT25 | Hsp20 | — | Not present | HSP16.1 | Follit et al. (2009) |
IFT22 | G protein | — | IFTA-2 | Rabl5 | Schafer et al. (2006) |
IFT20 | Coil | — | Follit et al. (2006) | ||
FAP22 | Cluamp related protein | — | dyf-3 | Cluamp1 | Murayama et al. (2005); Follit et al. (2009) |
DYF13 | — | dyf-13 | Ttc26 | Blacque et al. (2005) |
6.
7.
8.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are adult-derived multipotent stem cells that have been derived from almost every tissue. They are classically defined as spindle-shaped, plastic-adherent cells capable of adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic differentiation. This capacity for trilineage differentiation has been the foundation for research into the use of MSC to regenerate damaged tissues. Recent studies have shown that MSC interact with cells of the immune system and modulate their function. Although many of the details underlying the mechanisms by which MSC modulate the immune system have been defined for human and rodent (mouse and rat) MSC, much less is known about MSC from other veterinary species. This knowledge gap is particularly important because the clinical use of MSC in veterinary medicine is increasing and far exceeds the use of MSC in human medicine. It is crucial to determine how MSC modulate the immune system for each animal species as well as for MSC derived from any given tissue source. A comparative approach provides a unique translational opportunity to bring novel cell-based therapies to the veterinary market as well as enhance the utility of animal models for human disorders. The current review covers what is currently known about MSC and their immunomodulatory functions in veterinary species, excluding laboratory rodents.Abbreviations: AT, adipose tissue; BM, Bone marrow; CB, umbilical cord blood; CT, umbilical cord tissue; DC, dendritic cell; IDO, indoleamine 2;3-dioxygenase; MSC, mesenchymal stem cells; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factorMesenchymal stem cells (MSC, alternatively known as mesenchymal stromal cells) were first reported in the literature in 1968.39 MSC are thought to be of pericyte origin (cells that line the vasculature)21,22 and typically are isolated from highly vascular tissues. In humans and mice, MSC have been isolated from fat, placental tissues (placenta, Wharton jelly, umbilical cord, umbilical cord blood), hair follicles, tendon, synovial membrane, periodontal ligament, and every major organ (brain, spleen, liver, kidney, lung, bone marrow, muscle, thymus, pancreas, skin).23,121 For most current clinical applications, MSC are isolated from adipose tissue (AT), bone marrow (BM), umbilical cord blood (CB), and umbilical cord tissue (CT; 11,87,99 Clinical trials in human medicine focus on the use of MSC both for their antiinflammatory properties (graft-versus-host disease, irritable bowel syndrome) and their ability to aid in tissue and bone regeneration in combination with growth factors and bone scaffolds (clinicaltrials.gov).131 For tissue regeneration, the abilities of MSC to differentiate and to secrete mediators and interact with cells of the immune system likely contribute to tissue healing (Figure 1). The current review will not address the specific use of MSC for orthopedic applications and tissue regeneration, although the topic is covered widely in current literature for both human and veterinary medicine.57,62,90
Open in a separate windowOpen in a separate windowFigure 1.The dual roles of MSC: differentiation and modulation of inflammation.Long-term studies in veterinary species have shown no adverse effects with the administration of MSC in a large number of animals.9,10,53 Smaller, controlled studies on veterinary species have shown few adverse effects, such as minor localized inflammation after MSC administration in vivo.7,15,17,45,86,92,98 Private companies, educational institutions, and private veterinary clinics (including Tufts University, Cummins School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, VetStem, Celavet, Alamo Pintado Equine Medical Center, and Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital) offer MSC as a clinical treatment for veterinary species. Clinical uses include tendon and cartilage injuries, tendonitis, and osteoarthritis and, to a lesser extent, bone regeneration, spinal cord injuries, and liver disease in both large and small animals.38,41,113 Even with this broad clinical use, there have been no reports of severe adverse effects secondary to MSC administration in veterinary patients. 相似文献
Table 1.
Tissues from which MSC have been isolatedTissue source (reference no.) | |||||
Species | Fat | Bone marrow | Cord blood | Cord tissue | Other |
Cat | 134 | 83 | 56 | ||
Chicken | 63 | ||||
Cow | 138 | 12 | 108 | ||
Dog | 97 | 3, 59 | 78, 119 | 139 | Periodontal ligament65 |
Goat | 66 | 96 | 4 | ||
Horse | 26, 130 | 37, 40, 123 | 67 | 130 | Periodontal ligament and gingiva88 |
Nonhuman primate | 28, 54 | 5 | |||
Pig | 135 | 114 | 70 | 14, 20, 91 | |
Rabbit | 128 | 80 | 32 | Fetal liver93 | |
Sheep | 84 | 95 | 42, 55 |
9.
10.
Vincent W. Keng Barbara J. Ryan Kirk J. Wangensteen Darius Balciunas Christian Schmedt Stephen C. Ekker David A. Largaespada 《Genetics》2009,183(4):1565-1573
Insertional mutagenesis screens play an integral part in the annotating of functional data for all sequenced genes in the postgenomic era. Chemical mutagenesis screens are highly efficient but identifying the causative gene can be a laborious task. Other mutagenesis platforms, such as transposable elements, have been successfully applied for insertional mutagenesis screens in both the mouse and rat. However, relatively low transposition efficiency has hampered their use as a high-throughput forward genetic mutagenesis screen. Here we report the first evidence of germline activity in the mouse using a naturally active DNA transposon derived from the medaka fish called Tol2, as an alternative system for high-throughput forward genetic mutagenesis screening tool.THE Tol2 (transposable element of Oryzias latipes, number 2) element belongs to the hAT family (hobo of Drosophilia, Activator of maize and Tam3 of snapdragon) of transposons and was the first known autonomously active vertebrate type II transposable element (Koga et al. 1996; Kawakami et al. 1998). Unlike other DNA-type transposons like Sleeping Beauty (SB) (Ivics et al. 1997) or piggyBac (PB) (Fraser et al. 1996), Tol2 does not exhibit any known strong site specificity for integration nor does it exhibit any significant overexpression inhibition activity (Kawakami and Noda 2004; Balciunas et al. 2006) as seen in SB (Geurts et al. 2003). Recently, Tol2 was shown to effectively carry large DNA cargo of up to 10 kb in human and mouse cells without affecting its transposition efficiency (Balciunas et al. 2006). To date, Tol2 has also been demonstrated to transpose efficiently in zebrafish, frog, chicken, mouse cells, and human cells (Kawakami et al. 2000, 2004; Koga et al. 2003; Kawakami and Noda 2004; Balciunas et al. 2006; Hamlet et al. 2006; Sato et al. 2007).Germline mutagenesis using the SB transposon system has been demonstrated in both the mouse (Dupuy et al. 2001; Horie et al. 2001) and rat (Kitada et al. 2007; Lu et al. 2007). In addition, PB germline mutagenesis in mice has also been demonstrated (Ding et al. 2005; Wu et al. 2007). However, the relatively low germline transposition efficiency of both transposon systems reported so far has hampered their use in a high-throughput forward genetic mutagenesis screen (Keng et al. 2005; Kitada et al. 2007).
Open in a separate windowSB, Sleeping Beauty; PB, piggyBac; Tol2, transposable element of Oryzias latipes, number 2.In search of an alternative tool for high-throughput forward germline mutagenesis screen in mice, a Tol2 transposon insertional mutagenesis system was generated on the basis of a similar strategy used for the SB transposon system (Horie et al. 2003; Keng et al. 2005). In the present study, we successfully demonstrate the novel use of the Tol2 transposon system for germline mutagenesis in mouse. Our results indicate the potential use of this transposon system for a high-throughput, large-scale forward mutagenesis screen in the mouse germline. 相似文献
TABLE 1
Germline transposition frequency in various transposon systemsTransposon system | Average transposition events per gamete | Mouse strain | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
SB | 2 | FVB/N | Dupuy et al. (2001) |
SB | 1.25 | C3H and C57BL/6 | Horie et al. (2001) |
SB | 1.15 | C3H and C57BL/6 | Keng et al. (2005) |
PB | 1.1 | FVB/N | Ding et al. (2005) |
PB | 1 | C57BL/6 | Wu et al. (2007) |
Tol2 | 3 | FVB/N | Present study |
11.
12.
Yanbin Yin Huiling Chen Michael G. Hahn Debra Mohnen Ying Xu 《Plant physiology》2010,153(4):1729-1746
Carbohydrate-active enzyme glycosyltransferase family 8 (GT8) includes the plant galacturonosyltransferase1-related gene family of proven and putative α-galacturonosyltransferase (GAUT) and GAUT-like (GATL) genes. We computationally identified and investigated this family in 15 fully sequenced plant and green algal genomes and in the National Center for Biotechnology Information nonredundant protein database to determine the phylogenetic relatedness of the GAUTs and GATLs to other GT8 family members. The GT8 proteins fall into three well-delineated major classes. In addition to GAUTs and GATLs, known or predicted to be involved in plant cell wall biosynthesis, class I also includes a lower plant-specific GAUT and GATL-related (GATR) subfamily, two metazoan subfamilies, and proteins from other eukaryotes and cyanobacteria. Class II includes galactinol synthases and plant glycogenin-like starch initiation proteins that are not known to be directly involved in cell wall synthesis, as well as proteins from fungi, metazoans, viruses, and bacteria. Class III consists almost entirely of bacterial proteins that are lipooligo/polysaccharide α-galactosyltransferases and α-glucosyltransferases. Sequence motifs conserved across all GT8 subfamilies and those specific to plant cell wall-related GT8 subfamilies were identified and mapped onto a predicted GAUT1 protein structure. The tertiary structure prediction identified sequence motifs likely to represent key amino acids involved in catalysis, substrate binding, protein-protein interactions, and structural elements required for GAUT1 function. The results show that the GAUTs, GATLs, and GATRs have a different evolutionary origin than other plant GT8 genes, were likely acquired from an ancient cyanobacterium (Synechococcus) progenitor, and separate into unique subclades that may indicate functional specialization.Plant cell walls are composed of three principal types of polysaccharides: cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin. Studying the biosynthesis and degradation of these biopolymers is important because cell walls have multiple roles in plants, including providing structural support to cells and defense against pathogens, serving as cell-specific developmental and differentiation markers, and mediating or facilitating cell-cell communication. In addition to their important roles within plants, cell walls also have many economic uses in human and animal nutrition and as sources of natural textile fibers, paper and wood products, and components of fine chemicals and medicinal products. The study of the biosynthesis and biodegradation of plant cell walls has become even more significant because cell walls are the major components of biomass (Mohnen et al., 2008), which is the most promising renewable source for the production of biofuels and biomaterials (Ragauskas et al., 2006; Pauly and Keegstra, 2008). Analyses of fully sequenced plant genomes have revealed that they encode hundreds or even thousands of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy; Henrissat et al., 2001; Yokoyama and Nishitani, 2004; Geisler-Lee et al., 2006). Most of these CAZy enzymes (Cantarel et al., 2009) are glycosyltransferases (GTs) or glycoside hydrolases, which are key players in plant cell wall biosynthesis and modification (Cosgrove, 2005).The CAZy database is classified into 290 protein families (www.cazy.org; release of September 2008), of which 92 are GT families (Cantarel et al., 2009). A number of the GT families have been previously characterized to be involved in plant cell wall biosynthesis. For example, the GT2 family is known to include cellulose synthases and some hemicellulose backbone synthases (Lerouxel et al., 2006), such as mannan synthases (Dhugga et al., 2004; Liepman et al., 2005), putative xyloglucan synthases (Cocuron et al., 2007), and mixed linkage glucan synthases (Burton et al., 2006). With respect to the synthesis of xylan, a type of hemicellulose, four Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) proteins from the GT43 family, irregular xylem 9 (IRX9), IRX14, IRX9-L, and IRX14-L, and two proteins from the GT47 family, IRX10 and IRX10-L, are candidates (York and O''Neill, 2008) for glucuronoxylan backbone synthases (Brown et al., 2007, 2009; Lee et al., 2007a; Peña et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2009). In addition, three proteins have been implicated in the synthesis of an oligosaccharide thought to act either as a primer or terminator in xylan synthesis (Peña et al., 2007): two from the GT8 family (IRX8/GAUT12 [Persson et al., 2007] and PARVUS/GATL1 [Brown et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2007b]) and one from the GT47 family (FRA8/IRX7 [Zhong et al., 2005]).The GT families involved in the biosynthesis of pectins have been relatively less studied until recently. In 2006, a gene in CAZy family GT8 was shown to encode a functional homogalacturonan α-galacturonosyltransferase, GAUT1 (Sterling et al., 2006). GAUT1 belongs to a 25-member gene family in Arabidopsis, the GAUT1-related gene family, that includes two distinct but closely related families, the galacturonosyltransferase (GAUT) genes and the galacturonosyltransferase-like (GATL) genes (Sterling et al., 2006). Another GAUT gene, GAUT8/QUA1, has been suggested to be involved in pectin and/or xylan synthesis, based on the phenotypes of plant lines carrying mutations in this gene (Bouton et al., 2002; Orfila et al., 2005). It has further been suggested that multiple members of the GT8 family are galacturonosyltransferases involved in pectin and/or xylan biosynthesis (Mohnen, 2008; Caffall and Mohnen, 2009; Caffall et al., 2009).Aside from the 25 GAUT and GATL genes, Arabidopsis has 16 other family GT8 genes, according to the CAZy database, which do not seem to have the conserved sequence motifs found in GAUTs and GATLs: HxxGxxKPW and GLG (Sterling et al., 2006). Eight of these 16 genes are annotated as galactinol synthase (GolS) by The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR; www.arabidopsis.org), and three of these AtGolS enzymes have been implicated in the synthesis of raffinose family oligosaccharides that are associated with stress tolerance (Taji et al., 2002). The other eight Arabidopsis GT8 genes are annotated as plant glycogenin-like starch initiation proteins (PGSIPs) in TAIR. PGSIPs have been proposed to be involved in the synthesis of primers necessary for starch biosynthesis (Chatterjee et al., 2005). Hence, the GT8 family is a protein family consisting of enzymes with very distinct proven and proposed functions. Indeed, a suggestion has been made to split the GT8 family into two groups (Sterling et al., 2006), namely, the cell wall biosynthesis-related genes (GAUTs and GATLs) and the non-cell wall synthesis-related genes (GolSs and PGSIPs).We are interested in further defining the functions of the GAUT and GATL proteins in plants, in particular their role(s) in plant cell wall synthesis. The apparent disparate functions of the GT8 family (i.e. the GAUTs and GATLs as proven and putative plant cell wall polysaccharide biosynthetic α-galacturonosyltransferases, the eukaryotic GolSs as α-galactosyltransferases that synthesize the first step in the synthesis of the oligosaccharides stachyose and raffinose, the putative PGSIPs, and the large bacterial GT8 family of diverse α-glucosyltransferases and α-galactosyltransferases involved in lipopolysaccharide and lipooligosaccharide synthesis) indicate that the GT8 family members are involved in several unique types of glycoconjugate and glycan biosynthetic processes (Yin et al., 2010). This observation led us to ask whether any of the GT8 family members are sufficiently closely related to GAUT and GATL genes to be informative regarding GAUT or GATL biosynthetic function(s) and/or mechanism(s).To investigate the relatedness of the members of the GT8 gene family, we carried out a detailed phylogenetic analysis of the entire GT8 family in 15 completely sequenced plant and green algal genomes (Abbreviation Clade Species Genome Published Downloaded from mpc Green algae Micromonas pusilla CCMP1545 Worden et al. (2009) JGI version 2.0 mpr Green algae Micromonas strain RCC299 Worden et al. (2009) JGI version 2.0 ol Green algae Ostreococcus lucimarinus Palenik et al. (2007) JGI version 1.0 ot Green algae Ostreococcus tauri Derelle et al. (2006) JGI version 1.0 cr Green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Merchant et al. (2007) JGI version 3.0 vc Green algae Volvox carteri f. nagariensis No JGI version 1.0 pp Moss Physcomitrella patens ssp. patens Rensing et al. (2008) JGI version 1.1 sm Spike moss Selaginella moellendorffii No JGI version 1.0 pt Dicot Populus trichocarpa Tuskan et al. (2006) JGI version 1.1 at Dicot Arabidopsis thaliana Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) TAIR version 9.0 vv Dicot Vitis vinifera Jaillon et al. (2007) http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/ gm Dicot Glycine max Schmutz et al. (2010) JGI version 1.0 os Monocot Oryza sativa Goff et al. (2002); Yu et al. (2002) TIGR version 6.1 sb Monocot Sorghum bicolor Paterson et al. (2009) JGI version 1.0 bd Monocot Brachypodium distachyon Vogel et al. (2010) JGI version 1.0