Functional and Spatial Regulation of Mitotic Centromere- Associated Kinesin by Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1

Mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) plays an essential role in spindle formation and in correction of improper microtubule-kinetochore attachments. The localization and activity of MCAK at the centromere/kinetochore are controlled by Aurora B kinase. However, MCAK is also abundant in the cytosol and at centrosomes during mitosis, and its regulatory mechanism at these sites is unknown. We show here that cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) phosphorylates T537 in the core domain of MCAK and attenuates its microtubule-destabilizing activity in vitro and in vivo. Phosphorylation of MCAK by Cdk1 promotes the release of MCAK from centrosomes and is required for proper spindle formation. Interfering with the regulation of MCAK by Cdk1 causes dramatic defects in spindle formation and in chromosome positioning. This is the first study demonstrating that Cdk1 regulates the localization and activity of MCAK in mitosis by directly phosphorylating the catalytic core domain of MCAK.Chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindles, and chromosome movement is tightly linked to the structure and dynamics of spindle microtubules during mitosis. Important regulators of microtubule dynamics are the kinesin-13 proteins (37). This kinesin superfamily is defined by the localization of the conserved kinesin core motor domain in the middle of the polypeptide (19). Kinesin-13 proteins induce microtubule depolymerization by disassembling tubulin subunits from the polymer end (6). Among them, mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) is the best-characterized member of the family. It depolymerizes microtubules in vitro and in vivo, regulates microtubule dynamics, and has been implicated in correcting misaligned chromosomes (12, 14, 16, 24). In agreement with these observations, both overexpression and inhibition of MCAK result in a disruption of microtubule dynamics, leading further to improper spindle assembly and errors in chromosome alignment and segregation (7, 11, 15, 22, 33). The importance of MCAK in ensuring the faithful segregation of chromosomes is consistent with the observation that MCAK is highly expressed in several types of cancer and thus is likely to be involved in causing aneuploidy (25, 32).While MCAK is found both in the cytoplasm and at the centromeres throughout the cell cycle, it is highly enriched on centrosomes, the centromeres/kinetochores, and the spindle midzone during mitosis (18, 21, 36, 38). In accordance with its localizations, MCAK affects many aspects throughout mitosis, from spindle assembly and maintenance (3, 10, 36) to chromosome positioning and segregation (14, 21, 35). Thus, the precise control of the localization and activity of MCAK is crucial for maintaining genetic integrity during mitosis. Regulation of MCAK on the centromeres/kinetochores by Aurora B kinase in mitosis has been intensively investigated (1, 28, 29, 43). The data reveal that MCAK is phosphorylated on several serine/threonine residues by Aurora B, which inhibits the microtubule-destabilizing activity of MCAK and regulates its localization on chromosome arms/centromeres/kinetochores during mitosis (1, 18, 28). Moreover, in concert with Aurora B, ICIS (inner centromere KinI stimulator), a protein targeting the inner centromeres in an MCAK-dependent manner, may regulate MCAK at the inner centromeres and prevent kinetochore-microtubule attachment errors in mitosis by stimulating the activity of MCAK (27). Interestingly, hSgo2, a recently discovered inner centromere protein essential for centromere cohesion, has been reported to be important in localizing MCAK to the centromere and in spatially regulating its mitotic activity (13). These data highlight that the activity and localization of MCAK on the centromeres/kinetochores during mitosis are tightly controlled by Aurora B and its cofactors. Remarkably, MCAK concentrates at spindle poles from prophase to telophase during mitosis (18); however, only a few studies have been done to deal with that issue. Aurora A-depleted prometaphase cells delocalize MCAK from spindle poles but accumulate the microtubule-stabilizing protein ch-TOG at poles (5), implying that Aurora A might influence the centrosomal localization of MCAK in mitosis. Aurora A is also found to be important for focusing microtubules at aster centers and for facilitating the transition from asters to bipolar spindles in Xenopus egg extracts (42). In addition, it has been revealed that Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II gamma (CaMKII gamma) suppresses MCAK''s activity, which is essential for bipolar spindle formation in mitosis (11). More work is required to gain insight into the regulatory mechanisms of MCAK at spindle poles during mitosis.Deregulated cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are very often linked to genomic and chromosomal instability (20). Cyclin B1, the regulatory subunit of Cdk1, is localized to unattached kinetochores and contributes to efficient microtubule attachment and proper chromosome alignment (2, 4). We observed that knockdown of cyclin B1 induces defects in chromosome alignment and mitotic spindle formation (N.-N. Kreis, M. Sanhaji, A. Krämer, K. Sommor, F. Rödel, K. Strebhardt, and J. Yuan, submitted for publication). Yet, how Cdk1/cyclin B1 carries out these functions is not very well understood. In this context, it is extremely interesting to investigate the relationship between the essential mitotic kinase Cdk1 and the microtubule depolymerase MCAK in human cells.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Inactivation and Disassembly of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex during Human Cytomegalovirus Infection Is Associated with Degradation of the APC5 and APC4 Subunits and Does Not Require UL97-Mediated Phosphorylation of Cdh1

Infection of quiescent cells by human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) elicits severe cell cycle deregulation, resulting in a G₁/S arrest, which can be partly attributed to the inactivation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). As we previously reported, the premature phosphorylation of its coactivator Cdh1 and/or the dissociation of the core complex can account for the inactivation. We have expanded on these results and further delineated the key components required for disabling the APC during HCMV infection. The viral protein kinase UL97 was hypothesized to phosphorylate Cdh1, and consistent with this, phosphatase assays utilizing a virus with a UL97 deletion mutation (ΔUL97 virus) indicated that Cdh1 is hypophosphorylated at early times in the infection. Mass spectrometry analysis demonstrated that UL97 can phosphorylate Cdh1 in vitro, and the majority of the sites identified correlated with previously characterized cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) consensus sites. Analysis of the APC core complex during ΔUL97 virus infection showed APC dissociation occurring at the same time as during infection with wild-type virus, suggesting that the UL97-mediated phosphorylation of Cdh1 is not required for this to occur. Further investigation of the APC subunits showed a proteasome-dependent loss of the APC5 and APC4 subunits that was temporally associated with the disassembly of the APC. Immediate early viral gene expression was not sufficient for the degradation of APC4 and APC5, indicating that a viral early gene product(s), possibly in association with a de novo-synthesized cellular protein(s), is involved.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), a highly prevalent β-herpesvirus, can cause serious birth defects and disease in immunocompromised individuals, and it may be associated with cancer and cardiovascular disease (53). Viral gene expression is temporally regulated and is dependent on many cellular factors for a productive infection. Immediate early (IE) genes are expressed by 2 h postinfection (p.i.) and transactivate the early genes required for viral DNA replication. The expression of the late genes, which encode proteins involved in virion maturation and egress, is dependent on viral DNA replication.The virus has adopted different strategies for altering the cellular environment to make it more conducive to productive infection, including the stimulation of host cell DNA replication pathways, cell cycle deregulation and arrest, immune evasion, and inhibition of apoptosis (53). Although HCMV encodes its own DNA polymerase, it is dependent on other cellular resources for DNA replication. Infection of quiescent cells induces passage toward S phase such that the host cell is stimulated to generate proteins and DNA precursors necessary for genome replication; however, entry into S phase and cellular DNA replication are subsequently blocked and the cell arrests in G₁/S (1, 10, 11, 14, 30, 45). Cellular resources are thereby presumably free to be efficiently utilized for viral replication. Cell cycle arrest by HCMV is achieved in part through the misregulation of several cell cycle proteins, including the phosphorylation and accumulation of the Rb family pocket proteins, upregulation of cyclins E and B and their associated kinase activities, inhibition of cyclin A expression, stabilization of p53, and accumulation of Cdc6 and geminin, which inhibits licensing of the cellular origins of DNA replication (8, 17, 30, 49, 54, 65). Some of these cell cycle defects can be attributed to a deregulation of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) (8, 72, 79, 80), an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is responsible for the timely degradation of cell cycle proteins and mitotic cyclins to promote cycle progression from mitosis through G₁ to S phase (58, 74). As the APC also appears to be a common target among other viruses, including the chicken anemia virus, adenoviruses, and poxviruses (23, 36, 52, 70), understanding the mechanisms leading to its inactivation during viral infection has been of great interest.As we have previously reported, multiple mechanisms may be involved in disabling the APC during HCMV infection (72), which is not surprising given the complexity of its structure and regulation (for a review, see references 58 and 74). The APC is a large multisubunit complex consisting of at least 11 conserved core subunits, as well as other species-specific subunits. In metazoans, the APC2 and APC11 subunits form the catalytic core, and along with APC10, provide the platform for binding the E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Each of the APC3, APC8, APC6, and APC7 subunits contain multiple copies of the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motif and together make up the TPR subcomplex, which provides a platform of protein interaction surfaces for binding the coactivators (i.e., Cdh1 and Cdc20) and various substrates. These two subcomplexes are bridged by the large scaffolding subunit APC1, with the TPR subcomplex tethered to APC1 through APC4 and APC5. The binding between APC1, APC4, APC5, and APC8 is also interdependent, such that the loss of one subunit decreases the association of the other three (71).The APC is activated by either of its coactivators, Cdh1 or Cdc20, which also function in recruiting specific substrates to the APC during different phases of the cell cycle. The phosphorylation of several APC subunits at the onset of mitosis, including APC1 and the TPR subunits, by cyclin B/cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) and Plk1 allows the binding of Cdc20 and subsequent activation of the APC (APC^Cdc20) (19, 37), whereas the binding and activation of the complex by Cdh1 is inhibited through its phosphorylation by cyclin B/Cdk1 (9, 29, 38, 83). As cells pass the spindle assembly checkpoint, APC^Cdc20 ubiquitinates securin (to allow for sister chromatid separation) and cyclin B for degradation by the proteasome (42, 67). The subsequent inactivation of Cdk1 and activation of mitotic phosphatases during late anaphase relieves the inhibitory phosphorylation on Cdh1, presumably by Cdc14 (6, 38, 44), which then allows Cdh1 to bind and activate the APC (APC^Cdh1). APC^Cdh1 ubiquitinates Cdc20 and mitotic cyclins for degradation to facilitate mitotic exit and maintains their low levels, along with S-phase regulators (e.g., Cdc6, geminin, etc.), during G₁ (16, 50, 59, 63). The inactivation of APC^Cdh1 as cells enter S phase may be mediated in part through the phosphorylation of Cdh1 by cyclin A/Cdk2 (46) and Cdh1 binding to the inhibitor Emi1 (25). The inactivation of Cdh1 by phosphorylation has been shown in all organisms studied thus far (e.g., yeast, Drosophila, plants, mammals, etc.), and mutants mimicking constitutively phosphorylated Cdh1 on Cdk consensus sites can neither bind nor activate the APC in vivo or in vitro (9, 29, 38, 69, 83).During HCMV infection of fibroblasts in G₀/G₁, however, Cdh1 becomes prematurely phosphorylated in a Cdk-independent manner and no longer associates with the APC (72). This dissociation does not appear to be due to an overexpression of Emi1 (79). Cdc20 also can no longer associate with the APC (79), suggesting a defect in the APC core. We have further shown that the APC core complex disassembles during the infection, with the TPR subunits (i.e., APC3, APC7, and APC8) and APC10 localizing to the cytosol, while APC1 remains nuclear (72). Interestingly, both the phosphorylation of Cdh1 and the dissociation of the APC occur at similar times during HCMV infection. Although either of these mechanisms could render the APC inactive, it was unclear whether these processes are linked or represent independent (or redundant) pathways. The causative factor(s) in mediating these events and the question of whether such a factor(s) was of cellular or viral origin also remained unresolved.On the basis of the results of several recent studies (26, 32, 62), the viral protein kinase UL97 emerged as a likely candidate for involvement in the phosphorylation of Cdh1. Conserved among herpesviruses, UL97 functions in viral genome replication (7, 32, 81) and in nuclear egress of viral capsids (21, 39, 48). UL97 is present in the tegument of the virus particle (76) and is also expressed de novo with early kinetics (i.e., detectable by 5 h p.i. by Western blot assay), with increased expression at later times of the infection (51, 76, 77). UL97 is a serine/threonine (S/T) protein kinase (22), and recent studies have further characterized it as a Cdkl mimic, with predicted structural similarity to Cdk2 (64) and common substrates. UL97 has been shown to phosphorylate in vitro nuclear lamin A/C (21), the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II (5), the translation elongation factor 1δ (EF1δ) (33), and Rb (26, 62) on sites targeted by Cdks, and there is considerable evidence that UL97 phosphorylates lamin A/C, EF1δ, and Rb on these sites in infected cells as well (21, 26, 33, 62). Given that cyclin A/Cdk2 and cyclin B/Cdk1 complexes normally phosphorylate Cdh1, thus preventing its association with the APC, we hypothesized that UL97 phosphorylates Cdh1 during HCMV infection.In the present study, we provide further mechanistic details of the events and players involved in inactivating the APC during HCMV infection. Evidence that UL97 is the viral factor mediating the phosphorylation of Cdh1 was obtained. However, APC disassembly still occurred at similar times in ΔUL97 and wild-type virus infections, indicating that UL97-mediated phosphorylation of Cdh1 is not required for this event. The inactivation of the APC core complex is further attributed to the loss of the APC5 and APC4 subunits early during the infection. The degradation of these subunits is proteasome dependent and requires de novo synthesis of viral early or cellular proteins. While the primary mechanism of inactivation appears to be the dissociation of the complex and the targeted loss of APC5 and APC4, phosphorylation of Cdh1 may provide a small kinetic advantage and backup mechanism for disabling the APC.     

Polo-Like Kinase 1 Depletion Induces DNA Damage in Early S Prior to Caspase Activation

Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) plays several roles in mitosis, and it has been suggested to have a role in tumorigenesis. We have previously reported that Plk1 depletion results in cell death in cancer cells, whereas normal cells survive similar depletion. However, Plk1 depletion together with p53 depletion induces cell death in normal cells as well. This communication presents evidence on the sequence of events that leads to cell death in cancer cells. DNA damage is detected at the first S phase following Plk1 depletion and is more severe in Plk1-depleted p53-null cancer cells. As a consequence of Plk1 depletion using lentivirus-based small interfering RNA techniques, prereplicative complex (pre-RC) formation is disrupted at the G₁/S transition, and DNA synthesis is reduced during S phase of the first cycle after depletion. The levels of geminin, an inhibitor of DNA pre-RC, and Emi1, an inhibitor of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome, are elevated in Plk1-depleted cells. The rate of cell cycling is slower in Plk1-depleted cells than in control cells when synchronized by serum starvation. Plk1 depletion results in disrupted DNA pre-RC formation, reduced DNA synthesis, and DNA damage before cells display severe mitotic catastrophe or apoptosis. Our data suggest that Plk1 is required for cell cycle progression not only in mitosis but also for DNA synthesis, maintenance of DNA integrity, and prevention of cell death.Progression of the cell cycle is tightly regulated in eukaryotic cells by coordinated control of phosphorylation and proteolytic events. Duplication of genetic information for the next cell generation requires the precise coordination of numerous proteins (2). To ensure the accurate division of duplicated DNA, cells require condensed chromosomes, a mitotic spindle, and correct attachment of duplicated chromosomes to the spindle. Errors in DNA replication and mitosis may lead to cell death through apoptosis or result in mutations that lead to cancer (3). Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is essential for several steps in mitosis and is highly expressed in proliferating cells. Expression of Plk1 increases in S phase and peaks during M phase (8). In addition, at the G₂/M boundary, Plk1 is activated by phosphorylation and promotes mitotic entry. Its primary role in mammalian cells appears to be control of mitotic progression, particularly in the metaphase/anaphase transition, and mitotic exit (37). At the G₂/M transition, Plx1, a counterpart of Plk1 in Xenopus, activates cyclin B1/Cdk1 by phosphorylation of Cdc25C (14) or of cyclin B1 (29). During mitotic entry, Plk1 is required for recruitment of the γ-tubulin ring complex (7). Phosphorylation of Emi1 by Plk1 leads to its destruction, release of Cdc20, and activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) (10, 22, 26). Active APC/C mediates the degradation of proteins such as cyclin A, cyclin B1, securin, and geminin to promote exit from mitosis (6, 26). The multiple roles of Plk1 from the entry to and exit from mitosis indicate its importance as a regulator of these events.Recently, several reports suggest that Plk1 may play a role in other phases of the cell cycle. Plk1 interacts with prereplicative complex (pre-RC) proteins, such as Mcm2 and Orc2, in yeast two-hybrid studies (32), and coimmunoprecipitates with Mcm2 to Mcm7 and Orc2 (32, 35). Orc2, Mcm4, Mcm6, and Mcm7 proteins colocalize in the centrosome with Plk1 (25, 32). In addition, ectopic expression of Plk1-S137D arrests HeLa cells at the G₁/S boundary (12). Moreover, microinjection of in vitro-transcribed sense mRNA of Plk1 into serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells induced thymidine incorporation, whereas microinjection of antisense mRNA into growing NIH 3T3 cells that were stimulated with serum blocked thymidine incorporation (9). This observation suggests that Plk1 is required for DNA synthesis and that overexpression of Plk1 appears to be sufficient for induction of DNA synthesis. These data raise the possibility that Plk1 might have a required function in DNA replication.Depletion of Plk1 activity by microinjection of neutralizing anti-Plk1 antibody impairs centrosome maturation in HeLa cells (15). When Plk1 function is blocked by dominant-negative Plk1, several human tumor cells undergo mitotic catastrophe independent of Cdc25C (1). In Plk1-deficient human cancer cells, centrosomes do not separate to form bipolar spindles. The cells undergo prometaphase arrest and cell death caused by mitotic catastrophe (18, 33, 38). These effects are more severe in p53-deficient cancer cells. Cells codepleted for p53 and Plk1 undergo cell death as a consequence of mitotic defects (17). However, it is unclear how Plk1 depletion induces cell death or what the sequence of events is prior to cell death.Here, we provide evidence that Plk1 depletion induces DNA damage at G₁/S before cell death responses, such as caspase activation, are initiated.     

The Nek6 and Nek7 Protein Kinases Are Required for Robust Mitotic Spindle Formation and Cytokinesis

Nek6 and Nek7 are members of the NIMA-related serine/threonine kinase family. Previous work showed that they contribute to mitotic progression downstream of another NIMA-related kinase, Nek9, although the roles of these different kinases remain to be defined. Here, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the regulation and function of Nek6 and Nek7 in human cells. By generating specific antibodies, we show that both Nek6 and Nek7 are activated in mitosis and that interfering with their activity by either depletion or expression of reduced-activity mutants leads to mitotic arrest and apoptosis. Interestingly, while completely inactive mutants and small interfering RNA-mediated depletion delay cells at metaphase with fragile mitotic spindles, hypomorphic mutants or RNA interference treatment combined with a spindle assembly checkpoint inhibitor delays cells at cytokinesis. Importantly, depletion of either Nek6 or Nek7 leads to defective mitotic progression, indicating that although highly similar, they are not redundant. Indeed, while both kinases localize to spindle poles, only Nek6 obviously localizes to spindle microtubules in metaphase and anaphase and to the midbody during cytokinesis. Together, these data lead us to propose that Nek6 and Nek7 play independent roles not only in robust mitotic spindle formation but also potentially in cytokinesis.When cells divide, they must accurately segregate the duplicated genetic material between two daughter cells such that each receives a single complete set of chromosomes. This complex biomechanical feat is achieved through the action of a bipolar microtubule-based scaffold called the mitotic spindle (36). Microtubules are primarily nucleated by centrosomes that sit at the spindle poles (37). However, microtubule nucleation also occurs in the vicinity of the chromosomes and within the spindle itself (12, 13). These activities combine to ensure the efficient capture of sister chromatids as well as the maintenance of a robust structure capable of resisting the considerable forces required for chromosome separation.Spindle assembly is regulated in large part by reversible phosphorylation, and a number of protein kinases are activated during mitosis, localize to specific regions of the spindle, and phosphorylate spindle-associated proteins. These include the master mitotic regulator Cdk1/cyclin B, the polo-like kinase Plk1, and the Aurora family kinases Aurora A and B (25). More recently, members of the NIMA-related kinase family have also been implicated in mitotic spindle regulation (27, 29). NIMA was first identified in Aspergillus nidulans as a kinase required for mitotic entry, possibly through triggering the relocation of Cdk1/cyclin B to the nucleus (6, 38). NIMA can also phosphorylate S10 of histone H3 to promote chromatin condensation (7). The fission yeast NIMA-related kinase Fin1 contributes to multiple steps in mitotic progression, including the timing of mitotic entry, spindle formation, and mitotic exit (14, 15). However, the detailed mechanisms by which these fungal kinases contribute to mitotic regulation remain far from understood.In mammals, there are 11 NIMA-related kinases, named Nek1 to Nek11, and of these, 4 have been directly implicated in mitotic regulation, as follows: Nek2, Nek6, Nek7, and Nek9 (also known as Nercc1) (26, 27, 29). Nek2 is the most closely related mammalian kinase to NIMA and Fin1 by sequence and has been studied in the most detail. It localizes to the centrosome, where it phosphorylates and thereby regulates the association of a number of large coiled-coil proteins implicated in centrosome cohesion and microtubule anchoring (1, 10, 11, 21, 22, 30). These activities facilitate the early stages of spindle assembly at the G₂/M transition. Interestingly, Aspergillus NIMA and fission yeast Fin1 also localize to the fungal equivalent of the centrosome, namely the spindle pole body (15, 20, 38). Here, they may participate in positive feedback loops that promote the activation of Cdk1/cyclin B and mitotic entry.Nek6, Nek7, and Nek9 act together in a mitotic kinase cascade, with Nek9 being upstream of Nek6 and Nek7. Nek9 was identified as an interacting partner of Nek6 and subsequently shown to phosphorylate Nek6 at S206 within its activation loop (2, 33). Both Nek9 and Nek6 have been reported to be activated in mitosis (2, 33, 39), although other studies dispute this (18, 23). NIMA-related kinases are characterized by having a conserved N-terminal catalytic domain, followed by a nonconserved C-terminal regulatory domain that varies in size and structure. Nek6 and Nek7 are significant exceptions to this, in that they are the smallest of the kinases and consist only of a catalytic domain with a very short N-terminal extension. They share significant similarity with each other, being 87% identical within their catalytic domains. Hence, although they exhibit distinct tissue expression patterns (8), it has generally been assumed that they are likely to have very similar properties and functions, with both being downstream substrates of Nek9.Functional studies of Nek9 reveal that it has major roles to play in the organization of the mitotic spindle. Expression of inactive and truncated Nek9 mutants led to the missegregation of chromosomes, while injection of anti-Nek9 antibodies into prophase cells caused aberrant mitotic spindle formation (33). Similarly, depletion of Nek9 from Xenopus egg extracts led to a reduction in the formation of bipolar spindles in vitro (32; J. Blot and A. M. Fry, unpublished results). The basis for these defects remains unclear, but a number of binding partners have been identified that suggest possible functions in microtubule nucleation and anchoring, including components of the γ-tubulin ring complex (γ-TuRC), the Ran GTPase, and BicD2 (18, 32, 33).While Nek9 is proposed to act upstream of Nek6 and Nek7, the proportion of its activities being channeled through these kinases is not known. Limited studies have been performed by looking at the consequences of expressing kinase-inactive Nek6 or Nek7 constructs or depleting the proteins by RNA interference (RNAi). Interference with Nek6 has been reported by one group to lead to metaphase arrest and apoptosis (39), although this is disputed by another study (23). Interference with Nek7 apparently leads to an increase in the mitotic index and apoptosis (19, 40). A decrease in centrosome-associated γ-tubulin and microtubule nucleation was also detected upon RNAi of Nek7, which is interesting in light of the interaction between Nek9 and γ-tubulin. Furthermore, defects in cytokinesis were found upon Nek7 depletion if cells were allowed to progress past the spindle checkpoint by codepletion of Mad2 (19). Importantly, both Nek9 and Nek7 localize to centrosomes, further supporting the model that this is a major site of action for this family of kinases in spindle formation (19, 32, 40).In this study, we set out to clarify the mitotic roles of Nek6 and Nek7 by examining the consequences of expression of mutants with different levels of kinase activity as well as depletion of the proteins by RNAi. Our results demonstrate that Nek6 and Nek7 are both activated in mitosis and that interference with either kinase leads to apoptosis following mitotic arrest. Interestingly, expression of inactive mutants or small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion leads to a metaphase delay with fragile mitotic spindles, whereas expression of hypomorphic mutants or depletion in the presence of a spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) inhibitor leads to an accumulation of cells in cytokinesis. Based on additional localization data, we propose that these kinases regulate microtubule organization not only at spindle poles but also within the mitotic spindle itself and possibly at the central spindle during late mitosis. This study therefore provides important novel insights into how Nek6 and Nek7 contribute to distinct molecular events in mitotic progression.     

Residues in a Highly Conserved Claudin-1 Motif Are Required for Hepatitis C Virus Entry and Mediate the Formation of Cell-Cell Contacts

Claudin-1, a component of tight junctions between liver hepatocytes, is a hepatitis C virus (HCV) late-stage entry cofactor. To investigate the structural and functional roles of various claudin-1 domains in HCV entry, we applied a mutagenesis strategy. Putative functional intracellular claudin-1 domains were not important. However, we identified seven novel residues in the first extracellular loop that are critical for entry of HCV isolates drawn from six different subtypes. Most of the critical residues belong to the highly conserved claudin motif W₃₀-GLW₅₁-C₅₄-C₆₄. Alanine substitutions of these residues did not impair claudin-1 cell surface expression or lateral protein interactions within the plasma membrane, including claudin-1-claudin-1 and claudin-1-CD81 interactions. However, these mutants no longer localized to cell-cell contacts. Based on our observations, we propose that cell-cell contacts formed by claudin-1 may generate specialized membrane domains that are amenable to HCV entry.Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major human pathogen that affects approximately 3% of the global population, leading to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in chronically infected individuals (5, 23, 42). Hepatocytes are the major target cells of HCV (11), and entry follows a complex cascade of interactions with several cellular factors (6, 8, 12, 17). Infectious viral particles are associated with lipoproteins and initially attach to target cells via glycosaminoglycans and the low-density lipoprotein receptor (1, 7, 31). These interactions are followed by direct binding of the E2 envelope glycoprotein to the scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-B1) and then to the CD81 tetraspanin (14, 15, 33, 36). Early studies showed that CD81 and SR-B1 were necessary but not sufficient for HCV entry, and claudin-1 was discovered to be a requisite HCV entry cofactor that appears to act at a very late stage of the process (18).Claudin-1 is a member of the claudin protein family that participates in the formation of tight junctions between adjacent cells (25, 30, 37). Tight junctions regulate the paracellular transport of solutes, water, and ions and also generate apical-basal cell polarity (25, 37). In the liver, the apical surfaces of hepatocytes form bile canaliculi, whereas the basolateral surfaces face the underside of the endothelial layer that lines liver sinusoids. Claudin-1 is highly expressed in tight junctions formed by liver hepatocytes as well as on all hepatoma cell lines that are permissive to HCV entry (18, 24, 28). Importantly, nonhepatic cell lines that are engineered to express claudin-1 become permissive to HCV entry (18). Claudin-6 and -9 are two other members of the human claudin family that enable HCV entry into nonpermissive cells (28, 43).The precise role of claudin-1 in HCV entry remains to be determined. A direct interaction between claudins and HCV particles or soluble E2 envelope glycoprotein has not been demonstrated (18; T. Dragic, unpublished data). It is possible that claudin-1 interacts with HCV entry receptors SR-B1 or CD81, thereby modulating their ability to bind to E2. Alternatively, claudin-1 may ferry the receptor-virus complex to fusion-permissive intracellular compartments. Recent studies show that claudin-1 colocalizes with the CD81 tetraspanin at the cell surface of permissive cell lines (22, 34, 41). With respect to nonpermissive cells, one group observed that claudin-1 was predominantly intracellular (41), whereas another reported associations of claudin-1 and CD81 at the cell surface, similar to what is observed in permissive cells (22).Claudins comprise four transmembrane domains along with two extracellular loops and two cytoplasmic domains (19, 20, 25, 30, 37). The first extracellular loop (ECL1) participates in pore formation and influences paracellular charge selectivity (25, 37). It has been shown that the ECL1 of claudin-1 is required for HCV entry (18). All human claudins comprise a highly conserved motif, W₃₀-GLW₅₁-C₅₄-C₆₄, in the crown of ECL1 (25, 37). The exact function of this domain is unknown, and we hypothesized that it is important for HCV entry. The second extracellular loop is required for the holding function and oligomerization of the protein (25). Claudin-1 also comprises various signaling domains and a PDZ binding motif in the intracellular C terminus that binds ZO-1, another major component of tight junctions (30, 32, 37). We further hypothesized that some of these domains may play a role in HCV entry.To understand the role of claudin-1 in HCV infection, we developed a mutagenesis strategy targeting the putative sites for internalization, glycosylation, palmitoylation, and phosphorylation. The functionality of these domains has been described by others (4, 16, 25, 35, 37, 40). We also mutagenized charged and bulky residues in ECL1, including all six residues within the highly conserved motif W₃₀-GLW₅₁-C₅₄-C₆₄. None of the intracellular domains were found to affect HCV entry. However, we identified seven residues in ECL1 that are critical for entry mediated by envelope glycoproteins derived from several HCV subtypes, including all six residues of the conserved motif. These mutants were still expressed at the cell surface and able to form lateral homophilic interactions within the plasma membrane as well as to engage in lateral interactions with CD81. In contrast, they no longer engaged in homophilic trans interactions at cell-cell contacts. We conclude that the highly conserved motif W₃₀-GLW₅₁-C₅₄-C₆₄ of claudin-1 is important for HCV entry into target cells and participates in the formation of cell-cell contacts.     

Cdk5-Dependent Regulation of Rho Activity,Cytoskeletal Contraction,and Epithelial Cell Migration via Suppression of Src and p190RhoGAP

Cdk5 regulates adhesion and migration in a variety of cell types. We previously showed that Cdk5 is strongly activated during stress fiber formation and contraction in spreading cells. Here we determine the mechanism linking Cdk5 to stress fiber contractility and its relevance to cell migration. Immunofluorescence showed that Cdk5 colocalized with phosphorylated myosin regulatory light chain (pMRLC) on contracting stress fibers. Inhibiting Cdk5 activity by various means significantly reduced pMRLC level and cytoskeletal contraction, with loss of central stress fibers. Blocking Cdk5 activity also reduced Rho-Rho kinase (ROCK) signaling, which is the principal pathway of myosin phosphorylation under these conditions. Next, we examined the effect of Cdk5 activity on Src, a known regulator of Rho. Inhibiting Cdk5 activity increased Src activation and phosphorylation of its substrate, p190RhoGAP, an upstream inhibitor of Rho. Inhibiting both Cdk5 and Src activity completely reversed the effect of Cdk5 inhibition on Rho and prevented the loss of central stress fibers, demonstrating that Cdk5 exerts its effects on Rho-ROCK signaling by suppressing Src activity. Moreover, inhibiting either Cdk5 or ROCK activity increased cell migration to an equal extent, while inhibiting both kinases produced no additional effect, demonstrating that Cdk5-dependent regulation of ROCK activity is a physiological determinant of migration rate.Cell migration is essential for morphogenesis during embryonic development and for epithelial homeostasis and wound healing throughout life. As myosin II is involved in all aspects of cell migration, from cell polarization and adhesion to protrusion and tail retraction (34, 48), the signaling pathways regulating myosin-dependent cytoskeletal contraction are of particular interest. Myosin contraction is regulated by phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain (MRLC) at Thr18/Ser19. Although a number of kinases have been identified which phosphorylate these sites, the principal kinases in most cells are myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), a calcium/calmodulin-regulated enzyme, and Rho kinase (ROCK), a downstream effector of the Rho family GTPase RhoA. To provide the stringent control of cytoskeletal contraction needed for migration, RhoA is subject to both positive regulation by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), such as GEF-H1 (4, 21), and negative regulation by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), such as the Src-regulated protein p190RhoGAP (1, 3, 10, 13). An additional level of regulation is provided by guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors, which bind to inactive RhoA and other Rho family GTPases, sequestering them in the cytosol (3). Two major downstream effectors of RhoA with regard to the cytoskeleton are the mammalian homologue of diaphanous, involved in actin polymerization (43), and ROCK, which phosphorylates MRLC and myosin phosphatase (20).Cdk5, a serine/threonine kinase, is an atypical member of the well-known family of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks). Unlike the other Cdks, it has no known function in cell cycle regulation and is activated by one of two noncyclin proteins, p35 or p39 (16, 41). Phosphorylation of Cdk5 at Y15 increases its activity severalfold (36, 49). Although Cdk5 is most abundant in neuronal cells, where it regulates migration, cytoskeletal dynamics, and membrane trafficking (37, 38, 45), a growing body of evidence indicates that Cdk5 has similar functions in nonneuronal cells (35). In particular, Cdk5 has been shown to strengthen cell-to-matrix adhesion and regulate migration in lens epithelial cells (28), corneal epithelial cells (11, 12, 40), keratinocytes (27), and CHO-K1 cells (15). The effects of Cdk5 on adhesion and migration have been linked, at least in part, to Cdk5-dependent phosphorylation of talin, which strengthens adhesion by slowing the rate of focal adhesion turnover (15). However, we have observed that Cdk5 not only binds to focal adhesions, where talin is located, but also to stress fibers (33). Moreover, in spreading cells, Cdk5 exerts its greatest effect on adhesion 1 to 2 h after plating (28), when stress fiber contraction is pronounced and Cdk5 activity is maximum (33). Therefore, we hypothesized that Cdk5 might regulate the MRLC phosphorylation necessary for stress fiber contraction and stability. To test this possibility, we examined the relationship of Cdk5 activity to MRLC phosphorylation and cytoskeletal contraction in spreading human lens epithelial cells.     

Investigation of Clade B New World Arenavirus Tropism by Using Chimeric GP1 Proteins

Clade B of the New World arenaviruses contains both pathogenic and nonpathogenic members, whose surface glycoproteins (GPs) are characterized by different abilities to use the human transferrin receptor type 1 (hTfR1) protein as a receptor. Using closely related pairs of pathogenic and nonpathogenic viruses, we investigated the determinants of the GP1 subunit that confer these different characteristics. We identified a central region (residues 85 to 221) in the Guanarito virus GP1 that was sufficient to interact with hTfR1, with residues 159 to 221 being essential. The recently solved structure of part of the Machupo virus GP1 suggests an explanation for these requirements.Arenaviruses are bisegmented, single-stranded RNA viruses that use an ambisense coding strategy to express four proteins: NP (nucleoprotein), Z (matrix protein), L (polymerase), and GP (glycoprotein). The viral GP is sufficient to direct entry into host cells, and retroviral vectors pseudotyped with GP recapitulate the entry pathway of these viruses (5, 13, 24, 31). GP is a class I fusion protein comprising two subunits, GP1 and GP2, cleaved from the precursor protein GPC (4, 14, 16, 18, 21). GP1 contains the receptor binding domain (19, 28), while GP2 contains structural elements characteristic of viral membrane fusion proteins (8, 18, 20, 38). The N-terminal stable signal peptide (SSP) remains associated with the mature glycoprotein after cleavage (2, 39) and plays a role in transport, maturation, and pH-dependent fusion (17, 35, 36, 37).The New World arenaviruses are divided into clades A, B, and C based on phylogenetic relatedness (7, 9, 11). Clade B contains the human pathogenic viruses Junin (JUNV), Machupo (MACV), Guanarito (GTOV), Sabia, and Chapare, which cause severe hemorrhagic fevers in South America (1, 10, 15, 26, 34). Clade B also contains the nonpathogenic viruses Amapari (AMAV), Cupixi, and Tacaribe (TCRV), although mild disease has been reported for a laboratory worker infected with TCRV (29).Studies with both viruses and GP-pseudotyped retroviral vectors have shown that the pathogenic clade B arenaviruses use the human transferrin receptor type 1 (hTfR1) to gain entry into human cells (19, 30). In contrast, GPs from nonpathogenic viruses, although capable of using TfR1 orthologs from other species (1), cannot use hTfR1 (1, 19) and instead enter human cells through as-yet-uncharacterized hTfR1-independent pathways (19). In addition, human T-cell lines serve as useful tools to distinguish these GPs, since JUNV, GTOV, and MACV pseudotyped vectors readily transduce CEM cells, while TCRV and AMAV GP vectors do not (27; also unpublished data). These properties of the GPs do not necessarily reflect a tropism of the pathogenic viruses for human T cells, since viral tropism is influenced by many factors and T cells are not a target for JUNV replication in vivo (3, 22, 25).     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.     

Virological Synapse-Mediated Spread of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 between T Cells Is Sensitive to Entry Inhibition

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can disseminate between CD4⁺ T cells via diffusion-limited cell-free viral spread or by directed cell-cell transfer using virally induced structures termed virological synapses. Although T-cell virological synapses have been well characterized, it is unclear whether this mode of viral spread is susceptible to inhibition by neutralizing antibodies and entry inhibitors. We show here that both cell-cell and cell-free viral spread are equivalently sensitive to entry inhibition. Fluorescence imaging analysis measuring virological synapse lifetimes and inhibitor time-of-addition studies implied that inhibitors can access preformed virological synapses and interfere with HIV-1 cell-cell infection. This concept was supported by electron tomography that revealed the T-cell virological synapse to be a relatively permeable structure. Virological synapse-mediated HIV-1 spread is thus efficient but is not an immune or entry inhibitor evasion mechanism, a result that is encouraging for vaccine and drug design.As with enveloped viruses from several viral families, the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) can disseminate both by fluid-phase diffusion of viral particles and by directed cell-cell transfer (39). The primary target cell for HIV-1 replication in vivo is the CD4⁺ T-cell (13), which is infectible by CCR5-tropic (R5) and CXCR4-tropic (X4) viral variants (29). R5 HIV-1 is the major transmitted viral phenotype and dominates the global pandemic, whereas X4 virus is found later in infection in ca. 50% of infected individuals, and its presence indicates a poor disease progression prognosis (23). Cell-cell HIV-1 transfer between T cells is more efficient than diffusion-limited spread (8, 16, 32, 38), although recent estimates for the differential range from approximately 1 (42) to 4 (6) orders of magnitude. Two structures have been proposed to support contact-mediated intercellular movement of HIV-1 between T cells: membrane nanotubes (33, 43) and macromolecular adhesive contacts termed virological synapses (VS) (15, 17, 33). VS appear to be the dominant structure involved in T-cell-T-cell spread (33), and both X4 (17) and R5 HIV-1 (6, 15, 42) can spread between T cells via this mechanism.VS assembly and function are dependent on HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) engaging its primary cellular receptor CD4 (2, 6, 17). This interaction recruits more CD4 and coreceptor to the site of cell-cell contact in an actin-dependent manner (17). Adhesion molecules cluster at the intercellular junction and are thought to stabilize the VS (18). In parallel, viral Env and Gag are recruited to the interface by a microtubule-dependent mechanism (19), where polarized viral budding may release virions into the synaptic space across which the target cell is infected (17). The precise mechanism by which HIV-1 subsequently enters the target T-cell cytoplasm remains unclear: by fusion directly at the plasma membrane, fusion from within an endosomal compartment, or both (4, 6, 15, 25, 34).Viruses from diverse families including herpesviruses (9), poxviruses (22) and hepatitis C virus (44) evade neutralizing antibody attack by direct cell-cell spread, since the tight junctions across which the these viruses move are antibody impermeable. It has been speculated that transfer of HIV-1 across VS may promote evasion from immune or therapeutic intervention with the inference that the junctions formed in retroviral VS may be nonpermissive to antibody entry (39). However, available evidence regarding whether neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and other entry inhibitors can inhibit HIV-1 cell-cell spread is inconsistent (25). An early analysis suggested that HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread is relatively resistant to neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (NMAb) (12). A later study agreed with this conclusion by demonstrating a lack of permissivity of HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread, measured by transfer of viral Gag, to interference with viral fusion using a gp41-specific NMAb and a peptidic fusion inhibitor (6). In contrast, another analysis reported that anti-gp41-specific NMAb interfered effectively with HIV-1 spread between T cells (26). Inhibitors of the HIV-1 surface glycoprotein (gp120)-CD4 or gp120-CXCR4 interaction reduced X4 HIV-1 VS assembly and viral transfer if applied prior to mixing of infected and receptor-expressing target cells (17, 19), but the effect of these inhibitors has not been tested on preformed VS. Thus, the field is currently unclear on whether direct T-cell-T-cell infectious HIV-1 spread is susceptible or not to antibody and entry inhibitor-mediated disruption of VS assembly, and the related question, whether the VS is permeable to viral entry inhibitors, including NAb. Addressing these questions is of central importance to understanding HIV-1 pathogenesis and informing future drug and vaccine design.Since estimates reported in the literature of the relative efficiency of direct HIV-1 T-cell-T-cell spread compared to cell-free spread vary by approximately 3 orders of magnitude (6, 38, 42), and the evidence for the activity of viral entry inhibitors on cell-cell spread is conflicting, we set out to quantify the efficiency of infection across the T-cell VS and analyze the susceptibility of this structure to NAb and viral entry inhibitors. Assays reporting on events proximal to productive infection show that the R5 HIV-1 T-cell VS is approximately 1 order of magnitude more efficient than cell-free virus infection, and imaging analyses reveal that the VS assembled by HIV-1 is most likely permeable to inhibitors both during, and subsequent to, VS assembly. Thus, we conclude that the T-cell VS does not provide a privileged environment allowing HIV-1 escape from entry inhibition.