Functional and Spatial Regulation of Mitotic Centromere- Associated Kinesin by Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1

Mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) plays an essential role in spindle formation and in correction of improper microtubule-kinetochore attachments. The localization and activity of MCAK at the centromere/kinetochore are controlled by Aurora B kinase. However, MCAK is also abundant in the cytosol and at centrosomes during mitosis, and its regulatory mechanism at these sites is unknown. We show here that cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) phosphorylates T537 in the core domain of MCAK and attenuates its microtubule-destabilizing activity in vitro and in vivo. Phosphorylation of MCAK by Cdk1 promotes the release of MCAK from centrosomes and is required for proper spindle formation. Interfering with the regulation of MCAK by Cdk1 causes dramatic defects in spindle formation and in chromosome positioning. This is the first study demonstrating that Cdk1 regulates the localization and activity of MCAK in mitosis by directly phosphorylating the catalytic core domain of MCAK.Chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindles, and chromosome movement is tightly linked to the structure and dynamics of spindle microtubules during mitosis. Important regulators of microtubule dynamics are the kinesin-13 proteins (37). This kinesin superfamily is defined by the localization of the conserved kinesin core motor domain in the middle of the polypeptide (19). Kinesin-13 proteins induce microtubule depolymerization by disassembling tubulin subunits from the polymer end (6). Among them, mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) is the best-characterized member of the family. It depolymerizes microtubules in vitro and in vivo, regulates microtubule dynamics, and has been implicated in correcting misaligned chromosomes (12, 14, 16, 24). In agreement with these observations, both overexpression and inhibition of MCAK result in a disruption of microtubule dynamics, leading further to improper spindle assembly and errors in chromosome alignment and segregation (7, 11, 15, 22, 33). The importance of MCAK in ensuring the faithful segregation of chromosomes is consistent with the observation that MCAK is highly expressed in several types of cancer and thus is likely to be involved in causing aneuploidy (25, 32).While MCAK is found both in the cytoplasm and at the centromeres throughout the cell cycle, it is highly enriched on centrosomes, the centromeres/kinetochores, and the spindle midzone during mitosis (18, 21, 36, 38). In accordance with its localizations, MCAK affects many aspects throughout mitosis, from spindle assembly and maintenance (3, 10, 36) to chromosome positioning and segregation (14, 21, 35). Thus, the precise control of the localization and activity of MCAK is crucial for maintaining genetic integrity during mitosis. Regulation of MCAK on the centromeres/kinetochores by Aurora B kinase in mitosis has been intensively investigated (1, 28, 29, 43). The data reveal that MCAK is phosphorylated on several serine/threonine residues by Aurora B, which inhibits the microtubule-destabilizing activity of MCAK and regulates its localization on chromosome arms/centromeres/kinetochores during mitosis (1, 18, 28). Moreover, in concert with Aurora B, ICIS (inner centromere KinI stimulator), a protein targeting the inner centromeres in an MCAK-dependent manner, may regulate MCAK at the inner centromeres and prevent kinetochore-microtubule attachment errors in mitosis by stimulating the activity of MCAK (27). Interestingly, hSgo2, a recently discovered inner centromere protein essential for centromere cohesion, has been reported to be important in localizing MCAK to the centromere and in spatially regulating its mitotic activity (13). These data highlight that the activity and localization of MCAK on the centromeres/kinetochores during mitosis are tightly controlled by Aurora B and its cofactors. Remarkably, MCAK concentrates at spindle poles from prophase to telophase during mitosis (18); however, only a few studies have been done to deal with that issue. Aurora A-depleted prometaphase cells delocalize MCAK from spindle poles but accumulate the microtubule-stabilizing protein ch-TOG at poles (5), implying that Aurora A might influence the centrosomal localization of MCAK in mitosis. Aurora A is also found to be important for focusing microtubules at aster centers and for facilitating the transition from asters to bipolar spindles in Xenopus egg extracts (42). In addition, it has been revealed that Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II gamma (CaMKII gamma) suppresses MCAK''s activity, which is essential for bipolar spindle formation in mitosis (11). More work is required to gain insight into the regulatory mechanisms of MCAK at spindle poles during mitosis.Deregulated cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are very often linked to genomic and chromosomal instability (20). Cyclin B1, the regulatory subunit of Cdk1, is localized to unattached kinetochores and contributes to efficient microtubule attachment and proper chromosome alignment (2, 4). We observed that knockdown of cyclin B1 induces defects in chromosome alignment and mitotic spindle formation (N.-N. Kreis, M. Sanhaji, A. Krämer, K. Sommor, F. Rödel, K. Strebhardt, and J. Yuan, submitted for publication). Yet, how Cdk1/cyclin B1 carries out these functions is not very well understood. In this context, it is extremely interesting to investigate the relationship between the essential mitotic kinase Cdk1 and the microtubule depolymerase MCAK in human cells.     

The Nek6 and Nek7 Protein Kinases Are Required for Robust Mitotic Spindle Formation and Cytokinesis

Nek6 and Nek7 are members of the NIMA-related serine/threonine kinase family. Previous work showed that they contribute to mitotic progression downstream of another NIMA-related kinase, Nek9, although the roles of these different kinases remain to be defined. Here, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the regulation and function of Nek6 and Nek7 in human cells. By generating specific antibodies, we show that both Nek6 and Nek7 are activated in mitosis and that interfering with their activity by either depletion or expression of reduced-activity mutants leads to mitotic arrest and apoptosis. Interestingly, while completely inactive mutants and small interfering RNA-mediated depletion delay cells at metaphase with fragile mitotic spindles, hypomorphic mutants or RNA interference treatment combined with a spindle assembly checkpoint inhibitor delays cells at cytokinesis. Importantly, depletion of either Nek6 or Nek7 leads to defective mitotic progression, indicating that although highly similar, they are not redundant. Indeed, while both kinases localize to spindle poles, only Nek6 obviously localizes to spindle microtubules in metaphase and anaphase and to the midbody during cytokinesis. Together, these data lead us to propose that Nek6 and Nek7 play independent roles not only in robust mitotic spindle formation but also potentially in cytokinesis.When cells divide, they must accurately segregate the duplicated genetic material between two daughter cells such that each receives a single complete set of chromosomes. This complex biomechanical feat is achieved through the action of a bipolar microtubule-based scaffold called the mitotic spindle (36). Microtubules are primarily nucleated by centrosomes that sit at the spindle poles (37). However, microtubule nucleation also occurs in the vicinity of the chromosomes and within the spindle itself (12, 13). These activities combine to ensure the efficient capture of sister chromatids as well as the maintenance of a robust structure capable of resisting the considerable forces required for chromosome separation.Spindle assembly is regulated in large part by reversible phosphorylation, and a number of protein kinases are activated during mitosis, localize to specific regions of the spindle, and phosphorylate spindle-associated proteins. These include the master mitotic regulator Cdk1/cyclin B, the polo-like kinase Plk1, and the Aurora family kinases Aurora A and B (25). More recently, members of the NIMA-related kinase family have also been implicated in mitotic spindle regulation (27, 29). NIMA was first identified in Aspergillus nidulans as a kinase required for mitotic entry, possibly through triggering the relocation of Cdk1/cyclin B to the nucleus (6, 38). NIMA can also phosphorylate S10 of histone H3 to promote chromatin condensation (7). The fission yeast NIMA-related kinase Fin1 contributes to multiple steps in mitotic progression, including the timing of mitotic entry, spindle formation, and mitotic exit (14, 15). However, the detailed mechanisms by which these fungal kinases contribute to mitotic regulation remain far from understood.In mammals, there are 11 NIMA-related kinases, named Nek1 to Nek11, and of these, 4 have been directly implicated in mitotic regulation, as follows: Nek2, Nek6, Nek7, and Nek9 (also known as Nercc1) (26, 27, 29). Nek2 is the most closely related mammalian kinase to NIMA and Fin1 by sequence and has been studied in the most detail. It localizes to the centrosome, where it phosphorylates and thereby regulates the association of a number of large coiled-coil proteins implicated in centrosome cohesion and microtubule anchoring (1, 10, 11, 21, 22, 30). These activities facilitate the early stages of spindle assembly at the G₂/M transition. Interestingly, Aspergillus NIMA and fission yeast Fin1 also localize to the fungal equivalent of the centrosome, namely the spindle pole body (15, 20, 38). Here, they may participate in positive feedback loops that promote the activation of Cdk1/cyclin B and mitotic entry.Nek6, Nek7, and Nek9 act together in a mitotic kinase cascade, with Nek9 being upstream of Nek6 and Nek7. Nek9 was identified as an interacting partner of Nek6 and subsequently shown to phosphorylate Nek6 at S206 within its activation loop (2, 33). Both Nek9 and Nek6 have been reported to be activated in mitosis (2, 33, 39), although other studies dispute this (18, 23). NIMA-related kinases are characterized by having a conserved N-terminal catalytic domain, followed by a nonconserved C-terminal regulatory domain that varies in size and structure. Nek6 and Nek7 are significant exceptions to this, in that they are the smallest of the kinases and consist only of a catalytic domain with a very short N-terminal extension. They share significant similarity with each other, being 87% identical within their catalytic domains. Hence, although they exhibit distinct tissue expression patterns (8), it has generally been assumed that they are likely to have very similar properties and functions, with both being downstream substrates of Nek9.Functional studies of Nek9 reveal that it has major roles to play in the organization of the mitotic spindle. Expression of inactive and truncated Nek9 mutants led to the missegregation of chromosomes, while injection of anti-Nek9 antibodies into prophase cells caused aberrant mitotic spindle formation (33). Similarly, depletion of Nek9 from Xenopus egg extracts led to a reduction in the formation of bipolar spindles in vitro (32; J. Blot and A. M. Fry, unpublished results). The basis for these defects remains unclear, but a number of binding partners have been identified that suggest possible functions in microtubule nucleation and anchoring, including components of the γ-tubulin ring complex (γ-TuRC), the Ran GTPase, and BicD2 (18, 32, 33).While Nek9 is proposed to act upstream of Nek6 and Nek7, the proportion of its activities being channeled through these kinases is not known. Limited studies have been performed by looking at the consequences of expressing kinase-inactive Nek6 or Nek7 constructs or depleting the proteins by RNA interference (RNAi). Interference with Nek6 has been reported by one group to lead to metaphase arrest and apoptosis (39), although this is disputed by another study (23). Interference with Nek7 apparently leads to an increase in the mitotic index and apoptosis (19, 40). A decrease in centrosome-associated γ-tubulin and microtubule nucleation was also detected upon RNAi of Nek7, which is interesting in light of the interaction between Nek9 and γ-tubulin. Furthermore, defects in cytokinesis were found upon Nek7 depletion if cells were allowed to progress past the spindle checkpoint by codepletion of Mad2 (19). Importantly, both Nek9 and Nek7 localize to centrosomes, further supporting the model that this is a major site of action for this family of kinases in spindle formation (19, 32, 40).In this study, we set out to clarify the mitotic roles of Nek6 and Nek7 by examining the consequences of expression of mutants with different levels of kinase activity as well as depletion of the proteins by RNAi. Our results demonstrate that Nek6 and Nek7 are both activated in mitosis and that interference with either kinase leads to apoptosis following mitotic arrest. Interestingly, expression of inactive mutants or small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated depletion leads to a metaphase delay with fragile mitotic spindles, whereas expression of hypomorphic mutants or depletion in the presence of a spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) inhibitor leads to an accumulation of cells in cytokinesis. Based on additional localization data, we propose that these kinases regulate microtubule organization not only at spindle poles but also within the mitotic spindle itself and possibly at the central spindle during late mitosis. This study therefore provides important novel insights into how Nek6 and Nek7 contribute to distinct molecular events in mitotic progression.     

Multiple Anaphase-promoting Complex/Cyclosome Degrons Mediate the Degradation of Human Sgo1

Shugoshin 1 (Sgo1) protects centromeric sister-chromatid cohesion in early mitosis and, thus, prevents premature sister-chromatid separation. The protein level of Sgo1 is regulated during the cell cycle; it peaks in mitosis and is down-regulated in G₁/S. Here we show that Sgo1 is degraded during the exit from mitosis, and its degradation depends on the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). Overexpression of Cdh1 reduces the protein levels of ectopically expressed Sgo1 in human cells. Sgo1 is ubiquitinated by APC/C bound to Cdh1 (APC/C^Cdh1) in vitro. We have further identified two functional degradation motifs in Sgo1; that is, a KEN (Lys-Glu-Asn) box and a destruction box (D box). Although removal of either motif is not sufficient to stabilize Sgo1, Sgo1 with both KEN box and D box deleted is stable in cells. Surprisingly, mitosis progresses normally in the presence of non-degradable Sgo1, indicating that degradation of Sgo1 is not required for sister-chromatid separation or mitotic exit. Finally, we show that the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1 contributes to the maintenance of Sgo1 steady-state protein levels in an APC/C-independent mechanism.Loss of sister-chromatid cohesion triggers chromosome segregation in mitosis and occurs in two steps in vertebrate cells (1-3). In prophase, cohesin is phosphorylated by mitotic kinases including Plk1 and removed from chromosome arms (1, 4). Then, cleavage of centromeric cohesin by separase takes place at the metaphase-to-anaphase transition to allow sister-chromatid separation (5). The shugoshin (Sgo) family of proteins plays an important role in the protection of centromeric cohesion (6, 7). Human cells depleted of Sgo1 by RNAi undergo massive chromosome missegregation (8-11). In cells with compromised Sgo1 function, centromeric cohesin is improperly phosphorylated and removed (4, 11), resulting in premature sister-chromatid separation. It has been shown recently that Sgo1 collaborates with PP2A to counteract the action of Plk1 and other mitotic kinases and to protect centromeric cohesin from premature removal (12-14). In addition, Sgo1 has also been shown to promote stable kinetochore-microtubule attachment and sense tension across sister kinetochores (8, 15). Thus, Sgo1 is crucial for mitotic progression and chromosome segregation.Orderly progression through mitosis is regulated by the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C),² a large multiprotein ubiquitin ligase that targets key mitotic regulators for destruction by the proteasome (16). APC/C selects substrates for ubiquitination by using the Cdc20 or Cdh1 activator proteins to recognize specific sequences called APC/C degrons within target proteins (17). Several APC/C degrons have been characterized, including the destruction box (D box) and the Lys-Glu-Asn box (KEN box) (18, 19). The D box, with the consensus amino acid sequence of RXXLXXXN(X indicates any amino acid), are found in many APC/C substrates, including mitotic cyclins and are essential for their ubiquitin-mediated destruction. The KEN box, which contains a consensus KEN motif, is also found in several APC/C substrates and is preferentially but not exclusively recognized by APC/C^Cdh1. When APC/C is active, it directs progression through and exit from mitosis by catalyzing the ubiquitination and timely destruction of mitotic regulators, including cyclin A, cyclin B, and the separase inhibitor securin (16). The APC/C activity needs to be tightly controlled to prevent unscheduled substrate degradation. An important mechanism for APC/C regulation is the spindle checkpoint, which prevents the activation of APC/C and destruction of its substrates in response to kinetochores that have not properly attached to the mitotic spindle (20).Recent evidence shows that Sgo1 is a substrate of APC/C, and its protein levels oscillate during the cell cycle (8, 9). In this article we study the degradation of Sgo1 in human cells. We show that Sgo1 is degraded during mitotic exit, and this degradation depends on APC/C^Cdh1. We further show that both KEN and D boxes are required for Sgo1 degradation in vivo and ubiquitination in vitro. Removal of these motifs stabilizes Sgo1 in vivo. The prolonged presence of stable Sgo1 protein in human cells does not change the kinetics of chromosome segregation and mitotic exit. Therefore, a timely scheduled degradation of Sgo1 takes place but is not required for mitotic exit. Finally, we show that Bub1 regulates Sgo1 protein levels through a mechanism that does not involve APC/C-mediated degradation.     

Ric-8A and Giα Recruit LGN,NuMA, and Dynein to the Cell Cortex To Help Orient the Mitotic Spindle

In model organisms, resistance to inhibitors of cholinesterase 8 (Ric-8), a G protein α (Gα) subunit guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), functions to orient mitotic spindles during asymmetric cell divisions; however, whether Ric-8A has any role in mammalian cell division is unknown. We show here that Ric-8A and Gα_i function to orient the metaphase mitotic spindle of mammalian adherent cells. During mitosis, Ric-8A localized at the cell cortex, spindle poles, centromeres, central spindle, and midbody. Pertussis toxin proved to be a useful tool in these studies since it blocked the binding of Ric-8A to Gα_i, thus preventing its GEF activity for Gα_i. Linking Ric-8A signaling to mammalian cell division, treatment of cells with pertussis toxin, reduction of Ric-8A expression, or decreased Gα_i expression similarly affected metaphase cells. Each treatment impaired the localization of LGN (GSPM2), NuMA (microtubule binding nuclear mitotic apparatus protein), and dynein at the metaphase cell cortex and disturbed integrin-dependent mitotic spindle orientation. Live cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing green fluorescent protein-tubulin also revealed that reduced Ric-8A expression prolonged mitosis, caused occasional mitotic arrest, and decreased mitotic spindle movements. These data indicate that Ric-8A signaling leads to assembly of a cortical signaling complex that functions to orient the mitotic spindle.The cortical capture of astral microtubules is essential to generate the forces needed for mitotic spindle positioning for both symmetric and asymmetric cell divisions (23, 29). Failure to either capture astral microtubules or the inappropriate application of pulling forces adversely affects mitotic spindle orientation, and can impede embryogenesis and alter cell fate decisions. Studies examining mitotic spindle orientation in Drosophila embryonic and larval neuroblasts have identified two critical pathways, the Gα/Pins/Mud pathway and the Pins/Dlg/Khc73 pathway (29). The heterotrimeric G-protein α subunit (Gα), Pins (Partner-of-Inscuteable), and Mud (Mushroom body defect) are members of an evolutionarily conserved noncanonical G-protein signaling pathway, which form a tripartite protein complex linked to the apical Par complex by the adapter protein Inscuteable (29, 37). Reducing the level of Gα_i, Pins, or Mud prevents neuroblast mitotic spindle alignment. A second spindle orientation pathway involves Pins, the tumor suppressor Discs large (Dlg) and the microtubule plus-end-directed kinesin heavy chain 73 (Khc73). Khc73 binds Dlg and coimmunoprecipitates with Pins. Khc73 localized to astral microtubules can induce Pins-Dlg cortical polarity (27).In canonical G-protein signaling pathways, the binding of ligand to a seven-transmembrane receptor triggers a heterotrimeric G-protein α subunit (Gα) to exchange GTP for GDP, resulting in the dissociation of the Gα subunit from its associated Gβγ heterodimer (12, 20). This exposes interactive sites in the Gα and Gβγ subunits, allowing their binding to and activation of downstream effectors. Since Gα subunits possess an intrinsic GTPase activity, GTP hydrolysis leads to the reassembly of heterotrimeric G protein causing signaling to cease. In noncanonical G-protein signaling the seven-transmembrane receptor is replaced by an intracellular guanine nucleotide exchange factor, such as Ric-8 (37). In studies in Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans Ric-8 has been shown to positively regulate Gα_i activity and is essential for asymmetric cell divisions (1, 2, 5, 8, 11, 36). Although initially characterized as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for isolated G_αsubunits, more recent biochemical studies have shown that Ric-8A (the mammalian equivalent of Ric-8) also acts on a complex of GDP-Gα_i, the mammalian Pins homolog LGN, and NuMA (nuclear mitotic apparatus protein; the mammalian equivalent of Mud) catalytically releasing GTP-Gα_i and causing liberation of NuMA from LGN (30, 31). Ric-8A can also catalyze guanine nucleotide exchange on Gα_i1 bound to the GPR/GoLoco exchange inhibitor AGS3, a paralog of LGN (33). During mitosis the N-terminal portion of LGN binds NuMA and the C-terminal domain binds GDP-Gα_i and the trimolecular complex localizes to the cell cortex, where the dynamic release of NuMA from LGN may regulate aster microtubule pulling during cell division (3, 9, 10, 22).In the present study we examined the role of Ric-8A in mitotic spindle orientation in adherent cells and in polarized MDCK cells. In nonpolarized adherent cells cell such as HeLa, integrin mediated cell-substrate adhesion orients the mitotic spindle parallel to the substratum, and thereby both daughter cells remain attached. This requires the actin cytoskeleton, astral microtubules, the microtubule plus end tracking protein EB1, myosin X, cdc42, LIM kinase 1, and phosphatidylinositol(3,4,5)-triphosphate (PIP₃) (13, 18, 32, 34, 35). PIP₃ may direct dynein/dynactin-dependent pulling forces on the spindle midcortex to orient the mitotic spindle (34). In polarized cells such as Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, the mitotic spindle is constrained by the topology of the cell and cortical cues provided by adherens junctions (24). In contrast to HeLa cells these cues are insensitive to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibition, which blocks the generation of PIP₃ (34). We found that inhibiting either Ric-8A or Gα_i expression impairs the orientation of the metaphase mitotic spindle in HeLa cells and pertussis toxin, which blocks Ric-8A triggered nucleotide exchange, disrupts the normal mitotic spindle alignment of both HeLa and MDCK cells. Impairment of Ric-8A expression or function inhibits the localization of Gα_i1, LGN, NuMA, and dynein to the metaphase cortex opposite the spindle poles.     

Safeguarding Entry into Mitosis: the Antephase Checkpoint

Maintenance of genomic stability is needed for cells to survive many rounds of division throughout their lifetime. Key to the proper inheritance of intact genome is the tight temporal and spatial coordination of cell cycle events. Moreover, checkpoints are present that function to monitor the proper execution of cell cycle processes. For instance, the DNA damage and spindle assembly checkpoints ensure genomic integrity by delaying cell cycle progression in the presence of DNA or spindle damage, respectively. A checkpoint that has recently been gaining attention is the antephase checkpoint that acts to prevent cells from entering mitosis in response to a range of stress agents. We review here what is known about the pathway that monitors the status of the cells at the brink of entry into mitosis when cells are exposed to insults that threaten the proper inheritance of chromosomes. We highlight issues which are unresolved in terms of our understanding of the antephase checkpoint and provide some perspectives on what lies ahead in the understanding of how the checkpoint functions.Segregation of sister chromosomes during the metaphase-to-anaphase transition is a dramatic event that results in the inheritance of a complete set of chromosomes by each daughter cell undergoing cell division. This process, which occurs during mitosis, requires the temporal and spatial coordination of a myriad of proteins. As many excellent reviews on the process of chromosome segregation have been published (9, 37, 84, 97, 136), we give here an overview of the process.In essence, duplicated chromosomes are condensed and then lined up at the metaphase plate, where the sister chromatids are subsequently pulled apart by microtubules attached to the kinetochores. The duplicated chromosomes are condensed by condensin I and II complexes that function to pack interphase chromatin so that it can then be neatly divided into daughter cells (6, 48, 50) (see below). Yet other protein complexes essential for ensuring genomic integrity during nuclear separation are the cohesins which maintain cohesion between sister chromatids (17, 85). The cohesins are loaded onto the duplicated chromosomes toward the end of mitosis in the preceding round of cell division or in late G₁/early S phase in the new round of cell division (9, 90, 111, 130). The presence of the cohesins helps keep the sister chromatids together until the kinetochores are correctly attached to spindle microtubules emanating from both microtubule-organizing centers (i.e., the spindle pole bodies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae or the centrosomes in higher eukaryotes) in a process known as bi-orientation (122). Upon proper attachment of the mitotic spindles to the kinetochores, the sister chromatids separate as cohesins are destroyed through proteolysis by separase, a CD clan protease (129). Chromosome separation occurs as the spindle microtubules pull the chromosomes toward opposite ends of the dividing cells. This process of chromosome segregation is highly complex and requires tight regulation in order that genomic stability is maintained over successive rounds of cell division (1).In addition to the tight coordination of events during chromosome segregation, the genomic integrity of dividing cells is kept in check by the presence of checkpoints (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) that are needed to prevent the propagation of transformed cells (44). In mitosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint pathway plays a critical role in the surveillance of spindle integrity and elicits a delay in the metaphase-to-anaphase transition in the presence of spindle damage (83). The requirement for an intact spindle assembly checkpoint to maintain genomic integrity as cells undergo division is underscored by the correlations between mutations in the spindle assembly checkpoint genes and chromosome instability (15, 16, 72). Key players at the spindle assembly checkpoint include MAD2 and BUB1 (83).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Cell cycle checkpoint pathways impinging upon the cell division cycle. The cell division cycle is monitored throughout by various checkpoints, including the DNA replication (blue box) and DNA damage (red box) checkpoints, as well as the spindle assembly checkpoint (gray box). In addition, the antephase checkpoint (green box) plays an important role in preventing mitotic entry in the presence of various stress conditions (see text).Of late, interest has been gathering around a checkpoint that is presumably present in antephase and delays entry into mitosis. This checkpoint, named the “antephase checkpoint” by Matsusaka and Pines (71), is distinct from the G₂ checkpoints, which are activated in response to DNA damage (4, 5) and unreplicated DNA (100, 101). Also, a decatenation checkpoint that monitors the status of chromosome decatenation by topoisomerase II appears to act in a manner distinct from that of the antephase checkpoint (24). The antephase checkpoint has been proposed to function in response to a range of stress agents to delay entry into mitosis (97).In this review, we highlight the initial experiments which led to the idea of the existence of an antephase checkpoint which functions to prevent chromosome condensation, thereby safeguarding entry into mitosis in the presence of perturbations as cells prepare for chromosome condensation and segregation. We also review the players implicated in the checkpoint, such as CHFR (checkpoint with FHA and RING domains) (109) and p38 stress kinase (66), and discuss their roles in modulating the antephase checkpoint and the correlations between mutations or alterations in these genes with tumor formation. Lastly, we look at how the antephase checkpoint is likely to function, based on the current understanding of entry into mitosis and chromosome condensation.     

Aurora-A Kinase Is Essential for Bipolar Spindle Formation and Early Development

Aurora-A is a conserved kinase implicated in mitotic regulation and carcinogenesis. Aurora-A was previously implicated in mitotic entry and spindle assembly, although contradictory results prevented a clear understanding of the roles of Aurora-A in mammals. We developed a conditional null mutation in the mouse Aurora-A gene to investigate Aurora-A functions in primary cells ex vivo and in vivo. We show here that conditional Aurora-A ablation in cultured embryonic fibroblasts causes impaired mitotic entry and mitotic arrest with a profound defect in bipolar spindle formation. Germ line Aurora-A deficiency causes embryonic death at the blastocyst stage with pronounced cell proliferation failure, mitotic arrest, and monopolar spindle formation. Aurora-A deletion in mid-gestation embryos causes an increase in mitotic and apoptotic cells. These results indicate that murine Aurora-A facilitates, but is not absolutely required for, mitotic entry in murine embryonic fibroblasts and is essential for centrosome separation and bipolar spindle formation in vitro and in vivo. Aurora-A deletion increases apoptosis, suggesting that molecular therapies targeting Aurora-A may be effective in inducing tumor cell apoptosis. Aurora-A conditional mutant mice provide a valuable system for further defining Aurora-A functions and for predicting effects of Aurora-A therapeutic intervention.The equal partitioning of chromosomes at mitosis is critical for avoiding aneuploidy, a condition associated with spontaneous miscarriage, developmental disorders, and cancer (50). Mitosis requires coordinated completion of multiple events including nuclear envelope breakdown, chromosome condensation and congression to the metaphase plate, centrosome separation, spindle formation, chromosome-spindle attachment and error correction, sister chromatid separation, and cytokinesis. Multiple regulators, many of which are kinases, are required to ensure that each event is completed in a timely fashion and in the proper order (reviewed in reference 46). Although a number of mitotic kinases have been identified, their targets and the intricacies of mitotic signal transduction pathways are just beginning to be understood.The Aurora kinases are key mitotic regulators in eukaryotes (reviewed in reference 45). The Aurora family includes a single member in yeasts (Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ipl1p, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Ark1), two members each in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila, and two or three members in vertebrates. Although originally given a variety of names, Aurora kinases in multicellular eukaryotes have subsequently been classified into A, B, and C groups based on patterns of mitotic subcellular localization and homology, which also appear to reflect functional distinctions (8, 46). Aurora-A kinases are observed at centrosomes and adjacent spindle fibers, and current evidence supports key roles in regulating protein localization and function at centrosomes, as well as regulation of the assembly, stability, and function of the mitotic spindle (reviewed in reference 43). Aurora-B kinases display “chromosomal passenger” localization, residing on mitotic chromosomes and subsequently moving to the spindle midzone after separation of sister chromatids. Aurora-B family members have been implicated in the regulation of kinetochore-spindle attachment, the spindle checkpoint, and cytokinesis (reviewed in references 1 and 8). Aurora-C kinases, which have only been identified in mammals, have a limited expression pattern and appear to have functions that overlap those of Aurora-B (7, 53).The human Aurora-A kinase (hAurA) was first identified because of its overexpression in cancer cell lines (5, 58). The hAurA gene (stk15) resides on chromosome 20q13, a region frequently amplified in human cancers (5, 58). hAurA has been dubbed an oncogene because of the fact that its overexpression transforms immortalized rodent fibroblasts (5, 70). Polymorphisms in hAurA are associated with an increased risk of colon cancer, while murine AurA (mAurA) polymorphisms confer increased susceptibility to experimentally induced skin tumors (14). The mAurA gene is frequently amplified in radiation-induced lymphomas from p53 heterozygous mice, while loss of one mAurA allele has been observed in lymphomas from p53-null mice (41). Thus, aberrant AurA expression is associated with tumorigenesis, suggesting that insight into AurA functions will lead to a better understanding of tumorigenesis mechanisms.A number of experimental observations suggest that AurA kinases are required for normal centrosome maturation and bipolar spindle assembly. The AurA ortholog in Drosophila melanogaster (Aurora) was identified in a screen for mutations that impact the centrosome cycle (21). Syncytial embryos from hypomorphic Aurora mutant females display a variety of mitotic abnormalities resulting from a failure to separate centrosomes. Aurora-null flies die at the larval stage with characteristic monopolar spindles and circular chromosome arrays in larval neuroblasts. Such monopolar spindles arise from failed centrosome separation (21). Subsequent studies of Drosophila Aurora mutant alleles revealed additional defects in centrosome maturation (including a failure to localize transforming acidic coiled-coil protein, centrosomin, and γ-tubulin at centrosomes) and in asymmetric localization of Numb protein in sensory organ precursor cells (3, 17). Similar to the case in Drosophila, disruption of the C. elegans AurA ortholog AIR-1 by RNA interference (RNAi) or mutation causes defects in centrosome maturation and monopolar spindle formation. Centrosomes undergo normal separation but collapse, leading to monopolar spindle formation (16, 24, 56). Studies of the Xenopus AurA homolog pEg2 revealed similar phenotypes after overexpression of kinase-dead mutants, antibody-mediated inhibition, or immunodepletion (18, 19, 38, 52). Furthermore, Xenopus AurA has been shown to interact with and phosphorylate Eg5, a mitotic kinesin required for bipolar spindle formation, suggesting a possible mechanism by which AurA could influence bipolar spindle formation and/or stabilization (19). Thus, existing reports from these systems are quite consistent in implicating AurA in centrosome separation and function.In contrast to the systems described above, published reports of RNAi-mediated reduction of AurA expression in mammalian cell lines have contained conflicting results about the role of AurA in mitotic entry, bipolar spindle formation, and mitotic progression. AurA RNAi in HeLa cells was reported to block or delay mitotic entry, prompting the conclusion that AurA is essential for mitotic commitment in mammalian cells (27, 36). In contrast, other AurA RNAi studies showed accumulation of mitotic cells with monopolar spindles (12, 20, 67). These discrepancies call into question the functional conservation of AurA in mammals and highlight a need for additional studies to definitively address the roles of AurA. This is particularly critical for understanding the roles of AurA in cancer and for projecting possible effects of AurA inhibitors currently in development as anticancer agents. We used gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells to produce a conditional null allele at the AurA locus. Here we describe cellular phenotypes of AurA deletion in primary cells in vitro and developmental phenotypes of AurA mutant mice. We show that AurA deletion in primary embryonic fibroblasts causes delayed mitotic entry with accumulation of cells in early prophase, consistent with a role for AurA in mitotic entry. Nevertheless, AurA-deficient cells that enter prometaphase arrest with monopolar spindles and eventually exit mitosis without segregating their chromosomes. Prolonged culture of AurA-deficient cells leads to polyploidy with abnormal nuclear structure. Germ line AurA deficiency causes embryonic death at the blastocyst stage with mitotic arrest and monopolar spindle formation, while AurA deletion in mid-gestation embryos causes an increased mitotic index and increased apoptosis. Together, our findings indicate that AurA is required for timely mitotic entry and bipolar spindle formation in vitro and in vivo.     

Abrogation of the Postmitotic Checkpoint Contributes to Polyploidization in Human Papillomavirus E7-Expressing Cells

High-risk types of human papillomavirus (HPV) are considered the major causative agents of cervical carcinoma. The transforming ability of HPV resides in the E6 and E7 oncogenes, yet the pathway to transformation is not well understood. Cells expressing the oncogene E7 from high-risk HPVs have a high incidence of polyploidy, which has been shown to occur as an early event in cervical carcinogenesis and predisposes the cells to aneuploidy. The mechanism through which E7 contributes to polyploidy is not known. It has been hypothesized that E7 induces polyploidy in response to mitotic stress by abrogating the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint. It was also proposed that E7 may stimulate rereplication to induce polyploidy. We have tested these hypotheses by using human epithelial cells in which E7 expression induces a significant amount of polyploidy. We find that E7-expressing cells undergo normal mitoses with an intact spindle assembly checkpoint and that they are able to complete cytokinesis. Our results also exclude DNA rereplication as a major mechanism of polyploidization in E7-expressing cells upon microtubule disruption. Instead, we have shown that while normal cells arrest at the postmitotic checkpoint after adaptation to the spindle assembly checkpoint, E7-expressing cells replicate their DNA and propagate as polyploid cells. Thus, abrogation of the postmitotic checkpoint leads to polyploidy formation in E7-expressing human epithelial cells. Our results suggest that downregulation of pRb is important for E7 to induce polyploidy and abrogation of the postmitotic checkpoint.An important hallmark of human cancers is aneuploidy, the state in which a cell has extra or missing chromosomes (12, 25). Polyploidy is the state in which cells have more than two equal sets of chromosomes and is thought to be an early event in multistep carcinogenesis that can lead to aneuploidy (1, 24), as exemplified in Barrett''s esophagus (11). Polyploidy has recently been shown to occur as an early event in cervical carcinogenesis and to predispose the cells to aneuploidy (26). Other recent studies have shown that tetraploid but not diploid mouse or human cells induce tumor formation in mice (3, 9). These studies highlight the potential importance of polyploidy in carcinogenesis.The cellular mechanisms responsible for this polyploidy formation are as of yet undetermined, but several models have been proposed. First, abrogation of the spindle assembly checkpoint followed by cleavage failure may lead to polyploidy formation (36, 40). A second proposed model is rereplication, a process of multiple rounds of DNA replication without an intervening mitosis. Third, cells that adapt to the mitotic spindle checkpoint halt in a G₁-like state with 4C DNA content. Abrogation of this postmitotic checkpoint allows the cells to replicate their 4C DNA content, leading to polyploidy formation. This has been shown in cells that express the human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) E6 oncogene that degrades p53 (21). Finally, cleavage failure, which yields binucleate cells with 4C DNA content, is also a potential mechanism for polyploidy formation (31).The postmitotic checkpoint becomes activated when cells with an intact spindle assembly checkpoint become arrested during mitosis for a prolonged period of time and eventually adapt to the checkpoint, exit mitosis without cleavage, and progress into a G₁-like state with 4C DNA content (19, 22). The cells are prevented from continuing through the cell cycle and replicating their DNA by a proposed p53- and pRb-dependent postmitotic checkpoint (18, 19).High-risk types of HPV (of which HPV-16 is the most prevalent) are commonly associated with lesions that can progress to cervical carcinoma, which is one of the leading causes of cancer death in women worldwide (42). The transforming properties of high-risk HPVs primarily reside in the E6 and E7 oncogenes (reviewed in reference 7). The ability of high-risk HPV E6 and E7 proteins to promote the degradation of p53 and pRb, respectively, has been suggested as a mechanism by which HPV induces cellular transformation (6, 30). Expression of the high-risk HPV E6 and E7 oncogenes in human keratinocytes leads to polyploidy, which is enhanced by DNA damage and by activation of the spindle checkpoint through microtubule disruption (15, 27, 37, 38).Previously, it was thought but not directly shown that high-risk E6 and E7 induce polyploidy in response to microtubule disruption by abrogating the spindle checkpoint and that degradation of the tumor suppressor p53 by E6 is the mechanism by which E6 accomplishes this polyploidy formation (27, 37, 38). Others have proposed that E7 may play a role in stimulating DNA rereplication that occurs prior to mitosis initiation and polyploidy formation (20). Our recent studies demonstrate that E6 does not affect the mitotic spindle checkpoint (21). Instead, E6 abrogates the postmitotic checkpoint to induce polyploidy after microtubule disruption. Interestingly, E6 mutant proteins defective in inducing p53 degradation also induce polyploidy (21). The mechanism by which HPV E7 induces polyploidy remains to be determined. In this study, we investigate these possible mechanisms through which HPV-16 E7 induces polyploidy formation.     

Allele-Specific H3K79 Di- versus Trimethylation Distinguishes Opposite Parental Alleles at Imprinted Regions

Imprinted gene expression corresponds to parental allele-specific DNA CpG methylation and chromatin composition. Histone tail covalent modifications have been extensively studied, but it is not known whether modifications in the histone globular domains can also discriminate between the parental alleles. Using multiplex chromatin immunoprecipitation-single nucleotide primer extension (ChIP-SNuPE) assays, we measured the allele-specific enrichment of H3K79 methylation and H4K91 acetylation along the H19/Igf2 imprinted domain. Whereas H3K79me1, H3K79me2, and H4K91ac displayed a paternal-specific enrichment at the paternally expressed Igf2 locus, H3K79me3 was paternally biased at the maternally expressed H19 locus, including the paternally methylated imprinting control region (ICR). We found that these allele-specific differences depended on CTCF binding in the maternal ICR allele. We analyzed an additional 11 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and found that, in general, H3K79me3 was associated with the CpG-methylated alleles, whereas H3K79me1, H3K79me2, and H4K91ac enrichment was specific to the unmethylated alleles. Our data suggest that allele-specific differences in the globular histone domains may constitute a layer of the “histone code” at imprinted genes.Imprinted genes are defined by the characteristic monoallelic silencing of either the paternally or maternally inherited allele. Most imprinted genes exist in imprinted gene clusters (10), and these clusters are usually associated with one or more differentially methylated regions (DMRs) (27, 65). DNA methylation at DMRs is essential for the allele-specific expression of most imprinted genes (31). Maternal or paternal allele-specific DNA methylation of a subset of DMRs (germ line DMRs) is gamete specific (27, 39). These maternal or paternal methylation differences are established during oogenesis or spermatogenesis, respectively, by the de novo DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b together with Dnmt3L (5, 26, 48). The gamete-specific methylation differences set the stage for the parental allele-specific action of germ line DMRs, some of which have been shown to control the monoallelic expression of the associated genes in the respective domains (11, 34, 36, 53, 66, 71-73, 77). These DMRs are called imprinting control regions (ICRs).Two recurring themes have been reported for ICR action. ICRs can function as DNA methylation-regulated promoters of a noncoding RNA or as methylation-regulated insulators. Recent evidence suggests that both of these mechanisms involve chromatin organization by either the noncoding RNA (45, 50) or the CTCF insulator protein (17, 32) along the respective imprinted domains. The CTCF insulator binds in the unmethylated maternal allele of the H19/Igf2 ICR and blocks the access of the Igf2 promoters to the shared downstream enhancers. CTCF cannot bind in the methylated paternal ICR allele; hence, here the Igf2 promoters have access to the enhancers (4, 18, 24, 25, 62). When CTCF binding is abolished in the ICR of the maternal allele, Igf2 expression becomes biallelic, and H19 expression is missing from both alleles (17, 52, 58, 63). Importantly, CTCF is the single major organizer of the allele-specific chromatin along the H19/Igf2 imprinted domain (17). Significantly, CTCF recruits, at a distance, Polycomb-mediated H3K27me3 repressive marks at the Igf2 promoter and at the Igf2 DMRs (17, 32).A role for chromatin composition is suggested in the parental allele-specific expression of imprinted genes. Repressive histone tail covalent modifications, such as H3K9me2 H3K9me3, H4K20me3, H3K27me3, and the symmetrically methylated H4R3me2 marks, are generally associated with the methylated DMR alleles, while activating histone tail covalent modifications, such as acetylated histone tails and also H3K4me2 and H3K4me3, are characteristic of the unmethylated alleles (7-9, 12-15, 17, 21, 33, 35, 43, 44, 51, 55, 56, 67, 69, 74, 75). Importantly, the maintenance of imprinted gene expression depends on the allele-specific chromatin differences. ICR-dependent H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 enrichment in the paternal allele (67) is required for paternal repression of a set of imprinted genes along the Kcnq1 imprinted domain in the placenta (30). Imprinted Cdkn1c and Cd81 expression depends on H3K27 methyltransferase Ezh2 activity in the extraembryonic ectoderm (64). Similarly, H3K9 methyltransferase Ehmt2 is required for parental allele-specific expression of a number of imprinted genes, including Osbpl5, Cd81, Ascl2, Tfpi2, and Slc22a3 in the placenta (44, 45, 70).There is increasing evidence that covalent modifications, not only in the histone tails but also in the histone globular domains, carry essential information for development and gene regulation. The H3K79 methyltransferase gene is essential for development in Drosophila (60) and in mice (22). H3K79 methylation is required for telomeric heterochromatin silencing in Drosophila (60), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (47, 68), and mice (22). The H4K91 residue regulates nucleosome assembly (76). Whereas mutations at single acetylation sites in the histone tails have only minor consequences, mutation of the H4K91 site in the histone H4 globular domain causes severe defects in silent chromatin formation and DNA repair in yeast (37, 42, 76).Contrary to the abundant information that exists regarding the allele-specific chromatin composition at DMRs of imprinted genes, no information is available about the parental allele-specific marking in the histone globular domains at the DMRs. We hypothesized that chromatin marks in the globular domains of histones also distinguish the parental alleles of germ line DMRs. In order to demonstrate this, we measured the allele-specific enrichment of H3K79me1, H3K79me2, H3K79me3, and H4K91ac at 11 mouse DMRs using quantitative multiplex chromatin immunoprecipitation-single nucleotide primer extension (ChIP-SNuPE) assays. In general, H3K79me3 was associated with the methylated allele at most DMRs, whereas the unmethylated allele showed enrichment for H3K79me1, H3K79me2, and H4K91ac. These results are consistent with the possibility that allele-specific differences in the globular domains of histones contribute to the “histone code” at DMRs.